Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2015 / Diary 10294

SURINDER PAL TYAGI . v. STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10294/2015

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

22-07-2016

Bench

Petitioner

SURINDER PAL TYAGI .

Respondent

STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) .

casestatus.in Summary

Anticipatory bail cannot be denied merely on account of a lengthy investigation under Sections 406/420/120B IPC where accused have participated in investigation at some stage, and non-cooperation may warrant cancellation of such bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 PDF 7 PDF 8 PDF 9 PDF 10 PDF 11 PDF 12 PDF 13 PDF 14 PDF 15 PDF 16 PDF 17 PDF 18 PDF 19 PDF 20 PDF 21 PDF 22 PDF 23 PDF 24 PDF 25 PDF 26 PDF 27 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

1 ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.7 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 22/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. A. Pujari, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, AOR Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Samten Doma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Ananya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sheoran, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. G. Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. R. Raghupathy, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Solicitor General. The allegations against the petitioners arise out of an FIR lodged on 21 st March, 2014 under Sections 406/420/120-B of the IPC. It is stated in the status report handed over to us in Court today by the Investigating Officer of the Economic Offences Wing that two of the petitioners, i.e., Surender Pal Tyagi and Amit Tyagi had appeared for investigations subsequent to the transfer of the case on 24.11.2015 to the Economic Offences Wing on 31.12.2015, 09.02.2016 and 15.06.2016. With regard to the third petitioner, i.e., Anuj Tyagi, it is stated that he has not joined the investigation in the Economic Offences Wing, but from the additional affidavit filed by the respondent on 3 rd December, 2015, it is stated that Anuj Tyagi had joined investigation on 12 th September, 2015. By an order dated 6 th April, 2015, we had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners on each of them making a deposit of Rs.25,000/- in cash to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. We had also required the petitioners to participate and cooperate in the investigation, whenever required. From the status report shown to us, it is clear that two of the petitioners have been participating in the

3 investigations after it was transferred to the Economic Offences Wing. As far as the third petitioner, i.e, Anuj Tyagi, is concerned, the contention of learned Additional Solicitor General is that he has not been participating in the investigation by the Economic Offences Wing. If that is so, the respondents can take appropriate steps insofar as the third petitioner, i.e., Anuj Tyagi, is concerned. Be that as it may, in our opinion, since there has been participation by the petitioners in the investigations at one stage or the other and the matter pertains to an offence of forgery under Sections 406/420/120B IPC, it may not be appropriate to deny anticipatory bail to the petitioners, particularly since the matter has been under investigation for the last more than two years. Accordingly, the petitioners, if arrested, may be released on bail subject to the deposit of an amount of Rs.2,75,000/- (Rupees two lakhs seventy-five thousand only) each in addition to Rs.25,000/- already deposited by each of the petitioners with the Trial Court. Needless to say, the petitioners will cooperate in the investigations. In the event the petitioners do not cooperate or do not put in appearance when summoned by the Investigating Officer, the Investigating Officer may move the Trial

4 Court for appropriate orders including cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court. The special leave petition is disposed of. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

L- 1 ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.7 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 22/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. A. Pujari, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, AOR Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Samten Doma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Ananya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sheoran, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. G. Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. R. Raghupathy, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AORSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.07.2217:14:35 ISTReason: 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners andthe learned Additional Solicitor General. The allegations against the petitioners arise out ofan FIR lodged on 21st March, 2014 under Sections406/420/120-B of the IPC.

It is stated in the status report handed over to usin Court today by the Investigating Officer of theEconomic Offences Wing that two of the petitioners, i.e.,Surender Pal Tyagi and Amit Tyagi had appeared forinvestigations subsequent to the transfer of the case on24.11.2015 to the Economic Offences Wing on 31.12.2015,09.02.2016 and 15.06.2016. With regard to the thirdpetitioner, i.e., Anuj Tyagi, it is stated that he hasnot joined the investigation in the Economic OffencesWing, but from the additional affidavit filed by therespondent on 3rd December, 2015, it is stated that AnujTyagi had joined investigation on 12th September, 2015. By an order dated 6th April, 2015, we had grantedanticipatory bail to the petitioners on each of themmaking a deposit of Rs.25,000/- in cash to thesatisfaction of the Trial Court. We had also requiredthe petitioners to participate and cooperate in theinvestigation, whenever required. From the status report shown to us, it is clear thattwo of the petitioners have been participating in the 3investigations after it was transferred to the EconomicOffences Wing. As far as the third petitioner, i.e, AnujTyagi, is concerned, the contention of learned AdditionalSolicitor General is that he has not been participatingin the investigation by the Economic Offences Wing. Ifthat is so, the respondents can take appropriate stepsinsofar as the third petitioner, i.e., Anuj Tyagi, isconcerned. Be that as it may, in our opinion, since there hasbeen participation by the petitioners in theinvestigations at one stage or the other and the matterpertains to an offence of forgery under Sections406/420/120B IPC, it may not be appropriate to deny

anticipatory bail to the petitioners, particularly sincethe matter has been under investigation for the last morethan two years. Accordingly, the petitioners, if arrested, may bereleased on bail subject to the deposit of an amount ofRs.2,75,000/- (Rupees two lakhs seventy-five thousandonly) each in addition to Rs.25,000/- already depositedby each of the petitioners with the Trial Court. Needless to say, the petitioners will cooperate inthe investigations. In the event the petitioners do not cooperate or donot put in appearance when summoned by the InvestigatingOfficer, the Investigating Officer may move the Trial 4Court for appropriate orders including cancellation ofthe anticipatory bail granted by this Court. The special leave petition is disposed of. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Mr. R. Bala, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. G. Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 22.07.2016. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

X ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Mr. R. Bala, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. G. Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 22.07.2016. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.07.1117:04:10 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No.238/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pujari, Adv. Mr. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P S Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. R. Raghupathi, Adv. Mr. Prabhunath Sinha, Adv. Mr. M. Krishna, Adv. Ms. Shahgun Sukla, Adv. Dr. A. Baskar, Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. M r. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter before a Bench presided over by Hon'ble Madan B. Lokur, J., after obtaining permission from Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2555 OF 2015 SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE(G.N.C.T. DELHI)& ANR. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11.12.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Learned Additional Solicitor General says that the investigation of the case has now been transferred to Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police vide order dated 24 th November, 2015. An affidavit may be filed to this effect. Reply may be filed thereafter. List the matter in January, 2016. ” It is submitted that pursuant to order quoted above Mr. D.S. Mahra, Counsel for the Respondent No.1 has on 05.01.2016 filed additional affidavit.(Copy of the same is included in SLP Paper Books) Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 8 th day of January, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 2. Mr. D.S. Mahra , Advocate Central Agency, Supreme Court of India 3. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ravin/c1

\230ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2555/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015in BA No.238/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission tofile additional documents and permission to place addl. documentson record and interim relief and office report)Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pujari, Adv. Mr. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P S Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. R. Raghupathi, Adv. Mr. Prabhunath Sinha, Adv.Mr. M. Krishna, Adv. Ms. Shahgun Sukla, Adv. Dr. A. Baskar, Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. M r. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter before a Bench presided over by Hon'ble MadanB. Lokur, J., after obtaining permission from Hon'ble the ChiefJustice. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 11/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Mr. M. Thangathurai, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shagon Shukla, Adv. Mr. Shashank Bajpai, Adv. Mr. R. Ragupathi, Adv. Mr. Prabhunath Sinha, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned Additional Solicitor General says that the investigation of the case has now been transferred to Economic 1

Offences Wing of the Delhi Police vide order dated 24 th November, 2015. An affidavit may be filed to this effect. Reply may be filed thereafter. List the matter in January, 2016. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master 2

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2555 OF 2015 SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE(G.N.C.T. DELHI)& ANR. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 04.12.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned to 11.12.2015.” It is submitted that Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate has on 09.12.2015 filed reply by the petitioner to the additional affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent/State(NCT of Delhi) alongwith application for exemption from filing O.T. Copy of the same is circulated herewith for kind perusal of Hon'ble Court. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 10 th day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 2. Mr. D.S. Mahra , Advocate Central Agency, Supreme Court of India 3. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ravin/c1

R ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 11/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Mr. M. Thangathurai, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shagon Shukla, Adv. Mr. Shashank Bajpai, Adv. Mr. R. Ragupathi, Adv. Mr. Prabhunath Sinha, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified Learned Additional Solicitor General says that theDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.12.1112:31:41 ISTReason: investigation of the case has now been transferred to Economic 1Offences Wing of the Delhi Police vide order dated 24 th November,2015. An affidavit may be filed to this effect. Reply may be filed thereafter.

List the matter in January, 2016.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master 2

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. M. Kohli, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned to 11.12.2015. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2555 OF 2015 SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE(G.N.C.T. DELHI)& ANR. ... Respondent(s) REVISED OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.11.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Learned Additional Solicitor General says that he will file an additional affidavit within two days to the effect that the petitioners are absconders for whom a proclamation has been issued. Response thereto may be filed within a day thereafter. List the matter on 04.12.2015. In the meanwhile, all the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer at 11.00AM everyday from 28.11.2015 onwards. Learned counsel also says that the admitted hand-writing and signature of all the petitioners will be given to the Investigating Officer. ” It is submitted that Mr. D.S. Mahara, Advocate has on 3 rd December, 2015 filed additional affidavit on behalf of sole respondent/State(NCT of Delhi). Copy of the same is circulated herewith for kind perusal of Hon'ble Court. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 3 rd day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 2. Mr. D.S. Mahra , Advocate Central Agency, Supreme Court of India 3. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ravin/c1

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. M. Kohli, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned to 11.12.2015.Signature Not Verified (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur)Digitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.12.04 Court Master12:33:00 ISTReason: Court Master

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 27/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Pujita, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned Additional Solicitor General says that he will file an additional affidavit within two days to the effect that the petitioners are absconders for whom a proclamation has been issued. Response thereto may be filed within a day thereafter. List the matter on 04.12.2015. In the meanwhile, all the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer at 11.00AM everyday from 28.11.2015 onwards. Learned counsel also says that the admitted hand-writing and signature of all the petitioners will be given to the Investigating Officer. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

¢ ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 27/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Pujita, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned Additional Solicitor General says that he will file an additional affidavit within two days to the effect that the petitioners are absconders for whom a proclamation has been issued. Response thereto may be filed within a day thereafter. List the matter on 04.12.2015. In the meanwhile, all the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer at 11.00AM everyday from 28.11.2015 onwards.Signature Not Verified Learned counsel also says that the admitted hand-writing and signature of all the petitioners will be given to the InvestigatingDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.11.2712:58:58 IST Officer.Reason: (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.65 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 28/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after two weeks. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2555 OF 2015 SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE(G.N.C.T. DELHI)& ANR. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 07.09.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Application for impleadment is allowed. Liberty to file additional documents/affidavits granted. List the matter after two weeks.” It is submitted that pursuant to the order quoted above, Dr. A. Najeerul Ameen has been impleaded as Respondent No.2 & Cause Title has been amended accordingly. Copy of Amended Cause Title is included in SLP Paper Books. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed additional documents/affidavits, so far. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete on both Respondents. Respondent No.1 is represented by Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate and Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mr. Satish Kumar,Advocate. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 16 th day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 2. Mr. D.S. Mahra , Advocate Central Agency, Supreme Court of India 3. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ravin/c1

¶ ITEM NO.65 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 28/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after two weeks. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.09.3006:04:29 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for impleadment and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. v. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Nipun Saxena, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for impleadment is allowed. Liberty to file additional documents/affidavits granted. List the matter after two weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2555 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 7573 OF 2015 (Application for impleadment) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE(G.N.C.T. DELHI) ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.07.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “In view of the leter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned. List the matter after pleadings are complete.” It is submitted that Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate has on 28.04.2015 filed an application for impleadment on behalf of Applicant/complainant to be impleaded as Respondent No.2. Copy of the same is included in SLP Paper Books. It is further submitted that Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate has on 20.08.2015 filed Rejoinder Affidavit on behalf of petitoner. Copy of the same is included in SLP Paper Books. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. Pleading are complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 21 st day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 2. Mr. D.S. Mahra , Advocate Central Agency, Supreme Court of India 3. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ravin/c1

Ò ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for impleadment and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. v. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Nipun Saxena, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for impleadment is allowed. Liberty to file additional documents/affidavitsSignature Not Verified granted.Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.09.0717:24:00 IST List the matter after two weeks.Reason: (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERÒ ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for impleadment and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. v. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Nipun Saxena, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for impleadment is allowed. Liberty to file additional documents/affidavitsSignature Not Verified granted.Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.09.0717:24:00 IST List the matter after two weeks.Reason: (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for impleadment and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 27/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pragya Baghel, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Pinki Anand, ASG Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. R.S. Nagar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned. List the matter after pleadings are complete. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2555 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 7573 OF 2015 (Application for impleadment) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE(G.N.C.T. DELHI) ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.04.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice returnable in three weeks. In the event the petitioners are arrested, they may be released on bail by making a deposit of Rs.25,000/- each in cash to the satisfaction of the trial court. Needless to say, the petitioners will participate co-operate in the investigation, whenever required. ” Accordingly Show Cause Notice returnable on 05.05.2015 was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered Post A.D. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of sole Respondent. Copy of the Counter Affidavit is circulated herewith for kind perusal of Hon'ble Court. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. It is submitted that Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate has on 28.04.2015 filed an application for impleadment on behalf of Applicant to be impleaded as Respondent No.2. Copy of the same is circulated herewith for kind perusal of Hon'ble Court. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 1 st day of May 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

COPY TO: 1. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 2. Mr. D.S. Mahra , Advocate Central Agency, Supreme Court of India 3. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ravin/c1

î ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for impleadment and permission to file additional documents and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 27/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pragya Baghel, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Pinki Anand, ASG Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. R.S. Nagar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned. List the matter after pleadings are complete.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.07.2815:21:00 ISTReason: (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2555 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 7573 OF 2015 (Application for impleadment) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE(G.N.C.T. DELHI) ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.04.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice returnable in three weeks. In the event the petitioners are arrested, they may be released on bail by making a deposit of Rs.25,000/- each in cash to the satisfaction of the trial court. Needless to say, the petitioners will participate co-operate in the investigation, whenever required. ” Accordingly Show Cause Notice returnable on 05.05.2015 was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered Post A.D. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of sole Respondent. Copy of the Counter Affidavit is circulated herewith for kind perusal of Hon'ble Court. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. It is submitted that Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate has on 28.04.2015 filed an application for impleadment on behalf of Applicant to be impleaded as Respondent No.2. Copy of the same is circulated herewith for kind perusal of Hon'ble Court. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 1 st day of May 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

COPY TO: 1. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 2. Mr. D.S. Mahra , Advocate Central Agency, Supreme Court of India 3. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ravin/c1

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief) Date : 06/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohtagi, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in three weeks. In the event the petitioners are arrested, they may be released on bail by making a deposit of Rs.25,000/- each in cash to the satisfaction of the trial court. Needless to say, the petitioners will participate and co-operate in the investigation, whenever required. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

& ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2555/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2015 in BA No. 238/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SURINDER PAL TYAGI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. DELHI) Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief) Date : 06/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohtagi, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in three weeks. In the event the petitioners are arrested, they may be released on bail by making a deposit of Rs.25,000/- each in cash to the satisfaction of the trial court. Needless to say, the petitioners will participate and co-operate in the investigation, whenever required.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.04.0706:35:16 ISTReason: (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India