ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... of 2015 CRLMP No(s). 6554/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/11/2014 in BA No. 2319/2014 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) CHOTE LAL CHANDRA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp) Date : 24/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Uday Gupta,Adv. Ms. Shivani M. Lal,Adv. Mr. M.K. Tripathi,Adv. Mr. H. Dosan,Adv. Mr. Mohan Pandey,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Delay condoned. We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. We however permit the petitioner to renew his application for bail after material witnesses are examined at the trial. We express no opinion about any such application that the petitioner may make. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
¨ ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... of 2015 CRLMP No(s). 6554/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/11/2014 in BA No. 2319/2014 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) CHOTE LAL CHANDRA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp) Date : 24/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Uday Gupta,Adv. Ms. Shivani M. Lal,Adv. Mr. M.K. Tripathi,Adv. Mr. H. Dosan,Adv. Mr. Mohan Pandey,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Delay condoned. We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. We however permit the petitioner to renew his application for bail after material witnesses are examined at the trial. We express no opinion about any such application that theSignature Not Verified petitioner may make.Digitally signed byMahabir SinghDate: 2015.04.2511:24:21 ISTReason: (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER