ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)......CC NO(S). 8269/2017 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 02/09/2016 IN FA NO. 3167/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD) UNION OF INDIA PETITIONER(S) VERSUS VIJAY KUMAR AND ANR RESPONDENT(S) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP) Date : 26/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rupinder Singh Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv Mr. Gautam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Delay condoned. Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is granted. We do not find any legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However, the questions of law are left open. [VINOD LAKHINA] COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER
˜ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)......CC NO(S).8269/2017(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 02/09/2016IN FA NO. 3167/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY ATAURANGABAD)UNION OF INDIA PETITIONER(S) VERSUSVIJAY KUMAR AND ANR RESPONDENT(S)(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP)Date : 26/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rupinder Singh Suri, Sr. Adv.Mr. Sachin Sharma, AdvMr. Gautam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingO R D E RHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner andperused the relevant material.Delay condoned.Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugnedorder is granted.We do not find any legal and valid ground forinterference. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.However, the questions of law are left open. [VINOD LAKHINA]COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI]COURT MASTER