CHAMBER MATTER SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(C) No. 894/2014 In C.A. No. 2336/2013 STATE OF U.P Petitioner(s) VERSUS PANNALAL & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for C/delay in filing Review Petition) Date : 18/09/2014 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits in terms of the Signed Order. [ Neeta ] [ Usha Sharma] Sr. P.A. Court Master (Signed Order is placed on the file)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 894 OF 2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL No. 2336 OF 2013 STATE OF U.P Petitioner(s) VERSUS PANNALAL & ANR Respondent(s) O R D E R There is delay of 350 days in filing the review petition. We have carefully perused the Review Petition and the connected papers. We are convinced that the order against which review has been sought, does not suffer from any error apparent, warranting its reconsideration. The Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits. .............................J. [SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA] ............................J. [ DIPAK MISRA ] NEW DELHI SEPTEMBER 18, 2014
v CHAMBER MATTER SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(C) No. 894/2014 In C.A. No. 2336/2013 STATE OF U.P Petitioner(s) VERSUS PANNALAL & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for C/delay in filing Review Petition) Date : 18/09/2014 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits in terms of the Signed Order. [ Neeta ] [ Usha Sharma] Sr. P.A. Court Master (Signed Order is placed on the file)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2014.09.2012:22:50 ISTReason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 894 OF 2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL No. 2336 OF 2013STATE OF U.P Petitioner(s) VERSUSPANNALAL & ANR Respondent(s) O R D E R There is delay of 350 days in filing the review petition. We have carefully perused the Review Petition and the
connected papers. We are convinced that the order against whichreview has been sought, does not suffer from any error apparent,warranting its reconsideration. The Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of delayas well as on merits. .............................J. [SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA] ............................J. [DIPAK MISRA]NEW DELHISEPTEMBER 18, 2014