Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2017 / Diary 10295

HUMA RIZVI ABBASI v. FAHAD ABBASI

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10295/2017

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

18-04-2017

Bench

Petitioner

HUMA RIZVI ABBASI

Respondent

FAHAD ABBASI

casestatus.in Summary

Where no sufficient ground for transfer is established under Section 25 CPC, a transfer petition must be dismissed; however, a party unable to attend proceedings may seek relief through video conferencing before the concerned court. This procedural safeguard, noted in analysis available on casestatus.in, ensures access to justice without necessitating a transfer of proceedings.

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).571/2017 HUMA RIZVI ABBASI Petitioner(s) VERSUS FAHAD ABBASI Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for ex-parte stay) Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nakul Dewan, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Adv. Ms. Qurratulain, Adv. Mr. Zain Maqbool, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No ground for transfer is made out. The Transfer Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Further, in view of the order of this Court dated 9.03.2017 in T.P.(C) No.1912 of 2014 titled 'Krishna Veni Nagam Vs. Harish Nigam', the petitioner is at liberty to pray to the concerned court for participating in the proceedings by video conferencing. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

zITEM NO.3 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).571/2017HUMA RIZVI ABBASI Petitioner(s) VERSUSFAHAD ABBASI Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for ex-parte stay)Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Nakul Dewan, Adv.Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv.Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Adv.Ms. Qurratulain, Adv.Mr. Zain Maqbool, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No ground for transfer is made out. The TransferPetition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications,if any, stand disposed of. Further, in view of the order of this Court dated9.03.2017 in T.P.(C) No.1912 of 2014 titled 'Krishna VeniNagam Vs. Harish Nigam', the petitioner is at liberty topray to the concerned court for participating in theproceedings by video conferencing. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India