Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2016 / Diary 10233

ANIL AGGARWAL v. MANOJ SHARMA

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10233/2016

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

01-10-2021

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI

Petitioner

ANIL AGGARWAL

Respondent

MANOJ SHARMA

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 PDF 7 PDF 8 PDF 9 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

1 ITEM NO.17 Court 16 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5137- 5145/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 535/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 540/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 541/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 542/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 543/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 544/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 545/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 546/2013 12-08-2015 in CRLLP No. 547/2013 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANOJ SHARMA & ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 01-10-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG Mr. Mehul Gupta, Adv. Mr. Liz Mathew, Adv. Mr. Raghuvendra Srivatsa, Adv. Ms. Praveena Gautam, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, AOR Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. For M/S. Arputham Aruna & Co., AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, AOR Mr. Rajesh Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ms. Praveena Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent no.1 has expired and the special leave petitions have become infructuous. The special leave petitions, accordingly, are dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (BABITA PANDEY) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.37 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5137-5145/2016 ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANOJ SHARMA AND ANR Respondent(s) Date : 01/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh, Adv. Mrs. Suresh Kumari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS

üITEM NO.37 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).5137-5145/2016ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANOJ SHARMA AND ANR Respondent(s)Date : 01/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh, Adv. Mrs. Suresh Kumari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit.Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2, but no onehas entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shallbe processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarPS

ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5137-5145/2016 ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANOJ SHARMA AND ANR Respondent(s) Date : 21/03/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aruna Mathur,Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham,Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Singh,Adv. Ms. Suresh Kumari,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 3.2.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.2. List again on 1.5.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

<ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5137-5145/2016ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANOJ SHARMA AND ANR Respondent(s)Date : 21/03/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aruna Mathur,Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham,Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Singh,Adv. Ms. Suresh Kumari,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the orderdated 3.2.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.2.List again on 1.5.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5137-5145/2016 ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANOJ SHARMA AND ANR Respondent(s) Date : 03/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Aruna Mathur,Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham,Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No. 2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 21.3.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

$ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5137-5145/2016ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANOJ SHARMA AND ANR Respondent(s)Date : 03/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Aruna Mathur,Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham,Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit.Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to therespondent No. 2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 21.3.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.6 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.)...... CRLMP NO(S). 10277-10285/2016 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 12/08/2015 IN CRLLP NOS.535 AND 540 TO 547 OF 2013 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI) ANIL AGGARWAL PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MANOJ SHARMA AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND C/DELAY IN REFILING SLP) Date : 08/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. for M/s Arputham Aruna & Co., Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Delay condoned. Issue notice. [VINOD LAKHINA] COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER

x ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.6 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.)...... CRLMP NO(S). 10277-10285/2016 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 12/08/2015 IN CRLLP NOS.535 AND 540 TO 547 OF 2013 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI) ANIL AGGARWAL PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MANOJ SHARMA AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND C/DELAY IN REFILING SLP) Date : 08/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. for M/s Arputham Aruna & Co., Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Delay condoned. Issue notice. [VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVINOD LAKHINADate: 2016.07.0816:16:11 ISTReason:

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India