RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) v. BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.)NO. 2644 OF 2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties. As substantial number of witnesses have already been examined, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court. However, on the request of the learned counsel for the parties, we request the Trial Court to expedite and conclude the case within a period of six months before the Trial Court. The impugned order not be treated as a precedent. The Special Leave Petition , accordingly, stands disposed of. ......................J (ARUN MISHRA) ......................J. (AMITAVA ROY) NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 3, 2017

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2644/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) Date : 03/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. Nidhi Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Chaubey, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Mr. Jesal Wahi, Adv. Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Special Leave Petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.)NO. 2644 OF 2015RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s)O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties. As substantial number of witnesses have already beenexamined, we are not inclined to interfere with theimpugned order of the High Court. However, on the request of the learned counsel for theparties, we request the Trial Court to expedite andconclude the case within a period of six months before theTrial Court. The impugned order not be treated as aprecedent.The Special Leave Petition , accordingly, standsdisposed of. ......................J (ARUN MISHRA) ......................J. (AMITAVA ROY) NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 3, 2017ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2644/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat at Ahmedabad)RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)Date : 03/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathy, Sr. Adv.Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv.Mr. Nidhi Agrawal, Adv.Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv.Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv.Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv.Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Adv.Mr. Himanshu Chaubey, Adv.Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv.Mr. Jesal Wahi, Adv.Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Special Leave Petition is disposed of in terms ofthe signed order.Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.56 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad) RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathay, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohan Ganpathay, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman gohil, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh, Adv. Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Adv. Ms. Himanshu Choubey, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Ms. Jesal Wahi, Adv. Ms. Mamta Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is stated that 19 witnesses have been examined. As prayed for, ten days time is granted to produce the order sheets. List thereafter. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER

ÜITEM NO.56 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathay, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohan Ganpathay, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman gohil, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh, Adv. Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Adv. Ms. Himanshu Choubey, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Ms. Jesal Wahi, Adv. Ms. Mamta Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is stated that 19 witnesses have been examined.As prayed for, ten days time is granted to produce theorder sheets. List thereafter. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2644/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No.19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad) RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) Date : 02/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. Mr. R. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil,Avd. Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil,Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Chaubey,Adv. For Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks an adjournment to enable him to place Zimini orders on the record of this case. Prayer is allowed. Zimini orders passed by the trial court, along with the petitioner's affidavit, be filed within one week from today. Post for hearing on 13 th January, 2017. 1

Needless to mention that the trial shall continue, in the meantime. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

¤ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2644/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No.19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)Date : 02/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. Mr. R. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil,Avd.Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil,Adv.Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja,Adv.Mr. Himanshu Chaubey,Adv.For Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv.Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner seeks anadjournment to enable him to place Zimini orders on therecord of this case.Prayer is allowed.Zimini orders passed by the trial court, along withthe petitioner's affidavit, be filed within one week fromtoday. Post for hearing on 13 th January, 2017.1Needless to mention that the trial shall continue,in the meantime. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar2

ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad) RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PATEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Chaubey, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Ms. Aagam Kaur, Adv. Ms. Mamta Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after two weeks. (VINOD KUMAR JHA) AR-CUM-PS (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER

SECTION­IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2644 OF 2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL)    .. PETITIONER VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR.   ....RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:   “Issue notice.” Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to both the Respondents through Regd. A.D. Post. It is submitted  that   respondent  No.1 & 2 are represented through and Mr. Vikash Singh and Ms. Hemantika Wahi,  Advocate s respectively. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Court of Registrar from time to time an lastly listed on 25.04.2016, when the following Order was passed:     “ Despite last opportunity granted, respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit. Further opportunity is hereby declined.  Opportunity to respondent no.2 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.  Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. ” The matter  above­mentioned  is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th  day of June, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. N. Ganpathy,  Advocate   2. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate 3. Mr. Vikash Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PATEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Chaubey, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Ms. Aagam Kaur, Adv. Ms. Mamta Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList after two weeks. (VINOD KUMAR JHA)AR-CUM-PS (CHANDER BALA)COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. Mr Manpreet Lamba, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite last opportunity granted, respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit. Further opportunity is hereby declined. Opportunity to respondent no.2 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

´ ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. Mr Manpreet Lamba, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite last opportunity granted, respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit. Further opportunity is hereby declined. Opportunity to respondent no.2 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Registry to process the matter for being listed beforeSignature Not Verified the Hon'ble Court as per rules.Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2016.04.2517:02:28 ISTReason: (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.56 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 10/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit. Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent No.2 has not filed counter affidavit. As such, further opportunity is declined. List again on 25.4.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.56 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents)Date : 10/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted torespondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit.Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondentNo.2 has not filed counter affidavit. As such, furtheropportunity is declined.List again on 25.4.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 15/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of respondent no.1 is complete. The ld. Counsel, Mr Himanshu Chaubey appearing on behalf of Mr Vikash Singh, Advocate-on-record has appeared for him and seeks two weeks time to file vakalatnama. Be filed as assured. Counter affidavit be filed within two weeks thereafter. Service in all respects got complete and respondent no.2 has not chosen to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity. List again on 10.2.2016. (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

æ ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 15/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of respondent no.1 is complete. The ld. Counsel, Mr Himanshu Chaubey appearing on behalf of Mr Vikash Singh, Advocate-on-record has appeared for him and seeks two weeks time to file vakalatnama. Be filed as assured. Counter affidavit be filed within two weeks thereafter. Service in all respects got complete and respondent no.2 has not chosen to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.12.15 List again on 10.2.2016.17:35:33 ISTReason: (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

ITEM NO.104 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 28/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner though has requested one weeks time to serve respondent no.1, but the ld. Counsel, Mr Marsook Bafaki appearing on behalf of Mr Nikhil Goel, Advocate-on-record has appeared on his behalf. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within the respective stipulated time. Respondent no.2 to file counter affidavit within four weeks time as last opportunity. List again on 15.12.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

î ITEM NO.104 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 28/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner though has requested one weeks time to serve respondent no.1, but the ld. Counsel, Mr Marsook Bafaki appearing on behalf of Mr Nikhil Goel, Advocate-on-record has appeared on his behalf. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within the respective stipulated time. Respondent no.2 to file counter affidavit within four weeks time as last opportunity.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.09.30 List again on 15.12.2015.16:39:23 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 30/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of respondent No.1 could not have been effected. The Ld. Counsel has filed a letter dated 1.7.2015 requesting to serve the notice to respondent No.1 through the Investigating Officer. Request is hereby accepted. Notice be accordingly issued. Respondent No.2 has to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' time. List again on 28.9.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

È ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 30/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of respondent No.1 could not have been effected. The Ld. Counsel has filed a letter dated 1.7.2015 requesting to serve the notice to respondent No.1 through the Investigating Officer. Request is hereby accepted. Notice be accordingly issued. Respondent No.2 has to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' time. List again on 28.9.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.08.04 (RACHNA GUPTA)10:57:05 ISTReason: RegistrarÈ ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PETEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS

BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents) Date : 30/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of respondent No.1 could not have been effected. The Ld. Counsel has filed a letter dated 1.7.2015 requesting to serve the notice to respondent No.1 through the Investigating Officer. Request is hereby accepted. Notice be accordingly issued. Respondent No.2 has to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' time. List again on 28.9.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.08.04 (RACHNA GUPTA)10:57:05 ISTReason: Registrar

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PATEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 10/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

þ ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2644/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2015 in CRMA No. 19817/2014 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) RAMNIKBHAI UKABHAI TRETIYA (PATEL) Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATSINH NARVEENSINH RANA & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 10/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv. Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushil Kumar RakhejaDate: 2015.04.1017:39:38 ISTReason: