SECTION IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.) NO. 1022 OF 2015 WITH INTERIM RELIEF UMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU ...PETITIONER VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.08.2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased pass the following order: “Learned counsel for the respondentState prays for and is granted six weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. Notice to R1 is dispensed with. Post for hearing on a nonmiscellaneous day. Record of the Trial Court shall also be summoned.” It is submitted that instant matter is an after notice matter and there are two respondents in this matter. It is further submitted that showcause notice in respect of Respondent NO. 1 is dispensed with vide Court's order quoted above. It is further submitted that Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on 15.07.2015 and Counter Affidavit on 25.08.2015 on behalf of respondent no. 2. Copy of the Counter Affidavit has been included in the Special Leave Petition paper books for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that original record from the Trial Court is received and available in the Court Room for reference of the Hon'ble Court. Service of showcause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 01 st day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Binay Kumar Das, Advocate Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Advocate MR. Vishwapal Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c3
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1022/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/01/2015 in CRR No. 660/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU Petitioner(s) VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s Mr. Sanjay Malik, Adv. Mr. suraj P. Ahlawat, Adv. Mr. Suresh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Das,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jayant K. Sud, AAG Ms. Jasleen Chahal, Adv. Mr. Honey Khanna, Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, AAG Mr. Ronak K., Adv. Mr.Jai Wadhwa, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv. Ms. Naresh Bakshi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed.Signature Not Verified (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher)Digitally signed byGULSHAN KUMARARORADate: 2016.07.06 Court Master Court Master14:51:40 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Diary No(s). 1022/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/09/2014 in CRMM No. 15215/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) AVTAR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA THR. SHO POLICE STATION PANCHKULA Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 03/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel Mr. Gopal Singh Chauhan appears and states that he has no instruction. Consequently, the special leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Neeta) (Suman Jain) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Diary No(s). 1022/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/09/2014 in CRMM No. 15215/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) AVTAR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA THR. SHO POLICE STATION PANCHKULA Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 03/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel Mr. Gopal Singh Chauhan appears and states that he has no instruction. Consequently, the special leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.Signature Not Verified (Neeta) (Suman Jain)Digitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.11.04 Sr. P.A. Court Master16:17:48 ISTReason:
SECTION IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.) NO. 1022 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 2066 & 2067 OF 2015 (Application for Exemption from filing Official Translation and Exemption from filing Certified Copy of Impunged Order ) UMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU ...PETITIONER VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ANR. ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.07.2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased pass the following order: “No one appears for the petitioner, post again after four weeks.” It is submitted that instant matter is an after notice matter and there are two respondents in this matter. It is further submitted that showcause notice in respect of Respondent NO. 1 is complete and a letter dated 09.04.2015 has been received from Registrar General of High Court of Punjab and Haryana/Respondent No. 1, wherein it has been stated that no counsel has been engaged since no contestable interest of the High Court i s involved. Copy of the letter dated 09.04.2015 is included in the Special Leave Petition Paper Books for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Advocate has on 15.07.2015 filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2. Service of showcause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 13 th day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Binay Kumar Das, Advocate Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c3
ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1022/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/01/2015 in CRR No. 660/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) UMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU Petitioner(s) VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA and anr. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Malik, Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Das,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Jayant K.Sud, AAG, Ms. Jasleen Chahal, Adv. Mr. Ajay P.Tushir, Adv. Ms. Naresh Bakshi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondent- State prays for and is granted six weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. Notice to R-1 is dispensed with. Post for hearing on a non-miscellaneous day. Record of the Trial Court shall also be summoned. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master
SECTION IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.) NO. 1022 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 2066 & 2067 OF 2015 (Application for Exemption from filing Official Translation and Exemption from filing Certified Copy of Impunged Order ) UMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU ...PETITIONER VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ANR. ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30.03.2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased pass the following order: “Heard. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Haryana, submits that the State of Haryana has been wrongly impleaded as party respondent in these proceedings as the case pertains to the State of Punjab. No one appears for the petitioner. Keeping in view the submission made at Bar, we direct addition of State of Punjab as party respondent to this special leave petition instead of State of Haryana. The petitioner to amend the cause title accordingly. Notice shall issue to the newly added respondentState of Punjab, returnable within six weeks.” It is submitted the in compliance of the Court's Order quoted above, Counsel for the petitioner has on 15.4.2015 filed amended memo of parties impleading 'State of Punjab' as Respondent No. 2 instead of 'State of Haryana'. Copy of the amended memo of parties has been included in the Special Leave Petition Paper Books for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court.
It is further submitted that Show Cause Notice returnable on 06.07.2015 was issued to newly added respondent No. 2/State of Punjab, through Regd. A.D. Post. It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved envelope containing notice has been received back from the newly added respondent No. 2/State of Punjab so far. It is further submitted that instant matter is an after notice matter and there are two respondents in this matter. It is further submitted that showcause notice in respect of Respondent NO. 1 is complete and a letter dated 09.04.2015 has been received from Registrar General of High Court of Punjab and Haryana Respondent No. 1, wherein it has been stated that no counsel has been engaged since no contestable interest of the High Court is involved. Copy of the letter dated 09.04.2015 is enclosed herewith for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. Service of showcause notice is incomplete in respect of Respondent No. 2/State of Punjab. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 10 th day of July, 2015 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Binay Kumar Das, Advocate *Mr. Kuldip Singh, Standing Counsel for the State of Punjab * You are requested to file V akalatnama/appearance on behalf of State of Punjab. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c3
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1022/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/01/2015 in CRR No. 660/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) UMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU Petitioner(s) VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA and anr. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 13/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Binay Kumar Das,Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv. T he Court made the following O R D E R No one appears for the petitioner, post again after four weeks. (Mahabir Singh) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1022/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/01/2015 in CRR No. 660/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) UMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTU Petitioner(s) VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA and Anr. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 30/03/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Binay Kumar Das,Adv. (Not present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,AAG Ms. Kiran Ahlawal,Adv. Mr. Ashwani Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Haryana, submits that the State of Haryana has been wrongly impleaded as party respondent in these proceedings as the case pertains to the State of Punjab. No one appears for the petitioner. Keeping in view the submission made at Bar, we direct addition of State of Punjab as party respondent to this special leave petition instead of State of Haryana. The petitioner to amend the cause title accordingly. Notice shall issue to the newly added respondent-State of Punjab, returnable within six weeks. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
MATTER FOR : 16.03.2015 COURT NO. ITEM NO. SECTIONXV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS.1022/2015, 3173/2015, 3172/2013, 3167/2015 and 1023/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MOHD. ISRAR HAJI ...RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS The matters abovementioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.01.2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned. Issue Notice. There shall be an interim stay in so far as it relates to grant of arrears as per the order of the learned single Judge dated 06.08.2013. The petitioners shall, however, pay regular pay scale to the respondents herein from the month of January, 2015 and report compliance. Subject to the compliance of the said condition, interim stay will continue to operate. Tag with SLP (C) No. 20025/2011.” It is submitted that Hon'ble Court was directed to tag the matters abovementioned with SLP (C) No. 20025 of 2011 but the said SLP with other connected matters were dismissed by this Hon'ble Court on 21.01.2015. Copy of record of proceeding is enclosed herewith. The office report for directions is listed before the Hon'ble Court. Dated this the 13 th March, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv. A394, Defence Colony, New Delhi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1/KS/FRESH OR
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.7 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1022/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/05/2014 in WA No. 1113/2013 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Indore) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHD. ISRAR HAJI Respondent(s) (office report for direction) WITH SLP(C) No. 3173/2015 (With Office Report for Direction) SLP(C) No. 3172/2015 (With Office Report for Direction) SLP(C) No. 3167/2015 (With Office Report for Direction) SLP(C) No. 1023/2015 (With Office Report for Direction) Date : 16/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. Ms. Sakshi kakkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anilendra Pandey,Adv. Mr. Madhusudan,Adv. Mr. N.N. Jha,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In the light of the subsequent orders passed by a 3-Judge 1
Bench of this Court, by which the batch connected with the very same issue having been dismissed on 21.1.2015 with the specific direction to the State Government to implement the order(s) passed by the High Court within eight months' time, with a further observation that if the State fail to implement the order(s), the respondent would be at liberty to approach this Court by way of filing contempt petition(s), these special leave petitions cannot be entertained. In these special leave petitions the very same issue is involved. Following that order dated 21.01.2015, these special leave petitions are dismissed. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2