1 ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.8 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371- 25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-11-2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 13-01-2012 in RA No. 94/2011 13-01-2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP ON IA 1-4) FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 5-6 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 7-8 FOR APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT ON IA 9-10 IA No.135407/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING Date : 22-01-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Ms. Diljit Kaur, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Permission to file Special Leave Petitions is granted. Delay condoned. Applications for substitution are allowed. Application(s) for impleadment is/are dismissed.
2 We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order(s) passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-11-2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 and order dated 13-01-2012 in RA No. 94/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH Respondent(s) (FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP ON IA 1-4 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 5-6 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 7-8 FOR APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT ON IA 9-10 IA No.135407/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING) Date : 02-02-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters for final disposal on a non-miscellaneous day in the second week of April, 2018. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-11-2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 13-01-2012 in RA No. 94/2011 13-01-2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH AND ORS Respondent(s) ( and IA No.135407/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING) Date : 12-12-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Nayan Nepal,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the counsel for the petitioners praying for adjournment on the ground that the arguing counsel is not well. Adjourned for two weeks. (KUSUM LATA SYAL) (CHANDER BALA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.8 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-11-2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 13-01-2012 in RA No. 94-C/2011 13-01-2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH Respondent(s) Date : 05-12-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Shyam Sunder Rai,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nayan Nepal, Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents, list the matters after one week. (KUSUM LATA SYAL) (CHANDER BALA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-11-2011 and 13-01-2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 and in RA No. 94/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH Respondent(s) Date : 09-10-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mrs. Charanjit Kaur, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters for final disposal on a non-miscellaneous day in the third week of November, 2017. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.8 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and orders dated 22-11-2011 and 13-01-2012 in RSA No.1551/1984 and in RA No. 94/2011 passed by the High court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH AND ORS Respondent(s) Date : 06-07-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma,Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Arun Singh,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Daljit Kaur,Adv. For Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters for final disposal in the second week of August, 2017. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and orders dated 22/11/2011 and 13/01/2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 and in RA No. 94/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and impleadment and permission to file SLP and substitution and interim relief and office report) Date : 02/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv. No.1 For Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for respondent No.1 seeking adjournment, these matters are adjourned for two weeks. (Anita Malhotra) (Saroj Kumari Gaur) Court Master Court Master
ÖITEM NO.46 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.25371-25372/2012(Arising out of impugned final judgment and orders dated 22/11/2011 and 13/01/2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 and in RA No. 94/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHARANJIT SINGH Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and impleadment and permission to file SLP and substitution and interimrelief and office report)Date : 02/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan,Adv.Mr. Vinod Sharma,Adv.Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv.No.1 For Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of letter circulated by the learned counselfor respondent No.1 seeking adjournment, these mattersare adjourned for two weeks. (Anita Malhotra) (Saroj Kumari Gaur) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH Respondent(s) Date : 26/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 to clarify as to which of the two counter affidavits filed on behalf of respondent no.1 is to be taken on record and if said clarification is filed, registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court immediately thereafter. If not filed, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers as respondent nos.2 and 3 have been deleted from the array of parties. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
SECTION IVB Listed on 26.07.2016 Court No. R1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.8 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 10.12.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Two counter affidavits have been filed on his behalf. The ld.Counsel to submit clarification for one of them to be taken on record. Respondent no.2 is well represented. However, since he has expired, the legal representatives have to be substituted. Though an application for the purpose has already been moved but the defects thereof have not been cured despite the effective opportunities given for the purpose. Though the ld. counsel has requested one more opportunity, but it is apparent through the office report that six earlier adjournment have already been granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.” It is submitted that Dr. (Mrs) Vipin Gupta, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 has filed two Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and she has not yet clarified which one of them is to be taken on record. The name of Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 has been deleted from the array of parties vide Court's order dated 06.05.2016 & 19.11.2014 respectively.
Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 25 th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. 225, New Lawyer's Chamber, Supreme Court Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, R.K. Jain Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
z ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH Respondent(s) Date : 26/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 to clarify as to which of the two counter affidavits filed on behalf of respondent no.1 is to be taken on record and if said clarification is filed, registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court immediately thereafter. If not filed, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers as respondent nos.2 and 3 have been deleted from the array of parties.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRASHI GUPTADate: 2016.07.2717:01:39 ISTReason: (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 11-12/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 and order dated 13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondent) Date : 06/05/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.Nos.11-12 of 2016 for deletion of name of respondent no.2 are allowed. The name of respondent no.2 be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Cause title be amended accordingly. (SAPNA BISHT) SR.P.A. (S.S.R. KRISHNA) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 11-12/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 and order dated 13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondent) Date : 06/05/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.Nos.11-12 of 2016 for deletion of name of respondent no.2 are allowed. The name of respondent no.2 be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Cause title be amended accordingly. (SAPNA BISHT) (S.S.R. KRISHNA)Signature Not Verified SR.P.A. ASSISTANT REGISTRARDigitally signed bySAPNA BISHTDate: 2016.05.0710:20:07 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011 13/01/2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 22/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Amarnath Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted two weeks' time to prefer an appropriate application to delete the respondent No.2 from the array of parties. (SWETA DHYANI) (INDU POKHRIYAL) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
SECTION IVB Ch. matter Listed on 22.02.2016 Court No. 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.23 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 18.01.20016 with office report dated 18.12.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Learned Counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted four weeks' time to comply with the Office Report dated 18.12.2015.” It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not complied with office report dated 18.12.2015 so far. The office report on default is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) for orders. Dated this the 20 th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. 225, New Lawyer's Chamber, Supreme Court Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, R.K. Jain Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
f ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984 13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011 13/01/2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 22/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Amarnath Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted two weeks' time to prefer an appropriate application to delete the respondent No.2 from the array of parties. (SWETA DHYANI) (INDU POKHRIYAL) SR.P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.02.2317:09:31 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984,13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011,13/01/2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 18/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Amarnath Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for petitioners prays for and is granted four weeks' time to comply with the Office Report dated 18.12.2015. (SWETA DHYANI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER
SECTION IVB Ch. matter Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.08.2012, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Issue notice on the I.As as well as on the special leave petitions.” Accordingly, show cause notice to all the three common respondents was issued through registered A.D. Post on 22.09.2012. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Dr. Vipin Gupta, Advocate and she has also filed Counter Affidavit on his behalf. The name of Respondent No. 3 has already been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) order dated 19.11.2014. Counsel for the petitioner has on 04.12.2014 filed an application for Substitution of deceased Respondent No. 2 which is defective and Counsel has not cured the defects despite Ld. Registrar's orders dated 12.12.2014, 12.02.2015, 23.03.2015, 23.07.2015 and 21.09.2015 and this Registry's letter dated 01.04.2015. The matters above mentioned were lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 10.12.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Two counter affidavits have been
filed on his behalf. The ld.Counsel to submit clarification for one of them to be taken on record. Respondent no.2 is well represented. However, since he has expired, the legal representatives have to be substituted. Though an application for the purpose has already been moved but the defects thereof have not been cured despite the effective opportunities given for the purpose. Though the ld. counsel has requested one more opportunity, but it is apparent through the office report that six earlier adjournment have already been granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.” The office report on default is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) for orders. Dated this the 18 th day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. 225, New Lawyer's Chamber, Supreme Court Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, R.K. Jain Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
0ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 25371-25372/2012(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011in RSA No. 1551/1984,13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011,13/01/2012 in RSANo. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 18/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Amarnath Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for petitioners prays for and isgranted four weeks' time to comply with the Office Report dated18.12.2015.(SWETA DHYANI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER
SECTION IVB Ch. matter Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.08.2012, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Issue notice on the I.As as well as on the special leave petitions.” Accordingly, show cause notice to all the three common respondents was issued through registered A.D. Post on 22.09.2012. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Dr. Vipin Gupta, Advocate and she has also filed Counter Affidavit on his behalf. The name of Respondent No. 3 has already been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) order dated 19.11.2014. Counsel for the petitioner has on 04.12.2014 filed an application for Substitution of deceased Respondent No. 2 which is defective and Counsel has not cured the defects despite Ld. Registrar's orders dated 12.12.2014, 12.02.2015, 23.03.2015, 23.07.2015 and 21.09.2015 and this Registry's letter dated 01.04.2015. The matters above mentioned were lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 10.12.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Two counter affidavits have been
filed on his behalf. The ld.Counsel to submit clarification for one of them to be taken on record. Respondent no.2 is well represented. However, since he has expired, the legal representatives have to be substituted. Though an application for the purpose has already been moved but the defects thereof have not been cured despite the effective opportunities given for the purpose. Though the ld. counsel has requested one more opportunity, but it is apparent through the office report that six earlier adjournment have already been granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.” The office report on default is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) for orders. Dated this the 18 th day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. 225, New Lawyer's Chamber, Supreme Court Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, R.K. Jain Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report) Date : 10/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Two counter affidavits have been filed on his behalf. The ld. Counsel to submit clarification for one of them to be taken on record. Respondent no.2 is well represented. However, since he has expired, the legal representatives have to be substituted. Though an application for the purpose has already been moved but the defects thereof have not been cured despite the effective opportunities given for the purpose. Though the ld. counsel has requested one more opportunity, but it is apparent through the office report that six earlier adjournment have already been granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
SECTION IVB Listed on 10.12.2015 Court No. R1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.14 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 21.09.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ The ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 has requested four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Be filed as assured, as last opportunity. Petitioner still to cure the defects in the application for substituting the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.2. The ld. Counsel has undertaken to cure the same within four weeks time. Be cured as assured. Application thereafter be processed as per rules. An application for impleadment which has already been directed to be taken at the time of final hearing but the notice to the proposed party has already been issued and the service report is awaited. List again on 10.12.2015.” It is submitted that Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Counsel for Respondent No. 1 has again on 03.12.2015 filed Counter Affidavit on his behalf. However, she has already filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1 on 16.01.2015 and a letter dated 05.12.2015 to Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Advocate has been issued on 05.12.2015 for clarification in this regard.
It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not cured the defects in the application for substitution of deceased Respondent No. 2 despite Ld. Registrar's Order dated 12.12.2014, 12.02.2015, 23.03.2015, 23.07.2015 and 21.09.2015 and this Registry's letter dated 01.04.2015. It is further submitted that a notice for alternative arrangement for Advocate in the application for Impleadment (being I.A Nos. 910) has been issued to the applicant for impleadment whose erstwhile Advocate Mr. S.K. Sabharwal has expired. However, no service report of the notice for alternative arrangement has been received back so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete in respect of Respondent No. 2(Now deceased). The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 9 th day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
R ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report) Date : 10/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Two counter affidavits have been filed on his behalf. The ld. Counsel to submit clarification for one of them to be taken on record. Respondent no.2 is well represented. However, since he has expired, the legal representatives have to be substituted. Though an application for the purpose has already been moved but the defects thereof have not been cured despite the effective opportunities given for the purpose. Though the ld. counsel has requested one more opportunity, but it is apparent through the office report that six earlier adjournment have already been granted.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.12.15 Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in13:14:29 IST Chambers for further directions.Reason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report) Date : 21/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 has requested four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Be filed as assured, as last opportunity. Petitioner still to cure the defects in the application for substituting the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.2. The ld. Counsel has undertaken to cure the same within four weeks time. Be cured as assured. Application thereafter be processed as per rules. An application for impleadment which has already been directed to be taken at the time of final hearing but the notice to the proposed party has already been issued and the service report is awaited. List again on 10.12.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
SECTION IVB Listed on 21.09.2015 Court No. R1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.14 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 23.07.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ Respondent no.1 has filed an affidavit. The ld. Counsel has mentioned that affidavit is deposing about the proposed impleadment by proper party. For respondent no.2, since he has expired, application for substituting his legal representatives has been filed but the same is defective. Defects be cured within four weeks time. An application for impleadment has already been registered as IA Nos. 9 and 10. However, as directed be considered at the time of final hearing of the SLP itself. Since the application for impleadment is kept pending till the date of final hearing, the ld. Counsel has requested one weeks time to file counter affidavit. Be taken on record, if so filed. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to provide the complete set of pleadings and to substitute the missing and illegible pages of the paper book within one week. One week as already granted to the respondent shall reckon thereafter. List again on 21.9.2015.” It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not cured the defects in the application for substitution of deceased Respondent No. 2 despite Ld. Registrar's
Order dated 12.12.2014, 12.02.2015, 23.03.2015 and 23.07.2015 and this Registry's letter dated 01.04.2015. It is further submitted that a notice for alternative arrangement for Advocate in the application for Impleadment (being I.A Nos. 910) has been issued to the applicant for impleadment whose erstwhile Advocate Mr. S.K. Sabharwal has expired and service is awaited. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of serving the copy of complete set of pleadings so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete in respect of Respondent No. 2(Now deceased). The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 18 th day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
\212 ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report) Date : 21/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 has requested four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Be filed as assured, as last opportunity. Petitioner still to cure the defects in the application for substituting the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.2. The ld. Counsel has undertaken to cure the same within four weeks time. Be cured as assured. Application thereafter be processed as per rules. An application for impleadment which has already been directed to be taken at the time of final hearing but the notice to the proposed party has already been issued and theSignature Not Verified service report is awaited.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.09.2317:01:36 IST List again on 10.12.2015.Reason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report) Date : 23/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has filed an affidavit. The ld. Counsel has mentioned that affidavit is deposing about the proposed impleadment by proper party. For respondent no.2, since he has expired, application for substituting his legal representatives has been filed but the same is defective. Defects be cured within four weeks time.
-2- Item No.9 An application for impleadment has already been registered as IA Nos. 9 and 10. However, as directed be considered at the time of final hearing of the SLP itself. Since the application for impleadment is kept pending till the date of final hearing, the ld. Counsel has requested one weeks time to file counter affidavit. Be taken on record, if so filed. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to provide the complete set of pleadings and to substitute the missing and illegible pages of the paper book within one week. One week as already granted to the respondent shall reckon thereafter. List again on 21.9.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
SECTION IVB Listed on 23.07.2015 Court No. R1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.9 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Tr. Munshi & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 23.03.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ Petitioner has not yet cured the defects in the application for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.2. Two weeks time is requested. Granted as special chance. At this stage, the ld. Counsel for the Intervenor, Mr. Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Advocateonrecord has mentioned that the application for impleadment is pending appraisal for last one year. Registry to check such application as the office report is silent to that effect and shall process as per rules before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. List again on 13.5.2015.” It is submitted that service of SLP in the instant matter is complete on Respondent No. 1 through Dr. Vipin Gupta, Advocate and she has also filed Counter Affidavit on his behalf. Respondent No. 2 has expired and Application for substitution is defective as Counsel for the petitioner has not given the date of death and has not filed Death Certificate.
It is further submitted that the application for impleadment being I.A Nos. 910 were listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) on 13.05.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ List the applications for impleadment before the Court. I.A Nos. 910 to be considered at the time of final hearing of Special Leave Petition.” The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd day of July, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
2 ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report) Date : 23/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has filed an affidavit. The ld. Counsel has mentioned that affidavit is deposing about the proposed impleadment by proper party. For respondent no.2, since he has expired, application for substituting his legal representatives has been filedSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.07.25 but the same is defective. Defects be cured within four12:19:01 ISTReason: weeks time. -2-Item No.9 An application for impleadment has already beenregistered as IA Nos. 9 and 10. However, as directed be
considered at the time of final hearing of the SLP itself.Since the application for impleadment is kept pending tillthe date of final hearing, the ld. Counsel has requested oneweeks time to file counter affidavit. Be taken on record, ifso filed. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to provide thecomplete set of pleadings and to substitute the missing andillegible pages of the paper book within one week. One weekas already granted to the respondent shall reckonthereafter. List again on 21.9.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and office report) Date : 13/05/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List again on 23.7.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
SECTION IVB Ch.Matter Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 910 (Application for impleadment) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Tr. Munshi & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Advocate has on 04.08.2014 filed an application for Impleadment of one person namely Daljit Kaur as party respondent. The same is registered as I.A. Nos. 910. Copies of the same are placed with the SLP Paper Books. Service of SLP in the instant matter is complete on Respondent No. 1 through registered A.D. Post and Respondent No. 2 has expired and Application for substitution is defective as Counsel for the petitioner has not given the date of death and has not filed Death Certificate. The application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber with this office report. Dated this the 9 th day of April, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Dr. Vipin Gupta,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and impleadment and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 23/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Petitioner has not yet cured the defects in the application for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.2. Two weeks time is requested. Granted as special chance. At this stage, the ld. Counsel for the Intervenor, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Advocate-on-record has mentioned that the application for impleadment is pending appraisal for last one year. Registry to check such application as the office report is silent to that effect and shall process as per rules before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. List again on 13.5.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ø ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and impleadment and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 23/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Petitioner has not yet cured the defects in the application for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.2. Two weeks time is requested. Granted as special chance. At this stage, the ld. Counsel for the Intervenor, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Advocate-on-record has mentioned that the application for impleadment is pending appraisal for last one year. Registry to check such application as the office report is silent to that effect and shall process as per rules before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.03.2717:01:54 IST List again on 13.5.2015.Reason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and impleadment and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 12/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.2 has already been filed but the same is found to be defective. Defects be cured. Name of respondent no.3 has already been deleted from the array of parties in pursuance of order dt.19.11.2014. List again on 23.3.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ì ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and impleadment and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 12/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.2 has already been filed but the same is found to be defective. Defects be cured. Name of respondent no.3 has already been deleted from the array of parties in pursuance of order dt.19.11.2014.Signature Not Verified List again on 23.3.2015.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.02.1711:44:21 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 12/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for respondent No.1, Mr Siddharth Mittal to file vakalatnama within one week as last chance. In respect of respondent no.3, name has been deleted and the cause list has been amended vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers order dt.19.11.2014. Office report suggests that respondent no.2 has expired. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner though filed substitution application, but it remains defective. Liberty is granted to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects within two weeks. List again on 12.2.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar
0 ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 12/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for respondent No.1, Mr Siddharth Mittal to file vakalatnama within one week as last chance. In respect of respondent no.3, name has been deleted and the cause list has been amended vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers order dt.19.11.2014. Office report suggests that respondent no.2 has expired. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner though filed substitution application, but it remains defective. Liberty is granted to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects within two weeks.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.12.17 List again on 12.2.2015.17:39:04 ISTReason: (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984,13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011,13/01/2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date: 19/11/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Syam Sundar Rai, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the name of the respondent No.3 be deleted at his risk and consequences. Upon such statement, the name of the respondent No.3 stands deleted. Insofar as the respondent No.2, who is stated to have expired, learned counsel prays for and granted two weeks' time to file appropriate application for substitution. (Chetan Kumar) Court Master (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master
SECTION IVB Listed on Court No. Ch.Matter IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 25371- 25372 OF 2012. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Atma Ram (D) Tr. Munshi & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Charanjit Singh & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.08.2012, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Issue notice on the I.As as well as on the special leave petitions.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the three common respondents through registered A.D. Post on 22.09.2012. It is submitted that for completion of service, the matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court and pursuant to Ld. Registrar's Order dated 11.09.2013, show cause notice was reissued through registered A.D. Post and through the concerned District Court. A report from Additional Civil Judge( Senior Division) Dera Bassi has been received which reveals that respondent nos. 1 & 3 are not residing at given address and respondent no. 2 has expired. It is further submitted that the matter was listed time and again and lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 13.10.2014, when the following Order was passed:- “ The ld. Counsel, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Advocate-on-record undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1.
Petitioner has not filed the fresh address of respondent NO.3 despite Registrar's Court order dt.25.7.2014 and has also not moved application in respect of deceased respondent no.2. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. List again on 12.12.2014.” The default of the petitioner is reported to Hon'ble Court (In Chambers)with this office report. Dated this the 31 st day of October, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.25371-25372/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2011 in RSA No. 1551/1984,13/01/2012 in RA No. 94/2011,13/01/2012 in RSA No. 1551/1984 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date: 19/11/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Syam Sundar Rai, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the name of the respondent No.3 be deleted at his risk and consequences. Upon such statement, the name of the respondent No.3 stands deleted. Insofar as the respondent No.2, who is stated to have expired, learned counsel prays for and granted two weeks' time to file appropriate application for substitution.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byChetan KumarDate: 2014.11.2118:07:36 ISTReason: (Chetan Kumar) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 13/10/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Advocate-on-record undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1. Petitioner has not filed the fresh address of respondent NO.3 despite Registrar's Court order dt.25.7.2014 and has also not moved application in respect of deceased respondent no.2. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. List again on 12.12.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
( ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 13/10/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Advocate-on-record undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1. Petitioner has not filed the fresh address of respondent NO.3 despite Registrar's Court order dt.25.7.2014 and has also not moved application in respect of deceased respondent no.2. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.10.15 List again on 12.12.2014.12:46:36 ISTReason: (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
8 ITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25371-25372/2012 ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file slp and substitution and office report) Date : 25/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner to file fresh address of respondent Nos.1 and 3 and application for substitution with regard to the deceased respondent No.2. The same be filed within four weeks. List again on 13.10.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.07.2612:29:14 ISTReason:
¾ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25371-25372/2012ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing substitutionappln.,substitution,permission to file SLP and office report )Date: 16/04/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per the previous order notice to respondent nos.1 and 3 were to be issued on furnishing their fresh addressbut it seems that the ld. Counsel for the petitioner hasgiven the same address. Omission be rectified within threeweeks and on compliance notice be issued forthwith asdirected. Respondent no.2 is reported to have expired. Stepsfor substitution of his legal representatives as per rulesbe taken within three weeks. On compliance, same beprocessed as per rules. List again on 25.7.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARhj
úITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25371-25372/2012ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing substitutionappln.,substitution,permission to file SLP and office report)Date: 30/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice be reissued to respondent Nos.1 and 3 on furnishing theirfresh and complete address within four weeks through the concerned DistrictCourt in addition to postal service. Respondent No.2 is reported to have expired. Steps for substitutionof his legal representatives be taken by the next date. List again on 16.4.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR ||rd | | |
DITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25371-25372/2012ATMA RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)Date: 11/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner to file the process fee andspare copies in a week's time and on compliance, notice be issued forthwithto respondent Nos.1 to 3 through the concerned District Court, in additionto the postal service. In the event of default, the matter be placed before the Hon'bleJudge in Chambers for necessary orders/directions. List again on 22.10.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR ||rd | | |
èITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25371-25372/2012ATMA RAM (D) TR.MUNSHI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)Date: 25/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice be reissued to the respondents through the concerned DistrictCourt in addition to postal service. List again on 11.9.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
@ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 13414-13415/2012(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2011 & 13/01/2012 in RSANo.1551/1984 and in RA No.94-C/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH)ATMA RAM (D) TR.MUNSHI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHARANJIT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)Date: 17/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the I.As as well as on the special leave petitions. |(NARENDRA PRASAD) | |(RENUKA SADANA) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |