ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 8801/2026 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-12-2025 in CO No. 4068/2025 passed by the High Court at Calcutta] OFB TECH PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUS REAN WATERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 68977/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND IA No. 68980/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 12-03-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Muralidhar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vagisha Kochar, AOR Ms. Vishakha, Adv. Mr. Pawan Aneja, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition filed against an adjournment order. In the event there is any urgency in the matter, it is for the petitioner, OFB Tech Private Limited, to make a mention either before the learned Judge concerned or before the Hon’ble The Chief Justice of the High Court at Calcutta and seek priority in the hearing of the matter. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (BABITA PANDEY) (PREETI SAXENA) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
OFB TECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. REAN WATERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
Supreme Court of India | Diary 10233/2026
Status
ROP - of Main Case
Decided On
12-03-2026
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Petitioner
OFB TECH PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
REAN WATERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
Primary Holding
A special leave petition filed against a mere adjournment order is not maintainable before the Supreme Court, and the appropriate remedy is to seek urgent mention before the concerned court or the Chief Justice of the High Court.