ITEM NO.21 Court 2 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No. 348/2019 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 114389/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 59958/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 114393/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND IA No. 114390/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 07-02-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. Gaurav, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, learned advocate in support of the petitioner and Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, learned advocate for the respondents. The High Court rejected the application seeking initiation of action in contempt jurisdiction with ollowing observations: “ Order of learned Single Judge specifically mentions that the petitioner should be allowed to join on the post and the payment of salary has been taken into consideration from 06.01.2014 but it has been left subject to decision of the competent authority, on representation to be filed by the petitioner. The ...2/-
- 2 - competent authority after receiving the representation, decided the same and calculated part of salary to which petitioner was entitled. It was calculated from the date of order passed by the Commissioner i.e. January 2014 till 31 st March, 2015 the date on which scheme came to an end. It was not disputed by the petitioner that the BRGF Programme came to an end in March, 2015. But his claim is that he should have been engaged in some other service. The submission made by the petitioner is not sustainable because the petitioner has been engaged on contractual basis for a particular period and on a particular post/work under a specific scheme. Therefore, as soon as the scheme comes to an end, petitioner’s services will automatically come to an end and he cannot have any right to claim employment on any other post or for extension of the period.” With the assistance of the learned counsel, we have gone through the record. We do not find any reason to take a different view in the matter. This Special Leave Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (RAJNI MUKHI) (VIRENDER SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION IV-C (HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No.348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No.59958/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; IA No.114393/2020 – FOR XEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; IA No.114389/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; and, IA No.114390/2020 – FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 28-01-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. Gaurav, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 07.02.2022. (MUKESH NASA) (DIPTI KHURANA) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.2 SECTION IV-C (HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No.348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No.114389/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; IA No.59958/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; IA No.114393/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; and, IA No.114390/2020 – FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 03-12-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. Gaurav, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter dated 02.12.2021, circulated by Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, learned Advocate for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned to 28.01.2022. (MUKESH NASA) (VIRENDER SINGH) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.35 Court 2 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No. 348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 114389/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 59958/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 114393/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 114390/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 08-10-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR Mr. Akash Agrawal Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. Gaurav, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In terms of letter dated 06.10.2021 circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned to 03.12.2021. (INDU MARWAH) (VIRENDER SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.802 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No. 348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 29-07-2021 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR(Mentioned by) For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter is scheduled to be listed on 27.09.2021. The matter shall retain its position. (INDU MARWAH) (VIRENDER SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.21 Court 9 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No. 348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 59958/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 114393/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 114389/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 114390/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 12-03-2021 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter stands adjourned for two weeks. (ASHWANI KUMAR) (VIRENDER SINGH) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-C (HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No.348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No.114393/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; IA No.114389/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; IA No.59958/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.; and, IA No.114390/2020 – FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 19-02-2021 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. Hussain Ali, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned to 12.03.2021. (MUKESH NASA) (VIRENDER SINGH) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.11 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No. 348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 114393/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 114389/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 59958/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 114390/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 04-02-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhay Singh Adv Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In terms of letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned for two weeks. (INDU MARWAH) (PRADEEP KUMAR) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-A (HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No.348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION; and, IA No.59958/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date : 28-09-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. S.C. Verma, Adv. Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. Hussain Ali, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter dated 25.09.2020 circulated by Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, learned Advocate for the State of Chhattisgarh, the matter is adjourned for four weeks. (MUKESH NASA) (PRADEEP KUMAR) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION IV-A (HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8147/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2019 in CONT. No.348/2019 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh At Bilaspur) VED PRAKASH PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION; and, IA No.59958/2020 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date : 21-08-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice, returnable on 28.09.2020. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. (MUKESH NASA) (PRADEEP KUMAR) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER