ANIL KUMAR GUPTA ETC ETC v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 1587-1636 OF 2017 SATISH KUMAR GUPTA ETC. ETC. …APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS . ETC. ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs.1637 OF 2017, 1638-1653 OF 2017, 1655-1658 OF 2017, 1659-1663 OF 2017, 1664 OF 2017, 1665-1669 OF 2017, 1670-1675 OF 2017, 1677-1691OF 2017, 1692 OF 2017, 1693 of 2017, 1694 of 2017, 1695 OF 2017, 1696 OF 2017, 1699-1701 OF 2017, 1702 OF 2017, 1703-1780 OF 2017, 1783-1852 OF 2017, 1853-1927 OF 2017, 1930-2003 OF 2017, 2004-2058 OF 2017, 2059-2111 OF 2017, 2112-2114 OF 2017, 2117-2118 OF 2017, 2123-2126 OF 2017, 2127-2128 OF 2017, 2129-2132 OF 2017, 2133-2138 OF 2017, 2139-2143 OF 2017, 2144-2145 OF 2017, 2146-2200 OF 2017, 2201-2203 OF 2017, 2204 of 2017, 2205-2206 OF 2017, 2207-2214 OF 2017, 2215-2219 OF 2017, 2220 OF 2017, 2221-2223 OF 2017, 2224 OF 2017, 2226-2227 OF 2017, 2228 OF 2017, 2232-2246 OF 2017 AND 2249-2279 OF 2017. J U D G M E N T ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. These appeals have been preferred against judgment and order dated 06 th October, 2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.F. A. Nos.4316 of 2010 etc. etc. 2. Question for consideration is whether a post-acquisition allottee of land is necessary or proper party or has any locus to be heard in the matter of determination of compensation under the scheme of the Land Acquisition

2 Act, 1894 (the Act). If not, whether the impugned order permitting additional evidence and directing remand is sustainable. 3. Facts giving rise to the question may be briefly noted. Huge chunks of land were acquired by the State of Haryana in different phases for the public purpose of setting-up Industrial Model Township by the Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) in Gurgaon District in Haryana. Substantial part of the acquired land was allotted by the HSIDC to Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL). One of the clauses in the Conveyance Deed executed in favour of the allottee provided that if compensation was enhanced, the allottee shall be liable to pay additional price on that basis. In HSIDC v. Pran Sukh 1 , issue of compensation for land acquired in Phase I was decided by this Court. Review Petitions against the said judgment were dealt with in HSIDC v. Mawasi 2 and HSIDC v. Pran Sukh 3 . Matter of determining compensation in respect of Phase II and Phase III came-up for consideration in HSIDC v. Udal 4 . As noticed in judgment of this Court in Udal (supra), the Reference Court awarded compensation in the light of compensation determined in the judgment of this Court in Pran Sukh (supra) and other awards relating to land acquired for Phase III. Against the decision of the Reference Court, the land owners as well as the HSIDC filed appeals under Section 54 of the Act. The High Court assessed the 1

(2010) 11 SCC 175 2

(2012) 7 SCC 200 3

(2012) 7 SCC 721 4

(2013) 14 SCC 506

3 compensation based on judgment of this Court in Pran Sukh (supra) . Reference to paras 29 to 33 of the judgment of this Court Udal (supra) shows that after referring to the plea of the HSIDC that the annual increase of 12% for the time gap was erroneous in view of ONGC v. Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel 5 and Valliyammal v. Special Tehsildar (LA) 6 , this Court found merit in the arguments of the land owners that an important piece of evidence was not taken into account which necessitated remand. The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal and it was also observed that MSIL was free to file an appropriate application for its impleadment or for leave to act as intervenor. 4. Thereafter, the matter was dealt with by the High Court in the impugned judgment. The High Court held that the allottee had a right to be impleaded as a party for the following reasons: a) The State or the local authority for whose benefit the land is acquired may not lead proper evidence or advance effective arguments. b) A clause in the deed of allotment in favour of the allottee provides for payment of additional price as a consequence of enhancement of compensation. c) As a result of enhancement of compensation by the Reference 5

(2008) 14 SCC 745 6

(2011) 8 SCC 91

4 Court, the company in question was required to pay about Rs.900 crores. d) Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC the Court can add or delete a party at any stage. e) Section 50 of the Act provides a right to a local authority or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired to be represented before the Collector or the Court in the process of determination of compensation. f) The principle behind giving the right of representation to a local authority or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired can also be applied to any person who is liable to pay the enhanced compensation treating such person to be the “ person interested” under Section 3(b) of the Act. 5. After permitting the allottee to be impleaded as a party, the High Court also allowed application to lead additional evidence on the ground that the acquiring authority did not defend the case properly. Similar application filed by the HSIDC to lead additional evidence was also allowed and, thereafter, on considering the additional evidence it was observed that it was not possible for the High Court to assess the compensation as there was no site plan showing the location of the transactions relied. It was also considered necessary to give an opportunity to MSIL, who was impleaded for the first time. On that basis the matter was remanded to the Reference

5 Court for fresh decision. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the High Court these appeals have been preferred. Contentions of the appellants are as follows: i) The post-acquisition allottee had no right to be heard in the matter of compensation. Reliance has been placed on Hindu Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, Jind and anr. v. Municipal Committee, Jind and ors. 7 ; Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation v. Pran Sukh and ors. (supra) and ; Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan (Dead) by legal representatives and ors. v. State of Karnataka and anr. 8 ii) Applications for impleadment have been filed by MSIL 12 years after the acquisition and applications for additional evidence were also filed after a long delay and for the first time after remand by this Court, which could not be considered within the scope of Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC. (iii) Application for additional evidence was rejected by this Court in the earlier round. The remand by this Court was limited to the question whether there was a need for further enhancement in the light of evidence which was not earlier considered . 7

1988 (Supp) SCC 719 8

(2015) 10 SCC 469

6 7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the MSIL as well as the HSIDC and other allottees have supported the impugned judgment. They submit that since allottees have to pay the enhanced compensation, they ought to be treated as “person interested” under Section 3 (b) of the Act. Reliance has been placed on judgments of this Court in Himalayan Tiles and Marble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Coutinho (Dead) by Lrs. 9 ; Santosh Kumar and ors. v. Central Warehousing Corporation and anr. 10 ; Neyvely Lignite Corporation Ltd. v. Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Neyvely and Ors. 11 and ; U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors. 12 . 8. We have given our due consideration to the rival submissions. 9. To determine the question whether the post-acquisition allottee of land is necessary or proper party or has any locus to be heard in the matter of determination of compensation, we may refer to the scheme of the Act. The acquisition may either be for a “ public purpose ” as defined under Section 3(f) or for a company under Part-VII of the Act. If the acquisition is for a public purpose (as the present case), the land vests in the State after the Collector makes an award and the possession is taken. Till the award is made, no person other than State comes into the picture. Once the land 9

(1980) 3 SCC 223 10

(1986) 2 SCC 343 11

(1995) 1 SCC 221 12

(1995) 2 SCC 326

7 vests in the State, the acquisition is complete. Any transferee from the State is not concerned with the process of acquisition. The State may transfer the land by public auction or by allotment at any price with which the person whose land is acquired has no concern. The mere fact that the Government chooses to determine the allotment price with reference to compensation price determined by the Court does not provide any locus to an allottee to contest the claim for enhancement of compensation. 10. This legal position is well settled on principle as well as the precedent. In Hindu Kanya Maha Vidyalaya (supra) it was observed: “ 3. … … …Indisputably the land in dispute was not acquired for the purpose of appellants instead the land was acquired for the Municipal Committee for the purpose of developing its Scheme No. 5. After the declaration of award Municipal Committee took possession of the land and thereafter transferred a portion of the same to the appellants under an agreement. In these circumstances the ratio laid down by this Court in Himalayan Tiles & Marble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Countinho [(1980) 3 SCC 223] does not apply as the appellants are not interested persons and they have no right to question the award. … … …” 11. Again, in Peerappa Hanmantha (supra) inter alia the following questions were framed for consideration. “ 30.1. (i) Whether the allottee Company (M/s. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd.) is either a beneficiary or interested person entitled for hearing before determination of the market value to award just and reasonable compensation in respect of the acquired land of the appellants either before the Deputy Commissioner or Reference Court? (ii) Whether the writ petition filed by the allottee Company before the High Court is maintainable in law? (iii) Whether the order of remand allowing the writ petition of the allottee Company to the Reference Court is legal and valid?”

8 12. The above questions were answered as follows: “ 63. In view of the foregoing reasons recorded by us on the basis of the acquisition notifications issued by the State Government under the statutory provisions of the KIAD Act and therefore, we have to answer Points ( i ), ( ii ) and ( iii ) in favour of the landowners holding that the Company is neither the beneficiary nor interested person of the acquired land, hence, it has no right to participate in the award proceedings for determination of the market value and award the compensation amount of the acquired land of the appellants. Hence, the writ petition filed by the Company questioning the correctness of the award passed by the Reference Court which is affirmed by the High Court is not at all maintainable in law. On this ground itself, the writ petition filed by the Company should have been rejected by the High Court, instead it has allowed and remanded the case to the Reference Court for reconsideration of the claims after affording opportunity to the Company, which order suffers from error in law and therefore, the same is liable to be set aside.” 13. Judgments in U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (supra), Himalayan Tiles (supra) and P. Narayanappa and anr. v. State of Karnataka and ors. 13 as mentioned in para 61 of the judgment in Peerappa Hanmantha (supra) were held to be not applicable as the same applied only when the acquisition is for a company or for the beneficiary of the acquisition as mentioned in the notification for acquisition itself. This is clear from the following: “ 61. Further, both the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of KIADB and the Company have placed reliance on various decisions rendered by this Court in support of their above respective legal submissions that the Company is an interested person and, therefore, it has got right to participate in the proceedings before the Reference Court for determination of compensation before passing the award either by the Land Acquisition Officer or the Deputy Commissioner or the Reference Court at the instance of the owner or any other interested person. These include judgments rendered by this Court in U.P. Awas Evam Vikas 13

(2006) 7 SCC 578

9 Parishad v. Gyan Devi , Himalayan Tiles and Marble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Coutinho and P. Narayanappa v. State of Karnataka and other decisions which are not required to be mentioned in this judgment as they are all reiteration of the law laid down in the above cases. 62. The reliance placed on the various decisions of this Court by both the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of KIADB and the Company, is misplaced as none of the said judgments relied upon are applicable to the fact situation in the present case for the reason that those cases dealt with reference to the acquisition of land under the provisions of the LA Act, either in favour of the company or development authorities, whereas in the case on hand, the acquisition proceedings have been initiated under the KIAD Act for industrial development by KIADB. Further, the original acquisition record in respect of the acquired land involved in the proceedings by the learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the State of Karnataka as per our directions issued vide our orders dated 17-11-2014 14 and 24-3-2015 15 , do not disclose the fact that the acquisition of lands covered in the acquisition notifications are in favour of the Company. Thus, the acquisition of land in favour of KIADB is abundantly clear from the preliminary and final notifications issued by the State Government and thereafter following the procedure under 14

Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan v. State of Karnataka, SLP(C)No. 19819 of 2013, order dated 17-11-2014 (SC), wherein it was directed: “ Issue notice to the State Government. The learned counsel for the petitioners to take out notice to the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State Government. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, learned counsel accepts notice for the State of Karnataka and Mr. Nishanth Patil, learned counsel accepts notice for Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (for short ‘KIADB’). The learned counsel appearing for the State Governument and the learned counsel appearing for KIADB are directed to produce the relevant records in respect of the proceedings relating to land acquisition involved in these matters. There shall be stay of the effect and operation of the impugned order during the pendency of these petitions. List the matters after four weeks. In the meanwhile, all the respondents are at liberty to file written statements, if any.” 15

Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan v. State of Karnataka, SLP(C)No. 19819 of 2013, order dated 24-3-2015 (SC), wherein it was directed: “Heard Ms. Kiran Suri, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners in SLPS(C)Nos. 31624-25 of 2014 in part. List all the matters as part for further hearing. Vide order dated 17-11-2014, learned counsel for the State as well as the learned counsel for KIADB were directed to produce the relevant records in respect of the proceedings relating to land acquisition involved in these matters, record as well as the records relating to allotment of land. However, as per office records, nothing has been produced so far. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the State as well as the learned counsel for KIADB are directed to comply with the order dated 17-11-2014 and produce the relevant records in respect of the proceedings relating to land acquisition and the allotment of land involved in these matters before the next date of hearing. List the matters on 15-4-2015.”

10 sub-sections (6) and (7) of Section 28 of the KIAD Act, it took possession of the acquired land from the owners who were in possession of the same and was transferred in favour of KIADB for its disposal for the purpose for which lands were acquired as provided under Section 32(2) of the KIAD Act read with the Regulations referred to supra framed by KIADB under Section 41(2)( b ) of the KIAD Act. Therefore, the reliance placed upon the judgments of this Court by the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Company and KIADB, are wholly inapplicable to the fact situation and do not support the case of the Company.” 14. We are in respectful agreement with the above view in Hindu Kanya Maha Vidyalaya (supra) and Peerappa Hanmantha (supra). No contrary view of this Court has been brought to our notice. The judgments relied upon by the respondents are distinguishable as already held by this Court. 15. In Himalayan Tiles (supra) the acquisition was under Part-VII of the Act. In Santosh Kumar (supra) the question was whether award of the Collector could be challenged, to which this Court answered in the negative except on the ground of fraud, corruption or collusion. In Neyvely Lignite (supra) again the acquisition was under Part-VII of the Act and in that context this Court held that the expression “person interested” could include a company or local authority for whose benefit the land was acquired. The post-acquisition allottee cannot by any stretch of imagination be treated at par with beneficiary for whom the land was acquired. In U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (supra), the matter dealt with was in the context of statutory authority for whom the land was acquired. Delhi Development Authority v. Bhola Nath

11 Sharma (dead) by Lrs. and ors. 16 was a case in the context of beneficiary for whom the land was acquired. 16. The only other justification in the impugned judgment which has been relied upon by the respondents is lack of sincerity on the part of the State authority for whose benefit the acquisition has been made viz. HSIDC, which by itself cannot be a valid ground to permit post-acquisition allottee to be treated as a necessary or proper authority under Order I Rule 10 of CPC to proceedings for determination of compensation. The view taken in the impugned judgment cannot be sustained on any principle or precedent. 17. We may now refer to an order of this Court dated 15 th July, 2004 which has been relied upon in the impugned judgment in para 31. There is no consideration of the principle of law and thus, the said order without there being contest on the principle of law could not be treated as a precedent for deciding the legal issue at hand. 18. Accordingly, we hold that the post-acquisition allottee has no locus to be heard in the matter and is neither a necessary nor a proper party. 19. The other part of the impugned order permitting additional evidence and remanding the case for fresh decision is uncalled for. No 16

(2011) 2 SCC 54

12 case was made out for permitting additional evidence on settled principles under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC. The provision is reproduced below:- “ 27. Production of additional evidence in Appellate Court.- (1) The parties to an appeal shall not be entitled to produce additional evidence, whether oral or documentary, in the Appellate Court. But if – (a) the court from whose decree the appeal is preferred has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted, or (aa) the party seeking to produce additional evidence, establishes that notwithstanding the exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within his knowledge or could not, after the exercise of due diligence, be produced by him at the time when the decree appealed against was passed, or (b) the Appellate Court requires any document to be produced or any witness to be examined to enable it to pronounce judgment, or for any other substantial cause, The Appellate Court may allow such evidence or document to be produced, or witness to be examined. (2) Wherever additional evidence is allowed to be produced by an Appellate Court, the Court shall record the reason for its admission.” 20. It is clear that neither the Trial Court has refused to receive the evidence nor it could be said that the evidence sought to be adduced was not available despite the exercise of due diligence nor it could be held to necessary to pronounce the judgment. Additional evidence cannot be permitted to fill-in the lacunae or to patch-up the weak points in the case 17 . 17

N. Kamalam v. Ayyaswami (2001) 7 SCC 503: para 19

13 There was no ground for remand in these circumstances. 21. We may also refer to the argument that this Court, while remanding the matter in the earlier round, had given liberty to the MSIL to file an application for impleadment or to act as an intervenor which implied that such application was to be accepted. We do not find any merit in this contention also. It cannot be held that any right was crystalised by the said observation and such prayer had to be considered according to law. We have already held that the post-acquisition allottee had no right in the matter. 22. For the above reasons, we allow these appeals and set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the High Court once again for fresh decision in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the High Court on 27 th March, 2017. ………… ..…………………………….J. [ ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ] .….……………………..……………..J. [ UDAY UMESH LALIT ] NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 21, 2017.

14 ITEM NO.1A COURT NO.13 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1587-1636/2017 SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs.1637 OF 2017, 1638-1653 OF 2017, 1655-1658 OF 2017, 1659-1663 OF 2017, 1664 OF 2017, 1665-1669 OF 2017, 1670-1675 OF 2017, 1677-1691OF 2017, 1692 OF 2017, 1693 of 2017, 1694 of 2017, 1695 OF 2017, 1696 OF 2017, 1699-1701 OF 2017, 1702 OF 2017, 1703-1780 OF 2017, 1783-1852 OF 2017, 1853-1927 OF 2017, 1930-2003 OF 2017, 2004-2058 OF 2017, 2059-2111 OF 2017, 2112-2114 OF 2017, 2117-2118 OF 2017, 2123-2126 OF 2017, 2127-2128 OF 2017, 2129-2132 OF 2017, 2133-2138 OF 2017, 2139-2143 OF 2017, 2144-2145 OF 2017, 2146-2200 OF 2017, 2201-2203 OF 2017, 2204 of 2017, 2205-2206 OF 2017, 2207-2214 OF 2017, 2215-2219 OF 2017, 2220 OF 2017, 2221-2223 OF 2017, 2224 OF 2017, 2226-2227 OF 2017, 2228 OF 2017, 2232-2246 OF 2017 AND 2249-2279 OF 2017. Date : 21/02/2017 These appeals were called on for pronouncement of judgment today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv. Mr. V.Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Batra,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.

15 Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv. Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv. Mrs.Amita Gupta,Adv. Ms. Neha Tyagi,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia,Sr.Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAG Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,AAG Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. **** Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel pronounced the judgment of the Bench comprising of His Lordship and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. Interlocutory application for impleadment is rejected. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed. Application for discharge of guardian is allowed. The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed reportable judgment. All other pending applications shall also stand

16 disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master (Signed reportable judgment is placed on the file)

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 1587-1636 OF 2017 SATISH KUMAR GUPTA ETC. ETC. …APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS . ETC. ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs.1637 OF 2017, 1638-1653 OF 2017, 1655-1658 OF 2017, 1659-1663 OF 2017, 1664 OF 2017, 1665-1669 OF 2017, 1670-1675 OF 2017, 1677-1691OF 2017, 1692 OF 2017, 1693 of 2017, 1694 of 2017, 1695 OF 2017, 1696 OF 2017, 1699-1701 OF 2017, 1702 OF 2017, 1703-1780 OF 2017, 1783-1852 OF 2017, 1853-1927 OF 2017, 1930-2003 OF 2017, 2004-2058 OF 2017, 2059-2111 OF 2017, 2112-2114 OF 2017, 2117-2118 OF 2017, 2123-2126 OF 2017, 2127-2128 OF 2017, 2129-2132 OF 2017, 2133-2138 OF 2017, 2139-2143 OF 2017, 2144-2145 OF 2017, 2146-2200 OF 2017, 2201-2203 OF 2017, 2204 of 2017, 2205-2206 OF 2017, 2207-2214 OF 2017, 2215-2219 OF 2017, 2220 OF 2017, 2221-2223 OF 2017, 2224 OF 2017, 2226-2227 OF 2017, 2228 OF 2017, 2232-2246 OF 2017 AND 2249-2279 OF 2017. J U D G M E N T ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. These appeals have been preferred against judgment and order dated 06 th October, 2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.F. A. Nos.4316 of 2010 etc. etc. 1

2. Question for consideration is whether a post-acquisition allottee of land is necessary or proper party or has any locus to be heard in the matter of determination of compensation under the scheme of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act). If not, whether the impugned order permitting additional evidence and directing remand is sustainable. 3. Facts giving rise to the question may be briefly noted. Huge chunks of land were acquired by the State of Haryana in different phases for the public purpose of setting-up Industrial Model Township by the Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) in Gurgaon District in Haryana. Substantial part of the acquired land was allotted by the HSIDC to Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL). One of the clauses in the Conveyance Deed executed in favour of the allottee provided that if compensation was enhanced, the allottee shall be liable to pay additional price on that basis. In HSIDC v. Pran Sukh 1 , issue of compensation for land acquired in Phase I was decided by this Court. Review Petitions against the said judgment were dealt with in HSIDC v. Mawasi 2 and HSIDC v. Pran Sukh 3 . Matter of determining compensation in respect 1

(2010) 11 SCC 175 2

(2012) 7 SCC 200 3

(2012) 7 SCC 721 2

of Phase II and Phase III came-up for consideration in HSIDC v. Udal 4 . As noticed in judgment of this Court in Udal (supra), the Reference Court awarded compensation in the light of compensation determined in the judgment of this Court in Pran Sukh (supra) and other awards relating to land acquired for Phase III. Against the decision of the Reference Court, the land owners as well as the HSIDC filed appeals under Section 54 of the Act. The High Court assessed the compensation based on judgment of this Court in Pran Sukh (supra) . Reference to paras 29 to 33 of the judgment of this Court Udal (supra) shows that after referring to the plea of the HSIDC that the annual increase of 12% for the time gap was erroneous in view of ONGC v. Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel 5 and Valliyammal v. Special Tehsildar (LA) 6 , this Court found merit in the arguments of the land owners that an important piece of evidence was not taken into account which necessitated remand. The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal and it was also observed that MSIL was free to file an 4

(2013) 14 SCC 506 5

(2008) 14 SCC 745 6

(2011) 8 SCC 91 3

appropriate application for its impleadment or for leave to act as intervenor. 4. Thereafter, the matter was dealt with by the High Court in the impugned judgment. The High Court held that the allottee had a right to be impleaded as a party for the following reasons: a) The State or the local authority for whose benefit the land is acquired may not lead proper evidence or advance effective arguments. b) A clause in the deed of allotment in favour of the allottee provides for payment of additional price as a consequence of enhancement of compensation. c) As a result of enhancement of compensation by the Reference Court, the company in question was required to pay about Rs.900 crores. d) Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC the Court can add or delete a party at any stage. e) Section 50 of the Act provides a right to a local authority or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired to be represented 4

before the Collector or the Court in the process of determination of compensation. f) The principle behind giving the right of representation to a local authority or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired can also be applied to any person who is liable to pay the enhanced compensation treating such person to be the “ person interested” under Section 3(b) of the Act. 5. After permitting the allottee to be impleaded as a party, the High Court also allowed application to lead additional evidence on the ground that the acquiring authority did not defend the case properly. Similar application filed by the HSIDC to lead additional evidence was also allowed and, thereafter, on considering the additional evidence it was observed that it was not possible for the High Court to assess the compensation as there was no site plan showing the location of the transactions relied. It was also considered necessary to give an opportunity to MSIL, who was impleaded for the first time. On that basis the matter was remanded to the Reference Court for fresh decision. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the High Court these appeals have been preferred. Contentions of the appellants are as follows: 5

i) The post-acquisition allottee had no right to be heard in the matter of compensation. Reliance has been placed on Hindu Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, Jind and anr. v. Municipal Committee, Jind and ors. 7 ; Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation v. Pran Sukh and ors. (supra) and ; Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan (Dead) by legal representatives and ors. v. State of Karnataka and anr. 8 ii) Applications for impleadment have been filed by MSIL 12 years after the acquisition and applications for additional evidence were also filed after a long delay and for the first time after remand by this Court, which could not be considered within the scope of Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC. (iii) Application for additional evidence was rejected by this Court in the earlier round. The remand by this Court was limited to the question whether there was a need for further enhancement in the light of evidence which was not earlier considered . 7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the MSIL as well as the HSIDC and other allottees have supported the impugned judgment. They 7

1988 (Supp) SCC 719 8

(2015) 10 SCC 469 6

submit that since allottees have to pay the enhanced compensation, they ought to be treated as “person interested” under Section 3 (b) of the Act. Reliance has been placed on judgments of this Court in Himalayan Tiles and Marble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Coutinho (Dead) by Lrs. 9 ; Santosh Kumar and ors. v. Central Warehousing Corporation and anr. 10 ; Neyvely Lignite Corporation Ltd. v. Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Neyvely and Ors. 11 and ; U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors. 12 . 8. We have given our due consideration to the rival submissions. 9. To determine the question whether the post-acquisition allottee of land is necessary or proper party or has any locus to be heard in the matter of determination of compensation, we may refer to the scheme of the Act. The acquisition may either be for a “ public purpose ” as defined under Section 3(f) or for a company under Part-VII of the Act. If the acquisition is for a public purpose (as the present case), the land vests in 9

(1980) 3 SCC 223 10

(1986) 2 SCC 343 11

(1995) 1 SCC 221 12

(1995) 2 SCC 326 7

the State after the Collector makes an award and the possession is taken. Till the award is made, no person other than State comes into the picture. Once the land vests in the State, the acquisition is complete. Any transferee from the State is not concerned with the process of acquisition. The State may transfer the land by public auction or by allotment at any price with which the person whose land is acquired has no concern. The mere fact that the Government chooses to determine the allotment price with reference to compensation price determined by the Court does not provide any locus to an allottee to contest the claim for enhancement of compensation. 10. This legal position is well settled on principle as well as the precedent. In Hindu Kanya Maha Vidyalaya (supra) it was observed: “ 3. … … …Indisputably the land in dispute was not acquired for the purpose of appellants instead the land was acquired for the Municipal Committee for the purpose of developing its Scheme No. 5. After the declaration of award Municipal Committee took possession of the land and thereafter transferred a portion of the same to the appellants under an agreement. In these circumstances the ratio laid down by this Court in Himalayan Tiles & Marble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Countinho [(1980) 3 SCC 223] does not apply as the appellants are not interested persons and they have no right to question the award. … … …” 11. Again, in Peerappa Hanmantha (supra) inter alia the following questions were framed for consideration. 8

“ 30.1. (i) Whether the allottee Company (M/s. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd.) is either a beneficiary or interested person entitled for hearing before determination of the market value to award just and reasonable compensation in respect of the acquired land of the appellants either before the Deputy Commissioner or Reference Court? (ii) Whether the writ petition filed by the allottee Company before the High Court is maintainable in law? (iii) Whether the order of remand allowing the writ petition of the allottee Company to the Reference Court is legal and valid?” 12. The above questions were answered as follows: “ 63. In view of the foregoing reasons recorded by us on the basis of the acquisition notifications issued by the State Government under the statutory provisions of the KIAD Act and therefore, we have to answer Points ( i ), ( ii ) and ( iii ) in favour of the landowners holding that the Company is neither the beneficiary nor interested person of the acquired land, hence, it has no right to participate in the award proceedings for determination of the market value and award the compensation amount of the acquired land of the appellants. Hence, the writ petition filed by the Company questioning the correctness of the award passed by the Reference Court which is affirmed by the High Court is not at all maintainable in law. On this ground itself, the writ petition filed by the Company should have been rejected by the High Court, instead it has allowed and remanded the case to the Reference Court for reconsideration of the claims after affording opportunity to the Company, which order suffers from error in law and therefore, the same is liable to be set aside.” 13. Judgments in U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (supra), Himalayan Tiles (supra) and P. Narayanappa and anr. v. State of Karnataka and ors. 13 as mentioned in para 61 of the judgment in 13 9

Peerappa Hanmantha (supra) were held to be not applicable as the same applied only when the acquisition is for a company or for the beneficiary of the acquisition as mentioned in the notification for acquisition itself. This is clear from the following: “ 61. Further, both the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of KIADB and the Company have placed reliance on various decisions rendered by this Court in support of their above respective legal submissions that the Company is an interested person and, therefore, it has got right to participate in the proceedings before the Reference Court for determination of compensation before passing the award either by the Land Acquisition Officer or the Deputy Commissioner or the Reference Court at the instance of the owner or any other interested person. These include judgments rendered by this Court in U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi , Himalayan Tiles and Marble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Coutinho and P. Narayanappa v. State of Karnataka and other decisions which are not required to be mentioned in this judgment as they are all reiteration of the law laid down in the above cases. 62. The reliance placed on the various decisions of this Court by both the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of KIADB and the Company, is misplaced as none of the said judgments relied upon are applicable to the fact situation in the present case for the reason that those cases dealt with reference to the acquisition of land under the provisions of the LA Act, either in favour of the company or development authorities, whereas in the case on hand, the acquisition proceedings have been initiated under the KIAD Act for industrial development by KIADB. Further, the original acquisition record in respect of the acquired land involved in the proceedings by the learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the State of Karnataka as per our directions issued vide our

(2006) 7 SCC 578 10

orders dated 17-11-2014 14 and 24-3-2015 15 , do not disclose the fact that the acquisition of lands covered in the acquisition notifications are in favour of the Company. Thus, the acquisition of land in favour of KIADB is abundantly clear from the preliminary and final notifications issued by the State Government and thereafter following the procedure under sub-sections (6) and (7) of Section 28 of the KIAD Act, it took possession of the acquired land from the owners who were in possession of the same and was transferred in favour of KIADB for its disposal for the purpose for which lands were acquired as provided under Section 32(2) of the KIAD Act read with the Regulations referred to supra framed by KIADB under Section 41(2)( b ) of the KIAD Act. Therefore, the reliance placed upon the judgments of this Court by the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Company and KIADB, are wholly inapplicable to the fact situation and do not support the case of the Company.” 14

14. We are in respectful agreement with the above view in Hindu Kanya Maha Vidyalaya (supra) and Peerappa Hanmantha (supra). No contrary view of this Court has been brought to our notice. The judgments relied upon by the respondents are distinguishable as already held by this Court. 15. In Himalayan Tiles (supra) the acquisition was under Part-VII of the Act. In Santosh Kumar (supra) the question was whether award of the Collector could be challenged, to which this Court answered in the negative except on the ground of fraud, corruption or collusion. In Neyvely Lignite (supra) again the acquisition was under Part-VII of the Act and in that context this Court held that the expression “person interested” could include a company or local authority for whose benefit the land was acquired. The post-acquisition allottee cannot by any stretch of imagination be treated at par with beneficiary for whom the land was acquired. In U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (supra), the matter dealt with was in the context of statutory authority for whom the land was acquired. Delhi Development Authority v. Bhola Nath Sharma (dead) by 12

Lrs. and ors. 16 was a case in the context of beneficiary for whom the land was acquired. 16. The only other justification in the impugned judgment which has been relied upon by the respondents is lack of sincerity on the part of the State authority for whose benefit the acquisition has been made viz. HSIDC, which by itself cannot be a valid ground to permit post-acquisition allottee to be treated as a necessary or proper authority under Order I Rule 10 of CPC to proceedings for determination of compensation. The view taken in the impugned judgment cannot be sustained on any principle or precedent. 17. We may now refer to an order of this Court dated 15 th July, 2004 which has been relied upon in the impugned judgment in para 31. There is no consideration of the principle of law and thus, the said order without there being contest on the principle of law could not be treated as a precedent for deciding the legal issue at hand. 16

(2011) 2 SCC 54 13

18. Accordingly, we hold that the post-acquisition allottee has no locus to be heard in the matter and is neither a necessary nor a proper party. 19. The other part of the impugned order permitting additional evidence and remanding the case for fresh decision is uncalled for. No case was made out for permitting additional evidence on settled principles under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC. The provision is reproduced below:- “ 27. Production of additional evidence in Appellate Court.- (1) The parties to an appeal shall not be entitled to produce additional evidence, whether oral or documentary, in the Appellate Court. But if – (a) the court from whose decree the appeal is preferred has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted, or (aa) the party seeking to produce additional evidence, establishes that notwithstanding the exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within his knowledge or could not, after the exercise of due diligence, be produced by him at the time when the decree appealed against was passed, or (b) the Appellate Court requires any document to be produced or any witness to be examined to enable it to pronounce judgment, or for any other substantial cause, The Appellate Court may allow such evidence or document to be produced, or witness to be examined. 14

(2) Wherever additional evidence is allowed to be produced by an Appellate Court, the Court shall record the reason for its admission.” 20. It is clear that neither the Trial Court has refused to receive the evidence nor it could be said that the evidence sought to be adduced was not available despite the exercise of due diligence nor it could be held to necessary to pronounce the judgment. Additional evidence cannot be permitted to fill-in the lacunae or to patch-up the weak points in the case 17 . There was no ground for remand in these circumstances. 21. We may also refer to the argument that this Court, while remanding the matter in the earlier round, had given liberty to the MSIL to file an application for impleadment or to act as an intervenor which implied that such application was to be accepted. We do not find any merit in this contention also. It cannot be held that any right was crystalised by the said observation and such prayer had to be considered according to law. We have already held that the post-acquisition allottee had no right in the matter. 17

N. Kamalam v. Ayyaswami (2001) 7 SCC 503: para 19 15

22. For the above reasons, we allow these appeals and set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the High Court once again for fresh decision in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the High Court on 27 th March, 2017. ………… ..…………………………….J. [ ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ] .….……………………..……………..J. [ UDAY UMESH LALIT ] NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 21, 2017. 16

ÚÛ1REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NOs. 1587-1636 OF 2017SATISH KUMAR GUPTA ETC. ETC. â¬ ¦APPELLANTSVERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS . ETC. ...RESPONDENTSWITHCIVIL APPEAL NOs.1637 OF 2017, 1638-1653 OF 2017, 1655-1658 OF2017, 1659-1663 OF 2017, 1664 OF 2017, 1665-1669 OF 2017, 1670-1675OF 2017, 1677-1691OF 2017, 1692 OF 2017, 1693 of 2017, 1694 of 2017,1695 OF 2017, 1696 OF 2017, 1699-1701 OF 2017, 1702 OF 2017,1703-1780 OF 2017, 1783-1852 OF 2017, 1853-1927 OF 2017, 1930-2003OF 2017, 2004-2058 OF 2017, 2059-2111 OF 2017, 2112-2114 OF 2017,2117-2118 OF 2017, 2123-2126 OF 2017, 2127-2128 OF 2017, 2129-2132OF 2017, 2133-2138 OF 2017, 2139-2143 OF 2017, 2144-2145 OF 2017,2146-2200 OF 2017, 2201-2203 OF 2017, 2204 of 2017, 2205-2206 OF2017, 2207-2214 OF 2017, 2215-2219 OF 2017, 2220 OF 2017, 2221-2223OF 2017, 2224 OF 2017, 2226-2227 OF 2017, 2228 OF 2017, 2232-2246OF 2017 AND 2249-2279 OF 2017.J U D G M E N TADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. These appeals have been preferred against judgment and order dated06 th October, 2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana atChandigarh in R.F. A. Nos.4316 of 2010 etc. etc. 2. Question for consideration is whether a post-acquisition allottee ofland is necessary or proper party or has any locus to be heard in the matterof determination of compensation under the scheme of the Land Acquisition2Act, 1894 (the Act). If not, whether the impugned order permittingadditional evidence and directing remand is sustainable. 3. Facts giving rise to the question may be briefly noted. Huge chunks ofland were acquired by the State of Haryana in different phases for thepublic purpose of setting-up Industrial Model Township by the HaryanaState Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) in Gurgaon District inHaryana. Substantial part of the acquired land was allotted by the HSIDC toMaruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL). One of the clauses in the ConveyanceDeed executed in favour of the allottee provided that if compensation wasenhanced, the allottee shall be liable to pay additional price on that basis.In HSIDC v. Pran Sukh 1, issue of compensation for land acquired in PhaseI was decided by this Court. Review Petitions against the said judgmentwere dealt with in HSIDC v. Mawasi 2 and HSIDC v. Pran Sukh 3. Matterof determining compensation in respect of Phase II and Phase III came-upfor consideration in HSIDC v. Udal 4. As noticed in judgment of this Courtin Udal (supra), the Reference Court awarded compensation in the light ofcompensation determined in the judgment of this Court in Pran Sukh(supra) and other awards relating to land acquired for Phase III. Against thedecision of the Reference Court, the land owners as well as the HSIDC filedappeals under Section 54 of the Act. The High Court assessed the1 (2010) 11 SCC 1752 (2012) 7 SCC 2003 (2012) 7 SCC 7214 (2013) 14 SCC 5063compensation based on judgment of this Court in Pran Sukh (supra) .

Reference to paras 29 to 33 of the judgment of this Court Udal (supra)shows that after referring to the plea of the HSIDC that the annual increaseof 12% for the time gap was erroneous in view of ONGC v. RameshbhaiJivanbhai Patel 5 and Valliyammal v. Special Tehsildar (LA) 6, this Courtfound merit in the arguments of the land owners that an important piece ofevidence was not taken into account which necessitated remand. Thematter was remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal and it was alsoobserved that MSIL was free to file an appropriate application for itsimpleadment or for leave to act as intervenor. 4. Thereafter, the matter was dealt with by the High Court in theimpugned judgment. The High Court held that the allottee had a right to beimpleaded as a party for the following reasons:a) The State or the local authority for whose benefit the land isacquired may not lead proper evidence or advance effectivearguments. b) A clause in the deed of allotment in favour of the allotteeprovides for payment of additional price as a consequence ofenhancement of compensation.c) As a result of enhancement of compensation by the Reference5 (2008) 14 SCC 7456 (2011) 8 SCC 914Court, the company in question was required to pay about Rs.900crores.d) Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC the Court can add or delete aparty at any stage.e) Section 50 of the Act provides a right to a local authority or acompany for whose benefit the land is acquired to be representedbefore the Collector or the Court in the process of determination ofcompensation. f) The principle behind giving the right of representation to a localauthority or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired can alsobe applied to any person who is liable to pay the enhancedcompensation treating such person to be the â¬ S person interestedâ¬ \235 underSection 3(b) of the Act.5. After permitting the allottee to be impleaded as a party, the HighCourt also allowed application to lead additional evidence on the groundthat the acquiring authority did not defend the case properly. Similarapplication filed by the HSIDC to lead additional evidence was also allowedand, thereafter, on considering the additional evidence it was observed thatit was not possible for the High Court to assess the compensation as therewas no site plan showing the location of the transactions relied. It was alsoconsidered necessary to give an opportunity to MSIL, who was impleadedfor the first time. On that basis the matter was remanded to the Reference5Court for fresh decision. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the High Court these appeals have beenpreferred. Contentions of the appellants are as follows: i) The post-acquisition allottee had no right to be heard in thematter of compensation. Reliance has been placed on Hindu KanyaMaha Vidyalaya, Jind and anr. v. Municipal Committee, Jindand ors. 7; Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation v.Pran Sukh and ors. (supra) and ; Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan(Dead) by legal representatives and ors. v. State of Karnatakaand anr. 8 ii) Applications for impleadment have been filed by MSIL 12 years afterthe acquisition and applications for additional evidence were also filedafter a long delay and for the first time after remand by this Court,which could not be considered within the scope of Order XLI Rule 27

of CPC. (iii) Application for additional evidence was rejected by this Court inthe earlier round. The remand by this Court was limited to thequestion whether there was a need for further enhancement in thelight of evidence which was not earlier considered .7 1988 (Supp) SCC 7198 (2015) 10 SCC 46967. On the other hand, learned counsel for the MSIL as well as the HSIDCand other allottees have supported the impugned judgment. They submitthat since allottees have to pay the enhanced compensation, they ought tobe treated as â¬ Sperson interestedâ¬ \235 under Section 3 (b) of the Act. Reliancehas been placed on judgments of this Court in Himalayan Tiles andMarble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Coutinho (Dead) by Lrs. 9; SantoshKumar and ors. v. Central Warehousing Corporation and anr. 10;Neyvely Lignite Corporation Ltd. v. Special Tahsildar (LandAcquisition) Neyvely and Ors. 11 and ; U.P. Awas Evam VikasParishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors. 12.8. We have given our due consideration to the rival submissions.9. To determine the question whether the post-acquisition allottee ofland is necessary or proper party or has any locus to be heard in the matterof determination of compensation, we may refer to the scheme of the Act.The acquisition may either be for a â¬ S public purpose â¬ \235 as defined underSection 3(f) or for a company under Part-VII of the Act. If the acquisition isfor a public purpose (as the present case), the land vests in the State afterthe Collector makes an award and the possession is taken. Till the awardis made, no person other than State comes into the picture. Once the land9 (1980) 3 SCC 22310 (1986) 2 SCC 34311 (1995) 1 SCC 22112 (1995) 2 SCC 3267vests in the State, the acquisition is complete. Any transferee from theState is not concerned with the process of acquisition. The State maytransfer the land by public auction or by allotment at any price with whichthe person whose land is acquired has no concern. The mere fact that theGovernment chooses to determine the allotment price with reference tocompensation price determined by the Court does not provide any locus toan allottee to contest the claim for enhancement of compensation. 10. This legal position is well settled on principle as well as the precedent.In Hindu Kanya Maha Vidyalaya (supra) it was observed:â¬ S 3. â¬ ¦ â¬ ¦ â¬ ¦Indisputably the land in dispute was not acquired forthe purpose of appellants instead the land was acquired for theMunicipal Committee for the purpose of developing its Scheme No.5. After the declaration of award Municipal Committee tookpossession of the land and thereafter transferred a portion of thesame to the appellants under an agreement. In thesecircumstances the ratio laid down by this Court in HimalayanTiles & Marble (P) Ltd. v. Francis Victor Countinho [(1980) 3 SCC223] does not apply as the appellants are not interested personsand they have no right to question the award. â¬ ¦ â¬ ¦ â¬ ¦â¬ \235 11. Again, in Peerappa Hanmantha (supra) inter alia the followingquestions were framed for consideration.

â¬ S 30.1. (i) Whether the allottee Company (M/s. Ultra Tech CementLtd.) is either a beneficiary or interested person entitled forhearing before determination of the market value to award justand reasonable compensation in respect of the acquired land ofthe appellants either before the Deputy Commissioner orReference Court? (ii) Whether the writ petition filed by the allottee Company beforethe High Court is maintainable in law?(iii) Whether the order of remand allowing the writ petition of theallottee Company to the Reference Court is legal and valid?â¬ \235812. The above questions were answered as follows:â¬ S 63. In view of the foregoing reasons recorded by us on the basisof the acquisition notifications issued by the State Governmentunder the statutory provisions of the KIAD Act and therefore, wehave to answer Points ( i ), ( ii ) and ( iii ) in favour of the landownersholding that the Company is neither the beneficiary nor interestedperson of the acquired land, hence, it has no right to participate inthe award proceedings for determination of the market value andaward the compensation amount of the acquired land of theappellants. Hence, the writ petition filed by the Companyquestioning the correctness of the award passed by the ReferenceCourt which is affirmed by the High Court is not at allmaintainable in law. On this ground itself, the writ petition filedby the Company should have been rejected by the High Court,instead it has allowed and remanded the case to the ReferenceCourt for reconsideration of the claims after affording opportunityto the Company, which order suffers from error in law andtherefore, the same is liable to be set aside.â¬ \23513. Judgments in U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (supra), HimalayanTiles (supra) and P. Narayanappa and anr. v. State of Karnataka andors. 13 as mentioned in para 61 of the judgment in Peerappa Hanmantha(supra) were held to be not applicable as the same applied only when theacquisition is for a company or for the beneficiary of the acquisition asmentioned in the notification for acquisition itself. This is clear from thefollowing:â¬ S 61. Further, both the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of KIADBand the Company have placed reliance on various decisionsrendered by this Court in support of their above respective legalsubmissions that the Company is an interested person and,therefore, it has got right to participate in the proceedings beforethe Reference Court for determination of compensation beforepassing the award either by the Land Acquisition Officer or theDeputy Commissioner or the Reference Court at the instance ofthe owner or any other interested person. These includejudgments rendered by this Court in U.P. Awas Evam Vikas13 (2006) 7 SCC 5789Parishad v. Gyan Devi , Himalayan Tiles and Marble (P) Ltd. v.Francis Victor Coutinho and P. Narayanappa v. State ofKarnataka and other decisions which are not required to bementioned in this judgment as they are all reiteration of the lawlaid down in the above cases.62. The reliance placed on the various decisions of this Court byboth the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of KIADB and theCompany, is misplaced as none of the said judgments relied uponare applicable to the fact situation in the present case for thereason that those cases dealt with reference to the acquisition ofland under the provisions of the LA Act, either in favour of thecompany or development authorities, whereas in the case onhand, the acquisition proceedings have been initiated under theKIAD Act for industrial development by KIADB. Further, the

original acquisition record in respect of the acquired land involvedin the proceedings by the learned Standing Counsel on behalf ofthe State of Karnataka as per our directions issued vide ourorders dated 17-11-2014 14 and 24-3-2015 15, do not disclose thefact that the acquisition of lands covered in the acquisitionnotifications are in favour of the Company. Thus, the acquisitionof land in favour of KIADB is abundantly clear from thepreliminary and final notifications issued by the StateGovernment and thereafter following the procedure under14 Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan v. State of Karnataka, SLP(C)No. 19819 of 2013,order dated 17-11-2014 (SC), wherein it was directed: â¬ S Issue notice to the StateGovernment. The learned counsel for the petitioners to take out notice to the learnedStanding Counsel appearing for the State Government. Dasti, in addition, is alsopermitted. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, learned counsel accepts notice for the State ofKarnataka and Mr. Nishanth Patil, learned counsel accepts notice for KarnatakaIndustrial Area Development Board (for short â¬ ÜKIADBâ¬ "!). The learned counsel appearingfor the State Governument and the learned counsel appearing for KIADB are directedto produce the relevant records in respect of the proceedings relating to landacquisition involved in these matters. There shall be stay of the effect and operation ofthe impugned order during the pendency of these petitions. List the matters after fourweeks. In the meanwhile, all the respondents are at liberty to file written statements,if any.â¬ \23515 Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan v. State of Karnataka, SLP(C)No. 19819 of 2013,order dated 24-3-2015 (SC), wherein it was directed: â¬ SHeard Ms. Kiran Suri, learnedSenior Counsel for the petitioners in SLPS(C)Nos. 31624-25 of 2014 in part. List all thematters as part for further hearing. Vide order dated 17-11-2014, learned counsel forthe State as well as the learned counsel for KIADB were directed to produce therelevant records in respect of the proceedings relating to land acquisition involved inthese matters, record as well as the records relating to allotment of land. However, asper office records, nothing has been produced so far. In this view of the matter, thelearned counsel for the State as well as the learned counsel for KIADB are directed tocomply with the order dated 17-11-2014 and produce the relevant records in respect ofthe proceedings relating to land acquisition and the allotment of land involved in thesematters before the next date of hearing. List the matters on 15-4-2015.â¬ \23510sub-sections (6) and (7) of Section 28 of the KIAD Act, it tookpossession of the acquired land from the owners who were inpossession of the same and was transferred in favour of KIADBfor its disposal for the purpose for which lands were acquired asprovided under Section 32(2) of the KIAD Act read with theRegulations referred to supra framed by KIADB under Section41(2)( b ) of the KIAD Act. Therefore, the reliance placed upon thejudgments of this Court by the learned Senior Counsel on behalfof the Company and KIADB, are wholly inapplicable to the factsituation and do not support the case of the Company.â¬ \23514. We are in respectful agreement with the above view in HinduKanya Maha Vidyalaya (supra) and Peerappa Hanmantha (supra).No contrary view of this Court has been brought to our notice. Thejudgments relied upon by the respondents are distinguishable as alreadyheld by this Court. 15. In Himalayan Tiles (supra) the acquisition was under Part-VIIof the Act. In Santosh Kumar (supra) the question was whether awardof the Collector could be challenged, to which this Court answered in thenegative except on the ground of fraud, corruption or collusion. In

Neyvely Lignite (supra) again the acquisition was under Part-VII of theAct and in that context this Court held that the expression â¬ Spersoninterestedâ¬ \235 could include a company or local authority for whose benefitthe land was acquired. The post-acquisition allottee cannot by anystretch of imagination be treated at par with beneficiary for whom theland was acquired. In U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (supra), thematter dealt with was in the context of statutory authority for whom theland was acquired. Delhi Development Authority v. Bhola Nath11Sharma (dead) by Lrs. and ors. 16 was a case in the context ofbeneficiary for whom the land was acquired. 16. The only other justification in the impugned judgment which hasbeen relied upon by the respondents is lack of sincerity on the part of theState authority for whose benefit the acquisition has been made viz.HSIDC, which by itself cannot be a valid ground to permitpost-acquisition allottee to be treated as a necessary or proper authorityunder Order I Rule 10 of CPC to proceedings for determination ofcompensation. The view taken in the impugned judgment cannot besustained on any principle or precedent. 17. We may now refer to an order of this Court dated 15 thJuly, 2004 which has been relied upon in the impugned judgment inpara 31. There is no consideration of the principle of law and thus, thesaid order without there being contest on the principle of law could notbe treated as a precedent for deciding the legal issue at hand. 18. Accordingly, we hold that the post-acquisition allottee has nolocus to be heard in the matter and is neither a necessary nor a properparty. 19. The other part of the impugned order permitting additionalevidence and remanding the case for fresh decision is uncalled for. No16 (2011) 2 SCC 5412case was made out for permitting additional evidence on settledprinciples under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC. The provision is reproducedbelow:-â¬ S 27. Production of additional evidence in AppellateCourt.- (1) The parties to an appeal shall not be entitled toproduce additional evidence, whether oral or documentary,in the Appellate Court. But if â¬ (a) the court from whose decree the appeal ispreferred has refused to admit evidence which ought tohave been admitted, or(aa) the party seeking to produce additional evidence,establishes that notwithstanding the exercise of duediligence, such evidence was not within his knowledge orcould not, after the exercise of due diligence, be producedby him at the time when the decree appealed against waspassed, or(b) the Appellate Court requires any document to beproduced or any witness to be examined to enable it topronounce judgment, or for any other substantial cause,The Appellate Court may allow such evidence ordocument to be produced, or witness to be examined.(2) Wherever additional evidence is allowed to beproduced by an Appellate Court, the Court shall record thereason for its admission.â¬ \23520. It is clear that neither the Trial Court has refused to receive theevidence nor it could be said that the evidence sought to be adduced wasnot available despite the exercise of due diligence nor it could be held tonecessary to pronounce the judgment. Additional evidence cannot bepermitted to fill-in the lacunae or to patch-up the weak points in the case 17.17

N. Kamalam v. Ayyaswami (2001) 7 SCC 503: para 1913There was no ground for remand in these circumstances. 21. We may also refer to the argument that this Court, while remandingthe matter in the earlier round, had given liberty to the MSIL to file anapplication for impleadment or to act as an intervenor which implied thatsuch application was to be accepted. We do not find any merit in thiscontention also. It cannot be held that any right was crystalised by thesaid observation and such prayer had to be considered according to law.We have already held that the post-acquisition allottee had no right in thematter. 22. For the above reasons, we allow these appeals and set aside theimpugned order and remand the matter to the High Court once again forfresh decision in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appearbefore the High Court on 27 th March, 2017.â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦ ..â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦.J. [ ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ].â¬ ¦.â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦..â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦â¬ ¦..J. [ UDAY UMESH LALIT ]NEW DELHI;FEBRUARY 21, 2017.14ITEM NO.1A COURT NO.13 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal No(s). 1587-1636/2017SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)WITHCIVIL APPEAL NOs.1637 OF 2017, 1638-1653 OF 2017, 1655-1658 OF2017, 1659-1663 OF 2017, 1664 OF 2017, 1665-1669 OF 2017, 1670-1675OF 2017, 1677-1691OF 2017, 1692 OF 2017, 1693 of 2017, 1694 of2017, 1695 OF 2017, 1696 OF 2017, 1699-1701 OF 2017, 1702 OF 2017,1703-1780 OF 2017, 1783-1852 OF 2017, 1853-1927 OF 2017, 1930-2003OF 2017, 2004-2058 OF 2017, 2059-2111 OF 2017, 2112-2114 OF 2017,2117-2118 OF 2017, 2123-2126 OF 2017, 2127-2128 OF 2017, 2129-2132OF 2017, 2133-2138 OF 2017, 2139-2143 OF 2017, 2144-2145 OF 2017,2146-2200 OF 2017, 2201-2203 OF 2017, 2204 of 2017, 2205-2206 OF2017, 2207-2214 OF 2017, 2215-2219 OF 2017, 2220 OF 2017, 2221-2223OF 2017, 2224 OF 2017, 2226-2227 OF 2017, 2228 OF 2017, 2232-2246OF 2017 AND 2249-2279 OF 2017. Date : 21/02/2017 These appeals were called on for pronouncement ofjudgment today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv.Mr. V.Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Batra,Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.

Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv.Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.15 Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv.Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv. Mrs.Amita Gupta,Adv.Ms. Neha Tyagi,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv.Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia,Sr.Adv.Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv.Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAGDr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv.Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,AAGMr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. **** Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goelpronounced the judgment of the Bench comprising of HisLordship and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit.Interlocutory application for impleadment isrejected.Application for deletion of proformarespondents is allowed.Application for discharge of guardian isallowed.The appeals are allowed in terms of the signedreportable judgment. All other pending applications shall also stand16disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master(Signed reportable judgment is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).1587-1636/2017 SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With application(s) for impleadment as Party Respondent and Office Report) WITH C.A. No. 1637/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1638-1653/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1655-1658/2017 (Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1659-1663/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1664/2017 (Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1665-1669/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1670-1675/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1677-1691/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1692/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1693/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1694/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1695/2017 (Office Report) 1

C.A. No. 1696/2017 (Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1699-1701/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1702/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 1703-1780/2017 (Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 1783-1852/2017 (Directions and Office Report) C.A. No. 1853-1927/2017 (Directions and Office Report) C.A. No. 1930-2003/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2004-2058/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2059-2111/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2112-2114/2017 (Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2117-2118/2017 (With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report) C.A. No. 2123-2126/2017 (With appln.(s) for discharge of guardian and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) C.A. No. 2127-2128/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2129-2132/2017 (Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2133-2138/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2139-2143/2017 (With appln.(s) for discharge of guardian and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) C.A. No. 2144-2145/2017 (Office Report) 2

C.A. No. 2146-2200/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2201-2203/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2204/2017 (With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report) C.A. No. 2205-2206/2017 (With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report) C.A. No. 2207-2214/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2215-2219/2017 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2220/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2221-2223/2017 (With (With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report) C.A. No. 2224/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2226-2227/2017 (Interim Relief) C.A. No. 2228/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2232-2246/2017 (Office Report) C.A. No. 2249-2279/2017 (Office Report) Date : 09/02/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Appellant(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. 3

Ms. Usha Nandini. V, AOR Mr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Rekha Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. L. Hasan, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar, AOR Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Ms. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR Mr. Siddharth Batra, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, AOR Mr. S. K. Sinha, AOR Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Manoj Joshi, Adv. Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, AOR Mr. Annam D. N. Rao, AOR Mr. Abhishek Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Kushank Sindhu, Adv. Annam Venkatesh Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Varsha Rana, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Ms. Tanya Swarup, Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta, AOR Ms. Neha Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. S. Jhanwar, Adv. Mr. M. S. Varma, Adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, AG Mr. Alok Sangwan, AAG 4

Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Ashish Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR Ms. Priya Watwani, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, AAG Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Karanvir Singh Khehar, Adv. Mr. Parveen, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties at length. Hearing concluded. Judgment reserved. (RASHI GUPTA) SR.P.A. (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER Books cited : 1. (1995) 2 SCC 326 2. (1980) 3 SCC 223 3. (2011) 2 SCC 54 4. (1995) 1 SCC 221 5. (2013) 14 SCC 506 6. AIR (1998) SC 1164 7. (1986) 2 SCC 343 8. Land Acquisition Act 5

L%ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal No(s).1587-1636/2017SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With application(s) for impleadment as Party Respondent and OfficeReport)WITHC.A. No. 1637/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1638-1653/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1655-1658/2017(Interim Relief and Office Report)C.A. No. 1659-1663/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1664/2017(Interim Relief and Office Report)C.A. No. 1665-1669/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1670-1675/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1677-1691/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1692/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1693/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1694/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1695/2017(Office Report)1C.A. No. 1696/2017(Interim Relief and Office Report)C.A. No. 1699-1701/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1702/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 1703-1780/2017(Interim Relief and Office Report)C.A. No. 1783-1852/2017(Directions and Office Report)C.A. No. 1853-1927/2017(Directions and Office Report)C.A. No. 1930-2003/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2004-2058/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2059-2111/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2112-2114/2017(Interim Relief and Office Report)C.A. No. 2117-2118/2017(With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report)C.A. No. 2123-2126/2017(With appln.(s) for discharge of guardian and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)C.A. No. 2127-2128/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2129-2132/2017(Interim Relief and Office Report)C.A. No. 2133-2138/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2139-2143/2017

(With appln.(s) for discharge of guardian and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)C.A. No. 2144-2145/2017(Office Report)2C.A. No. 2146-2200/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2201-2203/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2204/2017(With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report)C.A. No. 2205-2206/2017(With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report)C.A. No. 2207-2214/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2215-2219/2017(With Office Report)C.A. No. 2220/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2221-2223/2017(With (With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and Office Report)C.A. No. 2224/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2226-2227/2017(Interim Relief)C.A. No. 2228/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2232-2246/2017(Office Report)C.A. No. 2249-2279/2017(Office Report) Date : 09/02/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Appellant(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv.Mr. Surender Singh, Adv.Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv.3Ms. Usha Nandini. V, AORMr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv.Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal, Adv.Ms. Rekha Dwivedi, Adv.Mr. L. Hasan, Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar, AORMs. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv.Ms. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta, Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR Mr. Siddharth Batra, Adv.Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma, AOR Mr. S. K. Sinha, AORMr. Gagan Gupta, AORMr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv.Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv.Mr. Manoj Joshi, Adv.Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, AOR Mr. Annam D. N. Rao, AORMr. Abhishek Agarwal, Adv.Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv.

Kushank Sindhu, Adv.Annam VenkateshMr. Rahul Mishra, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv.Ms. Varsha Rana, Adv.Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr. Ankit Swarup, AORMs. Tanya Swarup, Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta, AORMs. Neha Tyagi, Adv.Mr. Tarun Gupta, AORMr. S. Jhanwar, Adv.Mr. M. S. Varma, Adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, AGMr. Alok Sangwan, AAG4Dr. Monika Gusain, AORMr. P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv.Mr. A. K. Thakur, Adv.Mr. Ashish Chauhan, Adv.Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AORMs. Priya Watwani, Adv.Mr. Amit Kumar, AAG Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AORMr. Karanvir Singh Khehar, Adv.Mr. Parveen, Adv.Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard learned counsel appearing for the parties at length.Hearing concluded.Judgment reserved. (RASHI GUPTA) SR.P.A. (SUMAN JAIN)COURT MASTERBooks cited :1. (1995) 2 SCC 3262. (1980) 3 SCC 2233. (2011) 2 SCC 544. (1995) 1 SCC 2215. (2013) 14 SCC 5066. AIR (1998) SC 11647. (1986) 2 SCC 3438. Land Acquisition Act 5

1 REVISED ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3086-3135/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2407/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2413/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2416/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2419/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2439/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2440/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2442/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2451/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3106/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3127/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3179/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3209/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3359/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3385/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3401/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3743/2015, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4052/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4057/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4118/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4119/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4312/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4315/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4316/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4326/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4334/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4337/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4343/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4368/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4597/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4599/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4600/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4601/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4605/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4607/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4624/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4625/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4712/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4714/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4716/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4736/2012, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4830/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4838/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5943/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 622/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 623/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 625/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6255/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6292/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6317/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6324/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment as party respondent and permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 3067-3082/2016

2 (With appln. For exemption from filing O.T. and permission to submit addl. Documents and office Report) SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5444-5448/2016 (with appln. For exem. From filing c/c of the impugned order and office Report) SLP(C) No. 3661/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7086-7090/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10365-10370/2016 (with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8199-8213/2016 (with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report) SLP(C) No. 14641/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28334/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28330/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28326/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18746/2016 (With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18747-18749/2016 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18577/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/2016

3 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and for substitution and permission to file SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28287-28289/2016 (With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29366-29367/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29340-29343/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29473-29474/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28291-28294/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 19034-19039/2016 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 18893-18897/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 31831-31832/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32788-32842/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21543-21545/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21783/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21984-21985/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 33902-33909/2014 (With Office Report)

4 SLP(C) No. 36077-36081/2016 (With appln.(s) for substitution and for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38548/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21439-21441/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 25201/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2605-2606/2017 (With interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 2772/2017 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14595-14609/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C)... CC No. 263-293/2017 (with appln. For c/delay in filing substitution appln. And permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 07/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. S.J. Amith,Adv. Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,AOR. Mr. Dhruv Mehta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal,Adv.

5 Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda,Adv. Ms. Gurvinder Suri,Adv. Mr. L.S. Hasan,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Batra,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manoj Joshi,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Goyal,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms. Varsha Rana,Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv. Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. Jhanwar,Adv. Mr. M.S. Varma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwali,Sr.Adv. Mr. A.K. Thakur,Adv. Mr. Ashish Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. Ms. Priya Watwani,Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAG Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,AAG. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.

6 Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Karanveer Singh Khehar,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in the special leave petition(s). Delay in filing the application(s) for substitution is condoned and substitution(s) is allowed. Permission to file the special leave petition is granted. Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants. Arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant are concluded. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned Additional Solicitor General, is in difficulty to argue the matter today. The matters are adjourned to be listed on Thursday, the 9 th February, 2017, to enable Mr. Patwalia to make his submission. (Mahabir Singh) ( Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

7 ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3086-3135/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2407/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2413/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2416/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2419/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2439/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2440/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2442/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2451/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3106/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3127/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3179/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3209/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3359/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3385/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3401/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3743/2015, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4052/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4057/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4118/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4119/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4312/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4315/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4316/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4326/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4334/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4337/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4343/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4368/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4597/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4599/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4600/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4601/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4605/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4607/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4624/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4625/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4712/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4714/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4716/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4736/2012, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4830/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4838/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5943/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 622/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 623/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 625/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6255/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6292/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6317/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6324/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment as party respondent and permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 3067-3082/2016 (With appln. For exemption from filing O.T. and permission to

8 submit addl. Documents and office Report) SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5444-5448/2016 (with appln. For exem. From filing c/c of the impugned order and office Report) SLP(C) No. 3661/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7086-7090/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10365-10370/2016 (with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8199-8213/2016 (with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report) SLP(C) No. 14641/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28334/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28330/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28326/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18746/2016 (With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18747-18749/2016 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18577/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)

9 S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and for substitution and permission to file SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28287-28289/2016 (With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29366-29367/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29340-29343/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29473-29474/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28291-28294/2016 (with interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 19034-19039/2016 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 18893-18897/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 31831-31832/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32788-32842/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21543-21545/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21783/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21984-21985/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 33902-33909/2014 Office Report)

11 Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda,Adv. Ms. Gurvinder Suri,Adv. Mr. L.S. Hasan,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Batra,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manoj Joshi,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Goyal,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms. Varsha Rana,Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv. Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. Jhanwar,Adv. Mr. M.S. Varma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Patwali,Sr.Adv. Mr. A.K. Thakur,Adv. Mr. Ashish Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. Ms. Priya Watwani,Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAG Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,AAG. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.

12 Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Karanveer Singh Khehar,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in the special leave petition(s). Delay in filing the application(s) for substitution is condoned and substitution(s) is allowed. Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants. Arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant are concluded. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned Additional Solicitor General, is in difficulty to argue the matter today. The matters are adjourned to be listed on Thursday, the 9 th February, 2017, to enable Mr. Patwalia to make his submission. (Mahabir Singh) ( Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

SECTION IVB Suppl. Listed on 07.02.2017 Court No. 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 10 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 30863135 OF 2016 3390233909 OF 2014, 10832 OF 2015, 3082, 10342, 5448, 41524155, 3661, 70867090, 1804318117, 1036510370, 1773417803, 18746, 28334, 28330, 14609, 18577, 28326, 14641, 2936629367, 29340343, 3607781, 2947374, 1874749, 31831832, 2829194, 32788842, 38548 OF 2016, 260506, 2772 OF 2017 AND CC Nos.740976, 8199213, 12624678, 1192211974, 18893897, 1903439, 21984985, 21543545, 21439441, 21783 and 25201 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.9 (Application for impleadment as party respondent in SLP (C) No. 3121 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.10 (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 11 (Application for exemption from filing official translation) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.168 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP in SLP (C) CC No. 740976 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.138 (Application for permission to file SLP in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.3955 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioners in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 5672 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 103172/2016 (Application for direction in SLP (C) No. 17734803/2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2526 in SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014 (Application for substitution) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2728 in SLP (C) No. - 1 -

3390233909/2014 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP (C) Nos.30863135/2016 and 306782/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file special leave petitions, filed by the LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications is condoned. Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc. ], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form.” SLP (C) Nos.30863135/2016 It is submitted that notice issued to Respondent Nos. 18. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 13. Neither AD Cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from Respondent Nos. 48 so far. - 2 -

It is further submitted that Mr. Vipin Kumar Jain, Advocate has on 05.09.2016 filed application for impleadment/respondent, application for permission to file additional documents and application for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure A5 and the same have been registered as I.A. Nos. 9, 10 & 11 and being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that cause title has been amended accordingly and included in SLP paper books. SLP (C) Nos.306782/2016 It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, show cause notice was issued on 09.03.2016 to all the respondents. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 (State of Haryana) in all the matters. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance along with Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 in SLP (C) No. 3067, 3069, and Respondnet No. 4 in SLP (C) No. 3071, 3073 and Respondent No. 3 in SLP (C) No. 3075, 3077, 3079 & 3081 of 2016. The same has been included in the SLP paper books. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from respondent nos. 35 so far. SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. I.A. for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos. 3390233909 of 2014 (@ CC Nos. 1854218549 of 2014).” It is submitted that there are total 14 respondents - 3 -

and Respondent Nos. 3 to 14 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Court's order dated 13.04.2015. It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 & 2 which is barred by time by 37 days as per Court's order dated 16.02.2016. He has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. It is also submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of service the pleadings to the Counsel for the respondents so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 04.07.2016, when the following Order was passed: “ The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner 33902has failed to serve the copy of the pleadings to both the respondents for filing the counter affidavit. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court with appropriate office report.” SLP (C) Nos. 10265342/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” The matter above mentioned was listed before the - 4 -

Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) Nos. 41524155, 54445448/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.30673082 of 2016. Compensation as determined by the Reference Court be paid to the land owners.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matters above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016. SLP (C) No. 3661/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. SLP (C) No. 70867090/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the - 5 -

Hon'ble Court on 08.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.........CC Nos.25852586/2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. SLP (C) Nos. 1036510370/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matters above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 54445448 of 2016. Cause title has been amended accordingly and also included in SLP paper books. SLP (C) No. 17734803/2016 and 18043117/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ Permission to file SLPs is granted. - 6 -

Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. ” It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate for the petitioner has filed application for direction which is registered as I.A. Nos. 103172. The same is circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that Cause title has been amended accordingly and included in the SLP paper books. SLP (C) CC No. 740976/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) No. CC No. 81998213/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 02.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP(C)No. 10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the - 7 -

petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned matters are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. SLP (C) Nos. 28334, 28330, 28326 and 18577/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file SLPs is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned SLPs are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.07.2016 filed an application for directions. The same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that pursuant to the above order, proforma Respondent No. 4 has been deleted from the array of parties in SLP (C) No. 28326/2016. SLP (C) No. 18746/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to - 8 -

pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (Civil) Nos. 1459514609/2016. ” It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the respondents. Service of show cause notice is not complete. SLP (C) Nos. 2828728289 and 2829128294/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.30673082/2016 .” The matters above mentioned alongwith connected matters except SLP (C) Nos. 2828789 and 2829194 of 2016 were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016, when inter alia the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ SLP(C)Nos.3390233909/2014,10832/2015,306730 82/2016, 41524155/2016, 5444 5448/2016, 3661/2016, 70867090/2016, 10365 10370/2016, 18577/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos. 8199 8213/2016, 11339/2016,11499/2016 and 8883/2016 List these matters on 27th September, 2016...” SLP (C) Nos.2947329474 and 2936629367 of 2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.30673082/2016.” SLP (C) No. 2934043 of 2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the - 9 -

Hon'ble Court on 23.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Application(s) for substitution is/are allowed. Application(s) for deletion of proforma respondents is/are allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.30673082/2016. ” SLP (C) No. 3183132 of 2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 03.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)No.18577/2016.” SLP (C) No. 32788842 of 2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The application(s) for substitution is/are allowed. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of SLP(C)....CC Nos.25852586 of 2016.” SLP (C) CC Nos. 1889397 and 1903439 of 2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ To be taken up along with CC No.11331148/2016, which is noted for listing on 22.11.2016. Implementation of the impugned judgments qua remanding the matters to the Reference Court is stayed. The petitioners are directed to serve a copy of the petitions upon the Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana.” - 10 -

It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioners has filed proof of serving the copy of the petitions upon the standing counsel for the State of Haryana in CC No. 1889397 of 2016 only. SLP (C) No. 3067781/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Permission to file SLP is granted. Issue notice on the applications of condonation of delay in filing substitution application, substitution and special leave petition. Application for deletion of proforma respondent is allowed. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.1459514609/2016.” It is submitted that there are 4 respondents in this matter and show cause notice was issued on 23.12.2016. As per tracking report, service of show cause notice is not complete on all the respondents. SLP (C) CC Nos. 21439441, 21783, 21984985 and 2154345/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file SLP granted. Abatement, if any, is set aside. Delay condoned in filing substitution application(s). Application(s) for substitution is allowed. To be heard after the judgment in Special Leave Petition(C) No.10832 of 2015 and other connected matters is delivered. Proceedings pending before the Trial Court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per - 11 -

judgment dated 2nd July, 2013 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limiterd Vs. Udal & Others etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. Tag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.85898603 of 2016.” The SLP (C) CC Nos. 21439441 of 2016 were again listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Heard. Put up on Tuesday, the 7th February, 2017 along with SLP(C)No(s).30863135 of 2016 and connected matters.” SLP (C) No. 1459514609/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file the special leave petition in CC No. 8805 of 2016 is granted. Delay condoned. The application for substitution is allowed. To be heard after the judgement in Special Leave Petition(C) No. 10832 of 2015 and other connected matters is delivered. Proceedings pending before the Trial Court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited versus Udal & Others etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. ” It is submitted that this is a fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) No. 38548/2016 - 12 -

The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.12.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) ...CC Nos.46144691 of 2016.” It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the 4 respondents. Service of show cause notice is awaited. SLP (C) No. 260506/2017 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 04.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. Tag with SLP(C) No.10832/2015 and other connected matters. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed.” It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the respondents. Service of show cause notice is awaited. SLP (C) CC No.25201/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ To be heard along with SLP(C) Nos.3390233909/2014, SLP(C) No.30863135/2016 and other connected matters which are coming up for hearing on 07.02.2017.” SLP (C) No. 2772/2017 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to - 13 -

pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag along with SLP(c) Nos. 54445448 of 2016 and other connected matters, which cases are coming up for hearing on 17.02.2017. Standing counsel for the State of Haryana be also served. The Registry is directed to list the matters on 17.02.2017 irrespective of whether service is complete in all matters or not. ” It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed complete set of spare copies. Hence, show cause notice could not be issued. SLP (C) CC No. 12624678/2016 and 11922974/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” SLP (C) CC No. 12624678/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) CC No. 11922974/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP(C) Nos.3390233909/2014 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.12.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ It is informed that this case is covered by - 14 -

the decision of this Court in “Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs. Udal and others etc. Etc.” reported in (2013) 14 SCC 506 decided on 2nd July, 2013. Issue notice both on the application for condonation of delay as well as SLP returnable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents through registered A.D. Post. Service positions of each SLP is as under: SLP Total Resp. Service Thr. Dasti/A.D V/A Neither A.D Remarks 33902 5 15 Complete 33903 1 1 Complete 33904 1 1 Complete 33905 1 1 Complete 33906 1 Incomplete as sole Resp. (dead) 33907 15 16,8,14,15 913 Incomplete R7 (Dead) 33908 1 1 Complete 33909 1 1 Complete It is further submitted that now Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 have been reported to be dead and notice was directed to be issued on I.A. for substitution in respect of above said respondents vide Hon'ble Chamber Judge order dated 04.04.2016. But Counsel for the petitioner has filed spare copy barred by time by eight days and office report for direction has been updated in Chamber Pool. Service of show cause notice is incomplete in respect of sole respondent in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014. It is further submitted that the matter above - 15 -

mentioned was laslty listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.12.2016 along with connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.81998213 of 2016, SLP (C)Nos.30863135/2016, SLP(C) Nos.1026510342/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.83658434/2016, SLP(C) Nos. 1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.1262412678/2016 and SLP(C)...CC Nos.1192211974/2016. It has been agreed between the parties that SLP (C) Nos.30863135/2016 and SLP (C) Nos.1026510342/2016 be treated as the leading cases and the pleadings be completed. List all other matters along with these Special Leave Petitions on 07.02.2017. ” The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 06th day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip/Mty - 16 -

@\2071REVISEDITEM NO.10 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3086-3135/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2407/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2413/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2416/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2419/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2439/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2440/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2442/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2451/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3106/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3127/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3179/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3209/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3359/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3385/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3401/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3743/2015, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4052/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4057/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4118/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4119/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4312/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4315/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4316/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4326/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4334/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4337/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4343/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4368/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4597/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4599/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4600/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4601/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4605/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4607/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4624/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4625/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4712/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4714/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4716/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4736/2012, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4830/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4838/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 5943/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 622/2011, 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 623/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 625/2011, 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 6255/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6292/2011, 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 6317/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6324/2011 passed by theHigh Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment asparty respondent and permission to file additional documents andoffice report)WITHSLP(C) No. 10832/2015(with office report) SLP(C) No. 3067-3082/20162(With appln. For exemption from filing O.T. and permission tosubmit addl. Documents and office Report) SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5444-5448/2016(with appln. For exem. From filing c/c of the impugned order andoffice Report)SLP(C) No. 3661/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 7086-7090/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 10365-10370/2016(with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8199-8213/2016(with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report) SLP(C) No. 14641/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28334/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28330/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28326/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18746/2016

(With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18747-18749/2016Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18577/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/2016(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/20163(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and forsubstitution and permission to file SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28287-28289/2016(With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29366-29367/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 29340-29343/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 29473-29474/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 28291-28294/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 19034-19039/2016(With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for permission tofile SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 18893-18897/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and substitution and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 31831-31832/2016(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and substitution andappln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32788-32842/2016(With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21543-21545/2016(With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21783/2016(With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21984-21985/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 33902-33909/2014(With Office Report)4SLP(C) No. 36077-36081/2016(With appln.(s) for substitution and for c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and permission to file SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38548/2016(With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21439-21441/2016(With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 25201/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2605-2606/2017(With interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 2772/2017(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 14595-14609/2016(with Office Report)SLP(C)... CC No. 263-293/2017

(with appln. For c/delay in filing substitution appln. Andpermission to file SLP and substitution and office report)Date : 07/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. S.J. Amith,Adv.Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv.Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,AOR.Mr. Dhruv Mehta,Sr.Adv.Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal,Adv.5Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda,Adv.Ms. Gurvinder Suri,Adv.Mr. L.S. Hasan,Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Batra,Adv.Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv.Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv.Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv.Mr. Manoj Joshi,Adv.Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.Mr. Abhishek Agarwal,Adv.Mr. Sudipto Sircar,Adv.Mr. Rahul Mishra,Adv.Mr. Abhinav Goyal,Adv.Mr. Annam Venkatesh,Adv.Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv.Ms. Varsha Rana,Adv.Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv.Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv.Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv.Mr. S. Jhanwar,Adv.Mr. M.S. Varma,Adv.For Respondent(s)Mr. P.S. Patwali,Sr.Adv.Mr. A.K. Thakur,Adv.Mr. Ashish Chauhan,Adv.Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv.Ms. Priya Watwani,Adv.Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAGDr. Monika Gusain,Adv.Mr. Amit Kumar,AAG.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.6Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Karanveer Singh Khehar,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in the special leave petition(s).Delay in filing the application(s) for substitution iscondoned and substitution(s) is allowed. Permission to file thespecial leave petition is granted.Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel for the appellants.Arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel for theappellant are concluded.Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned Additional Solicitor General, is indifficulty to argue the matter today. The matters are adjourned to be listed on Thursday, the 9 thFebruary, 2017, to enable Mr. Patwalia to make his submission.(Mahabir Singh) ( Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master7ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3086-3135/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2407/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2413/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2416/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2419/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2439/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2440/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2442/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2451/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3106/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3127/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3179/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3209/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3359/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3385/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3401/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3743/2015, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4052/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4057/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4118/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4119/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4312/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4315/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4316/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4326/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4334/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4337/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4343/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4368/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4597/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4599/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4600/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4601/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4605/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4607/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4624/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4625/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4712/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4714/2011, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4716/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4736/2012, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4830/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4838/2010, 06/10/2015in RFA No. 5943/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 622/2011, 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 623/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 625/2011, 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 6255/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6292/2011, 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 6317/2011, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6324/2011 passed by theHigh Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment asparty respondent and permission to file additional documents andoffice report)WITHSLP(C) No. 10832/2015(with office report) SLP(C) No. 3067-3082/2016(With appln. For exemption from filing O.T. and permission to8submit addl. Documents and office Report) SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5444-5448/2016(with appln. For exem. From filing c/c of the impugned order andoffice Report)

SLP(C) No. 3661/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 7086-7090/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 10365-10370/2016(with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8199-8213/2016(with appln. for c/dealy in filing SLP and office Report) SLP(C) No. 14641/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28334/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28330/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28326/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18746/2016(With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18747-18749/2016Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18577/2016(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/2016(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)9S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and forsubstitution and permission to file SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28287-28289/2016(With interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29366-29367/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 29340-29343/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 29473-29474/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 28291-28294/2016(with interim Relief and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 19034-19039/2016(With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for permission tofile SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 18893-18897/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and substitution and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 31831-31832/2016(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and substitution andappln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32788-32842/2016(With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21543-21545/2016(With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21783/2016(With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21984-21985/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 33902-33909/2014Office Report)

10SLP(C) No. 36077-36081/2016(With appln.(s) for substitution and for c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and permission to file SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38548/2016(With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21439-21441/2016(With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 25201/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2605-2606/2017(With interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 2772/2017(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 14595-14609/2016(with Office Report)SLP(C)... CC No. 263-293/2017(with appln. For c/delay in filing substitution appln. Andpermission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 07/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. S.J. Amith,Adv.Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv.Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,AOR.Mr. Dhruv Mehta,Sr.Adv.Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.11Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal,Adv.Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda,Adv.Ms. Gurvinder Suri,Adv.Mr. L.S. Hasan,Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Batra,Adv.Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv.Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv.Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv.Mr. Manoj Joshi,Adv.Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.Mr. Abhishek Agarwal,Adv.Mr. Sudipto Sircar,Adv.Mr. Rahul Mishra,Adv.Mr. Abhinav Goyal,Adv.Mr. Annam Venkatesh,Adv.Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv.Ms. Varsha Rana,Adv.Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv.Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv.Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv.Mr. S. Jhanwar,Adv.

Mr. M.S. Varma,Adv.For Respondent(s)Mr. P.S. Patwali,Sr.Adv.Mr. A.K. Thakur,Adv.Mr. Ashish Chauhan,Adv.Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv.Ms. Priya Watwani,Adv.Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAGDr. Monika Gusain,Adv.Mr. Amit Kumar,AAG.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.12Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Karanveer Singh Khehar,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in the special leave petition(s).Delay in filing the application(s) for substitution iscondoned and substitution(s) is allowed.Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel for the appellants.Arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel for theappellant are concluded.Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned Additional Solicitor General, is indifficulty to argue the matter today. The matters are adjourned to be listed on Thursday, the 9 thFebruary, 2017, to enable Mr. Patwalia to make his submission.(Mahabir Singh) ( Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...... CC Nos. 263-293/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1273/2014, RFA No. 1508/2014, RFA No. 1817/2014, RFA No. 1818/2014, RFA No. 1819/2014, RFA No. 2067/2014, RFA No. 2070/2014, RFA No. 2071/2014, RFA No. 2072/2014, RFA No. 2073/2014, RFA No. 2076/2014, RFA No. 2266/2014, RFA No. 3734/2014, RFA No. 4009/2014, RFA No. 4020/2014, RFA No. 4027/2014, RFA No. 4038/2014, RFA No. 4043/2014, RFA No. 4044/2014, RFA No. 4052/2014, RFA No. 4400/2014, RFA No. 4424/2013, RFA No. 5198/2014, RFA No. 5321/2014, CO No. 63/2014, RFA No. 6369/2013, CO No. 65/2015, RFA No. 69/2014, RFA No. 7115/2013, RFA No. 7275/2013 and RFA No. 8186/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) RANBIR SINGH ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file SLP, substitution, c/delay in filing substitution application and office report) Date : 03/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with SLP (C)Nos. 14595-14609 of 2016 and other connected matters. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

SECTION IV B Listed on 3.2.2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.8 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 20 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.141 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.4255 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioner) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.5669 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO.263293 OF 2017 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) Ranbir Singh and Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 28.10.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos.6369 of 2013, 8186 of 2014, 4400 of 2014, 4038 of 2014, 1273 of 2014, 4020 of 2014, 4052 of 2014,Cross objection No. 65CI of 2015 in RFA No. 4052 of 2014, 7115 of 2013, 4424 of 2013, 3734 of 2014, 4043 of 2014, 4009 of 2014 and cross objection NO. 63CI of 2014 in RFA NO. 4009 of 2014, 1817 of 2014, 2067 of 2014, 5321 of 2014, 4027 of 2014, 2071 of 2014, 1818 of 2014, 2070 of 2014, 1819 of 2014, 2076 of 2014, 2073 of 2014, 2266 of 2014, 4044 of 2014, 7275 of 2013, 5198 of 2014 and cross objection No. 69CI of

2014 in RFA No. 5198 of 2014, 1508 of 2014 and 2072 of 2014 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased petitioner No. 4 viz. Charni @ Charan Singh in RFA No. 4400/2014 and petitioner No. 3 in RFA No. 4038/2014, petitioner No. 18 viz. Gugan Singh in RFA NO. 4400/2014, petitioner NO. 17 in RFA No. 4038/2014 and RFA No. 4009/2014, petitioner No. 1 viz. Gajraj in RFA NO. 4038/2014, petitioner No. 1 viz. Mahabir in RFA NO. 4052/2014, petitioner viz. Ishwar @ Ishar in RFA No. 7115/2014 and RFA No. 4424/2013, petitioner No. 9 viz. Amar Bai in RFA NO. 4009/2014, petitioner No. 14 viz. Bhagwati in RFA No. 4009/2014, petitioner No. 1 viz. Bijay Singh @ Vijay Singh in RFA No. 2067/2014, petitioner No.1 viz. Gabbu Singh in RFA NO. 1817/2014, petitioner No. 4 viz. Naurang Pal in RFA No. 5321/2014 and petitioner No. 4 in RFA NO. 4027/2014, petitioner No. 5 viz. Bhanwar Pal in RFA No. 4027/2014, petitioner No. 3 viz. Karan Singh in RFA No. 2071/2014 & petitioner No. 2 in RFA NO. 2070 of 2014, petitioner No. 8 viz. Man Singh in RFA No.2076/2014, petitioner NO. 2 viz. Agar Devi in RFA No. 2073/2014 which is barred by time by 297, 543, 3941, 366, 946, 316, 1807, 1767, 197, 1340, 1890, 940, 2897, 2111 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application with prayer for setting aside abatement. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 is barred by time by 294 days in RFA Nos. 1818 and RFA No. 4038 of 2014, 278 days in RFA No.2073 of

2014, 298 days in RFA Nos. 6369 of 2013, RFA nos. 4400, 7115, 4424, 3734, 4043, 2076, 226, 4044, 7275, 5198, 1508, 2072 of 2014, 279 days in RFA NO. 8186 of 2014, 294 days in RFA No. 1273/2014, 290 days in RFA No. 4052/2014, 270 days in RFA No. 4009 of 2014, 291 days in RFA No. 4020 of 2014, 290 days in RFA NO. 1817 and 2067 of 2014, 294 days in RFA No. 2071 of 2014, 295 days in RFA NO. 5321 and 4027 of 2014, 294 days in RFA NO. 2070 and 1819 of 2014 and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C)...CC No.25201/2016 Entitled DHARAMENDER AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS as both are arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 6.1.2017 and directed to be heard along with SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014, SLP (C) No. 30863135/2016.(Copy of order dated 6.1.2017 enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that the SLP (C) No.3661/2016 Entitled Kohli Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Orient Craft Ltd. Versus State of Haryana and Ors. as both are arising out of common order is listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.2.2016 and the court directed to tag with SLP (C) No. 30863135 of 2016. (Main SLP (C) No. 30863135/2016). It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Counsel for the petitioner has on 19.1.2017 filed a letter stating therein that Award/order dated 20.2.2014, 24.1.2007, 10.11.2012, 28.9.2013, 27.8.2013, 17.8.2013, Notification dated 27.9.2005, 2.6.2006, 24.11.2006 and exhibits mentioned in the impugned order is not available and same are not relevant to the adjudication at present and counsel has requested to register and list the matter

at his own risk. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Dr. Kailash Chand, adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

äITEM NO.20 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC Nos. 263-293/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 1273/2014, RFA No. 1508/2014, RFA No. 1817/2014, RFA No.1818/2014, RFA No. 1819/2014, RFA No. 2067/2014, RFA No. 2070/2014,RFA No. 2071/2014, RFA No. 2072/2014, RFA No. 2073/2014, RFA No.2076/2014, RFA No. 2266/2014, RFA No. 3734/2014, RFA No. 4009/2014,RFA No. 4020/2014, RFA No. 4027/2014, RFA No. 4038/2014, RFA No.4043/2014, RFA No. 4044/2014, RFA No. 4052/2014, RFA No. 4400/2014,RFA No. 4424/2013, RFA No. 5198/2014, RFA No. 5321/2014, CO No.63/2014, RFA No. 6369/2013, CO No. 65/2015, RFA No. 69/2014, RFANo. 7115/2013, RFA No. 7275/2013 and RFA No. 8186/2014 passed bythe High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)RANBIR SINGH ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for permission to file SLP, substitution, c/delayin filing substitution application and office report)Date : 03/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTag with SLP (C)Nos. 14595-14609 of 2016 and otherconnected matters. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...... of 2017 CC No(s). 21439-21441/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 256/2012, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4527/2010, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4528/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) LAXMI NARAIN AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC. Respondent(s) I.A.No.......(With directions and office report) Date : 30/01/2017 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv. Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Put up on Tuesday, the 7 th February, 2017 along with SLP(C)No(s).3086-3135 of 2016 and connected matters. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Listed on.30012017 Court No.10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.6 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for direction) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 13 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 21439441 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing official translation) Laxmi Narain & Ors. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Anr. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed alongwith connected matters before the Hon'ble Court on 18.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Permission to file SLP granted. Abatement, if any, is set aside. Delay condoned in filing substitution application(s). Application(s) for substitution is allowed. To be heard after the judgment in Special Leave Petition(C) No.10832 of 2015 and other connected matters is delivered. Proceedings pending before the Trial Court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limiterd Vs. Udal & Others etc.], the

petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. Tag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.85898603 of 2016. ” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 15.12.2016 filed application for direction with affidavit requesting therein to list the present SLP along with SLP (C) No. 10832 of 2015 and/or permit the petitioner to serve the copy of present SLP on respondent through their standing counsel. The unregistered application is circulated before the Hon'ble Court. The matter above mentioned was mentioned before Hon'ble Court on 24.1.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Not to be deleted from the cause list of 30 th January, 2017.” The unregistered application is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Ankit Swarup , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

\204ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...... of 2017CC No(s). 21439-21441/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 256/2012, 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4527/2010, 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 4528/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana AtChandigarh)LAXMI NARAIN AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC. Respondent(s)I.A.No.......(With directions and office report)Date : 30/01/2017 This matter was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankit Swarup,Adv.Ms. Tanya Swarup,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard.Put up on Tuesday, the 7 th February, 2017 along withSLP(C)No(s).3086-3135 of 2016 and connected matters.(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)......CC NO(S). 21439-21441/2016 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 06/10/2015 IN RFA NO. 256/2012, RFA NO. 4527/2010, RFA NO. 4528/2010 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) LAXMI NARAIN AND ORS. ETC. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) Date : 24/01/2017 These petitions were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankit Swarup, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Not to be deleted from the cause list of 30 th January, 2017. [VINOD LAKHINA] COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER

\220ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)......CC NO(S).21439-21441/2016(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 06/10/2015IN RFA NO. 256/2012, RFA NO. 4527/2010, RFA NO. 4528/2010 PASSED BYTHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)LAXMI NARAIN AND ORS. ETC. PETITIONER(S) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC. RESPONDENT(S)Date : 24/01/2017 These petitions were mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankit Swarup, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingO R D E RNot to be deleted from the cause list of 30 thJanuary, 2017. [VINOD LAKHINA]COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI]COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 1231/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5431/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SURENDER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 20/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gutpa, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag along with SLP(c) Nos. 5444-5448 of 2016 and other connected matters, which cases are coming up for hearing on 17.02.2017. Standing counsel for the State of Haryana be also served. The Registry is directed to list the matters on 17.02.2017 irrespective of whether service is complete in all matters or not. (Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Listed on 20.1.2017 Court No.8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.38 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO.1231 OF 2017 AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order) Surender Singh ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, Advocate on 2.1.2017 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 5431/2011(O&M) barred by time by 364 days along with the applications for condonation of delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.38548/2016 @ CC 24104/2016 Entitled Devinder Kumar Madan Versus Commissioner and Secy. And Ors. arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.12.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to issue of notice. The said SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 16.12.2016 is enclosed herewith). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 17th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr.Ram Naresh Yadav, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

6ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s).1231/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 5431/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)SURENDER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 20/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gutpa, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Issue notice. Tag along with SLP(c) Nos. 5444-5448 of 2016 and otherconnected matters, which cases are coming up for hearing on17.02.2017. Standing counsel for the State of Haryana be also served. The Registry is directed to list the matters on 17.02.2017irrespective of whether service is complete in all matters or not.(Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 25201/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2234/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) DHARAMENDER AND OTHERS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 06/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R To be heard along with SLP(C) Nos.33902-33909/2014, SLP(C) No.3086-3135/2016 and other connected matters which are coming up for hearing on 07.02.2017. (SWETA DHYANI) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Listed on 06.01.2017 Court No.8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.33 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 25201 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Dharmender & Ors Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mrs. Amita Gupta, Advocate on 02.12.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 2234/2011 barred by time by 333 days along with the application for condonation of delay in filing SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No. 18577/2016 Entitled RATI RAM AND ORS. vs HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. arising out of common followed Judgment was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.12.2016, when the Hon'ble Court directed to Tag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.81998213 of 2016, SLP (C) Nos.30863135/2016, SLP (C) Nos.1026510342/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.83658434/2016, SLP (C) Nos.1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.1262412678/2016 and SLP(C)...CC Nos.1192211974/2016 and further directed to list on 07.02.2017. SLP is pending. (Copy of order dated 06.12.2016 is enclosed herewith). Main Matter SC 3390233909/2014.

The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 05th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mrs. Amita Gupta, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip/chetan

æITEM NO.33 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s).25201/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2234/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)DHARAMENDER AND OTHERS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 06/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTo be heard along with SLP(C) Nos.33902-33909/2014,SLP(C) No.3086-3135/2016 and other connected matters which arecoming up for hearing on 07.02.2017. (SWETA DHYANI) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 24695-24696/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2874/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3072/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) RAMESH & ORS. ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS HSIDC & ANR. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 04/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. Jhanwar, Adv. Mr. G.R. Naik, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. Tag with SLP(C) No.10832/2015 and other connected matters. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. (SWETA DHYANI) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Listed on.04.01.2017 Court No. 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 26 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.12 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 24695696 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Ramesh Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus H.S.D.C & Anr. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate on 17.11.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 3072 of 2012 and 2874 of 2013 barred by time by 318 days along with the application for condonation of delay in filing SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No. 30863135 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 14031452 of 2016 Entitled S atish Kumar Gupta And Etc. Etc. Vs State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. arising out of common Order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to issue of notice. The said SLP is pending after notice.(Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that SLP (C) Nos. 30673082 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 11331148 of 2016 Entitled Bodan And Ors. Etc. Etc. Vs State Of Haryana Through Hsidc Imt And Ors. Etc. arising out of common Order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to issue of notice. The said SLP is pending

after notice.(Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is enclosed herewith). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 02nd day January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Tarun Gupta , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

ÌITEM NO.26 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s).24695-24696/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2874/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3072/2012 passed by theHigh Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)RAMESH & ORS. ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUSHSIDC & ANR. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 04/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. Jhanwar, Adv. Mr. G.R. Naik, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks.Tag with SLP(C) No.10832/2015 and other connectedmatters.Proceedings pending before the trial court shallremain stayed. (SWETA DHYANI) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....CC No.24104/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.3382/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) DEVINDER KUMAR MADAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 16/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. M.P. Singh, Adv. Ms. Mandira Dubey, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) ...CC Nos.4614-4691 of 2016. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) COURT MASTER (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER

NITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....CC No.24104/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.3382/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana AtChandigarh)DEVINDER KUMAR MADAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSCOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 16/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv.Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. M.P. Singh, Adv.Ms. Mandira Dubey, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) ...CC Nos.4614-4691 of 2016.(ASHAÂ SUNDRIYAL)COURTÂ MASTER (CHANDERÂ BALA)COURTÂ MASTER

1 ITEM NO.23+35 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS In Item No.23 Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33902-33909/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA Nos.1437-1444/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No.10832/2015 (With Office Report) WTH SLP(C) Nos.3067-3082/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.4152-4155/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.5444-5448/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) No.3661/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.7086-7090/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.10365-10370/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C)...CC Nos.8199-8213/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) No.28334/2016 WITH SLP(C) No.28330/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) No.28326/2016 (With Office Report) WITH

2 SLP(C) No.18577/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.28287-28289/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.29366-29367/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.29340-29343/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.29473-29474/2016 (With Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.28291-28294/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) WITH SLP(C)...CC Nos.19034-19039/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) WITH SLP(C)...CC Nos.18893-18897/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.31831-31832/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file SLP and substitution and Office Report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.32788-32842/2016 (With Office Report) In Item No.35 SLP (C) Nos.3086-3135/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment as party respondent and permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP (C) Nos.10265-10342/2016 (With interim relief and office report) WITH SLP (C) Nos.17734-17803/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and office report) WITH SLP (C) Nos.18043-18117/2016 (appln.(s) for directions) WITH SLP (C)...CC Nos.7409-7476/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH

3 SLP (C) ...CC Nos.12624-12678/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) WITH SLP (C)...CC Nos.11922-11974/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. And permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 06/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI Counsel for parties: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini. V, Adv. Mrs. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta, Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr.Adv. Mr. A.K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Ashish Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Goyal, Adv. Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Adv. Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal,Adv. Ms. Rekha Dwivedi, Adv. Mrs. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Anupam Yadav, Adv.

4 Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Batra, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Adv. Mr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla, Adv. For Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. For Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Karan Vir Singh Khehar, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.8199-8213 of 2016, SLP (C) Nos.3086-3135/2016, SLP (C) Nos.10265-10342/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.8365-8434/2016, SLP (C) Nos.18043-18117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.7409-7476/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.12624-12678/2016 and SLP(C)...CC Nos.11922-11974/2016. It has been agreed between the parties that SLP (C) Nos.3086-3135/2016 and SLP (C) Nos.10265-10342/2016 be treated as the leading cases and the pleadings be completed. List all other matters along with these Special Leave Petitions on 07.02.2017. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Listed on.06.12.2016 Court No.11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.35 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 30863135, 10265342,17734803, 18043117 OF 2016 CC NOS. 740976, 12624678 AND 11922974 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.9 (Application for impleadment as party respondent in SLP (C) No. 3121 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.10 (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 11 (Application for exemption from filing official translation) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.168 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP in SLP (C) CC No. 740976 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.138 (Application for permission to file SLP in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.3955 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioners in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 5672 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 103172/2016 (Application for direction in SLP (C) No. 17734803/2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 206279/2016 (Application for direction in SLP (C) No. 1804318117/2016) Satish Kumar Gupta & Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s)

OFFICE REPORT The matterS above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ I n view of letters circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners, list these matters on 6th December, 2016. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of Maruti Suzuki India Limited submits that in some of the matters a copy of the petition has not been served. As a result, reply, if any, has not been filed in these cases. In view of the above, we direct the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners to serve a copy of the petition to Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR appearing for Maruti Suzuki India Limited without fail. Liberty is granted to the learned counsel for the parties to complete the pleadings in the meantime, if not already completed” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed any proof of SLP on Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Advocate for Maruti Suzuki till dated in the matters above mentioned. The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 5 th day December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai , Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/neeraj

Ò(1ITEM NO.23+35 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIn Item No.23Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33902-33909/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011in RFA Nos.1437-1444/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab &Haryana At Chandigarh)HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)WITHSLP(C) No.10832/2015(With Office Report)WTHSLP(C) Nos.3067-3082/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.4152-4155/2016(With Interim Relief and Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.5444-5448/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) No.3661/2016(With Interim Relief and Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.7086-7090/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.10365-10370/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C)...CC Nos.8199-8213/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) No.28334/2016WITHSLP(C) No.28330/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) No.28326/2016(With Office Report)WITH2SLP(C) No.18577/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.28287-28289/2016(With Interim Relief and Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.29366-29367/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.29340-29343/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.29473-29474/2016(With Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.28291-28294/2016(With Interim Relief and Office Report)WITHSLP(C)...CC Nos.19034-19039/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and substitution and office report)

WITHSLP(C)...CC Nos.18893-18897/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and substitution and office report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.31831-31832/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission tofile SLP and substitution and Office Report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.32788-32842/2016(With Office Report)In Item No.35SLP (C) Nos.3086-3135/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment asparty respondent and permission to file additional documents andoffice report)WITHSLP (C) Nos.10265-10342/2016(With interim relief and office report)WITHSLP (C) Nos.17734-17803/2016(With appln.(s) for directions and office report)WITHSLP (C) Nos.18043-18117/2016(appln.(s) for directions)WITHSLP (C)...CC Nos.7409-7476/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITH3SLP (C) ...CC Nos.12624-12678/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and substitution and office report)WITH SLP (C)...CC Nos.11922-11974/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. Andpermission to file SLP and substitution and office report)Date : 06/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHICounsel for parties:Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv.For Ms. Usha Nandini. V, Adv.Mrs. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv.Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta, Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr.Adv.Mr. A.K. Thakur, Adv.Mr. Ashish Chauhan, Adv.Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Adv.Mr. Alok Sangwan, Adv.Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv.Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv.Mr. Abhinav Goyal, Adv.Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Adv.Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal,Adv.Ms. Rekha Dwivedi, Adv.Mrs. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv.

Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv.Mr. Anupam Yadav, Adv.4Mr. Surender Singh, Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.Mr. Siddharth Batra, Adv.Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Adv.Mr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla, Adv.For Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv.Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. For Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.Mr. Karan Vir Singh Khehar, Adv.Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.8199-8213 of 2016, SLP (C)Nos.3086-3135/2016, SLP (C) Nos.10265-10342/2016, SLP(C)...CCNos.8365-8434/2016, SLP (C) Nos.18043-18117/2016, SLP(C)...CCNos.7409-7476/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.12624-12678/2016 andSLP(C)...CC Nos.11922-11974/2016.It has been agreed between the parties that SLP (C)Nos.3086-3135/2016 and SLP (C) Nos.10265-10342/2016 be treated asthe leading cases and the pleadings be completed.List all other matters along with these Special LeavePetitions on 07.02.2017. (ASHAÂ SUNDRIYAL)COURTÂ MASTER (SAROJÂ KUMARIÂ GAUR)COURTÂ MASTER

SECTION IVB Listed on 22.11.2016 Court No. 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 10 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014, 10832 OF 2015, SC30673082, 41524155, 54445448, 3661, 70867090, 1036510370,CC No. 81998213, SC 28334 @ CC No. 11339/2016, SC 28330 @ CC No. 11499/2016, SC No. 28326 @ CC No. 8883/2016, SC18577, SC No. 2828728289 @ CC Nos. 1681517/2016, SC No. 2829128294 @ CC Nos. 1627516278/2016 of 2016, SC2936629367, 2934043, 2947374, 3183132, 3278842, CC1903439 and 1889394 of 2016. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2526 in SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014 (Application for substitution) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2728 in SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP(C) Nos.3390233909/2014 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.12.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ It is informed that this case is covered by the decision of this Court in “Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs. Udal and others etc. Etc.” reported in (2013) 14 SCC 506 decided on 2nd July, 2013. Issue notice both on the application for condonation of delay as well as SLP returnable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents through registered A.D. Post. - 1 -

Service positions of each SLP is as under: SLP Total Resp. Service Thr. Dasti/A.D V/A Neither A.D Remarks 33902 5 15 Complete 33903 1 1 Complete 33904 1 1 Complete 33905 1 1 Complete 33906 1 Incomplete as sole Resp. (dead) 33907 15 16,8,14,15 913 Incomplete R7 (Dead) 33908 1 1 Complete 33909 1 1 Complete It is further submitted that now Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 have been reported to be dead and notice was directed to be issued on I.A. for substitution in respect of above said respondents vide Hon'ble Chamber Judge order dated 04.04.2016. But Counsel for the petitioner has filed spare copy barred by time by eight days and office report for direction has been updated in Chamber Pool. Service of show cause notice is incomplete in respect of sole respondent in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014. SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. I.A. for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos. 3390233909 of - 2 -

2014 (@ CC Nos. 1854218549 of 2014).” It is submitted that there are total 14 respondents and Respondent Nos. 3 to 14 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Court's order dated 13.04.2015. It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 & 2 which is barred by time by 37 days as per Court's order dated 16.02.2016. He has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. It is also submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of service the pleadings to the Counsel for the respondents so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 04.07.2016, when the following Order was passed: “ The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to serve the copy of the pleadings to both the respondents for filing the counter affidavit. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court with appropriate office report.” SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file special leave petitions, filed by the LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications is condoned. Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development - 3 -

Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form .” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, show cause notice was issued on 09.03.2016 to all the respondents. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 (State of Haryana) in all the matters. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance along with Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 in SLP (C) No. 3067, 3069, and Respondnet No. 4 in SLP (C) No. 3071, 3073 and Respondent No. 3 in SLP (C) No. 3075, 3077, 3079 & 3081 of 2016. The same is circulated before the Hon'ble Court. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from respondent nos. 35 so far. SLP (C) Nos. 41524155, 54445448/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.30673082 of 2016. Compensation as determined by the Reference Court be paid to the land owners.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matters above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016. SLP (C) No. 3661/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.02.2016, when the Court was pleased - 4 -

to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. SLP (C) No. 70867090/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.........CC Nos.25852586/2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. SLP (C) Nos. 1036510370/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matters above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 54445448 of 2016. Cause title has been amended - 5 -

accordingly and also included in SLP paper books. SLP (C) No. CC No. 81998213/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 02.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP(C)No. 10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned matters are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. SC 28334 @ CC No. 11339/2016, SC 28330 @ CC No. 11499/2016, SC No. 28326 @ CC No. 8883/2016, SC18577 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file SLPs is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned SLPs are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. - 6 -

It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.07.2016 filed an application for directions. The same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that pursuant to the above order, proforma Respondent No. 4 has been deleted from the array of parties in SLP (C) No. 28326/2016. SLP (C) Nos. 2828728289 (CC Nos. 1681516817/2016) and 282912829416278 (1627578/2016) of 2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.30673082/2016 .” The matters above mentioned alongwith connected matters except SLP (C) Nos. 2828789 and 2829194 of 2016 were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016, when inter alia the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ SLP(C)Nos.3390233909/2014,10832/2015,30673 082/2016, 41524155/2016, 5444 5448/2016, 3661/2016, 70867090/2016, 10365 10370/2016, 18577/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos. 8199 8213/2016, 11339/2016,11499/2016 and 8883/2016 List these matters on 27th September, 2016...” SLP (C) Nos.2947329474 and 2936629367 of 2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.30673082/2016.” SLP (C) No. 2934043 of 2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23.09.2016, when the Court was pleased - 7 -

to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Application(s) for substitution is/are allowed. Application(s) for deletion of proforma respondents is/are allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.30673082/2016. ” SLP (C) No. 3183132 of 2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 03.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)No.18577/2016.” SLP (C) No. 32788842 of 2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The application(s) for substitution is/are allowed. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of SLP(C)....CC Nos.25852586 of 2016.” SLP (C) CC Nos. 1889397 and 1903439 of 2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ To be taken up along with CC No.11331148/2016, which is noted for listing on 22.11.2016. Implementation of the impugned judgments qua remanding the matters to the Reference Court is stayed. The petitioners are directed to serve a copy of the petitions upon the Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana.” - 8 -

SECTION IVB Listed on.22.11.2016 Court No.11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.17 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 30863135, 10265342,17734803, 18043117 OF 2016 CC NOS. 740976, 12624678 AND 11922974 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.9 (Application for impleadment as party respondent in SLP (C) No. 3121 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.10 (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 11 (Application for exemption from filing official translation) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.168 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP in SLP (C) CC No. 740976 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.138 (Application for permission to file SLP in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.3955 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioners in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 5672 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 103172/2016 (Application for direction in SLP (C) No. 17734803/2016) Satish Kumar Gupta & Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter i.e. SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016 @ CC No. 14031452 of 2016 above mentioned was listed before

the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Permission to file special leave petitions, filed by the LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications is condoned. Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc. ], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form. ” It is submitted that notice issued to Respondent Nos. 18. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 13. Neither AD Cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from Respondent Nos. 48 so far. It is further submitted that Mr. Vipin Kumar Jain, Advocate has on 05.09.2016 filed application for impleadment/respondent, application for permission to file additional documents and application for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure A5 and the same have been registered as I.A. Nos. 9, 10 & 11 and being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that cause title has been amended accordingly and included in SLP paper books. Service of show cause notice is incomplete.

SLP (C) Nos. 10265342/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) No. 17734803/2016 and 18043117/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ Permission to file SLPs is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the

risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. ” It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate for the petitioner has filed application for direction which is registered as I.A. Nos. 103172. The same is circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that Cause title has been amended accordingly and included in the SLP paper books. SLP (C) CC No. 740976/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) CC No. 12624678/2016 and 11922974/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ”

SLP (C) CC No. 12624678/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) CC No. 11922974/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21st day November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai , Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

1 ITEM NO.33+63 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C).....CC 21439-21441/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 256/2012,RFA No. 4527/2010 and RFA No. 4528/2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) LAXMI NARAIN AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21543-21545/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21783/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21984-21985/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 18/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Ms. Tanya Swarup, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V, AOR Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file SLP granted.

2 Abatement, if any, is set aside. Delay condoned in filing substitution application(s). Application(s) for substitution is allowed. To be heard after the judgment in Special Leave Petition(C) No.10832 of 2015 and other connected matters is delivered. Proceedings pending before the Trial Court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2 nd July, 2013 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4843-4940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limiterd Vs. Udal & Others etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. Tag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.8589-8603 of 2016. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

F1ITEM NO.33+63 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C).....CC 21439-21441/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 256/2012,RFA No. 4527/2010 and RFA No. 4528/2010 passedby the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)LAXMI NARAIN AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21543-21545/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andappln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for permission to file SLPand Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21783/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21984-21985/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Date : 18/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankit Swarup, AORMs. Tanya Swarup, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv.Ms. Usha Nandini. V, AORMr. Gagan Gupta, AORFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPermission to file SLP granted.2 Abatement, if any, is set aside.Delay condoned in filing substitution application(s). Application(s) for substitution is allowed. To be heard after the judgment in Special LeavePetition(C) No.10832 of 2015 and other connected mattersis delivered. Proceedings pending before the Trial Court shallremain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have beenpaid compensation as per judgment dated 2 nd July, 2013passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4843-4940 of2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development CorporationLimiterd Vs. Udal & Others etc.], the petitioners shallalso be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shallbe subject to final orders that might be passed by thisCourt. Tag with SLP(C)...CC Nos.8589-8603 of 2016. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

CORRECTED ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos.........../2016 (CC No(s).19960-19964/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4587/2011, 4586/2011, 4590/2011, 5230/2011 and 270/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BISHAMBER DAYAL ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln., permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 11/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Permission to file SLP is granted. Issue notice on the applications of condonation of delay in filing substitution application, substitution and special leave petitin. Application for deletion of proforma respondent is allowed. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.14595-14609/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos.........../2016 (CC No(s).19960-19964/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4587/2011, 4586/2011, 4590/2011, 5230/2011 and 270/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BISHAMBER DAYAL ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln., permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 11/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the applications of condonation of delay in filing substitution application, substitution and special leave petitin. Application for deletion of proforma respondent is allowed. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.14595-14609/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ÒCORRECTEDITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos.........../2016 (CC No(s).19960-19964/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4587/2011, 4586/2011, 4590/2011, 5230/2011 and 270/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)BISHAMBER DAYAL ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln., permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)Date : 11/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Permission to file SLP is granted.Issue notice on the applications of condonation ofdelay in filing substitution application, substitutionand special leave petitin.Application for deletion of proforma respondent isallowed.Tag with SLP(C)Nos.14595-14609/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant RegistrarITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos.........../2016 (CC No(s).19960-19964/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4587/2011, 4586/2011, 4590/2011, 5230/2011 and 270/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)BISHAMBER DAYAL ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln., permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)Date : 11/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Issue notice on the applications of condonation ofdelay in filing substitution application, substitutionand special leave petitin.Application for deletion of proforma respondent isallowed.Tag with SLP(C)Nos.14595-14609/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........../2016 (CC No(s).19584-19638/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.5956/2011, 6269/2011, 2438/2011, 4718/2011, 4598/2010, 3508/2010, 1915/2011, 3939/2010, Cross Objection Nos.198-CI/2013 in RFA No.3939/2010, 6265/2011, 3511/2010, 4062/2010, 1195/2011, 2420/2011, 3518/2010, Cross Objection No.217-CI/2010 in RFA No.3518/2010, 3088/2012, 5582/2012, 4059/2010, 3935/2010, 6261/2011, 5657/2015, 2432/2011, 4189/2010, 3134/2010, 4185/2010, 6316/2011, 7185/12, 7868/2011, 3171/2010, 6797/2011, 6260/2011, 2695/2015, 7225/2012, 4468/2011, 6154/2011, 3047/2010, 4366/2010, 2826/2013, 5901/2013, 3383/2010, 6253/2011, 2437/2011, 3138/2010, 6503/2011, 6887/2011, 6888/2011, 4492/2011, 3045/2010, 3044/2010, 4169/2010, 3200/2011, 3774/2011 and Cross Objection No.28-CI in RFA Nos.3774/2011 and 7413/2015 dated 19/20/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SUKHDEV ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 28/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. V.S. Gupta,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petitions is granted. 1

Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The application(s) for substitution is/are allowed. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.5444-5448 of 2016 arising out of SLP(C)....CC Nos.2585-2586 of 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

SECTION IVB Listed on.28.10.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.20 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.178 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.7996 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioner) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.97114 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS.19584638 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) Sukhdev Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate on 31.08.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 5956 of 2011, 6269/2011, 2438 of 2011, 4718 of 2011, 4598 of 2010, 3508 of 2010, 1915 of 2011, Cross Objection No.198CI of 2013 in RFA nos. 3939 of 2010, 6265 of 2011, 3511 of 2010, 4062 of 2010, 1195 of 2011, 3939 of 2010, 2420 of 2011, 3518 of 2010, Cross Objection No.217CI of 2010 in RFA No. 3518 of 2010, 3088 of 2012, 5582 of 2012, 4059 of 2010, 3935 of 2010, 6261 of 2011, 5657 of 2015, 2432 of 2011, 4189 of 2010, 3134 of 2010, 4185 of 2010, 6316 of 2011, 7185 of 2012, 7868 of 2011, 3171 of 2010, 6797 of 2011, 6260 of 2011, 2695 of 2015, 7225 of 2012, 4468 of 2011, 6154 of 2011, 3047

of 2010, 4366 of 2010, 2826 of 2013, 5901 of 2013, 3383 of 2010, 6253 of 2011, 2437 of 2011, 3138 of 2010, 6503 of 2011, 6887 of 2011, 6888 of 2011, 4492 of 2011, 3045 of 2010, 3044 of 2010, 4169 of 2010, 3200 of 2011, 3774 of 2011 and Cross Objection No. 28CI in RFA No. 3774 of 2011 and 7413 of 2015 on dated 19.02.2016 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution of deceased Petitioner No. 1 in RFA No. 4598 of 2010 namely Qabul Singh, Petitioner No. 1 in RFA No. 3508 of 2010 namely Rajbir, Petitioner No. 4 in RFA No. 3508 of 2010 namely Amar Singh, Petitioner No. 6 in RFA No. 1915 of 2011 namely Kalu Singh, Petitioner No. 6 in RFA No. 3508 of 2010 namely Kashmiri, Petitioner No. 9 in RFA No. 7413 of 2015 namely Rajinder Singh, Petitioner No. 2 in RFA No. 6265 of 2011 namely Janak Singh, Petitioner No. 1 in RFA No. 3511 of 2010 namely Balbir Singh, Petitioner No.1 in RFA No. 5582 of 2012 namely Gugan Singh, Petitioner NO. 10 in RFA No. 5582 of 2012 namely Amar Bai, Petitioner No. 18 in RFA No. 5582 of 2012 namely Charan Singh, Petitioner NO. 1 & 10 in RFA No. 4059 of 2010, 3935 of 2010 & 6261 of 2011 respectively namely Bahadar @ Bahadur, Petitioner No. 3 in RFA No. 3935 of 2010 namely Lilawati, Petitioner No. 8 in RFA No. 3935 of 2010 namely Shanti Devi, Petitioner No. 15 in RFA No. 4059 of 2010 & Petitioner No. 17 in RFA No. 3935 of 2010 namely Ranjit Singh, Petitioner No. 9 in RFA No. 3935 of 2010 & 6261 of 2011 and Petitioner No. 7 in RFA No. 4059 of 2010 namely Ram Kumar, Petitioner No. 1 in RFA No. 4059 of 2010 namely Suresh, Petitioner No. 1 in RFA Nos. 3134 of 2010, 4185 of 2010 & 4169 of 2010 namely Ram Kanwar, Petitioner NO. 12 in RFA No. 7185 of 2012 namely Harpiari and

Petitioner no. 1 in RFA No. 3171 of 2010 namely Bharat Singh which are barred by time by 1282, 3191, 3417, 419, 419, 1211, 229, 4411, 733, 342, 363, 719, 5366, 2911, 1030, 190, 713, 996, 964 & 706 days respectively and Counsel has also filed an applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside abatement. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 & 19.02.2016 in RFA Nos. 5956 of 2011, 6269 of 2011, 2438 of 2011, 4718 of 2011, 4598 of 2010, 3508 of 2010, 1915 of 2011, 3939 of 2010 & Cross Objection NO. 198CI of 2013 in RFA No. 3939 of 2010, RFA No. 6265 of 2011, 3511 of 2010, 4062 of 2010, 1195 of 2011, 2420 of 2011, 3518 of 2010 and Cross Objection No.217CI of 2010 in RFA No. 3518 of 2010, RFA Nos. 3088 of 2012, 5582 of 2012, 4059 of 2010, 3935 of 2010, 6261 of 2011, 5657 of 2015, 2432 of 2011, 4189 of 2010, 3134 of 2010, 4185 of 2010, 6316 of 2011, 7185 of 2012, 7868 of 2011, 3171 of 2010, 6797 of 2011, 6260 of 2011, 2695 of 2015, 7225 of 2012, 4468 of 2011, 6154 of 2011, 3047 of 2010, 4366 of 2010, 2826 of 2013, 5901 of 2013, 3383 of 2010, 6253 of 2011, 2437 of 2011, 3138 of 2010, 6503 of 2011, 6887 of 2011, 6888 of 2011, 4492 of 2011, 3045 of 2010, 3044 of 2010, 4169 of 2010, 3200 of 2011, 3774 of 2011 & Cross Objection No. 28CI in RFA No. 3774 of 2011 & RFA No. 7413 of 2015 are barred by time by 238, 238, 238, 238, 240, 192, 232, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 236, 237, 239, 219, 237, 240, 224, 240, 240, 240, 232, 236, 236, 237, 118, 240, 240, 207, 240, 237, 237, 221, 221, 163, 240, 236, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240 & 92 days respectively and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP.

It is further submitted that CC Nos. 1889318897/2016s Entitled Ram Kishan & Ors. Etc. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. arising out of common followed Judgment was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.10.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to list the matter on 22.11.2016. (Copy of order dated 17.10.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016 Entitled Satish Kumar Gupta & Etc. Etc. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. arising out of common followed Judgment was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.09.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to list the matter on 22.11.2016. The said SLP is pending.(Copy of order dated 28.09.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the notification dated 26.06.2002, 07.03.2002, 06.03.2002, 25.11.2002, 26.02.2002, 20.05.2004, 22.07.2003, 24.01.2003, 27.07.2006, 09.03.2006, 28.01.2011, 12.05.2004, Award dated 24.12.2003 and exhibits as per his undertaking letter dated 26.09.2016. In this regard, counsel has given a letter dated 17.10.2016 stating therein that the same are not relevant for adjudication of case and Counsel has requested to list the matter at his own risk. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27th day October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Dr. Kailash Chand , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

\230ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........../2016 (CC No(s).19584-19638/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.5956/2011, 6269/2011, 2438/2011, 4718/2011, 4598/2010,3508/2010, 1915/2011, 3939/2010, Cross Objection Nos.198-CI/2013 inRFA No.3939/2010, 6265/2011, 3511/2010, 4062/2010, 1195/2011, 2420/2011, 3518/2010, Cross Objection No.217-CI/2010 in RFA No.3518/2010, 3088/2012, 5582/2012, 4059/2010, 3935/2010, 6261/2011, 5657/2015, 2432/2011, 4189/2010, 3134/2010, 4185/2010, 6316/2011, 7185/12, 7868/2011, 3171/2010, 6797/2011, 6260/2011, 2695/2015, 7225/2012, 4468/2011, 6154/2011, 3047/2010, 4366/2010, 2826/2013, 5901/2013, 3383/2010, 6253/2011, 2437/2011, 3138/2010, 6503/2011, 6887/2011, 6888/2011, 4492/2011, 3045/2010, 3044/2010, 4169/2010, 3200/2011, 3774/2011 and Cross Objection No.28-CI in RFA Nos.3774/2011 and 7413/2015 dated 19/20/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)SUKHDEV ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)Date : 28/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. V.S. Gupta,Adv.Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPermission to file special leave petitions isgranted. 1Delay in filing the substitution application iscondoned.The application(s) for substitution is/are allowed.Tag with SLP(C)Nos.5444-5448 of 2016 arising out ofSLP(C)....CC Nos.2585-2586 of 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 6/2016, I.A. 7/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.10365-10370/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4154/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6342/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6345/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7338/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7370/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) PARAMJEET PANAG AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (For correction of name of the petitioner and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 24/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Batra, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears on behalf of the respondents to oppose I.A. No.6/2016. In the interest of justice, I. A. No.6/2016 is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. Cause title be amended accordingly. Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on. Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 (Application for correction of the name of petitioner No. 3 in SLP (C) No. 10365 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.7 (Application for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure A) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOS. 1036570 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Paramjeet Panag & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner has on 03.08.2016 filed application for correction of the name of petitioner No. 3 in SLP (C) No.10365 of 2016 and stating therein that name of petitioner is Jasvinder Kaur instead of Jaswant Kaur alongwith Annexure A to C. He also filed application for

exemption from filing offical translation of Annexure A and the same are registered as I.A No. 6 and 7 are being circulated with this office report. The abovementioned applications in the matter are listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) with this office report. Dated this the 14th day September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

\204ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 6/2016, I.A. 7/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) Nos.10365-10370/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4154/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6342/2011 06/10/2015 inRFA No. 6345/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7338/2011 06/10/2015 in RFANo. 7370/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)PARAMJEET PANAG AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(For correction of name of the petitioner and exemption from filingO.T. and office report)Date : 24/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Batra, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears on behalf of the respondents to opposeI.A. No.6/2016.In the interest of justice, I. A. No.6/2016 is allowedat the risk of the petitioner.Cause title be amended accordingly.Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 18893-18897/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1088/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2678/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4013/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4319/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4588/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) RAM KISHAN & ORS. ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 19034-19039/2016 With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and substitution and permission to file SLP and Office Report) Date : 17/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,AOR Ms. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R To be taken up along with CC No.1133-1148/2016, which is noted for listing on 22.11.2016. Implementation of the impugned judgments qua remanding the matters to the Reference Court is stayed. The petitioners are directed to serve a copy of the petitions upon the Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION IV B Listed on.17.10.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 21 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.12 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.34 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioner) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.56 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO.1889397 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for discharge from guardianship) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing official translation of Annexures A to C) Ram Kishan & Ors. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Mr.Gagan Gupta, Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 13.6.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 4319, 1088, 4013 of 2013, 2678 of 2012 and 4588 of 2011 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition, Application for discharge from guardianship and exemption from filing official translation of Annexures A to C .

It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution of deceased appellant namely Chander Kala in RFA NO. 2678 of 2012 and appellant namely Ghamandi Lal which is barred by time by 329 and 1952 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 161 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 71 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 232 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.14595609/2016@ SLP (C)CC No.85898603/2016 Entitled Harish Kumar Etc. Versus State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 9.5.2016 (Copy of order dated 9.5.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.3661/2016 Entitled KOHLI HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., ORIENT CRAFT LIMITED vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.9.2016 and directed to list the matter on 22 nd November, 2016. (Copy of order dated 27.9.2016 is enclosed herewith).(main SLP(C) No. 3390233909/2014). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7th day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

SECTION IV B Listed on 17.10.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.12 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.3 in CC NO. 19037/2016 (Application for substitution to bring on record the LRs. of deceased petitioner no. 1 in RFA NO. 2142/2013) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.4 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 19034 19039 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) Rakesh etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Ms. Usha Nandini V., Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 08.08.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 462, 1359, 1656, 2142, 2143 and 5414 of 2013 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition and exemption from filing Official Translation of Anenxure.

It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs of deceased petitioner no. 1 namely Rati Ram in SLP (C) No. CC No. 19037/2016 @ RFA No. 2142/2013 which is barred by time by 1218 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 217 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 25 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 242 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) CC Nos. 1889318897 of 2016 Entitled Ram Kishan & Ors. Etc Versus state Of Haryana And Ors Etc as both are arising out of common order. The matter is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 5 th day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip

VITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 18893-18897/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 1088/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2678/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4013/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4319/2013 06/10/2015 in RFANo. 4588/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)RAM KISHAN & ORS. ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC No. 19034-19039/2016With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and substitution and permission to file SLP and Office Report) Date : 17/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,AOR Ms. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,AORFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTo be taken up along with CC No.1133-1148/2016, which is notedfor listing on 22.11.2016.Implementation of the impugned judgments qua remanding thematters to the Reference Court is stayed.The petitioners are directed to serve a copy of the petitionsupon the Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........../2016 (CC No(s).18355-18356/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.3361/2011 & 268/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARPAI AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 03/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)No.18577/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION IV B Listed on 03.10.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 21 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.12 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.3 (Application for substitution to bring on record the LRs. of deceased Appellant no. 7) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.4 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 18355 18356 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation Smt. Bharpai & Ors. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Ms. Usha Nandini V., Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 06.08.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 3361 of 2011 and 268 of 2012 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition and exemption from filing Official Translation of Annexures. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs of deceased appellant no. 7 namely Rati

Ram in RFA No. 3361/2011 which is barred by time by 1218 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 in RFA Nos. 3361 of 2011 and 268 of 2012 is barred by time by 215 days and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted SLP (C) No. 18577 of 2016 entitled Rati Ram And Ors. Versus Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. And Ors. arising out of common followed judgment was listed alongwith connected matters on 27.09.2016, when the Hon'ble Court has directed to list the matters on 22.11.2016. SLP is pending (Copy of order dated 22.11.2016 is enclosed herewith). The matter is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 30 th day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip

nITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........../2016 (CC No(s).18355-18356/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.3361/2011 & 268/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab &Haryana At Chandigarh)BHARPAI AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)Date : 03/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)No.18577/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3086-3135/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2407/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2413/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2416/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2419/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2439/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2440/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2442/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2451/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3106/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3127/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3179/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3209/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3359/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3385/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3401/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3743/2015 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4052/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4057/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4118/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4119/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4312/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4315/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4316/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4326/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4334/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4337/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4343/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4368/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4597/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4599/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4600/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4601/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4605/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4607/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4624/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4625/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4712/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4714/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4716/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4736/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4830/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4838/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5943/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 622/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 623/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 625/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6255/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6292/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6317/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6324/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment as party respondent and permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016 (with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/2016 1

(With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP, substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and substitution and Office Report) Date : 28/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAG Mr. Amit Kumar,AAG For Dr. Monika Gusain,AOR Mr. Karanvir Singh Khehar,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 22.11.2016. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2

SECTION IVB Listed on.28.09.2016 Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 30863135, 10265342,17734803, 18043117 OF 2016 CC NOS. 740976, 12624678 AND 11922974 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.9 (Application for impleadment as party respondent in SLP (C) No. 3121 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.10 (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 11 (Application for exemption from filing official translation) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.168 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP in SLP (C) CC No. 740976 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.138 (Application for permission to file SLP in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.3955 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioners in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 5672 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application in SLP (C) No. 1192274 of 2016) Satish Kumar Gupta & Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter i.e. SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016 @ CC No. 14031452 of 2016 above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :

“ Permission to file special leave petitions, filed by the LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications is condoned. Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc. ], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form. ” It is submitted that notice issued to Respondent Nos. 18. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 13. Neither AD Cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from Respondent Nos. 48 so far. It is further submitted that Mr. Vipin Kumar Jain, Advocate has on 05.09.2016 filed application for impleadment/respondent, application for permission to file additional documents and application for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure A5 and the same have been registered as I.A. Nos. 9, 10 & 11 and being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. Service of show cause notice is incomplete. SLP (C) Nos. 10265342/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Permission to file the special leave

petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) No. 17734803/2016 and 18043117/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ Permission to file SLPs is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. ” SLP (C) No. 17734803/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter.

SLP (C) No. 18043117/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) CC No. 740976/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) CC No. 12624678/2016 and 11922974/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016 alongwith connected matters, when the Court was pleased to pass inter alia the following order : “ SLP(C)Nos.30863135/2016,1026510342/2016, 1773417803/2016,1804318117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.74097476/2016, 1262412678/2016 and 1192211974/2016 Detagged. List these matters on 28th September, 2016. ” SLP (C) CC No. 12624678/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. SLP (C) CC No. 11922974/2016 It is submitted that this is fresh adjourned matter. The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with

this office report. Dated this the 27th day September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai , Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

¦ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3086-3135/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2407/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2413/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2416/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2419/2011 06/10/2015 in RFANo. 2439/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2440/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No.2442/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2451/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3106/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3127/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3179/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3209/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3359/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3385/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3401/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3743/2015 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4052/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4057/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4118/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4119/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4312/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4315/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4316/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4326/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4334/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4337/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4343/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4368/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4597/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4599/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4600/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4601/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4605/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4607/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4624/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4625/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4712/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4714/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4716/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4736/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4830/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4838/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5943/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 622/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 623/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 625/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6255/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6292/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6317/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6324/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment as party respondent and permission to file additional documents and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016(with Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/20161(With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP, substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and substitution and Office Report) Date : 28/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Gupta,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAGMr. Amit Kumar,AAGFor Dr. Monika Gusain,AORMr. Karanvir Singh Khehar,Adv.

Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv.Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList on 22.11.2016. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2

ITEM NO.18+23 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.18 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33902-33909/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA Nos.1437/2011 to 1444/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and c/delay in filing substitution and substitution) WITH SLP(C)No.10832/2015-(With Office Report) SLP(C)Nos.3067-3082/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T, .permission to submit additional document(s) and Office Report) SLP(C)No.4152-4155/2016-(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C)No.5444-5448/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) SLP(C)No.3661/2016-(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C)Nos.7086-7090/2016-(With Office Report) SLP(C)Nos.10365-10370/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, correction of name of the petitioner and exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C)Nos............/2016 (CC Nos.8199-8213/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C)No.28334/2016 SLP(C)No.28330 & 28326/2016 (With office report) 1

SLP(C)No.18577/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C)Nos.28287-28289/2016 SLP(C)Nos.28291-28294/2016 (With interim relief and Office Report) Item No.23 : SLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC No(s).17298-17299/2016) (With office report) WITH SLP(C)Nos.............../2016 (CC Nos.17527-17530/2016 SLP(C)Nos.............../2016 (CC Nos.17541-17542/2016) (With office report) Date : 27/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Not taken up. List on 22 nd November, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

SECTION IVB Listed on 27.09.2016 Court No. 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 18 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014, 10832 OF 2015, SC30673082, 41524155, 54445448, 3661, 70867090, 1036510370,CC No. 81998213, SC 28334 @ CC No. 11339/2016, SC 28330 @ CC No. 11499/2016, SC No. 28326 @ CC No. 8883/2016, SC18577, SC No. 2828728289 @ CC Nos. 1681517/2016, SC No. 2829128294 @ CC Nos. 1627516278/2016 of 2016. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2526 in SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014 (Application for substitution) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2728 in SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP(C) Nos.3390233909/2014 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.12.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ It is informed that this case is covered by the decision of this Court in “Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs. Udal and others etc. Etc.” reported in (2013) 14 SCC 506 decided on 2nd July, 2013. Issue notice both on the application for condonation of delay as well as SLP returnable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents through registered A.D. Post. - 1 -

It is submitted that there are total 14 respondents and Respondent Nos. 3 to 14 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Court's order dated 13.04.2015. It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 & 2 which is barred by time by 37 days as per Court's order dated 16.02.2016. He has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. It is also submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of service the pleadings to the Counsel for the respondents so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 04.07.2016, when the following Order was passed: “ The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to serve the copy of the pleadings to both the respondents for filing the counter affidavit. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court with appropriate office report.” SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file special leave petitions, filed by the LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications is condoned. Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the - 3 -

petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form .” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, show cause notice was issued on 09.03.2016 to all the respondents. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 (State of Haryana) in all the matters. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from respondent nos. 25 so far. SLP (C) Nos. 41524155, 54445448/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.30673082 of 2016. Compensation as determined by the Reference Court be paid to the land owners.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matters above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016. SLP (C) No. 3661/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. - 4 -

SLP (C) No. 70867090/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.........CC Nos.25852586/2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. SLP (C) Nos. 1036510370/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matters above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 54445448 of 2016. SLP (C) No. CC No. 81998213/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 02.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP(C)No. 10832/2015. - 5 -

Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned matters are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. SC 28334 @ CC No. 11339/2016, SC 28330 @ CC No. 11499/2016, SC No. 28326 @ CC No. 8883/2016, SC18577 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file SLPs is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned SLPs are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.07.2016 filed an application for directions. The same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that pursuant to the above order, proforma Respondent No. 4 has been deleted from - 6 -

the array of parties in SLP (C) No. 28326/2016. SLP (C) Nos. 2828728289 (CC Nos. 1681516817/2016) and 282912829416278 (1627578/2016) of 2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.30673082/2016 .” The matters above mentioned alongwith connected matters except SLP (C) Nos. 2828789 and 2829194 of 2016 were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.08.2016, when inter alia the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ SLP(C)Nos.3390233909/2014,10832/2015,30673 082/2016, 41524155/2016, 5444 5448/2016, 3661/2016, 70867090/2016, 10365 10370/2016, 18577/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos. 8199 8213/2016, 11339/2016,11499/2016 and 8883/2016 List these matters on 27th September, 2016...” The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 26 th day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip - 7 -

lITEM NO.18+23 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSItem No.18 :Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33902-33909/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA Nos.1437/2011 to 1444/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and c/delay in filing substitution and substitution)WITHSLP(C)No.10832/2015-(With Office Report)SLP(C)Nos.3067-3082/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T, .permission to submit additional document(s) and Office Report)SLP(C)No.4152-4155/2016-(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C)No.5444-5448/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report)SLP(C)No.3661/2016-(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C)Nos.7086-7090/2016-(With Office Report)SLP(C)Nos.10365-10370/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, correction of name of the petitioner and exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)SLP(C)Nos............/2016 (CC Nos.8199-8213/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)SLP(C)No.28334/2016 SLP(C)No.28330 & 28326/2016(With office report)1SLP(C)No.18577/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C)Nos.28287-28289/2016 SLP(C)Nos.28291-28294/2016 (With interim relief and Office Report)Item No.23 :SLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC No(s).17298-17299/2016)(With office report)WITHSLP(C)Nos.............../2016 (CC Nos.17527-17530/2016 SLP(C)Nos.............../2016 (CC Nos.17541-17542/2016)(With office report) Date : 27/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv.Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv.Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNot taken up.List on 22 nd November, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........./2017 (CC No(s).17527-17530/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.958/2013, 4012/2013, 2138/2013 and 1359/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BALBIR ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution, substitution, c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP, for deletion of proforma respondents, for discharge from guardianship and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 23/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Application(s) for substitution is/are allowed. Application(s) for deletion of proforma respondents is/are allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.3067-3082/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........../2016 (CC No(s).17298-17299/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.2087/2013 and 2090/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) OM PARKASH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C)......../2016 (CC Nos.17541-17542/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) Date : 23/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.3067-3082/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB Listed on.23.09.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.22 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.14 and 58 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 1752730 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioner) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for deletion of proforma respondents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for discharge from guardianship) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure A) Balbir Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate on 30.05.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 958, 4012, 2138 and 1359 of 2013 along with the applications for deletion of proforma respondents and exemption from filing official translation Annexure A.

It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution of deceased Appellant No. 1 in RFA No. 4012 of 2013 namely Chander Kala which is barred by time by 315 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that petitioner Nos. 4 to 6 in SLP arising out of RFA No. 2138 of 2013 have become major and discharge petitioner no. 2 as their guardian. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 147 days in filing the SLP. (ii) a delay of 63 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 210 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) Nos.306782 of 2016 @ CC Nos.11331148 of 2016 Entitled Bodan And Ors. Etc. Etc. Versus State Of Haryana Through H SIDC Ltd. And Ors. Etc. arising out of common Order relied upon was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to issue of notice. The said SLP is pending after notice.(Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is enclosed herewith)(Main matter is SLP (C) Nos.33902909 of 2014). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21st day September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Gagan Gupta , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

SECTION IVB Listed on 23.9.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.18 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.12 AND 34 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO.1754142 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for deletion of proforma respondents from array of parties of the SLP)condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLP) Balbir Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate on 27.5.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No.465/2013 and 1656/2013 . It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 144 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 66 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 210 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C)CC No.1729899/2016 Entitled OM PARKASH AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS as both are arising out of common order. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 20th day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. Gagan Gupta , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

SECTION IVB Listed on.23.09.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.18 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.1 and 2 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 1729899 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Om Parkash & Ors. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate on 15.06.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 05.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 2087 and 2090 of 2013. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 163 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 54 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 217 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) CC Nos.1627516278 of 2016 Entitled Satyaparkash @ Satparkash & Anr. Etc. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. arising out of common Order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.09.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to tag the matter with SLP (C) Nos.30673082 of 2016. The said matters are pending. (Copy of order dated 09.09.2016 is enclosed herewith). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21st day September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Gagan Gupta , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

ÜITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........./2017 (CC No(s).17527-17530/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.958/2013, 4012/2013, 2138/2013 and 1359/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)BALBIR ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution, substitution, c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP, for deletion of proforma respondents, for discharge fromguardianship and exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date : 23/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Application(s) for substitution is/are allowed.Application(s) for deletion of proforma respondentsis/are allowed at the risk of the petitioners.Tag with SLP(C)No.3067-3082/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

|ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........../2016 (CC No(s).17298-17299/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.2087/2013 and 2090/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)OM PARKASH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)WITHSLP(C)......../2016 (CC Nos.17541-17542/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) Date : 23/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.3067-3082/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.10+19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.10 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2016 (CC No(s).16275-16278/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.4426/2013, 4338/2013, 2077/2013 and 2089/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SATYAPARKASH @ SATPARKASH AND ANR. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Item No.19 : SLP(C)Nos.16815-16817/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLO and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) Date : 09/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.3067-3082/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB Listed on 9.9.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.10 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.14 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO.1627516278 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Satyaprakash @ Satparkash & Anr. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate on 20.8.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 4426, 4338, 2077 and 2089 of2013 barred by time by 229 days along with the application for condonation of delay in filing SLP . It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.1459514609/2016 @ CC 85898603/2016 Entitled HARISH KUMAR ETC Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 9.5.2016 and was directed to be heard after the judgment in SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 and other connected matters. (Copy of order dated 9.5.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016 @ CC No. 11331148/2016 Entitled Bodan & Ors. Etc. Etc. Versus State of Haryana through HSIDC IMT & Ors. Etc. arising out of common ordeer was directed on 27.1.2016 by the Hon'ble Court. SLP is pending after

notice (Copy of order dated 27.1.2016 is enclosed herewith). Main matter SLP 33902909/2014. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 8th day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. Gagan Gupta , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

dITEM NO.10+19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSItem No.10 :Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2016 (CC No(s).16275-16278/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.4426/2013, 4338/2013, 2077/2013 and 2089/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)SATYAPARKASH @ SATPARKASH AND ANR. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Item No.19 :SLP(C)Nos.16815-16817/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLO and c/delay inrefiling SLP and office report)Date : 09/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Tag with SLP(C)Nos.3067-3082/2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.33902-33909/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA Nos. 1437-1444 of 2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. For c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP, substitution, c/delay in filing substitution appln.) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3086-3135/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3067-3082/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to submit additional document(s) and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5444-5448/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3661/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7086-7090/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10365-10370/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8199-8213/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11339/2016 S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11499/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8883/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18577/2016 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report) 1

Date : 09/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Mr. Eashwar,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv. Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. V.Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. R.S.Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rohit K.Aggarwal,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadha,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Mr. Eashwar,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv. Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. V.Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. 2

Mr. Amit Kumar,AAG Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAG Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)Nos.33902-33909/2014,10832/2015,3067-3082/2016 4152-4155/2016,5444-5448/2016,3661/2016,7086-7090/2016, 10365-10370/2016,18577/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.8199-8213/2016,11339/2016,11499/2016 and 8883/2016 List these matters on 27 th September, 2016. SLP(C)Nos.3086-3135/2016,10265-10342/2016, 17734-17803/2016,18043-18117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.7409-7476/2016, 12624-12678/2016 and 11922-11974/2016 De-tagged. List these matters on 28 th September, 2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar 3

SECTION IVB Listed on 09.08.2016 Court No. 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 15 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014, 10832 OF 2015, 30863135, SC30673082, 41524155, 54445448, 3661, 70867090, 1036510370, 1026510342, CC No. 81998213, CC 74097476, CC 11339, CC 11499, SC1773417803, CC No. 8883,SC1804318117, CC No. 1262412678, SC18577 and CC No. 1192211974 of 2016. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2526 in SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014 (Application for substitution) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2728 in SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. in SLP (C) No. 17734803 and 1804318117/2016 (Application for directions) Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP(C) Nos.3390233909/2014 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.12.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ It is informed that this case is covered by the decision of this Court in “Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs. Udal and others etc. Etc.” reported in (2013) 14 SCC 506 decided on 2nd July, 2013. Issue notice both on the application for condonation of delay as well as SLP returnable within four weeks. - 1 -

Dasti, in addition, is permitted. ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents through registered A.D. Post. Service positions of each SLP is as under: SLP Total Resp. Service Thr. Dasti/A.D V/A Neither A.D Remarks 33902 5 15 Complete 33903 1 1 Complete 33904 1 1 Complete 33905 1 1 Complete 33906 1 Incomplete as sole Resp. (dead) 33907 15 16,8,14,15 913 Incomplete R7 (Dead) 33908 1 1 Complete 33909 1 1 Complete It is further submitted that now Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 have been reported to be dead and notice was directed to be issued on I.A. for substitution in respect of above said respondents vide Hon'ble Chamber Judge order dated 04.04.2016. But Counsel for the petitioner has filed spare copy barred by time by eight days and office report for direction has been updated in Chamber Pool. Service of show cause notice is incomplete in respect of sole respondent in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014. SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. - 2 -

I.A. for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos. 3390233909 of 2014 (@ CC Nos. 1854218549 of 2014).” It is submitted that there are total 14 respondents and Respondent Nos. 3 to 14 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Court's order dated 13.04.2015. It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 & 2 which is barred by time by 37 days as pert Court's order dated 16.02.2016. He has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. It is also submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of service the pleadings to the Counsel for the respondents so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 04.07.2016, when the following Order was passed: “ The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to serve the copy of the pleadings to both the respondents for filing the counter affidavit. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court with appropriate office report.” SLP (C) No. 30863135 and 30673082/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file special leave petitions, filed by the LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications is condoned. Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial - 3 -

court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form .” SLP (C) No. SLP (C) No. 30863135 It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, show cause notice was issued on 16.03.2016 to all the respondents. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from all the respondents so far. SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016 It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, show cause notice was issued on 09.03.2016 to all the respondents. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in all the matters. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from respondent nos. 25 so far. SLP (C) Nos. 41524155, 54445448/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.30673082 of 2016. Compensation as determined by the Reference Court be paid to the land owners.” - 4 -

It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matter above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) No. 30673082/2016. SLP (C) No. 3661/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. SLP (C) No. 70867090/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.........CC Nos.25852586/2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned is tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 30863135 of 2016. SLP (C) Nos. 1036510370 and 1026510342/2016 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. - 5 -

Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.54445448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the matters above mentioned are tagged with SLP (C) Nos. 54445448 of 2016. SLP (C) No. CC No. 81998213, 74097476/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 02.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Tag with SLP(C)No. 10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.48434940 of 2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned matters are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. SLP (C) Nos. CC nos. 11339, 11499, SC1773417803, CC No. 8883, Sc1804318117 and 18577 of 2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: - 6 -

“ Permission to file SLPs is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015.” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned SLPs are tagged with SLP (C) No. 10832/2015. It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.07.2016 filed an application for directions. The same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. SLP (C) CC No. 1262412678 and CC 1192211974 of 2016. The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.08.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ To be notified on 9th August, 2016, along with SLP(C)Nos.........../2016 (@ CC Nos.46144691/2016).” It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the above mentioned matters are tagged with SLP (C) No. 1026510342/2016. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 8 th day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip - 7 -

@ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.33902-33909/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011in RFA Nos. 1437-1444 of 2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln. For c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refilingSLP, substitution, c/delay in filing substitution appln.)WITHSLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 3086-3135/2016 (With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 3067-3082/2016(With appln.(s) for permission to submit additional document(s) andappln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 5444-5448/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned orderand Office Report)SLP(C) No. 3661/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 7086-7090/2016 (With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 10365-10370/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 10265-10342/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8199-8213/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7409-7476/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11339/2016S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11499/2016 (With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 17734-17803/2016 (With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 8883/2016 (With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 18043-18117/2016 (With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12624-12678/2016(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 18577/2016 (With Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11922-11974/2016(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Office Report)1Date : 09/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s)Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv.Mr. Surender Singh,Adv.Mr. Eashwar,Adv.For Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv.Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. V.Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. R.S.Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Rohit K.Aggarwal,Adv.Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadha,Adv.

Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv.Mr. S. K. Sinha,Adv.For Respondent(s)Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv.Mr. Surender Singh,Adv.Mr. Eashwar,Adv.For Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv.Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. V.Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.2Mr. Amit Kumar,AAGMr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.Mr. Alok Sangwan,AAGDr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C)Nos.33902-33909/2014,10832/2015,3067-3082/20164152-4155/2016,5444-5448/2016,3661/2016,7086-7090/2016,10365-10370/2016,18577/2016, SLP(C)...CCNos.8199-8213/2016,11339/2016,11499/2016 and 8883/2016List these matters on 27 th September, 2016.SLP(C)Nos.3086-3135/2016,10265-10342/2016,17734-17803/2016,18043-18117/2016, SLP(C)...CC Nos.7409-7476/2016, 12624-12678/2016 and11922-11974/2016De-tagged.List these matters on 28 th September, 2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar3

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........./2016 (CC No(s).11922-11974/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.3836/2013, 3415/2013, 2509/2013, 3433/2013, 2510/2013, 3390/2013, 2513/2013, 3439/2013, 2514/2013, 3404/2013, 55/2014, 4077/2014, 5425/2015, 4031/2014, 4224/2013, 3436/2013, 3651/2014, 3831/2013, 3402/2013, 3832/2013, 4398/2013, 3428/2013, 3829/2013, 3432/2013, 3382/2013, 3835/2013, 2542/2013, 2898/2014, 3430/2013, 2540/2013, 3408/2013, 2539/2013, 3834/2013, 3384/2013, 3424/2013, 4018/2013, 2515/2013, 3391/2013, 3837/2013, 3405/2013, 2508/2013, 3438/2013, 5200/2014, 7295/2013, 3839/2013, 3422/2013, 3443/2013, 3828/2013, 3410/2013, 3838/2013, 3419/2013, 4105/2013 & 4106/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) HARDWARI AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) WITH SLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.12624-12678/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln., for substitution and for permission to file SLP and Office Report) Date : 01/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) 1

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R To be notified on 9 th August, 2016, along with SLP(C)Nos.........../2016 (@ CC Nos.4614-4691/2016). (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

SECTION IV B Listed on.1.8.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 11 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.145 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.46103 (Application for bringing Lrs. of deceased petitioners on record) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.104161 (Application for condonation of delay in bringing Lrs. of deceased petitioners on record ) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO.1262478 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) Jeet Ram & Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Dr.Kailash Chand , Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 2.5.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos.1272/2014, 4551/2013, 3474/2013, 3899/2013, 4010/2014, 5322/2014, 2453/2011 and cross objection No. 80CI/2011 in RFA no. 2453/2011, 2304/2014, 4026/2014, 2422/2014, 4053/2014, 3731/2014, 4006/20142254/2014, 4040/2014, 2069/2014, 2277/2014, 4011/2014, and cross objection no. 62CI/2014 in RFA No. 4011/2014, 4024/2014 and cross objection no. 60CI/2014 in RFA no. 4024/2014, 4018/2014 and cross objection no. 55CI/2014 in RFA no. 4018/2014, 4050/2014 and cross objection no. 59CI/2014 in RFA No. 4050/2014,

4021/2014 and cross objection no. 64CI/2014 in RFA No. 4021/2014, 4048/2014 and cross objection no. 66CI/2014 in RFA No. 4048/2014, 4016/2014and cross objection no. 65CI of 2014 in RFA NO. 4016/2014, 4033/2014 and cross objection no. 54CI/2014 in RFA no. 4033/2014, 4036/2014 and cross objection no. 56CI/2014 in RFA No. 4036/2014, 4035/2014 and cross objection no. 58CI/2014 in RFA No. 4035/2014, 4032/2014 and cross objection No. 57CI/2014 in RFA no. 4032/2014, 3901/2013, 3900/2013, 2154/2014, 4015/2014, 2155/2014, 4025/2014, 4013/2014, 253/2014, 2425/2014, 4017/2014, 2424/2014, 4005/2014, 2314/2014, 4014/2014 and order dated 20.10.2015 in RFA no. 6279/2015 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution of deceased petitioner namely inderjit in RFA no. 4010/2014 and 5322/2014, Madhu Bala in RFA No. 2453/2011 and cross objection no. 80CI/2011 in RFA No. 2453/2011, Shadi in RFA No. 3731/2014 and RFA No. 4006/2014, Rajinder in RFA No. 2254/2014 and RFA no. 4040/2014, Gugan Singh in RFA NO. 4011/2014 and cross objection no. 62CI/2014 in RFA No. 4011/2014, 4024/2014 and cross objection no. 60CI/2014 in RFA No. 4050/2014, RFA No. 4035/2014 and cross objection no. 58CI in RFA No. 4035/2014, Bhagwati in RFA No. 4024/2014 and cross objection no. 60CI/2014 in RFA no. 4024/2014, 4050/2014 and cross objection no. 59CI/2014 in RFA No. 4050/2014, 4021/2014 and cross objection no. 64CI/2014 in RFA No. 4021/2014, 4048/2014 and cross objection no. 66CI/2014 in RFA No. 4048/2014, 4036/2014 and cross objection no. 56CI/2014 in RFA no. 4036/2014 and 4035/2014 and cross objection no. 58CI/2014 in RFA No. 4035/2014, Charan Singh in RFA No.

4024/2014 and cross objection no. 60CI in RFA no. 4024/2014, 4018/2014 and cross objection no. 55CI in RFA No. 4018/2014, RFA no. 4050/2014 and cross objection no. 59CI in RFA no. 4050/2014, Amar Bai in RFA No. 4021/2014 and cross objection no. 60CI in RFA No. 4024/2014 and 59CI in RFA no. 4050/2014, 4048/2014, RFA No. 4036/2014 and cross objection no. 66CI/2014 in RFA No. 4048/2014, 4036/2014 and cross objection no. 56CI/2014 in RFA no. 4036/2014 and 4035/2014 and cross objection no. 58CI/2014 in RFA No. 4035/2014, Ompal Singh in RFA no. 4048/2014 and cross objection no. 66CI in RFA no. 4048/2014, RFA No. 4035/2014 and 58CI in RFA No. 4035/2014, Madan Singh in RFA No. 4048/2014 and cross objection no. 66CI, Omwati in RFA No. 4016/2014 and cross objection no. 65CI/2014 in RFA no. 4016/2014 and RFA No. 4035/2014 and cross objection no. 58CI in RFA No. 4035/2014, Sukhpal in RFA No. 2314/2014 and RFA No. 4014/2014, Mukesh in RFA No. 2314/2014 and 4014/2014 which is barred by time by 361, 923, 213, 521, 594, 1261, 304, 292, 2628, 2371, 1182, 2214 and 1991 days respectively and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 is barred by time by 116 days in RFA No. 1272/2014, 97 days in RFA No. 4551/2013, 112 days in RFA No. 3474/2013, 112 days in RFA No. 3899/2013, 113 days in RFA No. 4010/2014, 113 days in RFA NO. 5322/2014, 115 days in 2453/2011 and cross objection no. 80CI/2011 in RFA No. 2453/2011, 113 days in RFA No. 2304/2014, 113 days in RFA No. 4026/2014, 117 days in RFA No. 2422/2014, 117 days in RFA no. 4053/2014, 115 in RFA no. 3731/2014,

115 in RFA no. 4006/2014 , 113 days in RFA no. 2254/2014, 113 days in RFA no. 4040/2014, 111 days in RFA no. 2069/2014, 111 days in RFA NO. 2277/2014, 112 days in RFA no. 4011/2014 and cross objection no. 62CI/2014 in RFA No. 4011/2014, 112 days in RFA No. 4024/2014 and cross objection no. 60CI/2014 in RFA No. 4024/2014 , 112 days in RFA NO. 55CI/2014 in RFA No. 4018/2014, 112 days in RFA No. 4050/2014 and cross objection no. 59CI/2014 in RFA No. 4050/2014, 112 days in RFA No.4021/2014 and cross objection no. 64CI/2014 in RFA NO. 4021/2014 , 112 days in RFA No. 4048/2014 and cross objection no. 66CI/2014 in RFA NO. 4048/2014 , 112 days in RFA NO. 4016/2014 in cross objection no. 65CI/2014 in RFA NO. 4016/2014, 112 days in RFA No. 4033/2014 and cross objection no.54CI/2014 in RFA No. 4033/2014, 112 days in RFA No. 4036/2014 and cross objection no. 56CI/2014 in RFA No. 4036/2014, 114 days in RFA No. 4035/2014 and cross objection no. 58CI/2014 in 4035/2014, 112 days in RFA No. 4032/2014 and cross objection no.57CI/2014 in RFA No. 4032/2014, 119 days in RFA NO. 3901/2013, 119 days in RFA No. 3900/2013, 116 days in RFA NO. 2154/2014, 116 days in 4015/2014, 116 days in RFA NO. 2155/2014, 116 days in RFA No. 4025/2014, 116 days in RFA No. 4013/2014, 116 days in RFA No. 2253/2014, 116 days in RFA NO. 2425/2014, 116 days in 4017/2014, 116 days in RFA NO. 2424/2014, 116 days in 4005/2014, 116 days in RFA No. 2314/2014, 111 days in RFA No. 4014/2014 and 100 days in RFA No. 6279/2015 respectively and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C)CC No.1192211974/2016 Entitled HARDWARI AND ORS. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. as

both are arising out of common order. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the copies of award/order dated 24.1.2007, 20.5.2004, 12.7.2003, 14.12.2003, 27.7.2006, 9.3.2006, 28.12.2007 and notification dated 6.3.2002, 7.3.2002, 29.9.2005 and exhibition order . In this regard, counsel has given a letter dated 12.7.2016 stating therein that the same are not available with him and. Same are not relevant to the adjudication of the matter and counsel has requested to register and list the matter at his own risk. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 30th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Dr.Kailash Chand, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

SECTION IV B Listed on 01.08.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 11 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.138 (Applications for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.3955 (Application for substitution of the LRs. of deceased petitioners) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.5672 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 11922 11974 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) Hardwari & Ors. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 07.06.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 3836, 3415, 2509, 3433, 2510 3390, 2513, 3439, 2514, 3404/2013, 55, 4077/2014, 5425/2015, 4031/2014, 4224, 3436/2013, 3651/2014, 3831, 3402, 3832, 4398, 3428, 3829, 3432, 3382, 3835, 2542/2013, 2898/2014, 3430, 2540, 3408, 2539, 3834, 3384, 3424, 4018, 2515, 3391, 3837, 3405, 2508, 3438/2013, 5200/2014, 7295, 3839, 3422, 3443, 3828, 3410, 3838, 3419, 4105 and 4106/2013 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner

has also filed an applications for substitution of deceased petitioner no. 3 in RFA No. 3415/2013, 5 in RFA No. 3404/2013, 3 in RFA NO. 5425/2015, 4031/2014, 4 & 8 in RFA NO. 4031/2014, 2 in RFA NO. 3651/2014, 3831/2013, 2 in RFA Nos. 4398 & 3428/2013, Petitioner no. 1 in RFA No. (3430 & 2540/2013), (3424/2013), (2515 & 3391/2013), (3405/2013), (3410/2013), (3838/2013) and (3419/2013) which is barred by time by 1818, 3101, 251, 2915, 1537, 129, 109, 433, 1738, 38, 703,3446, 117 & 3187 days respectively and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 is barred by time by 155 days in RFA Nos. 3836, 3415, 3433, 3390, 3439, 3404/2013, 55, 4077, 4031/2014, 4224, 3436, 3428, 3834, 3384, 3424, 3391,3438/2013, 5200/2014, 3839, 3422, 3443, 3828, 3419/2013, 147 days in RFA Nos. 2509, 2510, 2513, 2514, , 2515, 2508/2013, 139 days in Rfa Nos. 5425/2015, 2542, 2540, 2539/2013, 150 days in RFA Nos. 3651, 2898, 3430, 3837, 3408, 3405/2013, 148 days in RFA Nos. 3831, 3402, 3832, 4018, 3410, 3838/2013, 130 days in RFA No. 4398/2013, 149 days in RFA Nos. 3829, 3432, 3382, 3835/2013, 134 in RFA No. 7295/2013, 153 days in RFA Nos. 4105 & 4106/2013 and Counsel for the petitioner has filed applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No. 3661/2016 entitled Kohli Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Orient Craft Limited Vs State Of Haryana And Ors. arising out of common order was directed to be tagged with SLP (C) No. 30863135/2016 by the Hon'ble Court on 26.02.2016 (Copy of order dated 26.02.2016 is enclosed herewith). (Main matter SLP (C) Nos. 3390233909/2014).

It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished copies of notification/ orders dated 17.09.2004, 27.10.2004, 27.04.2007, award dated 2.05.2004, 22.07.2003, 24.12.2013, 27.07.2005, 09.03.2006, 24.01.2007, 28.12.2007, 02.09.2013, 24.01.2007, 28.09.2013, 31.08.2013 and exhibits and award Nos. 892/2012, 341/2014, 1202 and 243/2009 mentioned in the impugned order as per his undertaking letter dated 22.06.2016. In this regard, Counsel has given a letter dated 12.07.2016 stating therein that the same are not available and not relevant for adjudication at present and has requested to list the matter at his risk. The matter is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 29 th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip

\214ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........./2016 (CC No(s).11922-11974/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.3836/2013, 3415/2013, 2509/2013, 3433/2013, 2510/2013,3390/2013, 2513/2013, 3439/2013, 2514/2013, 3404/2013, 55/2014,4077/2014, 5425/2015, 4031/2014, 4224/2013, 3436/2013, 3651/2014, 3831/2013, 3402/2013, 3832/2013, 4398/2013, 3428/2013, 3829/2013,3432/2013, 3382/2013, 3835/2013, 2542/2013, 2898/2014, 3430/2013,2540/2013, 3408/2013, 2539/2013, 3834/2013, 3384/2013, 3424/2013,4018/2013, 2515/2013, 3391/2013, 3837/2013, 3405/2013, 2508/2013,3438/2013, 5200/2014, 7295/2013, 3839/2013, 3422/2013, 3443/2013,3828/2013, 3410/2013, 3838/2013, 3419/2013, 4105/2013 & 4106/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)HARDWARI AND ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)WITHSLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.12624-12678/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln., for substitution and for permission to file SLP and Office Report) Date : 01/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) 1UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTo be notified on 9 th August, 2016, along withSLP(C)Nos.........../2016 (@ CC Nos.4614-4691/2016). (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar2

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....../2016 (CC No.12274/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 442/2015 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) DINESH KUMAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.14595-14609/2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......./2016 (CC Nos.12302-12304/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.7150/2012, 7151/2012 and 7149/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) KRISHNA & ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manoj Joshi,Adv. Mr. Vardhman Kaushik,Adv. For Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.14595-14609/2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB Listed on 11.7.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.12 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.12 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) CC NO. 12274 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Dinesh Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate on 11.4.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of High court of Punbjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA NO. 442/2015 . It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 98 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 53 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 151 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.1459514609/2016 @ CC 85898603/2016 Entitled HARISH KUMAR ETC vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC arising out of common order was directed on 9.5.2016 by the Hon'ble court to be heard after judgment in SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 in connected matter. SLP is pending (Copy of order dated 9.5.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.3661/2016 Entitled KOHLI HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., ORIENT CRAFT LIMITED vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. arising out of

common followed judgment was directed on 26.2.2016 by the Hon'ble court “ Tag with SLP (C) No. 30863135 of 2016.” (Copy of order dated 26.2.2016 is enclosed herewith). The main matter is SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014. It is further submitted that in SLP (C)CC No.9211/2016 Entitled RATI RAM AND ORS. vs HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND OR S arising out of common followed judgment was directed on 29.6.2016 by the Hon'ble court “ Tag with SLP (C) No. 10832 of 2015.” (Copy of order dated 29.6.2016 is enclosed herewith). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 8th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. Gagan Gupta , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

SECTION IVB Listed on.11.07.2016 Court No. 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 13 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 – 3 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) CC NO. 1230204 OF 2016 Smt. Krishna & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Lalitha Kaushik, Advocate on 27.06.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 7150 of 2012, 7151 of 2012, 7149 of 2012 barred by time by 84 days along with the application for condonation of delay in filing SLP. It is further submitted that notice in SLP © 30863151 of 2016 @ CC No. 14031452 of 2016 Entitled Satish Kumar Gupta And Etc. Etc. Versus State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. arising out of common order was directed on 27.01.2016 by Hon'ble Court. SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is annexed as Annexure P13 at page nos. 172173 in the paper books). (Main Matter S.L.P. (C) Nos. 3390209 of 2014). It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) No. 1459514609 of 2016 @ CC No. 85598603 of 2016 Entitled Harish Kumar Etc Versus State Of Haryana And Ors Etc arising out of common order was directed on 09.05.2016 by Hon'ble Court to be heard after the Judgment in S.L.P. (C) No. 10832 of 2015. SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 09.05.2016 is enclosed

herewith). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 08th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. Lalitha Kaushik, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 4/Bajaj

t ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......./2016 (CC Nos.12302-12304/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.7150/2012, 7151/2012 and 7149/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) KRISHNA & ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manoj Joshi,Adv. Mr. Vardhman Kaushik,Adv. For Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.14595-14609/2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byANITA MALHOTRADate: 2016.07.1115:28:16 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10832/2015 SHYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to serve the copy of the pleadings to both the respondents for filing the counter affidavit. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court with appropriate office report. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

SECTION IV B Supple. Listed on 29.06.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.199 (Applications for permission to file SLPs) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.100152 (Applications for substitution of the LRs. of deceased parties) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.153205 (Applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 10573 10647 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the SLP) Jai Lal Etc. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 19.02.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 4355/2010 and Cross Objection NO. 182CI of 2010 in RFA No. 4355/2010. 4350/2010 and Cross Objection NO. 186CI of 2010 in RFA No. 4350/2010, 3191, 4491,3105/2011, 3504/2010 and Cross Objection NO. 15CI of 2011 in RFA No. 3504/2010, 5953, 6256, 6272, 6737/2011, 4220/2010, 3187, 4061, 3512/2010, 3160/2010 and Cross Objection NO.

14CI of 2010 in RFA Nos. 3160, 1597/2012, 2427/2011, 4190/2010, 3525/2010, 5957/2011, 6328/2011, 3841, 3153, 3400, 4317/2010, 552/2012, 2421/2011, 1088/2012, 6353/2011, 4860/2010, 3384, 4585, 3974/2010, 2488/2013, 3192/2011, 4361/2010, 1199/2011, 553/2012, 6320, 4343, 3198/2011, 3945, 4313, 4353, 4739/2010, 5345,3077, 4832, 2415/2011, 163/2014, 6307/2011, 4214, 3157/2010, 6154/2011, 4356, 3791, 4984, 3048, 4362, 3046, 4336/2010, 5390, 3069/2011, 3159, 2378, 3943, 4871, 3969, 4876, 3793 and 4873/2010 alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution to bring on record the LRs of deceased petitioner no. 1 in RFA NO. 4355/2011, Cross objection NO. 182CI of 2010, 4350/2010 and Cross Objection No. 186CI of 2010 in RFA No. 4350/2010, 2 & 6 in RFA NO. 3191/2011, (petitioner no. 4 in RFA No. 3105/2011 and as R4 in RFA No. 3077/2011), (Respondent No. 3 in RFA No. 3504/2010 and Cross objection No. 15CI of 2011 in RFA No. 3504/2010), (petitioner no. 1 in RFA No. 5953/2011, Respondent No. 1 in RFA No. 6256/2011), (petitioner no. 6 in RFA No. 6272 and 6737/2011), (1 in RFA No. 3186/2010), (8 in RFA No. 4220/2010, 4 in RFA No. 3186/2010), (1 in RFA NO. 3512/2010), (3 in 3160/2010 and CO No. 14CI of 2011), (2 in RFA No. 2472/2011, 1 in Rfa No. 4190/2010, Respondent No. 1 in RFA No. 3525/2010), (Petitioner no. 3 in RFA Nos. 5957/2011 and Respondent No. 3 in RFA No. 6328/2011), (petitioner no. 1 in RFA No. 3841/2010, Respondent No. 1 in RFA No. 3153/2010), (R1 in RFA NO. 3400/2010 and petitioner in RFA No. 4317/2010, 552/2012, Respondent No. 1 in RFA No. 2421/2011 and petitioner no. 1 in RFA No. 1088/2012 and as R1 in RFA No. 6353/2011),

(R1 in RFA No. 4317/2010), (R5 in RFA No. 3974/2010), (Petitioner no. 2 in RFA No. 2488/2013, R2 in RFA No. 3191/2011, R1 in RFA No. 4361/2010, Petitioner no. 1 in RFA No. 1199/2011), (R1 in RFA No. 6320 & 3198/2011, R4 in RFA No. 3945/2010), (R2 in RFA No. 6320, 3198/2011 and RFA No. 3945/2010), (Petitioner no. 1 in RFA No. 4343/2011), (R2 in RFA No. 4353/2010, Petitioner no. 2 in RFA No. 4739 of 2010), (R1 in RFA No. 2415/2011, R4 in RFA No. 163/2014, R2 in RFA NO. 6307/2011, Petitioner in RFA No. 4214/2010 and R1 in RFA No. 3157/2010) which are barred by time by 1903, 2715, 3077, 2311, 1862, 415, 413, 2411, 2171, 2163, 418, 2311, 3814, 3872, 360, 316, 272, 612, 2991, 1754, 1980 and 2116 days respectively and Counsel has also filed applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 41 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 58 days in refiling the SLP. There is a total delay of 99 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) CC No. 9211 of 2016 Entitled R ati Ram And Ors. Versus Haryana State Indus. & Infrastr. Dev. Corp. Ltd. And Ors as both are arising out of common relied upon order. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished copies of order dated 07.02.2002, 25.11.2002, 06.03.2002, 26.06.2002, 15.11.2002, 11.02.2006, 06.10.2008, 27.01.2010, 20.05.2004, 22.07.2003, 24.12.2003, 27.07.2006, 09.03.2006, 24.01.2007, 28.12.2007, 07.07.2011 and exhibits mentioned in the impugned order as per his

undertaking letter dated 16.05.2016. In this regard, Counsel has given a letter dated 02.06.2016 stating therein that the same are not available and not relevant for the adjudication. Counsel has also requested to list the matter as it is at his risk. The matter is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 28 th day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip

SECTION IVB Listed on.04.07.2016 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.32 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 10832 OF 2015 Shyam Singh ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 06.04.2016, when the inter alia following order was passed:. “ The learned counsel for petitioner is directed to provide the copies of the pleadings to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 within a weeks' time and file proof. The respondents shall file the Counter Affidavit within a period of four weeks, thereafter. List again on 4.7.2016.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed the proof of serving the copies of pleadings to the Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 so far. It is also submitted that no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 01st day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. S.K. Sabharwal , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

REVISED ITEM NO.16+44 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.16 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2016 (CC No(s).9211/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.3769/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RATI RAM AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARYANA STATE IND. & INFRA. DEV.CORPN. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11339/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP) SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11499/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) Item No.44 : SLP(C)Nos......./2016 (CC Nos.8365-8434/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution application and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) SLP(C)No........./2016 (CC No.8883/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.10573-10647/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution applications and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,dv. For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. 1

Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv. Ms. Seema Kashyap,Adv. Mr. Rattan Lal,Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file SLPs is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

ITEM NO.16+44 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.16 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2016 (CC No(s).9211/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.3769/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RATI RAM AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARYANA STATE IND. & INFRA. DEV.CORPN. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11339/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP) SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11499/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) Item No.44 : SLP(C)Nos......./2016 (CC Nos.8365-8434/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution application and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) SLP(C)No........./2016 (CC No.8883/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.10573-10647/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution applications and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,dv. For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. 3

Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv. Ms. Seema Kashyap,Adv. Mr. Rattan Lal,Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Application for deletion of proforma respondents is granted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar 4

SECTION IVB Suppl. Listed on. Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) CC NO. 8883 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for deletion of the performa respondent) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing official translation) Veer Bhan & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V., Advocate on 26.04.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 6957 of 2011 barred by time by 109 days along with the applications for condonation of delay in filing SLP, application for deletion of the performa respondent and exemption from filing official translation. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) CC No. 9211 of 2016 Entitled Rati Ram & Ors. Versus Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. as both are arising out of common order/ common relied upon order. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with

this office report. Dated this the 28th day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 4/Bajaj

SECTION IVB Listed on.29.06.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.16 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 9211 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for deletion of the performa Respondent Nos.2 & 3). Rati Ram & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V, Advocate on 26.04.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 3769 of 2011 barred by time by 107 days along with the applications for condonation of delay in filing SLP and deletion of the performa Respondent Nos.2 & 3. It is further submitted that SLP (C) CC Nos. 85898603 of 2016 Entitled Harish Kumar Etc. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. arising out of common Order was directed on 09.05.2016 by Hon'ble Court. The matter is pending (Copy of order dated 09.05.2016 is enclosed). It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) Nos.30673082 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 11331148 of 2016 Entitled Bodan & Ors. Etc. Etc. Versus State of Haryana Through HSIDC IMT & Ors. Etc. arising out of common order was directed on 27.01.2016 by Hon'ble Court. SLP is

pending after notice (Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the copies of notification dated 07.03.2002 and 25.11.2002. In this regard, counsel has given a letter dated 02.05.2016 (Letter is enclosed in paper books at page no. 260) stating therein that the same are not relevant for adjudication of the case and has undertaken to produce the same at the time of hearing, if required by the Hon'ble Court and Counsel has requested to register and list the matter at his own risk. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27th day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Ms. Usha Nandini V , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

p$REVISEDITEM NO.16+44 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSItem No.16 :Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2016 (CC No(s).9211/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.3769/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana AtChandigarh)RATI RAM AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARYANA STATE IND. & INFRA. DEV.CORPN. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHSLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11339/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP)SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11499/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report)Item No.44 :SLP(C)Nos......./2016 (CC Nos.8365-8434/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution applicationand permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)SLP(C)No........./2016 (CC No.8883/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.10573-10647/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution applications and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,dv.For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv.1Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv.Ms. Seema Kashyap,Adv.Mr. Rattan Lal,Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. V. Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPermission to file SLPs is granted.Delay condoned.Substitution allowed.Application for deletion of proforma respondents isgranted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the arrayof parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar2ITEM NO.16+44 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSItem No.16 :Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2016 (CC No(s).9211/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.3769/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At

Chandigarh)RATI RAM AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARYANA STATE IND. & INFRA. DEV.CORPN. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHSLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11339/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP)SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC No.11499/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report)Item No.44 :SLP(C)Nos......./2016 (CC Nos.8365-8434/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution applicationand permission to file SLP and substitution and office report)SLP(C)No........./2016 (CC No.8883/2016)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.10573-10647/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution applications and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,dv.For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv.3Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv.Ms. Seema Kashyap,Adv.Mr. Rattan Lal,Adv.Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv.Mr. V. Sushant Gupta,Adv.Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv.For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Substitution allowed.Application for deletion of proforma respondents isgranted. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are deleted from the arrayof parties at the risk of the petitioners. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar4

ITEM NO.21+42 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8589-8603/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7260/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4554/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4557/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4751/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7261/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7262/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 384/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 385/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4549/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4558/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4559/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4562/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4563/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4569/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4572/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) HARISH KUMAR ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) along with SLP(C).........CC No. 8805 of 2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution application and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 09/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file the special leave petition in CC No. 8805 of 2016 is granted.

-2- Delay condoned. The application for substitution is allowed. To be heard after the judgement in Special Leave Petition(C) No. 10832 of 2015 and other connected matters is delivered. Proceedings pending before the Trial Court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2 nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 4843-4940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited versus Udal & Others etc. ], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] [SNEH BALA MEHRA] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION IVB Listed on.09.05.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.21 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.115 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 8589 8603 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Harish Kumar & Ors. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V, Advocate on 26.04.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 7260, 7261, 7262 of 2012, 384, 385, 4549, 4554, 4557, 4558, 4559, 4562, 4563, 4569, 4572 and 4751 of 2013. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 in RFA Nos. 7260 & 7262 of 2012, 7261 of 2012, 384 & 385 of 2013, 4549, 4554, 4557, 4558, 4559, 4569, 4572 & 4751 of 2013, 4562 & 4563 of 2013 are barred by time by 64, 63, 109, 107 and 112 days respectively and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that in SLP (C) CC Nos.74097476 of 2016 Entitled Sharmila & Anr. & Etc. Etc. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. arising out of common order was directed on 02.05.2016 by Hon'ble Court to tag with SLP (C) No. 10832 of 2015.(Copy of order

dated 02.05.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that in SLP (C) Nos.70867090 of 2016 Entitled Asylum Estate LLP Etc. Etc. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. arising out of common Order was directed on 08.03.2016 by Hon'ble Court to tag with SLP (C) CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016 @ SLP(C) No. 54445448 of 2016. (Copy of order dated 08.03.2016 is enclosed herewith)(Main matter is 3390233909 of 2014). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 06th day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Ms. Usha Nandini V , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

SECTION IVB Suppl. Listed on.09.05.2016 Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.12 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.3 (Application for substitution of the Lrs. of deceased petitioner) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.4 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 8805 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) Charan Singh & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. And Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V, Advocate on 28.04.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 4560 of 2013 along with the application for permission to file SLP It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution of deceased petitioner No. 1 namely Charan Singh which is barred by time by 328 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application.

It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 in RFA No. 4560 of 2013 is barred by time by 109 days and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) CC Nos. 85898603 of 2016 Entitled Harish Kumar Etc Versus State Of Haryana And Ors Etc as both are arising out of common Order. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 06th day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Ms. Usha Nandini V, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

2 ITEM NO.21+42 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8589-8603/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7260/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4554/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4557/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4751/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7261/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7262/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 384/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 385/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4549/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4558/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4559/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4562/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4563/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4569/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4572/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) HARISH KUMAR ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) along with SLP(C).........CC No. 8805 of 2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution application and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 09/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s)Signature Not Verified UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingDigitally signed bySukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2016.05.14 O R D E R10:11:17 ISTReason: Permission to file the special leave petition in CC No. 8805 of 2016 is granted. -2- Delay condoned. The application for substitution is allowed. To be heard after the judgement in Special LeavePetition(C) No. 10832 of 2015 and other connected matters isdelivered. Proceedings pending before the Trial Court shall remain

stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paidcompensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013, passed by thisCourt in Civil Appeal Nos. 4843-4940 of 2013 [Haryana StateIndustrial Development Corporation Limited versus Udal & Othersetc.], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. Thecompensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that mightbe passed by this Court. [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] [SNEH BALA MEHRA] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

REVISED ITEM NO.10+38 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.10 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.7409-7476/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.6274/2011, 5946/2011, 4046/2010, 6331/2011, 4598/2011, 4596/2011, 6312/2011, 6315/2011, 5952/2011, 4513/2011, 2412/2011, 3072/2011, 4215/2010, 4327/2011, 2445/2011, 3150/2010, 3068/2011, 1022/2012, 4567/2013, 2865/2011, 3229/2011, 4338/2010, 4172/2010, 3189/2011, 5942/2011, 6290/2011, 6244/2011, 5944/2011, 4314/2010, 3515/2010, 5955/2011, 6257/2011, 5950/2011, 6336/2011, 4599/2011, 6263/2011, 4597/2011, 6270/2011, 4188/2010, 4354/2010, 4186/2010, 4367/2010, 3801/2013, 4570/2013, 3365/2011, 3224/2011, 6264/2011, 4603/2011, 4019/2014, 6286/2011, 5948/2011, 7654/2011, 6299/2011, 89/2014, 4054/2010, 3523/2010, 4050/2010, 3388/2010, 4602/2011, 6304/2011, 3137/2010, 3842/2010, 4346/2010, 4187/2010, 4720/2011, 2423/2011, 2871/2011, 3213/2011, 2426/2011, 4719/2011, 3148/2010, 3181/2010, and CO No.185-CI/2010 in RFA No.3148/2010 and CO No. 184-CI/2010 in RFA No.3181/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SHARMILA & ANR. & ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Item No.38 : SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC Nos.8199-8213/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 02/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) *Proxy counsel for Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. 1

For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2 nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4843-4940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc. ], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar *Appearance slip not given even being asked. 2

ITEM NO.10+38 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.10 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos........./2016 (CC Nos.7409-7476/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.6274/2011, 5946/2011, 4046/2010, 6331/2011, 4598/2011, 4596/2011, 6312/2011, 6315/2011, 5952/2011, 4513/2011, 2412/2011, 4215/2010, 4327/2011, 2445/2011, 3150/2010, 3068/2011, 1022/2012, 4567/2013, 2865/2011, 3229/2011, 4338/2010, 4172/2010, 3515/2010, 5955/2011, 6257/2011, 5950/2011, 6336/2011, 4599/2011, 6263/2011, 4597/2011, 6270/2011, 4188/2010, 4354/2010, 4186/2010, 4367/2010, 3801/2013, 4570/2013, 3365/2011, 3224/2011, 6264/2011, 4603/2011, 4019/2014, 6286/2011, 5948/2011, 7654/2011, 6299/2011, 89/2014, 4054/2010, 3523/2010, 4050/2010, 3388/2010, 4602/2011, 6304/2011, 3137/2010, 3842/2010, 4346/2010, 4187/2010, 4720/2011, 2423/2011, 2871/2011, 3213/2011, 2426/2011, 4719/2011, 3148/2010, 3181/2010, and CO No.185-CI/2010 in RFA No.3148/2010 and CO No.184-CI/2010 in RFA No.3181/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SHARMILA & ANR. & ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Item No.38 : SLP(C)No......./2016 (CC Nos.8199-8213/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 02/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) *Proxy counsel for Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. For Respondent(s) 3

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2 nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4843-4940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc. ], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar *Appearance slip not given even being asked. 4

SECTION IVB Suppl. Listed on.02.05.2016 Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 81998213 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for deletion of the performa respondents) Dharm Singh & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V, Advocate on 28.03.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 2248, 3202, 3107, 3228, 3108, 3771, 3109, 3075, 5344, 5346, 3770, 6943, 3066 of 2011, 1573 of 2012 and 3185 of 2011 along with the applications for permission to file additional documents and deletion of the performa Respondent No. 4 in RFA No. 3066 of 2011 and Respondent No. 2 in RFA No. 3185 of 2011. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 in RFA Nos. 2248, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5344, 5346, 6943 of 2011 & 1573 of 2012 and RFA Nos. 3202, 3228 of 2011, 3771 of 2012, 3075, 3770, 3066 & 3185 of 2011 are barred by time by 80 & 78 days respectively and Counsel for the

petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) CC Nos. 74097476 of 2016 Entitled SHARMILA & ANR. & ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC as both are arising out of common Order. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 29th day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Ms. Usha Nandini V , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

SECTION IVB Listed on 2.5.2015 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.10 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.168 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) CC NO.740976 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Sharmila & Anr.Etc. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate on 18.1.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 6.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 6274, 5946/2011, 4046/2010, 6331/2011, 4598/2011, 4596/2011, 4215/2010, 4327/2011, 2445/2011, 3150/2010, 3068/2011, 1022/2012, 4567/2013, 2865/2011, 3229/2011, 4338/2010, 4172/2010, 3189/2011, 5942/2011, 6290/2011, 6244/2011, 5944/2011, 4314/2010, 3515/2010, 5955/2011, 6257/2011, 5950/2011, 6336/2011, 4599/2011, 6263/2011, 4597/2011, 6270/2011, 4188/2010, 4354/2010, 4186/2010, 4367/2010, 3801/2013, 4570/2013, 3365/2011, 3224/2011, 6264/2011, 4603/2011, 4019/2014, 6286/2011, 5948/2011, 7654/2011, 6299/2011, 89/2014, 4054/2010, 3523/2010, 4050/2010, 3388/2010, 4602/2011, 6304/2011, 3137/2010, 3842/2010, 4346/2010, 4187/2010, 4270/2011, 2423/2011, 2871/2011, 3213/2011, 2426/2011, 4719/2011, 3148/2010 and 3181/2010 and cross objection No. 185CI/2010 in RFA No. 3148/2010 and cross objection No. 184CI/2010 in RFA No. 3181/2010. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated

6.10.2015 is barred by time by 12, 11, 10, 9, 8 respectively days and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. I t is further submitted that SLP (C)CC No. 640810/2016 Entitled Ram Chander and Anr. Etc. Versus Haryana State and Ors. Etc. arising out of common order was directed on 11.4.2016 by the Hon'ble Court “List these matters after the decision in SLP (Civil)...CC Nos. 46144619 of 2016.” ( Copy of order dated 11.4.2016 is enclosed herewith). I t is further submitted that SLP (C)No.3661/2016 Entitled Kohli Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Orient Craft Ltd. Versus Haryana State and Ors. arising out of common order was directed on 26.2.2016 by the Hon'ble Court “Tag with SLP (C) Nos.30863135 of 2016.” (Copy of order dated 26.2.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the copies of orders dated 6.2.2002, 26.6.2002, 6.3.2002, 7.3.2002, 25.11.2002, 16.12.2009, 25.4.2004, 22.7.2003, 24.12.2003, 27.7.2009, 93.2006, 24.1.2007, 28.12.2007, 28.9.2013, 7.9.2011, 28.1.2004 and exhibits order . In this regard, counsel has given a letter dated 18.4.2014 stating therein that the same are not available and the documents are not relevant for adjudication at present and Counsel has requested to register and list the matter at his own risk. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 30th day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Dr. Kailash Chand , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

paid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013,passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4843-4940 of2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development CorporationLtd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the petitioners shall also bepaid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall besubject to final orders that might be passed by thisCourt. It would be open to the parties to place on recordthe details with regard to evidence, which has alreadybeen adduced, in tabular form.(Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar *Appearance slip not given even being asked. 2

ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10832/2015 SHYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 06/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for petitioner is directed to provide the copies of the pleadings to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 within a weeks' time and file proof. The respondents shall file the Counter Affidavit within a period of four weeks, thereafter. List again on 4.7.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

SECTION IVB Listed on.06.04.2016 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.64 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 10832 OF 2015 Shyam Singh ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 16.02.2016, when the inter alia following order was passed:. “ The office report indicates that the service of notice is complete on both the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr. Amit Kumar, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of both the respondents. He seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama. If vakalatnama is filed, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall serve copy of the pleadings to the said counsel within a week's time and file proof. Ld. Counsel for the respondent shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks thereafter. In case the above counsel has failed to file the vakalatnama within the specific period of one week in that event the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court and if filed list before this Court on 6.4.2016. ” It is submitted that there are total 14 respondents and Respondent No. 3 to 14 has been delted from the array of parties vide Court's order dated 13.04.2015. It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of Repondent Nos. 1 & 2 which is barred by time by

37 days as per Court's order dated 16.02.2016. He has not filed counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. It is also submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of serving the pleadings to the counsel for respondent so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 5th day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. S.K. Sabharwal , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

t ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10832/2015 SHYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 06/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for petitioner is directed to provide the copies of the pleadings to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 within a weeks' time and file proof. The respondents shall file the Counter Affidavit within a period of four weeks, thereafter. List again on 4.7.2016.Signature Not Verified (M V RAMESH)Digitally signed by RegistrarMadhu Grover MGDate: 2016.04.0616:55:14 SCTReason:

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1444/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1437/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1438/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1439/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1440/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1441/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1442/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1443/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 04/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Adesh Kumar Gill, Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Ms. Ankita Chadha, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the unregistered applications. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The revised office report on default dated 04.02.2016 was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 08.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: passed: “ Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted seven days time to file appropriate application.” It is submitted that Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 are reported to be dead. Counsel for the petitioner has on 15.01.2016 filed application to bring on record their LRs. There is a delay of 773 and 876 days respectively in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has on 09.02.2016 filed common application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application with prayer for setting aside abatement. But separate application for setting aside abatement has not been filed and other defects regarding heading and prayer in the applications have not been removed despite order of this Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) dated 08.02.2016 and

this Registry's letter dated 11.02.2016. Time granted for the same has expired on 15.02.2016. The office report on default is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers). Dated this the 26 th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. 116, Post office Block, S.C.I Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, S.C.I Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Library2, Supreme Court Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. H. No. 100, Sukhdev Vihar, New Delhi25 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip

H ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1444/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1437/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1438/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1439/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1440/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1441/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1442/2011 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1443/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 04/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Adesh Kumar Gill, Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Ms. Ankita Chadha, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified Issue notice on the unregistered applications.Digitally signed byVINOD KUMARDate: 2016.04.0616:35:29 ISTReason: (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.10+46 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 4614-4691/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2867/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3203/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3374/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2869/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3061/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6146/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3071/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6504/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3376/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6502/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7112/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4358/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3199/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2616/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4331/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1197/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3076/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2872/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4199/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6505/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3221/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1971/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7116/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5360/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3104/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4330/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4574/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2868/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1969/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3078/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4352/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3184/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4113/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3206/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6497/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4136/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3215/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3373/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7125/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4359/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1196/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 626/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2249/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5359/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6498/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3708/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1714/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1023/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2864/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3212/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3375/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3063/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4200/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6499/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3064/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3230/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7110/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4564/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4363/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3102/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5902/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6525/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2247/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4171/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1972/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3073/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3211/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3364/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3103/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3197/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5343/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3175/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4181/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4446/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3193/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4842/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6482/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 624/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)

-2- BALRAJ SINGH AND ORS AND ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and interim relief and office report) With S.L.P.(C) …........... CC 5752-5756 of 2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 01/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Aditya Soni, Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file the special leave petitions is granted. Delay in filing the substitution applications is condoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.5444-5448 of 2016 arising out of CC Nos. 2585-2586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be

-3- paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings. [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] [SNEH BALA MEHRA] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION IVB Suppl. Listed on.01.04.2016 Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.15 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 575256 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order) Paramjeet Panag & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate on 08.03.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 4154, 7338, 6342, 7370 & 6345 of 2011 barred by time by 64 days along with the applications for condonation of delay in filing SLP and permission to file additional documents and exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) CC Nos. 46144691 of 2016 Entitled Balraj Singh And Ors And Etc Etc Versus State Of Haryana And Ors Etc. as both are arising out of common Order. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished the copies of award dated 20.05.2004, 22.07.2003, 24.12.2003, 27.07.2006,

19.03.2006 and notification dated 18.11.2002. In this regard, counsel has given a letter dated 18.03.2016 (Letter is enclosed in paper books at page no. 330) stating therein that the same are not required for the purpose of present petition as have undertaken to produce the same at the time of hearing, if required by the Hon'ble Court and Counsel has requested to register and list the matter at his own risk. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 31st day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

SECTION IV B Listed on 01.04.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 10 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.114 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1522 (Application for substitution to bring on record the LRs. of deceased petitioners) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2330 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 4614 4691 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Balraj Singh & Ors. Etc. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 06.01.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 4330,5359 of 2010, 2872/2012, 4574/2013, 4199, 6505, 4200, 6498, 6504, 3376, 3374, 6499, 2249, 3215, 3373, 6502, 3064, 7215, 2247, 3230, 2868, 3221 of 2011, 4171, 4359/2010, 2869, 3061 of 2011, 1971, 7112, 1972, 7116, 1969, 7110 of 2013, 3073, 6146, 3078, 3708/2011, 4358/2010, 1714, 3199/2011, 2616, 1023,4564/2013, 4331/2010, 1197/2011, 4363, 5360, 4352/2010, 1196, 3184, 4113, 2864, 3071, 2867, 3076, 3211, 3364, 3103, 3212, 3102, 3203, 3104, 3206, 3197, 5343/2011, 3175, 4181/2010, 4446, 5902/2013, 3375, 6497, 3193, 4136, 4842, 3063, 6482, 6525, 624 and 626 of 2011

alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution to bring on record the LRs of deceased petitioner no. 4 namely Ram Kishan in RFA No. 4446, 624, 626 of 2011, Petitioner no. 1 namely Ram Phal in RFA No. 4136/2011, petitioner no. 5 namely Chand Bai in RFA No. 3063/2011, petitioner no. 1 namely Ram Kumar in RFA no. 6482/2011, petitioner no. 1 namely Hoti Ram in RFA No. 6525 of 2011 which are barred by time by 928,1086,302,1403 and 3929 days respectively and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) No. 30673082 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 11331148 of 2016 entitled Bodan & Ors. Etc. Etc. versus State of Haryana Through HSIDC IMT & Ors. Etc. arising out of common order was directed by the Hon'ble Court on 27.01.2016. SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is enclosed herewith). (Main SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014) It is further submitted that SLP (C) No. nos. 70867090 of 2016 @ CC No. 3942 of 2016 entitled Asylum Estate LLP Etc. Etc. versus State of Haryana & Ors. Was directed to be tagged with SLP (C) No. 54445448/2016 (CC nos. 25852586/2016) by the Hon'ble Court on 08.03.2016 (Copy of order dated 08.03.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not furnished copy of order dated 07.03.2002, 25.11.2002, 27.09.2005, 26.02.2002, 18.11.2002, 28.12.2007, 24.12.2003, 30.11.2010, 20.05.2004, 22.07.2003, 27.07.2006, 24.01.2007, relied upon judgment dated RFA Nos. 2374, 5899 of 2013 and exhibits mentioned in the impugned judgment as per his

undertaking letter dated 02.02.2016. In this regard, Counsel has given a letter dated 14.03.2016 (at page no. 489 of the Paper Books) stating therein that the same are not available and are not relevant for adjudication of the matter and has requested to list the matter before the Hon'ble Court at his risk. The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 31 st day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip

ò% ITEM NO.10+46 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 4614-4691/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2867/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3203/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3374/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2869/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3061/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6146/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3071/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6504/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3376/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6502/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7112/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4358/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3199/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2616/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4331/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1197/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3076/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2872/2012 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4199/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6505/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3221/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1971/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7116/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5360/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3104/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4330/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4574/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2868/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1969/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3078/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4352/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3184/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4113/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3206/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6497/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4136/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3215/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3373/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7125/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4359/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1196/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 626/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2249/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5359/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6498/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3708/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1714/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1023/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2864/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3212/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3375/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3063/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4200/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6499/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3064/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3230/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 7110/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4564/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4363/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3102/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5902/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6525/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2247/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4171/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 1972/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3073/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3211/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3364/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3103/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3197/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No.Signature Not Verified 5343/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3175/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No.Digitally signed bySukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2016.04.02 4181/2010 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4446/2013 06/10/2015 in RFA No.11:06:54 ISTReason: 3193/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4842/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 6482/2011 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 624/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) -2-BALRAJ SINGH AND ORS AND ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andpermission to file SLP and substitution and interim relief and office

report)With S.L.P.(C) .............. CC 5752-5756 of 2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 01/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Aditya Soni, Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file the special leave petitions isgranted. Delay in filing the substitution applications iscondoned. The applications for substitution are allowed. Tag with S.L.P.(C) Nos.5444-5448 of 2016 arising out ofCC Nos. 2585-2586 of 2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be -3-paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject tothe final outcome of the present proceedings. [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] [SNEH BALA MEHRA] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No.........../2016 (CC No(s).3942/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.7913, 7914, 7915, 7916 of 2013 and dated 13/10/2015 in RFA No.2089/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) ASYLUM ESTATE LLP ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 08/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.........CC Nos.2585-2586/2016. Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court, be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the present proceedings. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB Listed on 08.03.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.16 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 3942 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned order) Asylum Estate LLP Etc. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V., Advocate on 01.02.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 7913, 7914, 7915, 7916 of 2013 and order dated 13.10.2015 in RFA No. 2089 of 2014 along with the application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned order. It is further submitted that SLP filed against the Order dated 13.10.2015 is within time, whereas there is a delay of 28 days in filing the SLP against the order dated 06.10.2015 in RFA No. 7915 of 2013 . Counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) Nos. 54445448 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 25852586 of 2016 entitled M/S. Janus Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd Etc. Etc. Versus State

Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc. arising out of common was directed by the Hon'ble Court on 15.02.2016 to tag with SLP (C) No. 30673082 of 2016. (Copy of order dated 15.02.2016 is enclosed herewith). (Main matter SLP (C) No. 3390233909/2014). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 4 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Ms. Usha Nandini V. , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip

&ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No.........../2016 (CC No(s).3942/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.7913, 7914, 7915, 7916 of 2013 and dated 13/10/2015 in RFA No.2089/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)ASYLUM ESTATE LLP ETC ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 08/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Mr. Surender Singh,Adv.For Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Tag with SLP(C)Nos.........CC Nos.2585-2586/2016.Compensation, as determined by the Reference Court,be paid to the land owners. The said payment shall besubject to the final outcome of the present proceedings. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.3661/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4646/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) KOHLI HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., ORIENT CRAFT LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 26/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with SLP(C) Nos.3086-3135 of 2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB Listed on.26.02.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.17 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 3661 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Kohli Holdings Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate on 01.02.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 4646 of 2010 (O & M). It is further submitted that SLP (C) Nos.30863135 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 14031452 of 2016 Entitled Satish Kumar Gupta And Etc. Etc. Versus State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. arising out of common order was directed on 27.01.2016 by Hon'ble Court and Tag the matter with SLP (C) No. 10832 of 2015. SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is enclosed herewith)(Main matter is SLP (C) Nos.30673082 of 2016 @ CC Nos.11331148 of 2016). It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.02.2016 filed Annexures P3 to P10 as per his undertaking letter dated 04.02.2016 and the same are circulated with this office report. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 25th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Avinash Kumar , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10832/2015 SHYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 16/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharath Mittal,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the s ervice of notice is complete on both the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr. Amit Kumar, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of both the respondents. He seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama. If vakalatnama is filed, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall serve copy of the pleadings to the said counsel within a week's time and file proof. Ld. Counsel for the respondent shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks thereafter. In case the above counsel has failed to file the vakalatnama within the specific period of one week in that event the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court and if filed list before this Court on 6.4.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

SECTION IVB Listed on.16.02.2016 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.63 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 10832 OF 2015 Shyam Singh ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 16.02.2016, when the inter alia following order was passed:. “ SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to both the respondents within four weeks. List the matter again on 16.02.2016.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 11.12.2015 filed affidavit with proof of Dasti service in respect of both the respondents but no one has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on their behalf. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 12th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. S.K. Sabharwal , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

6 ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10832/2015 SHYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 16/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharath Mittal,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the service of notice is complete on both the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr. Amit Kumar, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of both the respondents. He seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama. If vakalatnama is filed, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall serve copy of the pleadings to the said counsel within a week's time and file proof. Ld. Counsel for the respondent shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks thereafter. In case the above counsel has failed to file the vakalatnama within the specific period of one week in that event the matter shall be processed for listing before theSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu Grover Hon'ble Court and if filed list before this Court on 6.4.2016.Date: 2016.02.1616:57:34 SCTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....../2016 (CC No.2585-2586/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos. 2090/2014, 6942/2012, 6943/2012, 4556/2013 and 4568/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) M/S. JANUS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT. LTD ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 15/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.3067-3082 of 2016. Compensation as determined by the Reference Court be paid to the land owners. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB Listed on.15.02.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.25 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.12 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 25852586 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order) M/s. Janus Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini. V, Advocate on 28.01.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 2090 of 2014, RFA Nos. 6942, 6943 of 2012 and RFA Nos. 4556 and 4568 of 2013 along with the application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order. It is further submitted that SLP filed against the Order dated 06.10.2015 in RFA Nos. 2090 of 2014, 6942 and 6943 of 2012 is within time, whereas there is a delay of 21 days in filing the SLP against the Order dated 06.10.2015 in RFA Nos. 4556 and 4568 of 2013 and Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP. It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) Nos.306782 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 11331148 of 2016 Entitled Bodan And Ors. Etc. Etc. Versus State Of Haryana Through Hsidc Imt And Ors. Etc. arising out of common Order was

directed on 27.01.2016 by Hon'ble Court. SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 27.01.2016 is enclosed herewith)(Main matter is SLP (C) Nos. 3390233909 of 2014). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 12th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Ms. Usha Nandini. V , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

SECTION IVB Listed on.15.02.2016 Court No.2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.25 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 415255 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF M/s. Spritutual Developers Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V, Advocate on 01.02.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 678, 2542 and 2543 of 2014 and order dated 13.10.2015 in RFA No. 2119 of 2014. It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) No. 25852586 of 2016 Entitled M/s. Janus Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. as both are arising out of common Order. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 12th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Ms. Usha Nandini V , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty

¼ ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....../2016 (CC No.2585-2586/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos. 2090/2014, 6942/2012, 6943/2012, 4556/2013 and 4568/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) M/S. JANUS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT. LTD ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4152-4155/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 15/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Tag with SLP(Civil)Nos.3067-3082 of 2016. Compensation as determined by the Reference Court be paid to the land owners.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byANITA MALHOTRADate: 2016.04.2211:38:34 ISTReason: (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.33902-33909/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA No.1444/2011, RFA No.1437/2011, RFA No.1438/2011, RFA No.1439/2011, RFA No.1440/2011, RFA No.1441/2011, RFA No.1442/2011, RFA No.1443/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 08/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Ankita Chadha,Adv. For Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted seven days time to file appropriate application. (Rachna) (Chander Bala) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The revised office report on default dated 16.01.2016 was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 18.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: passed: “ Mr. Annam D.N. Rao, Learned Advocate onRecord, appearing for the petitioner, states that the Office Report shall be complied with in two weeks' time .” It is submitted that Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 are reported to be dead. Counsel for the petitioner has on 15.01.2016 filed application to bring on record their LRs. There is a delay of 773 and 876 days respectively in filing substitution application. But Counsel has not filed separate applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside abatement etc. despite above order dated 18.01.2016. Time granted for the same has expired on 01.02.2016.

The office report on default is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers). Dated this the 4 th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. 116, Post office Block, S.C.I Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, S.C.I Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Library2, Supreme Court Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. H. No. 100, Sukhdev Vihar, New Delhi25 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip

.ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.33902-33909/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA No.1444/2011, RFA No.1437/2011, RFA No.1438/2011, RFA No.1439/2011, RFA No.1440/2011, RFA No.1441/2011, RFA No.1442/2011,RFA No.1443/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 08/02/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Ms. Ankita Chadha,Adv.For Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s)Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Mr. Surender Singh,Adv.Ms. Usha Nandini,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner prays for and isgranted seven days time to file appropriate application. (Rachna) (Chander Bala) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.16+35 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.16 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos.........../2016 (CC No(s).1133-1148/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.4837/2010, 4364/2010, 4158/2010, 3503/2010, 4177/2010, 3145/2010, 4674/2010, 4334/2010, 4235/2010, 4341/2010, 4236/2010, 4328/2010, 5482/2010, 4342/2010, 4740/2010 and 4357/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BODAN & ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH HSIDC IMT & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Item No.35 : SLP(C)No........../2016 (CC Nos.1403-1452/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. And permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 27/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. CC 1133-48 Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. CC 1403-1452 Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv. Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Aditya Soni,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Maruti Suzuki Mr. Ajay Thakur,Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. 1

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petitions, filed by the LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications is condoned. Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shall remain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have been paid compensation as per judgment dated 2 nd July, 2013, passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4843-4940 of 2013 [ Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc. ], the petitioners shall also be paid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall be subject to final orders that might be passed by this Court. It would be open to the parties to place on record the details with regard to evidence, which has already been adduced, in tabular form. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

SECTION IVB Listed on.27.1.2016 Court No. 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 16 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1-9 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.10-11 (Application for substitution) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.12-13 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 1133-48 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing official translation) Bodan (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana Thr.HSIDCIMT & Anr.Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Ms. Usha Nandini V., Advocate on 02.01.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.10.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 4837 of 2010, 4364 of 2010, 4158 of 2010, 3503 of 2010, 4177 of 2010, 3145 of 2010, 4674 of 2010, 4334 of 2010, 4235 of 2010, 4341 of 2010, 4236 of 2010, 4328 of 2010, 5482 of 2010, 4342 of 2010, 4740 of 2010, 4357 of 2010 along with the applications for permission to file additional documents and exemption from filing official translation. It is further submitted that Counsel for petitioner has also filed an application for substitution of

deceased Appellant No. 1 in RFA No. 4837 of 2010 and Respondent No. 1 in RFA No. 4364 of 2010 namely Bodan Singh and Appellant No. 2 in RFA No. 4837 of 2010 and Respondent No. 2 in RFA No. 4364 of 2010 namely Charan Singh which is barred by time by 1681 days and 179 days and Counsel has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) No. 10832 of 2015 Entitled Shyam Singh Versus State Of Haryana And Ors. arising out of common followed Judgment was directed on 13.04.2015 by Hon'ble Court. (Copy of order dated 13.04.2015 is enclosed herewith. Main Matter S.L.P. (C) Nos. 33902-33909 of 2014. It is further submitted that in SLP (C) No. 33240 of 2011 Entitled Ram Phal Singh Versus State Of Haryana & Ors. arising out of common followed Judgment, while granting leave, appeal (Civil Appeal No. 4985 of 2013) was allowed on 02.07.2013 by Hon'ble Court. (Copy of the Order dated 02.07.2013 is enclosed herewith). Main matter C.A. Nos. 4843-4940/2013. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :-Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 4/Bajaj

À ITEM NO.16+35 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Item No.16 : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)Nos.........../2016 (CC No(s).1133-1148/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA Nos.4837/2010, 4364/2010, 4158/2010, 3503/2010, 4177/2010, 3145/2010, 4674/2010, 4334/2010, 4235/2010, 4341/2010, 4236/2010, 4328/2010, 5482/2010, 4342/2010, 4740/2010 and 4357/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BODAN & ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH HSIDC IMT & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Item No.35 : SLP(C)No........../2016 (CC Nos.1403-1452/2016) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. And permission to file SLP and substitution and office report) Date : 27/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. CC 1133-48 Ms. Usha Nandini V.,Adv. CC 1403-1452 Mr. V.K. Bali,Sr.Adv. Ms. Kiran Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal,Adv. Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Aditya Soni,Adv. For Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Maruti SuzukiSignature Not Verified Mr. Ajay Thakur,Adv.Digitally signed bySarita PurohitDate: 2016.01.29 Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv.16:33:24 ISTReason: 1 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petitions, filed bythe LRs. is granted. Delay in filing substitution applications iscondoned.

Substitution allowed. Issue notice by speed post. Tag with SLP(C)No.10832/2015. Proceedings pending before the trial court shallremain stayed. It is directed that if other land owners have beenpaid compensation as per judgment dated 2nd July, 2013,passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4843-4940 of2013 [Haryana State Industrial Development CorporationLtd. Vs. Udal & Ors. Etc.], the petitioners shall also bepaid accordingly. The compensation so paid shall besubject to final orders that might be passed by thisCourt. It would be open to the parties to place on recordthe details with regard to evidence, which has alreadybeen adduced, in tabular form.(Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2

ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.33902-33909/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA No.1437/2011, RFA No.1438/2011, RFA No.1439/2011, RFA No.1440/2011, RFA No.1441/2011, RFA No.1442/2011, RFA No.1443/2011, RFA No.1444/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) WITH SLP(C) No.10832/2015 (Office report on default) Date : 18/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Surender Singh,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Aakash,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Annam D.N. Rao, Learned Advocate-on-Record, appearing for the petitioner, states that the Office Report shall be complied with in two weeks time. (Rachna) SR.P.A. (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on 18.01.2016 Court No. 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 39 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) REVISED OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned alongwith connected matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 09.12.2015, when inter alia following Order was passed: “ SLP(C) No.3390233909/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriate steps in respect of the unserved deceased respondents in spite of last chance granted. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter.” It is submitted that Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 are reported to be dead. Counsel for the petitioner has on 15.01.2016 filed application to bring on record their LRs. There is a delay of 773 and 876 days respectively in filing substitution application. But Counsel has not filed separate applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside abatement etc.

The office report on default is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers). Dated this the 16 th day of January, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. 116, Post office Block, S.C.I Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, S.C.I Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Library2, Supreme Court Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. H. No. 100, Sukhdev Vihar, New Delhi25 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip

HITEM NO.39 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.33902-33909/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011in RFA No.1437/2011, RFA No.1438/2011, RFA No.1439/2011, RFANo.1440/2011, RFA No.1441/2011, RFA No.1442/2011, RFA No.1443/2011,RFA No.1444/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)WITHSLP(C) No.10832/2015(Office report on default) Date : 18/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.Mr. Sudipto Sircar,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv.Mr. Surender Singh,Adv.Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. Aakash,Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RMr. Annam D.N. Rao, Learned Advocate-on-Record,appearing for the petitioner, states that the OfficeReport shall be complied with in two weeks time.(Rachna) SR.P.A. (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty)COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned alongwith connected matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 09.12.2015, when inter alia following Order was passed: “ SLP(C) No.3390233909/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriate steps in respect of the unserved deceased respondents in spite of last chance granted. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter.” It is submitted that Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 are reported to be dead. But Counsel for the petitioner has not filed application to bring on record their LRs. The office report on default is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers). Dated this the 16 th day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. 116, Post office Block, S.C.I Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. 111, Lawyer's Chamber, S.C.I Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Library2, Supreme Court Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. H. No. 100, Sukhdev Vihar, New Delhi25 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip

ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 09/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Ankita Chadha,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.Apoorv Garg,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr.Aakash Pirzada,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R … ...2

ITEM NO.62 -2- SLP(C) No.33902-33909/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriate steps in respect of the unserved deceased respondents in spite of last chance granted. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to both the respondents within four weeks. List the matter again on 16.02.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

P ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 09/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Ankita Chadha,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.Apoorv Garg,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr.Aakash Pirzada,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv.Signature Not Verified Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.12.0916:33:03 TLTReason: UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ......2ITEM NO.62 -2-SLP(C) No.33902-33909/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriatesteps in respect of the unserved deceased respondents in spite oflast chance granted. Therefore, the matter shall be processed forlisting before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further futuredirections. Await orders and list thereafter.SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proofof dasti service of notice already issued to both the respondentswithin four weeks. List the matter again on 16.02.2016.

(M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.72 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos. 33902-33909/2014 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 13.7.2015 of this Court. SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 9.12.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

SECTION IVB Listed on 23.09.2015 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 72 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014 AND 10832 OF 2015. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 13.07.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ SLP(C) Nos.3390233909/2014 The office report suggests that the respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.33906/14 and respondent No.7 in SLP(C) No.33907/14 have expired. Accordingly, Ld.counsel for the petitioner in both the SLPs to file applications for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said respondents within four weeks as last opportunity. SLP(C) No.10832/2015 Await service in respect of both the respondents. Post both the matters again on 23.09.2015.” SLP(C) Nos.3390233909/2014 It is submitted that Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner has on 22.01.2015 filed affidavit of dasti service of show cause notice alongwith proof which reveals that service of show cause notice has been effected on all the respondents. It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has on 20.02.2015 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) Nos.

33904 & 33908/2014 and on behalf of proposed LRs of deceased Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 but no application for substitution of LRs of Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 has been filed by any of the Advocates so far. It is further submitted that Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 is reported to be dead. But application for substitution of her LR has not been filed so far. It is further submitted that Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Advocate for Respondent No. 10 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 has expired and notice for alternative arrangement has been issued on 25.07.2015 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf so far. Respondent No. 9, 11 to 13 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 are represented through Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate. It is further submitted that none of the represented respondents have filed Counter Affidavits so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete in respect of Respondent No. 1 (since dead) in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 (since dead) and 10 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014. SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 It is submitted that neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back in respect of both the respondents (i.e. State). Service of show cause notice is not complete. The matters are listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip

ITEM NO.72 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 23/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Apoorv Garg,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.09.2415:38:30 SCTReason:ITEM NO.72 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) Nos. 33902-33909/2014 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the orderdated 13.7.2015 of this Court.SLP(C) No. 10832/2015

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to therespondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition ispermitted to be served. List again on 9.12.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 13/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Neelam Jain,adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.33902-33909/2014 The office report suggests that the respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.33906/14 and respondent No.7 in SLP(C) No.33907/14 have expired. … .......2

ITEM NO.62 -2- Accordingly, Ld.counsel for the petitioner in both the SLPs to file applications for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said respondents within four weeks as last opportunity. SLP(C) No.10832/2015 Await service in respect of both the respondents. Post both the matters again on 23.09.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar SB

SECTION IVB Listed on 13.07.2015 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 62 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 33902 33909 OF 2014 AND 10832 OF 2015. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Haryana State Industrial & Infras. Development Corp. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP (C) Nos. 3390233909/2014 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 23.03.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ SLP(C) No.33904/2014 The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. SLP(C) No.33908/2014 The office report is that the respondent No.1 has expired. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the lrs.of the said respondent. List again on 13.07.2015. In all other matters, service of notice is complete on the respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed in that context, the same shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones get ready.” It is submitted that Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner has on 22.01.2015 filed service of dasti show cause notice alongwith proof which reveals that service of show cause notice has been effected on all the respondents.

It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has on 20.02.2015 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) Nos. 33904 & 33908/2014 and on behalf of LRs of deceased Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 but no application for substitution of LRs of Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 has been filed by any of the Advocates. It is further submitted that Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 is reported to be dead. But application for substitution of her LR has not been filed so far. It is further submitted that Respondent No. 10 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 is represented through Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Advocate while Respondent No. 9, 11 to 13 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 are represented through Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate. But none of the represented respondents have filed Counter Affidavits so far. Service of show cause notice is complete on all the respondents except Respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 33906/2014 and Respondent No. 7 in SLP (C) No. 33907/2014 who have been reported to be dead. SLP (C) No. 10832/2015 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. I.A. for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos. 3390233909 of 2014 (@ CC Nos. 1854218549 of 2014).” Accordingly, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 30.04.2015.

It is submitted that neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back so far. Service is not complete. The matters are listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report. Dated this the 10 th day of July, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR haokip

Ê ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10832/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 13/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Neelam Jain,adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified SLP(C) Nos.33902-33909/2014Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.07.1416:15:54 ISTReason: The office report suggests that the respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.33906/14 and respondent No.7 in SLP(C) No.33907/14 have expired. ..........2ITEM NO.62 -2-Accordingly, Ld.counsel for the petitioner in both the SLPs to fileapplications for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of thesaid respondents within four weeks as last opportunity.SLP(C) No.10832/2015

Await service in respect of both the respondents. Post both the matters again on 23.09.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10832/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/02/2015 in RFA No. 1082/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SHYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for deletion of proforma respondents and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and office report) Date : 13/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. I.A. for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos. 33902-33909 of 2014 (@ CC Nos. 18542-18549 of 2014). (MADHU BALA) (ASHA SONI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB Listed on.13.04.2015 Court No.8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.36 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 10832 OF 2015 AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 (Application for deletion of proforma respondent) Shyam Singh ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Advocate on 26.03.2015 against the Judgment and Order dated 06.02.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 1082 of 2011 along with the application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has also filed an application for deletion of proforma respondent nos. 314 from the memo of parties and the same is registered as I.A. No. 2. It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) No.33902909 of 2014 @ CC No. 1854218549 of 2014 Entitled Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corpn. Ltd. Versus Des Raj & Ors. Etc. Etc. arising out of common followed Judgment was directed on 01.12.2014 by Hon'ble Court. SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 01.12.2014 is enclosed herewith).

It is further submitted that in SLP (C) No. 1796218059 of 2011 Entitle Haryana State Indusl.Devt.Corp.Ltd. Vs. Udal & Ors.Etc.Etc. arising out of similar issue, while granting leave , appeal (Civil Appeal No. 48434940 of 2013) was allowed on 02.07.2013 by Hon'ble Court. (Copy of order dated 02.07.2013 is annexed as Annexure P3 at page nos. 4575 in the paper books). It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.29496 of 2013 Entitled Rameshwar Dass & Ors. Versus Land Acquisition Collector Cum Sdo& Ors . arising out of common followed Judgment was dismposed of on 13.09.2013 by Hon'ble Court. (Copy of order dated 13.09.2013 is enclosed herewith). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 10th day of April, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. S.K. Sabharwal , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR YKS/chetan

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10832/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/02/2015 in RFA No. 1082/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SHYAM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for deletion of proforma respondents and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and office report) Date : 13/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal,Adv. Mr. Anupam Yadav,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. I.A. for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C)Nos. 33902-33909 of 2014 (@ CC Nos. 18542-18549 of 2014).Signature Not Verified (MADHU BALA) (ASHA SONI)Digitally signed by COURT MASTER COURT MASTERMadhu BalaDate: 2015.04.1317:58:03 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.92 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) Date : 23/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Neelam Jain,adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.33904/2014 The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. SLP(C) No.33908/2014 The office report is that the respondent No.1 has expired. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the lrs. of the said respondent. List again on 13.07.2015. …....2

ITEM NO.92 -2- In all other matters, service of notice is complete on the respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed in that context, the same shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones get ready. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.121 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) Date : 19/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Vaishali R.,adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr.Mohan Das,adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr.Apoorv Garg,adv. Dr.Monika Gosain,adv. Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra,adv. Mr.Himanshu Sharma,adv. Ms.Amita Gupta,adv. Ms.Pooja Tandon,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra, Ld.counsel appears for the respondent Nos.1-6 and 8. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. Mr.Apoorv, Ld.counsel appears for the State of Haryana in SLP(C) No.33902 and 33907/14. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. … ...2

ITEM NO.121 -2- Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the other respondents. List again on 26.03.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

\204 ITEM NO.121 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33902-33909/2014 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and interim relief and office report) Date : 19/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Vaishali R.,adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr.Mohan Das,adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr.Apoorv Garg,adv. Dr.Monika Gosain,adv. Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra,adv. Mr.Himanshu Sharma,adv. Ms.Amita Gupta,adv. Ms.Pooja Tandon,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra, Ld.counsel appears for the respondent Nos.1-6 and 8. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Mr.Apoorv, Ld.counsel appears for the State of Haryana inSushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.01.21 SLP(C) No.33902 and 33907/14. He seeks and is given four weeks time10:10:56 ISTReason: to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. ......2ITEM NO.121 -2- Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of fourweeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of noticealready issued to the other respondents.

List again on 26.03.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 18542-18549/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1444/2011, RFA No. 1437/2011, RFA No. 1438/2011, RFA No. 1439/2011, RFA No. 1440/2011, RFA No. 1441/2011, RFA No. 1442/2011, RFA No. 1443/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) I.A. 1-8/2014(with c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr Abhishek Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Neelam Jain, Adv. Mr. A. Venkatesh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is informed that this case is covered by the decision of this Court in “Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs. Udal and others etc. Etc.” reported in (2013) 14 SCC 506 decided on 2 nd July, 2013. Issue notice both on the application for condonation of delay as well as SLP retunable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. (Neeta) (Suman Jain) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER

b ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 18542-18549/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/10/2011 in RFA No. 1444/2011, RFA No. 1437/2011, RFA No. 1438/2011, RFA No. 1439/2011, RFA No. 1440/2011, RFA No. 1441/2011, RFA No. 1442/2011, RFA No. 1443/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DES RAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) I.A. 1-8/2014(with c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. Mr Abhishek Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Neelam Jain, Adv. Mr. A. Venkatesh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is informed that this case is covered by the decision of this Court in "Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited vs. Udal and others etc. Etc." reported in (2013) 14 SCC 506 decided on 2nd July, 2013. Issue notice both on the application for condonation of delay as well as SLP retunable within four weeks.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Dasti, in addition, is permitted.Neeta SapraDate: 2014.12.0316:03:13 ISTReason: (Neeta) (Suman Jain) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA ETC ETC v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC

Full Judgment Text

(2010) 11 SCC 175 2

(2012) 7 SCC 200 3

(2012) 7 SCC 721 4

(2013) 14 SCC 506

(2008) 14 SCC 745 6

(2011) 8 SCC 91

(2015) 10 SCC 469

(1980) 3 SCC 223 10

(1986) 2 SCC 343 11

(1995) 1 SCC 221 12

(1995) 2 SCC 326

(2006) 7 SCC 578

(2011) 2 SCC 54

(2010) 11 SCC 175 2

(2012) 7 SCC 200 3

(2012) 7 SCC 721 2

(2013) 14 SCC 506 5

(2008) 14 SCC 745 6

(2011) 8 SCC 91 3

(2015) 10 SCC 469 6

(1980) 3 SCC 223 10

(1986) 2 SCC 343 11

(1995) 1 SCC 221 12

(1995) 2 SCC 326 7

(2006) 7 SCC 578 10

(2011) 2 SCC 54 13

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status