STATE OF U.P.. v. BHAGWATI PRASAD PANDEY .

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2017 in Civil Appeal No(s). 317/2017 DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR Respondent(s) (For modification of court's order dated 10.01.2017 and office report) WITH I.A. No. 8/2017 in C.A. No. 318/2017 (With appln.(s) for modification of court's order and Office Report) Date : 03/03/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Appellant(s) Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Maurya,Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav,Adv. Mr. Aditya Samaddar,Adv. Ms. Harshia Deshwal,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. For applicant Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr. Milan Laskar,Adv. Mr. Parvez Dabas,Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The interlocutory applications are allowed to be withdrawn as prayed for. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

\ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 5/2017 in Civil Appeal No(s). 317/2017DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSRAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR Respondent(s)(For modification of court's order dated 10.01.2017 and office report)WITHI.A. No. 8/2017 in C.A. No. 318/2017(With appln.(s) for modification of court's order and OfficeReport) Date : 03/03/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Appellant(s) Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv.Mr. Rajesh Kumar Maurya,Adv.Mr. Ankit Yadav,Adv.Mr. Aditya Samaddar,Adv.Ms. Harshia Deshwal,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. For applicant Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv.Mr. Milan Laskar,Adv.Mr. Parvez Dabas,Adv.Mr. Uzmi Jameel,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The interlocutory applications are allowed tobe withdrawn as prayed for. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO . 312 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.28801 of 2011) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO . 316 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28802/2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO . 317 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28803/2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO . 318 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28805/2011) O R D E R Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The matter arose before the High Court seeking enforcement of the decision of this Court in State of U.P. v. Chandra Prakash Pandey - (2001) 4 SCC 78 recognising certain rights in favour of Kurk Amins employed in the cooperative department of the State of Uttar Pradesh. Learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition as follows: “ In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed. The Respondents are directed to consider the entitlement of the petitioners for appropriate pay scales with all other benefits with effect from 01.01.1986 and 01.01.1996 pay scale of 354-550 and Sahyogi to Kurk Amin in the pay scale of 305-390

2 with effect from 30.06.1984 and 08.06.1999 respectively as is evident from Annexure-1 and 2 to the Writ Petition and to pass an appropriate order determining benefits in respect to appropriate pay scale, arrears of salary etc. to which the Petitioners are entitled and, thereafter pay the same to the Petitioners within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before the competent authority. The order impugned in the Writ Petition shall not be construed to have any worth in considering the matter as directed above.” The Division Bench of the High Court while affirming the said judgment of the Single Judge gave further directions to the following effect: “ We further provide that the respondents shall be paid the entire arrears of salary by fixing their pay in pay-scales, as provided to Kurk Amins of the Revenue Department, giving benefit of revision of pay-scales, as might have been done during this period. They shall also be considered for grant of selection grade in accordance with law and rules, and shall, on attaining the age of superannuation, be paid post-retiral dues including pension by counting the period of service they have rendered as Kurk Amins prior to the enforcement of Rules, 2002. Those Kurk Amins, who have already retired, shall be given the difference of pay as arrears of salary and post-retiral dues including pension by re-fixing their pay-scales accordingly. This shall be done within a maximum period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. The amount deposited in Court by the appellants towards arrears of pay of the respondents shall be allowed to be withdrawn by the respondents. The balance amount shall be paid to them as per the directives gives above.” While the view taken by learned Single Judge is for enforcement of the judgment of this court, mentioned above, the judgment of the Division Bench, to the extent it has gone beyond the relief granted by learned Single Judge in the appeal

3 filed by the State, is not sustainable and to that extent the said direction is set aside. The appeals shall stand disposed of in terms of the judgment of learned Single Judge. No costs. ..........................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) ..........................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) New Delhi, JANUARY 10, 2017.

4 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for Directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report) Date: 10/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajat Singh,Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg,Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg,Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Bhardwaj,Adv. Dr. Vivek Sharma,Adv.

5 Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Ms. Priyanka Soni,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr. Milan Laskar,Adv. Mr. Parvel Dabas,Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jamil Hussain,Adv. Mr. Dushyant Parashar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna,Adv. Mr. Gudipati G. K.,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. In terms of the signed order, these appeals are disposed of. No costs. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON:10.01.2017         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     11                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      6 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802,   28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                   COMMON OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on   25.10.2016, with an office report 24.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass   the following order: “ List after Diwali Vacation.” It is submitted that the matters above­mentioned were mentioned before the   Hon'ble Court on 08.12.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following   order:        “ To retain its position. ” It is submitted that service is complete in all the SLP Paper Books. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this   office report. Dated this the 07 th     day of January, 2017.                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:      Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate       Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate.                Ms. Rani Chhabra, Advocate.      Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate.                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

