SURJIT SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA — SLP(C) No. 8378/2026

Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to Arbitral Award, Matters Relating to Execution Under Section 36, Under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and Challenges to Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section IV-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010107732026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 8378/2026

Diary Number

10773/2026

Order Date

23-Mar-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to arbitral award, matters relating to execution under Section 36, under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and challenges to arbitral award under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section IV-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURJIT SINGH

    Adv. GEETIKA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 8378/2026

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: SLP(C) No. 26913 - 26915/2025

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court disposed of multiple Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court order dated 04-09-2025 regarding land acquisition compensation by NHAI. The Court modified the High Court's condition requiring land losers to furnish bank guarantees to receive 50% of deposited compensation, instead allowing release on security of their own land or other land owners' title papers. The Court also directed that pending compensation determination proceedings before the High Court be decided on priority or as expeditiously as possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case