ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.11 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-03-2015 in BA No. 362/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 6734/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6735/2015) Date : 11-01-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.K.Dey,Adv. Ms. Shilpi Dey,Adv. Ms. Shreyasi Chakraborty,Adv. Mr. Manish,Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Bhachawat,Adv. Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, AOR Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (MADHU BALA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 27/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr P.K.Dey, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr Karan Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.2 has already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.1 has yet to file the same. One weeks time is requested. Be taken on record, if so filed, else, to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
è ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 27/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr P.K.Dey, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr Karan Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.2 has already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.1 has yet to file the same. One weeks time is requested. Be taken on record, if so filed, else, to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.11.2716:49:05 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms Shilpi Dey, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Swati Ghildiyal, Adv. Ms K.V.Bharathi Upadhyay, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks time. Respondent no.2 is also served. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within the respective stipulated time. List again on 27.11.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
à ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms Shilpi Dey, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Swati Ghildiyal, Adv. Ms K.V.Bharathi Upadhyay, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks time. Respondent no.2 is also served. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within the respective stipulated time. List again on 27.11.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.09.12 (RACHNA GUPTA)11:52:47 ISTReason: Registrar
ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 10/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Vijay Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already filed affidavit in proof of dasti service in respect of respondent no.1. Office report also suggests in that respect. Despite service no one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.1. Despite undertaking given earlier by the ld. Counsel, Mr B.K.Upadhyay appearing on behalf of Mr D.S.Mahra, Advocate-on-record who appeared earlier for respondent no.2 but at the time of call no one is present and further more neither vakalatnama nor counter affidavit has been filed on
-2- Item No.73 behalf of respondent no.2. Viewed thus, liberty is granted to the ld. counsel for the petitioner to serve notice upon the standing counsel of the State of Delhi within two weeks time and file proof thereof. At this stage, the ld.counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has already served respondent no.2 through the Trial Court and to that effect report has already come effecting service on respondent no.2. Registry to verify and if it is found that service was effected properly on respondent no.2, no further effort is necessary from the end of the petitioner. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules, if the matter is otherwise ready in all respects, unless otherwise list before the Registrar's Court. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar
Ú ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 10/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Vijay Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already filed affidavit in proof of dasti service in respect of respondent no.1. Office report also suggests in that respect. Despite service no one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.1. Despite undertaking given earlier by the ld. Counsel, Mr B.K.Upadhyay appearing on behalf of Mr D.S.Mahra,Signature Not Verified Advocate-on-record who appeared earlier for respondent no.2Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.08.1311:25:36 ISTReason: but at the time of call no one is present and further more neither vakalatnama nor counter affidavit has been filed on -2-Item No.73behalf of respondent no.2. Viewed thus, liberty is grantedto the ld. counsel for the petitioner to serve notice upon
the standing counsel of the State of Delhi within two weekstime and file proof thereof. At this stage, the ld.counselappearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he hasalready served respondent no.2 through the Trial Court andto that effect report has already come effecting service onrespondent no.2. Registry to verify and if it is found thatservice was effected properly on respondent no.2, nofurther effort is necessary from the end of the petitioner. Registry to process the matter for being listed beforethe Hon'ble Court as per rules, if the matter is otherwiseready in all respects, unless otherwise list before theRegistrar's Court. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar
ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 05/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Affidavit of serving both the respondents by dasti notice has not been filed. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has mentioned that the service is not getting possible to be effected through dasti notice. It is requested that both the respondents be served through the Trial Court concerned. At this stage, the Ld. Advocate, Mr. B.K. Upadhyay, appearing on behalf of Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate-on-record has appeared for respondent No.2. Complete set of the pleaidngs be provided by the petitioner to this respondent. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2 be filed within the respective stipulated time period. For respondent No.1, steps be taken by the petitioner to get served through the Trial Court concerned. List again on 10.8.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
Ò ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3240/2015 SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 05/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Affidavit of serving both the respondents by dasti notice has not been filed. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has mentioned that the service is not getting possible to be effected through dasti notice. It is requested that both the respondents be served through the Trial Court concerned. At this stage, the Ld. Advocate, Mr. B.K. Upadhyay, appearing on behalf of Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate-on-record has appeared for respondent No.2. Complete set of the pleaidngs be provided by the petitioner to this respondent. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2 be filed within the respective stipulated time period. For respondent No.1, steps be taken by the petitioner to get served through the Trial Court concerned. List again on 10.8.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.05.1117:57:55 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 6219/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/03/2015 in BA No. 362/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (Eith appln. (s) for permission to file SLP and interim relief) Date : 17/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Vijay Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Ms. S. Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Shilpi Dey, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file SLP granted. Issue notice returnable in two weeks. Notice be served through standing counsel as well. Dasti, in addition. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
\204 ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 6219/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/03/2015 in BA No. 362/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SHALU RAGHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS MONIL YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (Eith appln. (s) for permission to file SLP and interim relief) Date : 17/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Vijay Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Ms. S. Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Shilpi Dey, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file SLP granted. Issue notice returnable in two weeks. Notice be served through standing counsel as well. Dasti, in addition.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.04.18 (MEENAKSHI KOHLI)07:23:46 ISTReason: (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER