KSB ALI vs STATE OF A.P. . — C.A. No. 15571 - 15572/2017

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010011202013

Filing Date

08-Jan-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 15571 - 15572/2017

Diary Number

1120/2013

Order Date

04-Oct-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 995

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KSB ALI

    Adv. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF A.P. .

    Adv. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES D. MAHESH BABU[Caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Oct-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-Oct-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  5. 11-May-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 18-Nov-2016

    ROPView PDF

  10. 18-Nov-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  11. 18-Nov-2016

    ROPView PDF

  12. 17-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 17-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 29-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  15. 29-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  16. 29-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  17. 08-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  18. 08-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  19. 08-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  20. 02-May-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 25-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 25-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 21-Apr-2016

    ROPView PDF

  24. 21-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  25. 21-Apr-2016

    ROPView PDF

  26. 01-Apr-2016

    ROPView PDF

  27. 01-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  28. 01-Apr-2016

    ROPView PDF

  29. 15-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  30. 15-Feb-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  31. 15-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  32. 04-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  33. 04-Feb-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  34. 04-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  35. 29-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 29-Jan-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 29-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 18-Jan-2016

    ROPView PDF

  39. 18-Jan-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  40. 18-Jan-2016

    ROPView PDF

  41. 17-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 17-Nov-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 17-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 15-Oct-2015

    ROPView PDF

  45. 15-Oct-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  46. 15-Oct-2015

    ROPView PDF

  47. 15-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 15-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 31-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 31-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 31-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 17-Aug-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  53. 17-Aug-2015

    ROPView PDF

  54. 06-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 06-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 06-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 14-May-2015

    ROPView PDF

  58. 14-May-2015

    ROPView PDF

  59. 01-Apr-2015

    ROPView PDF

  60. 01-Apr-2015

    ROPView PDF

  61. 27-Mar-2015

    ROPView PDF

  62. 27-Mar-2015

    ROPView PDF

  63. 25-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 23-Mar-2015

    ROPView PDF

  65. 23-Mar-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  66. 13-Feb-2015

    ROPView PDF

  67. 13-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  68. 13-Feb-2015

    ROPView PDF

  69. 05-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  70. 05-Feb-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  71. 05-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  72. 07-Jan-2015

    ROPView PDF

  73. 07-Jan-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  74. 07-Jan-2015

    ROPView PDF

  75. 26-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  76. 26-Nov-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  77. 26-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  78. 04-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  79. 04-Sep-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  80. 07-Mar-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  81. 07-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  82. 17-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  83. 09-Dec-2013

    ROPView PDF

  84. 29-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  85. 01-Oct-2013

    ROPView PDF

  86. 24-Sep-2013

    ROPView PDF

  87. 26-Aug-2013

    Office ReportView PDF

  88. 26-Aug-2013

    ROPView PDF

  89. 26-Aug-2013

    ROPView PDF

  90. 26-Aug-2013

    ROPView PDF

  91. 08-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  92. 10-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  93. 09-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  94. 08-Jan-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 15571 - 15572/2017

  95. [ 2017 INSC 995 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: KSB ALI v. STATE OF A.P. (Civil Appeals 15571-15572/2017) Outcome: Supreme Court dismissed the appeals. The High Court's judgment (18 July 2012) upholding the State's position on disputed Kokapet village lands was upheld. Key Issues: The case involved a 70-year-old land dispute over 1,635 acres in Kokapet village (formerly Asad Nagar). Hundreds of claimants alleged they were legal heirs of Nusrat Jung-I, who purchased the land in 1852, demanding implementation of a 1954 Atiyat Court order granting "Madad-e-Maash" (grant-in-aid) status. The State claimed ownership after jagir abolition in 1949. Critical Findings: - Mr. KSB Ali failed to establish authority to represent 203 alleged heirs - Other petitioners never proved they were legal heirs of Nusrat Jung-I - Government memos (2002-2005) lacked proper constitutional authentication under Article 166 - The writ petition constituted abuse of process (Ali had withdrawn an earlier petition with liberty to pursue "appropriate remedy") Next Steps: Appeals dismissed without costs. The matter remains unresolved on merits regarding actual land ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case