M JAYAMMA . v. UNION OF INDIA .

ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.16 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) [ONLY IA NO. 40538/2023 IN CA NO. 8390/2011 IS LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM] Date : 28-07-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr.Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Ms. Shalini, Adv. Mr. Arshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR UPON mentioning the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) No. 18147/2013 List in due course. (RASHI GUPTA) (SAPNA BANSAL) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) [ONLY IA NO. 40538/2023 IN CA NO. 8390/2011 IS LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM] WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IA No. 40538/2023 - APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNDERTAKING) Date : 04-04-2025 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Manavi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Ms. Nisha Bagchi,Sr. Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nisha Bagchi,Sr. Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR 1

Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA No. 40538/2023 The applicants are the members of the first appellant-Association. The prayers made in the application are for permitting the applicants to withdraw the undertaking given pursuant to the order of this Court and also to get itself disassociated from the association. The application has been filed in view of the fact that the applicants have availed the benefit of the scheme known as Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. As requirement for availing the scheme is of non-pendency of any litigation, we allow the application in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) which read thus: “a) permit the Applicant-Globus Stores Private Limited to withdraw its Affidavit of Undertaking dated 08.11.2011 filed before this Hon’ble Court in Civil Appeal No.8390 of 2011; 2

b) permit the Applicant – Globus Stores Private Limited to disassociate itself from the Appellant Association limited to the implications under the captioned Civil Appeal No.8390 of 2011;” (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 3

ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA NO.40538/2023 – FOR PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF UNDERTAKING) - MENTIONED Date : 06-03-2025 This application was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Applicant(s): Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s): UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R IA NO.40538/2023 (FOR PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF UNDERTAKING) IN C.A. No. 8390/2011 List on 4 th April, 2025. (ASHISH KONDLE) (AVGV RAMU) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) [ONLY IA NO. 191963/2024 IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 IS LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM] WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA No. 191963/2024 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION) Date : 15-01-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s): Mr. E.C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Manavi Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s): Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Tijil Thakur, Adv. For M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR 1

Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA NO.191963/2024 (CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION) IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 The applicant-Sapphire Foods India Limited has filed on record a document showing that the applicant is no longer a member of the appellant-M/s. Retailers Association of India. In view of what is stated in the Application, we allow the Application in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus: “(a) permit the Applicant to withdraw the Affidavit of Undertaking dated 31 st October, 2011 and disassociate itself from the Appellant, RAI so far as the present Appeal is concerned;” We, however, make it clear that in view of this order, the applicant will not be entitled to the benefit of interim or final order passed in the Civil Appeal. (ASHISH KONDLE) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) ([ONLY IA NO. 182194/2022 AND IA NO. 191963/2024 IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 IS LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM]) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IA No. 191963/2024 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 182194/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) Date : 03-01-2025 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Appellant(s) Ms. Nisha Bagchi,Sr. Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Applicant(s) Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Tijil Thakur, Adv. For M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Nisha Bagchi,Sr. Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR 1

Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA No. 191963/2024 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION The learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that the applicant will file an affidavit stating that the applicant is not a member of the appellant- Association. To enable the applicant to file an affidavit, list on 15 th January, 2025. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 2

ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) With Civil Appeal No.8390/2011 (IA No.182194/2022 - IMPLEADMENT IA No.191963/2024 - FOR DIRECTIONS/CLARIFICATIONS) Date : 18-12-2024 These applications were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Nandita Chauhan,Adv. (Mentioned by) For M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R IA No.182194/2022 - IMPLEADMENT IA No.191963/2024 - FOR DIRECTIONS/CLARIFICATIONS List these applications on 3 rd January, 2025. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV-A (MENTIONING) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA No.191963/2024 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION) - MENTIONED Date : 13-09-2024 This application was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Applicant(s) Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co, AOR For Appellant(s) For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R IA NO.191963/2024 ( CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION) IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 List on 20 th September, 2024. (ASHISH KONDLE) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) ([ONLY C.A. No.6561/2019, C.A. No.8390/2011 AND IA NO.87065/2024 IN C.A. No. 8390/2011 ARE LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM] ) WITH C.A. No. 6561/2019 (XVII-A) IA No. 89932/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) IA No. 87065/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS Date : 27-08-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Appellant(s) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Manavi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G. Mrs. Nisha Bagchi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. G S Makkar, AOR,

2 For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Prashant Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ravindra S. Garia, AOR Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. Ms. Akshita Chand, Adv. Mr. Madan Chandra Karnatak, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. Ms. Ginita Bodani, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv. M/s Khaitan & Co., AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No.87065/2024 in C.A. No.8390/2011 The present applicant is a member of the appellant - association. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that the appeal has been preferred even on behalf of the present applicant. As the applicant wants to take the benefit of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, we permit the applicant to withdraw C.A. No.8390 of 2011 insofar as the claim of the applicant only is concerned. I.A. No.87065/2024 is accordingly disposed of. I.A. No.182194 of 2022 in C.A. No.8390 of 2011 be listed on next date of hearing i.e. 20 th September, 2024.

3 C.A. No. 6561/2019 List on 20 th September, 2024 (KAVITA PAHUJA) (AVGV RAMU) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.201 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV-A BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL LOK ADALAT PROCEEDING OF Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 33666/2018 (XIV) Date : 29 th July, 2024 PRESENT : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA MR. KAPIL SIBAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE MR. VIPIN NAIR, ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD For Appellant(s) Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G. (Not Present) Mr. Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Chandrasekhar Bharthi, Adv. Ms. Sunita Rao, Adv. Ms Anamika Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. G S Makkar, Aor, For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR

Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR A W A R D SLP (C) NO 33666/2018 1 The dispute between the parties has been referred for determination to the Lok Adalat. 2 The tax effect of the subject matter of the special leave petition is falling below the threshold contained in the circular dated 22 August 2019 of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. 3 The Special Leave Petition is disposed of as not pressed. 4 Court fee be refunded as per rules. ………………………………………… ………………………………………… [Vipin Nair, AOR] [Kapil Sibal, Sr Adv] ………………………………………….J ………………………………………….J [Manoj Misra] [J B Pardiwala] …………………………………………….CJI [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]

ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) ([ONLY C.A. No.6561/2019 AND C.A. No.8390/2011 ARE LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM..] ) WITH C.A. No. 6561/2019 (XVII-A) (IA No. 89932/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA NO.4/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING UNDERTAKING, IA NO.2/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING UNDERTAKING, IA NO.8/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING UNDERTAKING, IA NO.48691/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT, IA NO.49187/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT, IA NO.50799/2020 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT, IA NO.158783/2021 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA NO.182194/2022 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA NO.40525/2023 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA NO.40538/2023 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION AND IA NO.87065/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 10-07-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Appellant(s) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Manavi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, AOR Mrs. Nisha Bagchi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Mr. G S Makkar, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR 1

Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv. For M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra S. Garia, AOR Mr. Prashant Pandey, Adv. Ms. Akshita Chand, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find that an incomplete copy of order dated 6 th May, 2024 is kept on the file. The Registrar (Judicial Listing) to take note of this. List C.A. Nos. 6561/2019 and 8390/2011 along with IA No. IA NO.87065/2024 in C.A. No. 8390/2011 on 27 th August, 2024. (ASHISH KONDLE) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. NO.63323 OF 2024 IN/AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.3046/2023 MYRAYASH HOTELS PVT.LTD. APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RESPONDENTS O R D E R 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. I.A. No.63323 of 2024 is disposed of. ......................J. ( ABHAY S. OKA ) ......................J. ( UJJAL BHUYAN ) NEW DELHI; 6 th MAY, 2024

2 ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH Diary No(s). 25785/2019 (XVII-A) (Office report for Directions for issuance of notice to the respondent IA No. 125711/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL IA No. 125716/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) Diary No(s). 21552/2019 (XVII-A) (Office report for Directions for issuance of notice to the respondent) C.A. No. 7501/2009 (IV-C) C.A. No. 8391-8393/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 8397/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 8428/2011 (IX) IA No. 3/2011 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 9589/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 7139/2012 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 33666/2018 (XIV) SLP(C) No. 2748/2019 (IV-B) C.A. No. 6559-6560/2019 (XVII-A) IA No. 69130/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 6561/2019 (XVII-A) IA No. 89932/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 111/2020 (XVII-A) IA No. 89567/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY IA No. 89568/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

3 C.A. No. 6676/2019 (XVII-A) IA No. 123967/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 7434/2019 (XVII-A) IA No. 134594/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY) C.A. No. 1143-1144/2021 (XIV-A) IA No. 110490/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 193682/2022 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON) C.A. No. 3046/2023 (III) IA No. 68345/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 49859/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 63323/2024 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) C.A. No. 9032/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9021/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9025/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9023/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9024/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9022/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) (FOR ON IA 88145/2011 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 71963/2020 IA No. 71963/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) C.A. No. 9028/2011 (XIV-A) (FOR FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 6824/2020) C.A. No. 9031/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 9030/2011 (XIV-A) FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 71941/2020 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 77124/2020 IA No. 77124/2020 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 71941/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) C.A. No. 1459/2012 (IX) ( FOR ON IA 105154/2011) C.A. No. 1461/2012 (IX) ( FOR ON IA 105685/2011) C.A. No. 1460/2012 (XIV-A)

4 C.A. No. 1232/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1233/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 300/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1035/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1456/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1031/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 11358/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 306/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 305/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 307/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2621/2012 (IX) ( FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2012 FOR ON IA 3/2012 FOR ON IA 5566/2012 IA No. 2/2012 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 308/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 11195/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2143/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2057/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2738/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2059/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2597/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2740/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 846/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2192/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2193/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2194/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2195/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1479/2012 (XIV-A)

5 C.A. No. 1475/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 2739/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3165/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3345/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 1361/2011 (XIV-A) ( FOR ON IA 8251/2011) C.A. No. 1323-1344/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1351-1358/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1350/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1346/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1360/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1348/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 4486/2010 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1359/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 1347/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 4011/2011 (IV) (FOR ON IA 17521/2011) C.A. No. 3402/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3801/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3404/2012 (IV) (FOR ON IA 17365/2012 FOR ON IA 30204/2012) C.A. No. 5870/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 4290/2012 (XIV-A) SLP(C) No. 9288/2013 (XIV) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2013 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA 2/2013 FOR ON IA 3/2013 IA No. 1/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 2/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE

6 DEFECTS) C.A. No. 5691/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 5690/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 557/2013 (XV) C.A. No. 286/2013 (XII-A) ( FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2013 FOR ON IA 114514/2012 IA No. 2/2013 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2680/2013 (XII-A) SLP(C) No. 11398/2013 (IX) ( FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2013 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2013 IA No. 1/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 2/2013 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 11399/2013 (IX) ( FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2013 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2013 IA No. 1/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 2/2013 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 11396/2013 (IX) ( FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2013 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2013 IA No. 1/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 2/2013 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) C.A. No. 4193/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 4007/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 240/2016 (IV) C.A. No. 241/2016 (IV) FOR ON IA 14566/2011) C.A. No. 242-243/2016 (IV) (FOR ON IA 92368/2013) C.A. No. 244/2016 (IV) C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) ( FOR ON IA 88118/2011 FOR ON IA 106364/2011 FOR ON IA 108651/2011

7 FOR ON IA 110924/2011 FOR ON IA 962/2012 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING UNDERTAKING ON IA 2/2013 FOR ON IA 59221/2013 FOR ON IA 58918/2013 FOR ON IA 6/2013 FOR ON IA 100406/2013 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING UNDERTAKING ON IA 8/2013 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 48691/2020 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 49187/2020 FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT ON IA 50799/2020 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 122865/2020 FOR impleading party ON IA 158783/2021 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 158783/2021 FOR impleading party ON IA 182194/2022 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 182194/2022 FOR impleading party ON IA 40525/2023 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 40525/2023 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 40538/2023 IA No. 50799/2020 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT IA No. 40538/2023 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 8/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING UNDERTAKING IA No. 2/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING UNDERTAKING IA No. 122865/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 49187/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 48691/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 158783/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 40525/2023 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 182194/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) C.A. No. 8878/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 9029/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 9733/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 11441/2011 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3167/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3305/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3172/2012 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3359/2012 (XIV-A) SLP(C) No. 18147/2013 (XV) SLP(C) No. 20640/2013 (XV)

8 C.A. No. 5006/2014 (XII-A) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 3/2014 IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 2/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (IV-B) C.A. No. 6405/2014 (IV) C.A. No. 11109/2016 (XIV-A) ( FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 50811/2017 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 51334/2017 IA No. 51334/2017 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION IA No. 50811/2017 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 1470/2017 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 3504/2017 (III) C.A. No. 124/2018 (III) Date : 06-05-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Ms. Vagisha Kochar, AOR Mr. Prashant Manchanda, Adv. Mr. Angad Singh, Adv. Ms. Nancy Shah, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Arnav Narain, AOR Ms. Nilofar Khan, AOR Mr. Anjum Parvez, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gaurav, Adv. Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR M/S. Dua Associates, AOR

9 Mr. L.k. Bhushan, Adv. Ms. Raashi Beri, Adv. Mr. Mohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.B. Rama Subba Raju, Adv. Mr. Gopinath E.P., Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jayant S, Adv. Ms. Shalaka Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, Adv. Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Adv. Ms. Neha Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Umang Motiyani, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Pal, Adv. Ms. Falguni Gupta, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv. Mr. Gajanan N Tirthkar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Raj Singh Chouhan, Adv. Mr. Luv Kumar, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Soumik Ghosal, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, AOR Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Arijit Sarkar, Adv. Ms. Nabeela Jamil, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR Ms. Deepali Nanda, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR

10 Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shiv Verma, Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Abhijeet Varshney, Adv. Mr. Darshan Sejwal, Adv. Mrs. Shilpa G Mittal, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar, AOR Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Mr. Neeraj Singh, Adv. Mrs. Soma Mullick, Adv. Ms. Banani Sikdar, Adv. Mr. Sebat Kumar Deuria, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Dhananjay Kataria, Adv. Mr. R. Parthasarathy, AOR Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, AOR Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Deepanshu, Adv. Ms. Devina Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Himani Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Parth Sarathi, Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Vikram Singh, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Joshi, Adv. Mr. Ashu Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR

11 Ms. Saman Ahsan, Adv. Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Srijata Majumdar, Adv. Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Tijil Thakur, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Manavi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Ms. Sayani Bhattcharya, Adv. Mr. Abhiraj Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. Mr. Shashi Kant, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi, AOR Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR Mr. Karma Dorjee, Adv. Mr. Dechen Wangadi Lachungpa, Adv. Ms. Adya Shree Dutta, Adv. Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varun Satiya, Adv. Mr. Abhay Jadeja, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Roy, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Kumar Shashank, Adv. Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G. Mrs. Nisha Bagchi, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv.

12 Mr. S. Thennavan, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatt, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Alishan Naqvee, Adv. Ms. Rupal Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR Mr. Anshay Dhatwalia, Adv. Ms. Vidhi Jain, Adv. Ms. Jasmine Damkewala, AOR Mr. Saurabh Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Vaishali Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Mohanty, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das,, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, AOR Mr. Shibu Devasia Olickal, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh, AOR Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Mr. A. K. Singla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, AOR Mrs. Rimpy Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mrs. Jasvinder Kaur Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, AOR Mrs. Mahima Bhardwaj Kalucha, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jha, Adv.

13 Mr. Shubham Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Ram Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jageer Singh Dhankar, Adv. Mrs. Niharika Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Anita Chahar, Adv. M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Thapa, Adv. Mr. Tarun Johri, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Dhananjay Kataria, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anand Sukumar, AOR Mr. S. Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Adv. Mrs. Ruche Anand, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. G. Natarajan, Adv. Mr. Anant Gautam, Adv. Mr. Samir Mudgil, Adv. Ms. Anani Achumi, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shivani Sagar, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sarin, Adv. Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Adv. Mr. Dinkar Kalra, AOR Mr. K.Parameshwar, AOR Ms. Kanti, Adv. Mr. Chinmay Kalgaonkar, Adv.

14 Ms. Raji Gururaj, Adv. M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR Mr. Bankey Bihari Sharma, AOR Mr. Neeraj Aarora, AOR Mr. Abhishek, AOR Mrs. Rani Chhabra, AOR Mr. Prakash Shah, Adv. Mr. Jas Sanghvi, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. Yuyanthar Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, AOR Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Adv. (Item No.47.35 for R.52 and 56) Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. Mr. T.L. Garg, AOR Mr. B.L. Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Ms. Niharika, Adv. Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Mr. Yamini Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the entire group of matters after the decision of the larger Bench in the case of Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. vs. M/s. Steel Authority of India & Ors. (Civil Appeal Nos. 4056-4065 of 1999 and batch). On the request made by learned counsel appearing for the

15 interveners, cases at Sl.No.47.12 i.e. C.A. No.6561/2019 and Sl. No. 47.92 i.e. C.A. No.8390/2011 shall be listed on 10 th July, 2024. Item No.47.17 – I.A. No.63323/2024 in/and C.A. No.3046/2023 The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of signed order in C.A. No.3046 of 2023 which is placed on the file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (KAVITA PAHUJA) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 ITEM NO.1708 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only IA No. 37634 and 37590 of 2024 in CA 8390/2011 to be listed before Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. ) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA No. 37590/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) (IA No. 37634/2024 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) Date : 06-03-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Prakash Shah, Adv. Mr. Rajat Mittal, AOR Mr. Suprateek N, Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) brings to the notice of this Court the order dated 03.12.2021 passed in

2 Civil Appeal No.4487 of 2010 along with the connected matters, wherein a similar prayer, as presently made, has been considered as follows; “I.A Nos. 67307, 67312,67314 and 67317 of 2020 The above four applications have been filed by different members of the Appellant Association seeking withdrawal of the undertaking given pursuant to the order of this Court and also to get them disassociated from the Appellant Association limited to the implications. The said applications have been filed in view of the fact that the present applicants have availed the benefit of the Scheme known as Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that to avail the benefit of the above Scheme, mandatory requirement is of non-pendency of any litigation. Learned counsel for the respondent, Union of India has no objection to these applications being allowed, as it is an admitted position that the four applicants have availed the aforesaid Scheme, 2019. Accordingly, all the above four applications are allowed.” In that view of the matter, the application seeking for impleadment/ intervention is allowed and consequently, application for directions is also allowed in the above terms. (NISHA KHULBEY) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. Nos.7501/2009, 8391-8393/2011 C.A. No. 8397/2011 (OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE JUDGE-IN-CHAMBERS ONLY IN C.A. NO. 8397 AND 9023 OF 2011) C.A. Nos. 9021/2011, 9023/2011, 8428/2011, 9022/2011, 9589/2011, 7139/2012 SLP(C) No. 33666/2018 SLP(C) No. 2748/2019 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) C.A. No. 6559-6560/2019 (IA No. 69130/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 6561/2019 (IA No. 89932/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 111/2020 ([OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION] IA No. 89567/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY IA No. 89568/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Diary No(s). 21552/2019 (IA No.131594/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.131591/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.131596/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING) C.A. No. 6676/2019 (IA No. 123967/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) Diary No(s). 25785/2019 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.125716/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.125711/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) C.A. No. 7434/2019 (IA No. 134594/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY) 1

C.A. No. 1143-1144/2021 (IA No.110489/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.110490/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) C.A. Nos.3046/2023, 9032/2011, 9025/2011, 9024/2011 C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IA No. 71963/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) C.A. No. 9028/2011 (FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 6824/2020) C.A. No. 9031/2011 C.A. No. 9030/2011 (FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 68538/2020) C.A. Nos. 1459/2012, 1461/2012, 1460/2012, 1232/2012, 2621/2012, 1233/2012, 300/2012, 1035/2012, 1456/2012, 846/2012, 1031/2012, 11358/2011, 306/2012, 305/2012, 307/2012, 308/2012, 11195/2011, 2143/2012, 2057/2012, 2738/2012, 2059/2012, 2597/2012, 2192/2012, 2193/2012, 2194/2012, 2195/2012, 1479/2012, 1475/2012, 2739/2012, 3165/2012, 3345/2012, 1361/2011, 1323-1344/2011, 1350/2011, 1346/2011, 2740/2012, 3402/2012, 3801/2012, 3404/2012, 5870/2012, 3665/2012, 4290/2012, 9288/2013, 5691/2012, 5690/2012, 557/2013, 286/2013 C.A. No. 2680/2013 (LIST ALONG WITH MAIN MATTER CA 9589/2011) SLP(C) Nos.11398/2013, 11399/2013, 11396/2013 C.A. Nos.4193/2011, 1351-1358/2011, 1360/2011, 1348/2011, 4486/2010 1359/2011, 1347/2011, 240/2016, 4011/2011, 241/2016, 242-243/2016, 244/2016, 3167/2012, 3305/2012, 3172/2012, 3359/2012 SLP(C) Nos.18147/2013, 20640/2013 C.A. No. 5006/2014 (List alongwith Main Matter Civil Appeal No. 1351-1358 of 2011) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (The matter will list before Hon'ble Court along with CA no. 8390 of 2011) C.A. Nos. 6405/2014, 4007/2011 C.A. No. 8390/2011 (FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 105393/2023 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 105417/2023) 2

C.A. No. 8878/2011 (ONLY C.A.NO.3504/2017 TO BE LISTED ON 25.7.2017 c.a.no. 6405/2014 is ready matter.) C.A. Nos.9029/2011, 9733/2011, 11441/2011, 11109/2016, 1470/2017, 3504/2017 and 124/2018 Date : 16-01-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Ruchir Bhatia,Adv. Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, AOR Mr. Deepanshu,Adv. Mr. Shivam Sharma,Adv. Ms. Devina Bhandari,Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Dhananjay Kataria, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Mr. Akshat Mahajan, Adv. 3

Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mrs. Saman Ahsan, Adv. Ms. Srijata Majumdar, Adv. Ms. Nikitha Shenoy, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Adv. For M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR Ms. Sonakshi Malhan, Adv. Mr. Sajal Jain, Adv. Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. Mr. Shashi Kant, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, AOR Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, AOR Mr. M.B.Rama Subba Raju, Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Arnav Narain, AOR Ms. Nilofar Khan, AOR Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. L.K. Bhushan, Adv. For M/S. Dua Associates, AOR 4

Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran,Adv. Ms. Apeksha Mehta,Adv. Ms. Neha Choudhary,Adv. Ms. Umang Motiyani,Adv. Ms. Falguni Gupta,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. R. Parthasarathy, AOR Mr. M.Gireesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ankur S.Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR Ms. Monisha Handa, Adv. Mr. Rajul Shrivastav, Adv. Mr. Anubhav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Mr. Kunal Kishore, Adv. Mr. Soumik Ghosal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv. Mr. Gajanan N Tirthkar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Raj Singh Chouhan, Adv. Mr. Luv Kumar, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Arijit Sarkar, Adv. Ms. Nabeela Jamil, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, AOR Mr. Sandeep Singh Dingra, Adv. Mr. Sandeepsingh Dingra, Adv. Mr. Dinesh S. Badiar, Adv. Mr. Madhu Sudan Singh, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sawal, Adv. Mrs. Nirmala Singh, Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR 5

Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR Ms. Aishvarya, Adv. Ms. Deepali Nanda, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shiv Verma, Adv. Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Muskan Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. For M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Rohan Darade,Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Mrs. Soma Mullick, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Singh, Adv. Ms. Banani Sikdar, Adv. Mr. Sebat Kumar Deuria, Adv. Mr. Anil Rana, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Abhijeet Varshanay, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Shilpa G Mittal, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari,Adv. Ms. Rooh-e-hina Dua,Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. S A Haseeb, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Ms. Alishan Naqvee,Adv. Ms. Rupal Bhatia,Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR Ms. Iti Sharma,Adv. 6

For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das,, Adv. Ms. Shivani Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. A. K. Singla, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rimpy Gupta, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, AOR Mr. Jay Savla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Prakash Shah, Adv. Mr. Jas Sanghavi, Adv. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mrs.Neetu Sharma,Adv. Mr. Nitin Pal,Adv. Mr. Shibu Devasia Olickal, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh, AOR Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Bankey Bihari, AOR Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Birendra Bikram, Adv. Mr. Kartikeya Gautam, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR 7

Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR Mr. Anant Gautam, Adv. Mr. Samir Mudgil, Adv. Ms. Anani Achumi, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shivani Sagar, Adv. Mr. R. P. Daida, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR Mr. Dinkar Kalra, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sarin, Adv. Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Adv. Mr. Puneet Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Hemlata Rawat, Adv. Ms. Manshi Khurana, Adv. Mr. Chetan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, AOR Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Lal Pratap Singh,Adv. Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh,Adv. Mr. Arjun Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Aditya,Adv. Mr. Vishal Singh,Adv. Ms. Sejal Jain,Adv. Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, AOR Mrs. Mahima Bhardwaj Kalucha, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Shubham Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Ram Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jageer Singh Dhankar, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Mr. Tarun Johri, AOR 8

Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja,Adv. Ms. Akansha Thapa,Adv. Ms. Devang Kumar,Adv. Ms. Megha Dugar,Adv. For M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. K.Parameshwar, AOR Ms. Kanti, Adv. Ms. Arti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Chinmay Kalgaonkar, Adv. M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Neeraj Aarora, AOR Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR Mr. Abhishek, AOR Mrs. Rani Chhabra, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, AOR Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are informed that this group of matters will have to await the decision of a larger Bench in the case of Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. v. M/s. Steel Authority of India & Ors. (Civil Appeal Nos. 4056-4064 of 1999 and batch) which is scheduled to be listed in March, 2024. 9

In the matters where service is not complete, the Registry will issue fresh notices. Dasti service is permitted. For the time being, we adjourn this group till 6 th May, 2024. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 10

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (ONLY IA. NOS. 105417/2023 AND 105393/2023 IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 TO BE LISTED) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 105393/2023 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 105417/2023 IA No. 105417/2023 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 105393/2023 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) Date : 20-10-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. N. Venkatraman, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. S.a. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosgh Subramaniyam, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Abhay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Kumar Visalaksh, Adv. Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. 1

Mr. Gopal Mundhra, Adv. Ms. Ginita Bodani, Adv. Mr. Arihant Tater, Adv. Mr. Ajitesh Dayal Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NO. 105393/2023 IN C.A. No. 8390/2011 The applicant is impleaded as party appellant. The application is, accordingly, allowed. I.A. NO.105417/2023 IN C.A. No. 8390/2011 This application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii), which are extracted below:- “(i) Pass an order effecting the withdrawal of the claims and privileges of the Applicant under the aforesaid appeal to the extent it relates to the Applicant: (ii) Pass an order disassociating the Applicant from the Applicant Association limited to the implications under the captioned appeal” (NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANJU KAPOOR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

1 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (ONLY IA. NOS. 105417/2023 AND 105393/2023 IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 TO BE LISTED.) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA No. 105417/2023 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION AND IA No. 105393/2023 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) Date : 13-10-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. N. Venkatraman, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. S.a. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosgh Subramaniyam, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. Kumar Visalaksh, Adv.

2 Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. Mr. Gopal Mundhra, Adv. Ms. Ginita Bodani, Adv. Mr. Arihant Tater, Adv. Mr. Ajitesh Dayal Singh, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA Nos. 105417/2023 and 105393/2023 List these applications next week. (DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (LIST ONLY I.A.NO.60700/2023 IN C.A.NO.8390/2011 ON 10.04.2023 AS PER CHIEF JUSTICES COURT MENTIONING DATED 29.03.2023 ) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) ( FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 60700/2023) Date : 07-08-2023 This matter was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Mundhra,Adv. Ms. Ginita Bodani,Adv. Ms. Akanksha Dikshit,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NOS.105417 & 105393/2023 IN C.A. NO.8390/2011 List after two weeks. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANJU KAPOOR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6080/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-01-2020 in WP No. 715/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Bombay At Goa) MYRAYASH HOTELS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 68345/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 49859/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 18-04-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ishaan Patkar, Adv. Mr. Avi Tandon, Adv. Mr. Arnav Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. N. Venkataraman, A.S.G. Mr. Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rukhmani Bobde, Adv. Mr. V.C.Bharathi, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vijaynand Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Vivasvan Gautam, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. To be heard with C.A No.4487/2010 and other allied appeals. It is clarified that there is no stay against the recovery and it will be open for the Revenue to recover the tax in accordance with law and on its own merits. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA No. 60700/2023 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 67254/2020 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) Date : 10-04-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Appellant(s) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. N. Venkatraman, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. S.a. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosgh Subramaniyam, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. Ms. Ginita Bodani, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA NO. 60700/2023 IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The respondents are directed to comply with Section 127(8) of 1

the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (“SVLDRS”) insofar as the applicant – Timezone Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., is concerned. 3. The application is, accordingly, allowed. IA NO. 67254/2020 IN C.A. NO. 8390/2011 1. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant(s) seeks permission to withdraw this application. 2. Permission is granted. 3. The application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANJU KAPOOR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ATUL M. KURHEKAR Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) ([ONLY CA NO. 9028 of 2011 ARE TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR] ) WITH C.A. No. 9028/2011 (XIV-A) (FOR FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 6824/2020 IA No. 6824/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 03-03-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Kamal Kishor, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 9028/2011 Unregistered application for direction is allowed to be withdrawn in terms of letter dt.12.2.2020. ATUL M. KURHEKAR Registrar

ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) ([ONLY CA No. 1143-44 of 2021 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR] ) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA FOR impleading party ON IA 67254/2020 FOR impleading party ON IA 158783/2021 IA No. 158783/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 67254/2020 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) C.A. No. 1143-1144/2021 (XIV-A) ( IA No.110489/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.110490/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 24-01-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr Sumit Anchal, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Contd….

-2- Item no.4 Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Ms. Yashika Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv. Mr. T Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv. Mr. K V Girish Chowdary, Adv. Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv. Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 1143-1144/2021 Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 3 but none has entered appearance. Application filed by respondent no.2 for permission to appear and argue in-person on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 be processed as per rules. Parties may file statement of case, if any, within the stipulated period. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6080/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-01-2020 in WP No. 715/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay At Goa) MYRAYASH HOTELS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 68345/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 49859/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 27-07-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Mishra Raj Shikhar, Adv. Mr. Bikram Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Arnav Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Arijit Prasad LD ASG Mr. M.K.Maroria AOR Ms. Rukmini Bobde Adv Mr. Raghav Sharma Adv Mr. V.C. Bharathi Adv UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Put up on 06.09.2022. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6080/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-01-2020 in WP No. 715/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Bombay at Goa) MYRAYASH HOTELS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.49859/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 19-05-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avi Tandon, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Paatkar, Adv. Mr. Arnav Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Arijit Prasad LD ASG Mr. M.K.Maroria AOR Ms. Rukmini Bobde Adv Mr. Raghav Sharma Adv Mr. Rajeev K Ranjan Adv Mr. V.C. Bharathi Adv UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Put up on 27.07.2022. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (NISHA TRIPATHI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6080/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-01-2020 in WP No. 715/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Goa) MYRAYASH HOTELS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.49859/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 04-05-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avi Tandon, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Patkar, Adv. Mr. Arnav Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. N.Venkataraman ASG Mr. Arijit Prasad, ASG Mr. M.K.Maroria, AOR Ms. Rukmini Bobde Adv Mr. Raghav Sharma Adv Mr. V.Chandra Shekara Bharathi Adv UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Put up on 19.05.2022. In the meantime, learned ASG to file Counter affidavit on behalf of Union of India on or before 12.05.2022. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, to be filed on or before 18.05.2022. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (NISHA TRIPATHI) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6080/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-01-2020 in WP No. 715/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Goa) MYRAYASH HOTELS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.49859/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 13-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avi Tandon, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Patkar, Adv. Mr. Arnav Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let one advance copy be served on Shri N. Venkataraman, learned ASG, who may take the instructions in the matter and file the counter affidavit. Put up on 04.05.2022. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER

1 ITEM NO.9 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) ([ONLY IA NOS. 157311/ 2021 AND 26711/2021 IN CA NO. 8390/2011 ARE LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM.] ) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA No. 157311/2021 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 26711/2021 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) Date : 10-02-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Appellant(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal,Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia,Adv. Ms. Ayushi Amod, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. N. Venkatraman, Ld.ASG, Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, Adv Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv Mr. Sughosh Subramaniam, Adv Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Aaditya Vijay kumar,Adv Mr. Aneesh Sidhwani, Adv Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

2 IA No.157311/2021 We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The respondents are directed to comply with Section 127(8) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 ("SVLDRS") insofar as the applicant - Spencer’s Retail Ltd, is concerned. The application is, accordingly, allowed. IA No.26711/2021 We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The respondents are directed to comply with Section 127(8) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 ("SVLDRS") insofar as the applicant - Connaught Plaza Restaurant Pvt. Ltd., is concerned. The application is, accordingly, allowed. IA No.122864/2020 IA No. 122864/2020 is taken on board . We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The respondents are directed to comply with Section 127(8) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 ("SVLDRS") insofar as the applicant – Witco (India) Pvt. Ltd., is concerned. The application is, accordingly, allowed. (Geeta Ahuja) (Anand Prakash) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.801     Court 1 (Video Conferencing)          SECTION XIV­A                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal  No.4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              Appellant(s)                                 VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD.                                      Respondent(s) (Only IA NO. 67254/20 (IMPLEADMENT) IN CA NO. 8390/2011 to be listed)   WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 67254/2020, FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 67307/2020, FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 67312/2020, FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 67314/2020 &  FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 67317/2020)   Date : 08­02­2022 This appln. was orally mentioned today. CORAM :           HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA          HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Appellant(s) Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv.(Orally mentioned by)                     Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR                     Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR                    For Respondent(s)                     Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR                     Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR                     Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R IA NO.157311/2021 IN CA NO. 8390/2011:­ The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Upon being orally mentioned by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeking listing of IA No.157311 of 2021 in Civil Appeal  No. 8390/2011   for   withdrawal  of   the   appeal,    the

­2­ Registry is directed to list the said matter on 10­2­2022 before an appropriate Bench.   (VISHAL ANAND)                                  (R.S. NARAYANAN) ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                           COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 ITEM NO.55 Court 15 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (I A NOS. 67307, 67312, 67314 AND 67317 OF 2020 ALONGWITH IA NO. 67254/ 20 (IMPLEADMENT) IN CA NO. 8390 and CA NO. 9026 OF 2011 ) WITH C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 71963/2020 IA No. 71963/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) IA No. 67314/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 67312/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 67307/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 67317/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 67254/2020 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) Date : 03-12-2021 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH [IN CHAMBER] For Parties : Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR For UOI Mr. Pranay Ranjan Adv Mr. M.K.Maroria AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 9026/2011 No one appears for petitioner(s) in C.A. No. 9026/2011.

2 C.A. No.8390/2011 Mr. Udit Jain, learned counsel is represented in C.A. No. 8390/2011. IA No.67254/2020 : List this application for impleadment again on 10.12.2021 for further clarification. IA Nos. 67307, 67312, 67314 and 67317 of 2020 : The above four applications have been filed by different members of the Appellant Association seeking withdrawal of the undertaking given pursuant to the order of this Court and also to get them disassociated from the Appellant Association limited to the implications. The said applications have been filed in view of the fact that the present applicants have availed the benefit of the Scheme know as Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that to avail the benefit of the above Scheme, mandatory requirement is of non- pendency of any litigation. Learned counsel for the respondent, Union of India has no objection to these applications being allowed, as it is an admitted position that the four applicants have availed the aforesaid Scheme, 2019. Accordingly, all the above four applications are allowed. (JATINDER KAUR) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.18 Court 9 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (IA NO. 67254 OF 2020 (IA FOR IMPLEADMENT) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8390 OF 2011 and IA No. 71963 of 2020 (application for partial withdrawal of undertaking) in C.A. No. 9026 of 2011 are to be listed BEFORE JUDGE-IN-CHAMBERS. ) WITH C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) (FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 71963/2020) C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA No. 67254/2020 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) C.A. No. 111/2020 (XVII-A) (IA No. 89567/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY and IA No. 89568/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 12-11-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Pranay Ranjan Adv. Mr. M.K.Maroria AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Advocate Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Advocate Ms. Shweta Kabra, Advocate Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate for M/S. Khaitan & Co. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR Mr. Katik Jindal, Adv. Mr. Anant Gautam, Adv 1

Mr. Nipun Sharma, Adv Mr. Ravi Solanki, Adv. M r. Udit Jain, Adv. Mr. Kumar Visalaksh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Mundhra, Adv. Ms. Ginita Bodani, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz A. Nazki, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 8390/2011 Let I.A. Nos. 67307, 67312, 67314 and 67317/2020 be listed along with IA No. 67254/2020 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT after a week. IA 71963/2020 in C.A. No. 9026/2011 List the application after a week. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (PRADEEP KUMAR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER 2

1 ITEM NO.1 Court 7 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) ([ ONLY I.A.NO.101716/2020 IN C.A.NO.8390/2011 IS LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM ] ) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (IA NO. 101716/2020 IN CA NO. 8390/2011 MENTIONED IA No. 101716/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 02-09-2021 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI For the parties: Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Shaishir Divatia, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. N. Venkataraman, ASG Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, Adv Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramaniyam, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA No. 101716/2020 We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The respondents are directed to comply with Section 127 (8) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (“SVLDRS”) insofar as the applicant-Trent Hypermarket Pvt. Ltd., is concerned. The application for directions is accordingly allowed. (NEELAM GULATI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

CA 111/2020 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 111 of 2020 Commissioner of Service Tax Appellant(s) Versus Ceebros Properly Development Respondent(s) W I T H Civil Appeal No 114-116 of 2020 O R D E R 1 The Office Report dated 25 August 2021 indicates that in Civil Appeal No 111 of 2020, the tax effect is Rs 6.13 crores. Hence, the civil appeal would have to be retained on the file and would be tagged with Civil Appeal No 7434 of 2019. Mr G Natarajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that the companion appeal pertains to the same assessee and involves the same issue. 2 However, the revenue shall deposit the ad valorem court fee to rectify the deficiencies which have been noticed in the Office Report within a period of four weeks.

CA 111/2020 2 3 In Civil Appeal Nos 114-116 of 2020, the total tax effect is Rs 1.84 crores. 4 Since the tax effect is below the threshold of Rs 2 crores, Civil Appeals 114- 116 of 2020 are disposed of on account of low tax effect keeping the question of law open. … .....…...….......………………........J. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud] ..…....…........……………….…........J. [M R Shah] New Delhi; August 27, 2021 CKB

CA 111/2020 3 ITEM NO.1 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.111/2020 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX Appellant(s) VERSUS CEEBROS PROPERLY DEVELOPMENT Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for IA No. 89567/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY, IA No.89568/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION) WITH C.A. Nos.114-116/2020 (XVII-A) (With appln.(s) for STAY APPLICATION ON IA 113055/2019, WITHDRAWAL OF CASE/APPLICATION ON IA 107343/2020) Date : 27-08-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH For Appellant(s) Mr. N. Venkataraman, ASG Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Vishakha, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. G. Natarajan, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR Mr. Kartik Jindal, Adv. Mr. Anant Gautam, Adv.

CA 111/2020 4 Mr. Nipun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Madhur Tewatia, Adv. Mr. Ravi Solanki, Adv. Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Adv. Ms. Mounica Kasturi, Adv. Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No 111 of 2020 1 The Office Report dated 25 August 2021 indicates that in Civil Appeal No 111 of 2020, the tax effect is Rs 6.13 crores. Hence, the civil appeal would have to be retained on the file and would be tagged with Civil Appeal No 7434 of 2019. Mr G Natarajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that the companion appeal pertains to the same assessee and involves the same issue. 2 However, the revenue shall deposit the ad valorem court fee to rectify the deficiencies which have been noticed in the Office Report within a period of four weeks. Civil Appeal Nos 114-116 of 2020 1 The appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order. 2 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (CHETAN KUMAR) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) A.R.-cum-P.S. COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.801 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No.8390/2011 (IX) (IA NO. 101716/2020 IN CA NO. 8390/2011 MENTIONED) Date : 26-08-2021 This IA was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Appellant(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr.Adv.(Mentioned by) Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R IA No. 101716/2020 In C.A. No.8390/2011 The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. On a mention being made by Mr. Kavin Gulati, learned senior counsel for the applicant/appellant, we direct the Registry to list the above-mentioned I.A. on 27.08.2021 before an appropriate Bench. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.5 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 22001/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-07-2019 in RP No. 187/2019 12-12-2018 in WP(C) No. 949/2018 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS RUCHI GOYAL & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.110489/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.110490/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 05-04-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Shyam Gopal, Adv. Ms. Suhasini Sen, Adv. Mr. M.K.Maroria AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. To be heard along with C.A. No. 5690 of 2012. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER

CORRECTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.71432 OF 2020 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 216/2012 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.71434 OF 2020 PJL CLOTHING (INDIA) LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. NO.71432 OF 2020 is allowed. As a consequence, application for exemption from filing notarized affidavit is closed as unnecessary. .................... J ( V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN ) NEW DELHI; 18 th JANUARY, 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.71432 OF 2020 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 216/2012 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.71434 OF 2020 PIL CLOTHING (INDIA) LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. NO.71432 OF 2020 is allowed. As a consequence, application for exemption from filing notarized affidavit is closed as unnecessary. .................... J ( V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN ) NEW DELHI; 18 th JANUARY, 2021

ITEM NO.10 Court 13 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only Civil Appeal No. 216 of 2012 along with IA 71432/2020 ) WITH C.A. No. 216/2012 (XIV-A) ( IA No. 71434/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 71432/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) Date : 18-01-2021 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN [IN CHAMBER] For the parties : Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. B.V. Balram Das, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA NO.71432 OF 2020 IN C.A NO. 216/2012 Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission is granted. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. NO.71432 OF 2020 is allowed. As a consequence, application for exemption from filing notarized affidavit is closed as unnecessary. (Geeta Ahuja) (Poonam Vaid) Court Master Court Master (Signed Order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.NO.83324 OF 2020 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3087-3088 OF 2015 VIVEK LIMITED APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Application for withdrawal of Civil Appeals is allowed. Accordingly, the Civil Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. ....................,J. ( V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN ) NEW DELHI JANUARY 04, 2021

ITEM NO.7 Court 13 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only Civil Appeal No. 3087-88 of 2015 before Hon'ble Judge-in- Chamber ) WITH C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 (XII) (FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 83324/2020 IA No. 83324/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) Date : 04-01-2021 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shaishir Divatia, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. Nos.3087-3088/2015: Application for withdrawal of Civil Appeals is allowed. Accordingly, the Civil Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. (RACHNA) (POONAM VAID) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH) (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.18 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).111/2020 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX Appellant(s) VERSUS CEEBROS PROPERLY DEVELOPMENT Respondent(s) (WITH IA No. 89567/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY, IA No. 89568/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) WITH C.A. No. 114-116/2020 (XVII-A) (WITH IA No. 113055/2019 - STAY APPLICATION, IA No. 107343/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) Date : 25-11-2020 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE For Appellant(s) Mr. N. Venkatraman, ASG Ms. Vishakha, Adv Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Kumar-I, AOR Mr. S. Jaikumar, Adv. Mr. Kartik Jindal, Adv. Mr. Anant Gautam, Adv. Mr. Nipun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar-i, AOR Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, AOR Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Advocate Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Advocate Ms. Mounica Kasturi, Advocate UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the appeals after two weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.10 Court 10 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only C.a No. 9026 of 2011 before Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber ) WITH C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) ( FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 75039/2020 IA No. 75039/2020 - AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE) Date : 09-10-2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Ms. Vanita Bhargava, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Abhay Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.75039 0f 2020 This is an application for amendment of cause title to change the name of the appellant company from “ Fame India Limited” to “Inox Leisure Ltd”. The necessity for amendment of the cause title has arisen on account of composite scheme of amalgamation sanctioned by the High Court of Gujarat. Hence this application is allowed. (JAGDISH KUMAR) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No(s). 14943 /2017 U.P. RAJYA KRISHI UTPADAN Appellant(s) MANDI PARISHAD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R Mr. E.C. Agrawala, learned counsel appears for the appellant – applicant. He submits that in terms of the “ Sabka Vishwas (legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 ” of the Government of India, the appellant wants to withdraw this appeal. In view of above and the prayer in the IA No. 85081 of 2020, the Civil Appeal stands disposed of as not pressed. The respondent is represented by Ms. Sunita Sharma, learned counsel. …………..............................J. [ HRISHIKESH ROY ] New Delhi; September 24, 2020.

ITEM NO.3 Court 9 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only C.a No. 14943 of 2017 before Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber ) WITH C.A. No. 14943/2017 (III-A) ( FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 85081/2020 IA No. 85081/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) Date : 24-09-2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Sunil Murarka, Adv. Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Civil Appeal No. 14943 of 2017 is disposed of as per the signed order. (JATINDER KAUR) (R.S. NARAYANAN) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH) [Signed Order in is placed on the file.]

ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION XIV - A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only Civil Appeal No. 14943 of 2017 for Ld. Registrar's Court ) WITH C.A. No. 14943/2017 (III - A) Date : 25 - 08 - 2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 14943/2017 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish correct address to effect service on respondent no.9 within two weeks time. List again on 12.10.2020. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

ITEM NO.1 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 40204/2020 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 48690/2020 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 49186/2020 IA No. 48690/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 40204/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 49186/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) C.A. No. 9030/2011 (XIV-A) ( FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 68538/2020 IA No. 68538/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION) Date : 05-08-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI Counsel for parties Mr. N. Venkataraman,ASG Mrs. Shirin Khajuria,Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Rishi Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal,Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Pankaj Gupta, AOR Ms. Rimpy Gupta,Adv. Ms. Vanita Bhargava,Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava,Adv. 1

Ms. Shweta Kabra,Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.NOS.49186, 48690, 40204 IN C.A.NO.8390/2011 AND I.A NO. 68538/2020 IN C.A NO. 9030/2011 There is no question of withdrawal of undertaking(s). These applications are misconceived and are, accordingly, dismissed. In case, applicant(s) want to enter in OTS. They may do so and submit the same before this Court, the effect thereof will be considered at the time of hearing. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (JAGDISH CHANDER) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. NO.186980 OF 2019 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11035 OF 2017 BCC DEVELOPERS & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR-1 RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R An application (I.A. NO.186980 OF 2019) has been filed by learned counsel for the appellant to withdraw the civil appeal in order to approach the concerned Authority to avail the benefit under the scheme “Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019” from the Central Excise & Service Tax Department. For the reasons stated in the application supported by an affidavit, application (I.A. NO.186980 OF 2019) is allowed. Accordingly civil appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty to the appellant to avail the benefit under the scheme “Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019”, if entitled. ..........................J. (R. BANUMATHI) NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 28, 2020.

2 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. Nos. 11035/2017, 6561/2019, 8397/2011 and 9023 of 2011 have to be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber ) WITH C.A. No. 8397/2011 (IX) (OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE JUDGE-IN-CHAMBERS ONLY IN C.A. NO. 8397 AND 9023 OF 2011) C.A. No. 9023/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 11035/2017 (XVII-A) (IA No. 74246/2017 - EX-PARTE STAY IA No. 186980/2019 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION) C.A. No. 6561/2019 (XVII-A) (IA No. 89932/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) Date : 28-02-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela,Adv. Mr. Nicholas Choudhury,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Gautam Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. A.R. Madhav Rao,Adv. Mr. Vinayak Kohli,Adv. Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Ankur Saboo,Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela,Adv. Mr. Nicholas Choudhury,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR

3 Mr. Akshay Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No.8397/2011 & Civil Appeal No.9023/2011 As per Office Report dated 11.02.2020, service of notice on the appellants in both the matters for making alternative arrangement is complete; but no one has entered appearance so far. In view of above, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee (SCLSC) shall nominate an advocate to appear and argue both the matters i.e. Civil Appeal No.8397/2011 & Civil Appeal No.9023/2011 on behalf of the appellants within two weeks. Thereafter, learned counsel so nominated by Supreme Court Legal Services Committee to take steps to complete service on the unserved respondents no.10 and 24 in Civil Appeal No.8397 of 2011 and unserved respondents no.1, 3, 4, 10, 14, 15 and 20. Civil Appeal NO.11035/2017 In terms of the signed order, the civil appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Civil Appeal No.6561/2019 : As per Office Report dated 27.02.2020 learned counsel for the appellant has filed spare copies on 20.02.2020 along with the application (IA No.32802/2020) for condonation of delay. As prayed, delay of 20 days in filing the spare copies of appeal papers is condoned. (MAHABIR SINGH) (BEENA JOLLY) AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER (Signed order in C.A.No. 11035/2017 is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.105, 105.1 COURT NO.1 SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 7501/2009 M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS (P.) LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA GOVT. OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 7139/2012 (XI-A) Date : 05-02-2020 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Appellant(s) Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur S Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. S. Partha Sarathi, Adv. Mr.Vijay Kumar, AOR Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, AOR (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Arijit Prasad, sr. Adv. Ms. Sunita Rani, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List along with C.A. No. 8878/2011 and connected matters after two weeks. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV - A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. Nos. 8391 - 93, 8397, 8428, 9021, 9023, 9024, 9025, 9026 and 9032 of 2011, C.A. No. 14943/2017, C.A Nos. 6559 - 6560/2019, 6561, 6676 and 7434 of 2019 and Diary Nos. 25785, 21552 of 2019 for listing before the Ld. Registrar Court ) WITH C.A. No. 8391 - 8393/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 8 397/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9032/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9021/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9025/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9023/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9024/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 8428/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 14943/2017 (III - A) ) C.A. No. 6559 - 6560/2019 (XVII - A) (IA No.69126/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.69130/2019 - STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 6561/2019 (XVII - A) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.89932/2019 - STAY APPLICATION and IA No.89930/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) D iary No(s). 21552/2019 (XVII - A) (IA No.131594/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.131591/2019 - EX - PARTE STAY and IA No.131596/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING [ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 13 I.E. D.NO.25785/2019. ]) C.A. No. 6676/201 9 (XVII - A) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.123967/2019 - STAY APPLICATION and IA No.123963/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.123966/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING)

- 2 - Item no.2 Diary No(s). 25785/2019 (XVII - A) (FOR ADMISSION and I .R. and IA No.125716/2019 - STAY APPLICATION and IA No.125711/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) C.A. No. 7434/2019 (XVII - A) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.134594/2019 - EX - PARTE STAY and IA No.134593/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) Date : 24 - 01 - 2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms Maithili Moondra, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr Yashraj Singh Bundola, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr Yashraj Singh Bundola, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mr Kartik Jindal, Adv. Mr Anant Gautam, Adv. Ms Sakshi Gaur, Adv. Mr Sorabh Dahiya, Adv. Mr Vibhu Sharma, Adv. Mr Nipun Sharma, Adv. Ms Garvita, Adv. Mr Anmol Mehta, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar - i, AOR Mr Na vandeep Matta, Adv. M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr Prabhat Kr Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Cou rt made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 8391 - 8393/2011 Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 7 to 10, 15 and 19. Reminder be issued. C.A. No. 8397/2011 Service is complete on the appellant(counsel dead) but none has entered appearance, as such, registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon’ble Judge in Chamber for orders.

- 3 - Item no.2 C.A. No. 9032/2011 Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent no.26. Reminder be issued. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars for effecting service on respondent nos. 17,20,24,25,30,33,38 to 40, 47 to 50, 54,55,65 to 67, 69, 71, 79 and 82 within two week s time as last opportunity. C.A. No. 9021/2011 All the respondents are duly served/represented. C.A. No. 9025/2011, C.A. No. 9024/2011, C.A. No. 9026/2011 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars for effecting ser vice on respective respondents in respective matters as per office report dt.22.1.2020 within two weeks time as last opportunity. C.A. No. 9023/2011 Ld. Counsel for appellant nos. 1 and 2 expired, as such, registry to process the matter for listing befor e the Hon’ble Judge in Chamber for orders. C.A. No. 8428/2011 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.18 within two weeks time as last opportunity. C.A. No. 14943/2017 Respondent nos. 1 to 6 are duly represen ted. Service is complete on respondent nos. 7,8 and 10 to 14 but none has entered appearance. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent no.9. Issue D.O. letter. C.A. No. 6559 - 6560/2019 Service is complete on the sole resp ondent but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee.

- 4 - Item no.2 C.A. No. 6561/2019 Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed spare copies. However, ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks seven days time to comply with the order. If spare copies are not filed within seven days time, registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon ’ble Judge in Chamber for orders. If spare copies are filed within seven days time, process as per rules. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee. Diary No(s). 21552/2019, Diar y No(s). 25785/2019 Fresh tagged matters. C.A. No. 6676/2019 Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee. C.A. No. 7434/2019 Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. Nos. 8390, 8391-93, 8397, 8428, 9021, 9022, 9023, 9024, 9025, 9026 and 9032 of 2011, C.A. No. 14943/2017 and CA. N0. 241 AND 240 OF 2016 for listing before the Ld. Registrar Court ) WITH C.A. No. 240/2016 (IV) (Not to be listed before Hon'ble Judge [A.K.Sikri] as per Court's order dated 20.09.2017) C.A. No. 241/2016 (IV) (Not to be listed before Hon'ble Judge [A.K.Sikri] as per Court's order dated 20.09.2017.) C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (AT TOP) C.A. No. 8391-8393/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 8397/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9032/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9021/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9025/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9023/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9024/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 8428/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9022/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 11035/2017 (XVII) ) C.A. No. 14943/2017 (III-A) )

-2- Item no.2 C.A. No. 6559-6560/2019 (XVII) (IA No.69126/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.69130/2019-STAY APPLICATION) C.A. No. 6561/2019 (XVII) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.89932/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.89930/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) Diary No(s). 21552/2019 (XVII) (IA No.131594/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.131591/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.131596/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING [ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 13 I.E. D.NO.25785/2019. ]) C.A. No. 6676/2019 (XVII) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.123967/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.123963/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.123966/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING) Diary No(s). 25785/2019 (XVII) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.125716/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.125711/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) C.A. No. 7434/2019 (XVII) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.134594/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.134593/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) Date : 16-10-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Ms Trishala Trivedi, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr Yashraj Singh Bundela, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr Navandeep Matta, Adv. M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr Shubham Narula, Adv. Ms Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR

-3- Item no.2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 8390/2011, C.A. No. 9022/2011 Complete matters. C.A. No. 8391-8393/2011 Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 7 to 10, 15 and 19 in C.A.No.8391/2011. Reminder be issued. C.A. No. 8397/2011 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 10 and 24 within two weeks time. Service is complete in respect of alternative arrangement in respect of appellant(counsel expired) but none has entered appearance. Await appearance. C.A. No. 8428/2011 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.18 within two weeks time. Certificate of service in respect of respondent no.19 has not been enclosed with the serving letter. Letter be issued to the High Court. C.A. No. 9021/2011 Application for substituted service in respect of respondent nos. 6,14 and 19 is allowed. Proof of publication be filed within four weeks time.

-4- Item no.2 C.A. No. 9023/2011 Issue fresh notice for alternative arrangement in respect of the appellant(counsel expired). C.A. No. 9024, 9025, 9026, 9032 of 2011 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars to effect service on respondent nos. 22,23 and 53 in C.A. No. 9024/2011, respondent no.6 in C.A. No. 9025/2011, respondent nos. 7,8,12,18 and 20 in C.A. No. 9026/2011, respondent nos. 17,20,24 to 27, 30,33,38 to 40, 47 to 50, 54,55,65 to 67, 69, 71, 79 and 82 in C.A. No. 9032/2011 within two weeks time. C.A. No. 14943/2017 Respondent nos. 1 to 6 are duly represented. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 7 to 14. D.O, letter already issued. Issue one more letter. List again on 24.1.2020. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.15 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 28343/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-09-2018 in ST No. 350/2010 passed by the Customs Excise And Service Tax Apellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai) COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE CHENNAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS CEEBROS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.134594/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.134593/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ) Date : 16-09-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Radhakrishna, Sr. Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 5690 of 2012. (MANISH SETHI) (BEENA JOLLY) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.13+57 COURT NO.14 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 25785/2019 COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GOLDEN CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.125716/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.125711/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ) WITH DIARY NO.21552/2019 IA No.131594/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.131591/2019-EX-PARTE STAY APPLICATION IA NO.131596/2019- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING Date : 02-09-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Appellant(s) Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv. Mr. Aditya Khorana, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters along with Civil Appeal No.5690 of 2012. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 21577/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-09-2018 in APP No. 42463/2015 passed by the Customs Excise And Service Tax Apellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai) COMMISSIONER OF GST AND C.E. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ASWINI APARTMENTS Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.123967/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.123963/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.123966/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ) Date : 26-08-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH For Petitioner(s) Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Debashish Bharuka, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Vyas, Adv. Ms. Nitya Rao, Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. It is submitted that on the second issue raised in the matter, another civil appeal, being C. A. No. 11109 of 2016 is pending. Replying upon the said statement, the instant matter is tagged with the above civil appeal. All the points are kept open, to be urged at the time of hearing. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 12224/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-09-2018 in AN No. 607/2012 26-09-2018 in AN No. 608/2012 passed by the Customs Excise And Service Tax Apellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai) COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE CHENNAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S CITILIGHTS PROPERTIES P.LTD Respondent(s) (IA No.69126/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.69130/2019-STAY APPLICATION ) WITH Diary No(s). 18781/2019 (XVII) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.89932/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.89930/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) Date : 16-08-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, S.G. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Rajt Nair, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Appeal admitted. To be heard along with C.A. No. 11109 of 2016, C.A. No. 11035 of 2017 and D. No. 22839 of 2017. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 12224/2019 COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S CITILIGHTS PROPERTIES P.LTD Respondent(s) (IA No.69126/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.69130/2019-STAY APPLICATION ) WITH Diary No(s). 18781/2019 (XVII) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.89932/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.89930/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) Date : 05-08-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Appellant(s) Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the appellant submits that Civil Appeal Diary No.25166 of 2019 against the relied upon judgment is listed before another Bench today. She prays for time. As prayed, list the matters after one week. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. Nos. 8390, 8391-93, 8397, 8428, 9021, 9022, 9023, 9024, 9025, 9026 and 9032 of 2011, C.A. No. 14943/2017 and CA. N0. 241 AND 240 OF 2016 for listing before the Ld. Registrar Court ) WITH C.A. No. 240/2016 (IV) (Not to be listed before Hon'ble Judge [A.K.Sikri] as per Court's order dated 20.09.2017) C.A. No. 241/2016 (IV) (Not to be listed before Hon'ble Judge [A.K.Sikri] as per Court's order dated 20.09.2017.) C.A. No. 8390/2011 (IX) (AT TOP) C.A. No. 8391-8393/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 8397/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9032/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9021/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9025/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9023/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9024/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 8428/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9022/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) ) C.A. No. 14943/2017 (III-A) ) Date : 10-07-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

-2- Item no.4 For Appellant(s) Ms Trishala Trivedi, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr Yashraj Singh Bundela, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr Navandeep Singh Matta, Adv. M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ALL MATTERS EXCEPT CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4487/2010 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on the unserved respondents within two weeks time. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of some of the unserved respondents. Issue D.O. letter. List again on 16.10.2019. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 12224/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-09-2018 in AN No. 607/2012 26-09-2018 in AN No. 608/2012 passed by the Customs Excise And Service Tax Apellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai) COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE CHENNAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S CITILIGHTS PROPERTIES P.LTD Respondent(s) (IA No.69126/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.69130/2019-STAY APPLICATION ) WITH Diary No(s). 18781/2019 (XVII) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.89932/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.89930/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) Date : 05-07-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, S.G. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, list the matter after four weeks. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 12224/2019 COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S CITILIGHTS PROPERTIES P.LTD Respondent(s) ( IA No.69126/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.69130/2019-STAY APPLICATION ) Date : 06-05-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Appellant(s) *Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel submits that there are other connected matters which ought to be listed together after the same are filed. Registry is directed list all the matters together after the ensuing summer vacation before appropriate Bench. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER * Appearance slip not given.

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).2748/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-09-2018 in WP No.23404/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS BALVINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) Date : 04-02-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, AOR Ms. Vandana Mishra, Adv. Mr. K. Vaijayanthi, Adv. Mr. Shailabh Pandey, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with Civil Appeal No.11109/2016. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (SANTOSH KUMAR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.33666/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-09-2018 in WPC No. 2104/2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUS VANNI KAPOOR & ORS. Respondent(s) (For interim relief) Date : 14-01-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Praveen, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No.11109 of 2016. (Chetan Kumar) (Anand Prakash) A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Civil Appeal No(s). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 846/2012 (XIV) Date : 29-08-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Tavish B Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, AOR Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Avinash Kumar, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr Ramesh Kr, Adv. Mr Anil Kathuria, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Aarora, AOR Mr Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Abhishek, AOR Mr. K.parameshwar, AOR Ms Suhani Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 4487/2010 Complete matter.

-2- Item No.4 C.A. No. 846/2012 Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 6 and 7 but none has entered appearance. Statement of case may be filed within the stipulated period. Registry to process the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 29.08.2018 hj

1 ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV/III/XII/XV/ IVB/XIIA/IX/IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. NO.1361/2011 C.A. NO.1323-1344/2011 C.A. NO.4193/2011 C.A. NO.1351-1358/2011 C.A. NO.1350/2011 C.A. NO.1346/2011 C.A. NO.1360/2011 C.A. NO.1348/2011 C.A. NO.4486/2010 C.A. NO.1359/2011 C.A. NO.1347/2011 C.A. NO.240/2016 C.A. NO.4011/2011 C.A. NO.241/2016 C.A. NO.242-243/2016 C.A. NO.244/2016 C.A. NO.8390/2011 C.A. NO.8391-8393/2011 C.A. NO.8397/2011 C.A. NO.9032/2011 C.A. NO.9021/2011 C.A. NO.9025/2011 C.A. NO.9023/2011 C.A. NO.9024/2011 C.A. NO.8428/2011 C.A. NO.9022/2011 C.A. NO.9026/2011 C.A. NO.9028/2011 C.A. NO.9031/2011 C.A. NO.9030/2011 C.A. NO.1459/2012 C.A. NO.1461/2012 C.A. NO.1460/2012

2 C.A. NO.9589/2011 C.A. NO.1232/2012 C.A. NO.11358/2011 C.A. NO.306/2012 C.A. NO.305/2012 C.A. NO.307/2012 C.A. NO.2621/2012 C.A. NO.308/2012 C.A. NO.216/2012 C.A. NO.11195/2011 C.A. NO.2143/2012 C.A. NO.2057/2012 C.A. NO.2738/2012 C.A. NO.1233/2012 C.A. NO.300/2012 C.A. NO.2059/2012 C.A. NO.2597/2012 C.A. NO.1035/2012 C.A. NO.1456/2012 C.A. NO.2740/2012 C.A. NO.846/2012 C.A. NO.2192/2012 C.A. NO.2193/2012 C.A. NO.2194/2012 C.A. NO.1031/2012 C.A. NO.3402/2012 C.A. NO.3802/2012 C.A. NO.2195/2012 C.A. NO.1479/2012 C.A. NO.1475/2012 C.A. NO.2739/2012 C.A. NO.3404/2012 C.A. NO.3167/2012 C.A. NO.3305/2012 C.A. NO.3172/2012 C.A. NO.3165/2012 C.A. NO.5870/2012 C.A. NO.3665/2012 C.A. NO.4290/2012 C.A. NO.3359/2012 C.A. NO.3345/2012 SLP(C) NO.9288/2013 C.A. NO.5691/2012 C.A. NO.5690/2012 C.A. NO.557/2013 C.A. NO.286/2013 C.A. NO.2680/2013 SLP(C) NO.11398/2013

3 SLP(C) NO.11399/2013 SLP(C) NO.11396/2013 SLP(C) NO.18147/2013 SLP(C) NO.20640/2013 C.A. NO.5006/2014 SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 C.A. NO.3087-3088/2015 C.A. NO.11109/2016 C.A. NO.1470/2017 C.A. NO.124/2018 (FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. AND IA NO.131707/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING AND IA NO.131710/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 05-04-2018 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For parties: Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv. Mr. K. Ajit Singh, Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Shubhayu Roy, Adv. Mr. Tavish Prasad, Adv. Ms. Saman Ahsan, Adv. Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR

4 Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Rony O John, Adv. Ms. Shweta Kabra, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Sasmita Tripathy, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv. Ms. Ayushi Gaur, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Adv. Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, AOR Mr. Akshat Malpani, Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Mr. Pratiush Pratik, Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Ms. Soma Mullick, Adv. Mr. Niraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Sebat Kumar Deuria, Adv. for M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Ms. Shruti Jose, Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Aditya Samaddar, Adv. Ms. Rimjhim Naudiyal, Adv.

5 Mr. L. Badri Narayanan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Karan Sachdev, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Mr. K. Sharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Nayan N., Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. Ms. Sanya Talwar, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi, AOR Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR Ms. Shruti Iyer, Adv. Ms. Sonakshi Malhan, Adv. Ms. Suriti Chowdhary, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag, AOR

6 Ms. Ruppal Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Shivali Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR Mr. Tanmay Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Adv. Ms. Kartika Sharma, Adv. Ms. Nattasha Garg, Adv. Mr. Chaitanya Madan, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar, AOR Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, AOR Mr. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. Mr. Bharat J. Joshi, Adv. Ms. Monisha Handa, Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Mr. L.K. Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Arun Kumar, Adv. for M/S. Dua Associates, AOR Ms. Nilofar Khan, AOR Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Avinash Kumar, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

7 Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, AOR Mr. Siddharth Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv. Mr. K. Parameshwar, AOR Mr. P. Sriram, Adv. Mr. Muralidhar Reddy, Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Ms. Deepti Sarin, Adv. Mr. Sahil Monga, Adv. Mr. Nakul Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Adv. for M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Adv. Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Chaurasia, Adv.

8 for M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv. Mrs. C.K. Sucharita, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sarin, Adv. Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Adv. Mr. Rohin Oza, Adv. Ms. Siya Minocha, Adv. Mr. Dinkar Kalra, AOR Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Misra, Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari, AOR Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh, AOR Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. Mr. Vineete Garg, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR Mrs. Rani Chhabra, AOR

9 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard the learned counsels for the parties at some length. The question arising is whether “service tax” under Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 on renting of immovable property or any other service in relation to such renting, for use in the course of or, for furtherance of, business or commerce is within the legislative competence of the Union Parliament. The above question is directly relatable to the scope and ambit of Entry 49 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India dealing with “Taxes on lands and buildings”. If the impost/levy is directly relatable to the lands/buildings contemplated in Entry 49 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India we would have had no hesitation in saying that the Union Parliament would lack legislative competence to enact the particular provision in the Finance Act, 1994. At this stage, we are unable to take the said view as has been advanced before us on behalf of the individual Assessees.

10 However, the arguments advanced may indicate that even if there is no direct nexus there may be an indirect one. Whether such indirect connection or relation would be of any relevance to decide the issue of legislative competence appears to be pending before a nine judges Bench of this Court on a reference made in an order in Mineral Area Development Authority and others vs. Steel Authority of India and others 1 . The questions referred are extracted below: “ 1. Having heard the matter(s) for considerable length of time, we are of the view that the matter needs to be considered by a Bench of nine Judges. The questions of law to be decided by the larger Bench are as follows: 1 . Whether “royalty” determined under Sections 9/15(3) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (67 of 1957, as amended) is in the nature of tax? 2 . Can the State Legislature while levying a tax on land under List II Entry 49 of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution adopt a measure of tax based on the value of the produce of land? If yes, then would the constitutional position be any different insofar as the tax on land is imposed on mining land on account of List II Entry 50 and its interrelation with List I Entry 54? 3 . What is the meaning of the expression “Taxes on mineral rights subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral 1 . (2011) 4 SCC 450

11 development” within the meaning of Schedule VII List II Entry 50 of the Constitution of India? Does the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 contain any provision which operates as a limitation on the field of legislation prescribed in List II Entry 50 of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India? In particular, whether Section 9 of the aforementioned Act denudes or limits the scope of List II Entry 50? 4 . What is the true nature of royalty/dead rent payable on minerals produced/mined/extracted from mines? 5 . Whether the majority decision in State of W.B. v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. [(2004) 10 SCC 201] could be read as departing from the law laid down in the seven-Judge Bench decision in India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N. [(1990) 1 SCC 12] ? 6 . Whether “taxes on lands and buildings” in List II Entry 49 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution contemplate a tax levied directly on the land as a unit having definite relationship with the land? 7 . What is the scope of the expression “taxes on mineral rights” in List II Entry 50 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution? 8 . Whether the expression “subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral development” in List II Entry 50 refers to the subject-matter in List I Entry 54 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution?

12 9 . Whether List II Entry 50 read with List I Entry 54 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution constitute an exception to the general scheme of entries relating to taxation being distinct from other entries in all the three Lists of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution as enunciated in M.P.V. Sundararamier & Co. v. State of A.P. [AIR 1958 SC 468 : 1958 SCR 1422] [AIR p. 494 : SCR at p. 1481 (bottom)]? 10 . Whether in view of the declaration under Section 2 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 made in terms of List I Entry 54 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution and the provisions of the said Act, the State Legislature is denuded of its power under List II Entry 23 and/or List II Entry 50? 11 . What is the effect of the expression “… subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral development” on the taxing power of the State Legislature in List II Entry 50, particularly in view of its uniqueness in the sense that it is the only entry in all the entries in the three Lists (Lists I, II and III) where the taxing power of the State Legislature has been subjected to “any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral development”?. 2. Before concluding, we may clarify that normally the Bench of five learned Judges in case of doubt has to invite the attention of the Chief Justice and request for the matter being placed for hearing before a Bench of larger coram

13 than the Bench whose decision has come up for consideration (see Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community v. State of Maharashtra [(2005) 2 SCC 673 : 2005 (SCC (L&S) 246 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 546] . However, in the present case, since prima facie there appears to be some conflict between the decision of this Court in State of W.B. v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. [(2004) 10 SCC 201] which decision has been delivered by a Bench of five Judges of this Court and the decision delivered by a seven-Judge Bench of this Court in India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N. [(1990) 1 SCC 12] , reference to the Bench of nine Judges is requested. The office is directed to place the matter on the administrative side before the Chief Justice for appropriate orders.” In view of the above, we are of the opinion that these matters should await the decision of the nine judges Bench whereafter the hearing of these matters will be taken up once again in the course of which it will be open for the parties to urge such additional points as may be considered relevant. The matter is accordingly deferred until disposal of the issues pending before the nine judges Bench in Mineral Area Development Authority and others (supra) . [VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER

1 ITEM NO.105 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV/III/XII/XV/ IVB/XIIA/IX/IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4487/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UTV NEWS LTD. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. NO.1361/2011 C.A. NO.1323-1344/2011 C.A. NO.4193/2011 C.A. NO.1351-1358/2011 C.A. NO.1350/2011 C.A. NO.1346/2011 C.A. NO.1360/2011 C.A. NO.1348/2011 C.A. NO.4486/2010 C.A. NO.1359/2011 C.A. NO.1347/2011 C.A. NO.240/2016 C.A. NO.4011/2011 C.A. NO.241/2016 C.A. NO.242-243/2016 C.A. NO.244/2016 C.A. NO.8390/2011 C.A. NO.8391-8393/2011 C.A. NO.8397/2011 C.A. NO.9032/2011 C.A. NO.9021/2011 C.A. NO.9025/2011 C.A. NO.9023/2011 C.A. NO.9024/2011 C.A. NO.8428/2011 C.A. NO.9022/2011 C.A. NO.9026/2011 C.A. NO.9028/2011 C.A. NO.9031/2011 C.A. NO.9030/2011 C.A. NO.1459/2012 C.A. NO.1461/2012 C.A. NO.1460/2012

2 C.A. NO.9589/2011 C.A. NO.1232/2012 C.A. NO.11358/2011 C.A. NO.306/2012 C.A. NO.305/2012 C.A. NO.307/2012 C.A. NO.2621/2012 C.A. NO.308/2012 C.A. NO.216/2012 C.A. NO.11195/2011 C.A. NO.2143/2012 C.A. NO.2057/2012 C.A. NO.2738/2012 C.A. NO.1233/2012 C.A. NO.300/2012 C.A. NO.2059/2012 C.A. NO.2597/2012 C.A. NO.1035/2012 C.A. NO.1456/2012 C.A. NO.2740/2012 C.A. NO.846/2012 C.A. NO.2192/2012 C.A. NO.2193/2012 C.A. NO.2194/2012 C.A. NO.1031/2012 C.A. NO.3402/2012 C.A. NO.3802/2012 C.A. NO.2195/2012 C.A. NO.1479/2012 C.A. NO.1475/2012 C.A. NO.2739/2012 C.A. NO.3404/2012 C.A. NO.3167/2012 C.A. NO.3305/2012 C.A. NO.3172/2012 C.A. NO.3165/2012 C.A. NO.5870/2012 C.A. NO.3665/2012 C.A. NO.4290/2012 C.A. NO.3359/2012 C.A. NO.3345/2012 SLP(C) NO.9288/2013 C.A. NO.5691/2012 C.A. NO.5690/2012 C.A. NO.557/2013 C.A. NO.286/2013 C.A. NO.2680/2013 SLP(C) NO.11398/2013

3 SLP(C) NO.11399/2013 SLP(C) NO.11396/2013 SLP(C) NO.18147/2013 SLP(C) NO.20640/2013 C.A. NO.5006/2014 SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 C.A. NO.3087-3088/2015 C.A. NO.11109/2016 C.A. NO.1470/2017 C.A. NO.124/2018 (FOR ADMISSION AND I.R. AND IA NO.131707/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING AND IA NO.131710/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 04-04-2018 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For parties: Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv. Mr. K. Ajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Shubhayu Roy, Adv. Mr. Tavish Prasad, Adv. Ms. Saman Ahsan, Adv. Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR

4 Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Rony O John, Adv. Ms. Shweta Kabra, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Sasmita Tripathy, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, AG [N/P] Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG [N/P] Mr. K. Radhakrishna, Sr. Adv. [N/P] Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv. Ms. Ayushi Gaur, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, AOR Mr. Akshat Malpani, Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Mr. Pratiush Pratik, Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Ms. Soma Mullick, Adv. Mr. Niraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Sebat Kumar Deuria, Adv. for M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Ms. Shruti Jose, Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. L. Badri Narayanan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Karan Sachdev, Adv.

5 Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Mr. K. Sharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. S. Jhanwar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. Ms. Sanya T., Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi, AOR Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR Ms. Shruti Iyer, Adv. Ms. Sonakshi Malhan, Adv. Ms. Suriti Chowdhary, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Ms. Ruppal Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Shivali Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Iti Sharma, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR

6 Ms. Kartika Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chaitanya Madan, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar, AOR Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, AOR Mr. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ns. Filza Moonis, Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Mr. L.K. Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Arun Kumar, Adv. for M/S. Dua Associates, AOR Ms. Nilofar Khan, AOR Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Avinash Kumar, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek, AOR Mr. Anil Nag, AOR

7 Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, AOR Mr. Siddharth Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv. Mr. Maneesh Pathak, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Shubham Awasthi, Adv. Mr. K. Parameshwar, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Ms. Deepti Sarin, Adv. Mr. Sahil Monga, Adv. Mr. Nakul Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Adv. for M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Adv. Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. for M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR

8 Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mrs. C.K. Sucharita, Adv. Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sarin, Adv. Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Adv. Mr. Rohin Oza, Adv. Ms. Siya Minocha, Adv. Mr. Dinkar Kalra, AOR Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, AOR Mr. Anurag Misra, Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari, AOR Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh, AOR Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR Mrs. Rani Chhabra, AOR

9 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters tomorrow i.e. 5 th April, 2018. [VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 37904/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-06-2017 in WP No. 1694/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay at Nagpur) ASHISH Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No.131707/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP and IA No.131710/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 08-01-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Tag with C.A. No. 8390/2011. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-cum-PS Court Master

ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011 M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 5691/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 5690/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 1361/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1323-1344/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 4193/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1351-1358/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1350/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1346/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1360/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1348/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 4007/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 4487/2010 (XIV) C.A. No. 4486/2010 (XIV) C.A. No. 1359/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1347/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 240/2016 (IV) C.A. No. 4011/2011 (IV) C.A. No. 241/2016 (IV) C.A. No. 242-243/2016 (IV) C.A. No. 244/2016 (IV) C.A. No. 8391-8393/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 8397/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9032/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9021/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9025/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9023/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9024/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 8428/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9022/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9026/2011 (IX) C.A. No. 9028/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 9031/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 9029/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 9030/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1459/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 9733/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1461/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 1460/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 9589/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 1232/2012 (XIV) 1

Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011 etc. C.A. No. 11358/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 306/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 305/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 307/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2621/2012 (IX) C.A. No. 308/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 216/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 11195/2011 (XIV) C.A. No. 2143/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2057/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2738/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 1233/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 300/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2059/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2597/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 1035/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 1456/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2740/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 846/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2192/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2193/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2194/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 1031/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3402/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3801/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2195/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 1479/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 1475/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 2739/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3404/2012 (IV) C.A. No. 3167/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3305/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3172/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3165/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 5870/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 4290/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3359/2012 (XIV) C.A. No. 3345/2012 (IX) SLP(C) No. 9288/2013 (XIV) C.A. No. 557/2013 (XV) C.A. No. 286/2013 (XII-A) C.A. No. 2680/2013 (XII-A) SLP(C) No. 11398/2013 (IX) SLP(C) No. 11399/2013 (IX) SLP(C) No. 11396/2013 (IX) SLP(C) No. 18147/2013 (XV) SLP(C) No. 20640/2013 (XV) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (XII-A) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (IV-B) C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 (XII) 2

Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011 etc. C.A. No. 11109/2016 (XIV) C.A. No. 1470/2017 (XIV) Date : 20-09-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For parties Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapur, Adv. Mr. Rony John, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. B. K. Prasad, Adv. Ms. Pooja Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha, Adv. Mr. Avi Tandon, Adv. Mr. Rohit Sthalekar, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, AOR Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR 3

Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011 etc. Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. L. Badri Narayanan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anupam Lal Das, AOR Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi, AOR Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR Ms. Shruti Iyer, Adv. Ms. Sonakshi Malhan, Adv. Ms. Suriti Chowdhary, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag, AOR Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR Mr. Naveen Kumar, AOR 4

Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011 etc. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, AOR Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, AOR Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Mohd. Wasay Khan, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. Mr. Vijay Chawla, Adv. Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Mr. L. K. Bhushan, Adv. M/s. Dua Associates, AOR Ms. Nilofar Khan, AOR Mr. Avinash Kumar, AOR Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Vivek Jain, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Abhishek, AOR Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Ms. Aakanksha Munjal, Adv. Ms. Manik Karanajawala, Adv. M/s. Karanjawala & Co., AOR 5

Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011 etc. Mr. Jay Savla, AOR M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR Mr. Krishan Kumar, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr. Pankaj Gupta, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR Mr. Dinkar Kalra, AOR Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, AOR Mr. Bankey Bihari, AOR Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh, AOR Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Kailash Chand, AOR Ms. Rani Chhabra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matters be listed before a Bench of which one of us (A. K. Sikri, J.) is not a member after taking orders from Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India. (NIDHI AHUJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 6

ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Civil Appeal No(s). 8878/2011 HOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY C.A.NO.3504/2017 TO BE LISTED ON 25.7.2017 C.A.No. 6405/2014 is ready matter.) WITH C.A. No. 3504/2017 (III) C.A. No. 6405/2014 (IV) Date : 25-07-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Soumik Ghosal, AOR Mr.Surender Singh,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal, AOR Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr.E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr.Chandra Prakash,Adv. Mr.Vivek Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.8878/2011 This is a ready matter. ......2

ITEM NO.35 -2- C.A. No. 3504/2017 Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the parties have not filed the statement of case within the statutory period. However, statement of case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules,2013. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In other matter file is not received. ( KAPIL MEHTA ) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Civil Appeal No(s). 3504/2017 M/S INDIABULLS PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS HEAD- INDIRECT TAXATION, MR. G. RAJENDRAN Appellant(s) VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-I. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 03/05/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Soumik Ghosal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H.K. Naik, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Affidavit of valuation and deficit Ad-valorem court fee have been filed/paid by the Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Four weeks' time is granted to the sole respondent for filing counter affidavit. Parties may file statement of case within the statutory period, as stipulated time is yet to expire. List again on 25.7.2017. (RAJESH KUMAR GOEL) Registrar

Listing date : 03.05.2017 Court No .  : R1 Item No.    : 62 SECTION­IIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL  NO. 3504 OF 2017 M/s Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd. Through ...Appellant(s) Its Head­Indirect Taxation, Mr. G. Rajendran ­Versus­ The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai­I                ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17 th  February, 2017 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:  “ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and  perused the relevant material. Leave granted. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellant for recovery of arrears of service tax due on or before 30 th September, 2011. We clarify that there is no stay of imposition of service tax under sub­clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar as the future liability towards service tax with effect from 1st  October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011. ” It is submitted that Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal was issued to sole respondent on 15.03.2017 through Speed Post. Mr. B. K. Prasad, Advocate has on 05.04.2017 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of sole respondent. It is further submitted that counsel for the appellant has on 28.04.2017 filed Affidavit of Valuation and Deficit/Ad­Valorem court fee of Rs. 55,000/­. Counsel for respondent has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. Both the parties have not filed Statement of Case so far. Time for filing the same has not yet expired. Service is complete. The matter along with application above­mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office Report.   Dated this the  02 nd  day of May, 2017.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Saumik Ghosal, Advocate Chamber No. 1, R.K Garg Block,  Supreme Court of India , New Delhi . 2. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section, Supreme Court of India,  New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR dm

äITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOELCivil Appeal No(s). 3504/2017M/S INDIABULLS PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS HEAD- INDIRECT TAXATION, MR. G. RAJENDRAN Appellant(s) VERSUSTHE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-I. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 03/05/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Soumik Ghosal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H.K. Naik, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RService is complete.Affidavit of valuation and deficit Ad-valorem court feehave been filed/paid by the Ld. Counsel for the appellant.Four weeks' time is granted to the sole respondent forfiling counter affidavit.Parties may file statement of case within the statutoryperiod, as stipulated time is yet to expire.List again on 25.7.2017. (RAJESH KUMAR GOEL) Registrar

1 ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Civil Appeal No. 9023/2011 PJL CLOTHING(INDIA) LTD. & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With Office Report) WITH C.A. No. 9024/2011 C.A. No. 9026/2011 C.A. No. 11358/2011 (With WITH Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 19/04/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Abhisaar Bairagi,Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Khairati, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 11358 of 2011 Opportunity to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

2 None appears for respondent Nos. 5,6,10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 despite due service. Spare copies alongwith address in respect of respondent Nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 have not been furnished despite last opportunity having been granted. Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers for further directions. C.A. No. 9023 of 2011 Await service/ track report in respect of alternative arrangement notice. For all 24 respondents – Await certificate of service from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. C.A. No. 9024 of 2011 Await certificate of service in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 40 and 42 to 53 from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. Opportunity to respondent No. 41 file counter affidavit has already been declined. C.A. No. 9026 of 2011 Await certificate of service in respect of all 20 respondents from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. List on 12 th July, 2017. (RAJESH KUMAR GOEL) Registrar

Listing date : 19.04.2017       Court  : R1                  Item No. : 1                     SECTION­IIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9023, 9024, 9026 AND 11358 OF 2011  PJL Clothing (India) Ltd. & Anr. Etc. Etc. ...Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC.        ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 21 st  March 2017, when the following order was passed: “ C. A. No. 9023 of 2011 Await certificate of service of respondents from the High Court  and  reminder be issued to this effect. Fresh alternative arrangement notice be issued to the appellant. C.A. No. 9024 of 2011 Await certificate of service of respondent Nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53 from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. Opportunity to respondent No. 41 to file counter affidavit has already  been declined. C.A. No. 9026 of 2011 Await certificate of service of respondent Nos. 1 to 20 from the  High  Court and reminder be issued to this effect. C.A. No. 11358 of 2011 Opportunity to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to file counter affidavit has  already been declined. None appears for respondent Nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20  and  21 despite due service. Last opportunity for taking fresh steps and furnish the complete  address of respondent Nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 within two weeks' time.  Notice thereafter be issued . List again on 19 th  April, 2017.” Civil Appeal No. 9023 of 2011 It is submitted that Mr. M.P. Jha,  Counsel for the Appellants  has expired. A fresh notice for alternative arrangement has already been issued to the appellants on 07.04.2015 but no one  has entered appearance so far. An another reminder to the High Court was issued on 29 th  March, 2017. Certificate of Service in respect of respondent nos. 1

1 to 24 has not been received so far. Service is not complete. Civil Appeal No. 9024 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 53 respondents in the matter. Respondent No. 41 is represented by counsel. An another reminder was issued to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on 06 th  April, 2017. Certificate of Service has not been received so far. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2011 It is submitted that an another reminder was issued to  High Court, Bombay  on 06 th  April, 2017  requesting therein to send  certificate of service  in  respect of  respondent nos. 1 to 20.  Certificate of Service has not been received so far. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 20. Civil Appeal No. 11358 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 21 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents except respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 & 19. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has not filed  Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4  and last opportunity is declined. Certificate of service has been received from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 but no one has filed  Vakalatnama/Appearance on their behalf. It is further submitted that the counsel for the appellant has not filed fresh and complete address in respect of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 alongwith copies of Petition of Appeal. Hence Notice could not be issued. Service in respect of Respondent No. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 is not complete. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 18 th  day of April, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate,  Central Agency Section, Supreme Court of India. 2. Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate 3. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48,  Lawyer's Chambers, Supreme Court of India . 4. M/s Khaitan & Co., Advocate                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR dm 2

1ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOELCivil Appeal No. 9023/2011PJL CLOTHING(INDIA) LTD. & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With Office Report)WITHC.A. No. 9024/2011C.A. No. 9026/2011C.A. No. 11358/2011(With WITH Interim Relief and Office Report)Date : 19/04/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Abhisaar Bairagi,Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Khairati, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A. No. 11358 of 2011 Opportunity to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to file counteraffidavit has already been declined.2None appears for respondent Nos. 5,6,10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20and 21 despite due service.Spare copies alongwith address in respect of respondent Nos. 7to 9, 14 and 19 have not been furnished despite last opportunityhaving been granted. Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'bleJudge-in-Chambers for further directions.C.A. No. 9023 of 2011Await service/ track report in respect of alternativearrangement notice.For all 24 respondents ⬠Await certificate of service from theHigh Court and reminder be issued to this effect.C.A. No. 9024 of 2011Await certificate of service in respect of respondent Nos. 1to 40 and 42 to 53 from the High Court and reminder be issued tothis effect.Opportunity to respondent No. 41 file counter affidavit hasalready been declined.C.A. No. 9026 of 2011Await certificate of service in respect of all 20 respondentsfrom the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect.List on 12 th July, 2017. (RAJESH KUMAR GOEL) Registrar

ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 9023/2011 PJL CLOTHING(INDIA) LTD. & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With Office Report) WITH C.A. No. 9024/2011 C.A. No. 9026/2011 C.A. No. 9030/2011 C.A. No. 11358/2011 C.A. No. 11109/2016 C.A. No. 9032/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 21/03/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Jeevan B. Panda, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Khairati, Adv. Ms. Neha Agawal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad Mr. Pankaj Gupta,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Null,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 9023 of 2011 Await certificate of service of respondents from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect.

Fresh alternative arrangement notice be issued to the appellant. C.A. No. 9024 of 2011 Await certificate of service of respondent Nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53 from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. Opportunity to respondent No. 41 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. C.A. No. 9026 of 2011 Await certificate of service of respondent Nos. 1 to 20 from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. C.A. No. 9030 of 2011 Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted as the further opportunity is declined. None appears for respondent Nos. 5,6,8,10,12,13,15,16,19 to 24, 27 to 29 despite due service. Registry to process the matter in terms of order dated 14 th February, 2017 for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No. 9032 of 2011 Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent Nos. 6-16, 18-19, 21-23, 28-29, 31-32, 34-37, 41-46, 51-53, 56-64, 68, 70, 72-78, 80-81, 83-116 despite due service. Last opportunity having been granted, fresh steps for service of respondent Nos. 17, 20, 24, 25, 30, 33, 38 to 40, 47 to 50, 54, 55, 65 to 67, 69, 71, 79 and 82 have not been taken, as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge

in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No. 11358 of 2011 Opportunity to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent Nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 despite due service. Last opportunity for taking fresh steps and furnish the complete address of respondent Nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 11109 of 2016 Counsel for the appellant has not filed affidavit of valuation despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers for further directions. List on 19 th April, 2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Listing date : 21.03.2017       Court  : R1                  Item No. : 3                    SECTION­IIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9023, 9024, 9026, 9030, 9032 & 11358 OF 2011 AND 11109 OF 2016 PJL Clothing (India) Ltd. & Anr. Etc. Etc. ...Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC.        ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 14 th February 2017, when the following order was passed: “ C.A. No.9023/2011 Await appearance of the appellant. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9024/2011 Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Reminder be issued. Opportunity to respondent no.41 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. C.A. No.9026/2011 Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 20 from the High Court. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9030/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, spare copies for service of respondent nos. 7,9,11,14,17,18,25,26 and 30 have not been filed, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9032/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 5 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos.6­16, 18,19,21 to 23, 28,29,31,32,34 to 37, 41 to 46, 51 to 53, 56 to 64, 68,70,72 to 78, 80,81 and 83 to 116 despite due service. Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for taking fresh steps and furnishing fresh address of respondent nos.17,20,24,25,30,33,38 to 40,47 to 50, 54,55,65 to 67, 69, 71,79 and 82. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No.11358/2011 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 despite due service. Fresh steps alongwith fresh address of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 be taken/furnished within three weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. 1

C.A.NO.11109/2016 None appears for respondent nos.1 to 3 despite due service. Appellant has not filed statement of case and statutory period had expired. Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for filing affidavit of valuation. List again on 21.3.2017. Civil Appeal No. 9023 of 2011 It is submitted that Mr. M.P. Jha,  Counsel for the Appellants  has expired. A notice for alternative arrangement has already been issued to the appellants on 008.02.2015 but no one  has entered appearance so far. A reminder to the High Court was issued on 01 st  March, 2017 and Certificate of Service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 24 has not been received so far. Service is not complete. Civil Appeal No. 9024 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 53 respondents in the matter. Respondent No. 41 is represented by counsel. A reminder was issued to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on  01 st  March, 2017  and  Certificate of Service has not been received so far. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2011 It is submitted that a reminder was issued to  High Court, Bombay  on   01 st  March, 2017  requesting therein to send  certificate of service  in  respect of  respondent nos. 1 to 20 and   Certificate of Service has not been received so far. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 20. Civil Appeal 9030 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 30 respondents in the matter. Mr.  B. K. Prasad and Mr. Pankaj Gupta,  Advocates have filed  vakalatnama/appearance  on behalf of respondent no. 1 to 3 and 4 respectively but they have not filed  Counter Affidavit despite last opportunity granted . Service of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete  in respect of Respondent nos. 5,6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19 to 24, 27 to 29 through certificate of Service , but no one has entered appearance so far.   It is further submitted that Counsel for the Appellant has on 15 th  February, 2017 filed 5 more spare copies of petition after expiry of Ld. Registrar order dated 14.02.2017 and the matter is to be listed before Hon'ble Judge in chamber. 2

Civil Appeal No. 9032 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 116 respondents in the matter.  Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are represented by counsel and  Counter Affidavit  has also been filed. It is further submitted that  notice has been served upon respondent nos. 6­16, 18­19, 21­23, 28­29, 31­32, 34­37, 41­46, 51­53, 56­64, 68, 70, 72­78, 80­81, 83­116 but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the appellant has not taken fresh steps in  respect of  respondent nos. 17, 20, 24, 25, 30, 33, 38 to 40, 47 to 50, 54, 55, 65 to 67, 69, 71, 79 and 82 so far. Hence Notice could not be issued. Civil Appeal No. 11358 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 21 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents except respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 & 19. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has not filed  Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4  and last opportunity is declined. Certificate of service has been received from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 but no one has filed  Vakalatnama/Appearance on their behalf. It is further submitted that the counsel for the appellant has not filed fresh and complete address in respect of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 alongwith copies of Petition of Appeal. Hence Notice could not be issued. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11109 OF 2016 It is submitted that Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal was issued on 9 th  December, 2016 to all the three respondents in the matter. Certificate of Service has been received in respect of all the respondents from the concerned High Court but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the Appellant has not filed Statement of Case so far. Time for filing the same has been expired. Counsel for the Appellant has also not filed Affidavit of Valuation so far. Service is Complete. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 10 th  day of March, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate,  Central Agency Section, Supreme Court of India. 2. Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate 3. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48,  Lawyer's Chambers, Supreme Court of India . 4. M/s Khaitan & Co., Advocate           dm       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3

\230ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALCivil Appeal No(s). 9023/2011PJL CLOTHING(INDIA) LTD. & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With Office Report)WITHC.A. No. 9024/2011C.A. No. 9026/2011C.A. No. 9030/2011C.A. No. 11358/2011C.A. No. 11109/2016C.A. No. 9032/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)Date : 21/03/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Jeevan B. Panda, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Khairati, Adv. Ms. Neha Agawal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad Mr. Pankaj Gupta,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Null,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A. No. 9023 of 2011Await certificate of service of respondents from the HighCourt and reminder be issued to this effect.Fresh alternative arrangement notice be issued to theappellant.C.A. No. 9024 of 2011Await certificate of service of respondent Nos. 1 to 40, 42 to53 from the High Court and reminder be issued to this effect.Opportunity to respondent No. 41 to file counter affidavit hasalready been declined.C.A. No. 9026 of 2011Await certificate of service of respondent Nos. 1 to 20 fromthe High Court and reminder be issued to this effect.C.A. No. 9030 of 2011Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavitdespite last opportunity having been granted as the furtheropportunity is declined.None appears for respondent Nos. 5,6,8,10,12,13,15,16,19 to24, 27 to 29 despite due service.Registry to process the matter in terms of order dated 14 thFebruary, 2017 for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers forfurther directions.C.A. No. 9032 of 2011Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 have already filed counter affidavit.None appears for respondent Nos. 6-16, 18-19, 21-23, 28-29,31-32, 34-37, 41-46, 51-53, 56-64, 68, 70, 72-78, 80-81, 83-116despite due service.Last opportunity having been granted, fresh steps for serviceof respondent Nos. 17, 20, 24, 25, 30, 33, 38 to 40, 47 to 50, 54,55, 65 to 67, 69, 71, 79 and 82 have not been taken, as such,

Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further directions.C.A. No. 11358 of 2011Opportunity to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to file counteraffidavit has already been declined.None appears for respondent Nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20and 21 despite due service.Last opportunity for taking fresh steps and furnish thecomplete address of respondent Nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 within twoweeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued.C.A. No. 11109 of 2016 Counsel for the appellant has not filed affidavit of valuationdespite last opportunity having been granted, as such, Registry toprocess the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambersfor further directions. List on 19 th April, 2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 5010/2017 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 08/09/2016 IN AN NO. 433/2012 PASSED BY THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APELLATE TRIBUNAL, WEST ZONAL BENCH AT MUMBAI) M/S INDIABULLS PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS HEAD- INDIRECT TAXATION, MR. G. RAJENDRAN PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-I. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 17/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gulati, Adv. Mr. Manish Rastogi, Adv. Mr. Shashi Mathews, Adv. Mr. Pranav Bansal, Adv. Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Adv. Mr. Neil Hildreth, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Leave granted. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellant for recovery of arrears of service Page No. 1 of 2

tax due on or before 30 th September, 2011. We clarify that there is no stay of imposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar as the future liability towards service tax with effect from 1 st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011. [VINOD LAKHINA] COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER Page No. 2 of 2

Listing Date : 17.02.2017 Court : 4 Item : 39 SECTION­IIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL  APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR     SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) 5010 OF 2017 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF   M/s Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner(s)                  Versus The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai .....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned has been filed by Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner against the final Order  and Judgment No. A/90756/16/STB dated 08 th  September 2016 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, west Zonal Bench at Mumbai in Appeal No. ST/433/12­MUM. It is submitted that Civil Appeal No. 8878 of 2011 @ SLP (C) No. 27636 of 2011 referred to on listing proforma arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on  14 th  October, 2011 when the Court has granted leave and the matter is pending. Copy of Record of Proceedings dated  14 th  October, 2011 is enclosed herewith. It is further submitted that Civil Appeal No. 1361 of 2011 @ SLP (C) No. 13850 of 2009 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24 th  January, 2011 when the Court has granted leave and the matter is pending. Copy of order dated 24 th  January 2011 is annexed as Annexure P­2 at Page No. 79 to 83 in the SLP paper books. It is lastly submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has on 07 th  February 2017 filed a letter with regard to maintainability of the SLP and Cause title and copy of the letter is annexed at Page No. 331 of SLP paper books. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Hon'ble Court  with this Office Report.     Dated this the 16 th  day of February, 2017.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ 1. Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Advocate Chamber No. 1, R.K.Garg Block, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR dm

zITEM NO.39 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 5010/2017(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 08/09/2016IN AN NO. 433/2012 PASSED BY THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAXAPELLATE TRIBUNAL, WEST ZONAL BENCH AT MUMBAI)M/S INDIABULLS PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS HEAD- INDIRECT TAXATION, MR. G. RAJENDRAN PETITIONER(S) VERSUSTHE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-I. RESPONDENT(S)(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)Date : 17/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gulati, Adv.Mr. Manish Rastogi, Adv.Mr. Shashi Mathews, Adv.Mr. Pranav Bansal, Adv. Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Adv.Mr. Neil Hildreth, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingO R D E RHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner andperused the relevant material.Leave granted.In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be takenagainst the appellant for recovery of arrears of servicePage No. 1 of 2tax due on or before 30 th September, 2011. We clarify thatthere is no stay of imposition of service tax undersub-clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 read withSection 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofaras the future liability towards service tax with effectfrom 1 st October, 2011 is concerned.Tag with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011. [VINOD LAKHINA]COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI]COURT MASTERPage No. 2 of 2

ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 9021/2011 CROWN INN PVT.LTD. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 9023/2011 C.A. No. 9024/2011 C.A. No. 9025/2011 C.A. No. 9026/2011 C.A. No. 9030/2011 C.A. No. 9032/2011 C.A. No. 11358/2011 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 11109/2016 Office Report) Date : 14/02/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mrs Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Ms Chandni Anand, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Ranjeet Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv.

-2- Item No.3 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.9021/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, fresh addresses of respondent nos. 6,14 and 19 have not been furnished, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9023/2011 Await appearance of the appellant. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9024/2011 Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Reminder be issued. Opportunity to respondent no.41 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. C.A. No.9025/2011 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 5 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Despite last opportunity having been granted, fresh address of respondent no. 6 has not been furnished, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9026/2011 Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 20 from the High Court. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9030/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, spare copies for service of respondent nos. 7,9,11,14,17,18,25,26

-3- Item No.3 and 30 have not been filed, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9032/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 5 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos.6-16, 18,19,21 to 23, 28,29,31,32,34 to 37, 41 to 46, 51 to 53, 56 to 64, 68,70,72 to 78, 80,81 and 83 to 116 despite due service. Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for taking fresh steps and furnishing fresh address of respondent nos.17,20,24,25,30,33,38 to 40,47 to 50, 54,55,65 to 67, 69, 71,79 and 82. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No.11358/2011 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 despite due service. Fresh steps alongwith fresh address of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 be taken/furnished within three weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No.2621/2012 Respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 92 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos.4 to 12, 17 to 24, 28 to 43, 45,46,48 to 67, 69 to 71, 76 to 87, 91,93 to 97, 99

-4- Item No.3 to 101, 103 to 107, 109 to 114, 118 to 133, 135,136, 140,143,144,146,148 to 151, 155 to 160 and 162 despite due service. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take steps in terms of Government O.M. No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011 in respect of respondent nos. 108 and 115 to 117 within three weeks time as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued. Despite last opportunity having been granted, fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 13 to 16, 25 to 27, 44,47,68,72 to 75,88 to 90, 98, 102, 134, 137 to 139, 141,142,145,147,152 to 154, 161 and 163 have not been taken, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A.NO.11109/2016 None appears for respondent nos.1 to 3 despite due service. Appellant has not filed statement of case and statutory period had expired. Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for filing affidavit of valuation. List again on 21.3.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Listing date: 14.02.2017 Court : R-1 Item No. 3 SECTION-IIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9021, 9023, 9024, 9025, 9026, 9030, 9032 & 11358 OF 2011, 2621 OF 2012 AND 11109 OF 2016 CROWN INN PVT.LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned (except Civil Appeal No. 11109 of 2016) were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 3 rd January, 2017, when the following order was passed: “ C.A. No. 9021/2011 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh address within two weeks time to effect service on respondent nos. 6,14 and 19 as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 9023/2011 Await appearance of the appellant. Reminder be issued. C.A. No. 9024/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent no.41 has not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1-40 and 42 to 53. Reminder be issued. C.A. No. 9025/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 to 5 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh address within two weeks time to effect service on respondent no.6, as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. 1

C.A. No. 9026/2011 Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 20. Reminder be issued. C.A. No. 9030/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Last opportunity of two weeks is granted to the ld. Counsel for the petitioner for filing spare copies alongwith address of respondent nos. 7,9,17 and 25. Notice thereafter be issued to respondent nos. 7,9,11,14,17,18,25,26 and 30. C.A. No. 9032/2011 None appears for respondent nos. 6-16, 18, 19, 21-23, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34-37, 41-46, 51-53, 56-64, 68, 70, 72-78, 80, 81, 83-116. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh address of respondent nos. 20, 24, 25, 30, 33, 38-40, 47-50, 55, 65-67, 69, 71, 79 within two weeks time and notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 11358/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh address alongwith spare copies in respect of respondent nos.7 to 9, 14 and 19 within two weeks time and notices thereafter be issued. None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. C.A. No. 2621/2012 Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos.13-16,25-27,44,47, 68, 72-75, 88-90, 98, 102, 134, 137-139, 141, 142, 145, 147, 152-154, 161,163 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 108, 115 to 117 within three weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued in terms of Government O.M. No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011. None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. ” 2

Civil Appeal No. 9021 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 19 respondents in the matter. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5. Service is complete on respondent nos. 7 to 13, 15 to 18 through certificate of service, but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of respondent nos. 6, 14 and 19 so far. Hence notice could not be issued. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 6, 14, and 19. Civil Appeal No. 9023 of 2011 It is submitted that Mr. M.P. Jha, Counsel for the Appellants has expired. A notice for alternative arrangement has already been issued to the appellants on 02.06.2016 but no one has entered appearance so far. A reminder to the High Court was issued to 11 th February, 2017 and Certificate of Service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 24 is awaited. Service is not complete. Civil Appeal No. 9024 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 53 respondents in the matter. Mr. Krishnan Kumar Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent no. 41 but he has not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity granted. A reminder to was issued to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on 11 th February, 2017 and Service is awaited in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Civil Appeal No. 9025 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 8 respondents in the matter. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5 but he has not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity granted. Service is complete on respondent nos. 7 and 8 through certificate of service, but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of respondent nos. 6 so far. Hence notice could not be issued to respondent no.6. 3

Service is not complete on respondent no. 6. Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2011 It is submitted that a reminder was issued to High Court, Bombay on 11 th February, 2017 requesting therein to send certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 20 and service is awaited. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 20. Civil Appeal 9030 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 30 respondents in the matter. Mr. B. K. Prasad and Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent no. 1 to 3 and 4 respectively but they have not filed Counter Affidavit despite last opportunity granted . Service of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete in respect of Respondent nos. 5,6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19 to 24, 27 to 29 through certificate of Service , but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Appellant has on 10 th February, 2017 filed fresh address in respect of respondent nos. 7, 9, 17 and 25 and also filed four spare copies which are less by 5 nos. of spare copies. Hence notice could not be issued in respect of respondent nos. 7, 9, 11, 14, 17, 18, 25, 26 and 30. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 7, 9, 11, 14, 17, 18, 25, 26 & 30. Civil Appeal No. 9032 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 116 respondents in the matter. Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are represented by counsel and Counter Affidavit has also been filed. It is further submitted that notice has been served upon respondent nos. 6-16, 18-19, 21-23, 28-29, 31-32, 34-37, 41-46, 51-53, 56-64, 68, 70, 72-78, 80-81, 83-116 but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the appellant has not taken fresh steps in respect of respondent nos. 17, 20, 24, 25, 30, 33, 38 to 40, 47 to 50, 54, 55, 65 to 67, 69, 71, 79 and 82 so far. Hence Notice could not be issued. 4

Civil Appeal No. 11358 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 21 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents except respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 & 19. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 and last opportunity is declined. Certificate of service has been received from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on their behalf. It is further submitted that the counsel for the appellant has not filed fresh and complete address in respect of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 alongwith copies of Petition of Appeal. Hence Notice could not be issued. Civil Appeal 2621 of 2012 It is submitted that respondent nos. 1-3 and 92 are represented through their counsel and Counter Affidavit has also been filed in respect of respondent nos. 1-3. It is further submitted that service is complete in respect of respondent nos. 4-12, 17-24, 28-43, 45-46, 48-67, 69-71, 76-87, 91, 93-97, 99-101, 103-107, 109-114, 118-133, 135-136, 140, 143,-144, 146, 148-151, 155 to 160 and 162 but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent no. 13-16, 25 to 27, 44, 47, 68, 72-75, 88-90, 98, 102, 115-117, 134, 137-139, 141-142, 145, 147, 152-154, 161, 163, and also not taken steps in accordance with the government O.M. No. 12 (77)/10 Judl. Dated 18-8-2011 to effect service on respondent nos. 108 and 115 to 117 who are residing abroad so far and appeal has been disposed of against them vide Order dated 22.08.2016. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11109 OF 2016 The matter above­mentioned was listed before the  Hon'ble Court  on  15 th November, 2016  when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “ Delay condoned. Leave granted. To be heard along with Civil Appeal No. 5690 of 2012.” It is submitted that Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal was issued on 9 th December, 2016 to all the three respondents in the matter. 5

Certificate of Service has been received in respect of all the respondents from the concerned High Court but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the Appellant has not filed Statement of Case so far. Time for filing the same has been expired. Counsel for the Appellant has also not filed Affidavit of Valuation so far. Service is Complete. The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 13 th day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate 161/52, 3rd Floor, Flat No.8, Jogabai, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi-110 025 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate, 304, 3rd Floor, Somdutt Chamber, 9, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, D-28 (L.G.F.), Jangpura Extn. , New Delhi-110 014 5. Mr. Nilofar Qureshi, Advocate G-20, Vardhman City II Plaza, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi-110 002 6. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate, Library 2, Supreme Court, 7. Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate 55, Old Lawyers Chambers ASSISTANT REGISTRAR pc-2 6

\224)ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 9021/2011CROWN INN PVT.LTD. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITHC.A. No. 9023/2011C.A. No. 9024/2011C.A. No. 9025/2011C.A. No. 9026/2011C.A. No. 9030/2011C.A. No. 9032/2011C.A. No. 11358/2011Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 11109/2016Office Report) Date : 14/02/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mrs Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Ms Chandni Anand, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ranjeet Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv.-2-Item No.3 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A. No.9021/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, freshaddresses of respondent nos. 6,14 and 19 have not beenfurnished, as such, let the matter be placed before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.C.A. No.9023/2011Await appearance of the appellant. Reminder be issued.C.A. No.9024/2011Await certificate of service in respect of respondentnos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Reminder be issued.Opportunity to respondent no.41 to file counteraffidavit has already been declined.C.A. No.9025/2011Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 5 to file counteraffidavit has already been declined.Despite last opportunity having been granted, freshaddress of respondent no. 6 has not been furnished, as such,let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further directions.C.A. No.9026/2011Await certificate of service in respect of respondentnos. 1 to 20 from the High Court. Reminder be issued.C.A. No.9030/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, sparecopies for service of respondent nos. 7,9,11,14,17,18,25,26

-3-Item No.3and 30 have not been filed, as such, let the matter beplaced before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for furtherdirections.C.A. No.9032/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 5 have already filed counteraffidavit.None appears for respondent nos.6-16, 18,19,21 to 23,28,29,31,32,34 to 37, 41 to 46, 51 to 53, 56 to 64, 68,70,72to 78, 80,81 and 83 to 116 despite due service.Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for takingfresh steps and furnishing fresh address of respondentnos.17,20,24,25,30,33,38 to 40,47 to 50, 54,55,65 to 67, 69,71,79 and 82. Notices thereafter be issued.C.A. No.11358/2011Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 4 to file counteraffidavit has already been declined.None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13, 15 to18, 20 and 21 despite due service.Fresh steps alongwith fresh address of respondent nos.7 to 9, 14 and 19 be taken/furnished within three weekstime. Notices thereafter be issued.C.A. No.2621/2012Respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 92 have already filedcounter affidavit.None appears for respondent nos.4 to 12, 17 to 24, 28to 43, 45,46,48 to 67, 69 to 71, 76 to 87, 91,93 to 97, 99-4-Item No.3to 101, 103 to 107, 109 to 114, 118 to 133, 135,136,140,143,144,146,148 to 151, 155 to 160 and 162 despite dueservice.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take steps in terms ofGovernment O.M. No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011 in respectof respondent nos. 108 and 115 to 117 within three weekstime as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued.Despite last opportunity having been granted, freshsteps for service of respondent nos. 13 to 16, 25 to 27,44,47,68,72 to 75,88 to 90, 98, 102, 134, 137 to 139,141,142,145,147,152 to 154, 161 and 163 have not been taken,as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further directions.C.A.NO.11109/2016None appears for respondent nos.1 to 3 despite dueservice.Appellant has not filed statement of case and statutoryperiod had expired. Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for filingaffidavit of valuation.List again on 21.3.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 1752/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/06/2016 in WP No. 2971/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ANUJ GOYAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) Date : 30/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. T.N. Razdan, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. To be heard along with C.A.No.5690/2012. (SWETA DHYANI) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

SECTION – III B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) CC No. 1752 OF 2017. WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for condonation of delay in refiling SLP) Union of India & Anr. …..Petitioners Versus Anuj Goyal & Ors. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned has been filed by Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, on behalf of the Petitioner against the final impugned Judgment and order dated 03 rd June, 2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in W.P. (C) No. 2971 of 2011. There is delay of 46 and 59 days in filing and refiling the SLP respectively. It is submitted that the Civil Appeal No. 11109 of 2016 @ SLP (C) CC No. 21032 of 2016 arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble court on 15 th November, 2016 when the court has granted leave and the matter is pending. Copy of the Record of Proceeding dated 15 th November 2016 is enclosed herewith. The matter alongwith application is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 27 th Day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section, Supreme Court of India. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR VM

öITEM NO.26 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s).1752/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/06/2016in WP No. 2971/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSANUJ GOYAL & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refilingSLP and office report)Date : 30/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. T.N. Razdan, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned.Leave granted. To be heard along with C.A.No.5690/2012. (SWETA DHYANI) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1351-1358/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS JANAK PLACE MARKET ASSN.& ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 9021/2011 C.A. No. 9023/2011 C.A. No. 9024/2011 C.A. No. 9025/2011 C.A. No. 9026/2011 C.A. No. 9030/2011 C.A. No. 9031/2011 C.A. No. 9032/2011 C.A. No. 11358/2011 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1456/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1461/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 03/01/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

-2- Item No.4 For Appellant(s) Mr Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms Chandni, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr Victor Das, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr Surender Singh, Adv. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Mr Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan,Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr Rajiv K Garg, Adv. Dr Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A.NO.1351-1358/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, fresh address of respondent no. 2 in C.A.No.1352/2011 has not been furnished. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Jud ge in Chambers for further directions.

-3- Item No.4 C.A. No.9021/2011 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh address within two weeks time to effect service on respondent nos. 6,14 and 19 as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No.9023/2011 Await appearance of the appellant. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9024/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent no.41 has not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1-40 and 42 to 53. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9025/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 to 5 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh address within two weeks time to effect service on respondent no.6, as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A. No.9026/2011 Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 20. Reminder be issued.

-4- Item No.4 C.A. No.9030/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Last opportunity of two weeks is granted to the ld. Counsel for the petitioner for filing spare copies alongwith address of respondent nos. 7,9,17 and 25. Notice thereafter be issued to respondent nos. 7,9,11,14,17,18,25,26 and 30. C.A. No.9031/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. IA for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.18 has not been filed despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9032/2011 None appears for respondent nos.6-16,18,19,21-23,28,29, 31, 32,34-37,41-46,51-53,56-64,68,70,72-78,80,81,83-116 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh address of respondent nos.20,24, 25,30,33,38-40,47-50,55,65-67,69,71,79 within two weeks time and notices thereafter be issued.

-5- Item No.4 C.A.NO.11358/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh address alongwith spare copies in respect of respondent nos.7 to 9, 14 and 19 within two weeks time and notices thereafter be issued. None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. C.A.NO.1456/2012 Respondent nos. 1 to 4, 52 and 56 are duly represented. Appeal has already been dismissed against respondent nos. 9,7,18,41,42,51,57 and 60 vide order dt.22.8.2016. None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. C.A.NO.1461/2012 Appeal has already been dismissed against respondent nos. 8,11,37 and 38 vide order dt.22.8.2016. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented and counter affidavit has been filed by respondent nos. 1 to 3. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.

-6- Item No.4 C.A.NO.2621/2012 Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos.13-16,25-27,44,47, 68,72-75,88-90,98,102,134,137-139,141,142,145,147,152-154, 161,163 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 108, 115 to 117 within three weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued in terms of Government O.M. No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011 . None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. C.A.NO.2738/2012 Appeal has already been dismissed against respondent nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29 vide order dt.22.8.2016. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 17 have not filed counter affidavit. None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. C.A.NO.3665/2012 Appeal has already been dismissed against respondent no. 7 vide order dt.22.8.2016.

-7- Item No.4 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. C.A.NO.5006/2014 Appeal has already been dismissed against respondent nos. 6 to 8, 20,23,25,27,44,115,120,138,140 and 141 vide order dt.22.8.2016. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counter affidavit. None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 and 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. List again on 14.2.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

TDITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1351-1358/2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSJANAK PLACE MARKET ASSN.& ORS. Respondent(s)WITHC.A. No. 9021/2011C.A. No. 9023/2011C.A. No. 9024/2011C.A. No. 9025/2011C.A. No. 9026/2011C.A. No. 9030/2011C.A. No. 9031/2011C.A. No. 9032/2011C.A. No. 11358/2011Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1456/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1461/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 03/01/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.-2-Item No.4For Appellant(s) Mr Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms Chandni, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr Victor Das, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr Surender Singh, Adv. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Mr Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan,Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr Rajiv K Garg, Adv. Dr Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv.

Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A.NO.1351-1358/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, freshaddress of respondent no. 2 in C.A.No.1352/2011 has not beenfurnished.Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Jud ge inChambers for further directions.-3-Item No.4 C.A. No.9021/2011Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh addresswithin two weeks time to effect service on respondent nos.6,14 and 19 as last opportunity. Notices thereafter beissued. C.A. No.9023/2011Await appearance of the appellant. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9024/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondentno.41 has not filed counter affidavit, as such, furtheropportunity is declined.Await certificate of service in respect of respondentnos. 1-40 and 42 to 53. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.9025/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondentnos. 1 to 5 have not filed counter affidavit, as such,further opportunity is declined.Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh addresswithin two weeks time to effect service on respondent no.6,as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A. No.9026/2011Await certificate of service from the High Court inrespect of respondent nos. 1 to 20. Reminder be issued.-4-Item No.4 C.A. No.9030/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondentnos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such,further opportunity is declined. Last opportunity of two weeks is granted to the ld.Counsel for the petitioner for filing spare copies alongwithaddress of respondent nos. 7,9,17 and 25. Notice thereafterbe issued to respondent nos. 7,9,11,14,17,18,25,26 and 30. C.A. No.9031/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondentnos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such,further opportunity is declined. IA for substitution of legal representatives of deceasedrespondent no.18 has not been filed despite last opportunityhaving been granted, as such, process the matter for listingbefore the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9032/2011None appears for respondent nos.6-16,18,19,21-23,28,29,31, 32,34-37,41-46,51-53,56-64,68,70,72-78,80,81,83-116Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh stepsalongwith fresh address of respondent nos.20,24,25,30,33,38-40,47-50,55,65-67,69,71,79 within two weeks timeand notices thereafter be issued.-5-Item No.4C.A.NO.11358/2011Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondentnos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such,further opportunity is declined.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh addressalongwith spare copies in respect of respondent nos.7 to 9,14 and 19 within two weeks time and notices thereafter beissued.None appears for the remaining respondents despite dueservice.C.A.NO.1456/2012Respondent nos. 1 to 4, 52 and 56 are duly represented.Appeal has already been dismissed against respondentnos. 9,7,18,41,42,51,57 and 60 vide order dt.22.8.2016.None appears for the remaining respondents despite dueservice.Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before theHon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.C.A.NO.1461/2012Appeal has already been dismissed against respondentnos. 8,11,37 and 38 vide order dt.22.8.2016.Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented and counteraffidavit has been filed by respondent nos. 1 to 3.Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before theHon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.-6-Item No.4C.A.NO.2621/2012Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counteraffidavit.Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps toeffect service on respondent nos.13-16,25-27,44,47,68,72-75,88-90,98,102,134,137-139,141,142,145,147,152-154,161,163 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Noticethereafter be issued.Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps toeffect service on respondent nos. 108, 115 to 117 withinthree weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued in terms ofGovernment O.M. No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011 .None appears for the remaining respondents despite dueservice.C.A.NO.2738/2012Appeal has already been dismissed against respondentnos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29 vide order dt.22.8.2016.Respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 17 have not filed counteraffidavit.None appears for the remaining respondents despite dueservice.Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before theHon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.C.A.NO.3665/2012Appeal has already been dismissed against respondent no.7 vide order dt.22.8.2016.-7-Item No.4Respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavitdespite last opportunity having been granted, as such,further opportunity is declined.None appears for the remaining respondents despite dueservice.Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before theHon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.C.A.NO.5006/2014Appeal has already been dismissed against respondentnos. 6 to 8, 20,23,25,27,44,115,120,138,140 and 141 videorder dt.22.8.2016.Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counteraffidavit.None appears for the remaining respondents despite dueservice.Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the

Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters. SLP(C) No. 12004/2014Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 and 3 to file counteraffidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service.Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before theHon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.List again on 14.2.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R None appears for the appellant. If affidavit of dasti service is not filed within four weeks from today the civil appeal be treated as dismissed for non-prosecution against respondent nos. 5 and 8. Registry to proceed with the matter thereafter. ..........................J. [A.M. KHANWILKAR] NEW DELHI; DECEMBER 16, 2016

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office Report on Default) Date : 16/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the appellant. If affidavit of dasti service is not filed within four weeks from today the civil appeal be treated as dismissed for non-prosecution against respondent nos. 5 and 8. Registry to proceed with the matter thereafter. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on file)

ITEM NO.18 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 9023/2011 PJL CLOTHING(INDIA) LTD. & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office Report for Directions) Date : 16/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,AOR Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the petitioners. L earned counsel for the petitioners to serve fresh notice to the unserved respondent(s) returnable within six weeks. Dasti in addition is also permitted. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

zIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11441/2011GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R None appears for the appellant.If affidavit of dasti service is not filed within fourweeks from today the civil appeal be treated as dismissedfor non-prosecution against respondent nos. 5 and 8.Registry to proceed with the matter thereafter. ..........................J. [A.M. KHANWILKAR]NEW DELHI;DECEMBER 16, 2016ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal No. 11441/2011GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date : 16/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for the appellant.If affidavit of dasti service is not filed within fourweeks from today the civil appeal be treated as dismissedfor non-prosecution against respondent nos. 5 and 8.Registry to proceed with the matter thereafter. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on file)

ÆITEM NO.18 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal No. 9023/2011PJL CLOTHING(INDIA) LTD. & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report for Directions)Date : 16/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv.Mr. E. C. Agrawala,AORMr. Vikrant Pachnanda, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for the petitioners.L earned counsel for the petitioners to serve fresh notice tothe unserved respondent(s) returnable within six weeks.Dasti in addition is also permitted. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No. 21032/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/06/2016 in WPC No. 2235/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURESH KUMAR BANSAL AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 15/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. To be heard along with Civil Appeal No. 5690 of 2012. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

SECTION – III B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) CC No. 21032 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Applications for Condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) Union of India & Anr. …..Petitioners Versus Suresh Kumar Bansal & Ors. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned has been filed by Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, on behalf of the Petitioners against the final judgment and Order dated 3 rd June, 2016 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2235 of 2011. There is delay of 35 days in filing the SLP. It is submitted that Civil Appeal No. 5690 of 2012 @ SLP (Civil) No. 21104 of 2012 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30 th July, 2012 when the court was pleased to grant leave and the matter is pending for hearing. Copy of Record of Proceeding dated 30 th July, 2012 is enclosed herewith. (Main matter Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011). The matter is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 11 th Day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

ÎITEM NO.43 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No. 21032/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/06/2016in WPC No. 2235/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at NewDelhi)UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSURESH KUMAR BANSAL AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 15/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s)Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Adv.Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv.Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Adv.Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Leave granted.To be heard along with Civil Appeal No. 5690 of 2012. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1351-1358/2011 C.A. No. 1359/2011 C.A. No. 9021/2011 C.A. No. 9023/2011 C.A. No. 9024/2011 C.A. No. 9025/2011 C.A. No. 9026/2011 C.A. No. 9030/2011 C.A. No. 9031/2011 C.A. No. 9032/2011 C.A. No. 11358/2011 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1456/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1461/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 Interim Relief and Office Report)

-2- Item No.1 Date : 28/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms Shreya Agrawal, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Ms Usha Nandini V, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr Suman Jyoti Khaitan, Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv.

-3- Item No.1 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A.NO.1323-44/2011 None appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in C.A.NO.1335/2011, respondent nos. 1 to 3 in C.A.NO.1339/2011 despite due service. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A.NO.1329/2011 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. Await certificate of service in respect of the sole respondent in C.A.NO.1326, 1334 OF 2011 from the High Court. Address of the sole respondent in C.A.NO.1338/2011 has not been furnished despite last opportunity having been granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A.NO.1359/2011 Affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent no.10 has not been filed despite last opportunity having been granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate office report showing the status of all the respondents. C.A.NO.9030/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented.

-4- Item No.1 Registry to give status of respondent nos. 5 to 13 in the next office report as it has been mentioned that there are 13 respondents. C.A.NO.9021/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 7 to 13, 15 to 18 despite due service. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish address of respondent nos. 6,14 and 19 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.9024/2011 Respondent no.41 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 1-40, 42,53. C.A.NO.9025/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos. 7 and 8 despite due service. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of respondent no.6 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.9026/2011 Await certificate of service in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 20 from the High Court. Reminder be issued.

-5- Item No.1 C.A.NO.9032/2011 Await certificate of service in respect of the respondents from the High Court. Reminder be issued. C.A.NO.9030/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,8,10,12,13,15,16,19 to 24, 27 to 29 despite due service. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of respondent nos. 7,9,17 and 25 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. Fresh notices be issued to respondent nos. 11,14,18,26 and 30 also. C.A.NO.9031/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. None appears for respondent nos. 5 to 17, 19 to 28 despite due service. Last opportunity of three weeks time is granted for filing application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.18, if otherwise permissible. Registry thereafter to process under rules. C.A.NO.11358/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

-6- Item No.1 None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13,15 to 18,20 and 21 despite due service,. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish complete address of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos. 1 and 3 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. C.A.NO.1456/2012 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to file spare copies to effect service on respondent no.67 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 54 and 55 from the High Court. Reminder be issued. SLP against respondent nos. 9,17,18,41,42,51 and 60 has already been dismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016. C.A.NO.1461/2012 SLP against respondent nos. 8,11,37,38 has been dismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016. C.A.NO.2621/2012 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of respondent nos.13-16,25-27,72-75, 88,89,98,117, 134,137,138,139,141,142,145,147,154,161,163,47,68,44,102,

-7- Item No.1 152,153 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. Respondent Nos. 115 to 117, 108, are residing abroad. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take steps for effecting service in accordance with Government O.M.No.F.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011. C.A.NO.2738/2012 Appeal against respondent nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29 has been dismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent no.33 from the High Court. Reminder be issued. C.A.NO.3665/2012 Appeal against respondent no.7 has been dismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. C.A.NO.5006/2014 Appeal against respondent nos.6,7,8,20,23,25, 27,44,115,120,138,140 and 141 has been dismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016. C.A. No. 1351/2011 None appears for respondent no.1 despite due service. Respondent no.2 is duly represented. C.A. No. 1352/2011 None appears for respondent no.1 despite due service. Respondent no.3 is duly represented.

-8- Item No.1 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of respondent no.2 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 1353/2011 None appears for respondent nos.1-3 despite due service. C.A. No. 1354/2011 None appears for respondent no.1 despite due service. C.A. No. 1355/2011 None appears for the respondents despite due service. C.A. No. 1356/2011 None appears for respondent nos.1-3 despite due service. Respondent no.4 is duly represented. C.A. No. 1357/2011 Respondent No.1 is duly represented. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. C.A. No. 1358/2011 Respondent No.1 is duly represented. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. Registry to submit the status of the remaining respondents in all the matters in the next office report. C.A.NO.9023/2011 Office report not received. List again on 3.1.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Listed on: 28.10.2016 Registrar Court No. 1   Item No. 1 SECTION ­ III­B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1323­1344, 1351­1358, 1359, 9021, 9023, 9024, 9025, 9026,   9030, 9031, 9032 AND 11358 OF 2011, CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1456, 1461, 2621,   2738 AND 3665 OF 2012, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5006 OF 2014 AND SPECIAL LEAVE   PETITION © NO. 12004 OF 2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC.           ...Appellants ­Versus­ M/S. LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P. LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC.           ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1323­1344, 1351­1358, 1359, 9023, 9031 AND 11358 OF 2011,   CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738 AND 3665 OF 2012, CIVIL APPEAL NO.   5006 OF 2014 AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © NO. 12004 OF 2014 The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 31 st   August, 2016 when the following order was passed: “ C.A. No. 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738, 3665 of 2012, C.A. No. 5006/2014 Deleted. C.A. No. 1323-1344/2011 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. No.1338/2011 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. No. 1329/2011 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. None appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No.1335/2011 and respondent nos. 1 to 3 in C.A. NO.1339/2011 despite due service. Await service of the sole respondent in C.A. No. 1326, 1334 of 2011 from the High Court. Reminder be issued. ..2/­

­2­ C.A. No.1359/2011 None appears for respondent nos. 1 to 9 and 11 to 14 despite due service. Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for filing affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent no.10. C.A. No.9023/2011 Alternative arrangement notice to both appellants have been received back with the report 'left and 'not known'. Certificate of service also not received from the High Court despite several efforts in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 23. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9031/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 5 to 17 and 19 to 28 despite due service. Application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.18 has not been filed since 17.5.2013. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A.NO.11358/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13, 15 to 18,20 and 21 despite due service. Spare copies and fresh address for service of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 have not been filed/furnished since February, 2015. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. ..3/­

­3­ SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 Respondent nos. 1 and 3 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. C.A. No. 1351- 358/2011 Office report not received. List again on 28.10.2016. ” CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1323­1344 OF 2011 It is submitted that reminder to the High Court was issued on 20 th  July, 2016 for   sending the certificate of Service in respect of Common Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal   Nos. 1326 and 1334 of 2011, Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1329 of 2011,   Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Civil Appeal 1335 of 2011, Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in Civil   Appeal No. 1339 of 2011. The High Court of Delhi vide its letter dated 5 th  August, 2016 has sent Service   report of Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal which shows that the notice has   been served on Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Civil Appeal No. 1335 of 2011 and   Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in Civil Appeal No. 1339 of 2011 but no one has entered   appearance so far.  It is also submitted that Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1329 of 2011 is   unserved as Office of the said Company has been shifted from the given address and   now it is lying vacant as per certificate of service received from High Court. It is also   submitted that Certificate of Service in respect of Common sole Respondent in Civil   Appeal Nos. 1326 & 1334 of 2011 is not received from the High Court despite the this   Registry's letter dated 14.09.2016. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Appellant has not furnished fresh   address of Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1338 of 2011 viz. M/s Saffron Foods (P)   Ltd. so far. Hence fresh Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal could not be issued. C.A. NO. 1359 OF 2011 It is submitted that Advocate for the Appellant has not filed affidavit of Dasti   service with proof in respect of respondent no. 10 so far. ..4/­

­4­ C.A. NO. 9030 of 2011 There are 13 respondents in the matter. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition   of Appeal is complete on Respondent nos. 1 to 3  as Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed   vakalatnama and appearance on their behalf. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate has filed   vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of respondent no. 4. Respondent Nos. 5, 9, 12,   14 to 16, 18 and 19, 21 and 22, 24, 28 and 29 are served through certificate of service,   but no one has entered appearance so far.  Civil Appeal No. 9021 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 19 respondents in the matter. Mr. B.K. Prasad,   Advocate has filed v/a on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5. Service is complete on   respondent nos. 7 to 13, 15 to 18 through certificate of service, but no one has entered   appearance so far. Counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of   respondent nos. 6, 14, 19 despite this Registry's letter dated 19.05.2016. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 6, 14, and 19. Civil Appeal No. 9024 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 53 respondents in the matter. Mr. Krishnan Kumar   Advocate has filed v/a on behalf of respondent no. 41 but he has not filed counter   affidavit so far. Service is not complete on respondent nos.  1 to 40, 42 to 53 as certificate of   service has not been received from High Court of Bombay despite this Registry's letter   dated 03.06.2016. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 40, 42 to 53. Civil Appeal No. 9025 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 8 respondents in the matter. Mr. B.K. Prasad,   Advocate has filed v/a on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5 but he has not filed counter   affidavit so far. Service is complete on respondent nos. 7 and 8  through certificate of   service, but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the appellant has not   furnished fresh address of respondent nos. 6 despite this Registry's letter. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 6. Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 20 respondents in the matter.   ..5/­

­5­ Service is not complete on respondent nos.  1 to 20  as certificate of service has   not been received from High Court of Bombay despite this Registry's letter. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 20. Civil Appeal No. 9032 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 116 respondents in the matter.   Service is not complete on respondent nos.  1 to 116  as certificate of service has   not been received from High Court of Bombay despite this Registry's letter dated   08.05.2016. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1 to 116. Civil Appeal 9030 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 30 respondents in the matter. Mr.  B. K. Prasad and   Mr. Pankaj Gupta,  Advocates have filed v/a on behalf of respondent no. 1 to 3 and 4   respectively.Service of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete  in respect of   Respondent nos. 5,6, 8,   10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19 to 24 , 27 to 29 through certificate of   Service , but no one has entered appearance so far.   It is also submitted that Certificate of service of Notice of lodgment of Petition of   Appeal have been received from respondent no. 7, 9, 17, 25 which shows that notice   have been returned unserved with remarks “shifted from given address”, “premises   found locked, shifted to other place”, “door was found locked”, and “no such office at   given address” respectively. Counsel for the Appellant has not filed fresh address of   Respondent nos. 7, 9, 17, 25. Certificate of service has not been received from   respondent nos. 11, 14, 18, 26, 30. However, High Court vide its letter received on 27 th   September, 2016 requested to issue fresh Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal for   respondent nos. 11, 26 and 30. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 7, 9, 11, 14,   17,18, 25, 26 and 30. Civil Appeal No. 9031 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 28 Respondents in this matter Mr. B.K. Prasad,   Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.   Service is complete on respondent nos. 5 to 17, 19 to 28 through certificate of Service   received from the High Court, but no one has entered appearance so far. It is also   submitted that respondent no. 18 has since expired as per certificate of service received   through High Court, but counsel for the the Appellant has not filed application for  ..6/­

­6­ substitution to bring on record legal representatives list of deceased respondent no. 16   despite this Registry's letter dated 17 th  May, 2013, 17 th  November, 2014 and 23 rd  May,   2016 so far. Civil Appeal No. 11358 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 21 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of   Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents except respondent   nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on   behalf of respondent no. 1 to 4 and certificate of service has been received from the   High Court which shows that notice has been served on respondent nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13,   15 to 18, 20 and 21 but no one has filed  Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said   respondents. Certificate of Service has been received back from the High Court in   respect of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 with remarks that “incomplete address”. It is further submitted that the counsel for the appellant has filed fresh and   complete address in respect of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 alongwith two copies   of Petition of Appeal for effecting service on respondent nos. 8 and 9 so far despite   Registry's request dated 16.02.2015 and 24.05.2016. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © NO. 12004 OF 2014 It is submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 has not filed Counter   Affidavit so far. It is lastly submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of   Respondent No.2, through served with notice. Service of Notice is complete. Civil Appeal No. 1456 of 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not filed spare copy of the   Petition of Appeal on the unserved respondent no. 67. Certificate of Service has not been received from the High Court on   respondent no. 54 and 55. He has not furnished the better particulars on   respondent nos. 9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41, 42 so far. It is submitted that appeal dismissed against respondent no. 9, 17, 18, 51,   60, 41, 42 vide Court's Order dated 22.08.2016 as four weeks time elapsed. Civil Appeal No. 1461 of 2012.  It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address   ..7/­

­7­ of unserved respondent nos. 8, 37 and 38. He has filed an application for   substitution of the deceased respondent no. 11 so far. Appeal dismissed against   respondent nos. 8, 11, 37 and 38 vide Court's Order dated 22.08.2016. Civil Appeal 2621 of 2012  It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address   of unserved respondent no. 13, 14, 15, 16, 25 to 27, 72, 73, 74, 75, 88, 89,  98,   117, 134, 137, 138, 139, 141, 142, 145, 147, 154, 161, 163, 47, 68, 44, 102, 152­ 153. He has also not taken steps in accordance with the government O.M. Dated   August, 2011 to effect service on respondent nos. 115 to 117, 108 and 116 who are   residing abroad and appeal disposed against them vide Order dated 22.08.2016. Civil Appeal No. 2738 of 2012  It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address   of unserved respondent nos. 5 to 8, 13, 20, 24, 28 and 29 and appeal dismissed   vide Court's Order dated 22.08.2016.  It is further submitted that certificate of service has not been received from   the High Court in respect of respondent no. 33 despite reminder. Civil Appeal No. 3665 of 2012   It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not filed application for deletion   of name of respondent no. 7 from the array of parties so far and appeal dismissed   vide Order dated 22.08.2016. It is further submitted that counsel for respondent no. 1 to 4 has not filed   counter affidavit so far. Civil Appeal No. 5006 of 2014  It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not filed application for   bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 6, 7, 8, 20, 23, 25, 27,   44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 on record so far and appeal dismissed vide Order   dated 22.08.2016. Civil Appeal No. 1351­1358 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 19 respondents in these appeals.  Service of   notice of lodgment of petition of appeal is complete in all the respondents except   respondent No. 2 in C.A. No. 1352 of 2011. ..8/­

­8­ Service position of each respondent is as under:­ C.A. No. Total   Respondents V/A filed A.D. Card   received Certificate  of Service Unserved 1351 2 Resp. No. 2 by Ms. Bina   Tamta, Advocate  Resp. No. 1 1352 3 Resp. No. 3 by Mr.   Bankey Bihari, Advocate Resp. No. 1 Resp. No. 2 1353 3 Resp. No. 1 Resp. No.   2 & 3 1354 1 Resp. No. 1 1355 2 Resp. Nos.   1 & 2 1356 4 Resp. No. 4 by Ms.   Suman Jyoti Khaitan,   Advocate Resp. Nos.   1 to 3 1357 2 Resp. No. 1 by M/s O.P.   Khaitan & Co.,   Advocates Resp. No. 2 1358 2 Resp. No. 1 by M/s O.P.   Khaitan & Co.,   Advocates Resp. No. 1 It is further submitted that certificate of service has been received back from the   High Court in respect of respondent No. 2 in C.A. No. 1352 of 2011 with remarks “Now   Sunrise Hospital exists at the given address”.  Counsel for the appellant has not filed   fresh and complete address of respondent No. 2 in C.A. No. 1352 of 2011 so far despite   this Registry's request dated 29 th  November, 2014 and 29 th  February, 2016. It is lastly submitted that A.D. Card duly signed have been received back from   respondent No. 1 in C.A. Nos. 1351, 1352, 1353, 1354 and 1358 of 2011,  respondent   Nos. 1 to 3 in C.A. No. 1356 of 2011 and respondent No. 2 in C.A. No. 1357 of 2011   respectively but no one have filed Vakalatnama/Appearance so far. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with   this office report. Dated this the 27 th  day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

­9­ Copy to: 1. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate 161/52, 3rd Floor, Flat No.8, Jogabai, Jamia Nagar New Delhi­110 025 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate, 304, 3rd Floor, Somdutt Chamber, 9, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, D­28 (L.G.F.), Jangpura Extn. New Delhi­110 014 5. Mr. Nilofar Qureshi, Advocate                                 G­20, Vardhman City II Plaza, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­110 002 6. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate, Library 2, Supreme Court,  7.  Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate 55, Old Lawyers Chambers  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR dp

JITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSM/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s)WITHC.A. No. 1351-1358/2011C.A. No. 1359/2011C.A. No. 9021/2011C.A. No. 9023/2011C.A. No. 9024/2011C.A. No. 9025/2011C.A. No. 9026/2011C.A. No. 9030/2011C.A. No. 9031/2011C.A. No. 9032/2011C.A. No. 11358/2011Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1456/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1461/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014Interim Relief and Office Report)-2-Item No.1 Date : 28/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms Shreya Agrawal, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Ms Usha Nandini V, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr Suman Jyoti Khaitan, Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv.

Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv.-3-Item No.1 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A.NO.1323-44/2011None appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2 inC.A.NO.1335/2011, respondent nos. 1 to 3 inC.A.NO.1339/2011 despite due service.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish freshaddress of the sole respondent in C.A.NO.1329/2011 withintwo weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued.Await certificate of service in respect of the solerespondent in C.A.NO.1326, 1334 OF 2011 from the HighCourt.Address of the sole respondent in C.A.NO.1338/2011has not been furnished despite last opportunity havingbeen granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further directions.C.A.NO.1359/2011Affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondentno.10 has not been filed despite last opportunity havingbeen granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers alongwith appropriate office report showing thestatus of all the respondents.C.A.NO.9030/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented.-4-Item No.1Registry to give status of respondent nos. 5 to 13 inthe next office report as it has been mentioned that thereare 13 respondents.C.A.NO.9021/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are duly represented.None appears for respondent nos. 7 to 13, 15 to 18despite due service.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish address ofrespondent nos. 6,14 and 19 within two weeks time. Noticesthereafter be issued.C.A.NO.9024/2011Respondent no.41 is granted four weeks time as lastopportunity for filing counter affidavit.Await certificate of service in respect of respondentnos. 1-40, 42,53.C.A.NO.9025/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are granted four weeks time aslast opportunity for filing counter affidavit.None appears for respondent nos. 7 and 8 despite dueservice.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish freshaddress of respondent no.6 within two weeks time. Noticethereafter be issued.C.A.NO.9026/2011Await certificate of service in respect of respondentNos. 1 to 20 from the High Court. Reminder be issued.-5-Item No.1C.A.NO.9032/2011Await certificate of service in respect of therespondents from the High Court. Reminder be issued.C.A.NO.9030/2011

Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time aslast opportunity for filing counter affidavit.None appears for respondent nos.5,6,8,10,12,13,15,16,19 to 24, 27 to 29 despite dueservice.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish freshaddress of respondent nos. 7,9,17 and 25 within two weekstime. Notices thereafter be issued.Fresh notices be issued to respondent nos.11,14,18,26 and 30 also.C.A.NO.9031/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time aslast opportunity for filing counter affidavit.None appears for respondent nos. 5 to 17, 19 to 28despite due service.Last opportunity of three weeks time is granted forfiling application for substitution of legalrepresentatives of deceased respondent no.18, if otherwisepermissible. Registry thereafter to process under rules.C.A.NO.11358/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time aslast opportunity for filing counter affidavit.-6-Item No.1None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13,15 to18,20 and 21 despite due service,.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish completeaddress of respondent nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 within twoweeks time. Notices thereafter be issued.SLP(C) NO.12004/2014Despite last opportunity having been granted,respondent nos. 1 and 3 have not filed counter affidavit,as such, further opportunity is declined.None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service.C.A.NO.1456/2012Ld. Counsel for the appellant to file spare copies toeffect service on respondent no.67 within two weeks time.Notice thereafter be issued.Await certificate of service in respect of respondentnos. 54 and 55 from the High Court. Reminder be issued.SLP against respondent nos. 9,17,18,41,42,51 and 60has already been dismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016.C.A.NO.1461/2012SLP against respondent nos. 8,11,37,38 has beendismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016.C.A.NO.2621/2012Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish freshaddress of respondent nos.13-16,25-27,72-75, 88,89,98,117,134,137,138,139,141,142,145,147,154,161,163,47,68,44,102,-7-Item No.1152,153 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter beissued.Respondent Nos. 115 to 117, 108, are residing abroad.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take steps for effectingservice in accordance with GovernmentO.M.No.F.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011.C.A.NO.2738/2012Appeal against respondent nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28and 29 has been dismissed vide order dt.22.8.2016.Await certificate of service in respect of respondentno.33 from the High Court. Reminder be issued.C.A.NO.3665/2012Appeal against respondent no.7 has been dismissedvide order dt.22.8.2016.Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time aslast opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

C.A.NO.5006/2014Appeal against respondent nos.6,7,8,20,23,25,27,44,115,120,138,140 and 141 has been dismissed videorder dt.22.8.2016.C.A. No. 1351/2011None appears for respondent no.1 despite due service.Respondent no.2 is duly represented.C.A. No. 1352/2011None appears for respondent no.1 despite due service.Respondent no.3 is duly represented.-8-Item No.1Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish freshaddress of respondent no.2 within two weeks time as lastopportunity. Notice thereafter be issued.C.A. No. 1353/2011None appears for respondent nos.1-3 despite dueservice.C.A. No. 1354/2011None appears for respondent no.1 despite due service.C.A. No. 1355/2011None appears for the respondents despite due service.C.A. No. 1356/2011None appears for respondent nos.1-3 despite dueservice.Respondent no.4 is duly represented.C.A. No. 1357/2011Respondent No.1 is duly represented.None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service.C.A. No. 1358/2011Respondent No.1 is duly represented.None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service.Registry to submit the status of the remainingrespondents in all the matters in the next office report.C.A.NO.9023/2011Office report not received.List again on 3.1.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014 MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUS U.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s) Date : 18/10/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Sunita Gautam, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have filed counter affidavit but statement of case has not been filed and statutory period has also expired. Since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Listed on 18.10.2016 Court – R1 Item No. 42 SECTION­IIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL  APPELLATE  JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6405 OF  2014   Mohan Lal Goyal .....Appellant Versus U.O.I & Ors.                    .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 11 th August, 2016, when the following order was passed:­ “ Respondent Nos.1 and 3 have already filed the counter affidavit. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the Ld. Counsel for respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit.  Statement of case be also filed within the same period, if statutory period is not expired.  List again on 18.10.2016. ” It is submitted that no  Counter Affidavit  has been filed on behalf of respondent No.2 so far. Letter for filing the Statement of Case has been issued on 20.08.2016. Both the parties have not filed Statement of Case so far. The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court.    Dated this the 17 th  day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ 1. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Advocate 111, Lawyer's Chambers, R.K. Garg Block 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate 20­A,  Lawyer's Chambers    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR nk

\230ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUSU.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s)Date : 18/10/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Sunita Gautam, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent nos. 1 to 3 have filed counter affidavit butstatement of case has not been filed and statutory period hasalso expired.Since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in theSupreme Court Rules, 2013, registry to process the matterfor being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1459/2012 M/S.BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 2059/2012 C.A. No. 2194/2012 C.A. No. 2195/2012 C.A. No. 557/2013 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 241/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 240/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 29/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Ms. Lubna Naaz, Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram,Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Ms. Akriti Dewan, Adv. Mr. Bhargava V. Desai,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag, Adv. Mr. Vishwaman Kandwal, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Thakur, Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, Adv.

Item No.76 -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 1459/2012 Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. None appears for respondent Nos.4 and 6, despite due service. Respondent No.5 has already been dismissed. Parties have not filed statement of case, despite the expiry of the statutory period. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready. C.A. No. 2059/2012 Respondent Nos.1 to 4 are duly represented. None appears for respondent No.5, despite due service. Parties have not filed statement of case, despite the expiry of the statutory period. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready. C.A. No. 2194/2012 Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. None appears for respondent Nos.4 to 7, despite due service. Parties have filed statement of case. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready.

Item No.76 -3- C.A. No. 2195/2012 Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented and they have filed statement of case. None appears for respondent Nos.4 to 8, despite due service. Appellant has not filed statement of case, despite the expiry of the statutory period. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready. C.A. No. 557/2013 All the respondents are duly represented. Parties have not filed statement of case, despite the expiry of the statutory period. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready. C.A. No. 240/2016 Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are duly represented. None appears for the remaining respondents, despite due service. Parties have not filed statement of case, despite the expiry of the statutory period. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready. C.A. No. 241/2016 Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 are duly represented.

Item No.76 -4- None appears for respondent Nos.4 and 6 to 16, despite due service. Parties have not filed statement of case, despite the expiry of the statutory period. Registry to process all the matters for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION-III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1459 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APEAL NOS.2059, 2194 AND 2195 OF 2012, 557 OF 2013 AND 240 AND 241 OF 2016 M/S BARBEQUE NATIONAL HOSPITALITY LTD. ETC.ETC. … APPELLANT VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. … RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT FOR PRE FINAL HEARING CIVIL APPEAL NO.1459 OF 2012 It is submitted that there are 6 respondents. Respondent Nos.1-3 are represented through mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate. Certificae of Service has been received in respect of Respondent Nos.4 and 6 but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far. Civil appeal against Respondent No.5 stands dismissed vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 8 th October, 2013. It is further submitted that Counsel for both the parties have not filed Statement of Case despite this Registry's notice. Time to file Statement of Case has already expired as per amended rules. Appeal is ready for hearing. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2059 OF 2012 It is submitted that service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition is complete Respondent Nos.1 to 4 are represented through Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate and service on Respondent No.5 is complete through Certificate of Service received from the High Court. It is further submitted that Counsel for both the parties have not filed Statement of Case despite this Registry's notice. Time to file Statement of Case has already expired as per amended rules. Appeal is ready for hearing. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2194 OF 2012 It is submitted that servce of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete as Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are represented through Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate and Certificate of Service has been received from the High Court in respect of Respondent Nos.4 to 7 which shows that notice has been served on Respondent No.4 on 20 th December, 2012 and Respondent Nos.5 to 7 on 24 th December, 2012 but no one has filed vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents so

far. It is further submitted that counsel for the Appellant has filed Statement and Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 has also filed Statement of Case. Appeal is ready for hearing. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2195 OF 2016 It is submitted that there are 8 respondents in this matte. Service of Lodgement of Petition is complete as Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are represented trough Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate. Service is complete on Respondent Nos.4 to 8 through Certificate of Service received from the High Court but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that counsel for the Appellant has not filed Statement of Case and Counsel for the Respondent has filed Statement of Case. Time to file Statement of Case has already expired as per amended rules. Appeal is ready for hearing. CIVIL APPEAL NO.557 OF 2013 It is submitted that there are four respondents in the matter. Service of Lodgment of Petition is complete as all the four respondents are represented through Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate. It is further submitted that Counsel for both the parties have not filed Statement of case. Time to file Statement of Case has already expired as per amended rules Appeal is ready for hearing. CIVIL APPEAL NO.240 OF 2016 It is submitted that there are 11 respondents. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete as Respondent Nos.1 to 2 are represented through Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate. Service on rest of respondents is also complete but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant as well as counsel for the respondent have not filed Statement of Case despite this Registry's notice Time to file Statement of Case has already expired as per amended rules. Appeal is ready for hearing. CIVIL APPEAL NO.241 OF 2016 It is submitted that there are 16 respondents. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete as Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are represented through Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate and Respondent No.5 is represented through Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate. Service on rest of respondents is also complete but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of the said respondents so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant as well as Counsel for the respondents

have not filed Statement of Case despite this Registry's notice. Appeal is ready for hearing. The Office Report is listed before Ld. Registrar for pre final hearing. Dated this30 th day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Mr. M.P.Devanath, Advocate 5, Jangpura Extn., Link Road New Delhi 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Mohit D.Ram, Advocate, D-14, Nizamuddin East New Delhi 4. Mr. Bhargava V.Desai, Advocte, 70, Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court, New Delhi 5. Mr. Naveen Chandra, Advocate, 304, Lawyers Chambers Delhi High Court 6. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate, D-4/1, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-57 7. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, Advocates 8. Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

\206!ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALCivil Appeal No(s). 1459/2012M/S.BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITHC.A. No. 2059/2012C.A. No. 2194/2012C.A. No. 2195/2012C.A. No. 557/2013Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 241/2016Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 240/2016Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 29/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Ms. Lubna Naaz, Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram,Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Ms. Akriti Dewan, Adv. Mr. Bhargava V. Desai,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag, Adv. Mr. Vishwaman Kandwal, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Thakur, Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, Adv.Item No.76 -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A. No. 1459/2012Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented.None appears for respondent Nos.4 and 6, despite dueservice.Respondent No.5 has already been dismissed.Parties have not filed statement of case, despite theexpiry of the statutory period.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready.C.A. No. 2059/2012Respondent Nos.1 to 4 are duly represented.None appears for respondent No.5, despite due service.Parties have not filed statement of case, despite theexpiry of the statutory period.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready.C.A. No. 2194/2012Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented.None appears for respondent Nos.4 to 7, despite dueservice.Parties have filed statement of case.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready.Item No.76 -3-

C.A. No. 2195/2012Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented and they havefiled statement of case.None appears for respondent Nos.4 to 8, despite dueservice.Appellant has not filed statement of case, despite theexpiry of the statutory period.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready.C.A. No. 557/2013All the respondents are duly represented.Parties have not filed statement of case, despite theexpiry of the statutory period.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready.C.A. No. 240/2016Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are duly represented.None appears for the remaining respondents, despite dueservice.Parties have not filed statement of case, despite theexpiry of the statutory period.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready.C.A. No. 241/2016Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 are duly represented.Item No.76 -4-None appears for respondent Nos.4 and 6 to 16, despitedue service.Parties have not filed statement of case, despite theexpiry of the statutory period.Registry to process all the matters for being listedbefore the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 28/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Pravin Kumar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 6,7 and 9 to 11 despite due service. Despite last opportunity having been granted, affidavit of dasti service of respondent nos. 5 and 8 has not been filed. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

LITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 28/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Pravin Kumar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent Nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented.None appears for respondent nos. 6,7 and 9 to 11 despitedue service.Despite last opportunity having been granted, affidavitof dasti service of respondent nos. 5 and 8 has not beenfiled.Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further directions. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 7139/2012 CITY CENTRE Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 20/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for any of the respondents, despite due service. Appellant has filed the statement of case. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7139 OF 2012 M/s. City Centre         ........Appellant ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors.                                    ........Respondents OFFICE REPORT FOR PRE­FINAL HEARING It is submitted that there are five respondents in the matter above­mentioned. Certificate of service in respect of all the five respondents have been received from High Court which shows that Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal have been served on all the five respondents but no one has entered appearance so far.   It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has filed statement of case.    Appeal is ready for hearing. The office report for pre­final hearing is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court. Dated this the 19 th  day of September, 2016.                                                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy To:­ Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate 103, M.C. Setalvad, Lawyer's Chamber.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  C­I

jITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALCivil Appeal No(s). 7139/2012CITY CENTRE Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 20/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for any of the respondents, despite dueservice.Appellant has filed the statement of case.Registry to process the matter for being listed beforethe Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1351-1358/2011 C.A. No. 1359/2011 C.A. No. 9023/2011 C.A. No. 9031/2011 C.A. No. 11358/2011 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1456/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1461/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 31/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr D.P.Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv.

-2- Item No.6 Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. Mr Vikas Kumar, Adv Mr Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr Kailash Chand, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738, 3665 of 2012, C.A. No. 5006/2014 Deleted. C.A. No. 1323-1344/2011 Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. No.1338/2011 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. No.1329/2011 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. None appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No.1335/2011 and respondent nos. 1 to 3 in C.A.NO.1339/2011 despite due service.

-3- Item No.6 Await service of the sole respondent in C.A. No.1326,1334 of 2011 from the High Court. Reminder be issued. C.A. No.1359/2011 None appears for respondent nos. 1 to 9 and 11 to 14 despite due service. Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for filing affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent no.10. C.A. No.9023/2011 Alternative arrangement notice to both appellants have been received back with the report 'left and 'not known'. Certificate of service also not received from the High Court despite several efforts in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 23. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. C.A. No.9031/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 5 to 17 and 19 to 28 despite due service. Application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.18 has not been filed since 17.5.2013. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

-4- Item No.6 C.A.NO.11358/2011 Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13,15 to 18,20 and 21 despite due service. Spare copies and fresh address for service of respondent nos. 7 to 9,14 and 19 have not been filed/furnished since February, 2015. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 Respondent nos. 1 and 3 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. C.A. No. 1351-1358/2011 Office report not received. List again on 28.10.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1323­1344, 1359, 9023, 9031 AND 11358 OF 2011 AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © NO. 12004 OF 2014 Union of India & Ors. etc.etc. ...Appellants ­Versus­ M/s. Lifestyle International P. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT  CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1323­1344 AND 1359 OF 2011 The office report  was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 5 th  July, 2016 when the following order was passed: “ C.A. No    . 1323­1344/2011 ” Await certificate of service of the common sole respondent in C.A. Nos. 1326 and 1334/2011, sole respondent in C.A. No. 1329/2011, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No. 1335/2011, respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in C.A. No. 1339/2011 from the High Court. Reminder be issued to this effect. Fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. No. 1338/2011 to be furnished within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 1359/2011 None appears for respondent Nos. 5 and 12, despite due service. Fresh address of the unserved respondents to be furnished within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.” CIVIL APPEAL NO.1323­1344 OF 2011 It is submitted that reminder to the High Court was issued on 20 th  July, 2016 for sending the certificate of Service in respect of Common Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal Nos. 1326 and 1334 of 2011, Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1329 of 2011, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Civil Appeal 1335 of 2011, Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in Civil Appeal No. 1339 of 2011. The High Court of Delhi vide its letter dated 5 th  August, 2016 has sent Service report of Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal which shows that the notice has been served on Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Civil Appeal No. 1335 of 2011 and

Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in Civil Appeal No. 1339 of 2011 but no one has entered appearance so far.  It is also submitted that Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1329 of 2011 is unserved as Office of the said Company has been shifted from the given address and now it is lying vacant as per certificate of service received from High Court. It is also submitted that Certificate of Service in respect of Common sole Respondent in Civil Appeal Nos. 1326 & 1334 of 2011 is awaited. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Appellant has not furnished fresh address of Sole Respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1338 of 2011 viz. M/s Saffron Foods (P) Ltd. so far. Hence fresh Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal could not be issued. C.A. NO. 1359 OF 2011 It is submitted that Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate has filed letter requesting to serve Respondent No. 10 through Dasti and the same was placed before the Ld. Registrar on 27 th  July, 2016 and the request for dasti service allowed.  Accordingly, dasti notice was issued to Counsel for the Appellant on 2 nd  August, 2016 for effecting service on respondent no. 10 but he has not filed affidavit of dasti service alongwith prof of service so far.  It is also submitted that there are 14 Respondents in the matter. A.D. Card duly signed has been received from Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 8, 9, 11 and 13, but no one has entered appearance so far. Certificate of Service has been received from High Court in respect of 2,4 to 6, 7, 12 and 14 but no one has entered appearance so far. CIVIL APPEAL No. 9023 OF 2011 It is submitted that there are 23 Respondents and 2 Appellants in this matter. Mr. M.P. Jha, Counsel for the Appellants has since died. Notice for making alternative arrangement wasissued on 1 st  June, 2016 and unserved cover has been received  with postal remarks “Left” and “not known” from the both Appellants. Service is not complete on Respondent Nos. 1 to 23 as certificate of service has not been received so far despite this registry's letter dated 22th November, 2011, 19 th September, 2011, D.O. letter dated 9 th  February, 2013, 18 th  November, 2014 and 3 rd June, 2016.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 9031 OF 2011 It is submitted that there are 28 Respondents in this matter Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Service is complete on Respondent nos. 5 to 17, 19 to 28 through certificate of  Service received from the High Court, but no one has entered Appearance so far.  It is also submitted that Respondent No. 18 has since expired as per certificate of Service received through High Court, but Counsel for the Appellant has not filed application for substitution to bring on record legal representatives' list of deceased Respondent No. 16 despite this Registry's letter dated 17 th  May, 2013, 17 th  November, 2014 and 23 rd May, 2016 so far. CIVIL APPEAL No.11358 OF 2011 It is submitted that there are twenty one respondents in this Appeal.  Service of Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents except respondent Nos. 7 to 9, 14 and 19.  Mr. B. K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 to 4 and Certificate of Service has been received from the High Court which shows that notice has been served on respondent Nos. 5, 6, 10 to 13, 15 to 18, 20 and 21 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents. Certificate of Service has been received back from the High Court in respect of respondent No. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 with remarks that “incomplete address.” It is further submitted that counsel for the appellant has not filed fresh and complete address in respect of respondent No. 7 to 9, 14 and 19 along with two copies of petition of appeal for effecting service on respondent Nos. 8 & 9 so far despite Registry request dated 16 th  February, 2015 and 24 th  May, 2016.   SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © NO. 12004 OF 2014 It is submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. It is lastly submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2, through served with notice. Service of Notice is complete.

The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 30 th  day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate 161/52, 3rd Floor, Flat No.8, Jogabai, Jamia Nagar New Delhi­110 025 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate, 304, 3rd Floor, Somdutt Chamber, 9, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, D­28 (L.G.F.), Jangpura Extn. New Delhi­110 014 5. Mr. Nilofar Qureshi, Advocate                                 G­20, Vardhman City II Plaza, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­110 002 6. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate, Library 2, Supreme Court,  7.  Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate 55, Old Lawyers Chambers  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

ò%ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSM/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s)WITHC.A. No. 1351-1358/2011C.A. No. 1359/2011C.A. No. 9023/2011C.A. No. 9031/2011C.A. No. 11358/2011Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1456/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1461/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014Interim Relief and Office Report)Date : 31/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr D.P.Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv.-2-Item No.6 Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr Anupam Yadav, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. Mr Vikas Kumar, Adv Mr Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr Kailash Chand, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738, 3665 of 2012, C.A. No.5006/2014Deleted. C.A. No. 1323-1344/2011Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish fresh addressof the sole respondent in C.A. No.1338/2011 within twoweeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued.Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish freshaddress of the sole respondent in C.A. No.1329/2011

within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued.None appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in C.A.No.1335/2011 and respondent nos. 1 to 3 in C.A.NO.1339/2011despite due service.-3-Item No.6Await service of the sole respondent in C.A.No.1326,1334 of 2011 from the High Court. Reminder beissued.C.A. No.1359/2011None appears for respondent nos. 1 to 9 and 11 to 14despite due service.Last opportunity of three weeks is granted for filingaffidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent no.10.C.A. No.9023/2011Alternative arrangement notice to both appellants havebeen received back with the report 'left and 'not known'. Certificate of service also not received from the HighCourt despite several efforts in respect of respondent nos.1 to 23.Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further directions.C.A. No.9031/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented.None appears for respondent nos. 5 to 17 and 19 to 28despite due service.Application for substitution of legal representativesof deceased respondent no.18 has not been filed since17.5.2013.Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further directions.-4-Item No.6C.A.NO.11358/2011Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented.None appears for respondent nos. 5,6,10 to 13,15 to18,20 and 21 despite due service.Spare copies and fresh address for service ofrespondent nos. 7 to 9,14 and 19 have not beenfiled/furnished since February, 2015.Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further directions.SLP(C) NO.12004/2014Respondent nos. 1 and 3 are granted four weeks time aslast opportunity for filing counter affidavit.None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service.C.A. No. 1351-1358/2011Office report not received.List again on 28.10.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

1 ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) WITH C.A. No. 1461/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 2621/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 2738/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (office report on default) Date : 22/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Ms. Sanya Talwar, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. L. Charnaya,Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv.

2 For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. M. Khairti, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mrs. Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellants to comply with the office report dated 22.7.2016 failing which the Civil Appeals qua unserved respondents and the deceased non-substituted respondents shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1461/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2621/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2738/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3665/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5006/2014 O R D E R As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellants to comply with the office report dated 22.7.2016 failing which the Civil Appeals qua unserved respondents and the deceased non-substituted respondents shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. ..............J. (AMITAVA ROY) NEW DELHI AUGUST 22, 2016

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738 & 3665 OF 2012 AND 5006 OF 2014 Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. & Ors. ... Appellants ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The office report regarding service position was listed before Learned Registrar's Court on 10 th  March, 2016 when  the following order was passed: “ CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1456/2012 Three weeks time, as last opportunity is granted for filing spare copy for service of respondent no. 67 and Notice be issued thereafter.  Await service of respondent nos. 54 and 55 from the Hon'ble High Court and reminder be issued to this effect.  Three weeks time, as last opportunity is granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41 and 42. Notice be issued thereafter. Despite last opportunity having been granted, application for substitution of Lrs. Of deceased respondent no. 57 has not been filed. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1461/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 8, 37 and 38 and for making application for bringing Lrs. of deceased respondent no. 11 on record, the steps have not been taken nor the application has been filed. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2621/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishing complete address of respondent nos. 13, 14, 16, 25­27, 44, 47, 68, 72, 90, 102, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161, 163 the address has not been furnished and also despite last opportunity having been granted, steps in terms of Govt. OM F.No. 12(77)/10­Judl. have not been taken in respect of respondent nos. 108, 115­117. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber.

­2­ Application for substitution of Lrs. Of deceased respondent nos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 has not been filed despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Judge­in­chamber on this ground also. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 74 and 75 from the Hon'ble High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2738/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 5­8, 13, 20­24, 28 and 29, address has not been furnished. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent no.33 from the Hon'ble High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3665/2012 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1­4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Application for deletion of respondent no. 7 has not been filed despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5006/2014 Despite last opportunity having been granted for making application for substitution of Lrs. Of respondent nos. 7, 8, 20, 23, 25, 27, 44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 the application has not been filed and also despite last opportunity having been granted, fresh steps for service of respondent no. 6 have not been taken. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber.” Status in each of the matter is as under: CIVIL APPEAL NO.1456 OF 2012 It is submitted that reminder dated 19 th  July, 2016 was sent to the High Court of Delhi for forwarding the certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 54, 55 and 67 but the same has not been received from the High Court. Counsel for the appellant has not furnished the better particulars of respondent nos. 9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41, 42 so far.  It is further submitted that counsel for the appellant has also not filed application for substitution, in respect of respondent no. 57

­3­ CIVIL APPEAL No.1461 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent nos. 8, 37 and 38 and he has also not filed an application for substitution for bringing on record legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 11 so far. C.A. No. 2621 OF 2012  It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished latest and fresh complete  addresses of unserved respondent nos. 13, 14, 16, 25­27, 44, 47, 68, 72, 90, 102, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161,163.  He has also not taken steps in accordance with the government O.M. F.No. 12(77)/10­Judl. dated August 2011, to effect service on respondent nos. 115­117, 108  who are residing abroad.  It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed application for substitution to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 on record. Certificate of service has not been received from the High Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 74 and 75 despite registry's reminder dated 2 nd  July, 2016.  C.A. No. 2738 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh addresses of unserved respondent nos. 5­8, 13, 20­24, 28 and 29.  It is further submitted that High Court of Delhi has on 25 th  April, 2016 forwarded Certificate of Service in respect of Respondent Nos. 33 which shows that notice has been served on the said respondent on 23 rd  March, 2015. C.A.No. 3665 OF 2012    It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed Application for deletion  the name of Respondent No.7 from the array of parties so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has not filed counter affidavit so far.

­4­ C.A. No. 5006 OF 2014 It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed application for  substitution for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos.7,8,20,23, 25, 27, 44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps for service of notice in respect of respondent no. 6 so far. The office report on default is listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for Orders. Dated this the 22 nd  day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate 161/52, 3rd Floor, Flat No.8, Jogabai, Jamia Nagar New Delhi­110 025 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate, 304, 3rd Floor, Somdutt Chamber, 9, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, D­28 (L.G.F.), Jangpura Extn. New Delhi­110 014 5. Mr. Nilofar Qureshi, Advocate                                 G­20, Vardhman City II Plaza, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­110 002 6. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate, Library 2, Supreme Court,  7.  Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate 55, Old Lawyers Chambers  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

1 ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) WITH C.A. No. 1461/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 2621/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 2738/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (office report on default) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (office report on default) Date : 22/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Ms. Sanya Talwar, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. L. Charnaya,Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv.Digitally signed byRASHMI DHYANIDate: 2016.08.26 Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv.11:35:05 ISTReason: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. 2For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. M. Khairti, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mrs. Rani Chhabra,Adv.

Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellants to comply with the office report dated 22.7.2016 failing which the Civil Appeals qua unserved respondents and the deceased non-substituted respondents shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (RASHMI DHYANI) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1461/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2621/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2738/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO.3665/2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO.5006/2014 O R D E R As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to thecounsel for the appellants to comply with the office reportdated 22.7.2016 failing which the Civil Appeals qua unservedrespondents and the deceased non-substituted respondentsshall stand dismissed without further reference to theCourt. ..............J. (AMITAVA ROY)NEW DELHIAUGUST 22, 2016

ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014 MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUS U.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s) Date : 11/08/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Sudha Pal, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos.1 and 3 have already filed the counter affidavit. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the Ld. Counsel for respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit. Statement of case be also filed within the same period, if statutory period is not expired. List again on 18.10.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.  6405  of 2014     Mohan Lal Goyal                                                                        ...Appellant ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors.                                                               ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 28 th  April, 2016, when the following order was passed:­ “Respondent nos. 1 and 3 have already filed counter affidavit.  Respondent no. 2 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.  List again on 11.8.2016.” It is submitted that service of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal is complete. There are three respondents.  Respondent No. 1 and 3 are represented through Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate and respondent No. 2 is represented through Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate. It is further submitted that Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 has filed counter affidavit but counsel for respondent No. 2 has not filed counter affidavit so far. It is lastly submitted that counsel for both the parties have not filed statement of case.  As per amended rules SCR 2013 Appeal is ready for hearing. The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court. Dated this the  10 th   day of  August, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

­2­ Copy to : 1 Mr. B.K. Prasad,  Advocate Central Agency Section. 2 Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Advocate  Lawyers Chamber No. 111. 3 Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate  20­A, Lawyers Chambers.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c3

pITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALCivil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUSU.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s)Date : 11/08/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Sudha Pal, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent Nos.1 and 3 have already filed the counteraffidavit.Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to theLd. Counsel for respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit.Statement of case be also filed within the same period, ifstatutory period is not expired.List again on 18.10.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 03/08/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Karan Seth, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented None appears for respondent nos. 6,7 and 9 to 11 despite due service. Last opportunity of two weeks is granted for filing affidavit of dasti service of respondent nos. 5 and 8. List again on 28.9.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION­III            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11441 OF 2011 Great Indian Restaurant Co. Pvt. Ltd.                     ......Appellant        ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors.              ......Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 27 th January, 2015, when the following order was passed:­ “Though the Ld. Counsel was earlier given opportunity to furnish fresh and complete address in respect of respondent nos. 5 and 8, however, the ld. Counsel for the appellant suggests that the permission to serve notice upon the unserved respondents may be effected by dasti. Permission as sought for is granted. Receive the dasti notices from the registry within one week and effecting service upon the unserved respondents within four weeks. File proof of service by the date fixed next. List again on 13.3.2015.” It is submitted that dasti notice was handed over to counsel for the appellant on 19 th March, 2015 for effecting service on unserved respondent Nos. 5 and 8 with a request to file affidavit of dasti service alongwith proof of service but the counsel for the appellant has not filed the same so far. It is further submitted that there are 11 respondents in the matter. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Service is complete on respondent Nos. 6, 7, 9, 10 & 11 through certificate of service but on one has entered appearance so far. Service is incomplete in respect of respondent Nos. 5 & 8. The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court for orders.  Dated this the 30 th  day of July, 2016.                                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, Advocate Ch. No. 497, Lawyer's Chamber Complex, Patiala House Courts. 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section.         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c1

dITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 03/08/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Karan Seth, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly representedNone appears for respondent nos. 6,7 and 9 to 11 despitedue service.Last opportunity of two weeks is granted for filingaffidavit of dasti service of respondent nos. 5 and 8.List again on 28.9.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.88 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1359/2011 C.A. No. 11195/2011 C.A. No. 1456/2012 C.A. No. 1461/2012 C.A. No. 2621/2012 C.A. No. 2738/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 05/07/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Praneet Ranjan, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Ritwik Navet, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.

Item No.88 -2- For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 1323-1344/2011 Await certificate of service of the common sole respondent in C.A. Nos.1326 and 1334/2011, sole respondent in C.A. No.1329/2011, respondent Nos.1 and 2 in C.A. No.1335/2011, respondent Nos.1 to 3 in C.A. No.1339/2011 from the High Court. Reminder be issued to this effect. Fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. No.1338/2011 to be furnished within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 1359/2011 None appears for respondent Nos.5 and 12, despite due service. Fresh address of the unserved respondents to be furnished within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 11195/2011 All the respondents have already filed counter affidavit. As such, the matter stands complete. To be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters.

Item No.88 -3- C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 None appears for all the respondents, despite due service. Appellant has not filed the statement of case. It is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. As such, the matter stands complete. To be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters. C.A. No. 1456,1461,2621,2738,3665 and 5006/2014 Deleted. SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 File and office report not received. List again on 31.8.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1323­1344 of 2011 WITH  CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1359, 11195 OF 2011 AND 3087­3088 OF 2015 Union of India & Ors. etc.etc. ... Appellants ­Versus­ M/s Lifestyle International P. Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents OFFICE REPORT  The office report regarding service position was listed before the Ld. Registrar's  Court on 10 th  March, 2016, when he was pleased to pass the following Order:­ " CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1323­1344/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, the appellant has not furnished fresh address of sole respondent in CA Nos. 1326, 1344, 1338 and 1329 of 2011 and respondent no. 1 and 2 in CA No. 1335/2011 and both the respondents in CA No. 1339/2011. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1359/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, the appellant has not taken fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 5, 10 and 12. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3087/2015 Service is complete but none appears for any of the respondents. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Court. List again on 05.07.2016. ” Service Position of each matter is as under:­ CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1323­1344 OF 2011 It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has on 5 th  April, 2016 filed fresh and complete address and spare copies of petition of Appeal in respect of unserved respondents viz.   Common sole respondent in C.A. Nos. 1326 and 1334, Sole respondent in C.A. No. 1329 of 2011,  Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No 1335 of

­2­ 2011,  Respondent No. 1 in C.A. No. 1339 of 2011 and Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in C.A. No. 1339 of 2011.  Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal was issued to all the unserved respondents through High Court on 11 th  May, 2016, but Certificate of service has not been received from the High Court so far. It is submitted that certificate of service has been received from the High Court in respect of sole respondent in C.A. No. 1338 of 2011, which shows that “company does not exist”. Counsel for the appellant has not filed fresh and complete address so far. CIVIL APPEAL No. 1359 of 2011     It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has on 5 th  April, 2016 filed fresh and complete address of unserved respondent Nos. 5, 10 and 12. Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal was issued to the unserved respondents through High Court on 3 rd May, 2016.  Certificate of service has been received from the High Court on unserved respondent Nos. 5, 10 and 12, which shows that notice has been served on respondent No. 5 on 9 th  May, 2016 and Respondent No. 12 on 12 th  May, 2016, Respondent No. 10 has been returned unserved with remarks that Respondent No. 10 Sh. Mohinder Jeet Singh does not reside at this address and he was tenant in the said property and left 15 years back.  Letter has been issued to the Counsel for the appellant for filing fresh and complete address on Respondent No. 10 on 1 st  July, 2016. Service of notice is complete on Respondent Nos. 5 and 12. CIVIL APPEAL No. 11195 of 2011   It is submitted that there are four respondents.  Service of  Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the four respondents as Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of the said respondents. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant as well as counsel for the respondent has not filed statement of case.  Time granted has already been expired as per amended rules.  Appeal is ready for hearing.

­3­ C.A. NOS. 3087­3088 OF 2015 It is submitted that Service of Notice is complete on all the four Respondents, but no one has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of Respondents.  It is further submitted that Notice for filing the Statement of Case has been issued on 6 th  April, 2016 to the Appellant, but he has not filed Statement of Case so far.  The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court. Dated this the 4 th  day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. 2. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,  Advocate          48, Lawyer's Chambers 3. M/s O.P. Khaitan & Co., Advocates B­1, Defence Colony, New Delhi­024 4. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocates 95, Lawyers Chambers 5. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocates Chamber No. 92        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

ø ITEM NO.88 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1359/2011 C.A. No. 11195/2011 C.A. No. 1456/2012 C.A. No. 1461/2012 C.A. No. 2621/2012 C.A. No. 2738/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 05/07/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Praneet Ranjan, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Ritwik Navet, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv.Digitally signed bySONALI SAUNDDate: 2016.07.06 Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv.12:05:03 ISTReason: Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Item No.88 -2-For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.

Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A. No. 1323-1344/2011 Await certificate of service of the common solerespondent in C.A. Nos.1326 and 1334/2011, sole respondent inC.A. No.1329/2011, respondent Nos.1 and 2 in C.A.No.1335/2011, respondent Nos.1 to 3 in C.A. No.1339/2011 fromthe High Court. Reminder be issued to this effect. Fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. No.1338/2011to be furnished within two weeks. Notice thereafter beissued.C.A. No. 1359/2011 None appears for respondent Nos.5 and 12, despite dueservice. Fresh address of the unserved respondents to be furnishedwithin two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.C.A. No. 11195/2011 All the respondents have already filed counter affidavit. As such, the matter stands complete. To be listed beforethe Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters.Item No.88 -3-C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 None appears for all the respondents, despite dueservice. Appellant has not filed the statement of case. It is no more a mandate after the amendment in theSupreme Court Rules, 2013. As such, the matter stands complete. To be listed beforethe Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters.C.A. No. 1456,1461,2621,2738,3665 and 5006/2014 Deleted.SLP(C) No. 12004/2014

File and office report not received. List again on 31.8.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014 MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUS U.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s) Date : 28/04/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Sumanta S Bandyopadhyay, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1 and 3 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.2 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List again on 11.8.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

VITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUSU.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s)Date : 28/04/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Sumanta S Bandyopadhyay, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent nos. 1 and 3 have already filed counteraffidavit.Respondent no.2 is granted four weeks time for filingcounter affidavit.List again on 11.8.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARUL Civil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014 MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUS U.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s) Date : 29/03/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice for alternative arrangement in respect of appellant has been received back with remarks 'Left'. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant undertakes to file vakalatnama. Two weeks time, as last opportunity, is granted for filing vakalatnama. List again on 28.4.2016. (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 6405  of 2014 Mohan Lal Goyal ...Appellant ­Versus­ Union of India and others ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11­07­2014  when the Court was pleased to pass the following orders: “Delay condoned.   Leave granted.   To be heard along with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011 arising out of SLP © No.27636/2011.   Until further orders, no coercive steps shall be taken during the pendency of this appeal, for recovery of the amount in question.” It is submitted that there are three respondents. Respondent Nos.1 and 3 represented through Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate and Respondent No.2 is represented through Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate. It is further submitted that Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Advocate representing Appellants expired and notices for alternative arrangements were sent to both the appellants on 29­07­15 and subsequent reminder on 21­12­15 but same have been received back with postal remarks “Left”.  The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court for orders.  Dated this the 19th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c5

\230ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARULCivil Appeal No(s). 6405/2014MOHAN LAL GOYAL Appellant(s) VERSUSU.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s)Date : 29/03/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNotice for alternative arrangement in respect of appellant hasbeen received back with remarks 'Left'. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, ld. Counsel appearing for the appellantundertakes to file vakalatnama. Two weeks time, as lastopportunity, is granted for filing vakalatnama. List again on 28.4.2016. (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1359/2011 (With C.A. No. 1456/2012 (With C.A. No. 1461/2012 (With C.A. No. 2621/2012 (With C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/03/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Awadehesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini, adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Hemant Bajaj, Adv. Mr. M.P. Levanth, Adv.

Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. Mr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Ravi Chhabra, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1323-1344/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, the appellant has not furnished fresh address of sole respondent in CA Nos. 1326, 1344, 1338 and 1329 of 2011 and respondent no. 1 and 2 in CA No. 1335/2011 and both the respondents in CA No. 1339/2001. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1359/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, the appellant has not taken fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 5, 10 and 12. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1456/2012 Three weeks time, as last opportunity is granted for filing spare copy for service of respondent no. 67 and Notice be issued thereafter. Await service of respondent nos. 54 and 55 from the Hon'ble

High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. Three weeks time, as last opportunity is granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41 and 42. Notice be issued thereafter. Despite last opportunity having been granted, application for substitution of Lrs. Of deceased respondent no. 57 has not been filed. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1461/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 8, 37 and 38 and for making application for bringing Lrs. of deceased respondent no. 11 on record, the steps have not been taken nor the application has been filed. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2621/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishing complete address of respondent nos. 13, 14, 16, 25-27, 44, 47, 68, 72, 90, 102, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161, 163 the address has not been furnished and also despite last opportunity having been granted, steps in terms of Govt. OM F.No. 12(77)/10-Judl. have not been taken in respect of respondent nos. 108, 115-117. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber.

Application for substitution of Lrs. Of deceased respondent nos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 has not been filed despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Judge-in-chamber on this ground also. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 74 and 75 from the Hon'ble High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2738/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 5-8, 13, 20-24, 28 and 29, address has not been furnished. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent no.33 from the Hon'ble High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3665/2012 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1-4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Application for deletion of respondent no. 7 has not been filed despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5006/2014 Despite last opportunity having been granted for making

application for substitution of Lrs. Of respondent nos. 7, 8, 20, 23, 25, 27, 44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 the application has not been filed and also despite last opportunity having been granted, fresh steps for service of respondent no. 6 have not been taken. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12004/2014 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1-3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent no. 2 despite due service. Service of alternative arrangement notice is also complete but none appears. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3087/2015 Service is complete but none appears for any of the respondents. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Court. List again on 05.07.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1323­1344 of 2011 WITH  CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1359 OF 2011, 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738 & 3665 OF 2012 AND 5006 OF 2014 AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © 12004 OF 2014 AND  CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3087­3088 OF 2015 Union of India & Ors. etc.etc. ... Appellants ­Versus­ M/s Lifestyle International P. Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents OFFICE REPORT  CIVIL APPEAL NO.1323­1344, 1359 OF 2011, 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738 & 3665 OF 2012 AND 5006 OF 2014 AND SLP © 12004 OF 2014 The office report dated 11 th  January 2016 was listed before Learned Registrar on 12 th  January when he was pleased to pass the following order: “ Civil Appeal No(s). 1323­1344/2011 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing the fresh address for service of sole respondent in C.A Nos. 1326, 1334, 1338, 1329 of 2011, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A No.1335/2011 and both respondents in C.A No.1339/2011. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.1359/2011 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking steps for service of respondent nos. 5,10 and 12. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.1456/2012 Spare copies be filed for respondent No.67 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 54 and 55 and opportunity of four weeks is granted for furnishing the fresh address for respondent nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41 and 42.Notices thereafter be issued. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing application for substitution of respondent no.57. ...2/­

­2­ C.A.NO.1461/2012  Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for furnishing fresh complete address of respondent nos. 8,37 and 38 and filing application for substitution of respondent no.11. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.2621/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for frunishing fresh complete address of respondent nos. 13,14,16,25 to 27, 72,90, 117,138,142,147,154,161,163,47,68,44 and 102. Notices thereafter be issued. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking steps as per Government O.M. No.F.12(77)/10­Judl. dt.18.8.2011 for service of respondent nos. 115 to 117, 108 and 116. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking steps for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152, 153. Await certificate of service from the High Court with regard to respondent nos. 74 and 75. C.A.NO.2738/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos.5­8, 13,20­,24,28 and 29 and await certificate of service from the High Court with regard to respondent no.33. Reminder be issued. C.A.NO.3665/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing application for deletion of the name of respondent no.7. Opportunity to file counter affidavit to respondent nos. 1 to 4 has already been declined.  C.A.NO.5006/2014 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing application for substitution of respondent nos. 7,8,20,23,25,27,44,115,120,138,140 and 141.  Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no.6 within four weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 The ld. Counsel, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Ms Usha Nandini V submits that the erstwhile ld. Counsel for the petitioner in this case has expired. He seeks time for filing vakalatnama. Be filed within four weeks time. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 and 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.  None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. List again on 10.3.2016 .” ...3/-

­3­ CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1323­1344/2011 It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not furnish the fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. Nos. 1326,1334, 1338 and 1329 of 2011. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No 1335 of 2011. Both respondents in C.A. No 1339 of 2011 so far. Hence notice could not be issued on the unserved respondents. CIVIL APPEAL No.1359 of 2011        It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not taken steps on the unserved respondents Nos. 5, 10 and 12 so far. CIVIL APPEAL NO.1456 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not filed spare copy of the appeal on the unserved respondent no. 67 Certificate of service has not been received from the High Court on Respondent no. 54 and 55.  He has not furnished the better particulars on respondent nos. 9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41, 42 so far.  Respondent no. 57 since now deceased, Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed application for substitution.  CIVIL APPEAL No.1461 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent nos. 8, 37 and 38.  He has not filed an application for substitution of the deceased respondent no. 11  so far.  C.A. No. 2621 OF 2012  It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent nos. 13, 14, 16, 25­27, 72, 90, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161, 163, 47, 68, 44 102.  He has also not taken steps in accordance with the government O.M. dated August 2011, to effect service on respondent nos. 115­117, 108 and 116 who are residing abroad.  ...4/­ ­4­

It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 on record. Certificate of service has not been received from the High Court on Respondent Nos. 74 and 75 despite registry's request.  C.A. No. 2738 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent nos. 5­8, 13, 20, 24, 28 and 29.  It is further submitted that certificate of service has not been received from High Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 33. C.A.No. 3665 OF 2012    It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed Application for deletion of the name of Respondent No.7 from the array of parties so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has not filed counter affidavit so far.  C.A. No. 5006 OF 2014 It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed application for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent nos.7,8,20,23, 25, 27, 44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 on record so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps in respect of respondent no.6. SLP © No.12004/2014 It is submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. It is further submitted that A.D.Card duly siged has been received from the petitioner after receiving notice of alternative arrangement, but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the petitioner so far. It is lastly submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2, through served with notice. ...5/­ ­5­

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3087­3088 OF 2015 The matter was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16 th  March 2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following orders: “ Delay condoned. Leave granted.  Tag with Civil Appeal No.8390 of 2011. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellant for recovery of arrears of service tax which had become due on or before 30 th  September, 2011. We clarify that there is no stay of imposition of service tax under sub­clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar as the future liability towards service tax with effect from 1 st  October, 2011 is concerned.” Accordingly,  Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal was issued on 4 th June 2015 to all the Four Respondents through High Court. Certificates of Service of said Notice in respect of all the four Respondent have been received from the High Court, which shows that all the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 have been served with said Notice on 30 th  September 2015, 10 th  July 2015 and 22 nd  July 2015, but no one has filed Vakalatnama/ Apppearance on behalf of all the Four Respondents so far.  The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court. Dated this the 11th day of January, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate 161/52, 3rd Floor, Flat No.8, Jogabai, Jamia Nagar New Delhi­110 025 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate, 304, 3rd Floor, Somdutt Chamber, 9, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, D­28 (L.G.F.), Jangpura Extn. New Delhi­110 014 5. Mr. Nilofar Qureshi, Advocate                                 G­20, Vardhman City II Plaza, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­110 002 6. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate, Library 2, Supreme Court,  7.  Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate 55, Old Lawyers Chambers  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

ì: ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1359/2011 (With C.A. No. 1456/2012 (With C.A. No. 1461/2012 (With C.A. No. 2621/2012 (With C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 3087-3088/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/03/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Awadehesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini, adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2016.03.11 Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv.14:34:04 ISTReason: Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Hemant Bajaj, Adv. Mr. M.P. Levanth, Adv. Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. Mr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Ravi Chhabra, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Sony, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.

Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1323-1344/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, the appellanthas not furnished fresh address of sole respondent in CA Nos. 1326,1344, 1338 and 1329 of 2011 and respondent no. 1 and 2 in CA No.1335/2011 and both the respondents in CA No. 1339/2001. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1359/2011 Despite last opportunity having been granted, the appellanthas not taken fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 5, 10 and12. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1456/2012 Three weeks time, as last opportunity is granted for filingspare copy for service of respondent no. 67 and Notice be issuedthereafter. Await service of respondent nos. 54 and 55 from the Hon'bleHigh Court and reminder be issued to this effect. Three weeks time, as last opportunity is granted forfurnishing fresh address of respondent nos. 9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41and 42. Notice be issued thereafter. Despite last opportunity having been granted, application forsubstitution of Lrs. Of deceased respondent no. 57 has not beenfiled. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1461/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishing

fresh address of respondent nos. 8, 37 and 38 and for makingapplication for bringing Lrs. of deceased respondent no. 11 onrecord, the steps have not been taken nor the application has beenfiled. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2621/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishingcomplete address of respondent nos. 13, 14, 16, 25-27, 44, 47, 68,72, 90, 102, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161, 163 the address has notbeen furnished and also despite last opportunity having beengranted, steps in terms of Govt. OM F.No. 12(77)/10-Judl. have notbeen taken in respect of respondent nos. 108, 115-117. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. Application for substitution of Lrs. Of deceased respondentnos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 hasnot been filed despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeJudge-in-chamber on this ground also. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent nos. 74and 75 from the Hon'ble High Court and reminder be issued to thiseffect. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2738/2012 Despite last opportunity having been granted for furnishingfresh address of respondent nos. 5-8, 13, 20-24, 28 and 29, addresshas not been furnished. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent no.33from the Hon'ble High Court and reminder be issued to this effect. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3665/2012

Opportunity to respondent nos. 1-4 to file counter affidavithas already been declined. Application for deletion of respondent no. 7 has not beenfiled despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5006/2014 Despite last opportunity having been granted for makingapplication for substitution of Lrs. Of respondent nos. 7, 8, 20,23, 25, 27, 44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 the application has notbeen filed and also despite last opportunity having been granted,fresh steps for service of respondent no. 6 have not been taken. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12004/2014 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1-3 to file counter affidavithas already been declined. None appears for respondent no. 2 despite due service. Service of alternative arrangement notice is also complete butnone appears. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Judge-in-chamber. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3087/2015 Service is complete but none appears for any of therespondents. As such, Registry to process the matter for listing beforeHon'ble Court. List again on 05.07.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No.7/2013 in Civil Appeal No.8390/2011 M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &ORS Respondent(s) (for impleadment) Date : 08/02/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. B. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.7 seeks impleadment of applicant as co-appellant in pending Appeal No.8390/2011. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. The application for impleadment is allowed and M/s Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. is impleaded as applellant No.2 in C.A.No.8390/2011. Amended cause title be filed within seven days. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (CHANDER BALA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ðITEM NO.6 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.7/2013 in Civil Appeal No.8390/2011M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA &ORS Respondent(s)(for impleadment)Date : 08/02/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER]For Appellant(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. B. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RI.A.No.7 seeks impleadment of applicant as co-appellantin pending Appeal No.8390/2011.The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. The application for impleadment is allowed and M/s AdityaBirla Nuvo Ltd. is impleaded as applellant No.2 inC.A.No.8390/2011. Amended cause title be filed within seven days.(USHA BHARDWAJ) (CHANDER BALA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 7/2013 in Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011 M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &ORS Respondent(s) (for impleadment) Date : 21/01/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Ms. Sunita Rani, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No-one appears for the appellant. List after one week. (RASHMI DHYANI) SR.P.A. (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER

âITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 7/2013 in Civil Appeal No. 8390/2011M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA &ORS Respondent(s)(for impleadment)Date : 21/01/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Ms. Sunita Rani, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNo-one appears for the appellant.List after one week.(RASHMI DHYANI)SR.P.A. (SUMAN JAIN)COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1359/2011 (With C.A. No. 1456/2012 (With C.A. No. 1461/2012 (With C.A. No. 2621/2012 (With C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 12/01/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr Mohan Lal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr Abhishek Anand, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr V Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.

-2- Item No.3 For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr Darpan Bhuyan, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr Ashish Garg,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing the fresh address for service of sole respondent in C.A Nos. 1326, 1334, 1338, 1329 of 2011, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A No.1335/2011 and both respondents in C.A No.1339/2011. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.1359/2011 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking steps for service of respondent nos. 5,10 and 12. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.1456/2012 Spare copies be filed for respondent No.67 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 54 and 55 and opportunity of four weeks is granted for furnishing the fresh address for respondent nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41 and 42.Notices thereafter be issued.

-3- Item No.3 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing application for substitution of respondent no.57. C.A.NO.1461/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for furnishing fresh complete address of respondent nos. 8,37 and 38 and filing application for substitution of respondent no.11. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.2621/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing fresh address of respondent nos. 13,14,16,25 to 27, 72,90, 117,138,142,147,154,161,163,47,68,44 and 102. Notices thereafter be issued. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking steps as per Government O.M. No.F.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011 for service of respondent nos. 115 to 117, 108 and 116. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking steps for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 15,73,88,89,98,134,137,139,141,145,152,153. Await certificate of service from the High Court with regard to respondent nos. 74 and 75. C.A.NO.2738/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for furnishing fresh address of respondent nos.5-8, 13,20-,24,28 and 29 and await certificate of service from the High Court with regard to respondent no.33. Reminder be issued.

-4- Item No.3 C.A.NO.3665/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing application for deletion of the name of respondent no.7. Opportunity to file counter affidavit to respondent nos. 1 to 4 has already been declined. C.A.NO.5006/2014 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filing application for substitution of respondent nos. 7,8,20,23,25,27,44,115,120,138,140 and 141. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no.6 within four weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 The ld. Counsel, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing on behalf of Ms Usha Nandini V submits that the erstwhile ld. Counsel for the petitioner in this case has expired. He seeks time for filing vakalatnama. Be filed within four weeks time. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 and 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. List again on 10.3.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1323­1344 of 2011 WITH  CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1359 OF 2011, 1456, 1461, 2621, 2738 & 3665 OF 2012 AND 5006 OF 2014 AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © 12004 OF 2014 Union of India & Ors. etc.etc. ... Appellants ­Versus­ M/s Lifestyle International P. Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents OFFICE REPORT  CIVIL APPEAL NO.1323­1344 OF 2011 The office report was listed before Learned Registrar on 23.09.2015 in the matter above mentioned when he was pleased to pass the following order: “ Appellant to provide the fresh address for the sole respondent in C.A. No. 1326, 1334 of 2011, sole respondent in C.A. No. 1329/2011, respondent no. 1 and 2 in C.A. NO. 1335/2011, sole respondent in C.A. No. 1338/2011, both respondents in C.A. Nos. 1339/2011. Be provided within three weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. Sole respondent in C.A.Nos. 1328, 1331 of 2011, both respondent of C.A.No. 1340/2011 are well represented. Service upon the remaining respondents in all the appeals herein is completed but none has entered appearance. List again on 14.12.2015”. It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not furnish the fresh address of the sole respondent in C.A. Nos. 1326,1334, 1338 and 1329 of 2011. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No 1335 of 2011. Both respondents in C.A. No 1339 of 2011 so far. Hence notice could not be issued on the unserved respondents. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1359 OF 2011    ,     1456, 1461, 2621, 2738 & 3665 OF 2012 AND  5006 OF 2014 AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © 12004 OF 2014 The matters above mentioned were listed before Ld. Registrar with office report dated 27.10.2015 when Ld. Registrar passed certain directions (Record proceeding placed with the office report).

Present service position of each matter is as under: CIVIL APPEAL No.1359 of 2011        It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not taken steps on the unserved respondents Nos. 5, 10 and 12 so far. CIVIL APPEAL NO.1456 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not filed spare copy of the appeal on the unserved respondent no. 67 Certificate of service has not been received from the High Court on Respondent no. 54 and 55.  He has not furnished the better particulars on respondent nos. 9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41, 42 so far.  Respondent no. 57 since now deceased, Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed application for substitution.  CIVIL APPEAL No.1461 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent nos. 8, 37 and 38.  He has not filed an application for substitution of the deceased respondent no. 11  so far. Respondent no. 43 is complete but no one has filed Vakalatnama Appearance so far.  C.A. No. 2621 OF 2012  It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent nos. 13, 14, 16, 25­27, 72, 90, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161, 163, 47, 68, 44 102.  He has also not taken steps in accordance with the government O.M. dated August 2011, to effect service on respondent nos. 115­117, 108 and 116 who are residing abroad.  It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 on record. Certificate of service has not been received from the High Court on Respondent Nos. 74 and 75 despite registry's request.

C.A. No. 2738 OF 2012 It is submitted that counsel for the appellant has not furnished fresh address of unserved respondent nos. 5­8, 13, 20, 24, 28 and 29.  It is further submitted that certificate of service has not been received from High Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 33. C.A.No. 3665 OF 2012    It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed Application for deletion of the name of Respondent No.7 from the array of parties so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has not filed counter affidavit so far.  C.A. No. 5006 OF 2014 It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed application for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent nos.7,8,20,23, 25, 27, 44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 on record so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps in respect of respondent no.6. SLP © No.12004/2014 It is submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. It is further submitted that A.D.Card duly siged has been received from the petitioner after receiving notice of alternative arrangement, but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the petitioner so far. It is lastly submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2, through served with notice. The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court. Dated this the 11th day of January, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate 161/52, 3rd Floor, Flat No.8, Jogabai, Jamia Nagar New Delhi­110 025 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section.

3. Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate, 304, 3rd Floor, Somdutt Chamber, 9, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, D­28 (L.G.F.), Jangpura Extn. New Delhi­110 014 5. Mr. Nilofar Qureshi, Advocate                                 G­20, Vardhman City II Plaza, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­110 002 6. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate, Library 2, Supreme Court New Delhi 7.  Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate 55, G.L.Sanghi Block Supreme Court of India, New Delhi        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

/ ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1359/2011 (With C.A. No. 1456/2012 (With C.A. No. 1461/2012 (With C.A. No. 2621/2012 (With C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 12/01/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr Mohan Lal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr Abhishek Anand, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr V Sushant Gupta, Adv.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2016.01.12 Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv.16:58:11 ISTReason: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. -2-Item No.3For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr Darpan Bhuyan, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv.

Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr Ashish Garg,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RCivil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filingthe fresh address for service of sole respondent in C.A Nos.1326, 1334, 1338, 1329 of 2011, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 inC.A No.1335/2011 and both respondents in C.A No.1339/2011.Notices thereafter be issued.C.A.NO.1359/2011 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for takingsteps for service of respondent nos. 5,10 and 12. Noticesthereafter be issued.C.A.NO.1456/2012 Spare copies be filed for respondent No.67 within twoweeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. Await certificate of service from the High Court inrespect of respondent nos. 54 and 55 and opportunity of fourweeks is granted for furnishing the fresh address forrespondent nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41 and 42.Notices thereafterbe issued. -3-Item No.3 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filingapplication for substitution of respondent no.57.C.A.NO.1461/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted forfurnishing fresh complete address of respondent nos. 8,37and 38 and filing application for substitution of respondentno.11. Notices thereafter be issued.C.A.NO.2621/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filingfresh address of respondent nos. 13,14,16,25 to 27, 72,90,117,138,142,147,154,161,163,47,68,44 and 102. Noticesthereafter be issued. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for taking

steps as per Government O.M. No.F.12(77)/10-Judl.dt.18.8.2011 for service of respondent nos. 115 to 117, 108and 116. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for takingsteps for substitution of legal representatives of deceasedrespondent nos. 15,73,88,89,98,134,137,139,141,145,152,153. Await certificate of service from the High Court withregard to respondent nos. 74 and 75.C.A.NO.2738/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted forfurnishing fresh address of respondent nos.5-8, 13,20-,24,28and 29 and await certificate of service from the High Courtwith regard to respondent no.33. Reminder be issued. -4-Item No.3C.A.NO.3665/2012 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filingapplication for deletion of the name of respondent no.7. Opportunity to file counter affidavit to respondentnos. 1 to 4 has already been declined.C.A.NO.5006/2014 Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for filingapplication for substitution of respondent nos.7,8,20,23,25,27,44,115,120,138,140 and 141. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted for takingfresh steps for effecting service on respondent no.6 withinfour weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued.SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 The ld. Counsel, Mr Siddharth Mittal appearing onbehalf of Ms Usha Nandini V submits that the erstwhile ld.Counsel for the petitioner in this case has expired. Heseeks time for filing vakalatnama. Be filed within fourweeks time. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 and 3 to file counteraffidavit has already been declined.

None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service. List again on 10.3.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

1 ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.8 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).2328/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No. 19221/2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4133/2011 SLP(C) No. 15438-15439/2011 SLP(C) No. 20685/2011 (With Office Report) Date : 11/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Mrs. S. Mullick, Adv. Mr. Sebat Kumar Deuria, adv. Mrs. Minakshi Midha, Adv. Mr. Niraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Das, Adv. Mr. Ashwin Reddy, Adv. Mr. Vijay K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR

2 For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted in all SLPs. Tag with Civil Appeal No.1361 of 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner in SLP(C) Nos. 15438-15439/2011 says that he would like to move an application for withdrawal of his vakalatnama. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

\212 1 ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.8 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).2328/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No. 19221/2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4133/2011 SLP(C) No. 15438-15439/2011 SLP(C) No. 20685/2011 (With Office Report) Date : 11/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick, AOR Mrs. S. Mullick, Adv. Mr. Sebat Kumar Deuria, adv. Mrs. Minakshi Midha, Adv. Mr. Niraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AORSignature Not Verified Mr. Bhaskar Das, Adv.Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2016.01.11 Mr. Ashwin Reddy, Adv.16:57:42 ISTReason: Mr. Vijay K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR 2For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR

Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted in all SLPs. Tag with Civil Appeal No.1361 of 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner in SLP(C) Nos. 15438-15439/2011 says that he would like to move an application for withdrawal of his vakalatnama. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2328/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No. 19221/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH SLP(C) Nos. 4133/2011 and 15438-15439/2011 SLP(C) No. 20685/2011 (With Office Report) Date : 04/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Ms. Swati Vaibhav,Adv. For Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Vijay K.Singh,Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Sanyat Lodha,Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. 1

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters before a Bench of which one of us (Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.) is not a member. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

X ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2328/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No. 19221/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH SLP(C) Nos. 4133/2011 and 15438-15439/2011 SLP(C) No. 20685/2011 (With Office Report) Date : 04/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Ms. Swati Vaibhav,Adv. For Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Vijay K.Singh,Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Sanyat Lodha,Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySarita PurohitDate: 2015.12.0513:16:22 ISTReason: 1 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters before a Bench of which one of us(Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.) is not a member. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra)

Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

ITEM NO.87 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No. 2740/2012 P.C.JEWELLER LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 02/12/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. Aditya K. Dubey,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Certificate of service has been received from the High Court in respect of all nine respondents but none has entered their appearance. Except, Mr. Aditya K. Dubey has appeared on behalf of Union of India, respondent no. 1 and 2, vakalatnama be filed in four weeks. The ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed the Statement of Case. Th ereafter, process the matter to be listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

° ITEM NO.87 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No. 2740/2012 P.C.JEWELLER LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 02/12/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. Aditya K. Dubey,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Certificate of service has been received from the High Court in respect of all nine respondents but none has entered their appearance. Except, Mr. Aditya K. Dubey has appeared on behalf of Union of India, respondent no. 1 and 2, vakalatnama be filed in four weeks. The ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed the Statement of Case. Thereafter, process the matter to be listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.12.0513:06:29 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.9 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 7/2013 in Civil Appeal No(s). 8390/2011 M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &ORS Respondent(s) (for impleadment) Date : 23/11/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice to the proposed impleading party, returnable within four weeks. (VINOD KUMAR) COURT MASTER (RAMESH CHAND SHARMA) COURT MASTER

SECTION – III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION        INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 7 (Application for Impleadment) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8390  OF  2011 M/s. Retailers Association of India                                                         ........Appellant ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors.                                                                 ........Respondent OFFICE REPORT  It is submitted that Mr. E.C. Agarwala, Advocate has on 10 th July, 2013 filed an application for impleadment praying therein that the applicant M/s. Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited may be impleaded as appellant in the said Civil Appeal . The said application has been registered as I.A. No. 7 of 2013. Copy of the application is placed with the main paper books. The application above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber with this office report.  Dated this the 21 st  day of November, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR         Copy to:­ 1. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate     48 lawyers Chamber. 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad,  Advocate     Central Agency Section  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR         C­I

F ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.9 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 7/2013 in Civil Appeal No(s). 8390/2011 M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &ORS Respondent(s) (for impleadment) Date : 23/11/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice to the proposed impleading party, returnable within four weeks. (VINOD KUMAR) (RAMESH CHAND SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVinod KumarDate: 2015.11.2317:18:15 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1359/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1456/2012 (With C.A. No. 1461/2012 (With C.A. No. 2621/2012 (With C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 28/10/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr Mohan Lal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr Siddharth Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. Mr Gulshan Chawala, Adv. Dr Kailash Chand, Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv.

-2- Item No.6 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A.NO.1359/2011 Among 14 respondents herein, service upon respondent nos. 1 to 4, 6 to 9, 11,13,14 is complete but none has entered appearance. For the remaining respondents, ld. Counsel for the appellant still to take steps to effect service. Be taken within four weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.1456/2012 Spare copies of the appeal have not been provided for issuance of notice qua respondent no.67. Be provided within one weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. Certificate of service with respect to respondent nos. 54 and 55 is still awaited from the respective High Court despite reminder. Let fresh reminder be issued. For respondent nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41 and 42, ld. Counsel for the appellant has still to furnish the better particulars and for deceased respondent no.57, steps to substitute his legal representatives are yet to be taken. Appropriate steps be taken within two weeks time. Notices accordingly be issued. C.A.NO.1461/2012 Appellant has yet to provide the fresh address of respondent nos. 8,37 and 38 and has to take steps to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.11. Notices accordingly be issued.

-3- Item No.6 Service upon respondent no.43 is complete but none has entered appearance. C.A.NO.2621/2012 Appellant has to take steps in accordance to the Government O.M. of August, 2011 to effect service on respondent nos. 108, and 115 to 117 and furnish the correct address of respondent nos. 13,14,16,25 to 27, 72,90,117,138,142,147,154,161,163,47,68,44 and 102. Steps in respect of legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 15,73,88,89,98,134,137,139,141,145,152,153 are also to be taken by the appellant. Appropriate steps be taken within three weeks time. Reminder be issued to the concerned High Court qua the certificate of service qua respondent nos. 74 and 75. C.A.NO.2738/2012 Certificate of service in respect of respondent nO.33 is still awaited. Appellant has still to furnish the better particulars of respondent nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28,29. Be furnished within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.3665/2012 Application for deleting name of respondent no.7 from the array of parties as was assured has not been filed. Appellant to take appropriate steps. Opportunity for respondent nos. 1 to 4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

-4- Item No.6 C.A.NO.5006/2014 Legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 7,8,20,23,25,27,44,115,120,138,140,141 are yet to be taken by the appellant. Appropriate application be filed in two weeks time and processed thereafter as per rules. SLP(C) NO.12004/2014 Respondent nos. 1 and 3 have failed to file counter affidavit despite being served with the warning of last opportunity. Further opportunity is therefore declined. Service upon respondent no.2 is complete but none has entered appearance. List again on 12.1.2016. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

üNo data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.

ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 23/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr Ajay Amrit Raj, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appellant to provide the fresh address for the sole respondent in C.A.NO.1326, 1334 OF 2011, sole respondent in C.A.NO.1329/2011, respondent nos 1 and 2 in C.A.NO.1335/2011, sole respondent in C.A.NO.1338/2011, both respondents in C.A.NO.1339/2011. Be provided within three weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. Sole respondent of C.A.NOS.1328, 1331 OF 2011, both respondent of C.A.NO.1340/2011 are well represented. Service upon the remaining respondents in all the appeals herein is completed but none has entered appearance. List again on 14.12.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.94 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 8878/2011 HOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 23/09/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the ten respondents have been served, except that the name of respondent No.7 has been deleted from the array of the parties. None of the parties have filed the statement of case. Since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and in that circumstance, the List of dates already submitted is presumed to have been accepted by the parties. The appeal stands complete, in the given circumstances. Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1323­1344 of 2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                             .....Appellants ­Versus­ LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ORS... ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT  It is submitted that there are 30 respondents.  Mr. Chirag M Shroff, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1328 of 2011, Mr. O.P. Khaithan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1331 of 2011 and Mr. Sanjan Jain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of both the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1340 of 2011. A.D. Card duly signed & stamped has been received on behalf of both the respondents in Civil Appeal No 1323 of 2011 and 1341 of 2011.  A.D. Card duly signed & stamped has been received on Sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1324, 1325, 1327, 1330, 1332, 1333, 1342, 1343 and 1344 of 2011,  But no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents.  Certificate of Service has been received from the High Court which shows that notice has been served on respondent No. 1 & 2 in Civil Appeal No. 1336 and 1337 of 2011. Service of Notice is complete on the said respondents. It is further submitted that certificate of service has been received from the High Court on the unserved respondents as per details given below:   Respondent No. / C.A.No. Remarks Sole Respondent in 1326 and  1334 of 2011 (Common respondents) Buliding premises under renovation   Sole Respondent in 1329 of 2011 Company shifted Respondent No.1 in 1335 of 2011 Incomplete Address Respondent No.2 in 1335 of 2011 ­do­ Sole Respondent in 1338 of 2011 Company does not exist  Respondent No. 1 & 2 in 1339 of 2011 Restaurent does not exist  and does not reside here    It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken appropriate steps with regard to Service of notice on unserved respondents so far despite registry's request. The office report is listed before Ld. Registrar for orders. Dated this the this the 22nd day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

­2­ Copy to: 1 Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section 2. M/s O.P. Khaitan & Co., Advocate B­1 Defence Colony, New Delhi­110 024 3. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocates 95, Lawyers chambers 4. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate Chamber No. 92          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C­2

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8878 OF 2011 Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd.                                                               ...Appellant ­VERSUS­ Union of India & Ors.                                                                                 ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT FOR PRE­FINAL HEARING It is submitted that there are 10 respondents Service of notice of lodgment of petition of Appeal is complete as Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and certificate of service has been received from High Court on behalf of respondent No. 5, 6 and 8 to 10 which shows that notice have been served on the said respondents.  Respondent No. 7 has been deleted vide court's Order dated 25 th  August, 2015 from the array of the parties. It is further submitted that counsel for both the parites have not filed statement of case despite this Registry's notice.  Time to file statement of case has already expired as per amended rules.  The appeal is ready for hearing. The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court  for orders. Dated this the 16 th  day of  September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48, Lawyers Chambers. 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section.       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  c3

ª ITEM NO.94 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 8878/2011 HOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 23/09/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the ten respondents have been served, except that the name of respondent No.7 has been deleted from the array of the parties. None of the parties have filed the statement of case. Since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and in that circumstance, the List of dates already submitted is presumed to have been accepted by the parties. The appeal stands complete, in the given circumstances.Signature Not Verified Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.09.2917:49:00 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

v ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1323-1344/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD.&ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 23/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr Ajay Amrit Raj, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. M/s. O. P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appellant to provide the fresh address for the sole respondent in C.A.NO.1326, 1334 OF 2011, sole respondent in C.A.NO.1329/2011, respondent nos 1 and 2 in C.A.NO.1335/2011, sole respondent in C.A.NO.1338/2011, both respondents in C.A.NO.1339/2011. Be provided within three weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. Sole respondent of C.A.NOS.1328, 1331 OF 2011, both respondent of C.A.NO.1340/2011 are well represented. Service upon the remaining respondents in all the appeals herein is completed but none has entered appearance.Signature Not Verified List again on 14.12.2015.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.09.2917:15:33 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for deleting the name of Respondent No. 7) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8878 OF 2011 Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd.              ........Appellant           ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors.                            ........Respondent OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate has on 1 st December, 2014 filed an application for deleting the name of respondent No. 7 i.e. Renu Construction Pvt. Ltd. from the array of the parties and said application has been registered as I.A. No. 3.         The application is listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders. Dated this the 27 th  Day of January, 2015.                                                                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :­ 1. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate     48, Lawyers Chamber. 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate     Central Agency Section.                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C­I

ê ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 8878/2011 HOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondent) Date : 25/08/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R An application has been filed seeking deletion of the name of the respondent no.7 from the array of the parties. There is no opposition. The application is allowed. The name of the respondent no.7 is deleted from the array of the parties at the risk and responsibility of the petitioner. Amended cause title be filed within two weeks. (SWETA DHYANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) Sr. P.A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.08.2616:50:08 ISTReason:

SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1456 of 2012 WITH  CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2621, 2738 & 3665 OF 2012 AND 5006 OF 2014 AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION © 12004 OF 2014 Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. & Ors etc.etc. ... Appellants . Versus­ Union of India & Ors. etc. etc. .. Respondents OFFICE REPORT  The matters above mentioned were listed before Ld. Registrar on 17.4.2015, when  the following order was passed : C.A. No. 1456/2012 “Spare copies of the petition of appeal have not been filed for issuance of notice to respondent no. 67.  Be filed within two weeks. Certificate of service from the concerned High Court with respect to respondent nos. 54 and 55 is still awaited. Appellant has also to furnish the better particulars of respondent Nos.  9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41, 42.  Be furnished within two weeks and notices thereafter be issued. Appellant also to take steps to substitute the legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 57.  C.A.No.2621/2012 Appellant has to furnish the fresh address of respondent nos. 13, 14, 16, 25 to 27, 72, 90, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161,163, 47, 68, 44, 102 and has also to take steps to effect service on respondent nos. 115 to 117 and also on respondent of Govt. O.M. No. 12(77)/10­Judi. dt. 18.8.2011. Steps for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 have also not been taken.  Petitioner to do the needful  within three weeks and notices thereafter be issued and application be processed accordingly. C.A. No. 2738/2012 Letter has been received from the Civil Judge (Sr. Div), Gurgaon about the report that notice has been served on respondent no. 33. Certificate of service is yet to be received from the High Court. Appellant has to furnish the better particulars of respondent

nos. 5 to 8, 13, 20, 24, 28 and 29.  Be furnished within three weeks. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No. 3665/2012 Application for deleting name of respondent no. 7 is still awaited. Be filed within three weeks and be processed as per rules. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 has not come on record despite warning of last opportunity. Further opportunity is hereby declined. List again on 27.7.2015.”    CIVIL APPEAL NO.1456 OF 2012 It is submitted that Spare copies of the petition of appeal have not been filed for issuance of notice to respondent no. 67.  Certificate of service in respect of Respondent Nos.54 and 55 is still awaited from the High Court. Counsel for the Appellant has yet not furnished better particulars of Respondent Nos.9, 17, 18, 51, 60, 41 and 42.  He has also not filed Application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.57. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2621 OF 2012 It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has neither furnished the fresh addresses of Respondent Nos.13, 14, 16, 25 to 27, 72, 90, 117, 138, 142, 147, 154, 161, 163, 47, 68, 44, 102 nor he has not taken steps to effect service on respondent nos.115 to 117 as also on respondent nos.108 and 116 who are residing abroad. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos.15, 73, 88, 89, 98, 134, 137, 139, 141, 145, 152 and 153 on record. Certificate of Service in respect of Respondent Nos.64 and 99 has been received from the High Court.  Certificate of Service in respect of Respondent Nos.74 and 75 is still awaited. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2738 of 2012 It is submitted that Certificate of Service in respect of Respondent No.33 is still awaited from the High Court. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not furnished better particulars of respondent Nos.5 to 8, 13, 20, 24, 28 and 29 so far.

CIVIL APPEAL NO.3665 OF 2012 It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has not filed Application for deletion of the name of Respondent No.7 so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 has not filed counter affidavit so far. CIVIL APPEAL NO.5006 OF 2014 The matter was listed before Hon'ble Court on 28 th  April, 2014, when the following order was passed: “Delay condoned.  Leave granted.  Tag with Civil Appeal No.8390 of 2011.” It is submitted that notice of lodgment of petition of appeal was issued to all the 146 respondents through High Court of Andhra Pradesh on 13 th  October, 2014.  High Court, vide letter dated 7 th  February, 2015 informed that service of notice is complete on all the above 146 respondents.  It has been further informed by the High Court that Respondent No.6 is non­resident and notice has been served on his father­in­law.  Further Respondent Nos.7, 8, 20, 23, 25, 27, 44, 115, 120, 138, 140 and 141 have since been expired and notices have been served upon their son/grand son/wife of the deceased respondents. Accordingly, letter to counsel for the appellant was issued on 17.2.2015 to take necessary steps in respect of deceased respondents but no action has been taken so far. It is further submtted that Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate who filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.1­3 has also on 29.1.2015 filed counter affidavit. Vakalatnama/Appearance has not been filed on behalf of remaining served respondents. SLP © NO.12004 OF 2014 The matter was listed before Hon'ble Court on 8 th  May, 2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “ Issue Notice.   Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8878 of 2011.” Accordingly Show Cause notice was issued on 19 th  June, 2014 to all the three respondents by Registered A.D. Post. Mr. B. K. Prasad, Advocate has on 25 th  August, 2014 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 but has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. A.D. Card duly signed has been received back from Respondent No. 2 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said Respondent No.

2 so far. Service of notice is complete. It is further submitted that Mr. S. K. Sabharwal, Advocate for the petitioner has since been expired, Notice of alternative arrangement was issued on 25 th  July 2015 to petitioner by Registered A.D. Post  and his response is awaited. The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court. Dated this the 18th day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate 161/52, 3rd Floor, Flat No.8, Jogabai, Jamia Nagar New Delhi­110 025 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section. 3. Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate, 304, 3rd Floor, Somdutt Chamber, 9, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, D­28 (L.G.F.), Jangpura Extn. New Delhi­110 014 5. Mr. Nilofar Qureshi, Advocate                                 G­20, Vardhman City II Plaza, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­110 002 6. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate, Library 2, Supreme Court New Delhi 7.  Mr. Rabin Majumdar, Advocate 55, G.L.Sanghi Block Supreme Court of India, New Delhi                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Þ1 ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1461/2012 (With C.A. No. 2621/2012 (With C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 5006/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12004/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 20/08/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Ms Sanya Talwar, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. Mr Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Kavita Rawat, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.08.26 Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv.16:54:24 ISTReason: Ms Sunita Gautam, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. -2-Item No.6 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.1456/2012

Respondent no.67 is not yet served for want of sparecopies of the petition. Be provided within one weeks time.Notice thereafter be issued. Certificate of service qua respondent nos. 54 and 55 isstill awaited from the High Court concerned. Fresh reminderbe issued. Better particulars of respondent nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41and 42 have not been provided by the appellant. Be providedwithin two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. Respondent no.57 since now deceased, ld. counsel forthe appellant to file an application to substitute the legalrepresentatives. C.A. No.2621/2012 Appellant has not furnished the fresh and correctaddress of respondent Nos.13,14,16,25 to 27,72,90,117,138,142,147,154,161,163,47,68,44 and 102. Beprovided within two weeks time. With respect to respondent nos. 115 to 117 and 108,since they are reported to be residing abroad, ld. Counselfor the appellant to take steps in accordance of theGovernment O.M. dt.August, 2011. With respect to deceased respondent nos.15,73,88,89,90,134,137,139,141,145,152,153 application to -3-Item No.6substitute the legal representatives is still awaited. Ld.Counsel for the appellant to file the same within two weekstime. Service upon respondent nos. 64 and 99 is complete butnone has entered appearance. Service report for respondent Nos. 74 and 75 is stillawaited from the High Court. Fresh reminder be issued. C.A. No.2738/2012 Service report in respect of respondent no.33 isawaited from the High Court. Fresh reminder be issued.

Better particulars of respondent nos. 5 to 8,13,20,24,28 and 29 are yet to be furnished by the ld.Counsel for the appellant. Be furnished within two weekstime. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A. No.3665/2012 Application for deleting the name of respondent no.7from the array parties has not been filed despite it was soundertaken. Be filed within two weeks and be processedthereafter as per rules. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counteraffidavit. Their opportunity already stands declined by theprevious order of 17.4.2015. C.A. No.5006/2014 Application to substitute the legal representatives ofdeceased respondent nos. 7,8,20,23,25,27,44,115,120, 138,140and 141 is yet to be filed. Be filed within two weeks time. -4-Item No.6 For respondent no.6, ld. Counsel for the appellant hasyet to take fresh steps. Be taken within four weeks time.Notice thereafter be issued. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counteraffidavit. SLP(C) No.12004/2014 Counter affidavit of respondent nos. 1 and 3 isawaited. Be filed within four weeks time as lastopportunity. Service of respondent no.2 is complete but none hasentered appearance. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner since now hasexpired, notice of alternative arrangement has already beenissued. Service thereof is sill awaited. Registry to report the status of the remainingrespondents in all the appeals herein.C.A.NO.1461/2012

Though also listed but office report is not specifyingthe status of the said appeal. The ld. Counsel however hasmentioned that process fee has already been deposited.Registry to verify and to do the needful accordingly. List again on 28.10.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1461/2012 M/S. NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 15/05/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the appellant has requested some more time to take fresh steps. Fresh address of respondent nos. 8,37 and 38 be provided. Steps for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.11 be taken. Service of respondent No.43 is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued for the purpose. List again on 20.8.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

SECTION-III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1461 of 2012 M/s. NIIT Limited .....Appellant -Versus- Union of India & Ors. ....Respondents OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that there are 50 respondents. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are represented through Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate. Respondent No.4 is represented through Ms. Asha G.Nair, Advocate. As per of Certificate of Service received from the High Court, service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on rest of the respondents except on the following respondents for the reasons mentioned against them: Respondent No. Remarks 8, 43 Door of the said premises was found locked 11 Expired 38 She has gone out of station 37 Not found at given address Accordingly, Mr. Pradeep K.Bakshi, Counsel for the appellant, was requested vide this Registry's letters dated 20.11.2014, 5.1.2015 and 26.3.2015 to take appropriate steps for service of notice to the above respondents, but he has only forwarded fresh address of Respondent No.43. Accordingly Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal was issued to the said respondent through High Court of Bombay on 29.4.2015. Service Report for the same is awaited. Counsel for the appellant has not taken any steps in respect of Respondent Nos.8, 11, 37 and 38. The Office Report is listed before Ld. Registrar for orders. Dated this the this the 8th day of May, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1 Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, Advocate, A-4, Defence Colonly New Delhi-110 024 2. Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section 3. Ms. Asha G.Nair, Advocate, Govt. of Maharashtra Sadan, Copernicus Marg New Delhi-110 001 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C-2

\236 ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1461/2012 M/S. NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 15/05/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the appellant has requested some more time to take fresh steps. Fresh address of respondent nos. 8,37 and 38 be provided. Steps for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.11 be taken. Service of respondent No.43 is awaited from the concerned High Court. Reminder be issued for the purpose.Signature Not Verified List again on 20.8.2015.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.05.1910:18:03 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A.NO. 2621/2012 Date : 17/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr M.P.Devanath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr Shivaji M Jadhav, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr Abhishek Baid, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A.NO.1456/2012 Spare copies of the petition of appeal have not been filed for issuance of notice to respondent no.67. Be filed within two weeks.

-2- Item No.9 Certificate of service from the concerned High Court with respect to respondent nos. 54 and 55 is still awaited. Appellant has also to furnish the better particulars of respondent Nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41,42. Be furnished within two weeks and notices thereafter be issued. Appellant also to take steps to substitute the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.57. C.A.NO.2621/2012 Appellant has to furnish the fresh address of respondent nos. 13,14,16,25 to 27, 72, 90,117, 138,142, 147,154,161,163,47,68,44,102 and has also to take steps to effect service on respondent nos. 115 to 117 and also on respondent No.108 and 116 who are residing abroad in compliance of Govt. O.M.No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011. Steps for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos.15,73,88,89,98,134,137,139, 141,145,152 and 153 have also not been taken. Petitioner to do the needful within three weeks and notices thereafter be issued and application be processed accordingly. C.A.NO.2738/2012 Letter has been received from the Civil Judge(Sr.Div), Gurgaon about the report that notice has been served on respondent no.33. Certificate of service is yet to be received from the High Court.

-3- Item No.9 Appellant has to furnish the better particulars of respondent nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29. Be furnished within three weeks. Notices thereafter be issued. C.A.NO.3665/2012 Application for deleting name of respondent no.7 is still awaited. Be filed within three weeks and be processed as per rules. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 has not come on record despite warning of last opportunity. Further opportunity is hereby declined. List again on 27.7.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

Æ ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A.NO. 2621/2012 Date : 17/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr M.P.Devanath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr Shivaji M Jadhav, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr Abhishek Baid, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A.NO.1456/2012Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.04.2117:07:05 ISTReason: Spare copies of the petition of appeal have not been filed for issuance of notice to respondent no.67. Be filed within two weeks. -2-Item No.9 Certificate of service from the concerned High Courtwith respect to respondent nos. 54 and 55 is still awaited. Appellant has also to furnish the better particulars

of respondent Nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41,42. Be furnished withintwo weeks and notices thereafter be issued. Appellant also to take steps to substitute the legalrepresentatives of deceased respondent no.57.C.A.NO.2621/2012 Appellant has to furnish the fresh address ofrespondent nos. 13,14,16,25 to 27, 72, 90,117, 138,142,147,154,161,163,47,68,44,102 and has also to take steps toeffect service on respondent nos. 115 to 117 and also onrespondent No.108 and 116 who are residing abroad incompliance of Govt. O.M.No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011. Steps for substituting the legal representatives ofdeceased respondent nos.15,73,88,89,98,134,137,139,141,145,152 and 153 have also not been taken. Petitioner todo the needful within three weeks and notices thereafter beissued and application be processed accordingly.C.A.NO.2738/2012 Letter has been received from the Civil Judge(Sr.Div),Gurgaon about the report that notice has been served onrespondent no.33. Certificate of service is yet to bereceived from the High Court. -3-Item No.9 Appellant has to furnish the better particulars ofrespondent nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29. Be furnishedwithin three weeks. Notices thereafter be issued.C.A.NO.3665/2012 Application for deleting name of respondent no.7 isstill awaited. Be filed within three weeks and be processedas per rules. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4has not come on record despite warning of last opportunity.Further opportunity is hereby declined. List again on 27.7.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarÆ ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A.NO. 2621/2012 Date : 17/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr M.P.Devanath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Ashish Garg, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr Shivaji M Jadhav, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr Abhishek Baid, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A.NO.1456/2012Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.04.2117:07:05 ISTReason: Spare copies of the petition of appeal have not been filed for issuance of notice to respondent no.67. Be filed within two weeks. -2-Item No.9 Certificate of service from the concerned High Court

with respect to respondent nos. 54 and 55 is still awaited. Appellant has also to furnish the better particularsof respondent Nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41,42. Be furnished withintwo weeks and notices thereafter be issued. Appellant also to take steps to substitute the legalrepresentatives of deceased respondent no.57.C.A.NO.2621/2012 Appellant has to furnish the fresh address ofrespondent nos. 13,14,16,25 to 27, 72, 90,117, 138,142,147,154,161,163,47,68,44,102 and has also to take steps toeffect service on respondent nos. 115 to 117 and also onrespondent No.108 and 116 who are residing abroad incompliance of Govt. O.M.No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011. Steps for substituting the legal representatives ofdeceased respondent nos.15,73,88,89,98,134,137,139,141,145,152 and 153 have also not been taken. Petitioner todo the needful within three weeks and notices thereafter beissued and application be processed accordingly.C.A.NO.2738/2012 Letter has been received from the Civil Judge(Sr.Div),Gurgaon about the report that notice has been served onrespondent no.33. Certificate of service is yet to bereceived from the High Court. -3-Item No.9 Appellant has to furnish the better particulars ofrespondent nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29. Be furnishedwithin three weeks. Notices thereafter be issued.C.A.NO.3665/2012 Application for deleting name of respondent no.7 isstill awaited. Be filed within three weeks and be processedas per rules. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4has not come on record despite warning of last opportunity.Further opportunity is hereby declined.

List again on 27.7.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.106 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1347/2011 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S FLAMINGO DUTY SHOPS PVT.LTD & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1360/2011 (With Office Report for Direction) C.A. No. 1361/2011 (With Office Report for Direction) C.A. No. 9022/2011 (With Office Report for Direction) C.A. No. 9029/2011 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 216/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 300/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 846/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2193/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3165/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3167/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3172/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3305/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3359/2012 (With Office Report)

Item No.106 -2- Date : 01/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. A.K. Kaul, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Saman Ansari, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Karma Dorjee, Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. Ketan Paul, Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Jain, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. M/s Suresh A. Shroff & Co.,Adv. Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh,Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In C.A.No.846/2012, the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Avinash Kumar has appeared for respondent No.5. Vakalatnama be filed within the stipulated time period. Registry to take the same on record. In C.A. No.9022/2011, the Ld. Advocate, Mr. A.K. Kaul, appearing on behalf of Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate-on-Record has appeared for the respondent – Union of India. Vakalatnama be filed within the stipulated time period. Registry to take the same on record.

Item No.106 -3- In C.A. No.1360/2011, appellant as well as respondent Nos.1 and 2 have filed the statement of case. In C.A. Nos.216, 300, 846, 2193, 3165, 3167, 3172, 3305, 3359/2012 and 9029/2011, none of parties has filed the statement of case. In C.A. Nos.1347, 1361 and 9022/2011, appellant has filed the statement of case but the respondents have failed to file the same. In all the above-said matters, since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and in that circumstance, the List of dates already submitted is presumed to have been accepted by the parties. All the appeals stand complete, in the given circumstances. Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

Ö ITEM NO.106 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1347/2011 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S FLAMINGO DUTY SHOPS PVT.LTD & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1360/2011 (With Office Report for Direction) C.A. No. 1361/2011 (With Office Report for Direction) C.A. No. 9022/2011 (With Office Report for Direction) C.A. No. 9029/2011 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 216/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 300/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 846/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2193/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3165/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3167/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3172/2012 (With Office Report)Signature Not Verified C.A. No. 3305/2012Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.04.10 (With Office Report)10:40:31 ISTReason: C.A. No. 3359/2012 (With Office Report)Item No.106 -2-Date : 01/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s) Mr. A.K. Kaul, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Saman Ansari, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Karma Dorjee, Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. Ketan Paul, Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Jain, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. M/s Suresh A. Shroff & Co.,Adv. Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh,Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In C.A.No.846/2012, the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Avinash Kumarhas appeared for respondent No.5. Vakalatnama be filed withinthe stipulated time period. Registry to take the same onrecord. In C.A. No.9022/2011, the Ld. Advocate, Mr. A.K. Kaul,appearing on behalf of Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate-on-Record hasappeared for the respondent - Union of India. Vakalatnama befiled within the stipulated time period. Registry to take thesame on record.Item No.106 -3- In C.A. No.1360/2011, appellant as well as respondentNos.1 and 2 have filed the statement of case. In C.A. Nos.216, 300, 846, 2193, 3165, 3167, 3172, 3305,3359/2012 and 9029/2011, none of parties has filed thestatement of case. In C.A. Nos.1347, 1361 and 9022/2011, appellant has filedthe statement of case but the respondents have failed to filethe same.

In all the above-said matters, since it is no more amandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013and in that circumstance, the List of dates already submittedis presumed to have been accepted by the parties. All the appeals stand complete, in the givencircumstances. Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'bleCourt, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012 Date : 25/02/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Tushar Roy, Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr M.P.Devanath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr S.K.Bandyopadhyay, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr Shivaji M Jadhav, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Ms Rita gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012 Appellant has not filed spare copies to effect service on respondent No.67. Be filed at the earliest.

-2- Item No.16 Service report from the respective High Court is awaited with respect to respondent Nos. 54,55. Reminder be issued. Service of respondent nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41 and 42 is received as unserved. Appellant to furnish the better particulars. With respect to respondent no.57 it is reported that he has expired. Appellant to take steps to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased. Service of respondent nos. 5 to 8, 10 to 15, 19 to 40, 43 to 50,53,58,59,61 to 66, 68 is complete but none has entered appearance. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 have already filed statement of case. C.A.NO.2621/2012 Service with respect to respondent Nos. 1 to 12, 17 to 24,28 to 43, 45,46,48 to 63, 65 to 67, 69 to 71, 76 to 87, 91,93 to 97, 100, 101, 103 to 107, 109 to 114, 118 to 133, 135, 136, 140, 143, 144,146,148 to 151, 155 to 160 and 162 is complete but none has entered appearance. Appellant to furnish the fresh address of respondent nos. 13,14,16,27,72,90,138,142,154,47, 68, 44,102 also the better particulars of respondent nos. 25,26,117,147,161, 163 need to be furnished by the appellant. Appropriate steps have to be taken by the appellant to effect service on respondent Nos. 115 and 117.

-3- Item No.16 Appellant to take steps to effect service on respondent Nos. 108 and 116 as per Govt. O.M. No.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011. Respondent Nos. 15, 73,88,89,98,134,137,139,141,145,152 and 153 are reported to have expired. Appellant to take steps to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased respondents. C.A.NO.2738/2012 Service of respondent no.33 is awaited from the respective High Court. Reminder be issued. Appellant to furnish the better particulars of respondent Nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29. C.A.NO.3665/2012 Appellant has not filed application for deletion of name of respondent no.7. Be filed within two weeks as last opportunity. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks as last opportunity. List again on 17.4.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

¼# ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012 COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2621/2012 Date : 25/02/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Tushar Roy, Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr M.P.Devanath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr S.K.Bandyopadhyay, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mrs Rani Chhabra,Adv. Mr Shivaji M Jadhav, Adv. Mr E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Ms Rita gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingSignature Not Verified O R D E R Civil Appeal No(s). 1456/2012Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.02.2813:41:31 ISTReason: Appellant has not filed spare copies to effect service on respondent No.67. Be filed at the earliest. -2-Item No.16 Service report from the respective High Court is awaitedwith respect to respondent Nos. 54,55. Reminder be issued. Service of respondent nos. 9,17,18,51,60,41 and 42 is

received as unserved. Appellant to furnish the betterparticulars. With respect to respondent no.57 it is reported that hehas expired. Appellant to take steps to substitute the legalrepresentatives of the deceased. Service of respondent nos. 5 to 8, 10 to 15, 19 to 40,43 to 50,53,58,59,61 to 66, 68 is complete but none hasentered appearance. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 have already filed statement ofcase.C.A.NO.2621/2012 Service with respect to respondent Nos. 1 to 12, 17 to24,28 to 43, 45,46,48 to 63, 65 to 67, 69 to 71, 76 to 87,91,93 to 97, 100, 101, 103 to 107, 109 to 114, 118 to 133,135, 136, 140, 143, 144,146,148 to 151, 155 to 160 and 162 iscomplete but none has entered appearance. Appellant to furnish the fresh address of respondentnos. 13,14,16,27,72,90,138,142,154,47, 68, 44,102 also thebetter particulars of respondent nos. 25,26,117,147,161, 163need to be furnished by the appellant. Appropriate steps have to be taken by the appellant toeffect service on respondent Nos. 115 and 117. -3-Item No.16 Appellant to take steps to effect service on respondentNos. 108 and 116 as per Govt. O.M. No.12(77)/10-Judl.dt.18.8.2011. Respondent Nos. 15, 73,88,89,98,134,137,139,141,145,152and 153 are reported to have expired. Appellant to take stepsto substitute the legal representatives of the deceasedrespondents.C.A.NO.2738/2012 Service of respondent no.33 is awaited from therespective High Court. Reminder be issued. Appellant to furnish the better particulars of

respondent Nos. 5 to 8, 13,20,24,28 and 29.C.A.NO.3665/2012 Appellant has not filed application for deletion of nameof respondent no.7. Be filed within two weeks as lastopportunity. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not filed counter affidavit.Be filed within four weeks as last opportunity. List again on 17.4.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2740/2012 P.C.JEWELLER LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 23/02/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Niraj Singh,Adv. Mr. A.Mullick,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Finally, at a specific request, a week's time is granted for furnishing complete address of respondent nos. 3 and 4. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER

p ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2740/2012 P.C.JEWELLER LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 23/02/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Niraj Singh,Adv. Mr. A.Mullick,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Finally, at a specific request, a week's time is granted for furnishing complete address of respondent nos. 3 and 4. (SUMAN WADHWA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2015.02.2414:14:30 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 27/01/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Ragini Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though the Ld. Counsel was earlier given opportunity to furnish fresh and complete address in respect of respondent nos. 5 and 8, however, the ld. Counsel for the appellant suggests that the permission to serve notice upon the unserved respondents may be effected by dasti. Permission as sought for is granted. Receive the dasti notices from the registry within one week and effecting service upon the unserved respondents within four weeks. File proof of service by the date fixed next. List again on 13.3.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

P ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 27/01/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Ragini Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though the Ld. Counsel was earlier given opportunity to furnish fresh and complete address in respect of respondent nos. 5 and 8, however, the ld. Counsel for the appellant suggests that the permission to serve notice upon the unserved respondents may be effected by dasti. Permission as sought for is granted. Receive the dasti notices from the registry within one week and effecting service upon the unserved respondents within four weeks. File proof of service by the date fixed next.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by List again on 13.3.2015.Hema JoshiDate: 2015.01.2916:41:11 ISTReason: (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2193/2012 M/S TACFAB FASHIONS P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 19/01/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. K. Paul, Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Khairati, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has not taken any step for service in respect of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7. One week's time is granted as last opportunity to do the needful, failing which the petition against them shall be deemed to be dismissed without reference to the Court. (VINOD KR.JHA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2193/2012 M/S TACFAB FASHIONS P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 19/01/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. K. Paul, Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Khairati, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has not taken any step for service in respect of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7. One week's time is granted as last opportunity to do the needful, failing which the petition against them shall be deemed to be dismissed without reference to the Court. (VINOD KR.JHA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVinod KumarDate: 2015.01.2413:49:15 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Civil Appeal No(s). 2738/2012 NINETY NINE GEN.RETAIL P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH C.A. No. 2740/2012 (With C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Date : 09/01/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vibhuti Sashant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. Alok Kumar Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No(s). 2738/2012 Service is complete in respect of Respondent Nos. 9 to 12, 14 to 19, 21 to 23, 25 to 27, 30 to 32, 34 & 35 but no one has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 & 17 is at liberty to file the counter affidavit, if any within two weeks. … .2/-

-2- Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps by providing proper address in respect of Respondent Nos. 5 to 8, 13, 20, 24, 28 & 29 within two weeks. In respect of Respondent No. 33, service is awaited from the Hon'ble High Court. Dasti in addition in respect of Respondent No. 33 is permitted. C.A. No. 2740 of 2012 Despite last opportunity granted to ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish full and complete address in respect of Respondent Nos. 3 & 4, the same has not been complied with. List the matter before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions. C.A. No. 3665 of 2012 In respect of Respondent Nos. 5, 6 & 8 to 10, service is complete but no one has entered appearance. In respect of Respondent No. 7, service is incomplete. Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that the Respondent No. 7 is the performa respondent but considering the fact that the respondent is still appearing in the cause title, ld. Counsel may prefer an appropriate application for deletion, if so advised, within two weeks. In respect of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Ld. Counsel is at liberty to file the counter affidavit, if any, within two weeks. Except C.A. NO. 2740 of 2012 rest of the two matters be listed on 23.02.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

D ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Civil Appeal No(s). 2738/2012 NINETY NINE GEN.RETAIL P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH C.A. No. 2740/2012 (With C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Date : 09/01/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vibhuti Sashant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. Alok Kumar Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No(s). 2738/2012 Service is complete in respect of Respondent Nos. 9 to 12, 14 to 19, 21 to 23, 25 to 27, 30 to 32, 34 & 35 but no one has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 & 17 is at liberty to file the counter affidavit, if any withinSignature Not Verified two weeks.Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.01.1317:02:03 ISTReason: ....2/- -2- Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps byproviding proper address in respect of Respondent Nos. 5 to8, 13, 20, 24, 28 & 29 within two weeks. In respect of Respondent No. 33, service is awaitedfrom the Hon'ble High Court. Dasti in addition in respect of Respondent No. 33 ispermitted.C.A. No. 2740 of 2012

Despite last opportunity granted to ld. Counsel for theappellant to furnish full and complete address in respect ofRespondent Nos. 3 & 4, the same has not been complied with. List the matter before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers forfurther directions.C.A. No. 3665 of 2012 In respect of Respondent Nos. 5, 6 & 8 to 10, serviceis complete but no one has entered appearance. In respect of Respondent No. 7, service is incomplete.Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that the Respondent No.7 is the performa respondent but considering the fact thatthe respondent is still appearing in the cause title, ld.Counsel may prefer an appropriate application for deletion,if so advised, within two weeks. In respect of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Ld. Counsel is atliberty to file the counter affidavit, if any, within twoweeks. Except C.A. NO. 2740 of 2012 rest of the two matters belisted on 23.02.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2193/2012 M/S TACFAB FASHIONS P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 11/12/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Khairati, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant is granted three weeks time to comply with the office report dated 12.11.2014 so that service upon the unserved respondent is effected. List after three weeks. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15438-15439/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No. 20720/2010,22/11/2010 in CWP No. 20724/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 08/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Priyanka Rai, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since learned counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit with regard to proof of dasti service in respect of unserved respondent nos. 7 and 12 to 16 so far, the petitions against them are dismissed on this ground. (VINOD KUMAR) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

| ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15438-15439/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No. 20720/2010,22/11/2010 in CWP No. 20724/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 08/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Priyanka Rai, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since learned counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit with regard to proof of dasti service in respect of unserved respondent nos. 7 and 12 to 16 so far, the petitions against them are dismissed on this ground. (VINOD KUMAR) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVinod KumarDate: 2014.12.1311:36:25 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 04/12/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Gurmeet Kaur Kwatra, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite order by the Registrar's Court dt.18.9.2014 counsel for the appellant has not chosen to furnish the fresh and complete address of respondent Nos. 5 and 8 for serving process. As last opportunity, two weeks time is granted. List again on 27.1.2015. (DR. K.ARUL) Registrar

ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 04/12/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Gurmeet Kaur Kwatra, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite order by the Registrar's Court dt.18.9.2014 counsel for the appellant has not chosen to furnish the fresh and complete address of respondent Nos. 5 and 8 for serving process. As last opportunity, two weeks time is granted. List again on 27.1.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.12.08 (DR. K.ARUL)17:04:01 ISTReason: Registrar

ITEM NO.111 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Civil Appeal No(s). 9589/2011 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 9733/2011 (With C.A. No. 2680/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 26/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Rashmi, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash,Adv. Mr. Karma Dorjee, Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Ganesh Kamath, Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matters fall under the complete category. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

¼ ITEM NO.111 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Civil Appeal No(s). 9589/2011 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 9733/2011 (With C.A. No. 2680/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 26/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Rashmi, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash,Adv. Mr. Karma Dorjee, Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Ganesh Kamath, Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matters fall under the complete category. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.11.29 (DR. K. ARUL)12:30:33 ISTReason: Registrar

ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Civil Appeal No(s). 308/2012 RADICO KHAITAN LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1233/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2194/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2740/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3359/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 24/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anurup Narula, Adv. Mr. Govind Manoharan, Adv. Mr. Akshay Arora, Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ...2/-

-2- All the appeals are ready except these three matters: C.A. No. 2738 of 2012 Fresh steps to be taken against the unserved Respondent Nos. 5 to 8, 13, 20, 24, 28 & 29. Await service of Respondent No. 33. C.A. NO. 2740 of 2012 Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, despite last opportunity, has not filed fresh address of Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. As requested, last opportunity granted. C.A. No. 3665 of 2012 Fresh steps to be taken in respect of unserved Respondent No. 7. In all the above mentioned three matters time is granted by four weeks. List on 09.01.2015. Remaining matters As and when the other connected matters become complete further necessary orders will be passed. (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

ò ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Civil Appeal No(s). 308/2012 RADICO KHAITAN LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 1233/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2194/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2738/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2740/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3359/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 3665/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 24/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anurup Narula, Adv. Mr. Govind Manoharan, Adv. Mr. Akshay Arora, Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.11.2911:35:58 ISTReason: UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ...2/- -2-All the appeals are ready except these three matters:C.A. No. 2738 of 2012 Fresh steps to be taken against the unservedRespondent Nos. 5 to 8, 13, 20, 24, 28 & 29. Await service of Respondent No. 33.

C.A. NO. 2740 of 2012 Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, despitelast opportunity, has not filed fresh address of RespondentNos. 3 & 4. As requested, last opportunity granted.C.A. No. 3665 of 2012 Fresh steps to be taken in respect of unservedRespondent No. 7. In all the above mentioned three matters time isgranted by four weeks. List on 09.01.2015.Remaining matters As and when the other connected matters becomecomplete further necessary orders will be passed. (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 8428/2011 CINEMAX INDIA LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For amendment of cause title) Date: 20/11/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Ms. Gunwant Dara, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for amendment of cause title is allowed. Amended cause title be filed within a week's time by learned counsel appearing for the appellant. I.A. No.4 of 2014 is disposed of. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1460/2012 M/S NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office Report on default) Date : 20/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Prashanth S. Shivadass, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shalinder S., Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused Office Report dated 20-11-2014. Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that he has already filed process fee and spare copies on 19-11-2014 for issuance of fresh notice of lodgment of petition of appeal to the unserved respondents. In view of the above, the Registry is directed to take steps in the matter. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ä ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1460/2012 M/S NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office Report on default) Date : 20/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Adv. Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Prashanth S. Shivadass, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shalinder S., Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused Office Report dated 20-11-2014. Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that he has already filed process fee and spare copies on 19-11-2014 for issuance of fresh notice of lodgment of petition of appeal to the unserved respondents.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by In view of the above, the Registry is directed to take stepsVishal AnandDate: 2014.11.21 in the matter.22:36:36 ISTReason: (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Þ ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 8428/2011 CINEMAX INDIA LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For amendment of cause title) Date: 20/11/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Ms. Gunwant Dara, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for amendment of cause title is allowed. Amended cause title be filed within a week's time by learned counsel appearing for the appellant. I.A. No.4 of 2014 is disposed of. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVishal AnandDate: 2014.11.2122:36:26 ISTReason:

SECTION ­ III        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 15438­15439 OF  2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.N. Traders Pvt. Ltd.           .........Petitioner ­Versus­ UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                    .........Respondents OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The office report on default was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber on 9 th  September, 2014 when the following order was passed:­ “Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads for a week's further time for filing affidavit with regard to proof of dasti service. A week's time, as prayed for, is granted.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit with regard to proof of dasti service in respect of unserved respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 16 so far.   The office report on default is listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders.  Dated this the 14 th  day of November, 2014.            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to  :­ 1. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate 92, Lawyers Chamber             2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,  Central Agency Section            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR           C­I

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  NEW DELHI  D.No.2211/2011 Sec.III Dated 28 th  March,2014 From:­ Assistant Registrar Supreme Court of India. To Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section. Review Petition No.904 of 2013     IN  Petition for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No.19481 of 2010 Union of India     ….Petitioner   ­Versus­ M/s. Indofile Chemical Company                     …. Respondents Sir, With reference to the proof of service filed by you on 11 th March, 2014 and vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of the sole respondent filed by Mr. K.V. Sreekumar, Advocate in the matter above­mentioned. It appears that the name of company (sole respondent) has been changed from M/s. Indofile chemical to Indofile Industries Ltd.   You are, therefore requested to file an application for amendment of cause title immediately. Your's Faithfully, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c1

Listed on 31/10/2013 Before Ld. Reg. Court No. 1 Item No.18   SECTION ­ III        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 15438­15439 OF  2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.N. Traders Pvt. Ltd.           .........Petitioner ­Versus­ UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                    .........Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 1 st October, 2013, when the following order was passed:­ “SLP(C) NO.15438/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has already come on record. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time for submitting the status of dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 16. SLP(C) NO.15439/2011 Matter is complete in all respects. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when other matter would become ready. List again on 31.10.2013.” SLP(C) NO.15438 of 2011 It is submitted that the counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit of dasti service along with proof of service in respect of respondent nos. 7 and 12 to 16 so far. SLP(C) NO.15439 of 2011 It is submitted that the said matter falls under complete category.    The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar with for orders.  Dated this the 30 th  day of  October, 2013.            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR         Copy to  :­ 1. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate 92, Lawyers Chamber             2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,  Central Agency Section            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR          C­I

It is submitted that Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate has on 7 th October, 2013, filed Applications for deletion the name of Respondent Nos. 5 to 17 on 7 th October, 2013, on behalf of the Petitioner but Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate is already representing the Petitioner. A letter dated 23 rd October, 2013, in this regard was issued to the said Advocate to obtain No Objection Certificate from Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate but he has not done the needful so far. has been received back from Respondent Nos. 5. Service of notice is complete.

Listed on 1/10/2013 Before Ld. Reg. Court No. 1 Item No.5   SECTION ­ III        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)NOS. 15438­15439 OF  2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.N. Traders Pvt. Ltd.           .........Petitioner ­Versus­ UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                    .........Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 2 nd September, 2013, when the following order was passed in the instant matter:­ “ Respondent nos. 1 to 4(common) in both matters have already filed counter affidavit on record. Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 16 is awaited. Registry to submit complete report about the status of the other respondents on record by next date. List again on 1.10.2013.”   It is submitted that A.D. Cards duly signed have been received back from Respondent Nos. 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 17 but no one has filed Vakalat/Appearance on behalf of them. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved cover containing notice have been received back from Respondent Nos.7, 12 to 16 so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed Affidavit alongwith proof of service regarding serving notice on the unserved Respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 6.     The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar with for orders.  Dated this the 30 th  day of  September, 2013.            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR         Copy to  :­ 1. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate 92, Lawyers Chamber             2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,  Central Agency Section ASSISTANT REGISTRAR          C­I

Listed on 10/05/2013    Before Ld. Reg. Court No. 1 Item No.13   SECTION ­ III        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)NOS. 4133 & 15438­15439 OF  2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF M/S BHARATI WALMART PVT. LTD. ........Petitioner    ­Versus­ UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                    .........Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 15 th April, 2013, when the following order was passed:­ “ SLP(C) NO.4133/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has already come on record. Respondent No.5 is granted two weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 6 and 12 are reported to be duly served but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Notice be re issued to respondent No.8 on furnishing his fresh address, by dasti, as prayed. SLP(C) NO.15438­15439/2011 Service report in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 11 to 17 is awaited. Respondent no.5 is reported to be duly served but none appeared nor any steps taken on his behalf. It is pertinent to note that office report is absolutely silent about the status/position of the remaining respondents. Detailed, specific report be submitted by next date. List again on 10.5.2013.” SLP(C) NO.4133/2011 It is submitted that there are 16 respondents. Mr. B.K. Prasad, advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance has filed on behalf of respondent no.5 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. Respondent no.4, 6, 7, 9 to 16 have been served with the show cause notice but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance  on behalf of the said respondents.  .....2/­

­2­ It is further submitted that fresh show cause notice as well as dasti notice has been issued to respondent no.8 only on 8 th  May 2013. Service is awaited.  SLP  (C ) NOS. 15438­1539 of 2011 SLP  (C ) NOS. 15438 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 16 respondents. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4. Respondent nos. 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 & 11 have been served with show cause notice but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of said respondents.  It is further submitted that fresh show cause notice was issued to the unserved respondent nos.7 & 12 to 16. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from the said respondents. Dasti notice was also given to the advocate for the petitioner for effecting service on the said unserved respondents with a request to file affidavit of dasti service alongwith proof of service but the counsel has not file the same so far.  SLP  (C ) NOS. 15439 of 2011 It is submitted that there are 5 Respondents filed Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4. Respondent no. 5 has been served with show cause notice but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of said respondent.   The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.  Dated this the 9 th   day of  May, 2013.            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR         Copy to  :­ 1. Mr. M.P. Devanath, Advocate B­6/10, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate,  Central Agency Section 3. Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR          C­I

Listed on 24/01/2013    Before Ld. Reg. Court No. 1 Item No.12   SECTION ­ III        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 4133 OF  2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF M/S BHARATI WALMART PVT. LTD. ........Petitioner    ­Versus­ UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                    .........Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report was listed before the Hon'ble Chamber Judge on 8 th August, 2012, when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following Order  :­ “Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks' time to comply with the office report.  Time granted.” Accordingly, fresh show cause notice was issued to all the unserved Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14 to 16 through regd. A.D. post on 27 th  August, 2012. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent Nos. 14 to 16, but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said Respondents. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing show cause notice have been received back from Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 so far.  The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.  Dated this the  23 rd  day of  January, 2013.            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR         Copy to  :­ 1. Mr. M.P. Devanath, Advocate B­6/10, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR          qyps

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1461/2012 M/S. NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 13/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Prashanth Shivadass,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M.Khairati,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned for a week. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY)) COURT MASTER

ð ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1461/2012 M/S. NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 13/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Prashanth Shivadass,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M.Khairati,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned for a week. (SUMAN WADHWA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY)) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2014.11.1710:40:29 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Civil Appeal No(s). 307/2012 M/S MALORY ESTATE P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report for direction) WITH C.A. No. 1232/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2143/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 3402/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 30/10/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Rituvendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Matters fall under complete category. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 18/09/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the appellant to furnish the fresh addresses of respondent Nos.5 and 8, as notices have been received with the remarks 'Office has been shifted' and 'Company does not exist'. Fresh addresses be furnished within three weeks. List again on 4.12.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

SECTION­III            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11441 OF 2011 Great Indian Restaurnt Co. Pvt. Ltd.            ......Appellant        ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors.     ......Respondents OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that pursuant to the orders of the Hon'ble Court dated 15 th December, 2011. Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal was sent to the High Court for effecting service on all the respondents. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. The certificate of service has been received from the High Court which shows that notice has been served on respondent Nos. 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 on 19 th October, 2011 and 25 th October, 2011 but no one have filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the said respondents. Respondent Nos. 5 and 8 has been received unserved with remarks “Office has been shifted” and “Company does not exist”. A letter dated 1 st November, 2013 was issued to counsel for the appellant to take steps with regard to service at Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal on unserved Nos. 5 and 8 but counsel  has not taken any steps so far. The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court for orders.  Dated this the 17 th  day of September, 2014.                                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, Advocate Ch. No. 497, Lawyer's Chamber Complex, Patiala House Courts. 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c1

ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Civil Appeal No(s). 11441/2011 GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 18/09/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the appellant to furnish the fresh addresses of respondent Nos.5 and 8, as notices have been received with the remarks 'Office has been shifted' and 'Company does not exist'. Fresh addresses be furnished within three weeks. List again on 4.12.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.09.2012:25:42 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.1/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 305/2012 SSIPL RETAIL LIMITED & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For amendment of cause title) Date: 16/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No.1 of 2014 has been filed by the appellants for striking off the name of the appellant no.2 from the array of parties in Civil Appeal No. 305 of 2012 and to take on record SSIPL Lifestyle Private Limited as the Appellant No.2 in place of Sports Station (India) Private Limited. None appears for the appellants. Hence, I.A. No.1 of 2014 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (i). Let the amended cause title be filed by the appellants. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15438-15439/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP Nos. 20720/2010 and 20724/2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 09/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Rai, Adv. For Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Gaur, Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads for a week's further time for filing affidavit with regard to proof of dasti service. A week's time, as prayed for, is granted. (R.NATARAJAN) (H.S.PARASHER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Civil Appeal No(s). 2740/2012 P.C.JEWELLER LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11396/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11398/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11399/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) Date : 29/08/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick ,Adv. Ms Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Jay Savla ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Akshay K Ghai, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A.NO.2740/2012 Despite Registrar's Court order dt.9.5.2014 the ld. Counsel for the appellant has not furnished the fresh and complete address of respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Two weeks time is granted as last opportunity to the ld. Counsel for the appellant. List again on 24.11.2014.

-2- Item No.23 REMAINING MATTERS Matters are complete for listing. As and when connected C.A. No.2740/2012 is ready, orders would be passed. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

SECTION ­ III        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2740 OF 2012 AND S.L.P. (C) NOS. 11396, 11398 AND 11399  OF 2013 P.C. Jeweller Ltd. Etc.                ........Petitioner           ­Versus­ Union of India & Ors.                             .........Respondents OFFICE REPORT C.A. NO. 2740 OF 2012: The office report was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 9 th May, 2014 when the court was pleased to pass the following order :­ “Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 on frunishing their fresh complete addressed within three weeks through the concerned District Court in addition to usual mode. List again on 29.8.2014.” It is submitted that counsel for the Appellant has not furnished the fresh and complete address of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 so far. Hence, notice could not be issued. SLP (C) NO.11396, 11398 AND 11399 OF 2013 The office report above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 2 nd  May 2014, when the following order was passed:­   “ SLP (C) NO.11396/2013 Four weeks time is granted as final chance to respondent nos. 1 to 4 for filing counter affidavit. SLP (C) NO.11398/2013 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondents has been filed on record but copy not served on the other side. Needful be done within four weks and necessary proof be filed on record. SLP (C) NO.11399/2013 Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time as final chance for filing counter affidavit. List again on 22.8.2014. ” SLP (C ) Nos. 11396 of 2013 and 11399 of 2013 It is submitted that counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has not filed counter affidavit so far.

­2­   SLP (C ) No. 11398 of 2013 It is submitted that counsel for the respondent has filed proof of service of serving the copies of the counter affidavit to the counsel for the petitioner. The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court for orders. Dated this the 28 th  day of August, 2014.                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR       Copy to  :­ 1. Mr. Praveen Kumar Mullick, Advocate 10, Lawyer's Chamber. 2. Mr. Jay Savla, Advocate    A/56­A, Lajpat Nagar­II,    Central Market, New Delhi. 3. Mr. B.K.Prasad,  Advocate,     Central Agency Section.       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR          c1

ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1460/2012 M/S NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 27/08/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Prashanth Shivdass,Adv. Mr. T.S.Ramanathan,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. B.K.Prasad,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested, four weeks' time granted for effecting service upon the unserved respondents. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER

4 ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1460/2012 M/S NIIT LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 27/08/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Prashanth Shivdass,Adv. Mr. T.S.Ramanathan,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. B.K.Prasad,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested, four weeks' time granted for effecting service upon the unserved respondents. (SUMAN WADHWA) (SUMAN JAIN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2014.08.2914:48:53 ISTReason:

Ü ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)........../2014 (CC No(s).9243/2014) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/01/2014 in CWP No.28348/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) MOHAN LAL GOYAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I.&ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 11/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.(Not present) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. To be heard along with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011 arising out of SLP(C)No.27636/2011. Until further orders, no coercive steps shall be taken during the pendency of this appeal, for recovery of the amount in question. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court MasterSignature Not Verified Assistant RegistrarDigitally signed bySarita PurohitDate: 2014.07.1517:20:03 ISTReason:

l ITEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Civil Appeal No(s). 1479/2012 M/S AHUJASONS SHAWL WALE P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 08/07/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) M/s Mitter & Mitter Co. ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A.K. Kaul, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter is complete. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.07.0916:59:49 ISTReason:

Ò ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.11 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15438-15439/2011 M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT) Date : 07/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindera Kumar Verma,Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R learned counsel for the petitioner seeks two weeks' time for effecting dasti service on respondent nos.7 and 12 to 16. Two weeks' time, as prayed for, is granted. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNarendra PrasadDate: 2014.07.0917:44:25 ISTReason:

ü IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 300 OF 2012DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSU.O.I. AND ORS Respondent(s) O R D E R The Office Report dated 28.02.2014 disclosesthat service of notice could not be effected onrespondent no.8, in view of the endorsement on thecertificate of service, which states, "Company doesnot exist at given address." Office Report further discloses that in spiteof intimation about the above fact to the counsel forthe appellant in writing on 13.07.2013, no steps weretaken for effecting service of notice on unservedrespondent no.8. With a view to give a final opportunity, theappellant is granted four weeks' time for takingnecessary steps to effect service on respondent no.8.Failing compliance within the time granted, the appealwill stand dismissed for default as against respondentno.8. ..........................J. FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLANEW DELHI;MAY 09, 2014 1ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 300 OF 2012DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSU.O.I. AND ORS Respondent(s)Date: 09/05/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Mini Kaushik,Adv.

Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Office Report dated 28.02.2014 discloses that service of notice could not be effected on respondent no.8, in view of the endorsement on the certificate of service, which states, "Company does not exist at given address." Office Report further discloses that in spite of intimation about the above fact to the counsel for the appellant in writing on 13.07.2013, no steps were taken for effecting service of notice on unserved respondent no.8. With a view to give a final opportunity, the appellant is granted four weeks' time for taking 2necessary steps to effect service on respondent no.8.Failing compliance within the time granted, the appealwill stand dismissed for default as against respondentno.8. (Narendra Prasad) (Asha Kiran Bhardwaj) Court Master Court Master 3

ÖITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2740 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDP.C.JEWELLER LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 09/05/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr Lakhmi Chand, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 onfurnishing their fresh complete addresses within three weeksthrough the concerned District Court in addition to usualmode. List again on 29.8.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARhj

pITEM NO.28 COURT NO.9 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12004/2014(From the judgement and order dated 23/01/2014 in CWP No.1153/2014 ofThe HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)VIJAY SINGLA Petitioner(s) VERSUSU.O.I.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 08/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv.(Not present)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ðITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11396/2013PALACE GARDENS CHENNAI SEZ PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,exemption from filing c/c ofthe impugned Judgment and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO.11398/2013SLP(C) NO.11399/2013Date: 02/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Jay Savla,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Aseem Kumar Katoch, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.11396/2013 Four weeks time is granted as final chance torespondent nos. 1 to 4 for filing counter affidavit.SLP(C) NO.11398/2013 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondents has beenfiled on record but copy not served on the other side.Needful be done within four weeks and necessary proof befiled on record. -2-Item No.14SLP(C) NO.11399/2013 Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are granted four weeks time asfinal chance for filing counter affidavit. List again on 22.8.2014.

(M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARhj

êITEM NO.30 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1479 OF 2012M/S AHUJASONS SHAWL WALE P.LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 30/04/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) M/S Mitter & Mitter Co.For Respondent(s) Ms. Roopa Paul, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by the counsel for the appellant, filing of statement of case is dispensed with. (Naveen Kumar) [Sneh Lata Sharma] Court Master Court Master

ìITEM NO.23 COURT NO.9 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)......../2014 CC 6506/2014(From the judgement and order dated 12/11/2013 in WP No.32059/2013 ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT HYDERABAD)M JAYAMMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 28/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Arti Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv.(Not present)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8390 of 2011. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2597 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDM/S SUPREME MOTORS P.LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for withdrawal of civil appeal)Date: 02/04/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) M/S Mitter & Mitter Co.,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Asit Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Matter falls under complete category. It be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

\232ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.8 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2680 OF 2013SATTAR & CO. & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 25/03/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR (In chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. Balaji Srinivasan,Adv. (Not present)For Respondent(s) Mr. Azim H. Laskar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None present on behalf of the appellant. Four weeks' time is granted to the appellant to file the statement of case. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Bala Kapur) Court Master Court Master

JITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 306 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAGENESISI COLORS PVT.LTD. & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 12/03/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms.Ruppal Bhatia,adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr.Abhisth Kumar,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent are present. What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that the statement of case has already been filed by both the parties. The original record has also been received. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn.| | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SB

æITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1035 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAITC LIMITED Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 12/03/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr.L.K.Bhushan,adv. M/S. Dua Associates,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears. What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that statement of case has already been filed by both the parties. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn.| | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SB

îITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1031 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SANJIV JAINDCB POWER VENTURES LIMITED Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 04/03/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Gauri Rishi, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co.,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Singh, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Original record has been received from the High Court. Parties have filed the statement of case. No further steps are to be taken. The matter falls under the complete category. Registry to processthe matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.| | | (SANJIV JAIN) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

ÐITEM NO.30 COURT NO.11 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15438-15439/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.20720/ 2010, CWPNo.20724/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 03/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks, as requested is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit of dasti service along with proof of service in respect of respondent nos. 7 and 12 to 16. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ªITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2740 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SANJIV JAINP.C.JEWELLER LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 28/02/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on respondent Nos. 1,2 and 5 to 9 but noneappeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Notice of lodgment of petition of appeal has been received from theHigh Court qua respondent Nos. 3 and 4 with the remarks "incompleteaddress". Let fresh and complete address of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 befurnished and thereafter notices be issued to the above respondents. List again on 5.5.2014.| | |(SANJIV JAIN) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

¦ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SANJIV JAINPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11396/2013PALACE GARDENS CHENNAI SEZ PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,exemption from filing c/c of theimpugned Judgment and office report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.11398 and 11399/2013(with office report)Date: 18/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Jay Savla,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yasir Rauf, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.11396/2013 Vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4(common in all the matters) has not been filed by the learned counsel forthe said respondents.. Two weeks' time is granted to the learned Advocate,Mr.B.K. Prasad for filing vakalatnama. Counter affidavit be filed withinfour weeks thereafter.Item No.42 -2-SLP(C) No.11398/2013 Service is complete. Counter affidavit has been filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that copy of thecounter affidavit has not been served by the learned counsel for therespondent. The learned counsel for the respondent to serve the copy ofthe counter affidavit and file proof thereof in the Registry.SLP(C) No.11399/2013 Service is complete. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 4 for filingcounter affidavit. List again on 28.4.2014.| | | (SANJIV JAIN) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

\226ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4290 OF 2012GSG BUILDERS & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 17/02/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv.(NP)For Respondent(s) Ms. Shalini Kumar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None present for the appellant. Statement of case has not been filed by the appellants. Appellants are directed to file statement of case within four weeks peremptorily. Respondents may file the statement of case within four weeks thereafter.|(Deepak Mansukhani) | (M.S. Negi) || Court Master | Assistant Registrar |

ITEM NO.9 Court No.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO. 3-5 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3167 OF 2012JAINA MARKETING APPLINACES PVT. LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(For restoration and c/delay in filing application for restoration anddeletion of the name of respondent)WITH I.A. NO. 3-5 IN C.A. NO. 3172 OF 2012(For restoration and c/delay in filing application for restoration anddeletion of the name of respondent)WITH I.A. NO. 3-5 IN C.A. NO. 3359 OF 2012(For restoration and c/delay in filing application for restoration anddeletion of the name of respondent)I.A. NO. 4-6 IN C.A. NO. 3305 OF 2012(For restoration and c/delay in filing application for restoration anddeletion of the name of respondent)Date: 17/02/2014 These matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing the application for restoration in all the matters is condoned. All the civil appeals are restored to their original numbers.

The names of respondent no. 5 in civil appeal No. 3167 and 3172 of 2012, respondent nos. 5-26 in civil appeal no. 3359 of 2012 and respondent no. 5 to 11 in civil appeal no. 3305 of 2012 are deleted from the array of parties at the cost and risk of the petitioners/appellants. The other respondents may be served within four weeks. -2- In addition thereto, learned standing counsel for the respondents may also be served. | (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Assistant Registrar | (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. No. 3-5 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3167 OF 2012 JAINA MARKETING APPLINACES PVT. LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH I.A. NO. 3-5 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3172 OF 2012 I.A. NO. 3-5 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3359 OF 2012 I.A. NO. 4-6 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3305 OF 2012 O R D E R Delay in filing the application for restoration in all the matters is condoned. All the civil appeals are restored to their original numbers.

The names of respondent no. 5 in civil appeal No. 3167 and 3172 of 2012, respondent nos. 5-26 in civil appeal no. 3359 of 2012 and respondent no. 5 to 11 in civil appeal no. 3305 of 2012 are deleted from the array of parties at the cost and risk of the petitioners/appellants. The other respondents may be served within four weeks. In addition thereto, learned standing counsel for the respondents may also be served. ..................J. (Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN) NEW DELHI FEBRUARY 17, 2014.

FITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8878 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDHOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 07/02/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Amit Upreti, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has made a submission at Barthat she would be taking the necessary steps for effecting service onrespondent No.7 by way of substituted service. Necessary application bemoved in three weeks time and on compliance same be placed before the ld.Registrar in office for necessary orders/directions.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hjFITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8878 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDHOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )

Date: 07/02/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Amit Upreti, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has made a submission at Barthat she would be taking the necessary steps for effecting service onrespondent No.7 by way of substituted service. Necessary application bemoved in three weeks time and on compliance same be placed before the ld.Registrar in office for necessary orders/directions.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

VITEM NO.38 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15438-15439/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.20720/2010,CWPNo.20724/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 13/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.(NP)For Respondent(s) Ms. Swati Chandra, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out twice but no one appears on behalf of tghe petitioner. In the interest of justice, list again after six weeks. [Usha Bhardwaj] [Veena Lakhina] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2192 OF 2012SATNAM SINGH TAKKAR & ANR Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report on default)Date: 13/12/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr.Abhishek Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Rabindra Kumar Mohanty, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused office report dated 04.10.2013. Four weeks' time is granted to the appellants to file theStatement of case and four weeks' time thereafter is granted to therespondents to file the statement of case. (Satish K.Yadav) (Veena Lakhina) Court Master Court Master

TITEM NO.31 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1031 OF 2012DCB POWER VENTURES LIMITED Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 22/11/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co.For Respondent(s) Ms. Shalini Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, four weeks' time is granted for filing Statement of Case. Respondents are granted four weeks' time thereafter to file the Statement of Case.|(Anita Malhotra) | |(Suresh Kumar Verma) ||Sr.PA | |Court Master |

®ITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15438-15439/2011M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 31/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.15438/2011 Despite reasonable opportunity till date status of service onrespondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 16 has not been filed on record. Office report in default be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for necessary orders/directions.SLP(C) NO.15439/2011 Matter falls under complete category. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matter would become ready.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

\236ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8878 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDHOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 31/10/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice to respondent No.7 was issued through postal service as wellas through District Court. It is pertinent to note that postal report hasbeen received with the endorsement that no such firm is found on the givenaddress. However, report from the District Court is awaited. In the lightof the report already received on record, the ld. Counsel for the appellantto furnish the fresh complete address within three weeks and on compliancenotice be issued forthwith through the usual mode in addition to the postalservice. List again on 16.12.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

äITEM NO.44 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2143 OF 2012VARDHMAN PROPERTIES LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 28/10/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR(Not Present)For Respondent(s) Ms.Neelam Jain, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused office report dated 02.08.2013. Four weeks' time is granted to both the parties to filestatement of case. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

´ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1460 OF 2012M/S NIIT LIMITED Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 28/10/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr.Amar Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath, AORFor Respondent(s) Ms.Neera Gupta, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, AOR UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused office report dated 02.08.2013. As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to the counselfor the appellant to take steps for service of notice upon the unservedrespondents. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

\232ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9288/2013(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.4139/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)ING VYSYA BANK LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 21/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner to file process fee and spare copies within four weeks.|(Anita Malhotra) | |(Veena Lakhina) ||Sr.PA | |Court Master |

` IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1459 OF 2012 M/S.BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R Office Report dated 01.08.2013 indicates that learned counsel for the appellant has not taken steps for service of notice on unserved Respondent No. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh steps for service of notice on unserved Respondent No. 5 through Registered Post with A.D. within six weeks from today, failing which, the appeal shall stand automatically dismissed qua Respondent No. 5 without further reference to the Court. .............................................J. (DIPAK MISRA) NEW DELHI OCTOBER 08, 2013ITEM NO.69 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1459 OF 2012M/S.BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 08/10/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. Amar Pratap Singh, Adv. For Mr.M.P.Devanath, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Office Report dated 01.08.2013 indicates that learned counsel forthe appellant has not taken steps for service of notice on unservedRespondent No. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh stepsfor service of notice on unserved Respondent No. 5 through Registered Post

with A.D. within six weeks from today, failing which, the appeal shallstand automatically dismissed qua Respondent No. 5 without furtherreference to the Court. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master | (Signed order is placed on the file)

0ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15438-15439/2011M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 01/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ajai K Bhatia, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.15438/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has alreadycome on record. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time forsubmitting the status of dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to16.SLP(C) NO.15439/2011 Matter is complete in all respects. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when othermatter would become ready. List again on 31.10.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

èITEM NO.100 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 286 OF 2013 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASM/S. JUBILEE HILLS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE Appellant (s) VERSUSU.O.I. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documentsDate: 26/09/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms.Filza Moonis,adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Rabindra Kumar Mohanty,adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both sides have filed their respective statement of case. It is submited that no further steps are required. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

ÌITEM NO.104 COURT NO.11 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1361 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment)WITHCivil Appeal NO. 1323-1344 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment andoffice report)Civil Appeal NO. 1346 of 2011Civil Appeal NO. 1350 of 2011Civil Appeal NO. 1360 of 2011Civil Appeal NO. 1348 of 2011(With appln(s) for permission to file affidavit)Civil Appeal NO. 1351-1358 of 2011Civil Appeal NO. 4486 of 2010Civil Appeal NO. 4487 of 2010Civil Appeal NO. 1359 of 2011Civil Appeal NO. 1347 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment)Civil Appeal NO. 4011 of 2011Civil Appeal NO. 4193 of 2011Civil Appeal NO. 4007 of 2011SLP(C) NO. 18147 of 2013(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 20460 of 2013(With office report)Date: 25/09/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Appellant(s) Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. K. Swarup, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.(Not Present) Mrs Anil Katiyar, Adv. (Not Present) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. (Not Present) Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. (Not Present) Mr. P.S.Sudheer, Adv. (Not Present)For Respondent(s) Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv.(Not Present) Ms. N.Annapoorani, Adv. (Not Present)

M/S. O.P. Khaitan & Co. Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh, Adv. (Not Present) Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv. (Not Present) Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Adv. (Not Present) M/S. M.V. Kini & Associates Mr. Ankur Mittal, Adv. (Not Present) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8878 of 2011. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

0ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1035 OF 2012ITC LIMITED Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 12/09/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. L.K. Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Adv. M/S. Dua Associates,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Six weeks' time is granted to the appellant to file statement of case as a last opportunity. Eight weeks' time thereafter is granted to the respondent to file statement of case. [ Deepak Mansukhani ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] Court Master Court Master

Listed on 2/09/2013 Before Ld. Reg. Court No. 1 Item No.14 SECTION - III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)NOS. 15438-15439 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.N. Traders Pvt. Ltd. .........Petitioner -Versus- UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .........Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report in the instant matter and other connected matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 23rd July, 2013, when the following order was passed in the instant matter:- "SLP(C) NO.15438/2011 Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 16 is awaited. Duly represented respondents have already filed counter affidavit on record. List again on 2.9.2013." It is submitted that the counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit of dasti service along with proof of service in respect of respondent nos. 7 & 12 to 16 so far. The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar with for orders. Dated this the 30th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- 1. Mr. M.P. Devanath, Advocate B-6/10, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section 3. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate 92, Lawyers Chamber ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION-III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4007 OF 2011 Union of India & Ors. ..........Appellants -Versus- Varun Juneja & Ors. . ..........Respondents OFFICE REPORT FOR PRE-FINAL HEARING It is submitted that service of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal is complete on all the four respondents through dasti service but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of all the four respondents. Original record has been received from the High Court. It is further submitted that counsel for the Appellant has filed statement of case. The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for pre-final hearing. Dated this the 30th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. B.K Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

øITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15438-15439/2011M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 02/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Mohd. Hussain, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1 to 4(common) in both matters have already filedcounter affidavit on record. Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 16 is awaited. Registry to submit complete report about the status of the otherrespondents on record by next date. List again on 1.10.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

\224ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.9 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO.3167 OF 2012JAINA MARKETING AND APPLIANCE PVT. LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)With Civil Appeal No.3172 of 2012(Office report on default)Civil Appeal No.3305 of 2012(Office report on default)Civil Appeal No.3359/2012(Office report on default)Date: 02/09/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. (N/P)For Respondent(s) UPON perusing the papers, the Court made the following O R D E R The civil appeals are dismissed for default. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master [Signed order is placed on the file] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3167 OF 2012

Jaina Marketing and Appliance Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and Ors. ...Respondent(s) With Civil Appeal No.3172 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.3305 of 2012 and Civil Appeal No.3359/2012 O R D E R The office report dated 19th August, 2013, states that on 22nd July, 2013, there was no representation of the appellant. On an earlier occasion, on behalf of the appellant, it was pleaded that appropriate application for withdrawal of the civil appeals would be filed but no such application has been filed. It is further reported that no process fee and spare copies for issue of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal was filed. Today also there is no appearance. In the above circumstances, the civil appeals are dismissed for default. ...................................J. [FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA] New Delhi, September 02, 2013.

SECTION-III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL NO. 9288 OF 2013 WITH INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 1 AND 2 (Applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the Special Leave Petition) ING Vysva Bank Ltd. .....Petitioner -Versus- Union of India & Ors. .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT The office report was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 4th July, 2013, when he was pleased to pass the following order:- "The learned counsel for the petitioner to file the process fee and spare copies within a week and on compliance notice be issued forthwith through the concerned District Court in addition to the postal service List again on 19.8.2013." It is submitted that show cause notice for usual service and through District Court could not be issued to the respondents as the counsel for the petitioner has not filed process fee/spare copies of the SLP so far. The office report is listed before the Registrar Court for order. Dated this the 29th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy To: 1 Mr. Y P Dhingra, Advocate 88, Lawye's Chamber 2 Mr. B.K. Prasad,Advocate Standing counsel for Union of India ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

4ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9288/2013ING VYSYA BANK LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP,exemptionfrom filing c/c of the impugned order and office report )Date: 30/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite specific directions no steps taken by the petitioner forgetting the notice served on the respondents. Office report on default be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for necessary orders/directions.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

VITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8878 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDHOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 27/08/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice be reissued to respondent No.7 on furnishing his fresh andcomplete address within three weeks through the concerned District Court inaddition to postal service. Service on the remaining respondents is complete but none appeared ontheir behalf. List again on 4.10.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

SECTION-III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1348 OF 2011 Union of India & Ors. ........Appellants -Versus- Harikirat Sodhi ........Respondent OFFICE REPORT FOR PRE-FINAL HEARING It is submitted that service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal in the matter above mentioned is complete and both the parties are represented through Advocates. Original record has been received from the High Court. The office report direction was listed Hon'ble Court on 7th May, 2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "None appears for the respondent. Statement of case has not been filed by the respondent. In the circumstances, right to file statement of case is closed. To be notified for hearing in due course." It is submitted that appeal is ready for hearing. The office report is listed before Ld. Registrar for pre-final hearing. Dated this is 20th day of May, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate Central Agency Section ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ZITEM NO.95 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1348 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSHARIKIRAT SODHI Respondent(s)Date: 23/08/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms. Noor Jahan,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Sharawat,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appellant has filed the statement of case. Respondent has notfiled the statement of case in spite of time granted by the Hon'ble Judgein Chamber. The right to file the statement of case stands forfeited videorder of the Hon'ble Court's Order dated 7.5.2013. The appellant submitsthat no further steps are required. List the matter before the Hon'bleCourt as per rules with an office report indicating the non-filing of thestatement of case by the respondents.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||mg | |Registrar |

\210ITEM NO.164 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9028 OF 2011M/S. PVR LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 12/08/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal, Adv. for Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) MS.Sudha Pal, Adv. For Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks' time forfiling the statement of case. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ÐITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4133/2011M/S BHARTI WAL-MART P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)SLP(C) NO.15438-15439/2011Date: 23/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv. Mr Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr Chirag M Shroff, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Shivanshi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag ,Adv Ms Pushpa Kishore, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NOS. 4133 and 15439 of 2011 These matters are complete in all respects. However, furthernecessary orders would be passed as and when connected matters would becomeready.SLP(C) NO.15438/2011 Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 12 to 16 is awaited. Duly represented respondents have already filed counter affidaviton record. List again on 2.9.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

HITEM NO.34 Court No.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3167 OF 2012JAINA MARKETING APPLINACES PVT. LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)withC.A. Nos. 3172/2012, 3305/2012, 3359/2012(Office report on default)Date: 22/07/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. (NP)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out twice since morning, none appears for the appellants. Post after four weeks. |(Shashi Sareen) | |(Indu Pokhriyal) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

âITEM NO.93 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9288/2013ING VYSYA BANK LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP,exemptionfrom filing c/c of the impugned order and office report)Date: 04/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner to file the process fee andspare copies within a week and on compliance notice be issued forthwiththrough the concerned District Court in addition to the postal service. List again on 19.8.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

tITEM NO.95 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4007 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSVARUN JUNEJA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 04/07/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Asit Tiwari,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notices addressed to respondent 1 to 4 have been returned unserved with endorsement "the respondents have shifted". Ld. counsel for the appellants granted four weeks time to take fresh steps in correct address. List the matter on 26.8.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

\220ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 10607/2013(From the judgement and order dated 08/11/2012 in DBCWP No.2348/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR)RAJMATA VIJAYARAJE SINDHIYA KRISHI U.M.S Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A. 1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 03/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K SIKRIFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief returnable in the second week of August, 2013. To be heard along with S.L.P.(C) No. 18147 of 2013. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.138 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8878 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDHOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 01/07/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Gurmeet Kaur Kwatra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the appellant to furnish the fresh andcorrect address of respondent No.7 within a week and on compliance noticebe issued forthwith through the concerned District Court besides usualmode. List again on 16.8.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3167 OF 2012JAINA MARKETING APPLINACES PVT. LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)WITHCIVIL APPEAL NO.3172/2012(Office Report on Default)CIVIL APPEAL NO.3305/2012(Office Report on Default)CIVIL APPEAL NO.3359/2012(Office Report on Default)Date: 01/07/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Dr. Sukhdev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after two weeks. [GEETA AHUJA] [INDU POKHRIYAL] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

æITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4133/2011M/S BHARTI WAL-MART P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITHSLP(C) NO.15438-15439/2011Date: 10/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Amar Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv. Mr Chirag M Shroff, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Aditya Ranjan, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Shivanshi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.4133/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has alreadycome on record. Respondent Nos. 4,6,7 and 9 to 16 are reported to be duly servedbut none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent no.5 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court. Dasti in respect of respondent No.8 is awaited. Four weeks' time isgranted. -2-Item No.13SLP(C) NO.15438/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has come onrecord. Respondent Nos. 5,6,8,9 to 11 are reported to be duly served butnone appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Dasti in respect of respondent nos. 7 and 12 to 16 is awaited.SLP(C) NO.15439/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has come onrecord. Respondent No.5 is reported to be duly served but none appeared norany steps taken on his behalf. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready. List again on 23.7.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |

hj

rITEM NO.4 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1348 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSHARIKIRAT SODHI Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file affidavit and office reportfor directions)Date: 07/05/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Appellant(s) Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Sharawat,Adv. (N.P.) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the respondent. Statement of case has not been filed by the respondent. In the circumstances, right to file statement of case is closed. To be notified for hearing in due course. |(GEETA AHUJA) | |(USHA SHARMA) ||SR. P.A. | |COURT MASTER |

\214ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9596/2013(From the judgement and order dated 05/11/2012 in DBCWP No.11550/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR)KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, NOKHA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With I.A.No. 1 - appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 06/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 1361 of 2011. Petitioners are granted liberty to file additional documents. Post after summer vacation. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sharda Kapoor) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

\206ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.14 SECTIONIII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1360 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSBAJAJ JEWELS(I) P.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report for direction)Date: 18/04/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Appellant(s) Mr. Harish Chander, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashank Bajpai, Adv. for Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K.R. Chawla, Adv. Mr. Sunil Verma, Adv. Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh, Adv. (NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Statement of case be filed by the parties within three weeks from today. Office report is ordered accordingly. |(N.S.K. Kamesh) | |(S.S.R. Krishna) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

êITEM NO.74 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9288/2013ING VYSYA BANK LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP,exemptionfrom filing c/c of the impugned order and office report)Date: 17/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the appellant to file the process fee andspare copies within a week and on compliance, notice be issued to therespondents forthwith through the concerned District Court, in addition tothe postal service. At the same time, respondent No.1 being Union ofIndia, notice be served through standing counsel. List again on 4.7.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

0ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4133/2011M/S BHARTI WAL-MART P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITHSLP(C) NO.15438-15439/2011Date: 15/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Amar Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv. Mr Chirag M Shroff, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Shivanshi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.4133/2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has alreadycome on record. Respondent No.5 is granted two weeks' time as final chance forfiling counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 6 and 12 are reported to be duly served but noneappeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Notice be re issued to respondent No.8 on furnishing his freshaddress, by dasti, as prayed. -2-Item No.7SLP(C) NO.15438-15439/2011 Service report in respect of respondent Nos. 7 and 11 to 17 isawaited. Respondent no.5 is reported to be duly served but none appeared norany steps taken on his behalf. It is pertinent to note that office report is absolutely silentabout the status/position of the remaining respondents. Detailed, specificreport be submitted by next date. List again on 10.5.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

ITEM NO.74 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8878 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDHOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 09/04/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms Mamta Saxena, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service on respondent Nos. 1 to 6 is complete. Fresh notice be issued to respondent no.7 on furnishing his freshand correct address, through the concerned District Court in addition topostal service. List again on 1.7.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 6026/2013(From the judgement and order dated 27/08/2012 in WP No.12446/2009, of TheHIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)SATTAR & CO. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1(C/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )Date: 19/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.B. Rama Subba Raju, Adv. Ms. Soumyashree Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. M.Chandra Sekhar, Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AORFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Let the appeal be heard along with C.A.No. 8390 of 2011. In the meantime, no coercive steps should be taken for recovery of arrears of service tax. |(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Juginder Kaur) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |

TITEM NO.29 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3167 OF 2012JAINA MARKETING APPLINACES PVT. LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)WITH C.A. NO. 3172/2012(Office report on default)C.A. No. 3305/2012(Office report on default)C.A. No. 3359/2012Date: 18/03/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after four weeks to enable the counsel for the appellant to move appropriate application. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERNote: No appearance slip was given in the Court.

$ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 4810/2013(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2012 in WP No.10161/2010 dated20/01/2012 in WP No.10161/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)PALACE GARDENS CHENNAI SEZ PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO.4878 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO.5225 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 12/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice, both on the special leave petition, as also on the application for condonation of delay. Let the matter be heard along with C.A. No.3345 of 2012.|(Chetan Kumar) | |(Juginder Kaur) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 4810/2013(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2012 in WP No.10161/2010, dated20/01/2012 in WP No.10161/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)PALACE GARDENS CHENNAI SEZ PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 4878 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5225 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 11/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List tomorrow (12th March, 2013).|(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Juginder Kaur) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |

òITEM NO.24 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 4810/2013(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2012 in WP No.10161/2010, dated20/01/2012 in WP No.10161/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)PALACE GARDENS CHENNAI SEZ PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1(C/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 4878 of 2013With I.A.1(C/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5225 of 2013With I.A.1(C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jay Savla, AOR Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Chaurasia, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, let these matters be adjourned till next Monday (11th March, 2013).|(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(S.S.R. Krishna) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\214ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4133/2011M/S BHARTI WAL-MART P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 06/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Amar Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ravinder Yadav, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Shivanshi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Unserved respondent Nos. 4 to 6, 8 and 12 were issued noticesthrough post as well as through concerned District Court on 11.2.2013. Service report in respect of respondent No.6,8 and 12 is awaitedfrom the concerned District Court. Reminder be issued. Respondent No.4 is reported to be duly served as reflected from thereport of the concerned District Court but none appeared nor any stepstaken on his behalf. On behalf of respondent No.5, the ld. Counsel has filed vakalatnamaon 22.2.2013. Four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. -2-Item No.9 Respondent Nos. 14 to 16 are reported to be duly served throughpost but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Remaining duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' timeas final chance for filing counter affidavit. List again on 15.4.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

\214ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4133/2011M/S BHARTI WAL-MART P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 06/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Amar Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ravinder Yadav, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms Shivanshi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Unserved respondent Nos. 4 to 6, 8 and 12 were issued noticesthrough post as well as through concerned District Court on 11.2.2013. Service report in respect of respondent No.6,8 and 12 is awaitedfrom the concerned District Court. Reminder be issued. Respondent No.4 is reported to be duly served as reflected from thereport of the concerned District Court but none appeared nor any stepstaken on his behalf. On behalf of respondent No.5, the ld. Counsel has filed vakalatnamaon 22.2.2013. Four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. -2-Item No.9 Respondent Nos. 14 to 16 are reported to be duly served throughpost but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Remaining duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' timeas final chance for filing counter affidavit. List again on 15.4.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

4ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9030 OF 2011INOX LEISURE LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 27/02/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Ms. Gauri Rishi, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co.For Respondent(s) Mr. Shravan Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice for service on the unserved respondents returnable within six weeks. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

¼ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 2139/2013(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WP No.4139/2010, of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)ING VYSYA BANK LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1(C/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport ))Date: 18/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AORFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Let the matter be heard along with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.|(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Juginder Kaur) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |

NITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4487 OF 2010 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s)Date: 15/02/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Pranav Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both sides have filed the respective statement of cases. It is submitted that no further steps are required. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per the Rules. | | |(SUNIL THOMAS) || | |Registrar || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | ||j | | |

\210ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4193 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)Date: 08/02/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms.Samina Sheikh,adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Gagan Deep Kaur,adv. Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appellant has filed the statement of case. Ld.counsel for the respondent who was granted four weeks time for filing statement of case submits that the respondents herein do not wish to file any separate statement of case, since they propose to rely upon the statement of case filed by the respondent in the connected matters. This is recorded. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

LITEM NO.80 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 7501 OF 2009 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASM/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 07/02/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. V.K. Munshi,Adv. Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohan Babu,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both sides have filed their respective statement of case. It is submitted by both sides that no further steps are required. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

8ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4486 OF 2010 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Respondent(s)Date: 06/02/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. B.S. Khanna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No further steps required. The matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as perrules.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

ÌITEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4487 OF 2010 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s)Date: 28/01/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. S. Krishnaraj,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Pranav Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appellants have filed statement of case. The respondent has not filed statement of case within the time granted by the Hon'ble Court by order dated 29.10.2012. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for appropriate orders.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15438-15439/2011M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date: 23/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Narendra Kumar Goyal,Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Roopa Paul,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By way of last opportunity, two weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to file process fee and spare copies of SLP. Registry may process the matter thereafter.| (KUSUM SYAL) | |(S.S.R.KRISHNA) ||SR.P.A | |COURT MASTER || | | |

BITEM NO.37 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.39937/2012(From the judgment and order dated 22/03/2012 in DBCWP No.8505/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR)KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, ALWAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 14/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anurag Kalavatiya, Adv. Mr. Susshil Daga, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. No stay. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011.|(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(KUSUM GULATI) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

¢ ITEM NO. 20 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 22809/2012 (Against the final judgment and order dated 2.8.2012 in WP No. 12323 of 2010 by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad) M/S. JUBILEE HILLS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I. & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report) Date: 11/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. L Nageshwara Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Wasay Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeals will be heard on the SLP paper books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with C.A. Nos. 8390 of 2011. No stay.

| [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Kusum Gulati ] ||Court Master | |Court Master |

bITEM NO.82 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9028 OF 2011M/S. PVR LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)((With office report on default)Date: 11/12/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Ms. Neha Agrawal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhisht Kumar, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused office report dated 03.10.2012. The parties are allowed eight weeks' further time to file their respective statement of case. If the needful is not done by the appellant, the appeal shall stand automatically dismissed without reference to the Court.|(Hemalatha Mohan) | (Indu Bala Kapur) || Sr.P.A. | Court Master | (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9028 OF 2011 M/S PVR LTD. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R

Perused office report dated 03.10.2012. The parties are allowed eight weeks' further time to file their respective statement of case. If the needful is not done by the appellant, the appeal shall stand automatically dismissed without reference to the Court. .................J. (G.S. SINGHVI) NEW DELHI DECEMBER 11, 2012

ITEM NO.73 COURT NO.12 SECTION III(In Chambers) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7501 OF 2009M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date: 10/12/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Appellant(s) Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mohanty,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By way of last opportunity, four weeks' time is granted to the appellant and two weeks' time thereafter is granted to the respondents for filing statement of case. (A.S. BISHT) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

¢ITEM NO.92 COURT NO.12 SECTION III(In Chambers) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4193 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date: 10/12/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Appellant(s) Mr. R. Krishnaamoorthi,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur,Adv. Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By way of last opportunity, four weeks' time is granted to the respondents for filing statement of case. In the event of default, their right to file statement of case shall stand forfeited. (A.S. BISHT) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\206ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1360 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSBAJAJ JEWELS(I) P.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date: 19/11/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By way of last opportunity, eight weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellants to file the statement of case. Respondents may file the statement of case within four weeks thereafter.|(S.K.Rakheja) | (Indu Satija) || Court Master | Court Master |

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1348 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSHARIKIRAT SODHI Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date: 19/11/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Debajyoti Behuria, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Sharawat,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By way of last opportunity, four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the respondent to file the statement of case. |(S.K.Rakheja) | (Indu Satija) || Court Master | Court Master |

ªITEM NO.1 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4486 OF 2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION)Date: 29/10/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Mr. Anil Gaur, Adv. for Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, Adv. Mr. Kunal Tandon, Adv. Mr. U.C. Mittal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Ankur Mittal, learned counsel for the respondent, prays for and is granted further time of eight weeks for filing statement of case. Office to proceed further accordingly.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

"ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4487 OF 2010UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUTV NEWS LTD. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION) Date: 29/10/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Adv. for Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, Adv. Mr. Kunal Tandon, Adv. Mr. U.C. Mittal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Ankur Mittal, learned counsel for the respondent, prays for and is granted further time of eight weeks for filing statement of case. Office to proceed further accordingly.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

bITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15438-15439/2011M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 29/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Narendra Kumar Goyal, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Anurag Kishore, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice with additional dasti service on unservedrespondents. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon thelitigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to serve through thenearest Civil Court/Trial Court where private parties are concerned andthrough standing counsel where State authorities are concerned. Process feeand spare copies are to be filed before 6.11.2012, else list before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If notices are issued, list again on 12.12.2012. Served respondents may file counter affidavit till then.| | |(S.G.SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

\200 ITEM NO. 36 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.27363/2012 (From the judgment and order dated 24/02/2012 in WPC No.13662/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM) CITY CENTRE Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 24/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sriram Parakkat, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv.-on-Record For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Respondent No.4 is restrained from taking any coercive steps to effect recovery pursuant to Circular No.98/1/2008-ST dated 4th January, 2008 till the disposal of the appeal. Tag with Civil Appeal No.7501 of 2009. |(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(KUSUM GULATI) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

øITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1346 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSM/S MADHUR IMPEX & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 23/08/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr.Soumen Talukdar,adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appellant has filed statement of case. No appearance for the respondent. It is submitted that no further steps are required. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

öITEM NO.65 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1350 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASUNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant (s) VERSUSDIVYA KALRA Respondent(s)Date: 16/08/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Duli Chand,adv. Mr.A.K.Sharma,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appellant has filed the statement of case. No appearance for the respondent. No further steps. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

Î ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 13149/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPC No.8674/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI) M/S CONCEPT ENTERTAINMENT(I) P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) Date: 09/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.-on-Record For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Appeal will be heard on the S.L.P. paper books. Additional documents, if any, be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8878 of 2011.| (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) | | (KUSUM GULATI) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

äITEM NO.21 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4133/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.16629/2010of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)M/S BHARTI WAL-MART P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)WITH SLP(C) NOS.15438-15439/2011(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date: 08/08/2012 These matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Krishnamohan Menon,Adv. Mr. M.P.Devanath,Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. Narendra Kumar Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Syed Tanweer Ahmad,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.4133/2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks' time to comply with the office report. Time granted. SLP(C) NO.15438-15439/2011 Delay in filing the process fee is condoned. Notice may now be issued to the respondents returnable in six weeks. |(NARENDRA PRASAD) | |(PHOOLAN WATI ARORA) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

4ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4486 OF 2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSUTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)WITHCIVIL APPEAL NO. 4487 OF 2010(Office report on default)Date: 06/08/2012 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) Mr. Sahdev Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused office reports dated 01.08.2012. Four weeks' time is allowed to the respondents to file statement of case in both the appeals. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Sharda Kapoor) ||Court Master | |Court Master || | | |

öITEM NO.32 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.21104/2012(From the judgment and order dated 29/02/2012 in WP No.2332/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)LADAM HOMES LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment andwith prayer for interim relief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO. 21912 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment andoffice report)Date: 30/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Singh, Adv. Mr. Anupam Mishra, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeals will be heard on the SLP Paper Books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No.3345 of 2012.|(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(KUSUM GULATI) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. NO.2 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2738 OF 2012NINETY NINE GEN.RETAIL P.LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Appln(s) for modification of Court's Order and office report)Date: 16/07/2012 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Appellant(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Madhurendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RI.A. NO.2 in C.A. NO.2738/2012 The application is dismissed as not pressed.|(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(KUSUM GULATI) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÂITEM NO.136 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4011 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHM/S JDS APPARELS PVT. LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSU.O.I. & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 13/07/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. P.S.Sudheer,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Prasanta Varma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Registry to process the matter for final hearing.| | | (S.G. SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

\236ITEM NO. 45 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 6067/2012(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2011 in WPNo.11947/2008 renumbered as WPC No.6208/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT N. DELHI)GSG BUILDERS & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)Date: 04/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv.-on-RecordFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Despite opportunity additional affidavit with regard to the arrears of Service Tax has not been filed. Accordingly, we grant leave. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. No stay. Tag with C.A. No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 6016/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.3398/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)M/S. FIORANO MOTORS LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and c/delay in filingSLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and exemption from filing c/c ofthe impugned judgment and office report)Date: 16/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Krishan Narang, Adv. Mr. Raman Kr. Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Bala, Adv. Mr. Manendra Dubey, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted. Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. ...2/- :2: In the meantime the respondents are restrained from recovering the arrears towards Service Tax, levied under sub-clause (zzzz) of Clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended) as on 30th September, 2011, subject to petitioner's depositing the entire amount of arrears, as on

the said date, with the concerned Commissioner, on or before 31st May, 2012. We further clarify that there is no stay of any kind whatsoever, insofar as the payment of Service Tax under the said provision with effect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with C.A. No. 8390/2011.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

LITEM NO.21 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 6067/2012(From the judgment and order dated 10/10/2011 in WP No.11947/2008 renumbered as WPC No. 6208/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFDELHI AT N. DELHI)GSG BUILDERS & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND C/DELAY IN REFILING SLPAND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 13/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv.-on-record Mr. Vismai Rao, Adv. Mr. Hiittender Nath, Adv. Mr. K. Subba Rao, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prays for some time to file additional affidavit indicating the amount of arrears towards the service tax as on 30th September, 2011. Let the needful be done within two weeks. List thereafter. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO. 39 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.6021/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.19939/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH)BHARTI RETAIL LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents andexemption from filing legible copies of dim annexures and withprayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 02/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Alok Yadav, Adv. Mr. Pawan Shree Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Krishna M. Menon, Adv. Mr. M.P.Devanath, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. In the meantime the respondents are restrained from recovering the arrears towards Service Tax, levied under sub-clause (zzzz) of Clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended) as on 30th September, 2011, subject to petitioner's depositing the entire amount of arrears, as on the said date, with the concerned Commissioner, within eight weeks from today. We further clarify that there is no stay of any kind whatsoever, insofar as the payment of Service Tax under the said provision with effect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with C.A. No. 8390/2011.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

\202ITEM NO. 30 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.9313/2012(From the judgment and order dated 19/20.01.2012 in WPNo.1456/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)MAH.CHAMBER OF HNG.INDUS.& ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 30/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Subramanian, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.-on-Record Mr. Gaurav Goel, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Parimal K. Shroff, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8390 of 2011. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

jITEM NO. 14 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 5063/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5123/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. No. 1(C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 30/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv.-on-RecordFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with C.A. No. 8390 of 2011. In the meantime, we direct that subject to appellant's depositing the amount of arrears of Service Tax as on 30th September, 2011, within four weeks from today with the concerned Commissioner, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondents to recover the amount of arrears as on the said date. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

$ITEM NO. 24 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 5275/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.1787/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)M/S SHREYANS LIFESTYLE P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. No. 1(C/Delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)Date: 30/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.-on-Record Mr. Raman Kr. Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Manindra Dubey, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Bala, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to file an affidavit showing the arrears towards the Service Tax as on 30 th September, 2011. Let him do so within two weeks. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO. 20 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4625/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.3398/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)RAJENDER KUMAR CHAWALA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA. & ORS. Respondent(s)(For permission to file SLP and office report)Date: 26/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv.-on-RecordFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file SLP is granted. Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with C.A. No. 8390 of 2011. The balance amount of arrears as on 30th September, 2011, shall be deposited within four weeks from today. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

|ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4597/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5138/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)JAINA MARKETING AND APPLIANCE PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT) WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 4607 of 2012WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 23/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. Mr. G.G. Padmakar Tripathi, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeals will be heard on the SLP Paper Books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

ZITEM NO.19 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4701/2012(From the judgment and order dated 10/10/2011 in WPNo.7139/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)WOCKHARDT HOSPITALS LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 23/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv. Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv. Mr. Varun Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuj Sarma, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Nair, Adv. for M/S. K.J. John & Co.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8878 of 2011. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

FITEM NO. 21 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6021/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.19939/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)BHARTI RETAIL LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents andexemption from filing legible copies of dim annexures and withprayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 12/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishan Mohan Menon, Adv. Mr. Pawan Shree Aggrawal, Adv. Mr. Alok Yadav, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to file additional documents. Let him do so within two weeks. List thereafter. In the meantime, we direct the office to prepare a list of all the cases wherein the levy of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 ..2/- : 2 :read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (asamended) has been challenged and this Court has eitherdeclined or granted interim stay of arrear of ServiceTax. After the list is ready the office shall obtainfurther instructions in the matter. In the list to beprepared in a tabulated form, the date of interimorder, if any, and the names of Advocate-on-Record,shall also be mentioned against each of the cases.Copies of orders shall be annexed with the report. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

\220ITEM NO. 38 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).493/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPC No.202/2011of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)NINETY NINE GEN.RETAIL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. for Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellants on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax as on 30th ..2/- : 2 :September, 2011, we direct that subject toappellant's clearing all the arrears payable as onthe said date in three equated instalments, payableon or before 15th March, 2012; 15th May, 2012 and15th July, 2012, no coercive steps shall be takenagainst the appellant for the recovery of the saidarrears. However, in the event of default on thepart of the appellants in deposit of any one of theinstalments by the due date, it will be open to therespondents to recover the entire amount in arrearsforthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ]

Court Master Court Master

öITEM NO. 44 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3568/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WP No.6345/2010of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)P.C.JEWELLER LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Ms. Soma Mullick, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Nidha, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax as on 30th September, 2011, we direct that subject to appellant's clearing all the arrears due as on the said date, on or before 15th April 2012, no coercive ..2/- 2 :steps shall be taken against the appellant for therecovery of the said arrears. However, in the eventof default on the part of the appellant indepositing the said arrears by the afore-noteddate, it will be open to the respondents torecover the entire amount in arrears forthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

RITEM NO. 39 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 2313/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.968/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)R.A.P.GATRMENTS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. No. 1(C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellants on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax as on 30th ..2/- : 2 :September, 2011, we direct that subject toappellant's clearing all the arrears payable as onthe said date in three equated instalments, payableon or before 15th March, 2012; 15th May, 2012 and15th July, 2012, no coercive steps shall be takenagainst the appellant for the recovery of the saidarrears. However, in the event of default on thepart of the appellants in deposit of any one of theinstalments by the due date, it will be open to therespondents to recover the entire amount in arrearsforthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

¸ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.9 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CC 22094/2011Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011(From the judgement and order dated 04/08/2011 in WPNo.7910/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY)BATA INDIA LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 27/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASADFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Pawan Shree Agrawal, Adv. for Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Notice. Leave granted. Tag with C.A.No.8390/2011. (G.V.Ramana) (Sharda Kapoor) Court Master Court Master

\220ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1084/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5241/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)M/S SUPREME MOTORS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 24/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sarva Mitter, Adv. for M/S Mitter & Mitter Co.For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Zaid Ali, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax as on 30th September, 2011, we direct that subject to appellant's clearing all the arrears due as on the said date, on or before 31st March, 2012, no coercive stepsshall be taken against the appellant for therecovery of the said arrears. However, in the event ..2/- : 2 :of default on the part of the appellant indepositing the said arrears by the afore-noteddate, it will be open to the respondents torecover the entire amount in arrears forthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned.

Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

pITEM NO.41 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.493/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.202/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)NINETY NINE GEN.RETAIL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 24/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R There is a request for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel Mr. Santosh Kumar is indisposed. Call the matter on 2nd March, 2012. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

,ITEM NO. 14 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 22094/2011(From the judgement and order dated 04/08/2011 in WPNo.7910/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)BATA INDIA LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. No. 1(C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 21/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Alok Yadav, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv. Mr. K Krishnamohan Menon, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List before the bench of which one of us, (D.K.Jain, J) is not a member. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

\226ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 2858/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in CWPNo.7930/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)SATNAM SINGH TAKKAR & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT) WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 2943 of 2012WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 2997 of 2012WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 3003 of 2012WITH I.A. 1 (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 17/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pritesh Kapur, Adv.SLP(C) CC 2858/12, Mr. Bharat Arora, Adv.CC 2943/12, 2997/12 Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. Mr.Navin Chawla, Adv. Ms. Vatsala Singh, Adv.SLP(C) CC 3003/12 Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. Mr.Bhargava V. Desai, Adv. Mr. Avijit Bhushan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)...CC 2858/12- Satnam Singh Takkar & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. SLP(C)...CC 2943/12-M/s. Tacfab Fashions P.Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. SLP(C)...CC 2997/12 - M/s Sahbi Textiles P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. SLP(C)...CC 3003/12 - Estocorp (India) P. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. ... Delay condoned. Leave granted. ..2/- : 2 : The appeals will be heard on the SLP PaperBooks. Additional documents, if any, may be filedby the parties. Having heard learned counsel for theappellants on the question of stay with regard tothe arrears of service tax as on 30th September,

2011, we direct that subject to each of theappellants clearing all the arrears payable as onthe said date in three equated instalments, payableon or before 15th March, 2012; 15th May, 2012and 15th July, 2012, no coercive steps shall betaken against the appellants for the recovery ofthe said arrears. However, in the event of defaulton the part of the appellants in deposit of any oneof the instalments by the due date, it will be opento the respondents to recover the entire amount inarrears forthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

vITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20685/2011PALIWAL INFRAS.P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 17/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Ramita Guha, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr A.K.Sharma, ADv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No request for filing counter affidavit. List before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (S.G.SHAH) REGISTRARhj

DITEM NO. 51 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).36213/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.1996/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)VARDHMAN PROPERTIES LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 13/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Megha Suri, Adv. Mr. Shami Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax as on 30th ..2/- : 2 :September, 2011, we direct that subject toappellant's clearing all the arrears payable as onthe said date in three equated instalments, payableon or before 15th March, 2012; 15th May, 2012 and15th July, 2012, no coercive steps shall be takenagainst the appellant for the recovery of the saidarrears. However, in the event of default on thepart of the appellant in deposit of any one of theinstalments by the due date, it will be open to therespondents to recover the entire amount in arrearsforthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.

[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

:#ITEM NO. 38 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).132/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.6376/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)NIRULAS CORNER HOUSE PVT.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO. 1429 of 2012(With appln. for directions and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)Date: 10/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravi Verma, Adv.In SLP 132/2012 Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv.In SLP 1429/12 Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 132/2012-Nirulas Corner House Pvt. Ltd. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. ..2/- : 2 : Having heard learned counsel for theappellant on the question of stay with regard tothe arrears of service tax as on 30th September,2011, we direct that subject to appellant'sclearing all the arrears (as stated in additionalaffidavit dated 8th February, 2012) payable as onthe said date in three equated instalments, payableon or before 1st March, 2012; 1st May, 2012 and1st July, 2012, no coercive steps shall be takenagainst the appellant for the recovery of the saidarrears. However, in the event of default on thepart of the appellants in deposit of any one of theinstalments by the due date, it will be open to therespondents to recover the entire amount in arrearsforthwith. We clarify that there is no stay of

imposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.SLP(C)No. 1429/2012- M/s Mohan Clothing Co.P. Ltd. I.A. No. 1 for directions is dismissed as notpressed. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book.Additional documents, if any, may be filed by theparties. Having heard learned counsel for theappellant on the question of stay with regard to ..3/- : 3 :the arrears of service tax as on 30th September,2011, we direct that subject to appellant'sclearing all the arrears (as stated in additionalaffidavit dated 8th February, 2012) payable as onthe said date in three equated instalments, payableon or before 1st March, 2012; 1st May, 2012 and1st July, 2012, no coercive steps shall be takenagainst the appellant for the recovery of the saidarrears. However, in the event of default on thepart of the appellant in deposit of any one of theinstalments by the due date, it will be open to therespondents to recover the entire amount in arrearsforthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011, is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

`ITEM NO. 20 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3568/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WP No.6345/2010of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)P.C.JEWELLER LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 10/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mrs. Soma Mullick, Adv. Mr. Niraj Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to file an additional affidavit, indicating the total amount of arrears of service tax as on 30th September, 2011. Let the needful be done within two weeks. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

\ITEM NO. 15 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 2313/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.968/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)R.A.P.GARMENTS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. No. 1(C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 10/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. Mr. vivek Vishnoi, Adv. Ms. Seema Joshi, Adv. Mr. Ahmad S Azhar, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to file an additional affidavit, indicating the total amount of arrears of service tax as on 30th September, 2011. Let the needful be done within two weeks. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

\206ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.2453/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5896/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD.& ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 30/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. D. Roychaudhauri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nilofar Qureshi, Adv. Ms. Khushi Mohd. Adv. Mr. M.Z. Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Alkanshree, Adv. Mr. Rajat Jain, Adv. Mr. A.K. Jha, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8878 of 2011. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

¸ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.32250/2011(From the judgment and order dated 04/08/2011 in WPNo.2417/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)M/S BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and permission to file additional documents andexemption from filing legible copies of dim annexures and withprayer for interim relief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO. 33380 of 2011(With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents andexemption from filing legible copies of dim annexures and withprayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 33381 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to file additional documents andexemption from filing legible copies of dim annexures and withprayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 30/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pawan Shree Agrawal, Adv. for Mr. M.P.Devanath, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeals will be heard on the SLP Paper Books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

^$ITEM NO. 45 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.32536/2011(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WP No.4319/2010of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)MASPAR INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO. 33992 of 2011(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 30/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Krishna Dev, Adv. Mr. Shailendera Kishore, Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.32536/2011 (Maspar Industries Private Ltd. versus Union of India & Ors.) Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. ...2/- :2: Having heard learned counsel for theappellant on the question of stay with regard tothe arrears of service tax due as on 30thSeptember, 2011, we direct that subject toappellant's clearing all the arrears as on thesaid date within six months in three equatedinstalments, payable on or before 1st March, 2012,1st May, 2012 and 1st July, 2012, no coercive stepsshall be taken against the appellant for therecovery of the said arrears. However, in theevent of default on the part of the appellant in

deposit of any one of the instalments by the duedate, it will be open to the respondents torecover the entire amount in arrears forthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofaras the future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. ...3/- :3:SLP(C) No.33992/2011 (Rajesh Mahajan versus Unionof India & Ors.) Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP PaperBook. Additional documents, if any, may be filedby the parties. Having heard learned counsel for theappellant on the question of stay with regard tothe arrears of service tax due as on 30thSeptember, 2011, we direct that subject toappellant's clearing all the arrears as on thesaid date within six months in three equatedinstalments, payable on or before 1st March, 2012,1st May, 2012 and 1st July, 2012, no coercive stepsshall be taken against the appellant for therecovery of the said arrears. However, in theevent of default on the part of the appellant indeposit of any one of the instalments by the duedate, it will be open to the respondents torecover the entire amount in arrears forthwith. ...4/- :4:

We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofaras the future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO. 12 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).132/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.6376/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)NIRULAS CORNER HOUSE PVT.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO. 2659 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 1429 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)(With I.A. No. 1 -appln. for direction)Date: 27/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Adv. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.A. Rana, Adv. Ms. Devina Sehgal, Adv. for M/S Gagrat & Co., Advs.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 132/2012-Nirulas Corner House Pvt. Ltd.& SLP(C) No. 1429/2012- M/s Mohan Clothing Co.P. Ltd.) Learned counsel for the appellants in these ..2/- : 2 :appeals pray for time to file additional affidavit,indicating the amount of arrears towards service tax ason 30th September, 2011. Let them do so within oneweek. List thereafter.SLP(C) No. 2659/2012(Thomas Cook India Ltd.) Mr. Haksar,learned senior counsel appearing forthe petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitionstating that the petitioner would like to move the HighCourt for review of the impugned judgment as the factsin the petitioner's case were entirely different from

the facts in other cases which have been decided by thefull bench by a common judgment. Accordingly, Thespecial leave petition is dismissed as not pressed. Itgoes without saying that we have not expressed anyopinion on the merits of the submissions made bylearned counsel. As and when the review application isfiled, it will be considered on its own merits,uninfluenced by the withdrawal of this petition. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ P.S. Tyagi ] Court Master Court Master

¢ITEM NO. 36 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 996/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.6604/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)DCB POWER VENTURES LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A. No. 1(C/Delay in filing SLP,permission to fileadditional documents and office report)Date: 23/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Adv. Ms. Gauri Rishi, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co.,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. No stay. Tag with C.A. No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

6ITEM NO. 41 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1084/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5241/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)M/S SUPREME MOTORS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 23/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gautam Narayan, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv. for M/S Mitter & Mitter Co.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to file an affidavit showing the arrears of service tax as on 30th September, 2011. Let the needful be done within two weeks. List thereafter. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

tITEM NO.33 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.852/2012(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.7106/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)P.K.HOSPITLITY SERVICES P.LTD.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and permission to file additional documents and withprayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 20/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Adv. Mr. Vinay J Hedge, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellants on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax due as on 30th September, 2011, we direct that on each of the appellants' clearing all the arrears as on the saiddate in three equated instalments, on or before 1st ..2/- : 2 :March, 2012; 1st May, 2012 and 1st July, 2012, nocoercive steps shall be taken against theappellants for the recovery of the said arrears.However, in the event of default on the part of theappellants in deposit of any one of the instalments

by the due date, it will be open to therespondents to recover the entire amount in arrearsforthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011, is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

æITEM NO. 34 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).253/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.4929/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)ITC LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 16/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. L.K. Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Behl, Adv. for M/s. Dua Associates,Advs.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. No stay. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

FITEM NO.29 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.36213/2011(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPCNo.1996/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)VARDHMAN PROPERTIES LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 13/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shammi Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha, Adv. Ms. Megha Suri, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to file an additional affidavit indicating the amount of arrears due from the petitioner towards the service tax as on 30th September, 2011. Let the needful be done within two weeks. List immediately thereafter. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

øITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20685/2011PALIWAL INFRAS.P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 13/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Ramita Guha, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Outcome of dasti service is to be filed on record onor before 10.2.2012. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

\220ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.36466/2011(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.3398/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSU.O.I. AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and permission to file additionaldocuments and office report)Date: 06/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishore Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Gitanjali Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Harsh P Parekh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sahil, Adv. Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr.A.K. Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for impleadment is dismissed. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant on the question of stay with regard tothe arrears of service tax due as on 31st ..2/- : 2 :December, 2011, we direct that on appellant'sclearing all the arrears as on the said date inthree equated instalments, on or before 29thFebruary, 2012; 30th April, 2012 and 30th June,

2012, no coercive steps shall be taken against theappellant for the recovery of the said arrears.However, in the event of default on the part of theappellant in deposit of any one of the instalmentsby the due date, it will be open to therespondents to recover the entire amount in arrearsforthwith. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st January, 2012 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

lITEM NO.45 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.31709/2011(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5751/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)RITIKA PVT.LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 16/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax due from them prior to 30th September, 2011, we direct as follows: (i) The appellant shall deposit with the concerned department 50% of the arrears towards the said tax in three equated instalments, on or before 31st December, 2011; 29th February, 2012 and 30th April, 2012; ...2/- :2:(ii) for the balance 50%, the appellant shallfurnish a solvent surety to the satisfaction of thejurisdictional Commissioner;(iii) the appellant shall also file affidavit inthis Court, within four weeks from todayundertaking to pay the balance arrears of servicetax, stayed in terms of this order, as may be

directed by this Court at the time of finaldisposal of the appeal; and(iv) the successful party in this appeal shall beentitled to interest on the amount stayed by thisCourt at such rate as may be directed at the timeof final disposal of the appeal. It is clarified that this interim ordershall apply only in case of filing of the requisiteaffidavit within a period of four weeks from today.We further direct that any default in deposit ofany one of the instalments by the dates fixedabove, would result in vacation of this stay orderand it will be open to the department to recoverthe balance amount in accordance with law. ...3/- :3: We further clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

PITEM NO.MM 4-C COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 21252/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.3398/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)GREAT INDIAN RESTAURANT CO.P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and prayer for interimrelief, appln. for impleadment,appln. for taking additionaldocuments on record and exemption from filing c/c))WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21289 of 2011(With appln. for permission to file SLP, impleadment, prayer forinterim relief, appln for taking additional documents on recordand exemption from filing c/c)Date: 15/12/2011 These Petitions were called on in mentioning Board today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raj Kishfor Choudhary, Adv. Mr. rishi Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Gitanjali Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. H.P. Rawal, ASG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. Harsh N Parekh, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)...CC 21252/2011- (Great Indian Restaurant Co.P. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors.) ..2/- : 2 : Permission to file SLP is granted. Application for impleadment is dismissed. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP PaperBook. Additional documents, if any, may be filedby the parties. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), as regardsthe arrears as well as the future liability

towards service tax. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.SLP(C)...21289/2011(Devyani International Ltd. vs. U.O.I. & Ors.) Permission to file SLP is granted. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays fortime to file an additional affidavit stating the amountof arrears towards the service tax as on 31/12/2011.Let the needful be done within two weeks. List thereafter. Application for impleadment will be consideredon the next date. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

^ITEM NO. 60 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8878 OF 2011HOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA) LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 12/12/2011 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. MrSaurav Kirpal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Adv. Mr.K. Swami, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Adv. for Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let fresh notice issue to respondent Nos. 5 to 10. The appellant is permitted to file details of arrears of Service Tax in terms of order dated 14th October, 2011 with advance copy to learned counsel for the respondents within four weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

öITEM NO.35 & 61 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.32536/2011(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.4319/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)MASPAR INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 33992/2011(With appln. for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date:09/12/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Senthil Jagadeesan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prays for time to file additional affidavit, indicating the particulars of the properties in respect of which Service Tax liability is sought to be challenged. The amount of rents paid/payable in respect of each of the properties shall also be mentioned in the affidavit along with the details of total arrears upto 30th November, 2011. Let the needful be done within two weeks. List in the month of January, 2012. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

ÒITEM NO.10 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. NO.3 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9029 OF 2011FLEMINGO DUTY FREE SHOP P.LTD. Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Appln(s) for extension of time to comply with order dated21.10.2011 and office report)Date: 07/12/2011 This application was called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv. Mr. Raktim Goudi, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NO. 3 IN C.A. NO. 9029/2011 A letter has been circulated on behalf of the applicant seeking permission to withdraw the application. As prayed, the application is dismissed as not pressed. (VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

\226ITEM NO. 37 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31709/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5751/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)RITIKA PVT.LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 02/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for short adjournment to file an affidavit stating the amount of arrears towards the service tax, due as on 30th November, 2011. Let the needful be done within one week. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2328/2011P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH SLP(C) NO. 15438-15439 of 2011SLP(C) NO. 20685 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4133 of 2011(With office report)Date: 01/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Madaan, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff, Adv. Mr. Arpan Behl, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anurag Kishore, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.20685/2011, issue fresh notice withdasti service upon the unserved respondents, which ispermitted to be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trialcourt, where private parties are concerned and throughstanding counsel, where state authorities are concerned.Item No.48 -2- Process fee and spare copies are to be filed before12.12.2011. If it is filed within time, issue notice as perabove order. List again on 13.1.2012. Served respondents may file counter affidavit tillthen.SLP(C) Nos.15438-15439/2011

Files not received as the same have been sent forlisting before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

\212ITEM NO.MM 4-A COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 2 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9028 OF 2011M/S. PVR LTD. Appellant (s)/ Applicant(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(For permission to deposit the service Tax to the service TaxAuthority)Date: 25/11/2011 This Application was called on in Mentioning Board today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s)/ Mr. C.A. Sundram, Sr. Adv.Applicant(s) Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv. for Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Sr.Adv. Mr. K Swami, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 2 is dismissed as not pressed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Veena Khera ] Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO. 34 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29402/2011(From the judgement and order(s) dated 23/09/2011 in WPNo.5074/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)M/S FLEMINGO JEWELLERY INDIA P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 11/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arunabh Choudhury, Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv. Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax due from the appellant prior to 30th September, 2011, we direct as follows: ..2/- : 2 :(i) The appellant shall deposit with theconcerned department 50% of the arrears towards thesaid tax within six months in three equatedinstalments, on or before 1st December, 2011; 1st

February and 1st April, 2012;(ii) for the balance 50%, the appellant shallfurnish a solvent surety to the satisfaction of thejurisdictional Commissioner;(iii) the appellant shall also file affidavit inthis Court, within four weeks from todayundertaking to pay the balance arrears of servicetax, stayed in terms of this order, as may bedirected by this Court at the time of finaldisposal of the appeal; and(iv) the successful party in these appeal shall beentitled to interest on the amount stayed by thisCourt at such rate as may be directed at the timeof final disposal of the appeal. It is clarified that this interim ordershall apply only in case of filing of therequisite affidavit within a period of four weeksfrom today. We further direct that any default indeposit of any one of the instalments by the datesfixed above, would result in vacation of this stay ..3/- : 3 :order and it will be open to the department torecover the balance amount in accordance with law. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.

[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

¢ITEM NO.MM 4-B COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.29950/2011(From the judgment and order dated 23/09/2011 in WP No.7369/2010of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 04/11/2011 This Petition was mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prem Prakash,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant on the question of stay with regard to the arrears of service tax due from the appellant prior to 30th September, 2011, we direct as follows: (i) The appellant shall deposit with the concerned department 50% of the arrears towards the said tax within six months in three equated instalments, on or before 1st December, 2011; 1st February, 2012 and 1st April, 2012; ...2/- :2:(ii) for the balance 50%, the appellant shallfurnish a solvent surety to the satisfaction of thejurisdictional Commissioner;(iii) the appellant shall also file affidavit inthis Court, within four weeks from today

undertaking to pay the balance arrears of servicetax, stayed in terms of this order, as may bedirected by this Court at the time of finaldisposal of the appeal; and(iv) the successful party in this appeal shall beentitled to interest on the amount stayed by thisCourt at such rate as may be directed at the timeof final disposal of the appeal. It is clarified that this interim ordershall apply only in case of filing of the requisiteaffidavit within a period of four weeks from today.We further direct that any default in deposit ofany one of the instalments by the dates fixedabove, would result in vacation of this stay orderand it will be open to the department to recoverthe balance amount in accordance with law. ...3/- :3: We further clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.(VINOD LAKHINA) (VEENA KHERA) Court Master Court Master

¤>ITEM NO.33 & 61 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.27982/2011(From the judgment and order(s) dated 04/08/2011 in WPNo.2188/201 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)CROWN INN PVT.LTD. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO. 28049 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28446 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28468 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28542 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28109 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28619 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28621 of 2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP (C) NO.28873/2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report) ...2/- :2:SLP(C) NO.29171/2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO.29174/2011(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 29181/2011

(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 21/10/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s)SLP 27982/11,SLP 28542/11SLP 28621/11, SLP 29174/11SLP 29181/2011 & rr inSLP 28109/11 Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv.SLP 28446/11 & Mr. M.P. Jha, Adv.SLP 28468/11 Mr. Ameet Naik, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Bhatia, Adv.SLP 28049/11SLP 28109/11, Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv.SLP 28619/11 & Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv.SLP 29171/11 Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co.SLP(C) 28873/2011 Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Anupal Lal Das, Adv. Mr. G. Panmei, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Adv.Mr. K. Swami, Adv.Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv.Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. ...3/- :3: UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP (C) NO. 28619 OF 2011 The Special Leave Petition is dismissed asnot pressed.SLP(C) NO. 27982 OF 2011 (Crown Inn Pvt. Ltd. &Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors.),SLP(C) NO. 28049 OF 2011 (Inox Leisure LimitedVersus Union of India & Ors.)SLP(C) NO. 28446/2011 (PJL Clothing (India) Ltd. &Anr. Versus Union of India & Ors.)SLP(C) NO. 28468 OF 2011 [Infiniti Retail Ltd.Versus Union of India & Ors.]

SLP(C) NO. 28542 OF 2011 [Horseshoe Retail HoldingsPvt. Ltd. & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors.]SLP(C) NO. 28109 OF 2011 [Fame India Ltd. versusUnion of India & Ors.)SLP(C) NO.28621 OF 2011 [M/S PVR. LTD. versus Unionof India & Ors.]SLP(C) NO. 28873 OF 2011 [Flemingo Duty Free ShopP. Ltd. versus Union of India & Ors.]SLP(C) NO. 29171 OF 2011 [Inox Leisure Ltd. versusUnion of India & Ors.]SLP(C) No. 29174 of 2011 [Spice Retail Ltd. & Anr.Versus Union of India & Ors.)SLP(C) NO. 29181 OF 2011 [LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONALPVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.] Leave granted. The appeals will be heard on the SLP PaperBooks. Additional documents, if any, may be filedby the parties. ...4/- :4: Mr. K. Swami, learned counsel, for Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate-on-record, accepts notice onbehalf of Union of India. Having heard learned counsel for the partieson the question of stay with regard to the arrearsof service tax due from the appellants prior to 30thSeptember, 2011, we direct as follows:(i) Each of the appellants, who are before us,shall deposit with the concerned department 50% ofthe arrears towards the said tax within six monthsin three equated instalments, on or before 1stNovember, 2011; 1st January 2012 and 1st March, 2012;(ii) for the balance 50%, each of the appellants'in these appeals shall furnish a solvent surety tothe satisfaction of the jurisdictional

Commissioner;(iii) the appellants shall also file affidavits inthis Court, within four weeks from todayundertaking to pay the balance arrears of servicetax, stayed in terms of this order, as may bedirected by this Court at the time of finaldisposal of the appeals; and ...5/- :5:(iv) the successful party in these appeals shall beentitled to interest on the amount stayed by thisCourt at such rate as may be directed at the timeof final disposal of the appeals. It is clarified that this interim ordershall apply only in the case of those appellantsbefore us, who file the requisite affidavits withina period of four weeks from today. We furtherdirect that any default in deposit of any one ofthe instalments by the dates fixed above, wouldresult in vacation of this stay order and it willbe open to the department to recover the balanceamount in accordance with law. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax witheffect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

\216[ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8390 OF 2011M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Appellant (s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and with prayer for interimrelief)WITHCivil Appeal NO. 8391-8393 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Civil Appeal NO. 8397 of 2011(With appln(s) for continuation of interim relief and withprayer for interim relief and office report)Civil Appeal NO. 8398 of 2011(With appln(s) for continuation of interim relief and withprayer for interim relief and office report)Civil Appeal NO. 8428 of 2011(With appln(s) for permission to file addl.documents and withprayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 14/10/2011 These matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Mr. H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv.CA 8390/11, Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv.CA 8391-8393/11 Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv. ..2/- : 2 :CA 8397/11 & Mr. M.P. Jha, Adv.CA 8398/11 Mr. Ameet Naik, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Vatsal Shah, Adv.CA 8428/11 Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Adv. Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv. Ms. Gauri, Adv.

for M/S. Khaitan & Co., Advs.For Respondent(s)CA 8390/11 Mr. Vivek Tankha, ASG Mr. K. Swami, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Mr. Sumeet Sodhi, Adv. Mr. D Kumaran, Adv. Mr. Harsh Parashar, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv.Applicant in Mr. Prakash Shah, Adv.CA 8390/11 & rr. Mr. Jay Savla, Adv.23 in CA 8397/11 Ms. Meenakshi Ogra, Adv. Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Adv. Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kavin Gulati, Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Jatin Mongia, Adv. Ms. Lakshmi Ramachandran, Adv. for M/s. Karanjawala & Co., Advs. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned Additional Solicitor General prays for time to file counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents. Let the needful be done within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if necessary, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. Having regard to the issue and revenue involved, we expedite the hearing of the appeals. ..3/- : 3 : C.A. No. 8390/2011 - M/s Retailers Association of India vs. Union of India & Ors. Having heard learned counsel for the parties onthe question of stay with regard to the arrears ofservice tax due from the members of the appellantassociation prior to 30th September, 2011, we direct asfollows:(i) all members of the appellant association,namely, Retailers Association of India, who are beforeus, shall deposit with the concerned department 50% ofthe arrears towards the said tax within six months inthree equated instalments, on or before 1st November,2011; 1st January 2012 and 1st March, 2012; (ii) for thebalance 50% all the members shall furnish a solventsurety to the satisfaction of the jurisdictionalCommissioner; (iii) they shall file individual

affidavits in this Court, within four weeks from todayundertaking to pay the balance arrears of service tax,stayed in terms of this order, as may be directed bythis Court at the time of final disposal of the appealand (iv) the successful party in this appeal shall beentitled to interest on the amount stayed by this Courtat such rate as may be directed at the time of finaldisposal of the appeal. It is clarified that this interim order shallapply only in the case of those members of theassociation who were petitioners before the High Courtin the writ petition giving rise to this appeal and whoshall file the requisite affidavits within theaforesaid period of four weeks from today. We furtherdirect that any default in deposit of any one of theinstalments by the dates fixed above, would result in ..4/- : 4 :vacation of this stay order and it will be open to thedepartment to recover the balance amount in accordancewith law.I.A. No. 3 for impleadment Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave towithdraw the application stating that the applicantwould file a substantive petition. Accordingly, theapplication is dismissed as not pressed. -C.A. Nos.8391-8393/2011 -Shoppers Stop Ltd. Etc. Etc. vs. Union of India & OrsEtc. Etc. Being a member of the appellant-association inC.A. No. 8390/2011, no separate orders are called forin this appeal. -C.A. No. 8397/2011 - M/s Metro Shoes Ltd. & Anr. vs.Union of Inda & Ors.C.A. No. 8398/2011 - M/s Major Brands (India) Pvt. Ltd.Vs. Union of India & Ors.C.A. No. 8428/2011 - Cinemax India ltd. Vs. Union ofIndia & Ors. Having heard learned counsel for the parties onthe question of stay with regard to the arrears ofservice tax due from the appellants prior to 30th

September, 2011, we direct as follows:(i) all the appellants in each of the appeals, whoare before us, shall deposit with the concerned ..5/- : 5 :department 50% of the arrears towards the said taxwithin six months in three equated instalments, on orbefore 1st November, 2011; 1st January 2012 and 1stMarch, 2012; (ii) for the balance 50% each of theappellant in these appeals shall furnish a solventsurety to the satisfaction of the jurisdictionalCommissioner; (iii) they shall file affidavits in thisCourt, within four weeks from today undertaking to paythe balance arrears of service tax, stayed in terms ofthis order, as may be directed by this Court at thetime of final disposal of the appeals and (iv) thesuccessful party in these appeals shall be entitled tointerest on the amount stayed by this Court at suchrate as may be directed at the time of final disposalof the appeals. It is clarified that this interim order shallapply only in the case of the appellants who shall filethe requisite affidavits within the aforesaid period offour weeks from today. We further direct that anydefault in deposit of any one of the instalments by thedates fixed above, would result in vacation of thisstay order and it will be open to the department torecover the balance amount in accordance with law. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court MasterITEM NO. 58 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27636/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WP No.3398/2010of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)HOME SOLUTIONS RETAILS (INDIA ) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 14/10/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha, ASG Mr. K. Swami, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Mr. Sumeet Sodhi, Adv. Mr. D Kumaran, Adv. Mr. Harsh Parashar, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper ..2/- : 2 : Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Issue notice on prayer for interim relief returnable within two weeks. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Permission is granted to the appellant to place on record the details of the arrears towards the service tax upto 30th September, 2011, within two weeks. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellant for recovery of arrears of service tax due on or before 30th September, 2011. We clarify that there is no stay ofimposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz)of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar asthe future liability towards service tax with

effect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

¤ITEM NO.MM-5-A COURT NO.5 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27973/2011(From the judgement and order dated 04/08/2011 in WP No.9213/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)CINEMAX INDIA LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment,permission to place addl. documents on record and prayerfor interim relief)Date: 30/09/2011 This Petition was called on in mentioning Board today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Adv. Mr. Nitin Mishra, Adv. for M/S. Khaitan & Co.,Advs.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Neeta Nagpal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on board. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. ...2/- :2: Issue notice on prayer for interim relief, returnable on 14th October, 2011. Permission is granted to the appellant to place on record the details of the arrears towards the service tax upto 30th September, 2011 within ten weeks. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellant for recovery of arrears

of service tax due on or before 30th September, 2011. We clarify that there is no stay of imposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar as the future liability towards service tax with effect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with civil appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.27245/11 and connected matter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO. MM-5C COURT NO.5 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27620/2011(From the judgement and order dated 04/08/2011 in WP No.1454/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)M/S. METRO SHOES LTD.& ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment,permission to place addl. documents on record and prayerfor interim relief)Date: 29/09/2011 This Petition was called on in Mentioning Board todayCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Ameet Naik, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Garvesh Kabra, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on board. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP Paper Book. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. ...2/- :2: Issue notice on prayer for interim relief, returnable on 14th October, 2011. Permission is granted to the appellants to place on record the details of the arrears towards the service tax upto 30th September, 2011 within two weeks. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellants for recovery of

arrears of service tax due on or before 30th September, 2011. We clarify that there is no stay of imposition of service tax under sub-clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 read with Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended), insofar as the future liability towards service tax with effect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned. Tag with civil appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.27245/11 and connected matter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master Copy of the order be given dasti.

\230ITEM NOS.MM-5A & 5B COURT NO.5 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.27245/2011(From the judgment and order dated 04/08/2011 in WPNo.2238/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)M/S RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and permission to place addl. documents on record andwith prayer for interim relief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO. 27489-27491/2011(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT AND PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDL. DOCUMENTS ON RECORD ANDWITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF)Date: 28/09/2011 These Petitions were mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rishi Agarwalla, Adv. Mr. Ameet Nayak, Adv. Ms. Hemlata Jain, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv. for Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on board. Leave granted. The appeals will be heard on the SLP Paper Books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. ...2/- :2: Issue notice on prayers for interim relief,returnable on 14th October, 2011. Permission is granted to the petitionersbefore the High Court to file individual

applications for interim relief. The applications,if any, shall be filed within two weeks. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall betaken against the said petitioners for recovery ofarrears of service tax due on or before 30thSeptember, 2011. We clarify that there is no stayof imposition of service tax under sub-clause(zzzz) of clause (105) of Section 65 read withSection 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended),insofar as the future liability towards service taxwith effect from 1st October, 2011 is concerned.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master

ÊITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2328/2011P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH SLP(C) NO. 15438-15439 of 2011SLP(C) NO. 20685 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4133 of 2011(With office report)Date: 26/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) Nos.2328,15438-15439 and 4133/2011 Deleted.SLP(C) No.20685/2011 Await for service of notice on respondent Nos.2 and3. List again on 1.12.2011. (H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARrd

ÞITEM NO.108 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2328/2011P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH SLP(C) NO. 15438-15439 of 2011SLP(C) NO. 4133 of 2011Date: 19/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath, Adv. Ms Mahima C Shroff, Adv. Mr.Chirag M.Shroff, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Prasanta Varma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Petitioner has to comply with the office reportwhereby they have to pay process fee and spare copies latestby 2.8.2011. If not paid, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamberfor non-prosecution. If paid, issue notice as per earlier order withadditional dasti service. Served respondents may file counter affidavit. List again on 26.9.2011. (S.G.SHAH) Registrarhj

èITEM NO.18 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 11261/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.15320/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)PALIWAL INFRAS.P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 18/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. No stay. Tag with SLP(C) No. 2328/2011. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\204ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 7488-7489/2011(From the judgment and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.20720/2010 & CWP No. 20724/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)M/S. A.N. TRADERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 13/05/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Chirag M.Shroff, Adv. Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Mahima C. Shroff, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. No stay. Tag with SLP(C) No. 2328 of 2011. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ÀITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2328/2011P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH SLP(C) NO. 4133 of 2011(with office report)Date: 06/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.2328/2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Heis directed to take fresh steps for confirming service of therespondent No.5 through registered post within a week's time. Service is complete as against the other respondentsbut nobody has cast appearance on their behalf. The saidrespondents may file the counter affidavit before the nextdate, in case they choose to do so.Item No.61 -2-SLP(C) No.4133/2011 Await for the return of service in respect of allthe respondents. List again on 19.7.2011. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRARrd

ÜITEM NO.37 Court No.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/04/2009 in WPC No. 325/2009of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 29/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Biswajit Bhattachharya, ASG Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Hearing expedited. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 1361 of 2011. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RENU DIWAN) Court Master Court Master

Ä 1ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10607/2010(From the judgment and order dated 02/09/2009 in CWP No.11156/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVARUN JUNEJA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 25/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Bhattacharya, ASG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. Vikas Malhotra, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is pointed out that in identical matters, this Courthas granted leave and directed for dispensing with the printingof paper book and hearing expedited. Taking notice of theaforesaid order, leave is granted in this matter also. Printingof paper book is dispensed with. Hearing expedited. The appealshall be heard on SLP paper book. 2 If pleadings have not been completed, in the meantime, itshall be open to the parties to complete the pleadings. Counteraffidavit could be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit,if any, could be filed within four weeks thereafter. Tag with CA No. 1361 of 2011. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

îITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 07/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Bhakti Pasrija,adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Respondent No.2 has been served by dasti. Vakalatnama is not seen filed. No representation also. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB

fITEM NO.20 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4133/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.16629/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)M/S BHARTI WAL-MART P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for bringing on record additional documents andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 04/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Adv. Mr. Alok Yadav, Adv. Mr. Pawan Shree Agarwal, Adv. Mr.M.P.Devanath,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. No stay. Tag with SLP(C)2328 of 2011. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

¢ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10607/2010(From the judgment and order dated 02/09/2009 in CWP No.11156/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVARUN JUNEJA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 04/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Bhattacharya, ASG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Mr. Vikas Malhotra, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R There are batch of matters involving identical issuesone of which is SLP(C) No. 13850 of 2009. Let all these matters be listed on 25th April, 2011. (NEELAM GULATI) (RENU DIWAN) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

¶ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4378/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.15735/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)M/S JDS APPARELS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSU.O.I. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 25/02/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S.Sudheer,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)No.13850 of 2009. (KUSUM SYAL) (RENU DIWAN) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

®ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2328/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No.19221/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)P.C.JEWELLER P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 04/02/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv. Mr. Niraj Singh, Adv. Ms. S. Mallick, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. No stay. (NEELAM GULATI) (MITHLESH GUPTA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ÞITEM NO.55 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10607/2010(From the judgment and order dated 02/09/2009 in CWP No.11156/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVARUN JUNEJA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 28/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Bhattacharya, ASG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Mr. Vikas Malhotra, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that hewould be placing a copy of the judgment referred to in the orderdated 26.10.2010. Let the same be filed within four weeks. (NEELAM GULATI) (RENU DIWAN) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER

$7 1ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009(From the judgement and order dated 18/04/2009 in WP No.1659/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))WITHT.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With appln. For stay and vacating stay)SLP(C) NO. 36137-36158 of 2009(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))SLP(C) NO. 36269 of 2009(With prayer for interim relief)SLP(C) NO. 36270 of 2009(With prayer for interim relief)SLP(C) NO. 2460 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief)SLP(C) NO. 4685 of 2010(With appln. For permission to file affidavit and with prayerfor interim relief)SLP(C) NO. 4316-4323 of 2010(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))Civil Appeal NO. 4486 of 2010(With office report) 2Civil Appeal NO. 4487 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 26373 of 2010(With appln. For c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refilingSLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 31324 of 2010(With appln. For c/delay in filing SLP and exemption from filingc/c of the impugned Judgment and office report)T.P.(C) NO. 236 of 2007(With appln. For directions and stay and office report)T.P.(C) NO. 630-641 of 2007(With appln. For directions and stay and office report)

T.P.(C) NO. 54-57 of 2008(With appln. For substituted service and stay)T.P.(C) NO. 451 of 2010(With office report)T.P.(C) NO. 807-821 of 2008(With appln. For stay)SLP(C) NO. 9013 of 2007(With prayer for interim relief and office report)T.P.(C) NO. 738-771 & 773-796 of 2009(With appln. For stay and office report)WITH W.P(C) NO. 147 of 2009(With appln. For interim relief and permission to fileadditional documents and office report)Date: 24/01/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE 3For Petitioner(s) Mr.R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr.Wasim A Qadri,Adv. Mr.Shalinder Saini,Adv. Mr.D.L.Chidanand,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr.Avneesh Garg,Adv. Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, Adv Mr.M.A.Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv. Mr.Chander Udai Singh Sidhu,Adv. Mr.Praveen Jain,Adv. Mr.T.S.Sidhu, Adv Mr.Mukesh Kumar,Adv. M/S. M.V. Kini & Associates Mr.Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr.Runal Tandari,Adv. Mr.Pranav Kumar Jha,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.H.N.Salve,Sr.Adv. Mr.Mukul Rohtagi,Sr.Adv. Mr.S.Ganesh,Sr.Adv. Mr.N.K.Kaul,Sr.Adv. Mr.Mahesh Agarwal,Adv.

Mr.Rishi Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr.Ameet Naik,Adv. Mr.Nakul Mohta,Adv. Mr.S.Ganesh,Sr.Adv. Mr.Tarun Gulati,Adv. Mr.Shashi Mathews,Adv. Mr.Rony John,Adv. Mr.Atul Sharma,Adv. Mr.Sarojanand Jha,Adv. Mr.M.A.Chinnasamy,Adv. 4Mr.Abhijat P.Medh, Adv.Mr.Nikhil Nayyar,Adv.Mr.T.V.S.Raghavendra Sreyas,Adv.Mr.Swapnil Verma,Adv.Mr.Sumit Goyal,Adv.Mr.M.P.Devanath, Adv.Mr.Pratap Venugopal,Adv.Ms.Surekha Ramani,Adv.Mr.P.K.Jha,Adv.Mr.Dharam Bir Raj Vohra,Adv.Mr.Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv.Dr.R.Prakash,Adv.Dr.Pooja Jha,Adv.Mr.Chirag M.Shroff,Adv.Mr.Dattatray Vyas,Adv.Mr.Navnidh Singh Arora,Adv.Mr.Ajay Aggarwal,Adv.Mr.Rajan Narain,Adv.Mr.Raghenth Basant,Adv.Ms.Liz Mathew,Adv.Mr.U.A.Rana,Adv.Ms.Mrinal Majumdar,Adv.M/S Gagrat & Co.Ms.Vanita Bhargava,Adv.Mr.Ajay Bhargava,Adv.Mr.Nitin Mishra,Adv.M/S. O.P. Khaitan & Co.Mr.M.P.Jha,Adv.Mr.Ashoka Kumar Thakur,Adv.Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,Adv.Mr.Harshvardhan Jha,Adv.Mr.Manu Nair,Adv.Mr.Arun Mohan,Adv.M/s.Suresh A.Shroff & Co. 5 Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv.

Mr.B.V.Deepak,Adv. Mr.Dili Pillai,Adv. M/S. T.T.K. Deepak & Co. Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha,Adv. Mr.S.Gour,Adv. M/S. Parekh & Co. Mrs.Roopa Dayal,Adv. Ms.Aradhana Patra,Adv. Mr.A.T.Patra,Adv. M/S.O.P. Khaitan & Co. Mr.S.Ganesh Sr.Adv. Mr.S.Sukumaran,Adv. Mr.Anand Sukumar,Adv. Mr.Bhupesh Kumar Pathak,Adv. Mr.Pradeep Aggarwal,Adv. Mr.Lal Pratap Singh,Adv. Mr.Ram Niwas,Adv. Mr.Deepam Borah,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,AdvMr.P.S.Narsimha,Sr.Adv.Mr.Sanjay R.Hegde,Adv.Mr.M.K.Shelat, Adv.Mr.Krutin Joshi,Adv.Mr.Anil Kr.Mishra,AdvMr.Sanjay R.Hegde,Adv.Mr.Krutin R.Joshi,Adv.Mr.Abhishek Malviya,Adv.Mr.G.N.Reddy,Adv.Mr.Pawan Bindra,Adv.Ms.Kavita Wadia,Adv.Ms.Kanika Agnihotri,Adv.Mr.Asim Adv.M/s.Mahalakshmi Balaji & Co.Mr.Y.Raja Gopala Rao,Adv.Mr.Subramonium Prasad,Adv.Mr.Praveen Kumar,Adv. 6 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Our attention is drawn to an order dated 12.5.2010 passedin SLP(C)....CC No. 7425 of 2010 (Now CA No. 4486 of 2010)titled Union of India & Ors. Versus UTV Software CommunicationsLtd., which is said to be a similar matter and listed with thepresent petitions. Since leave has been granted in the saidcase, leave is granted also in the present Special LeavePetitions. Printing dispensed with. All these appeals shall beheard together. Hearing expedited in all the appeals. The appeals shall beheard on the SLP paper books.

In some of the matters, pleadings are to be completed.Counter affidavit in those cases may be filed within threeweeks and rejoinder could be filed within three weeksthereafter. Transfer petitions seeking for transfer of petitionspending in the various High Courts and writ petition be re-notified after four weeks. (KUSUM SYAL) (RENU DIWAN) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

´ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 24/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Singh,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur,Adv. Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsel for the petitioner who was granted last opportunity for filing proof of dasti service regarding respondent No.2 has not filed proof even now. He seeks further time. I am not inclined to grant time since last opportunity was granted. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for appropriate orders regarding non prosecution of respondent No.2. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

æITEM NO.11 COURT NO.11 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).36269/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S MADHUR IMPEX & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 14/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Priyanka Mathur Sardana,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is allowed for compliance of office report dated 11th December, 2010, failing which the Special Leave Petition shall stand automatically dismissed. (V.K. Tiwari) (Veena Khera) P.A. Court Master

ITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 13/12/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms.Gunwant Das,adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. Mr.Shubham Bhalla,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice has been issued to Respondent No.2 by dasti as well as by post. Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks two weeks time as a last chance for filing proof of dasti. Granted. List the matter on 24.01.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB

NITEM NO.41 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10607/2010(From the judgment and order dated 02/09/2009 in CWP No.11156/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVARUN JUNEJA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 26/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Bhattacharya, ASG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Mr. Vikas Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv. Ms. July James, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that hewill get a fresh notice served on the respondents in usualcourse as well as Dasti. Re-notify after eight weeks. (NEELAM GULATI) (RENU DIWAN) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER

\210ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009(From the judgement and order dated 18/04/2009 in WP No. 1659/2008of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 18/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mohd. Mannan, Adv.for Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Nehal Agarwal, Adv.for Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay of two days in filing the process fee is condoned. (Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Sneh Lata Sharma) Court Master Court Master

\204ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010CC 16138/2010(From the judgment and order dated 03/11/2009 in WPC No.9642/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S FLAMINGO DUTY SHOPS PVT.LTD & ANR. Respondent(s)(With I.A. 1 Appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and officereport)Date: 29/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha, ASG Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delayas well as on special leave petition. Tag with SLP(C ) No. 13850 of 2009 and SLP(C ) No. 26373of 2010 (NEELAM GULATI) (RENU DIWAN) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER

hITEM NO.97 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 26/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Om Prakash,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Lokesh K. Choudhary,Adv. Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No. 2. Counsel for the petitioner seeks dasti notice in addition to the notice already issued. Granted. Take steps within four weeks. If steps taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. List the matter on 13.12.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

ìITEM NO.11 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 3 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4685/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARIKIRAT SODHI & ANR. Respondent(s)(Appln. for deletng the name of R. No.2 from the array ofparties)(With office report)Date: 08/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE (In chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mrs.N. Annapur Rani,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No.3 is allowed. The name of Respondent No.2 be deleted from the array of parties, at the risk of the applicant, as prayed for. (Shivraj Kaur) (Renu Diwan)PS to Addl.Regr. Court Master

,ITEM NO.33(CHAMBER) IN COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).4316-4323/2010(From the judgement and order dated 18/05/2009 in WPC No.715/2009 & WPC No. 828/2009 & WPC No. 847/2009 & WPC No.848/2009 & WPC No. 6830/2009 & WPC No. 7107/2009 & WPC No.7327/2009 & WPC No. 8666/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSJANAK PLACE MARKET ASSN.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 20/09/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARJIT SINGH BEDI [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.For Respondent(s) For M/S. O.P. Khaitan & Co., Advs. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing process fee is condoned. (KALYANI GUPTA) (VINOD KULVI) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

LITEM NO.74 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 07/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Prachi Bajpai,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur,Adv. Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No. 1 has already been served. Counsel for respondent No.1 submits that she does not propose to file counter affidavit. This is recorded. She further submits that this case is connected with SLP(C)No.13860/2009. Service of notice on respondent No. 2 is still awaited though it was issued on March, 2010. Counsel for the petitioner seeks fresh steps. Take steps within four weeks as a last chance by registered post. Acknowledgment due. Issue fresh notice thereafter. Await return of notice on respondent No.2. List the matter on 25.10.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

rITEM NO.12 COURT NO.14 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010CC 13452/2010(From the judgement and order dated 03/11/2009 in CWP No.7043/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With I.A. 1 Appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay inrefiling SLP and office report ))Date: 06/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation ofdelay in filing SLP and on application for condonation of delayin re-filing SLP as well as in the Special Leave Petition. Tag with SLP(C) No. 13850 of 2009. (NEELAM GULATI) (RENU DIWAN) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER

¬ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 2460 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36137-36158 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36269 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36270 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4316-4323 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 4486 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 4487 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4685 of 2010(With office report)T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With office report)Date: 01/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal Mr.Harsh Vardhan Surana,Adv. Mr.Harjeet Singh Sachdeva,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv : 2 : M/S. O.P. Khaitan & Co. Ms. Shirin Khajuria Ms. Kavita Wadia Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr.Mukesh Kumar,Adv. Ms.Shweta Mishra,Adv. Mr.Rajat Khattry,Adv. Mr.Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr/Ms Manu Suropriya,ad Mr.V.K.Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.13850/09 the case has already been listed beforethe Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber.

In SLP(C) No.36137-36158/09 Respondent No.7 has filedvakalatnama. Granted three weeks time as last chance for curingthe defects in the Vakalatnama. Respondent Nos.1, 2,3,4,6,9,11,12,13,26,27,28,29 have been served. Respondent Nos.8, 24 and 25 havealso filed vakalatnama. All the above respondents are granted fourweeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice ofRespondent Nos.5 and 13-23. In SLP(C) No.36269/09 Respondent Nos.1-3 are served. Grantedfour weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit, ifany. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted three weeks time aslast chance for curing the defects for issuing notice toRespondent No.4. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return ofnotice of Respondent No.4 In SLP(C) No.36270/09 sole respondent has been served.Granted four weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counteraffidavit. In SLP(C) No.2460/10 Respondent No.1 & 2 are served. Grantedfour weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit.Await return of notice of Respondent No.3. Contd...3 : 3 : In SLP(C) No.4685/10 it is reported to be sent for listingand hence no further order is required. In T.P.(C) No.686-707/09 await return of notice of service inT.P.(C) No.697, 703, 705/09. The remaining respondents who havebeen served and granted four weeks time for filing vakalatnama andcounter affidavit, if any as last chancel List the matter on 25.10.2010. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB

8ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 22/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No. 1 granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice in r/o respondent No. 2. List the matter on 6.9.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

x)ITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 2460 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36137-36158 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36269 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36270 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4685 of 2010(With office report)T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With office report)Date: 13/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,adv. M/S. O.P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Ms. Shirin Khajuria,Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv, Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Kunal Tandon,Adv. ...2/-Item No.49 : 2 : Mr. Shirin Khajuria,Adv. Mr. Vivek Kishore,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Sparch Bhargava,Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. M.V. Kini Associates,Adv.

Mr. Mohit Jolly,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mehndirata,Adv. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.13850/2009 respondent No. 1 has filed counter affidavit. Issue fresh notice to respondent No.2. Petitioner to take steps within two weeks. Await return of notice. Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 may file counter affidavit, if any, within three weeks from today. In SLP(C)Nos. 36137-36158/2009 served respondents may file their counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. It is submitted on behalf of respondent No. 8 that he does not propose to file counter affidavit. It is further clarified that Ms. Jyoti Mehndirata, advocate has filed Vakalatnama for respondent No.8. In SLP(C)No. 36269/2009 await return of notice. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to cure the defects against respondent No.4 within two weeks from today. Remaining respondents may file their counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. ...3/- Item No.49 : 3 : In SLP(C)No. 36270/2009 sole respondent may file Vakalatnama and counter affidavidt, if any, within four weeks. In SLP(C)No. 2460/2010 issue fresh notice to respondent No.3. The remaining respondents may file their counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. In SLP(C)No. 4685/2010 respondent No.1 may file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. Respondent No. 2 has filed an application for deletion. The application shall be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. It is submitted in view of I.A. Respondent No.2 does not propose to file counter affidavit. In T.P.(C)Nos.686-707/2009 service of notice is complete in all the matters except T.P.(C)No.697, 703, 705/2009. Await return of notice on the respondents. The Served respondents in the remaining T.Ps may file their counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. Counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 in T.P.(C) No. 2 submits that he has not received copy of the petition Counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of the pleadings within a week to the counsel for respondent No.2 . Respondent No.2 shall file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks thereafter. List the matters on 1.9.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

ºITEM NO.15+40 COURT NO.5 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 7425/2010(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in WP No. 7758/2008of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 7815 of 2010(With appln.for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 12/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.K. PRASADFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Mohan Parasaran, ASG Mr.Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Ms.Sangeeta Kumar, Adv, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Printing dispensed with. The appeals shall be heard on the SLP paper books. Additional documents, if any, may be filed by the parties. Tag with SLP © No.13850 of 2009. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Pushap Lata Bhardwaj ] Court Master Asstt.Registrar

dITEM NO.140 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5623/2010UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 07/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. M. Taiyab Khan, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has appeared. Counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed within four weeks. Await service of notice on Respondent No.2. List the matter on 22.07.2010. (Ashok Menon) RegistrarPS

.'ITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 2460 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36137-36158 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36269 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36270 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4316-4323 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4685 of 2010(With office report)T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With office report)Date: 27/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Om Parkash,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv M/S. O.P. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Ms. Shirin Khajuria,Adv. ...2/-Item No.53 : 2 : Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. Mr. B.N. Jha,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shyam D. Nandan,Adv. Mr. Sumit K. Batra,Adv. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat,Adv. Ms. Aradhana Patra,Adv. Mr. Mohit Jolly,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.

Ms. Satya Siddiqui,Adv. Mr. S.K. Mishra,Adv. Mr. Sparsh Bhargava,Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.13850/2009 respondent No. 1 has appeared and filed counter affidavit. There is no appearance for respondent No.2. Respondent No. 3 has appeared but no counter affidavit is filed. In SLP(C)No.36137-36158/2009 service of notice is complete in respect of the respondents. M/s. O.P. Khaitan & Co., Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, advocates have filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 10,24, 25 and 7 respectively. Counsel for respondent No. 7 was directed to affix the stamp of the company in the Vakalatnama. He is directed to comply with the office report. Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 have also appeared and seek time to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. The respondents who have appeared may file their counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. ...3/- Item No.53 : 3 : In SLP(C)No. 36269/2009 service of notice is complete on all the respondents except respondent No. 4. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have appeared. They may file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks as a last chance. Issue fresh notice to unserved respondent No. 1 by registered post A.D. In SLP(C)No. 36270/2009 await service of notice on the sole respondent. In SLP(C)No. 2460/2010 service of notice is complete in r/o respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but there is no appearance for them. Issue fresh notice to unserved respondent No. 3 by registered post A.D. In SLP(C)No. 4685/2010 Respondent No. 2 has appeared. He may file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks as a last chance. Respondent No. 1 has been served but there is no appearance for that respondent. Service of notice is complete in all the Transfer Petitions except in Transfer Petition(C)Nos.697, 703 and 705/2009. Await service of notice in those Transfer Petitions. List the matters on 13.7.2010. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar

æITEM NO.50 COURT NO.5 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).36270/2009UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIVYA KALRA Respondent(s)(With office report on default )Date: 12/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mrs.Gargi Khanna,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Antima Bazaz,Adv. Ms.Bina Madhavan,Adv. M/s.Lawyers Knit & Co. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted to the counsel for thepetitioner to file process fee with copy of petition foreffecting service of notice on the sole respondent. (KUSUM SYAL) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

'ITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief)WITH SLP(C) NO. 2460 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36137-36158 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36269 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36270 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4316-4323 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4685 of 2010(With office report)Date: 26/03/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Adv. Mr. Keshav Thakur, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv M/S. O.P. Khaitan & Co., Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, Adv. Ms. Aradhana Patra, Adv. ....2/-ITEM NO. 54 - 2 - UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No. 13850/2009, Respondent No.1 has appeared and filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 has also appeared. Counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed within four weeks, as a last chance. There is no appearance for Respondent No.2 though served with notice. In SLP(C) Nos. 36137-36158/2009, service of notice in

respect of the Respondents is awaited. Respondent No.7 has appeared and Mr Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate, has filed vakalatnama, which is defective for the reason that the stamp and seal of the company has not been affixed. Counsel is directed to cure the defects. Counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed by Respondent No.7 within four weeks. Respondent No.10 has appeared and filed counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 24 and 25 in SLP(C) No. 36154/2009 have already appeared and filed counter affidavits. In SLP(C) No. 36269/2009, Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have appeared, but no counter affidavit has been filed so far. They may file their counter affidavits, if any, within four weeks, as a last chance. Await service of notice on Respondent No.4. In SLP(C) No. 36270/2009, Counsel for the Petitioner ....3/- ITEM NO. 54 - 3 - was directed to comply with the Office Report and file process fee and spare copies for issuance of notice to the unserved Respondents, but since it was not complied with, the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber for non-prosecution. In SLP(C) No. 2460/2010, Service of notice to the Respondents is awaited. In SLP(C) No. 4685/2010 also service of notice is awaited. However, Ms. Kavita Wadia, Advocate, propose to appear for Respondent No.2 and seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Four weeks time granted. In SLP(C) Nos. 4316-4323/2010, Counsel for the

Petitioner is directed to comply with the Office Report regarding non-filing of process fee and spare copies in respect of issuance of notice to the unserved Respondents within two weeks, failing which the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non prosecution. Respondent No.18 therein has appeared. Counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed within four weeks. List the matters on 27.04.2010. (Ashok Menon) RegistrarPS

àITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 3163/2010)(From the judgement & order dated 02/09/2009 in CWP No.11156/2009of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVARUN JUNEJA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 12/03/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,ASG. Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Vikas Malhotra,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag the petition with S.L.P. (C) No.23805 of 2009. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ R.K. Sharma ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

"ITEM NO.78 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))SLP(C) NO. 36137-36158 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36269 of 2009(With office report)T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With office report)Date: 24/02/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms. Sunita Rani Singh,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv Ms. Shirin Khajuria,Adv. Mr. R. Prakash,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Shweta Mazumdar,Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Ms. Mahima C. Shroff,Adv. ..2/-Item No.78 : 2 : Ms. Rashmi Singh,Adv. Mr. T. Mahuipal,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Mohit Jolly,Adv. Ms. Tanya Khare,Adv. M/s. O.P.Khaitan & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await service of notice in SLP(C)No. 36137- 36158/2009 and SLP(C)No. 36269/2009. Service of notice is complete in SLP(C)No. 13850/2009. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 served. Respondent No. 2 has not appeared though

served with notice. Respondent No. 1 alone has filed counter affidavit. No counter affidavit is filed by respondent No 3. In T.P.(C)No.686-707/2009 counsel for the petitioner is directed to comply with the office report regarding non filing of process fee and non supplying of spare copies of the SLP within two weeks for issuance of notice, failing which the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for non prosecution. In case of compliance, await service of notice and the matter be listed on 26.3.2010. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar

>ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2009 CC 21151/2009(From the judgement and order dated 23/04/2009 in WPC No.325/2009of the HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUSHMA PURI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/02/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.K. PRASADFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharjee, ASG. Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as also on the prayer for interim relief. (N. ANNAPURNA) (MADHU SAXENA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 1179/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 18/05/2009 in WP No.7708/2009of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARIKIRAT SODHI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 01/02/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Bhattacharya,ASG Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Nishant Patal,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag the petition with S.L.P. (C) No.13850 of 2009. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

2ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2009(CC 21434-21441/2009)(From the judgement and order dated 18/05/2009 in WPC No.8666/2008,WPC No.715/2009,WPC No.7327/2009,WPC No.828/2009,WPC No.6830/2009,WPC No.7107/2009,WPC No.848/2009 and WPC No.847/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSJANAK PLACE MARKET ASSN.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLPs, exemption from filingc/c of the impugned order and office report)Date: 22/01/2010 These Matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourab K. Banerji,ASG. Mr. T.V. Ratnam,Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Akhil Anand,Adv. for M/s. O.P. Khaitan & Co.,Advs. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag the petitions with S.L.P. (C) No.13850 of 2009. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

ITEM NO.133 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 36137-36158 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36269 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 36270 of 2009(With office report)T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With office report)Date: 12/01/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv. ......2/- -2-Item No. 133 Mr. R. Prakash, Adv. Ms. Shweta Mazumdar, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP (C) No. 13850 of 2009 Service of notice is complete on all therespondents. There is no appearance for respondent no. 2.

Respondent no. 1 has appeared and filed counter affidavit.Respondent no. 3 has not filed any counter affidavit.SLP (C) Nos. 36137-36158 of 2009, SLP (C) No. 36269 of 2009and SLP (C) No. 36270 of 2009 Counsel for the petitioner is directed to complywith the Office Report regarding non-filing of process feeand spare copies within two weeks, failing which the matterbe listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for nonprosecution. In case of compliance, await service of therespondents.T.P. (C) Nos. 686-707 of 2009 Service of notice is complete in all matters exceptin T.P. (C) Nos. 697, 699 and 703 to 706 of 2009. Issuefresh notice to unserved respondents in these transferpetitions by registered post A.D. List the matters on 24.2.2010. (ASHOK MENON)vk Registrar

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 70/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 18/05/2009 in WP No.8005/2009of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBAJAJ JEWELS(I) P.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, stay, exemptionfrom filing c/c of the impugned order and office report)Date: 08/01/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAMFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,ASG. Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. F.A. Ayyubi,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition as also on the prayer for interim relief. Tag the petition with S.L.P. (C) No.13850 of 2009. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

@ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2009(CC 20803-20824/2009)(From the judgement and order dated 18/04/2009 in WP No.4130/2008,WP No.4131/2008, WP No.4749/2008, WP No.5036/2008, WP No.5643/2008,WP No.5976/2008, WP No.5978/2008, WP No.6033/2008, WP No.6734/2008,P No.6744/2008, WP No.6993/2008, WP No.7004/2008, WP No.7122/2008,WP No.7164/2008, WP No.7212/2008, WP No.7654/2008, WP No.7664/2008,WP No.7723/2008, WP No.7762/2008, WP No.7964/2008, WP No.8538/2008and WP No.8771/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLPs, c/delay in refilingSLPs, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and officereport)Date: 17/12/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTUFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Subramanium,SG. Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,ASg. Mr. D. Mohta,Adv. Mr. D. Mukherjee,Adv. Mr. M.P. Singh,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag the petitions with S.L.P. (C) No.13850 of 2009. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

pITEM NO.16 & 40 COURT NO.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2009 CC 20427/2009(From the judgement and order dated 18/05/2009 in CWP No.7653/2009of the HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S MADHUR IMPEX & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21083 of 2009(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 16/12/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAMFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha, ASG. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. C.V. Subba Rao, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with S.L.P.(C) No.13850 of 2009. (N. ANNAPURNA) (MADHU SAXENA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

rITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief )WITH T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 27/11/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mrs. G. Indira,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv Ms. Shirin Khajuria,Av. Mr. Adarsh Kumar, Respondent In Person UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No. 13850/2009 respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit. Respondent No. 2 has not appeared in this matter. ...2/- Item No. 84 : 2 : In T.P.(C)No.686-707/2009 Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 to 8, 10,15,17,18,19 and 26. Respondent No. 15 appears in person. He submits that he does not intend to file counter affidavit. Service of notice on the other respondents is awaited. Respondent No.10 has appeared and filed Vakalatnama. He does not intend to file counter affidavit. Await service of notice on the remaining respondents. List the matter on 11.1.2010. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar

¶ITEM NO. 62 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4220/2009(From the judgment and order dated 31/01/2009 in IA No. 1/2009 &WP No. 148/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR)M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 03/11/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTUFor Petitioner(s) Mr.A.K. Ganguli, Sr.Adv. Mr.Manoj Sharma, Adv. Mr.V.K. Munshi, Adv. Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.H.P. Rawal, ASG Ms.Madhurima Tatia, Adv. Mr.Kunal Bahri, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr.B.K. Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Ad interim order dated 27th February, 2009 is made absolute. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Pushap Lata Bhardwaj ] Court Master Court Master

\216ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief ))WITH T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 21/10/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Misra,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. TerdalFor Respondent(s) Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. A.P. Jain,Adv. Mr. LP Singh,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) 13850/2009 Service is notice is complete on all the respondents, but no counter affidavit has been filed. Respondent No.2 has not appeared.TP (C) 686-707/2009 Await service for notice on respondents in TP 686/2009. Counsel is directed to serve copy through the counsel appeared before the Trial Court. List the matters on 27.11.2009. (ASHOK MENON) Registrar AJ

ªITEM NO. 85 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4220/2009(From the judgment and order dated 31/01/2009 in IA No. 1/2009in WP No. 148/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR)M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 29/09/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTUFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.H.P. Raval, ASG Mr.Kunal Bhari, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Tatia, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr.B.K. Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.5. Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Pushap Lata Bhardwaj ] Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.133 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III SUPR EME COUR T OF I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and prayerfor interim relief )WITH T.P.(C) NO. 686-707 of 2009(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 02/09/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. N.Annapoorani ,Adv Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER In SLP(C)No.13850/2009 Service of notice is complete on the respondents. R-1 and 3 have appeared. They are directed to file counter affidavit, if any, before 21.10.2009. In T.P.(C)No.686-707/2009 the counsel for the petitioner is directed to comply with the office report regarding non filing of process fee and non supplying of spare copies of the SLP within a week for issuance of notice. Await service of notice. List the matter on 21.10.2009. (ASHOK MENON) Registrar

\212ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III SUPR EME COUR T OF I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4220/2009M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 21/08/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Counter affidavit has been filed for Respondent No.5. The counsel isdirected to supply the copy of the Counter affidavit to the counsel appearingfor the petitioner within a week. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (Ashok Menon)aa Registrar

TITEM NO.130 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III SUPR EME COUR T OF I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4220/2009(From the judgement and order dated 31/01/2009 in IA No. 1/2009 & WP No.148/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR)M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 28/07/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Sharma,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER All the respondents have appeared through counsel. No counter affidavit is filed. Counsel appearing for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit. Three weeks time is granted as a last chance. List the matter on 21.8.2009.(ASHOK MENON) Registrar

\230ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.2 SECTION III SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13850/2009(From the judgement and order dated 18/04/2009 in WP No. 1659/2008of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgmentand prayer for interim relief ))Date: 02/06/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA (Vacation Bench)For Petitioner(s) Mr.Biswajeet Bhattacharyya, Sr.Adv, Mr.Debashish Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. MPS Tomar, Adv. Ms. Pamljiro Shrivastava, Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Mukul Rohtagi, Sr.Adv. Dr.A.M. Singhvi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ameet Naik, Adv. Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr.Gaurav Goel, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Issue notice. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Indu Satija ]Court Master Court Master

,ITEM NO.121 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4220/2009M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief )Date: 14/05/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are served. There is no Vakalatanama and appearance. Fresh notice to unserved respondent No.1 by registered post A.D. List the matter on 27.7.2009. (ASHOK MENON) Registrar

,ITEM NO.97 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4220/2009M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 13/04/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Petitioner is permitted to serve the Dasti Notice of respondent No.1 through theStanding Counsel. Served respondents may file counter affidavit before 14-5-2009. List the matter on 14-5-2009. (S.G.SHAH)va Registrar

²ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.11 SECTION III SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4220/2009(From the judgement and order dated 31/01/2009 in IA No. 1/2009 in WP No.148/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR)M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 27/02/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. A.K. Ganguly, Sr.Adv. Mr. V.K. Munshi, Adv. Mr. Manoj Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Issue notice. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. In the meanwhile, respondent No.5 is restrained from taking any coercive steps to effect recovery pursuant to Circular No.98/1/2008-ST dated 4th January, 2008. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Usha Sharma] Court Master Court Master