1 ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3136/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/03/2015 in CRLMC No. 988/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) PRADEEP SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 24/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. P. Mishra, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has filed this special leave petition after the offence is compounded between the parties and while quashing the proceedings, the High Court looking into the conduct of the petitioner and the allegations against him has imposed cost of Rs. 40,000/- upon him. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we modify the impugned order insofar as the cost is concerned.
2 The petitioner shall now pay Rs. 5,000/- as cost instead of Rs. 40,000/-. With the aforesaid modification in the cost only, the special leave petition is disposed of. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER
$ 1 ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3136/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/03/2015 in CRLMC No. 988/2015 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) PRADEEP SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 24/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. P. Mishra, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has filed this special leave petition after the offence is compounded between the parties and while quashing the proceedings, the High Court looking into the conduct of the petitioner and the allegations against him has imposed cost of Rs. 40,000/- upon him.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushil Kumar RakhejaDate: 2015.04.2914:05:21 ISTReason: Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we modify the impugned order insofar as the cost is concerned. 2The petitioner shall now pay Rs. 5,000/- as cost instead ofRs. 40,000/-. With the aforesaid modification in the cost only, thespecial leave petition is disposed of.
(S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER