Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2015 / Diary 10218

SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER v. SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10218/2015

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

20-01-2026

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

Petitioner

SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER

Respondent

SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE .

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 PDF 7 PDF 8 PDF 9 PDF 10 PDF 11 PDF 12 PDF 13 PDF 14 PDF 15 PDF 16 PDF 17 PDF 18 PDF 19 PDF 20 PDF 21 PDF 22 PDF 23 PDF 24 PDF 25 PDF 26 PDF 27 PDF 28 PDF 29 PDF 30 PDF 31 PDF 32 PDF 33 PDF 34 PDF 35 PDF 36 PDF 37 PDF 38 PDF 39 PDF 40 PDF 41 PDF 42 PDF 43 PDF 44 PDF 45 PDF 46 PDF 47 PDF 48 PDF 49 PDF 50 PDF 51 PDF 52 PDF 53 PDF 54 PDF 55 PDF 56 PDF 57 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

1 ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad] APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 14213/2019 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 14214/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No.14215/2019 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) Date : 20-01-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR For Petitioner(s) :Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Ankur Sarodikar, Adv. Mr. Mayur P. Soovarkar, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Ankur Sarodikar, Adv. Mr. Mayur P. Soovarkar, Adv. Mr. Samrat Krishnarao Shinde, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. By way of last indulgence one month’s time is granted to file

2 counter affidavit. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. 2. In case the counter is not filed, the petitions may be heard without counter. 3. List on 24.03.2026. (GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR) DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 6559-6560/2015 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad] APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 14213/2019 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No. 14214/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No. 14215/2019 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) Date : 22-07-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI For parties : Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. Samrat Krishnarao Shinde, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1) As prayed, counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. 2) Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. 3) List after six weeks. (NIDHI AHUJA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1

1 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad] APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 14213/2019 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 14214/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No.14215/2019 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) Date : 07-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Mr. Aswathaman, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. Vasudev Sharan Swain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Mr. Aswathaman, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. Vasudev Sharan Swain, Adv.

2 Mr. Samrat Krishnarao Shinde, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Learned counsel for the respondents are permitted to file the counter affidavit within three weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. 2. List after five weeks. (GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 14213/2019 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No. 14214/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No. 14215/2019 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) Date : 17-01-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Samrat Krishnarao Shinde, Adv. 1

SLP (C) Nos. 6559-6560/2015 etc. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Raavi Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned.  Abatement is set aside.  Application for substitution for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased petitioner No.1 is allowed.  Amended cause title be filed.  Re­list the matter after three weeks.  (NIDHI AHUJA) (VIRENDER SINGH) AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER 2

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) Date : 11-10-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN For the parties: Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudharkar Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Samrat K. Shinde, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhagla, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, matters are adjourned. List after four weeks. (NEELAM GULATI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.7 Court 7 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 with CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 Date : 15-09-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI For the parties: Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Nandkumar N.Deshmukh,Adv. Ms. Manjeet Kirpal,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects in the application for substitution to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1. List after four weeks. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.11 Court 10 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & Anr. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) Date : 24-02-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For the parties: Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks for and is granted four weeks’ time to cure the defect pointed out by the Registry in the application for substitution to bring the Lrs. of the Petitioner No.1, on record. (NEELAM GULATI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) (I. A. No.12000/2018- APPLICATION FOR DELETION OF THE RES. NO. 3 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES) Date : 25-04-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA Counsel for parties Mr. Sandeep Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List in the last week of July, 2019. Fresh list of dates be filed, independent for each petitioner. In the meantime, the proceedings before the Labour Court shall remain stayed. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) (I. A. No.12000/2018- APPLICATION FOR DELETION OF THE RES. NO. 3 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES) Date : 05-04-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep S. Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Vasim Siddiqui, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR M/s Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Nishant Katneshwarkar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List in the last week of April, 2019 on a non-miscellaneous day. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) (I. A. No.12000/2018- APPLICATION FOR DELETION OF THE RES. NO. 3 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES) Date : 01-03-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For the parties Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal,Adv. Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande,Adv. Mr. Nishant R. Katneswarkar,Adv. Mr. Mohit Gautam,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, list after a week. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) (I. A. No.12000/2018- APPLICATION FOR DELETION OF THE RES. NO. 3 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES) Date : 28-01-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For the parties Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal,Adv. For Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeking adjournment. As prayed, list after a week. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 11-09-2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) (I. A. No.12000/2018- APPLICATION FOR DELETION OF THE RES. NO. 3 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES) Date : 04-01-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For the parties Mr. Sandeep S. Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mrs. Manjeet Kirpal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By way of last opportunity, four weeks’ time is granted for filing necessary application for substitution. List in the next month. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.68 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2014 in WP No.1004/2000 with CA No.5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No.13417/2015 (IX) - (With appln.(s) for deletion of Respondent NO.3 from the array of parties) Date : 16-07-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Deshmukh,Adv. in SLP(C)6559-60 Mr. Nar Hari Singh,AOR in SLP(C)13417 Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, AOR & resp Mr. Shakti Pandey,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is stated by Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, learned counsel, that Petitioner No.1 in his case, has died. He prays for some time to file substitution application in this regard. Appropriate application be filed before the next date of hearing. List in the 2nd week of August, 2018. (Sarita Purohit) (Jagdish Chander) Court master Branch Officer

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 12000/2018 (APPLICATION FOR DELETION OF RES. NO. 3 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES) IN Connected Case SLP(C) No.13417/2015 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE CHAMBER JUDGE. WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (IX) (I. A. No.12000/2018- APPLICATION FOR DELETION OF THE RES. NO. 3 FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES IS TO BE BE LISTED BEFORE CHAMBER JUDGE.) Date : 14-05-2018 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. Sandeep S. Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Raghavendra Tripathi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shakti Pandey, Adv. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I. A. No.12000/2018 in SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 Application for deletion of respondent no.3 is allowed at the risk of the petitioner(s). Cause title be amended accordingly. In view of the aforesaid order, payment of cost is dispensed with. (SONALI SAUND) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 08/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Shakti Pandey,Adv. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Vide Order dated 28.03.2017, Ld.counsel for the petitioner was granted opportunity for taking steps for effecting service of respondent No.3, but no such steps undertaken as of now. However, I am inclined to grant four more weeks time subject to the condition that he takes steps and deposits a sum of Rs. 1000/- in the Supreme Court Employees Mutual Welfare Fund as cost within the above period. If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If steps are taken, issue notice and list the matter on 8.08.2017 before this Court. (SANJAY PARIHAR) Registrar SB

MATTER FOR:08.05.2017                       COURT NO.R­2                  ITEM NO.24 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13417/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL   ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 28.3.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Respondent No. 1 has already stated that he does not wish to file the counter affidavit.  Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 2 and 4 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.  As per postal tracking report notice issued to the respondent No. 3 has been received back with postal remarks “Insufficient Address”. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.  List again on 8.5.2017 .” It is submitted that Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 2 and 4 but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps and also not filed fresh particulars and spare copy for service of notice in respect of respondent No. 3. Hence show cause notice could not be issued so far. Service is Incomplete on respondents No. 3.

T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 05 th  day of May, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Nar Hari Singh , Adv.   2. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, Adv.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

ÒITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHARPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 08/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Shakti Pandey,Adv. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RVide Order dated 28.03.2017, Ld.counsel for the petitioner wasgranted opportunity for taking steps for effecting service ofrespondent No.3, but no such steps undertaken as of now. However, Iam inclined to grant four more weeks time subject to the conditionthat he takes steps and deposits a sum of Rs. 1000/- in the SupremeCourt Employees Mutual Welfare Fund as cost within the aboveperiod. If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matterbefore the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If stepsare taken, issue notice and list the matter on 8.08.2017 beforethis Court. (SANJAY PARIHAR) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 28/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has already stated that he does not wish to file the counter affidavit. S ervice of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 2 and 4 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per postal tracking report notice issued to the respondent No.3 has been received back with postal remarks “Insufficient Address”. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List again on 8.5.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

MATTER FOR:28.03.2017                       COURT NO.R­2                  ITEM NO.25 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13417/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL   ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 05.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent Nos. 2­4 despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter.” It is submitted that despite several opportunities given by the Ld. Registrar Court, the counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos. 2­4 within the stipulated time. However, he has on 25.1.2017 filed spare copies of SLP for issuance of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 2­4, which is barred by time by 37 days, but he has not filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the same. The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­Chambers on 6.2.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Delay in filing the spare copy is condoned. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is permitted to serve notice on the counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 4 in connected SLP(C) Nos. 6559­6560 of 2015.”

It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 14.2.2017 filed proof of service after effecting service on Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, Advocate who is representing for respondent Nos. 2 and 4 in SLP (C) Nos. 6559­6560/2015. Notice was issued to unserved respondent No. 3 on 22.2.2017 by  registered  AD  Post. As  per  Track Report, shows that  Item delivered at New Delhi GPO. Service is not complete on respondents No. 3. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 24 th  day of March, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Nar Hari Singh , Adv.   2. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, Adv.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report) Date : 28/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent No.1 has already stated that he does not wish tofile the counter affidavit.S ervice of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 2 and 4 butno one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per postal tracking report notice issued to the respondentNo.3 has been received back with postal remarks ⬠SInsufficientAddress⬠\235. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall within aperiod of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the saidrespondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service ofnotice to him within the same period. List again on 8.5.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 06/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,AOR Mr. Shakti Pandey, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing the spare copy is condoned. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is permitted to serve notice on the counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 4 in connected SLP(c) Nos. 6559-6560 of 2015. (SONALI SAUND) (CHANDER BALA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

Chamber Matter MATTER FOR :                                                  COURT NO.                  ITEM NO. SECTION ­ XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13417 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUCIL                        PETITIONER                 VERSUS  SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.                    RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT       The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 05.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order. “Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent Nos.2­4 despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter.”      It is submitted that despite several opportunities given by the Ld. Registrar Court, the counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos. 2­4 within the stipulated time.  However, he has on 25.1.2017 filed spare copies of SLP for issuance of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 2­4, which is barred by time by 37 days, but he has not filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the same.    Hence, the office report on default in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­Chamber .  Dated this the 27 th  day of January, 2017.                                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:1.   Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Adv.    2.  Mr. M. Y. Deshmukhqw, Adv.                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

hITEM NO.34 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014in WP No. 1004/2000 passed by the High Court Of Bombay AtAurangabad)SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 06/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,AORMr. Shakti Pandey, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay in filing the spare copy is condoned. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is permitted toserve notice on the counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 4in connected SLP(c) Nos. 6559-6560 of 2015. (SONALI SAUND) (CHANDER BALA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 05/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent Nos.2-4 despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

MATTER FOR:05.01.2017                COURT NO.R­2                     ITEM NO.27 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13417/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL   ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 21.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Four weeks time, as last chance for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 17.10.2016 of this Court in respect of respondent Nos. 2 to 4. List again on 5.01.2017.” It is submitted that Advocate for the petitioner has  not taken fresh steps for service on respondent Nos. 2­4. Service on respondent No. 5 is complete by AD card but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Service is Incomplete on respondents Nos. 2 to 4. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 04 th  day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Nar Hari Singh , Adv.   2. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, Adv.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

æITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 05/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh stepsin the respect of the respondent Nos.2-4 despite opportunitiesgiven. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing beforethe Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await ordersand list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 21/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 17.10.2016 of this Court in respect of respondent Nos. 2 to 4. List again on 5.01.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

