Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2014 / Diary 10180

HARISH CHANDRA VARSHNEY v. MOTILAL OSWAL PROPRIETOR

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10180/2014

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

28-08-2014

Bench

Petitioner

HARISH CHANDRA VARSHNEY

Respondent

MOTILAL OSWAL PROPRIETOR

Primary Holding

A review petition filed with unexplained inordinate delay is liable to dismissal on grounds of delay alone, and even on merits if no reason exists to interfere with the impugned order.

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

CHAMBER MATTER-2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(C) No. 1733/2014 IN C.A. No. 1018/2013 HARISH CHANDRA VARSHNEY & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOTILAL OSWAL PROPRIETOR & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. for c/delay in filing Review Petition) Date : 28/08/2014 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The Review Petition is dismissed both on the ground of delay as well as on merits. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 1733 OF 2014 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 1018 OF 2013 HARISH CHANDRA VARHSNEY AND ORS. .. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MOTILAL OSWAL, PROPRIETOR & ANR. .. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R There is a delay of 388 days in filing the review petition, which has not been satisfactorily explained. Even otherwise, we have gone through the Review Petition and the connected papers. We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. The Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed both on the ground of delay as well as on merits. ...................J. (H.L. DATTU) ....................J. (J. CHELAMESWAR) NEW DELHI , AUGUST 28, 2014.

n CHAMBER MATTER-2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(C) No. 1733/2014 IN C.A. No. 1018/2013 HARISH CHANDRA VARSHNEY & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOTILAL OSWAL PROPRIETOR & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. for c/delay in filing Review Petition) Date : 28/08/2014 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The Review Petition is dismissed both on the ground of delay as well as on merits. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.08.2816:50:34 ISTReason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 1733 OF 2014 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 1018 OF 2013HARISH CHANDRA VARHSNEY AND ORS. .. PETITIONER(S) VERSUSMOTILAL OSWAL, PROPRIETOR & ANR. .. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R There is a delay of 388 days in filing thereview petition, which has not been satisfactorilyexplained. Even otherwise, we have gone through

the Review Petition and the connected papers. Wesee no reason to interfere with the order impugned.The Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed bothon the ground of delay as well as on merits. ...................J. (H.L. DATTU) ....................J. (J. CHELAMESWAR)NEW DELHI,AUGUST 28, 2014.

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India