Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2016 / Diary 10238

ARSHAD AHMED v. PUNJAB WAKF BOARD .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10238/2016

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

29-04-2016

Bench

Petitioner

ARSHAD AHMED

Respondent

PUNJAB WAKF BOARD .

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11165-11166/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/01/2016 in CR No. 3752/2005 and CR No. 5861/2006 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ARSHAD AHMED AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUNJAB WAKF BOARD AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 29/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material. We do not find any legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Asha Soni) Court Master

ยค ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11165-11166/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/01/2016 in CR No. 3752/2005 and CR No. 5861/2006 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) ARSHAD AHMED AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUNJAB WAKF BOARD AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 29/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material. We do not find any legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. (Neetu Khajuria) (Asha Soni)Signature Not Verified Sr.P.A. Court MasterDigitally signed byNEETU KHAJURIADate: 2016.05.0317:58:44 ISTReason:

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India