NEHA vs ANAND PANDAY — T.P.(Crl.) No. 479/2025
Case under Transfer Petitions : Criminal Transfer Petition Under Section 406 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/section 446 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section II-D. Status: SCLSC PENDING.
CNR: SCIN010106732025
Filing Date
25-02-2025 05:23 PM
Registration No
T.P.(Crl.) No. 479/2025
Diary Number
10673/2025
Order Date
04-02-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NEHA
Adv. APOORVA BHUMESH
Respondent(s)
ANAND PANDAY
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-7] ALPANA SHARMA[R-2] ALPANA SHARMA[R-3] ALPANA SHARMA[R-4] ALPANA SHARMA[R-5] ALPANA SHARMA[R-6] ROSHAN SANTHALIA[R-1]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
After Week/Month/Vacation
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Fixed Date by Court
Administrative Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 04-02-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 25-09-2025 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 11-09-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 01-08-2025 | Administrative Order |
Orders
The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner's application to file the Transfer Petition and issued notice to the respondents, returnable in four weeks. The Court stayed further proceedings in Cr. Case No. 337/2024 (State vs. Anand Panday & Ors.) before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Court, New Delhi, in the interim. The Court also noted that mediation may be explored for an amicable settlement, and that transfer may not be necessary as the petitioner's interests are being represented by the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts