CHAMBER MATTER (6) SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(C) Nos. 2108-2109/2016 In SLP(C) Nos. 23003-23004/2015 STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS A. MOHAMMED BASHEER AND ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and office report) Date : 27/04/2016 These petitions were circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The review petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER Signed order is placed on the file.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 2108-09 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 23003-23004 OF 2015 State of Kerala & Ors. etc.etc. … Petitioners versus A. Mohammed Basheer & etc.etc. … Respondent O R D E R There is an inordinate delay of 195 days in filing the instant petitions for review of this Court’s order dated 7.8.2015 dismissing the aforementioned special leave petitions. No satisfactory explanation for condonation of such delay has been offered by the petitioner. Thus, though the present petitions are liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself, yet we have carefully perused the same and the papers annexed thereto. We are satisfied that no case for review of the impugned order has been made out. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay, as well as, on merits. .……………… ..……………….…....…J. (Jagdish Singh Khehar) ………………...…………………….…J. (C. Nagappan) New Delhi; April 27, 2016.
SECTION XIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) Nos. 21082109 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOs. 12 (Application for condonation of delay in filing Review Petition) IN PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) Nos. 2300323004 OF 2015 . STATE OF KERALA & ORS. ETC. ETC. ....Review Petitioners Versus A. MOHAMMED BASHEER & ETC. ETC. .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., Advocate for the petitioner has on 19.03.2016 filed the review petition alongwith the application for condonation of delay in filing Review Petition ( delay of 195 days) (Regd as I.A Nos.12) against this Court's Order dated 07.08.2015 dismissing the SLP(C) Nos. 2300323004 of 2015 by the Hon'ble Court (comprising the Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Y. Eqbal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C. Nagappan). It is further submitted to the Hon'ble Court that Original paper books of special leave petition have been weeded out after due preservation and the Advocate has filed fresh SLP Paper books. The Review petition alongwith applications abovementioned are circulated before the Hon'ble Judges in Chambers with this Office Report. Dated this the 11 th of April, 2016. Sd/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
, CHAMBER MATTER (6) SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(C) Nos. 2108-2109/2016 In SLP(C) Nos. 23003-23004/2015 STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS A. MOHAMMED BASHEER AND ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and office report) Date : 27/04/2016 These petitions were circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The review petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER Signed order is placed on the file.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by USHARANI BHARDWAJDate: 2016.04.2716:20:08 ISTReason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 2108-09 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 23003-23004 OF 2015State of Kerala & Ors. etc.etc. ... Petitioners versusA. Mohammed Basheer & etc.etc. ... Respondent O R D E R There is an inordinate delay of 195 days in filing the instant petitions forreview of this Court's order dated 7.8.2015 dismissing the aforementioned specialleave petitions. No satisfactory explanation for condonation of such delay has been
offered by the petitioner. Thus, though the present petitions are liable to be dismissed on the ground ofdelay itself, yet we have carefully perused the same and the papers annexedthereto. We are satisfied that no case for review of the impugned order has beenmade out. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay, aswell as, on merits. ..................................................J. (Jagdish Singh Khehar) .................................................J. (C. Nagappan)New Delhi;April 27, 2016.