RADHAMMA vs J. KULASEKARAN — SLP(C) No.(Verified On 7-5-2026)

Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section XII. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010109902026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No.(Verified On 7-5-2026)

Diary Number

10990/2026

Order Date

13-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – matters arising out of suit for specific performance, declaration, injunction, possession or cancellation of deeds/documents Section XII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RADHAMMA

    Adv. SOMANATHA PADHAN[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J. KULASEKARAN

Case History

  1. 13-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 13-May-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No.(Verified On 7-5-2026)

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Radhamma & Ors. v. J. Kulasekaran & Anr. (SLP Diary No. 10990/2026), the Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan rejected the petitioner's request for adjournment to engage a senior advocate, holding it was not valid grounds for postponement. The Court reprimanded the Advocate on Record for circulating the adjournment request letter and clarified such requests would not be entertained in future. The matter was listed for hearing after the partial Court working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case