RAMPHAL SINGH . vs STATE OF U.P.. — SLP(C) No. 10076/2011

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010102122011

Filing Date

30-Mar-2011

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 10076/2011

Diary Number

10212/2011

Order Date

18-Apr-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPHAL SINGH .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P..

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Feb-2013
  4. 29-Oct-2012
  5. 02-Jul-2012
  6. 16-Apr-2012
  7. 09-Apr-2012
  8. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Sep-2011
  10. 15-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 16-Aug-2011
  12. 01-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Jul-2011
  16. 12-May-2011
  17. 10-May-2011
  18. 09-May-2011
  19. 06-May-2011
  20. 05-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 02-May-2011
  22. 29-Apr-2011
  23. 29-Apr-2011
  24. 21-Apr-2011
  25. 18-Apr-2011
  26. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 01-Apr-2011
  28. 01-Apr-2011
  29. 30-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 10076/2011

  30. 14-Mar-2011
  31. 07-Mar-2011
  32. 03-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 21-Jan-2011
  34. 13-Dec-2010
  35. 19-Nov-2010
  36. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 10076/2011 (Ramphal Singh v. State of U.P.) On 18 April 2013, the Supreme Court heard this Special Leave Petition (one of 48 consolidated petitions) challenging a High Court judgment. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that nothing survives for consideration, and the respondent State did not oppose disposal. The Court ordered the petitions disposed of as infructuous. However, the Court granted liberty to petitioners to challenge the vires of Rule 26 of the Uttar Pradesh (Civil Police) Constables and Head Constables Service Rules, 2008 by filing an appropriate petition before a competent forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case