TVL POOVAI AMMAN AGENCIES REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR S. SELVARAJ vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU COMMERCIAL TAXES AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY — C.A. No. 10525 - 10527/2018

Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010105222014

DISPOSED

Filing Date

28-03-2014 02:22 PM

Registration No

C.A. No. 10525 - 10527/2018

Diary Number

10522/2014

Order Date

12-10-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Petitioner(s)

TVL POOVAI AMMAN AGENCIES REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR S. SELVARAJ

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU COMMERCIAL TAXES AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

Orders in this case

[ 2018 INSC 964 ] Judgement - of Main Case
11-04-2017 ROP
11-04-2017 Office Report
11-04-2017 ROP
03-01-2017 ROP
03-01-2017 Office Report
03-01-2017 ROP
22-08-2016 ROP
22-08-2016 ROP
08-08-2016 ROP
08-08-2016 Office Report
08-08-2016 ROP
06-05-2016 ROP
06-05-2016 Office Report
06-05-2016 ROP
25-02-2016 ROP
25-02-2016 ROP
06-01-2016 ROP
06-01-2016 ROP
04-01-2016 Office Report
27-10-2015 ROP
27-10-2015 ROP
27-10-2015 ROP
27-10-2015 ROP
26-10-2015 Office Report
26-10-2015 Office Report
23-09-2015 ROP
23-09-2015 ROP
11-09-2015 ROP
11-09-2015 Office Report
11-09-2015 ROP
10-09-2015 ROP
10-09-2015 ROP
09-09-2015 ROP
09-09-2015 ROP
13-05-2015 ROP
13-05-2015 ROP
10-11-2014 ROP
10-11-2014 ROP
27-10-2014 ROP
27-10-2014 ROP
15-09-2014 ROP
15-09-2014 ROP
08-09-2014 ROP
08-09-2014 Office Report
08-09-2014 ROP
25-07-2014 Office Report
25-07-2014 ROP
02-05-2014 ROP
17-04-2014 ROP
04-04-2014 ROP
31-01-2014 ROP
20-01-2014 ROP

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 10412 - 10413/2018

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeals Nos. 10412-10413/2018 (arising from SLP(C) Nos. 36112-36113/2013), along with 46 connected appeals, all challenging the Madras High Court's July 17, 2013 judgment. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, which imposes a mandatory 90-day time limit (or end of financial year, whichever is later) for claiming Input Tax Credit. The Court dismissed appellants' arguments that this provision was arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g), or that it conflicted with substantive tax credit provisions, ruling that statutory tax benefits must be claimed strictly per statutory conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case