AINTHA PRADHAN @ DAS vs BAIKUNTHA DAS — C.A. No. 8820/2016
Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 �€“ Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section XI-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010106742016
Filing Date
28-03-2016 12:00 AM
Registration No
C.A. No. 8820/2016
Diary Number
10674/2016
Order Date
27-08-2024
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AINTHA PRADHAN @ DAS
Adv. SHIBASHISH MISRA
Respondent(s)
BAIKUNTHA DAS
Adv. SUVENDU SUVASIS DASH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
Ordinary
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Administrative Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-08-2024 | Ordinary |
| 18-09-2023 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 31-07-2023 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 28-03-2023 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 14-02-2023 | Administrative Order |
Orders
Summary: In Civil Appeal No. 8820 of 2016 (Aintha Pradhan v. Baikuntha Das), the Supreme Court noted that the appellant's counsel had failed to serve unserved respondents as of May 29, 2024. The Court granted four weeks' time to the appellant's counsel to take fresh steps to serve the unserved respondents, with the warning that failure to do so would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal without further notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts