Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2017 / Diary 1028

STATE OF HARYANA v. ANANT RAM AND ETC.

Supreme Court of India | Diary 1028/2017

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

10-04-2017

Bench

Petitioner

STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent

ANANT RAM AND ETC.

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 5876-5877/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31/05/2016 in CRM No. 18572/2016 31/05/2016 in CRM No. 19581/2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS ANANT RAM AND ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP) Date : 10/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Delay condoned. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, are also stand disposed of. (SWETA DHYANI) (VEENA KHERA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

"ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 5876-5877/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31/05/2016in CRM No. 18572/2016 31/05/2016 in CRM No. 19581/2016 passed bythe High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSANANT RAM AND ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP)Date : 10/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Delay condoned.We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugnedorder of the High Court. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.Pending applications, if any, are also stand disposed of. (SWETA DHYANI) (VEENA KHERA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India