MATTER FOR:21.11.2016                       COURT NO.R­2                  ITEM NO.42 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13417/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL    ...PETITIONER                                VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.      ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 17.10.2016, when the following order was passed:­  “Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall be taken by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks.  List again on 21.11.2016. ” It is submitted that Advocate for the Petitioner has not taken fresh steps for service on respondent Nos. 2­4. Service on respondent No. 5 is complete by AD Card but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.   Service is incomplete in respect of respondent Nos. 2­4. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar's  Court with this office report. Dated this the 18 th  day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, A dv.   2. Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, Adv.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/SH/OR

ÚITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 13417/2015SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 21/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the orderdated 17.10.2016 of this Court in respect of respondent Nos. 2 to4. List again on 5.01.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 17/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Shakti Pandey, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 21.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS

MATTER FOR:17.10.2016                       COURT NO.R­2                  ITEM NO.48 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13417/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL   ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 31.8.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has already stated that he does not wish to file the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 . Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. List again on 17.10.2016.” It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this matter. The Advocate for respondent No. 1 does not wish to file Counter Affidavit as per Record of Proceeding dated 31.08.2016 of Ld. Registrar Court. Service on Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 is still awaited. Service on Respondent No. 5 is complete by AD Card. None has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Service is Incomplete on respondents Nos. 2 to 4. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 7 th  day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Nar Hari Singh , Adv.   2. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, Adv.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

\204ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 17/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Shakti Pandey, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall be taken by the Ld.counselfor the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 21.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarPS

ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 31/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has already stated that he does not wish to file the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos 2 to 4. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. List again on 17.10. 2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

MATTER FOR:31.08.2016                       COURT NO.R­2                  ITEM NO.48 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13417/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL   ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 20.7.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed the requisites after the period prescribed for such filing. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld. Counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned, and, accordingly, notice shall be issued to the respondent Nos. 2­4 with utmost dispatch. List the matter again on 31.8.2016 .” It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this matter. The Advocate for respondent No. 1 has been declined to file counter affidavit, in view of order dated 26.4.2016 of Ld. Registrar court. Fresh notice was issued on 26.7.2016 to respondent Nos. 2­4 by registered AD Post, but neither AD Cards nor unserved covers have been received from them and none has entered appearance on their behalf. Service on respondent No. 5 is complete by AD card, but none has entered appearance on his behalf. Service is Incomplete on respondents Nos. 2­4. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 30 th  day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Nar Hari Singh , Adv.   2. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, Adv.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

\ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 31/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has already stated that hedoes not wish to file the counter affidavit.Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent Nos 2 to 4.Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5 but noone has entered appearance on his behalf. List again on 17.10. 2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 20/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed the requisites after the period prescribed for such filing. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld.counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned, and, accordingly, notice shall be issued to the respondent Nos.2-4 with utmost dispatch. List the matter again on 31.08.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

MATTER FOR: 20.07.2016              COURT NO. R­2                        ITEM NO.42 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR  SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     13417/2015      WITH         PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF         SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL        ...PETITIONER                            VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.      ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 26.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ SLP(C) No. 13417/2015  The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No. 5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.  Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 3.3.2016 of this Court in respect of respondent Nos. 2 to 4. List again on 20.7.2016. ” It is submitted that there are total 5 respondents in this matter. Advocate for respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit. The advocate for the petitioner has on 5.7.2016 filed spare copies of SLP for issue of fresh notice to respondent Nos. 2­4, which is barred by time by 42 days and he has not filed application for condonation of delay in filing spare copies of SLP. So fresh notice to said respondents could not be issued. Service on respondent No. 5 is complete by AD but none has entered appearance on his behalf.  Service is Incomplete on respondent Nos. 2­4. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 19 th  day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:    1.  Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Adv.        2.   Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13417/2015 SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 20/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed the requisites after the period prescribed for such filing. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld.counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned, and, accordingly, notice shall be issued to the respondent Nos.2-4 with utmost dispatch. List the matter again on 31.08.2016.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.07.2016:19:27 TLTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

Item No. 52 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 Office Report) Date : 26/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos. 6559-6560/2015 The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been deleted vide order dated 30.7.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No.4 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.

Item No. 52 2 SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 3.3.2016 of this Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. List again on 20.7.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

MATTER FOR 26.04.2016                   COURT NO.R­2           ITEM NO.52  SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 6559­6560 AND 13417    /2015      WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF         APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR.   ...PETITIONERS                            VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 03.03.2016, Copy Of The Record Of Proceedings dated 03.03.2016 is enclosed herewith. SLP(C) Nos. 6559­6560/2015 It is submitted that there were orignally 4 respondents in this matter. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit. Names of respondent Nos. 2­3 have been deleted vide order dated 30.07.2015 of Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Service on respondent No. 4 is complete by AD Card but none has entered appearance on his behalf. Service is Complete. SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this matter. Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.1 has not filed counter affidavit. The Advocate for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps for service on respondent Nos. 2­4. Service on respondent No. 5 is complete by AD Card but none has entered appearance on his behalf.  Service is incomplete on respondent Nos. 2­4.  The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 25 th  day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:    1.   Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh,  Adv.   2.   Mr. Nar Hari Singh , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

Item No. 52 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 Office Report) Date : 26/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos. 6559-6560/2015 The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been deleted vide order dated 30.7.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Service of notice isSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu Grover complete on the respondent No.4 but no one has entered appearanceDate: 2016.04.2709:45:35 SCTReason: on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.Item No. 52 2SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the

counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5 but no one hasentered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the orderdated 3.3.2016 of this Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. List again on 20.7.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 03/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.6559-6560/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.1 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.4, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent Nos.2 & 3 have been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 30.07.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber.

ITEM NO.47 -2- SC 6559-6560/2015 SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.1 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos.2,3 & 4 within four weeks. List the matter again on 26.04.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

MATTER FOR 03.03.2016                   COURT NO.R­2           ITEM NO. 47 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 6559­6560/2015 AND 13417/2015      WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF         APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR.   ...PETITIONERS                            VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.07.2015, when he was pleased to pass the following order: “Notice shall be issued to the respondent No.4 with utmost dispatch. Respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for deletion of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 from the array of the parties.  The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await ordes. List thereafter.” SLP(C) Nos. 6559­6560/2015 It is submitted that there are 4 respondents in this matter. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. Fresh notice has issued on 24.07.2015 to respondent No. 4 by registered AD. AD Card duly signed has been received from him but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Names of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been deleted from array of parties in pursuance of order dated 30.07.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge­in­Chamber.  Service is Complete. Contd...

­2­ SLP(C) NO. 13417/2015 It is submitted that in pursuance of Court's order dated 27.04.2015 the instant matter has been tagged with SLP(C) Nos. 6559­6560/2015 and Show Cause Notice was issued to all the 5 respondents on 02.05.2015 by registered AD. Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1, but he has not filed counter affidavit. AD Card duly signed has been received from respondent No. 5 but none has entered appearance on his behalf. Neither AD Cards nor unserved covers have been received from respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 and no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Service is incomplete on respondent Nos. 2­4. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 02 nd  day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1.   Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh,  Adv.   2.   Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

> ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 03/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.6559-6560/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.1Signature Not Verified to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on theDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.03.03 respondent No.4, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The16:51:45 TLTReason: respondent Nos.2 & 3 have been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 30.07.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber.ITEM NO.47 -2- SC 6559-6560/2015SLP(C) No. 13417/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.1to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on therespondent No.5, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps inrespect of respondent Nos.2,3 & 4 within four weeks. List the matter again on 26.04.2016.

(M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-8/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000, CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondent and office report) Date : 30/07/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 7-8/2015 for deletion of the names of respondent nos. 2 and 3 are allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks from today. (Rachna) (Renu Diwan) Sr. P.A. Court Master

MATTER FOR 31.07.2015            COURT NO. 9         ITEM NO. 11 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 6559­60 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR.    ...PETITIONERS                             VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS         ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.03.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order ­ “In view of the letter circulated by Advocate­on­Record for the petitioners seeking adjournment for filing the additional documents, these matters are adjourned for six weeks.” It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed additional documents so far. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 15 th  day of April, 2015.        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, Adv.      167, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase­1, New Delhi             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

: ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-8/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000, CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondent and office report) Date : 30/07/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 7-8/2015 for deletion of the names of respondent nos. 2 and 3 are allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks from today.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.08.0112:33:47 ISTReason: (Rachna) (Renu Diwan) Sr. P.A. Court Master

ITEM NO.95 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent and interim relief and office report) Date : 16/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice shall be issued to the respondent No. 4 with utmost dispatch. Respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for deletion of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 from the array of the parties. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

Ø ITEM NO.95 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent and interim relief and office report) Date : 16/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice shall be issued to the respondent No. 4 with utmost dispatch. Respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for deletion of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 from the array of the parties. The said applicationSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu Grover shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in ChambersDate: 2015.07.2015:42:31 SCTReason: for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.8 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) NO......./2015 CC No.7522/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 27/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Desmukh, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) Nos.6559-6560 of 2015. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

° ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.8 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) NO......./2015 CC No.7522/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 27/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Desmukh, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) Nos.6559-6560 of 2015. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.04.2816:43:54 ISTReason:

MATTER FOR                    COURT NO.                        ITEM NO. SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1    (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN   CC NO. 7522 PF 2015 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.           WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL      ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS SUNIL KASHINATH GHODAKE & ORS.         ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The  petition above mentioned has been filed on 27.03.2015 against the Judgment and Order dated 11.09.2014 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad in Writ Petition No. 1004 of 2000. It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed application for condonation of delay in filing SLP which is barred by time by 107 days.  It is submitted that SLP (C) Nos. 6559­6560 of 2015 arising out of same Judgment were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.03.2015 when the Hon'ble court was pleased to adjourned the same. Copy of Record of Proceedings dated 09.03.2015 is enclosed for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 23 rd  day of April, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1.  Mr. Narhari Singh, Adv.  59, Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 with CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 20/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) For RR-1 Mr. Rajinder Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Deshmukh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-Shrigonda Municipal Council accepts notice on its behalf and seeks time to file counter affidavit. Six weeks' time, as prayed for, is granted for filing counter affidavit. Let notice be issued to other respondents. [VEENA LAKHINA ] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.

MATTER FOR 20.04.2015            COURT NO. 10          ITEM NO. 50 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 6559­60 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR.    ...PETITIONERS                             VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS         ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.03.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order ­ “In view of the letter circulated by Advocate­on­Record for the petitioners seeking adjournment for filing the additional documents, these matters are adjourned for six weeks.” It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed additional documents so far. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 15 th  day of April, 2015.        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, Adv.      167, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase­1, New Delhi             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

\212 ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000 with CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 20/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) For RR-1 Mr. Rajinder Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Deshmukh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-Shrigonda Municipal Council accepts notice on its behalf and seeks time to file counter affidavit. Six weeks' time, as prayed for, is granted for filing counter affidavit. Let notice be issued to other respondents.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2015.04.2217:07:48 ISTReason: [VEENA LAKHINA] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000,11/09/2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 09/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by Advocate-on-Record for the petitioners seeking adjournment for filing the additional documents, these matters are adjourned for six weeks. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

\204 ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.6559-6560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in WP No. 1004/2000,11/09/2014 in CA No. 5755/2005 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) APPA RANGNATH SUDAGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHRIGONDA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 09/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by Advocate-on-Record for the petitioners seeking adjournment for filing the additional documents, these matters are adjourned for six weeks. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.03.1109:49:27 ISTReason:

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India