Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2016 / Diary 10171

SEEMA AMBEKAR v. STATE OF U.P .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10171/2016

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

13-04-2016

Bench

Petitioner

SEEMA AMBEKAR

Respondent

STATE OF U.P .

Primary Holding

Observations made by a court while dismissing an SLP under Article 136 shall not prejudice the accused at trial, as merits must be decided independently on evidence.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2852/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/12/2015 in WPMS No. 2409/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SEEMA AMBEKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 13/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Paras Kuhad,Sr.Adv. Mr. Manu Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Jitin Chaturvedi,Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Swati Vijayvargiya,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However, the observation made against the petitioner shall not come in the way at the time of trial and deciding the case on merits. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.) NO.2852 OF 2016 WITH CRL. MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NOS.6277, 6545 AND 6546 OF 2016 (Applications for exemption from filing official translation, Permission to file Additional Documents and exemption from filing official translation) SEEMA AMBEKAR ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed by Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate on behalf of Petitioner against the Judgment and Order dated 23 rd December, 2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh in Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 2409 of 2014. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 11 th April, 2016 filed additional documents alongwith applications for permission to file the same and exemption from filing official translation (in the form of paper books). The said applications have been registered as Criminal Misc. Petition Nos. 6545 & 6546 of 2016 respectively. Copy of the same is circulated herewith for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 12 th day of April, 2016. Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate A-207, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 C4/dk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

àITEM NO.19 COURT NO.9 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2852/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/12/2015in WPMS No. 2409/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)SEEMA AMBEKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief)Date : 13/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Paras Kuhad,Sr.Adv. Mr. Manu Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Jitin Chaturvedi,Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv. Ms. Swati Vijayvargiya,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.No ground for interference is made out to exerciseour jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution ofIndia. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.However, the observation made against the petitionershall not come in the way at the time of trial and decidingthe case on merits.Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India