ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2979/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2016 in CRLOP No. 12023/2015 passed by the High Court Of Madras At Madurai) R R SANGEETHA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHIVANATH AND ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 17/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv. Ms. Shruti Iyer,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
xITEM NO.15 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2979/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2016in CRLOP No. 12023/2015 passed by the High Court Of Madras AtMadurai)R R SANGEETHA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHIVANATH AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief)Date : 17/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv.Ms. Shruti Iyer,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard.We do not find any ground to interfere with theimpugned order. The special leave petition is,accordingly, dismissed.Pending application(s), if any, shall alsostand disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master