Â21IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NO . 312 of 2017(Arising out of SLP(C)No.28801 of 2011)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)WITHCIVIL APPEAL NO . 316 of 2017(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28802/2011)CIVIL APPEAL NO . 317 of 2017(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28803/2011)CIVIL APPEAL NO . 318 of 2017(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 28805/2011)O R D E RLeave granted.Heard learned counsel for the parties.The matter arose before the High Court seeking enforcementof the decision of this Court in State of U.P. v. ChandraPrakash Pandey - (2001) 4 SCC 78 recognising certain rights infavour of Kurk Amins employed in the cooperative department ofthe State of Uttar Pradesh.Learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition asfollows:⬠S In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed. TheRespondents are directed to consider theentitlement of the petitioners for appropriate payscales with all other benefits with effect from01.01.1986 and 01.01.1996 pay scale of 354-550 andSahyogi to Kurk Amin in the pay scale of 305-3902with effect from 30.06.1984 and 08.06.1999respectively as is evident from Annexure-1 and 2to the Writ Petition and to pass an appropriateorder determining benefits in respect toappropriate pay scale, arrears of salary etc. towhich the Petitioners are entitled and, thereafterpay the same to the Petitioners within a period ofthree months from the date of production ofcertified copy of this order before the competentauthority. The order impugned in the WritPetition shall not be construed to have any worthin considering the matter as directed above.⬠\235The Division Bench of the High Court while affirming thesaid judgment of the Single Judge gave further directions tothe following effect:⬠S We further provide that the respondents shall bepaid the entire arrears of salary by fixing theirpay in pay-scales, as provided to Kurk Amins of theRevenue Department, giving benefit of revision ofpay-scales, as might have been done during thisperiod. They shall also be considered for grant ofselection grade in accordance with law and rules,and shall, on attaining the age of superannuation,be paid post-retiral dues including pension bycounting the period of service they have renderedas Kurk Amins prior to the enforcement of Rules,2002. Those Kurk Amins, who have already retired,shall be given the difference of pay as arrears ofsalary and post-retiral dues including pension byre-fixing their pay-scales accordingly. This shallbe done within a maximum period of three monthsfrom the date of production of a certified copy ofthis order.The amount deposited in Court by the appellantstowards arrears of pay of the respondents shall beallowed to be withdrawn by the respondents. The

balance amount shall be paid to them as per thedirectives gives above.⬠\235 While the view taken by learned Single Judge is forenforcement of the judgment of this court, mentioned above, thejudgment of the Division Bench, to the extent it has gonebeyond the relief granted by learned Single Judge in the appeal3filed by the State, is not sustainable and to that extent thesaid direction is set aside.The appeals shall stand disposed of in terms of thejudgment of learned Single Judge. No costs...........................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)..........................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT)New Delhi,JANUARY 10, 2017.4ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad, Lucknow Bench)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for Directions and impleadment and permission tofile additional documents and interim relief and office report)(For Final Disposal)WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 28803/2011(With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for permission to fileadditional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 28805/2011(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) forpermission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemptionfrom filing O.T. and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report) Date: 10/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani,Sr.Adv.Mr. Rajat Singh,Adv.Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv.Mr. Ankit Yadav,Adv.Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.Mr. Abhishek Garg,Adv.Mr. Dhananjay Garg,Adv.Mr. Deepak Mishra,Adv.Mr. Ashok Kumar Bhardwaj,Adv.Dr. Vivek Sharma,Adv.5Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv.Ms. Priyanka Soni,Adv.Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv.Mr. Milan Laskar,Adv.Mr. Parvel Dabas,Adv.Mr. Uzmi Jamil Hussain,Adv.Mr. Dushyant Parashar,Adv.

Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv.Mr. Ram Krishna,Adv.Mr. Gudipati G. K.,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLeave granted.In terms of the signed order, these appeals are disposedof. No costs.(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER(Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.804 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) WITH SLP (C) No.28802/2011 (With Office Report) SLP (C) No.28803/2011 (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP (C) No.28805/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report) Date : 08/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. (mentioned by) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R To retain its position. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master (*as shown likely to be listed on 10.01.2017)

NITEM NO.804 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010in SA No.187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature atAllahabad, Lucknow Bench)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)WITHSLP (C) No.28802/2011(With Office Report)SLP (C) No.28803/2011(With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for permission to fileadditional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.and Office Report)SLP (C) No.28805/2011(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) forpermission to file additional documents and appln.(s) forsubstitution and Office Report)Date : 08/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. (mentioned by) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTo retain its position. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master (*as shown likely to be listed on 10.01.2017)

1 ITEM NO.13MM COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 (With (With (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report) Date : 25/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav, Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal, Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh B., Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv.

