ITEM NO.1622 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition (C) No. 721/2024 SATYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRIYANKA KHARE Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.64651/2024-STAY APPLICATION ) Date : 18-03-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Pathak, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar , AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In a matter of the present nature, we see no reason to accept the prayer made in the petition for transfer. However, taking into consideration the grounds as urged in the petition, petitioner is granted liberty to file an application to appear through virtual mode and examine outstation witnesses through Commission as and when required. If such prayer is made, the Family Court shall permit the same. With the said observations, transfer petition stands disposed of. Pending application (s) shall also stand disposed of. (RAJNI MUKHI) (DIPTI KHURANA) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SATYAM SINGH v. PRIYANKA KHARE
Supreme Court of India | Diary 10272/2024
Status
ROP - of Main Case
Decided On
18-03-2024
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
Petitioner
SATYAM SINGH
Respondent
PRIYANKA KHARE
Primary Holding
While a blanket transfer may be refused, courts may direct Family Courts to permit parties to appear via virtual mode and examine outstation witnesses through Commission as a suitable alternative remedy.