ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....../2016 (CC No.19841/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/11/2015 in RFA No. 4401/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) MAHA RAM & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 24/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar Gaur,Adv. Mr. Ghanshyam,Adv. Ms. Punam Kumari,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Substitution allowed and the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner are allowed to file special leave petition. No ground to interfere with the impugned order is made out, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Anita Malhotra) (Chander Bala) Court Master Court Master
SECTION IV B Listed on.24.10.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.11 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 19 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.15 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioner) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.7 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO.19841 OF 2016 AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the SLP) Maha Ram (Dead) & Anr. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Ms. Punam Kumari , Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 18.3.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA NO. 4401/2015(O&M) alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution of deceased petitioner namely Maha Ram which is barred by time by 43 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application.
It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 18 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 144 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 162 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No. 2382623841/2016 Entitled RAM KALA ETC. ETC . Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC.ETC. arising out of common Order was dismissed on 8.8.2016 by Hon'ble Court. (Copy of order dated 8.8.2016 is enclosed herewith). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21st day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Punam Kumari, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj
ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....../2016(CC No.19841/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/11/2015in RFA No. 4401/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)MAHA RAM & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)Date : 24/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANTFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar Gaur,Adv.Mr. Ghanshyam,Adv.Ms. Punam Kumari,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Substitution allowed and the legalrepresentatives of the deceased petitioner are allowed tofile special leave petition.No ground to interfere with the impugned order ismade out, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article136 of the Constitution of India.The Special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.Pending application, if any, also stands disposedof. (Anita Malhotra) (Chander Bala) Court Master Court Master