ò IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL D.NO(s).10263 OF 2013UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSGEETHA K PILLAI Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard. There is an inordinate delay of 803 days in thefiling of this application for grant of leave to appeal.An application for condonation of delay has no doubt beenfiled but the same does not, in our opinion, offer anycogent reasons for condoning such a long delay. The application for condonation of delay isaccordingly dismissed and so also the application for grantof leave to appeal as time barred. .............................J. (T.S. THAKUR) .............................J. (C. NAGAPPAN)NEW DELHIDATED 08th May, 2014.ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL D.NO(s). 10263 OF 2014 (For Preliminary Hearing)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSGEETHA K PILLAI Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for leave to appeal U/S 31(1) of the Armed ForcesTribunal Act, 2007 and office report)Date: 08/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Indira Jainsing,ASG Mr. R. Bala,Adv. Ms. Anindita Pujari,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. There is an inordinate delay of 803 days in thefiling of this application for grant of leave to appeal.An application for condonation of delay has no doubt beenfiled but the same does not, in our opinion, offer anycogent reasons for condoning such a long delay. The application for condonation of delay isaccordingly dismissed and so also the application for grantof leave to appeal as time barred. (Mahabir Singh) (Saroj Saini) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)