Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2017 / Diary 10238

JAIPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10238/2017

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

20-03-2018

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Petitioner

JAIPAL

Respondent

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 139 of 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 440 OF 2017 JAIPAL Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) O R D E R Having carefully gone through the review petition, the order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, we are satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed. ....................J. (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN) ....................J. (SANJAY KISHAN KAUL) New Delhi, Dated: 20th March, 2018.

2 ITEM NO.1001 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(Crl.) No. 139/2018 in Crl.A. No. 440/2017 JAIPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 34340/2018 FOR ORAL HEARING ON IA 34341/2018) Date : 20-03-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL BY CIRCULATION UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SHASHI SAREEN) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 10238/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 440 OF 2017 JAIPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) Date : 23-02-2018 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amrendra Kr. Choubey,Adv. Mr. R. V. Kameshwaran, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. (KUSUM LATA SYAL) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 10238/2017 JAIPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) Date : 12-01-2018 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. V. Kameshwaran, AOR (NP) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last opportunity, four weeks' further time is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry in its office report. (KUSUM LATA SYAL) (MADHU NARULA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No.10238/2017 JAIPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) Date : 03-11-2017 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. V. Kameshwaran, AOR (NP) For Respondent(s) The Court made the following O R D E R Further three weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry. (RACHNA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Review Petition(Crl) Diary No(s). 10238/2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 440/2017 JAIPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) Date : 13-10-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. V. Kameshwaran, AOR (Not Present) For Respondent(s) The Court made the following O R D E R Three weeks' further time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry. (SONALI SAUND) (RAJINDER KAUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.13 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Diary No(s). 10238/2017 JAIPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) Date : 04-09-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amrendra Kr. Choubey,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kr. Jha,Adv. Mr. Seita Vaidialingam,Adv. Mr. R. V. Kameshwaran, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, three weeks' time is granted to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry. (SAPNA BISHT) (HARESH SINGH NEGI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India