Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2025 / Diary 10253

GURUDEV SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH PROPOSED L.R v. PREM KUMAR

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10253/2025

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

25-04-2025

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

Petitioner

GURUDEV SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH PROPOSED L.R

Respondent

PREM KUMAR

Download PDF Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

Diary No. 10253/2025 ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 10253/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-12-2024 in SA No. 694/2001 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad] GURUDEV SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH PROPOSED L.R Petitioner(s) VERSUS PREM KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 90107/2025 - APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT IA No. 90102/2025 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 90108/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS IA No. 90100/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 90101/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 90099/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE SLP. IA No. 90104/2025 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT Date : 25-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rishesh Sikarwar, Adv. Mr. Shashank Gusain, Adv. Mr. Pradeep K. Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Jha, Adv. Mr. Sahitya Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Satyanand Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anupam Kishore Sinha, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tanvir Nayar, AOR Mr. Yagyesh Kumar, Adv. 1

Diary No. 10253/2025 UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Permission to file special leave petition is granted. 2. Delay condoned. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and having gone through the materials on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. 4. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 5. In view of the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, no orders are required to be passed on the applications for setting aside abatement, condonation of delay in filing application for setting aside abatement and application for substitution, which are accordingly disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BABITA PANDEY) (POOJA SHARMA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India