ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8449/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/03/2016 in WP No. 3009/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) KAVITA S. GHAGRE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 22/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order so passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed. (SHEETAL DHINGRA) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER
LISTED ON: 22.04.2016 BEFORE COURT NO.: 8 ITEM NO.: 38 SECTION – IX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATTE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 8449 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the Impugned Order) WITH INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for exemption from filing official translation) KAVITA S. GHAGRE ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08 th April 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment for two weeks, the matter is adjourned for two weeks. ” It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that counsel for the petitioner has not filed additional documents so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 18 th day of April 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR VT
Ø ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8449/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/03/2016 in WP No. 3009/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) KAVITA S. GHAGRE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 22/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order so passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed. (SHEETAL DHINGRA) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVISHAL ANANDDate: 2016.04.2516:38:53 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8449/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/03/2016 in WP No. 3009/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) KAVITA S. GHAGRE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 08/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment for two weeks, the matter is adjourned for two weeks. (R.NATARAJAN) (SUMAN JAIN) Court Master Court Master
Ì ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8449/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/03/2016 in WP No. 3009/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) KAVITA S. GHAGRE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 08/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment for two weeks, the matter is adjourned for two weeks. (R.NATARAJAN) (SUMAN JAIN) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byR.NATARAJANDate: 2016.04.0816:45:57 ISTReason: