AMRIK SINGH v. THE STATE OF HARYANA COLLECTOR

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 14905 OF 2016 KARTAR SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 14863-14864 OF 2016 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 10809 OF 2017 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 13474 OF 2017 O R D E R SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 14905 OF 2016: Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted. Delay condoned. This Special Leave Petition is disposed of in terms of our order dated 30.04.2014 delivered in S.L.P. (C) No. 37592 of 2012 and other connected matters, the lead matter being Civil Appeal Nos. 5093-5103 of 2014 etc. entitled Randhir Singh @ Dhira & Ors. vs. State of Haryana and Ors . However, interest for the period of delay is not to be given. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 14863-14864 OF 2016, SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 10809 OF 2017 AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 13474 OF 2017: Delay condoned.

2 These Special Leave Petitions are disposed of in terms of our order dated 20.01.2015 delivered in Civil Appeal No. 1078/2015 and other connected matters, the lead matter being Civil Appeal No. 1077 of 2015 etc. entitled Dharam Pal & Ors. vs. Land Acquisition Collector-cum-Distt. Revenue Officer. However, interest for the period of delay is not to be given. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. .......................... J. (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN) .......................... J. (VINEET SARAN) New Delhi; February 11, 2019.

3 ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.5 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14905/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-05-2012 in RFA No. 6130/2011 01-05-2012 in LACC No. 416/2007 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) KARTAR SINGH AND ORS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s) IA 53/2016 – PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA 54/2016,55/2017 WITH SLP(C) Nos. 14863-14864/2016 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 10809/2017 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 13474/2017 (IV-B) Date : 11-02-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Satish Hooda, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Hemant Gupta, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Manpreet Kaur Bhullar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

4 O R D E R These Special Leave Petitions are disposed of in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (R. NATARAJAN) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR Mr. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10809/2017 SUKHVINDER SINGH AND ORS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 14-07-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Satyendra Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents in connected matters have already been served and have already filed the reply also. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has made a request to adjourn the matter for appearance only. List again on 1.8.2017. Mr. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar

ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR Mr. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13474/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-05-2012 in RFA No. 1409/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AMRIK SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 10-07-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Satyendra Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, but no one has filed appearance on their behalf. Registry to process the matter as per Rules. Mr. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8044/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1409/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AMRIK SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 21/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No. 10809 of 2017. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB    Listed on 21.04.2017         Court No.7              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.34              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 8044 OF 2017 AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.  (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order) Amrik Singh ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors.  ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate on 31.03.2017 against the Judgment and Order dated 01.05.2012 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 1409/2011 (O&M) barred by time by 1705 days along with the applications for  condonation of delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No.10809/2017 @ CC No. 5781/2017 Entitled  SUKHVINDER SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS  arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.03.2017 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to direct issue of notice. The said SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 27.03.2017 is enclosed herewith). (Main Matter SC 14863­14864/2016). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 18th day of April, 2017.                                                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :­  Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Haokip/chetan

XITEM NO.34 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s).8044/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012in RFA No. 1409/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)AMRIK SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 21/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No. 10809 of 2017. (Jayant Kumar Arora)Court Master (Renu Diwan)Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 5781/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1406/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SUKHVINDER SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 27/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 14863-14864 of 2016. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar

SECTION IVB        Listed on. 27.03.2017          Court No. 7                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No. 27                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 5781 OF  2017      Sukhvinder Singh & Ors.         ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors.                  ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate on 21.02.2017 against the Judgment and Order dated 01.05.2012 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA  No.  1406 of 2011 (O & M)  barred by time by  1667  days along with the application for condonation of delay in filing SLP. It is further submitted that SLP (C) Nos. 14863­64 of 2016 Entitled Tehal Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc. Versus State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc.  arising out of common Order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.05.2016 when the Hon'ble Court was directed to issue of notice. The said SLP is pending after notice.(Copy of order dated 12.05.2016 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that in SLP (C) No. 29646 of 2011 Entitled Paramjit Kaur & Ors. Versus State of Haryana & Anr. referred to as Annexure P­2,  while granting leave , appeal (Civil Appeal Nos. 3934­3951 of 2014) was allowed on 12.03.2014 by Hon'ble Court. (Copy of order dated 12.03.2014 is annexed as Annexure P­2 at page nos.

90­93 in the paper books). It is further submitted that in SLP (C) No. 38730 of 2012 Entitled Dharam Pal & Ors. Vs Land Acquis Collecter­Cum­ Dist Rev.Officer arising out of common Order,  while granting leave , appeal (Civil Appeal Nos. 1077 of 2015) was disposed of on 20.01.2015 by Hon'ble Court. (Copy of order dated 20.01.2015 is annexed as Annexure P­3 at page nos. 94­98 in the paper books). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 24th day of March, 2017.                                                                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Satyendra Kumar, , Adv.                                                           ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Com1/Mty

:ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s).5781/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012in RFA No. 1406/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)SUKHVINDER SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 27/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s)UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 14863-14864 of 2016.(Jayant Kumar Arora)Court Master (Renu Diwan)Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14863-14864/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1411/2011 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1414/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/copy of impugned judgment and Office Report) WITH SLP(C) No. 14905/2016 (with appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP, permission to file additional documents and Office Report) Date : 20/03/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh,Adv. For Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Naresh K.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Sharma,AAG Mr. Arun Singh,Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Visen,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondents are directed to file an affidavit in response to our order dated 17.02.2017. One week's time is granted to file the same. The petitioners shall also file their response to the same within a week thereafter. List after two weeks. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Listed on 20.03.2017 Before Court No. 7 Item No. 3 SECTION IV­B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL ) NOS. 14863­14864 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5­6 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment) AND  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL ) NO 14905 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 55  (Application for permission to file additional documents) TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.    ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC.        …RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17 th February, 20167when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “ SLP(C) Nos. 14863­14864/2016  From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, it is not clear as to whether the lands of the petitioners are similarly situated as those covered by C.A. No. 1077/2015. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents seeks three weeks' time to get instruction. List on 20.03.2017. It is made clear that in case specific instruction are not furnished by filing an additional affidavit, within the time granted, mentioning therein the difference, if any, the Court will be constrained to have a decision

that the lands are similarly situated and will pass orders accordingly.   Contd...2/­ :2: SLP(C ) No. 14905/2016 The main contention of the petitioners is that their lands are similarly situated as those covered by C.A. No. 1077/2015. The respondents are directed to file an affidavit, within three weeks, as to whether the submission is correct or not. If it is not correct, the extent of difference shall also be indicated in the affidavit. It is made clear that in case the required affidavit, mentioning therein the difference, if any, is not filed within the time granted the Court will be constrained to have a decision that the lands are similarly situated and will pass orders accordingly. Post on 20.03.2017.” It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate for the Respondents has filed additional affidavit on their behalf in SLP (C) Nos. 14863­14864 of 2016 and the same is circulated before the Hon'ble Court.  It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay K. Visen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/appearance along with additional affidavits on behalf of all the Respondents in SLP (C) No. 14905 of 2016 and the same is also circulated before the Hon'ble Court.  Service of notice is complete in both the matters. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  Dated this the 10 th  Day of March, 2017.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate

Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate   Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate  Mr. Sanjay K. Visen, Advocate   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a

êITEM NO.3 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14863-14864/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012in RFA No. 1411/2011 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1414/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/copy of impugned judgment and Office Report)WITH SLP(C) No. 14905/2016(with appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP, permission to file additional documents and Office Report)Date : 20/03/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh,Adv. For Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv.Mr. Naresh K.,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Sharma,AAGMr. Arun Singh,Adv.Mr. Sanjay K. Visen,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondents are directed to file an affidavit in responseto our order dated 17.02.2017.One week's time is granted to file the same.The petitioners shall also file their response to the samewithin a week thereafter.List after two weeks. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14863-14864/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1411/2011 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1414/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 14905/2016 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) Date : 17/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Hari Kesh Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Sharma,AAG Mr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.14863-14864/2016 From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 4, it is not clear as to whether the lands of the petitioners are similarly situated as those covered by C.A. No.1077/2015. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents seeks three weeks' time to get instruction. 1

List on 20.03.2017. It is made clear that in case specific instruction are not furnished by filing an additional affidavit, within the time granted, mentioning therein the difference, if any, the Court will be constrained to have a decision that the lands are similarly situated and will pass orders accordingly. SLP(C) No. 14905/2016 The main contention of the petitioners is that their lands are similarly situated as those covered by C.A. No.1077/2015. The respondents are directed to file an affidavit, within three weeks, as to whether the submission is correct or not. If it is not correct, the extent of difference shall also be indicated in the affidavit. It is made clear that in case the required affidavit, mentioning therein the difference, if any, is not filed within the time granted the Court will be constrained to have a decision that the lands are similarly situated and will pass orders accordingly. Post on 20.03.2017 (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2

SECTION IV­B                     Listed on.17.02.2106                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    Court. 7                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION         Item.8 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL ) NO. 14863­14864  & 14905 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.    ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC.        …RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The SLP (C)...CC Nos. 8902­8903 along with connected matter were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12 th  May, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Permission to file SLP (C) No....CC No. 22630 of 2015 is granted. Delay is condoned on condition that in the event of enhancement being given to the petitioners, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any statutory benefits during the entire period covered by the delay, either in filing or refiling the special leave petitions.  Issue notice.” SLP(C) NO. 14863­14864  OF 2016 It is submitted that there are four Respondents in SLP (C) No. 14863 and three Respondents in SLP (C) No. 14864 of 2016 . Show Cause notice was issued to all the Respondents through Registered A.D. post. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/appearance along with Counter affidavit on behalf of all the Respondents.  Counter Affidavit is circulated with this office report. It is further submitted that Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner has filed a letter dated 19.10.2016 stating therein that identical matter pertains to same village has already been allowed by this Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 20.01.2015 in SLP (C) Nos. 525, 705, 10432 and 25213 of 2013 and the Copy of order dated 20.01.2015 has already been filed as Annexure P­3 at Page 94 to 98. (Copy of letter is enclosed herewith.) Service of show cause notice is complete.

SLP(C) NO. 14905  OF 2016 It is submitted that there are four Respondents in this matter.  Show  Cause notice was issued to all the Respondents through Registered A.D. post.  Neither AD Card nor unserved covers have been received back so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on all the four respondents. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  Dated this the 16 th  Day of February, 2017.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a

®ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14863-14864/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012in RFA No. 1411/2011 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1414/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(with office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 14905/2016(With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) Date : 17/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv.Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv.Mr. Hari Kesh Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Sharma,AAGMr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla,Adv.Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) Nos.14863-14864/2016From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos.1to 4, it is not clear as to whether the lands of the petitionersare similarly situated as those covered by C.A. No.1077/2015.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents seeks threeweeks' time to get instruction.1List on 20.03.2017.It is made clear that in case specific instruction are notfurnished by filing an additional affidavit, within the timegranted, mentioning therein the difference, if any, the Court willbe constrained to have a decision that the lands are similarlysituated and will pass orders accordingly.SLP(C) No. 14905/2016The main contention of the petitioners is that their lands aresimilarly situated as those covered by C.A. No.1077/2015.The respondents are directed to file an affidavit, withinthree weeks, as to whether the submission is correct or not. If itis not correct, the extent of difference shall also be indicated inthe affidavit. It is made clear that in case the required affidavit,mentioning therein the difference, if any, is not filed within thetime granted the Court will be constrained to have a decision thatthe lands are similarly situated and will pass orders accordingly.Post on 20.03.2017 (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR2

ITEM NO.80 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14863-14864/2016 TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 28/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Sharma,Adv. Mr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Hemant Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the respondents have already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

SECTION IV­B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL ) NO. 14863­14864 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.    ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC.        …RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The SLP (C)...CC Nos. 8902­8903 along with connected matter were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12 th  May, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Permission to file SLP (C) No....CC No. 22630 of 2015 is granted. Delay is condoned on condition that in the event of enhancement being given to the petitioners, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any statutory benefits during the entire period covered by the delay, either in filing or refiling the special leave petitions.  Issue notice.” It is submitted that there are four Respondents in SLP (C) No. 14863 and three Respondents in SLP (C) No. 14864 of 2016 . Show Cause notice has been issued to all the Respondents through Registered A.D. post. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/appearance along with Counter affidavit on behalf of all the Respondents. It is further submitted that Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner has filed a letter dated 19.10.2016 stating therein that identical matter pertains to same village has already been allowed by this Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 20.01.2015 in SLP (C) Nos. 525, 705, 10432 and 25213 of 2013 and the Copy of order dated 20.01.2015 has already been filed as Annexure P­3 at Page 94 to 98. (Copy of letter is enclosed herewith.) Service of notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this

office report.  Dated this the 26 th  Day of November, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a

ÈITEM NO.80 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14863-14864/2016TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 28/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Sharma,Adv. Mr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Hemant Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAll the respondents have already filed the counter affidavit.Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

SECTION – XVI                  MATTER FOR :  30.08.2016          COURT NO.     :  6    ITEM NO.        :   12                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14863 OF 2015 (with prayers for interim relief) AND INTERLOCOUTORY APPLICATION NO.9 (Application for filing additional documents) STOCK HOLDING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.. ... PETITIONER                        ­ VERSUS ­ INDUSIND BANK LTD. & ANR.                         ... RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT  The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22 nd  February, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order : “At the request made on both sides, list the  case for final disposal on 05.04.2016. We request the learned counsels for all the contesting parties to place on record their respective written arguments, including the points that would be argued and the decision  in support thereof, latest by 15.03.2016.”   It is  submitted that in view of Court's Order dated 22 nd  February, 2016, Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Counsel for the Petitioner and M/s. Parekh & Co., Advocates for Respondent No. 1 have on 15 th  March, 2016 filed their respective written submission/written arguments and the same have been included in the paperbooks. It is further submitted that M/s. Parekh & Co., Advocates has on 30 th  March, 2016 filed Written arguments on behalf of Respondent No. 1 with the permission of the Court for replacement of written arguments filed by them on 15 th  March, 2016 and the same have been replaced in the paperbooks. It is further submitted that an  amount of Rs. 15 crores with interest has been kept in safe custody at FDR having maturity date of 17 th  June, 2018. Service is complete on both the respondents in the matter.

And the matter was again listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.05.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “List the matter on 30 th  August, 2016.” It is submitted that Mr. Mohinder Singh Rupal, Advocate has on 12.08.2016 filed Annexures P­32 & P­33 as addl. Documents alongwith an application for filing additional documents and the same are being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 29 th   DAY OF AUGUST, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Advocate M/s. Parekh & Co. Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR JL

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8902-8903/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1411/2011 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1414/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 22630/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and Office Report) Date : 12/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Satish Hooda, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file SLP (C) No.....CC No. 22630 of 2015 is granted. Delay is condoned on condition that in the event of enhancement being given to the petitioners, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any statutory benefits during the entire period covered by the delay, either in filing or refiling

the Special Leave Petitions. Issue notice. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Sr. P.A. (Renu Diwan) Court Master

SECTION IVB      Listed on 12.05.2016          Court No.              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No.              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1­2 & 3­4 (Applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NOS. 8902­  8903 OF 2016       AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.  (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned order) Tehal Singh & Ors. Etc. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advocate on 25.08.2015 against the Judgment and Order dated 01.05.2012 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 1411 and 1414 of 2011 along with the application for  exemption from filing certified copy of impugned order. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 1121 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 219 days in refiling the SLP.  There is a total delay of 1340 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) Nos. 4525­4530 of 2016 @ CC Nos. 2146­2151 of 2016 entitled Surjeet Kaur And Ors. Etc. Etc. Versus State Of Haryana And Anr.  arising out of common order was directed by the

Hon'ble Court on 08.02.2016. SLP is pending after notice. (Copy of order dated 08.02.2016 is enclosed herewith) (main matter SLP (C) No. 2906/2016) It is further submitted that in SLP (C) No. 38730 of 2012 Entitled Dharam Pal & Ors. Versus Land Acquisition Collector­cum­Distt. Revenue officer referred to on Annexure P­3, while granting leave, appeal (Civil Appeal No. 1077 of 2015) was disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on 20.01.2015. (Copy of order dated 20.01.2015 is annexed as Annexure P­3 at page no. 94­98 in the paper books).(Main SLP (C) No. 34863 of 2012) It is further submitted that in SLP (C) No. 697 of 2013 Entitled  Janak Raj & Ors. Versus State Of Haryana & Ors.  arising out of common order, while granting leave, appeal (Civil Appeal No. 5132 of 2014) was allowed by the Hon'ble Court on 30.04.2014. (Copy of order dated 30.04.2014 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that in SLP (C) No. 22061 of 2015 Entitled  Kamaljeet Singh @ Kanwaljeet Versus State Of Haryana, Through, Collector Kaithal & Anr.  arising out of common order, while granting leave, appeal (Civil Appeal No. 6877 of 2015) was disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on 01.09.2015.  The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 11 th  day of May, 2016.                                                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr.  Satyendra Kumar , Adv.                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Haokip

SECTION IV B   Listed on 12.05.2016            Court No.              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Item No.              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2­52 (Application for permission to file SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL)CC NO. 22630 OF 2015. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for condonation of delay in filing and  refiling the SLP) AND  INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.  (Application for permission to file additional document) Kartar Singh & Ors.  Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors.       Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that Mr.  Bharat Bhushan , Advocate has filed Special Leave Petition on 09.02.2015 against the Judgment and Order dated  01.05.2012  of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in  RFA No. 6130 of 2011  alongwith application for permission to file Special Leave Petition  and permission to file additional document . It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two applications for condonation of delay in filing the SLP and refiling the SLP (i) there is a delay of 924 days in filing the SLP (ii) a delay of 276 days in refiling the SLP.  There is a total delay of 1200 days in filing and refiling the SLP. It is further submitted that in SLP (C) Nos. 12648­ 12650 of 2013 Entitled  Darshan Singh & Ors. Etc. Versus State Of Haryana & Ors  arising out of common order, while

granting leave, appeal (Civil Appeal Nos. 6301­6303 of 2015) was disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on 12.08.2015. (Copy of order dated 12.08.2015 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that in SLP (C) Nos. 10367­10385 of 2014 entitled  Shamey Singh & Ors Etc. Versus State Of Haryana & Ors arising out of common order was dismissed by the Hon'ble Court on 20.01.2015. (Copy of order dated 20.1.2015 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) CC No. 8902­8903 of 2016 entitled Tehal Singh & Ors. Etc. Etc. Versus  State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. as both are arising out of common order. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 11 th  day of May, 2016.                                                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :  Bharat Bhushan, Adv.                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Haokip

R ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8902-8903/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1411/2011 01/05/2012 in RFA No. 1414/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 22630/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and Office Report) Date : 12/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Satish Hooda, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file SLP (C) No.....CC No. 22630 of 2015 is granted. Delay is condoned on condition that in the event ofSignature Not Verified enhancementDigitally signed byJAYANT KUMAR ARORADate: 2016.05.13 being given to the petitioners, the petitioners16:58:23 ISTReason: shall not be entitled to any statutory benefits during the

entire period covered by the delay, either in filing or refilingthe Special Leave Petitions. Issue notice. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Renu Diwan) Sr. P.A. Court Master

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No. 22630/2015 KARTAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) I.A. 1/2015(for discharge of advocate on record and office report) Date : 16/03/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sukhdev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Satyapal Khushal Chand Pasi, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 1 of 2015 for discharge of Advocate-on-Record is allowed. (RASHI GUPTA) SR. P.A. (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER

SECTION IVB     Chamber matter   Listed on          Court No.              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No.              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for Discharge of Advocate­on­record) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 22630  OF 2015 Kartar Singh & Ors.  Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors.  Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate on 09.02.2015 against the Judgment and Order dated 01.05.2012 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 6130 of 2011. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for discharge of Advocate­on­record, Mr. S.K. Passi. The same is registered as I.A. No. 1 and included in the Paper Books. The application above mentioned is listed  before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) with this office report. Dated this the 10 th  day of February, 2016.                                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv.                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Haokip

à ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No. 22630/2015 KARTAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) I.A. 1/2015(for discharge of advocate on record and office report) Date : 16/03/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sukhdev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Satyapal Khushal Chand Pasi, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 1 of 2015 for discharge of Advocate-on-Record is allowed. (RASHI GUPTA) (INDU POKHRIYAL) SR. P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRASHI GUPTADate: 2016.03.1816:00:23 ISTReason: