PANNALAL . vs STATE OF U.P.. — SLP(C) No. 10084/2011
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010102152011
Filing Date
30-Mar-2011
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 10084/2011
Diary Number
10215/2011
Order Date
18-Apr-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PANNALAL .
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P..
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
29-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
15-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
12-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
10-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
05-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
21-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2011
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 10084/2011
-
14-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of SLP(C) No. 10084/2011 (Pannalal v. State of U.P.) On 18/04/2013, the Supreme Court heard all Special Leave Petitions filed by Pannalal and multiple co-petitioners against the State of U.P., which challenged a Allahabad High Court order regarding Rule 26 of the Uttar Pradesh (Civil Police) Constables and Head Constables Service Rules, 2008. The petitioners' counsel submitted that nothing material remained for the Court's consideration, rendering the petitions infructuous. The respondent State did not oppose this position. Consequently, the Court disposed of all petitions as infructuous but granted the petitioners liberty to challenge Rule 26's constitutional validity through an appropriate petition to the proper forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts