SHANMUGAM vs SURESH KUMAR — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 179/2026

Case under Civil Law : Slps Arising Out of Interlocutory Applications in Civil Proceedings, Amendment of Pleadings, Time Limits for Pleadings, Interim Injunction, Addition/deletion of Parties, Etc. Section XII-B. Status: PENDING.

CNR: SCIN010109002026

PENDING

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 179/2026

Diary Number

10900/2026

Order Date

10-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Data as of 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : SLPs arising out of interlocutory applications in civil proceedings, amendment of pleadings, time limits for pleadings, interim injunction, addition/deletion of parties, etc. Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

SHANMUGAM

Adv. G. BALAJI

Respondent(s)

SURESH KUMAR

Adv. K. KRISHNA KUMAR[R-1] K. KRISHNA KUMAR[R-2] SHASHANK SHEKHAR[R-3]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

10-Apr-2026

Mention Memo

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead cases: C.A. No. 251/2026; T.P.(Crl.) No.

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this Supreme Court hearing from July 18, 2025, the court dismissed multiple Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) for various violations and procedural issues. In the main matter involving Maheshwari Navaria Alias Ruchita v. Gyan Chand Aswal, the court allowed withdrawal of 32 petitions after the applicants sought permission. For 9 other matters, the Registry was directed to verify if procedural defects had been cured. In a separate application (Diary No. 16064/2025), the discharge application was allowed. Additionally, six weeks were granted to cure defects in remaining cases, with dismissal threatened if defects weren't remedied, while one matter was adjourned for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case