ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 13/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Anant K. Vatsya, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated in the signed order. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2532 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 11560 of 2015) AVTAR KAUR Appellant (s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. It is submitted that the allotment has been made to the appellant and he has already deposited the money. In view of the aforesaid, let possession be handed over to the appellant in case it has not been handed over so far. This order is passed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the instant case and not to be treated as precedent. Appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent. …..............J (ARUN MISHRA) …..............J (D.Y. CHANDRACHUD) NEW DELHI FEBRUARY 13, 2017
\224ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 13/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Anant K. Vatsya, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted.Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated in thesigned order. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER(Signed order is placed on the file)1IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2532 OF 2017(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 11560 of 2015)AVTAR KAUR Appellant (s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)O R D E R Leave granted.It is submitted that the allotment has been madeto the appellant and he has already deposited the money.In view of the aforesaid, let possession be handed overto the appellant in case it has not been handed over sofar. This order is passed in the peculiar facts andcircumstances of the instant case and not to be treatedas precedent.Appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.⬠¦..............J(ARUN MISHRA)⬠¦..............J (D.Y. CHANDRACHUD)NEW DELHI FEBRUARY 13, 2017
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 06/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Nitin Gaur, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter next week. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master
ÈITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11560/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 06/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Nitin Gaur, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Singhal, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter next week. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 30/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Nandini Gupta, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. K.K. Shukla, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List next week. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER
SECTION IV B Listed on 30.1.2017 Court No. 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 50 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 11560 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Avtar Kaur ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.04.2015 & 14.5.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Order dated 10.4.2015 Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks, to the respondents, limited to the extent of asking the petitioner to give an affidavit contrary to the provisions of Rule 10 of the Punjab Town Improvement (Utilization of Land & Allotment of Plots) Rules, 1983. “ Order dated 14.5.2015 The filing of the affidavit by the petitioner, as demanded by the respondent(allotment authority), is stayed for the present.” It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the five respondents by registered A.D. Post on 23.4.2015. It is further submitted that Mr. Devendra Singh, counsel has on 28.7.2015 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2. He has also filed Counter Affidavit on his behalf on 5.3.2016 after stipulated time. However, copy of the Counter Affidavit has already been included in SLP paper books. It is further submitted that Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Advocate has on 12.7.2016 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.3 but no Counter
Affidavit has been filed so far. It is further submitted that despite service no one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 4 and 5 so far. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 12.2.2016, when the following Order was passed: “ Respondent no. 2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the Rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 5, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the Rules. ” Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip/neeraj
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 30/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Nandini Gupta, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. K.K. Shukla, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List next week. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 12/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Ms. Nandini Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no. 2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the Rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 5, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the Rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS
SECTION IV B Listed on 12.02.2016 Court No. R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 72 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 11560 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Avtar Kaur ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 04.12.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 12.2.2016.” It is submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 & 5 despite completion of show cause notice. It is further submitted that Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 has not filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on his behalf. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 9 th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip
ª ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 12/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Ms. Nandini Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no. 2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the Rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent nos. 1 and 3 to 5, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the Rules.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (M V RAMESH)Sushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.02.1216:44:53 SCT RegistrarReason: PS
ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 04/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 12.2.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
SECTION IV B Listed on 04.12.2015 Court No. R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 61 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 11560 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Avtar Kaur ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 17.09.2015, when the following Order was passed: “ Respondent No. 2 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be allowed. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 4.12.2015.” It is submitted that there are five respondents in the matter. No Counter Affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent No. 2. It is further submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 4 & 5. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has on 29.11.2015 filed Affidavit with proof
of dasti service in respect of Respondent No. 3 stating therein that notice has been served on Respondent No. 3, but no one has filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 3 rd day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip
* ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 04/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 12.2.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.12.0416:15:13 SCTReason: * ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report)
Date : 04/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 12.2.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.12.0416:15:13 SCTReason:
ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R R espondent No. 2 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be allowed. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 4.12.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
SECTION IV B Listed on 17.09.2015 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.8 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 11560 OF 2015. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Avtar Kaur Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 03.09.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ It appears that petitioner had filed separate Writ Petition in 2012 and some relief was granted to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, it will not be appropriate to allow the prayer” It is submitted that Dr. Vipin Gupta, Advocate has filed application for intervention to intervene Ms. Veena Rani as Petitioner. The said application is registered as I.A. No. 2 and is included in the Paper Books. The appliction above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) with this office report. Dated this the 25 th day of June, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Ch. No. 115, R.K. Jain Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip
è ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No. 2 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be allowed. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.Signature Not Verified List again on 4.12.2015.Digitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.09.1816:22:36 SCTReason: (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (For intervention and office report) Date : 03/09/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nandini Gupta, Adv. Mr. K. K. Shukla, Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anshuman Ashok, Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It appears that petitioner had filed separate Writ Petition in 2012 and some relief was granted to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, it will not be appropriate to allow the prayer of the petitioner for intervention as the petitioner in SLP preferred out of another Writ Petition of 2014. The Prayer for intervention is therefore rejected. (Neeta) (Rajinder Kaur) Sr. P.A. Court Master
SECTION IV B Ch.Matter Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 (Application for interventiion on behalf of applicant, Veena Rani) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 11560 OF 2015. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Avtar Kaur Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Dr. Vipin Gupta, Advocate has filed application for intervention to intervene Ms. Veena Rani as Petitioner. The said application is registered as I.A. No. 2 and is included in the Paper Books. The appliction above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) with this office report. Dated this the 25 th day of June, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Ch. No. 115, R.K. Jain Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip
: ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (For intervention and office report) Date : 03/09/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nandini Gupta, Adv. Mr. K. K. Shukla, Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anshuman Ashok, Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It appears that petitioner had filed separate Writ Petition in 2012 and some relief was granted to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, it will not be appropriate to allow the prayer of the petitioner for intervention as the petitioner in SLP preferred out of another Writ Petition of 2014. TheSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Prayer for intervention is therefore rejected.Neeta SapraDate: 2015.09.0416:23:56 ISTReason: (Neeta) (Rajinder Kaur) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Interim relief and office report) Date : 14/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishna K. Shukla, Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The filing of the affidavit by the petitioner, as demanded by the respondent (allotment authority), is stayed for the present. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER
SECTION IV B Suppl. Listed on 14.05.2015 Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL)NO. 11560 OF 2015. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Avtar Kaur Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks, to the respondents, limited to the extent of asking the petitioner to give an affidavit contrary to the provisions of Rule 10 of the Punjab Town Improvement (Utilization of Land & Allotment of Plots) Rules, 1983. ” Accordingly, show cause notice to all the five respondents was issued on 23.04.2015. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Service of show cause notice is not complete. It is submitted that the matter above mentioned was mentioned before the Hon'ble Court on 12.05.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ List on 14.05.2015 before appropriate bench.” The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 13 th day of May, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip
\234 ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Interim relief and office report) Date : 14/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishna K. Shukla, Adv. Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The filing of the affidavit by the petitioner, as demanded by the respondent (allotment authority), is stayed for the present. (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushil Kumar RakhejaDate: 2015.05.1517:38:12 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.804 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12/05/2015 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned by counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 14.05.2015 before appropriate bench. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Sr. P.A. (Sneh Bala Mehra) Assistant Registrar
\206 ITEM NO.804 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11560/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12/05/2015 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned by counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 14.05.2015 before appropriate bench. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P.A. Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJayant Kumar AroraDate: 2015.05.1316:55:12 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 6320/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 10/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. K.K. Shukla, Adv. Mr. A. Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks, to the respondents, limited to the extent of asking the petitioner to give an affidavit contrary to the provisions of Rule 10 of the Punjab Town Improvement (Utilization of Land & Allotment of Plots) Rules, 1983. (VINOD KR.JHA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
n ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 6320/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2014 in CWP No. 25137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AVTAR KAUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 10/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. K.K. Shukla, Adv. Mr. A. Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks, to the respondents, limited to the extent of asking the petitioner to give an affidavit contrary to the provisions of Rule 10 of the Punjab Town Improvement (Utilization of Land & Allotment of Plots) Rules, 1983.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVinod KumarDate: 2015.04.1111:56:27 ISTReason: (VINOD KR.JHA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER