IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 486 OF 2022 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7800 OF 2019 TRILOKI NATH SINGH ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SOUMYA AGRAWAL, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BALLIA, UTTAR PRADESH ..... RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition in the light of subsequent developments. In view of the statement made, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. We, however, clarify that withdrawal of the contempt petition will have no bearing on the steps taken by the authorities for recovery of excess payments(s), if any, in accordance with the law. ................CJI. (SANJIV KHANNA) ..................J. (SANJAY KUMAR) ..................J. (K.V. VISWANATHAN) NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 12, 2025.
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 486 OF 2022 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7800 OF 2019 TRILOKI NATH SINGH ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SOUMYA AGRAWAL, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BALLIA, UTTAR PRADESH ..... RESPONDENT(S) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No. 142460/2022 - AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE) Date : 12-02-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhro Sanyal, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR Mr. Wrick Chatterjee, Adv. Mrs. Aditi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rudraksh Chandrayan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the signed order. (DEEPAK GUGLANI) (R.S. NARAYANAN) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (signed order is placed on the file)
ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 486/2022 in SLP(C) No. 7800/2019 TRILOKI NATH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SOUMYA AGRAWAL Alleged Contemnor(s)/Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 28082023 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhro Sanyal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR Mr. Wrick Chatterjee, Adv. Mrs. Aditi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Mohan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. At the request of learned counsel appearing for Respondent/alleged contemnor seeking adjournment, the matter is adjourned by three weeks. 2. The respondent shall file all particulars showing how the calculation was made including the basis thereof and the actual orders directing the release of pension containing relevant details. (VISHAL ANAND) (BEENA JOLLY) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 486/2022 in SLP(C) No. 7800/2019 TRILOKI NATH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SOUMYA AGRAWAL Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION IA No. 142460/2022 - AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE) Date : 18-07-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhro Sanyal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR Mr. Wrick Chatterjee, Adv. Mrs. Aditi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Mohan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 28.08.2023. (POOJA SHARMA) (BEENA JOLLY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 486/2022 in SLP(C) No. 7800/2019 TRILOKI NATH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURENDRA VIKRAM Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION IA No. 142460/2022 - AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE) Date : 31-01-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhro Sanyal, AOR Mr. Sagar Roy, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Lamba, Adv. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Ms. Reeta Puniya, Adv. Ms. Saloni Sharan, Adv. Mr. Tarun Kant Samantray, Adv. Mr. Bikash Chandra, Adv. Ms. Rabina Jawed, Adv. Mr. Jitender Sah, Adv. Mr. Siddarth Gautam, Adv. Ms. Sashi Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR Mr. Wrick Chatterjee, Adv. Mrs. Aditi Agarwal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA No. 142460/2022 Application for amendment of cause title is allowed. Final opportunity is granted to the respondent/ alleged contemnor to file an affidavit indicating compliance with this Courts order dated 11.01.2022. List on 14.03.2023. (HARSHITA UPPAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No.486/2022 in SLP(C) No.7800/2019 TRILOKI NATH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURENDRA VIKRAM Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 19-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhro Sanyal, AOR Mrs. Manika, Adv. Mr. Kumar Rajeev, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR Mr. Wrick Chatterjee, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 10 th October, 2022. In the meantime, learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed to effect the amendment to the cause title. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (VIRENDER SINGH) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No.486/2022 in SLP(C) No.7800/2019 TRILOKI NATH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURENDRA VIKRAM Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 29-08-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhro Sanyal, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable on 19.09.2022. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve the learned counsel who had represented the respondent-alleged contemnor on the earlier occasion. In case the response to the instant petition is filed before the next date of hearing, the personal appearance of the alleged contemnor shall stand dispensed with. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (VIRENDER SINGH) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER