1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.7311-7312/2013 R. JAYAPAL Appellant(s) VERSUS SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) HOUSING SCHEME AND ANR. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. Nos.7318-7319/2013, C.A. No. 7313/2013, C.A. Nos. 7316- 7317/2013 & C.A. Nos.7314-7315/2013 O R D E R 1. The State of Tamil Nadu decided to acquire about 35 acres of land situated within the municipal limits of Villipuram District. The land was near the Railway Residential Quarters, Railway Station Villupuram, and Pondy Main Road as well as near the Govt. Arts College. The above-stated proposed acquisition also included small parcels of land owned by the appellants in these five appeals. 2. The notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 were issued on 13-06-1991, 05-09-1991, 18-09-1991, 30-10-1991 and 03-01-1992. Final awards were also passed on different dates i.e. on 09-06-1994, 22-08-1994, 30-12-1994 and 04-01-1995. The Land Acquisition Collector granted compensation @ Rs.11/- per sq. ft. but deducted Rs.3.65 towards development charges and the compensation was, thus, fixed at Rs.7.35 per sq. ft. 3. In the reference under Section 18 of the Act, the Reference Court enhanced the compensation @ Rs. 25.75 per sq. ft. but applied
2 a cut of 53% towards development charges and, hence reduced the market value at Rs.12.10 per sq ft. 4. The dissatisfied appellants approached the High Court through first appeals which have been partly allowed vide impugned Judgment dated 23-12-2009 and while rate of market value was retained at Rs.25.75 per sq. ft., the High Court has reduced the development charges from 53% to 33 1/3 % and has thus finally granted compensation to the appellants @ Rs.17 per sq. ft. 5. Still dissatisfied the appellants are before this Court. 6. The record reveals that notice was issued on 16-07-2010 limited on the point of 33% deduction towards development charges. 7. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the material placed on record. 8. There is no quarrel on the issue that the acquired land falls within the municipal limits and is surrounded by Railway Residential Colony, Government College, Railway Station and is also abutting the National Highway. 9. The High Court has in this regard held as follows:- “Having considered the submission on either side and perused the materials on record, it is seen that vast extent of land measuring about 35 acres was acquired for the purpose of implementing the neighbourhood Scheme of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. The lands are situated in the peripheral area of Villupuram town and the reference Court has observed that the lands are close to National Highway, Government College, Railway Station, Railway Colony and therefore the potentiality of the land is good and would subserve the object of the acquisition. Before the reference Court three documents were exhibited on the side of the claimant and the reference Court accepted the value giving in the sale deed dated 28.2.1990, marked as Ex.P-2. It is seen that the property which was subject matter of the sale deed, Ex.P-2, was to an extent of 2 ½ and the market value was arrived at based on the apparent, sale consideration reflected in the document which was
3 Rs.19,000/- and the value per sq. ft. works out to Rs.25.75 ps. The reference Court accepted the said value and ordered for enhanced compensation.” 10. As regards to the deduction towards development charges, this Court in a catena of decisions has held that no uniform yardstick can be applied and it would depend upon various factors like location of land, the public purpose of acquisition, potentiality and utility of the acquired land and that the development charges can vary from 10% to 70%. 11. These principles were summed up by us in a recent Order in “Uttamrao (Dead) vs. the State of Maharashtra & Others” (Civil Ap - peal No.9362 of 2011), Para 8 whereof is as follows:- “It is well settled in a catena of decisions by this Court that depending upon the area of the acquired land, its lo - cation, public purpose of acquisition and the condition of the land at the spot etc., a suitable deduction ranging from 10% to 70% of the market value can be imposed towards development charges. There cannot be, in this regard, a uniform yardstick and the value of deduction will depend upon the fact situation of each case. Applying this analogy, we find that the acquired land had already been converted into non-agricultural land as the appellant had been accorded permission to develop it as a residential colony.” 12. Keeping these principles in mind, we find that the land of the appellants can be utilized for the public purpose of its acquisition in its entirety without any wastage. 13. Since the surrounding areas of the land are already fully developed, it is difficult to say that the respondent – authorities are required to incur any additional expenditure for the development of the land.
4 14. Since the acquired land is an integral part of the developed area, we are satisfied in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case that not more than 10% of the market value is required to be deducted towards development charges. 15. For the reasons afore-stated, the appeals are allowed in part; the impugned Judgment dated 23-12-2009 of the High Court is modified and it is held that after deducting 10% towards development charges, the appellants are entitled to compensation @ 23 per sq. ft. 16. Ordered accordingly. 17. The appellants are also held entitled to other statutory benefits including solatium, additional compensation and interest in accordance with the provisions of the 1894 Act. 18. The enhanced amount of compensation shall be deposited by the respondent authorities within a period of 90 days from today and the same shall be disbursed to the appellants forthwith. …………………………………J (SURYA KANT) …………………………………J (ARAVIND KUMAR) NEW DELHI 1 st MARCH, 2023.
5 ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.9 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.73117312/2013 R. JAYAPAL Appellant(s) VERSUS SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LAND ACN) HOUSING SCHEME AND ANR. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 73187319/2013 (XII) C.A. No. 7313/2013 (XII) C.A. No. 73167317/2013 (XII) C.A. No. 73147315/2013 (XII) Date : 01032023 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Appellant(s) Ms. C. K. Sucharita, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. D.Kumanan, AOR Mr. B. Balaji, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeals are partly allowed, in terms of the signed order. (VISHAL ANAND) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH) (Signed Order is placed on the file)
ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.9 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.73117312/2013 R. JAYAPAL Appellant(s) VERSUS SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) HOUSING SCHEME AND ANR. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 73187319/2013 (XII) C.A. No. 7313/2013 (XII) C.A. No. 73167317/2013 (XII) C.A. No. 73147315/2013 (XII) Date : 23022023 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Appellant(s) Ms. C. K. Sucharita, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Kumanan, AOR Mr. B. Balaji, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters on 01032023. (VISHAL ANAND) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)
SECTIONIIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7313 OF 2003 AND 88 OF 2010 Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi Etc. ...Appellants Versus M/s. Om Petro Chemicals & Anr. Etc. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7313 OF 2003 It is submitted that there are two respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate and she has also filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1. Copy of the same has been included in the paper books. A.D. card duly signed on 27 th July, 2002 has been received back in respect of respondent No. 2 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of proforma Respondent No. 2. Appeal has been set down ex/parte against Respondent No. 2. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2010 The appeal above mentioned was listed before the Court on 6 th January, 2010, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Leave granted. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 7313 of 2003.” It is submitted that there are two respondents in the matter. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has on 21 st April, 2011 filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 only. It is further submitted that A.D. Card duly signed on 16 th November, 2009 in respect of respondent No. 2 has been received back at SLP stage but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 so far. It is lastly submitted that counsel for the appellant and respondent No. 1 have filed statement of case. Copies of the same have been included in appeal paperbooks.
2 The appeals are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 25 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : *1. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section. 2. Mr. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate 63, Lawyers Chamber. 3. Mr. Rajan Narain, Advocate Jeevan Vihar Building (1 st Floor) 3, Parliament Street, New Delhi110001. 4. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Advocate Central Agency Section. *You are, requested to file Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 Viz. Dy. Director of Income Tax. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR dm
,ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in CRO No.70/2009,ASNo.851/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 26/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Sasi Kala, Adv. for Mr. B.Balaji,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Hearing expedited.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |
\206ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in AS No. 851/2009 and CONo. 70/2009 of the HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOS. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOS. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOs. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 15/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita, Adv. (NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Moulimahendran, Adv. for Mr. B.Balaji, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. (NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter praying for time for filing rejoinder affidavit. Adjourned for four weeks. |(N.S.K. Kamesh) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Court Master | |Court Master |
.ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.5 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgment and order dated 23/12/2009 in A.S. No.851 of 2009 &Cross Objection No.70/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 01/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Rakesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. P. Krishnamoorthy, Adv. Mr. B.Balaji,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R1 Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter for adjournment of the case for filing rejoinder affidavit. As prayed, adjourned by six weeks.|(K.K. Chawla) | (Sneh Bala Mehra) || AR-cum-PS | Court Master |
.ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.5 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgment and order dated 23/12/2009 in A.S. No.851 of 2009 &Cross Objection No.70/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 01/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Rakesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. P. Krishnamoorthy, Adv. Mr. B.Balaji,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R1 Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter for adjournment of the case for filing rejoinder affidavit. As prayed, adjourned by six weeks.|(K.K. Chawla) | (Sneh Bala Mehra) || AR-cum-PS | Court Master |
XITEM NO.39 COURT NO.6 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in AS No. 851/2009 & CONo. 70/2009 of the HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQN.) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOS. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOS. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOS. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 07/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Proxy counsel for Ms. C.K. Sucharita, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. B.Balaji, Adv. (NP) Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. (NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter praying for time for filing rejoinder affidavit. Put up after the ensuing summer vacation. (N.S.K. Kamesh) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Court Master
XITEM NO.44 COURT NO.7 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in ASNo.851/2009 and CRO No.70/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 06/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter praying for adjournment to file rejoinder affidavit. Adjourned for four weeks. (Neetu Khajuria) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr.P.A. Court Master
FITEM NO.39 COURT NO.7 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in CRONo.70/2009 AS No.851/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 12/12/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioners has circulated a letter praying for adjournment to file rejoinder affidavit. Adjourned for four weeks. (Neetu Khajuria) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr.P.A. Court Master
tITEM NO.45 COURT NO.8 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in CRO No.70/2009 andAS No.851/2009 of the HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOs. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NOs. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 10/10/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter praying for time for filing rejoinder affidavit. Adjourned for four weeks. (N.S.K. Kamesh) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.9 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in ASNo.851/2009 and CRO No.70/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010 (With office report)Date: 05/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Shyam Nandan, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter praying for adjournment to file rejoinder affidavit. As prayed, adjourned for four weeks. (Neetu Khajuria) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Court Master
æITEM NO.44 COURT NO.12 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in AS No. 851/2009 &Cross objection No. 70/2009 of the HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 04/07/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita, Adv. Ms. Nirada Das, Adv .For Respondent(s)SC 17695/10 Mr. Guru Krishna Prasad, Adv.SC 17695/10 Mr. S. Prasad, Adv. Mr K.V. Rathee, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter praying for time for filing rejoinder affidavit. .....2/- : 2 : Adjourned for four weeks.(N.S.K. Kamesh) (S.S.R. Krishna) Court Master Court Master
|ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.12 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in CRO No.70/2009 & AS No. 851/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 04/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Harish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioners has circulated a letter praying for time to file rejoinder affidavit. As prayed adjourned for six weeks. (Neetu Khajuria) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Court Master
îITEM NO.44 COURT NO.12 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in CRO No.70/2009 & AS No. 851/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 21/02/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Harish Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioners has circulated a letter praying for time to file rejoinder affidavit. As prayed adjourned for six weeks. (Neetu Khajuria) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Court Master
dITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 11/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner submits that she has filed Vakalatnama but her name is not shown in the cause list. Update the data. Service of notice is complete. Respondent No. 2 alone has filed counter affidavit. The remaining respondents have not filed counter affidavit inspite of last opportunity granted. No further steps as submitted by the Ld. counsel for the petitioner. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
ªITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 16/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the respondents granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matters on 5.11.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
,ITEM NO.78 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 17/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv. Mr.A.Lakshmi Narayanan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.T.Harish Kumar,adv. Mr.P.Prasanth,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In all the cases service is complete. Mr.T.HarishKumar,advocate takes notice for all the respondents. Granted fourweeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. List the matter on 16.11.2010. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
âITEM NO.30+55 COURT NO.12 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17695/2010(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2009 in AS No.851/2009 & CRO No. 70/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)R. JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACN) & ANR. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 17704 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17739-17740 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 17816-17817 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 19426-19427 of 2010(With office report)Date: 16/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Altaf Ahmed, Sr.Adv. Mr. B. Ragunath, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice limited to reduction of 33% as development charges. (Neetu Khajuria) (R.K. Sharma) Sr.P.A. Court Master
fITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 8568-8569/2010R.JAYAPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSPECIAL TAHSILDAR AND ANR. Respondent(s)Date: 07/07/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. A. Lakshmi Narayanan,Advd. Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for condoning the delay of 20 days in refiling the SLP is heard and allowed. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar