ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 18/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR Mrs. Neelam Chand, Adv. Mr. Anurag, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Addl. Govt.Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AOR Mr. Nitin S Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We do not find any legal and valid ground to entertain this special leave petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
\232ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court OfBombay)SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder and interim relief and office report)Date : 18/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR Mrs. Neelam Chand, Adv.Mr. Anurag, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Addl. Govt.Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AORMr. Nitin S Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard learned counsel for the petitioner.We do not find any legal and valid ground toentertain this special leave petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly,dismissed.Pending applications stand disposed of.[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 21/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag, Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin S Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after three weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ÎITEM NO.42 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court OfBombay)SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder and interim relief and office report)Date : 21/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag, Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin S Tambwekar, Adv.Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList after three weeks.[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 30/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AOR Mr. Nitin S. Tambwejar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, two weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
`ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court OfBombay)SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder and interim relief and office report)Date : 30/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AORMr. Nitin S. Tambwejar, Adv.Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs prayed, two weeks' time is granted tolearned counsel for the petitioner to file rejoinderaffidavit.List thereafter.[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Suscheel Tomar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AOR Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to respondent No. 1 to verify whether the respondent has received the amount and to file appropriate affidavit in this regard. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Suman Jain ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
SECTION IIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.)NO. 2993 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 6229 OF 2015 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA . ..PETITIONER VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 5 th August, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Two weeks’ time is granted to file counter affidavit. List thereafter. ” It is submitted that no one has filed Counter Affidavit so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter abovementioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office Report. DATED this the 23 rd day of August , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, Advocate 2. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Advocate 3. Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1/rc
4ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court OfBombay)SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder and interim relief and office report)Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Suscheel Tomar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AORMr. Nitin S. Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs a last chance, four weeks' time is grantedto respondent No. 1 to verify whether the respondenthas received the amount and to file appropriateaffidavit in this regard.List thereafter.[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Suman Jain ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date :05/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR Mr. Anurag, adv. Mr. saket Bisani, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AOR Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted to file counter affidavit. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
SECTION IIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.)NO. 2993 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 6229 OF 2015 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA . ..PETITIONER VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20 th April, 2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice to examine the question as to whether the trial court can be directed to apply the ratio in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 9 SCC 129 as to the satisfaction of the trial court. In the meanwhile there shall be stay of further proceedings.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to both the respondents through Registered A.D. Post. It is submitted that M/s. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru and Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocates have filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2, respectively. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter abovementioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office Report. DATED this the 4 th day of August , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, Advocate 2. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Advocate 3. Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1/rc
öITEM NO.53 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report)Date :05/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,AOR Mr. Anurag, adv.Mr. saket Bisani, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,AORMr. Nitin S. Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTwo weeks' time is granted to file counteraffidavit.List thereafter.[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr.Nitin S.Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both the respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report)Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr.Nitin S.Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RBoth the respondents have failed to file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, thematter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court asper rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 07/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No. 2 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 5.7.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report)Date : 07/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit.List again on 5.7.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to the respondent No. 2 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 7.4.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
t ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to the respondent No. 2 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 7.4.2016.Signature Not Verified (M V RAMESH)Digitally signed by RegistrarMadhu Grover MGDate: 2016.02.1716:29:19 SCTReason:
ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 10/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 24.9.2015 of this Court in respect of Respondent No.2. List again on 17.2.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
\214ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report)Date : 10/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the orderdated 24.9.2015 of this Court in respect of Respondent No.2.List again on 17.2.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 24/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Nitin S.Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, whereafter no further extension shall be given. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.2 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld.Standing counsel representing the State of Maharashtra. List the matter again on 10.12.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 24/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Anurag,Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Nitin S.Tambwekar,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, whereafter no further extension shall be given. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.2 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld.Standing counsel representingSignature Not Verified the State of Maharashtra.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.09.2611:25:09 TLTReason: List the matter again on 10.12.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 20/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Nitin S.Tambwekar,adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 seeks and is given four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.2. List the matter again on 24.09.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
È ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2993/2015 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and interim relief and office report) Date : 20/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. B. Sunita Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Nitin S.Tambwekar,adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 seeks and is given four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.2. List the matter again on 24.09.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.07.2116:17:54 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order and interim relief) Date : 20/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Ms. B. Sunita Rao, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice to examine the question as to whether the trial court can be directed to apply the ratio in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 9 SCC 129 as to the satisfaction of the trial court. In the meanwhile there shall be stay of further proceedings. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [RAJINDER KAUR] COURT MASTER
Ö ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2993/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2015 in WPCRL No. 3457/2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay) SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SAMI AHMED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order and interim relief) Date : 20/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Ms. B. Sunita Rao, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice to examine the question as to whether the trial court can be directed to apply the ratio in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 9 SCC 129 as to the satisfaction of the trial court. In the meanwhile there shall be stay of furtherSignature Not Verified proceedings.Digitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2015.04.2117:42:30 ISTReason: [KALYANI GUPTA] [RAJINDER KAUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER