1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICATION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3171-3172 OF 2017 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION NOS.10175-10176 OF 2016) RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. These appeals are arising out of the impugned common judgment and order dated 24.03.2015 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in R.S.A No. 188 of 2013 and R.S.A. No.158 of 2014 whereby the High Court dismissed the RSA No. 188 of 2013 preferred by the appellant – Ratan Singh Vyamsala Samiti arising out of order dated 14.03.2013 passed by the Learned ADJ-05, West District, Tees Hazari Courts, Delhi in R.C.A. No. 30.13.11. Vide same judgment and order the High Court allowed the RSA No.158 of 2014 preferred by the Respondent-Delhi Development Authority arising out of order dated 09.05.2013 passed by the Learned ADJ – 05, West District, Tees Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No. 102.13.13. 4. The ADJ vide its order dated 9.5.2013, set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.05.2011 and remanded the matter back
2 to the learned Trial Court for fresh adjudication. 5. The appellant preferred a R.S.A. under Section 100 of CPC in R.S. No. No. 188 of 2013 before the High Court assailing the order dated 14.3.2013 passed by the ADJ (5). The respondent-DDA also preferred R.S.A. No. 158 of 2014 before the High Court assailing the order passed by ADJ (5) on 9.05.2013. 6. The High Court vide impugned judgment dated 24.03.2015 was pleased to allow the R.S.A No. 158/2014 preferred by the DDA against the remand order and dismissed the R.S.A. No 188 of 2013 preferred by the appellant against the order passed by the First Appellate Court reversing the findings of the Trial Court. 7. Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. We are of the opinion that the learned ADJ ought to have decided both the appeals together but he has chosen to decide only the question of permanent injunction in one appeal and remanded the case in another appeal. The learned ADJ decided the issue as to the question of declaration of title in the other appeal and remanded the matter back to the Trial Court for recording evidence. 8. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that when the issue with respect to declaration of title was framed, it was necessary to decide the question of permanent injunction along with issue of title as grant of permanent injunction may depend on that. 9. In the circumstances, we uphold the order passed by the
3 First Appellate Court remanding the matter to Trial Court and at the same time we set aside the judgment of the High Court in the appeals as well as that of First Appellate Court dismissing the appeal in regard to permanent injunction. The judgment and decree of the Trial Court is also set aside. The Trial Court shall decide the issue of injunction as well as declaration of title afresh after permitting the plaintiff to adduce additional evidence. Delhi Development Authority will also be allowed an opportunity adduce evidence. Let fresh decision be rendered by the Trial Court in accordance with law after recording evidence. Let the evidence be recorded within a period of six months. Within two months thereafter, decision may be rendered. Status quo existing as on today will be maintained till the decision of the case. The appeals are allowed, accordingly. .....................J. (ARUN MISHRA) ......................J. (AMITAVA ROY) New Delhi; FEBRUARY 23, 2017.
4 ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10175-10176/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 158/2014 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 188/2013 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 23/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv. Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)
z+1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICATIONCIVIL APPEAL NOS.3171-3172 OF 2017(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION NOS.10175-10176 OF 2016)RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s)O R D E R1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.3. These appeals are arising out of the impugned common judgmentand order dated 24.03.2015 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhiin R.S.A No. 188 of 2013 and R.S.A. No.158 of 2014 whereby theHigh Court dismissed the RSA No. 188 of 2013 preferred by theappellant ⬠Ratan Singh Vyamsala Samiti arising out of orderdated 14.03.2013 passed by the Learned ADJ-05, West District, TeesHazari Courts, Delhi in R.C.A. No. 30.13.11. Vide same judgmentand order the High Court allowed the RSA No.158 of 2014 preferredby the Respondent-Delhi Development Authority arising out of orderdated 09.05.2013 passed by the Learned ADJ ⬠05, West District,Tees Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No. 102.13.13.4. The ADJ vide its order dated 9.5.2013, set aside the judgmentand decree dated 26.05.2011 and remanded the matter back2to the learned Trial Court for fresh adjudication.5. The appellant preferred a R.S.A. under Section 100 of CPCin R.S. No. No. 188 of 2013 before the High Court assailing theorder dated 14.3.2013 passed by the ADJ (5). The respondent-DDAalso preferred R.S.A. No. 158 of 2014 before the High Courtassailing the order passed by ADJ (5) on 9.05.2013.6. The High Court vide impugned judgment dated 24.03.2015 waspleased to allow the R.S.A No. 158/2014 preferred by the DDAagainst the remand order and dismissed the R.S.A. No 188 of 2013preferred by the appellant against the order passed by the FirstAppellate Court reversing the findings of the Trial Court.7. Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. We areof the opinion that the learned ADJ ought to have decided both theappeals together but he has chosen to decide only the question ofpermanent injunction in one appeal and remanded the case inanother appeal. The learned ADJ decided the issue as to thequestion of declaration of title in the other appeal and remandedthe matter back to the Trial Court for recording evidence.8. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we find thatwhen the issue with respect to declaration of title was framed, itwas necessary to decide the question of permanent injunction alongwith issue of title as grant of permanent injunction may depend onthat.9. In the circumstances, we uphold the order passed by the3First Appellate Court remanding the matter to Trial Court and atthe same time we set aside the judgment of the High Court in theappeals as well as that of First Appellate Court dismissing theappeal in regard to permanent injunction. The judgment and decreeof the Trial Court is also set aside. The Trial Court shalldecide the issue of injunction as well as declaration of titleafresh after permitting the plaintiff to adduce additionalevidence. Delhi Development Authority will also be allowed anopportunity adduce evidence. Let fresh decision be rendered bythe Trial Court in accordance with law after recording evidence.Let the evidence be recorded within a period of six months. Withintwo months thereafter, decision may be rendered. Status quoexisting as on today will be maintained till the decision of thecase.The appeals are allowed, accordingly. .....................J. (ARUN MISHRA)
......................J. (AMITAVA ROY)New Delhi;FEBRUARY 23, 2017.4ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10175-10176/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 158/2014 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 188/2013 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 23/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv.Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeals are allowed in terms of the signedorder. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master(Signed order is placed on the file)
ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10175-10176/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 158/2014 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 188/2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (With interim relief and Office Report) Date : 27/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv. Mr. Aastha Vasistha, Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list the matters after two weeks. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master
Listed On: 27.01.2017 Court No. 9 Item No. 53 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 10175-10176 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI ... PETITIONER VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice to consider and send the matter to the first appellate Court to decide both the appeals. Parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date, until further orders." It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid Orders, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent on 02.12.2016 by registered A.D. Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama as well as counter-affidavit on behalf of the respondent and counter-affidavit has been included in SLP paper-books. Service is complete. The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. Manju Jetley, Adv. Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK-3
>ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10175-10176/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/03/2015in RSA No. 158/2014 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 188/2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s)(With interim relief and Office Report)Date : 27/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv.Mr. Aastha Vasistha, Adv.Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv.Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, list the matters after twoweeks. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master
ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manohar Pratap,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the sole respondent, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
Listed On: 07.12.2016 Ld. Registra Court Court No. 2 Item No. 52 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 10175-10176 of 2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI ... PETITIONER VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 08.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 23.09.2016 of this Court in respect of the common sole respondent. List the matter again on 07.12.2016." It is submitted that AD card duly stamped from sole respondent has been received but no one has entered appearance so far. Service is complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. Manju Jetley, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK-3
¢ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 07/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manohar Pratap,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe office report indicates that service of notice is completeon the sole respondent, but no one has entered appearance on hisbehalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 08/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 23.09.2016 of this Court in respect of the common sole respondent. List the matter again on 07.12.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
Listed On: 08.11.2016 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 89 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 10175-10176 of 2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI ... PETITIONER VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 23.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the sole respondent within four weeks. List the matter again on 08.11.2016. " It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps to serve sole Respondent (common in both SLP) so far. Service is not complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 7 th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. Manju Jetley, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK-3
xITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 08/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated23.09.2016 of this Court in respect of the common sole respondent.List the matter again on 07.12.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 23/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the sole respondent within four weeks. List the matter again on 08.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
Listed On: 23.09.2016 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 73 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 10175-10176 of 2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI ... PETITIONER VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 11.08.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List again on 23.9.2016." It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing notice to sole Respondent (common in both matters) received. Service is not complete on sole Respondent. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 22 nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. Manju Jetley, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK-3
ÆITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 23/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh stepsin respect of the sole respondent within four weeks.List the matter again on 08.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.107 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 11/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanpreet Singh Asmani,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List again on 23.9. 2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
Listed On: 11.08.2016 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 107 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10175-10176 of 2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI ... PETITIONER VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 04.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List the matter again on 11.08.2016." It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing notice to sole Respondent common in both SLPs received so far. Service is not complete on sole Respondent. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 9 th DAY OF AUGUST, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. Manju Jetley, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK-3
Ò ITEM NO.107 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 11/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanpreet Singh Asmani,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List again on 23.9.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.08.1116:27:05 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani,adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List the matter again on 11.08.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
Listed On: 04.07.2016 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 90 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10175-10176 of 2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI ... PETITIONER VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice to consider and send the matter to the first appellate Court to decide both the appeals. Parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date, until further orders." It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid Order show cause notice to sole respondent was issued on 28.04.2016. Neither A.d. Card nor unserved cover containing notice to sole respondent received. Service is not complete on sole Respondent. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 1 st DAY OF JULY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. Manju Jetley, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK-3
ð ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10175-10176/2016 RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani,adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List the matter again on 11.08.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.07.0416:09:09 TLTReason:
ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 6154-6155/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 158/2014 and RSA No. 188/2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 08/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv. Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv. Mr. Peeyush Bhatia, Adv. Mr. A.K. Azad, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice to consider and send the matter to the first appellate Court to decide both the appeals. Parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date, until further orders. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER
. ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 6154-6155/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/03/2015 in RSA No. 158/2014 and RSA No. 188/2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) RATAN SINGH VYAMSALA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 08/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv. Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv. Mr. Peeyush Bhatia, Adv. Mr. A.K. Azad, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice to consider and send the matter to the first appellate Court to decide both the appeals. Parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date, until further orders.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVINOD KUMARDate: 2016.04.08 (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA)16:56:14 ISTReason: COURT MASTER COURT MASTER