r IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 418 OF 2013 IN REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1097 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL No. 7712 OF 2002Jones Sopitharaj .... Petitioner(s) VersusChristopher & Anr. .... Respondent(s) O R D E R We have gone through the curative petition and the relevantdocuments. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parametersindicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs. AshokHurra & Anr., reported in 2002 (4) S.C.C. 388. Hence, the CurativePetition is dismissed....................................................CJI. (P. SATHASIVAM)......................................................J. (R.M. LODHA)......................................................J. (H.L. DATTU)......................................................J. (K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN)NEW DELHI;FEBRUARY 20, 2014CHAMBER MATTER SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Curative Petition (Civil) No.418 of 2013 In Review Petition (Civil) No.1097 of 2012 In Civil Appeal No.7712 of 2002JONES SOPITHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHRISTOPHER & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)
Date: 20/02/2014 This Petition was circulated today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The curative petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.|(Chetan Kumar) | |(Savita Sainani) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar | (Signed order is placed on the file)