2 For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr.Manoj Saxena, Adv Mr. Ram krishna, Adv. Mr. G.G. Kashyap,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List after Diwali Vacation. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON:25.10.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     11                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      13 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802,   28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                   COMMON OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on   27.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ In view of the letter circulated by Dr. Kailash Chand, the learned  counsel for the respondent, seeking adjournment, list the matters   on  25 th  October, 2016. It is  submitted that Pursuant to above order Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has   on 20.10.2016 filed a reply on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to the   Supplementary Affidavit. The same are being circulated herewith. It is further submiited that Service is complete in all the SLPs. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this   office report. Dated this the 24 th     day of October, 2016.              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:      Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate       Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate.                Ms. Rani Chhabra, Advocate.      Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate.                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

z1ITEM NO.13MM COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)(For final disposal)WITHSLP(C) No. 28802/2011(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011(With (With (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s)for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report) Date : 25/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav, Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal, Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh B., Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv.2For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr.Manoj Saxena, Adv Mr. Ram krishna, Adv. Mr. G.G. Kashyap,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List after Diwali Vacation. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions, impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C)No.28802/2011-(With Office Report) SLP(C)No.28803/2011 (With appln.(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file addl. documents and Office Report) SLP(C)No.28805/2011 (With for substitution, exemption from filing O.T., permission to file additional documents and Office Report) Date : 27/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkatramani,Sr.Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Chandra,Adv. Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav,Adv. Mr. Rajat Singh,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) * Proxy counsel for Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr. Mohd, Parvez Dabas,Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jamil Husain,Adv. 1

Ms. Priyanka Sony,Adv. For Mrs. Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna,Adv. Mr. Gudipati G. Kashyap,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by Dr. Kailash Chand, the learned counsel for the respondent, seeking adjournment, list the matters on 25 th October, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON:27.09.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     3                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      9 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802,   28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2                (Application for permission to file additional documents in SLP(C) No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4    (Application for impleadment filed by Ms. Rani Chabra and Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed   in SLP © No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 and 6 (Application for further  direction filed by Ms. Rani Chabra, and Mr. D.K. Garg,   Advocates in SLP © No. 28801/11 and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for direction in SLP © No. 28803/2011 filed by Mr. Shakil Ahmed   Syed, Advocate.) STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                    COMMON  OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on   02.08.2016 with office report dated 01.08.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass   the following order: “ Mr. Venkatramani, learned senior counsel for the petitioners   seeks  two weeks time for filing additional documents.  List the matter after three weeks.  Liberty to mention is granted.” It is submiited that Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Counsel for the Petitioner has on   22.08.2016 filed Supplementary Affidavit with the permission of the Hon'ble Court   in  SLP(C) No. 28801 of 2011 and same is included in the paper books. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in all the SLPs. The matters alongwith applications above­mentioned are listed before the   Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 24 th     day of September, 2016.                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:      Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.     Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv.                   Ms. Rani Chhabra, Adv.     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.     Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv                                                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

nITEM NO.9 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28801/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for directions, impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C)No.28802/2011-(With Office Report)SLP(C)No.28803/2011(With appln.(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file addl. documents and Office Report)SLP(C)No.28805/2011(With for substitution, exemption from filing O.T., permission to file additional documents and Office Report) Date : 27/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkatramani,Sr.Adv.Ms. Sangeeta Chandra,Adv.Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav,Adv.Mr. Rajat Singh,Adv.Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) * Proxy counsel for Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv.Mr. Mohd, Parvez Dabas,Adv.Mr. Uzmi Jamil Husain,Adv.1Ms. Priyanka Sony,Adv.For Mrs. Rani Chhabra,Adv.Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv.Mr. Ram Krishna,Adv.Mr. Gudipati G. Kashyap,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of the letter circulated by Dr. KailashChand, the learned counsel for the respondent, seekingadjournment, list the matters on 25 th October, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar2

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and substitution and Office Report) Date : 02/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Venkatramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Rajat Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. dinesh Kumar Garg, AOR Mr. Deepak Garg, Adv.

2 Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, AOR Mrs Rani Chhabra, AOR Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna, Adv. Mr. Gudipati G. Kashyap, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Venkatramani, learned senior counsel for the petitioners seeks two weeks time for filing additional documents. List the matter after three weeks. Liberty to mention is granted. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON:02.08.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     4                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      4 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802,   28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2                (Application for permission to file additional documents in SLP(C) No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4    (Application for impleadment filed by Ms. Rani Chabra and Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed   in SLP © No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 and 6 (Application for further  direction filed by Ms. Rani Chabra, and Mr. D.K. Garg,   Advocates in SLP © No. 28801/11 and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for direction in SLP © No. 28803/2011 filed by Mr. Shakil Ahmed   Syed, Advocate.) STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                        OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned except I.A.No. 2 in SLP © No. 28805 of 2011   were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.02.2016 with office report dated   04.03.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “List on a non­miscellaneous day in the second week of  April, 2016, high up on the Board. Application for substitution, filed in SLP (C) No.  28805/2011, is allowed.” Service Position is as under: SLP(C) No. 28801/2011: It is submiited that there are five respondents. Respondent No. 1 is   represented through Mr. D.K.Garg, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit. Respondent   Nos. 2 to 5 are represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter   Affidavit and Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. These   Affidavits stands  included in the SLP Paper Books. It is further submiited that pursuant to Court's order dated 21.09.2015,  notice   was issued to concerned parties through Advocate, hence service is complete on I.A

No 5 but no reply has been filed by the Advocates. It is futher submiited that Mr. D.K Garg, Advocate has filed an application for   futher directions and the same has been registered as I. A No. 6. SLP(C) No. 28802/2011: It is submitted that there are four respondents. All the respondents are   represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit and the   same stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed   Rejoinder Affidavit so far. SLP(C) No. 28803/2011: It is submiited that both respondents are represented through Mr. Shakil   Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit. Counsel for the Petitioner has   also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper   Books. SLP(C) No. 28805/2011: It is submiited that there are four respondents. All the respondents are   represented through Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit   on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Counsel for the Petitioner has also rejoinder   affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in all the matters. Thereafter, the matters above­mentioned were lastly listed before the Hon'ble   Court on 03.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ List these matters after the ensuing summer vacation.” The matters alongwith applications above­mentioned are listed before the   Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 01 st  day of August, 2016.                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:      Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.     Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv.                   Ms. Rani Chhabra, Adv.     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.     Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv                                                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

P ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and substitution and Office Report) Date : 02/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Venkatramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Rajat Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav, Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, AORDigitally signed byGULSHAN KUMARARORADate: 2016.08.0216:51:55 ISTReason: For Respondent(s) Mr. dinesh Kumar Garg, AOR Mr. Deepak Garg, Adv. 2 Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, AOR Mrs Rani Chhabra, AOR

Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna, Adv. Mr. Gudipati G. Kashyap, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Venkatramani, learned senior counsel for the petitionersseeks two weeks time for filing additional documents. List the matter after three weeks. Liberty to mention is granted. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

SLP(C) No. 28801 of 2011 ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. BHAGWATI PRASAD PANDEY & ORS.] (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 [DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. V. RAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation and application for permission to file additional documents and application for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V HASMATH ULLAH & ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation and application for exemption from filing Official Translation and application for permission to file additional documents and application for substitution and Office Report) Date : 03/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav, Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, A.O.R. in SLP 28805 Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) PAGE NO. 1 of 2

SLP(C) No. 28801 of 2011 in SLP 28801 & 28802 Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, A.O.R. in all SLPs Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, A.O.R. in SLPs 28801, 28803 & 28805 Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, A.O.R. in SLP 28802 Dr. Kailash Chand, A.O.R. in SLP 28801 Ms. Rani Chhabra, A.O.R. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters after the ensuing summer vacation. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER PAGE NO. 2 of 2

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON: 03.05.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     6                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      19 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802, 28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2            (Application for permission to file additional documents in SLP(C) No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4             (Application for impleadment filed by Ms. Rani Chabra and Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed in SLP © No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 and 6 (Application for further  direction filed by Ms. Rani Chabra, and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocates in SLP © No. 28801/11 and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for direction in SLP © No. 28803/2011 filed by Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate.) STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                      OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned except I.A.No. 2 in SLP © No. 28805 of 2011 were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.02.2016 with office report dated 04.03.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “List on a non­miscellaneous day in the second week of  April, 2016, high up on the Board. Application for substitution, filed in SLP (C) No.  28805/2011, is allowed.” Service Position is as under: SLP(C) No. 28801/2011: It is submiited that there are five respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Mr. D.K.Garg, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit. Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit and Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. These Affidavits stands  included in the SLP Paper Books. It is further submiited that pursuant to Court's order dated 21.09.2015,  notice was issued to concerned parties through Advocate, hence service is complete on I.A

No 5 but no reply has been filed by the Advocates. It is futher submiited that Mr. D.K Garg, Advocate has filed an application for futher directions and the same has been registered as I. A No. 6. SLP(C) No. 28802/2011: It is submitted that there are four respondents. All the respondents are represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit and the same stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed Rejoinder Affidavit so far. SLP(C) No. 28803/2011: It is submiited that both respondents are represented through Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit. Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper Books. SLP(C) No. 28805/2011: It is submiited that there are four respondents. All the respondents are represented through Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Counsel for the Petitioner has also rejoinder affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in all the matters. The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “List the matters on 03 rd  May 2016.” The matters alongwith applications above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 02 nd  day of May, 2016.                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:      Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.     Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv.                   Ms. Rani Chhabra, Adv.     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.     Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv                                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

\214 SLP(C) No. 28801 of 2011 ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. BHAGWATI PRASAD PANDEY & ORS.] (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 [DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. V. RAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation and application for permission to file additional documents and application for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V HASMATH ULLAH & ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation and application for exemption from filing Official Translation and application for permission to file additional documents and application for substitution and Office Report) Date : 03/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Yadav, Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. M. R. Shamshad, A.O.R.Digitally signed byKALYANI GUPTA in SLP 28805Date: 2016.05.0417:03:31 ISTReason: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) PAGE NO. 1 of 2SLP(C) No. 28801 of 2011in SLP 28801 & 28802 Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, A.O.R.in all SLPs Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, A.O.R.

in SLPs 28801, 28803& 28805 Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, A.O.R.in SLP 28802 Dr. Kailash Chand, A.O.R.in SLP 28801 Ms. Rani Chhabra, A.O.R. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters after the ensuing summer vacation. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 of 2

SLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions, impleadment, permission to file additional documents, prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. BHAGWATI PRASAD PANDEY & ORS.] (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 [DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. V. RAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR.] (With application for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. HASMATH ULLAH & ORS.] (With Office Report) Date : 12/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, A.O.R. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, A.O.R. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, A.O.R. PAGE NO. 1 of 2

SLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011 Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, A.O.R. Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Ms. Rani Chhabra, A.O.R. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, A.O.R. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters on 3 rd May, 2016. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER PAGE NO. 2 of 2

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON: 12.04.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     6                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      9 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802, 28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2            (Application for permission to file additional documents in SLP(C) No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4             (Application for impleadment filed by Ms. Rani Chabra and Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed in SLP © No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 and 6 (Application for further  direction filed by Ms. Rani Chabra, and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocates in SLP © No. 28801/11 and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for direction in SLP © No. 28803/2011 filed by Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate.) STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                      OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned except I.A.No. 2 in SLP © No. 28805 of 2011 were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.02.2016 with office report dated 04.03.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “List on a non­miscellaneous day in the second week of  April, 2016, high up on the Board. Application for substitution, filed in SLP (C) No.  28805/2011, is allowed.” Service Position is as under: SLP(C) No. 28801/2011: It is submiited that there are five respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Mr. D.K.Garg, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit. Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit and Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. These Affidavits stands  included in the SLP Paper Books. It is further submiited that pursuant to Court's order dated 21.09.2015,  notice was issued to concerned parties through Advocate, hence service is complete on I.A

No 5 but no reply has been filed by the Advocates. It is futher submiited that Mr. D.K Garg, Advocate has filed an application for futher directions and the same has been registered as I. A No. 6. SLP(C) No. 28802/2011: It is submitted that there are four respondents. All the respondents are represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit and the same stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed Rejoinder Affidavit so far. SLP(C) No. 28803/2011: It is submiited that both respondents are represented through Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit. Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper Books. SLP(C) No. 28805/2011: It is submiited that there are four respondents. All the respondents are represented through Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Counsel for the Petitioner has also rejoinder affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in all the matters. The matters alongwith applications above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 11 th  day of April, 2016.                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:      Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.     Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv.                   Ms. Rani Chhabra, Adv.     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.     Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

ìSLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature atAllahabad, Lucknow Bench)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With application for directions, impleadment, permission to file additional documents, prayer for interim relief and office report)WITHWITHSLP(C) No. 28802/2011[STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. BHAGWATI PRASAD PANDEY & ORS.](With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011[DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. V. RAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR.](With application for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011[STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. HASMATH ULLAH & ORS.](With Office Report) Date : 12/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, A.O.R. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, A.O.R.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, A.O.R. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, A.O.R.PAGE NO. 1 of 2SLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011 Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, A.O.R. Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Ms. Rani Chhabra, A.O.R. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, A.O.R.UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters on 3 rd May, 2016.[KALYANI GUPTA]COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR]COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 of 2

ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 (With appln(s) for substitution and exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 04/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani,Sr.Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Chandra,Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh,Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela,Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh,Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal,Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. V. Shekhar,Sr.Adv.

Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv. Mr. Ramkrishna,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,AOR Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas,Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Dr. Vivek Sharma,Adv. Dr. R.K. Pruthi,Adv. Mr. Parv K. Garg,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mrs. Rani Chhabra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on a non-miscellaneous day in the second week of April, 2016, high up on the Board. Application for substitution, filed in SLP(C) No. 28805/2011, is allowed. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON: 04.03.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     6                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      44 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802, 28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2            (Application for permission to file additional documents in SLP(C) No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4             (Application for impleadment filed by Ms. Rani Chabra and Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed in SLP © No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 and 6 (Application for further  direction filed by Ms. Rani Chabra, and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocates in SLP © No. 28801/11 and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for direction in SLP © No. 28803/2011 filed by Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate.) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 2 & 3 (Application for substitution on behalf of Respondent No. 1 alongwith  application for exemption from filing official translation in SLP © No. 28805/2011 filed by Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate). STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                        OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned except I.A.No. 2 in SLP © No. 28805 of 2011 were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.02.2016 with office report dated 01.02.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Reply be filed in IA 4 filed by Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,  learned counsel in two weeks. List the matters thereafter.” It is submiited that Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Counsel for the State of UP has filed Reply in IA filed by Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Advocate and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is further submiited that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 03.03.2016 filed an application for substitution on behalf of the proposed Lrs of deceased of Respondent No. 1 alongwith application for exemption from filing official

translation of death certificate and vakalatnama and memo of appearance and the same has been registered as I.A.No. 2  in SLP © No. 28805/2011 and the same is within time. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in all the matters. The matters alongwith applications above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 03 rd  day of March, 2016.                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:      Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv.     Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.                Ms. Rani Chhabra, Adv.     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.     Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

êITEM NO.44 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28801/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)(For Final Disposal)WITHSLP(C) No. 28802/2011(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011(With appln(s) for substitution and exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 04/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani,Sr.Adv.Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv.Ms. Sangeeta Chandra,Adv.Ms. Neelam Singh,Adv.Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela,Adv.Mr. Shashank Singh,Adv.Ms. Harshita Deshwal,Adv.Mr. Sameer Singh,Adv.Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s)Mr. V. Shekhar,Sr.Adv.Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv.Mr. Ramkrishna,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,AOR Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv.Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas,Adv.Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain,Adv.Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.Dr. Vivek Sharma,Adv.Dr. R.K. Pruthi,Adv.Mr. Parv K. Garg,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.Mrs. Rani Chhabra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList on a non-miscellaneous day in the second week of April,2016, high up on the Board.Application for substitution, filed in SLP(C) No. 28805/2011,is allowed. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011 ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28802/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. BHAGWATI PRASAD PANDEY & ORS.] (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011 [DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. V. RAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR.] (With application for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011 [STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. HASMATH ULLAH & ORS.] (With Office Report) Date : 12/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, A.O.R. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, A.O.R. PAGE NO. 1 of 2

SLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011 Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Ms. Rani Chhabra, A.O.R. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. Mr. P.N. Mishra, Sr. Adv, Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, A.O.R. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply be filed in IA 4 filed by Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, learned counsel in two weeks. List the matters thereafter. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER PAGE NO. 2 of 2

ÈSLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad, Lucknow Bench)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With application for directions and impleadment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 28802/2011[STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. BHAGWATI PRASAD PANDEY & ORS.](With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28803/2011[DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. V. RAMESHWAR PRASAD MAURYA & ANR.](With application for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28805/2011[STATE OF U.P. & ORS. V. HASMATH ULLAH & ORS.](With Office Report) Date : 12/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, A.O.R. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, A.O.R.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, A.O.R.PAGE NO. 1 of 2SLP(C) NO. 28801 of 2011 Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Ms. Rani Chhabra, A.O.R. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. Mr. P.N. Mishra, Sr. Adv, Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, A.O.R.UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply be filed in IA 4 filed by Mr. DineshKumar Garg, learned counsel in two weeks.List the matters thereafter.[KALYANI GUPTA]COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR]COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 of 2

SECTION XI                                     LISTED ON: 02.02.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA         Court No.:     6                CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.:      26      PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801, 28802, 28803,28805 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2            (Application for permission to file additional documents in SLP(C) No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4             (Application for impleadment filed by Ms. Rani Chabra and Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed in SLP © No. 28801/2011) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 and 6 (Application for further  direction filed by Ms. Rani Chabra, and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocates in SLP © No. 28801/11 and Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate) WITH         INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for direction in SLP © No. 28803/2011 filed by Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate.) STATE OF U.P. & ORS.         ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Etc.      ...RESPONDENTS                      OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.10.2013 with office report dated 19.09.2013 and listed Interlocutary application NO. 5 for application for direction was listed on 21.09.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: Order dated 19.09.2013 “The cases are adjourned.” Order dated 21.09.2015 in I.A. No. 5 in SLP © No. 28801/2011 “Issue notice. Let reply be filed within two weeks. List the matter after two weeks” Service Position is as under: SLP(C) No. 28801/2011: It is submiited that there are five respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Mr. D.K.Garg, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit.

Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit and Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. These Affidavits stands  included in the SLP Paper Books. It is further submiited that pursuant to Court's order dated 21.09.2015,  notice was issued to concerned parties through Advocate, hence service is complete on I.A No 5 but no reply has been filed by the Advocates. It is futher submiited that Mr. D.K Garg, Advocate has filed an application for futher directions and the same has been registered as I. A No. 6. SLP(C) No. 28802/2011: It is submitted that there are four respondents. All the respondents are represented through Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit and the same stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed Rejoinder Affidavit so far. SLP(C) No. 28803/2011: It is submiited that both respondents are represented through Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit. Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed Rejoinder Affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper Books. SLP(C) No. 28805/2011: It is submiited that there are four respondents. All the respondents are represented through Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate and filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Counsel for the Petitioner has also rejoinder affidavit. Both Affidavits stands included in the SLP Paper Books. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in all the matters. The matters alongwith applications above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 01 st   day of February , 2016.                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:      Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv.     Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.                Ms. Rani Chhabra, Adv.     Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.     Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv                                                                                                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 5/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (For further directions and office report) Date : 21/09/2015 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Adv. Dr. Indra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mrs. Rani Chhabra, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Let reply be filed within two weeks. List the matter after two weeks. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Renu Diwan) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                          LISTED ON :  21.09.2015        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA        Court No.    :  14    CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION          Item No.     :   1 INTERLOCATORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for further direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOs. 28801 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ETC.   ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. ETC.   ...RESPONDENTS                  OFFICE REPORT  The SLP above mentioned along with connected matters was lastly listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.02.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Post the matters on 4 th  March, 2014.” It is submitted that Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 has filed an application for further directions and the same has been registered as I.A. No. 5 and the same stands included in the SLP Paper Books.  Service of show cause notice is complete. The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 18 th  day of September, 2015.                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Adv. Mr. D.K. Garg, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. Ms. Rani Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv                                                                                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S1

x ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 5/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28801/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (For further directions and office report) Date : 21/09/2015 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Adv. Dr. Indra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mrs. Rani Chhabra, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Let reply be filed within two weeks.Signature Not Verified List the matter after two weeks.Digitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.09.2317:56:45 ISTReason: (Nidhi Ahuja) (Renu Diwan) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

vITEM NO.205 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions,permission to file additional documents,impleadment and prayer for interim relief and office report)(For final disposal)WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)(For final disposal)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With appln. directions and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)(For final disposal)Date: 10/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Sishodhiya, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. L.S. Bakshi, Adv. Mr. M.S. Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra ,Adv Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ram Krishna, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. - 2 - Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Milan Laskar, Adv. Mr. Mir Imtiyaz, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post the matters on 4th March, 2014.

[RAJNI MUKHI] [USHA SHARMA] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.MM-11 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions, impleadment, permission to fileadditional documents and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 17/01/2014 This Petition was MENTIONED today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, AOR Mrs. Rani Chhabra, AOR (Mentioned by) Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 10th February, 2014, before the appropriate Bench.|(Chetan Kumar) | |(Savita Sainani) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |

\ITEM NO.203 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions,impleadment,permission to file additionaldocuments and prayer for interim relief and office report)(for finaldisposal)WITHSLP(C) NO.28802/2011, SLP(C) NO.28803/2011, SLP(C) NO.28805/2011(with office report) (for final disposal)Date: 21/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad,AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,AOR Mrs Rani Chhabra,AOR UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The cases are adjourned. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Court Master || | | |

¬ITEM NO.205 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and permission to file additional documentsand with prayer for interim relief and office report)(For final disposal)With I.A.No.5 (Appln. for directions)WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)(For final disposal)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With appln.(s) for directions and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)(For final disposal)Date: 20/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, AOR Mrs Rani Chhabra, AOR Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, AOR Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the case on 21.10.2013. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

:ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and permission to file additional documentsand with prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)Date: 01/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv. Mr.Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr.Rajeev Dhawan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr.Manoj Saxena, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these cases in the month of March, 2013 in the category of`Final Disposal Matters'. Shri Dinesh Kumar Garg, learned counsel appearing for some ofthe respondents says that his clients have not been paid salary. ShriPallav Shishodia, learned senior counsel representing the State says thatthe statement made by Shri Garg is not correct. Without going into the correctness or otherwise of thestatement made by Shri Garg, we give liberty to such of the respondents whohave not been paid salary to file an application for consideration of theCourt whether a direction should be issued for payment of salary.

(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

6ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment,permission to file additional documents andprayer for interim relief and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)Date: 10/12/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad,AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,AOR Mrs Rani Chhabra,AOR Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, AOR Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these petitions on 01.02.2013. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Court Master || | | |

\226 1ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH,LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and permission to file additionaldocuments and with prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)Date: 07/05/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Adv. Mr.Kunal Verma, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,A.O.R. (Not Present)For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, A.O.R.(Not Present) Mr.Manoj Saxena, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, A.O.R.(Not Present) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mrs.Rani Chhabra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners says that he has beenrecently engaged by the State but the relevant records have not 2been made available to him. He is hopeful that the things will getstreamlined during the vacation of this Court and requests for anadjournment. The cases are adjourned. To be taken up in August, 2012.

(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

lITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents andoffice report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)Date: 03/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vibhu Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjeev Tayal,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand ,Adv Mr. Saqib Haroon,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete in all the matters. The contesting respondents have filed their counter affidavits. No request from any other respondent. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

XITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents andoffice report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)Date: 21/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhananjay Garg,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand ,Adv Mr. Shuaib uddin,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.28802/2011 service is complete. It is submitted that counter affidavit has been filed in SLP(C)No.28801/2011 and no separate counter affidavit is proposed to be filed. ...2/- Item No.40 : 2 : In SLP(C)No.28801/2011 respondent No. 3 to 5 have been served. No appearance for them. Respondent No. 2 granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matters on 3.4.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

HITEM NO.111 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28801/2011STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents andoffice report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 28802 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28803 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 28805 of 2011(With office report)Date: 09/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vibhu Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhananjay Garg,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mr. P.R. Vorgunti,Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.28801/2011 respondent No. 1 has filed Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Respondent No 2 has filed Vakalatnma. Granted four weeks time for filing ...2/- Item No.111 : 2 : counter affidavit. Counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that even though he has filed Vakalatnama but his name is not shown in the cause list. Update the data. Await return of notice of respondent No. 3 to 5. Counsel for the petitioner granted four weeks time for filing proof of dasti service. In SLP(C)No.28802/2011 service is complete. Respondent No. 1 and 3 have filed Vakalatnama. It is submitted that in the light of the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.1 in SLP(C)No.28801/2011 no separate counter affidavit is proposed to be filed. The remaining respondents may file their Vakalatnama and counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. In SLP(C)No.28803/2011 and 28805/2011 service is complete. Respondents have filed counter affidavit.

List the matters on 21.2.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

p 1ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 (CC 6306/2011)(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/200 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing O.T.and permission to file additional documents and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6721 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6746 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 7696 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 10/10/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Ashok H.Desai, Sr.Adv. Mr.Pallav Sisodia, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. Mrs.Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. Mr.Vibhu Tiwari, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr.Shuaib-Uddin, Adv. Mohd.Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr.Manoj Saxena, Adv. Dr.Kailash Chand, A.O.R.(Not Present) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mrs.Rani Chhabra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 2 Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable in 12 weeks. Dasti, in addition,is permitted. Issue notice on the petitioners' prayer for interimrelief, returnable in 12 weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. Shri D.K.Garg, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf

of respondent No.l in SLP(C)No....CC No.6306/2011 and respondentNo.3 in SLP(C)No....CC No.6721/2011. Issue notice to the remainingrespondents. Shri Shakil Ahmed Syed, learned counsel accepts notice onbehalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in SLP(C)No....CC No.6746/2011 andrespondent Nos.1 to 4 in SLP(C)No....CC No.7696/2011. Issue noticeto the remaining respondents. In the meanwhile, the proceedings of the contempt casespending before the High Court shall remain stayed. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

6 1ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 (CC 6306/2011)(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No.187/2009of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH,LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing O.T.and permission to file additional documents and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6721 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6746 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 7696 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 26/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Ashok H.Desai, Sr.Adv. Mr.Pallav Sishodia, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. Mr.Vibhu Tiwari, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mrs.Rani Chhabra, Adv. Ms.Vibha Narang, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the hearing, Shri Dinesh Kumar Garg, learned counselappearing for some of the respondents-caveator stated that the 2special leave petition filed by the State of Uttarakhand in similarmatter has been dismissed. He has made over copies of the judgmentof the High Court and the order passed by this Court to Shri AshokH.Desai, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of UttarPradesh. Shri Desai requests for a short adjournment. List the cases on 10.10.2011.

(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

\204ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 6306/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009of The HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)IA NO.1(c/delay in filing SLP, exemption from filing O.T.,permissionto file additional documents and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6721 of 2011IA 1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6746 of 2011IA 1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 7696 of 2011IA 1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 01/08/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTUFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, A.O.R. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, A.O.R. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the State of U.P. requests for an adjournment on the ground that the learned counsel who is to argue the case is in personal difficulty. Adjourned for four weeks.(A.D. Sharma) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Court Master

\204ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 (CC 6306/2011)(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH,LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and permission to file additionaldocuments and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6721 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6746 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 7696 of 2011With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 04/07/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASOK KUMAR GANGULYFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Ravi P.Mehrotra, Adv. Mr.Vibhu Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr.Shuaib-Uddin, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel forthe petitioners, hearing of these petitions is adjourned for fourweeks. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

,ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 7696/2011(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 862/2009of The HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH AT LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHASMATH ULLAH & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASOK KUMAR GANGULYFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, Sr.Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra,Adv. Mrs. Malvika Trivedi, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Shuaibuddin, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioners, hearing of this case is adjourned. To be listed in July, 2011 with SLP(C)...CC No.6306 of 2011. (A.D. Sharma) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 (CC 6306/2011)(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2010 in SA No. 187/2009of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH,LUCKNOW)STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 21/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASOK KUMAR GANGULYFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra,Adv. Mr.Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counselfor the petitioners, hearing of this petition is adjourned for fourweeks.( Satish K.Yadav ) ( Phoolan Wati Arora ) Court Master Court Master