BARKHA RAM . vs STATE OF HARYANA — SLP(C) No. 13265 - 13266/2005

Case under Section IV-B. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010109472005

DISPOSED

Filing Date

13-May-2005

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 13265 - 13266/2005

Diary Number

10947/2005

Order Date

11-Sep-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-B

Petitioner(s)

BARKHA RAM .

Adv. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF HARYANA

Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Orders

13-Jul-2012 ROP
31-Oct-2011 ROP
25-Aug-2011 ROP
13-Jul-2011 ROP
27-Apr-2011 ROP
18-Mar-2011 ROP
10-Feb-2011 ROP
04-Feb-2011 ROP
21-Jan-2011 ROP
21-Jan-2011 ROP
21-Jan-2011 ROP
14-Dec-2010 ROP
10-Aug-2010 ROP
15-Jul-2010 ROP
06-May-2010 ROP
16-Mar-2010 ROP
01-Feb-2010 ROP
13-Jan-2010 ROP
16-Nov-2009 ROP
16-Sep-2009 ROP
04-Sep-2009 ROP
17-Aug-2009 ROP
12-Aug-2009 ROP
29-Apr-2009 ROP
15-Apr-2009 ROP
13-Jan-2009 ROP
25-Nov-2008 ROP
10-Nov-2008 ROP
30-Sep-2008 ROP
23-Sep-2008 ROP
16-Sep-2008 ROP
16-Sep-2008 ROP
11-Sep-2008 ROP
21-Jul-2008 ROP
15-May-2008 ROP
29-Apr-2008 ROP
23-Apr-2008 ROP
04-Mar-2008 ROP
20-Nov-2007 ROP
20-Nov-2007 ROP
22-Oct-2007 ROP
09-Oct-2007 ROP
09-Oct-2007 ROP
09-Oct-2007 ROP
08-Oct-2007 ROP
13-Sep-2007 ROP
25-Apr-2007 ROP
22-Feb-2007 ROP
18-Jan-2007 ROP
08-Jan-2007 ROP
23-Nov-2006 ROP
10-Oct-2006 ROP
11-Sep-2006 ROP
01-Sep-2006 ROP
28-Aug-2006 ROP
11-Aug-2006 ROP
28-Jul-2006 ROP
21-Jul-2006 ROP
20-Jul-2006 ROP
07-Jul-2006 ROP
13-Apr-2006 ROP
13-Jan-2006 ROP
18-Oct-2005 ROP
07-Oct-2005 ROP
30-Sep-2005 ROP
29-Aug-2005 ROP
29-Jul-2005 ROP
20-Jul-2005 ROP
20-Jul-2005 ROP
11-Jul-2005 ROP
06-May-2005 ROP
21-Apr-2005 ROP
11-Apr-2005 ROP
04-Apr-2005 ROP
28-Mar-2005 ROP
14-Feb-2005 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: SLP(C) No. 13265-13266/2005 – BARKHA RAM v. STATE OF HARYANA On 11 September 2012, the Supreme Court heard consolidated special leave petitions against High Court judgments. The Court dismissed the special leave petitions but allowed pending procedural applications including delay condonation, setting aside abatement orders, and allowing substitution of parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case