T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. v. C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS.

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.11 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15720/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-11-2014 in SA No.396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 17474/2019 - GRANT OF INJUNCTION) Date : 26-11-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.Nagamuthu,Sr.Adv. Mr. M.P.Parthiban, AOR Mr. A.S.Vairawan,Adv. Mr. S.Sudhakaran,Adv. Mr. Hardik Gautham,Adv. For Respondent(s) Me. Nidesh Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mr. K.Pandey,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Shaz Khan,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Singh,Adv. Mr. Japneet Kaur,Adv. Ms. Vriti Gujral,Adv. Mr. Nidhi Gupta,Adv. Mr. C.Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. M.Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Mr. L.Enin Rajasekhar,Adv. Ms. A.Jaswanthi,Adv. Mr. K.V.Vijayakumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The special leave petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (B.Parvathi) (Anand Prakash) Court Master Court Master

1 ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.11 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-11-2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 17474/2019 - GRANT OF INJUNCTION) Date : 22-10-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR Mr. A.S. Vairawan, Adv. Mr. R. Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. Hardik Gautam, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Ms. Pallavi Singh, adv. Mr. K. Pandey, Adv. Mr. Shooz khan, Adv. Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Mr. A. Lenin Rajasehar, Adv. Ms. Purbita Mitra, Adv. Ms. A. Jaswanthi, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, list on 26 th November, 2019. (NEELAM GULATI) (SUNIL KUMAR RAJVANSHI) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.9 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15720/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-11- 2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No. 17474/2019 - GRANT OF INJUNCTION) Date : 15-10-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mohd. Shaz Khan, Adv. Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Adv. Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Ms. Purbitaa Mitra, Adv. Ms. A. Jaswanthi, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking adjournment due to personal difficulty, list the matter on 22.10.2019. (GEETA AHUJA) (SUNIL KUMAR RAJVANSHI) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.12 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-11- 2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No. 17474/2019 - GRANT OF INJUNCTION) Date : 26-07-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR Mr. A.S. Variawan, Adv. Mr. R. Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. Hardik Gautam, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mr. Mohd Shaz Khan, Adv. Ms. Pallavi, Adv. Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Mrs. G. Chitrakala, Adv. Purbita Mitra, Adv. Jaswanthi, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 15 th October, 2019. (GEETA AHUJA) (SUNIL KUMAR RAJVANSHI) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.12 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15720/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-11-2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 04-07-2019 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR (MENTIONED BY) Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Not to be deleted from the list of 26.07.2019. (B.Parvathi) (Sunil Kumar Rajvanshi) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.13 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IA 17474/2019,17475/2019, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-11- 2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) (IA NO.17475/2019 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA NO.17474/2019 – GRANT OF INJUNCTION) Date : 01-04-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Purbitra Mitra, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mohd. Shazkhan, Adv. Ms. Pallavi, Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA NO.17475/2019 Respondent No.3 is deleted from the array of parties at the 1

risk of the petitioners, as he was ex-parte before the Trial Court as well as the High Court. I.A. No.17475 of 2019 is allowed. IA NO.17474/2019 List along with the main matter. (GEETA AHUJA) (KAILASH CHANDER) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 04-02-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR Mr. R. Naveen Raj, Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Ms. S. Valarmathi, Adv. Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Srivastava, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice issued to Respondent No.3 through the Trial Court. Compliance report is still awaited. The Registry to issue reminder in this regard to the Trial Court. List after four weeks. (RACHNA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.6 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.K. Parthy, Adv.* Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. Naveen Raj, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that now he would be appearing for the petitioners as the erstwhile counsel has become standing counsel for the State. As per Office Report, the service is incomplete on Respondent No.3 as the door of the said Respondent was found locked. If the door was found locked, the concerned official should have pasted the notice on the door of Respondent No.3 as per Rules which could have been termed as sufficient service Be that as it may, the Registry is directed to re-issue the notice to Respondent No.3 with the specific direction to the concerned official either to serve notice through dasti or by

-2- pasting the notice on the door, if Respondent No.3 is not available at the time of service of notice (at his last known address). It is needless to observe that the Panchnama should be drawn pasting the notice on the house of Respondent No.3 and Report to be submitted before this Court. (VISHAL ANAND) (RAJ RANI NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR *Appearance Slip is not given

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 16-07-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR Ms. Maitreyee Mishra,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. S. Nanda Kumar,Adv. Ms. N. Deepika Nandakumar,Adv. Mr. M.S.Saran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By an order dated 18.10.2016 passed by Ld. Registrar (Courts) that respondent no.3 has been served but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Despite that time and again, the petitioner has sought time to serve respondent no.3. Therefore, respondent no.3 deemed to have been served. Registry to verify whether other respondents have been served. If service is complete, list the matter before Court. (KUSUM LATA SYAL) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21032018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms.Maitreyee Mishra,Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR Ms.Sujatha Bayadhi,Adv. Mr.C.Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr.M.s.Sarankumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner has not filed the proof of dasti service on the respondent No.3 so far and as per tracking report the remarks shows that “left without instructions.” Hence, two weeks time as last chance is given to file the proof of dasti failing which the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for further orders. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar SB

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12-01-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. C. Paramasiram,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. S. Nandakumar,Adv. Ms. Tanupriya Gupta,Adv. Mr. M.S. Sarankumar,Adv. Mr. Ram Dhan Singh Narwal,Adv. Ms. Deepikananda Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sugam Kumar Jha,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. K.V. Vijaya Kumar,Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Mishra,Adv. Mr. B. Vinodh Kanna,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last chance, six weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to take steps for effecting service on respondent no.3. Dasti service is permitted. (SAPNA BISHT) (KAILASH CHANDER) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.111 COURT NO.7 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 03-10-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.V. Vijayakumar, Adv. Mr. Maitreyee Mishra, Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect of respondent No. 3. (B.PARVATHI) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.56 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 01-08-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar, Adv. Naresh Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Affidavit with proof of dasti service has not been filed in respect of respondent No.3, despite last and final opportunity having been granted. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar

ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 20/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Partha Sarathi,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is granted to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 06.03.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.3. List the matter on 20.07.2017. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 20.4.2017 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 02 ITEM NO.: 01 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 6 th March, 2017, when the following order was passed:- “Ld. counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 3 within a period of four weeks. List the matter again on 20.04.2017.” It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect of Respondent No. 3 so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 3. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 19 th day of April, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac

(ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 20/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Partha Sarathi,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time as last chance is granted to the Ld.counselfor the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated06.03.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.3.List the matter on 20.07.2017. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With Interim Relief and office report) Date : 06/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the respondent No.3 within a period of four weeks. List the matter again on 20.04.2017. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 06.03.2017 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 02 ITEM NO.: 14 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 25 th January, 2017, when the following order was passed:- “ The respondent Nos.1 & 2 have already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent Nos.4 & 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.6, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Registry to issue notice to the respondent No.3 with utmost dispatch as the petitioner has taken fresh steps. At the request of Ld.counsel dasti is permitted. List the matter again on 06.03.2017.” It is submitted that fresh show cause notice has been issued to unserved respondent No.3 by Registered A.D. Post as well as dasti on 14 th February, 2017. As per track report, item could not be delivered with remarks “Door Locked”. Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed affidavit with proof of dasti service so far. ...2/-

-2- Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 3. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 3 rd day of March, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac

ÊITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With Interim Relief and office report)Date : 06/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd.counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit inproof of dasti service of notice already issued to the respondentNo.3 within a period of four weeks.List the matter again on 20.04.2017. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 25/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.P.Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.1 & 2 have already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent Nos.4 & 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.6, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Registry to issue notice to the respondent No.3 with utmost dispatch as the petitioner has taken fresh steps. At the request of Ld.counsel dasti is permitted. List the matter again on 06.03.2017. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 25.1.2017 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 17 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 5 th January, 2017, when the following order was passed:- “ Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the fresh particulars and to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent No.6 despite opportunities given. However, Ld.counsel has stated that he will take steps today itself. If steps are taken, issue notice. In default whereof, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders. Await orders and thereafter.” It is submitted that there are 6 respondents in the matter. Respondent No. 1 represented through counsel and counter affidavit has been filed. Respondent No. 2, 4 and 5 are represented through Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate and he has filed counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 only. It is also submitted that Respondent No. 6 was served as per track report of show cause notice issued on 14 th September, 2016 but inadvertently Respondent No. 3 was treated as served. Respondent No. 3 is still unserved in the matter. Inconvenience caused is very much regretted. Counsel for the petitioner has already on 6 th January, 2017 filed one spare copy of Special Leave Petition. ...2/-

-2- Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 3. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 24 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac

\202ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 25/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.P.Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent Nos.1 & 2 have already filed the counteraffidavit. The respondent Nos.4 & 5 have failed to file the counteraffidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.6, but noone has entered appearance on his behalf.Registry to issue notice to the respondent No.3 with utmostdispatch as the petitioner has taken fresh steps. At the request ofLd.counsel dasti is permitted.List the matter again on 06.03.2017. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 05/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.P.Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.Parivesh Singh,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the fresh particulars and to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent No.6 despite opportunities given. However, Ld.counsel has stated that he will take steps today itself. If steps are taken, issue notice. In default whereof, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders. Await orders and list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 05/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.P.Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.Parivesh Singh,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd.counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the freshparticulars and to take fresh steps in the respect of therespondent No.6 despite opportunities given. However, Ld.counselhas stated that he will take steps today itself. If steps aretaken, issue notice. In default whereof, list the matter before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders. Await orders and listthereafter. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Prateek Gupata,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 18.10.2016 of this Court in respect of respondent No.6. List again on 5.01.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

LISTED ON. 21.11.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 44 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 18 th October, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “As per tracking report, the respondent No. 3 has been served, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. As per tracking report in respect of respondent No.6, the postal remarks shows that “Insufficient Address”. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the said respondent within a period of four weeks and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List the matter again on 21.11.2016. ” It is submitted that fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved respondent No. 6 as the Counsel for the Petitioner has neither furnished fresh particulars nor taken fresh steps so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 6. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 18 th day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac

`ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 21/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Prateek Gupata,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the orderdated 18.10.2016 of this Court in respect of respondent No.6. List again on 5.01.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 18/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.C.Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.Parivesh Singh,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per tracking report, the respondent No. 3 has been served, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. As per tracking report in respect of respondent No.6, the postal remarks shows that “Insufficient Address”. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the said respondent within a period of four weeks and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List the matter again on 21.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 18.10.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 56 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 1 st September, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No.3 & 6. List the matter again on18.10.2016.” It is submitted that fresh show cause notive has been issued to unserved respondent Nos. 3 and 6 by registered A.D. post on 14 th September, 2016. As per Tracking Report Item has been delivered in respect of respondent No. 3 and Item has been returned to New Delhi GPO in respect of respondent No. 6. No one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 3 so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 6. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 17 th day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

\216ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 18/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.C.Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.Parivesh Singh,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs per tracking report, the respondent No. 3 has been served,but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.As per tracking report in respect of respondent No.6, thepostal remarks shows that â¬ SInsufficient Addressâ¬ \235. Hence, Ld.counselfor the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the saidrespondent within a period of four weeks and he shall also takefresh steps for the service of notice to him within the sameperiod.List the matter again on 21.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 01/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.P.Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.C.Parmasivam,adv. Ms.S.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No.3 & 6. List the matter again on 18.10.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 1.9.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 44 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 21 st July, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent Nos. 3 & 6 within four weeks. List the matter again on 01.09.2016.” It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not taken fresh steps hence fresh show cause notice could not be issued to unserved Respondent Nos. 3 and 6 so far. It is also submitted that Counsel for Respondent No. 1 has on 4 th August, 2016 filed a letter (Copy enclosed) requesting therein to find out the service of earlier notice issued on 5 th April, 2016 through postal tracking system. Report has been generated from India Post website and as per report consignment details not found. Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent Nos. 3 and 6. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 31 st day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

4ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 01/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.P.Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.C.Parmasivam,adv. Ms.S.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to theunserved respondent No.3 & 6.List the matter again on 18.10.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent Nos.3 & 6 within four weeks. List the matter again on 01.09.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 22.07.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 51 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 28 th April, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6. List again on 21.7.2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notices have been received from respondent Nos. 3 and 6 so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 20 th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

2 ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Nithya,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.P.Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent Nos.3 & 6 within four weeks. List the matter again on 01.09.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.07.2116:59:47 TLTReason:

ITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 28/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. C. Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. R espondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6. List again on 21.7.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

LISTED ON. 28.04.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 67 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 10 th March, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 28.4.2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate has not filed counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 so far. It is further submitted that Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, counsel for the petitioner has filed spare copies on 4 th April, 2016. Accordingly, show cause notice has been issued to respondent Nos. 3 and 6 on 5 th April, 2016 and service of notice is awaited. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 26 th day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

\206 ITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 28/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. C. Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6. List again on 21.7.2016.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2016.04.2909:57:34 SCTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 10/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. C. Santhosh Kumar,Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. C. Paramasivam,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M. Soundarasaran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 28.4.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

LISTED ON. 10.03.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 60 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 27 th January, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Four weeks time is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6. List again on 10.3.2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate has not filed counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 so far. It is further submitted that neither A. D. cards nor unserved covers containing notices have been received from respondent Nos. 3 and 6 so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 8 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

ITEM NO.100 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 27/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Maniprabhu,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms./Mr. R. Shase,Adv. Mr. Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. M. Soundarasaran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Four weeks time is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6. List again on 10.3.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

LISTED ON. 27.01.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 100 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 16 th November, 2015, when the following order was passed:- “Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit. The respondent Nos.1 & 5 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos.3 & 6 within four weeks. List the matter again on 27.01.2016. ” It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate has on 16 th November, 2015 filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate has on 19 th November, 2015 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2. It is further submitted that Mr. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 , 4 & 5 so far. ...2/-

-2- It is further submitted that Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 15 th December, 2015 filed spare copies. Accordingly, show cause notice has been issued to Respondent Nos. 3 & 6 on 21 st December, 2015 and service of notice is awaited. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd day of January, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

ITEM NO.100 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSC.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 27/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Maniprabhu,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms./Mr. R. Shase,Adv. Mr. Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. M. Soundarasaran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit.Four weeks time is given to the respondent No.2 to file thecounter affidavit.The Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have failed tofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under therules. Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent Nos. 3 and 6.List again on 10.3.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.91 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 16/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.M.Soundarasaran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit. The respondent Nos.1 & 5 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos.3 & 6 within four weeks. List the matter again on 27.01.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 16.11.2015 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 91 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 21 st August, 2015, when the following order was passed:- “The respondent No. 4 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the other respondents. List the matter again on 16.11.2015.” It is submitted that there are six respondents. Respondent no. 1 is represented by Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate and respondent nos. 4 and 5 are represented by Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate but they have not filed counter affidavit on their behalf so far. A. D. card duly signed has been received from respondent no. 2 but no one has entered appearance so far. In respect of respondent nos. 3 and 6, neither A. D. cards nor unserved covers containing notices have been received so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 5 th day of November, 2015. DEPUTY REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate vk DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¾ ITEM NO.91 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 16/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.M.Soundarasaran Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit. The respondent Nos.1 & 5 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos.3 & 6 within four weeks.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.11.1616:35:25 TLT List the matter again on 27.01.2016.Reason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.87 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.M.Soundarasaran Kumar,Adv. Mr.Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.4 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the other respondents. List the matter again on 16.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

LISTED ON. 21.08.2015 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO.: 2 ITEM NO.: 87 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.15720 OF 2015 T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15 th May, 2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Delay condoned in filing SLP as well as in filing application for substitution of legal heirs of sole petitioner. Application for substitution is allowed. Issue notice. Status quo which exists as on today with regard to the property in question shall be maintained by the parties during the pendency of this petition.” It is submitted that there are six respondents. Show cause notice has been issued to all the six respondents on 23 rd July, 2015. Respondent no.4 is represented by Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate. In respect of respondent nos. 1 to 3, 5 and 6, neither A. D. cards nor unserved covers containing notices have been received so far. The matter above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 19 th day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate vk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ê ITEM NO.87 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15720/2015 T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.M.Soundarasaran Kumar,Adv. Mr.Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.4 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the other respondents. List the matter again on 16.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.08.2416:11:17 TLTReason:

ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 7105/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/11/2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) I.A. 1/2015(with c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 15/05/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Status quo which exists as on today with regard to the property in question shall be maintained by the parties during the pendency of this petition. (VINOD KR.JHA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

LISTED ON. 15.5.2015 COURT NO. 10 ITEM NO. 55 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing of Special Leave Petition) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. _______ (Application for exemption from filing official translation) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. _______ (Application for substitution of legal representative of deceased sole petitioner on record) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. _______ (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO...CC 7105 OF 2015 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. _______ (Application for permission to file additional documents) T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24 th April, 2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “List the matter after two weeks, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners. ” It is submitted that Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, counsel for the petitioner has on 11 th May, 2015 filed an application for permission to file additional documents with affidavit alongwith Annexures P-5 to P-7 and copy of the same is circulated herewith. ...2/-

-2- The applications in the matter above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 13 th day of May, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

\ ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 7105/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/11/2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) I.A. 1/2015(with c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 15/05/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Status quo which exists as on today with regard to the property in question shall be maintained by the parties during the pendency of this petition. (VINOD KR.JHA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA)Signature Not Verified COURT MASTER COURT MASTERDigitally signed byVinod KumarDate: 2015.05.1519:00:54 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.11 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 7105/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/11/2014 in SA No. 396/2011 passed by the High Court Of Madras) T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 24/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after two weeks, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners. (VINOD KR.JHA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

LISTED ON. 24.4.2015 COURT NO. 11 ITEM NO. 37 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing of Special Leave Petition) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. _______ (Application for exemption from filing official translation) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. _______ (Application for substitution of legal representative of deceased sole petitioner on record) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. _______ (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO...CC 7105 OF 2015 T. Amuthan Anthony(D) rep. By Lrs. ...Petitioners Versus C.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed on 27 th March, 2015 against the impugned Judgment and final Order dated 5 th November, 2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Second Appeal No. 396 of 2011 and the same is barred by time by 17 days. Counsel for the Petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has also filed application for exemption from filing official translation, application for substitution of legal representative of deceased sole petitioner on record and application for condonation of delay in filing substitution. ...2/-

-2- The applications in the matter above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21 st day of April, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to : Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

T. AMUTHAN ANTHONY (D) REP. BY LRS. v. C.S.BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS.

Full Judgment Text

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status