Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2016 / Diary 10229

SUDARSHAN PURI v. PRITAM SINGH

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10229/2016

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

10-05-2016

Bench

Petitioner

SUDARSHAN PURI

Respondent

PRITAM SINGH

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12762/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/02/2016 in CR No. 403/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) SUDARSHAN PURI Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRITAM SINGH AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Pal,Adv. Mr. P.P. Nayak, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12762/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/02/2016 in CR No. 403/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) SUDARSHAN PURI Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRITAM SINGH AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Pal,Adv. Mr. P.P. Nayak, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by USHARANI BHARDWAJDate: 2016.05.1117:11:47 ISTReason:

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India