Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2017 / Diary 10155

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR II v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR MANAGER

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10155/2017

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

28-04-2017

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Petitioner

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR II

Respondent

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR MANAGER

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No.8422/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/09/2016 in ITA No.178/2014 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR-II Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 28/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Ms. Meenakshi Grover, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No.12502 of 2017. In the meantime, the effect and operation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is permitted to substitute the name of the respondent as the respondent-Bank has been merged with State Bank of India. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) COURT MASTER (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER

Listed on :  28.4.17 Court. No. :  9 Item No.. : 16  SECTION IIIA       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO...C.C. 8422 OF 2017 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing  S pecial Leave Petition) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR­II        ....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE BANK OF  BIKANER & JAIPUR                 ....RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the Special Leave Petition above­mentioned is filed against the final order dated 14 th  September, 2016 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench  in I.T.A. Nos. 178 of 2014 and is barred by time by 108 days. Counsel for the Petitioner has filed Application for Condonation of Delay in filing Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the SLP (C) No. 12502 of 2017 @ SLP...CC No. 7509 of 2017 entitled “COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR II vs STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR” arising out of common order which was listed before the Hon'ble Court on  13 th  March, 2017, when the Hon'ble Court has directed to issue notice. (Copy of the order dated 13 th  March, 2017 is enclosed herewith for reference). The matter alongwith Application above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.   DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL,  2017.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate.                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR min3

ªITEM NO.16 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No.8422/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/09/2016in ITA No.178/2014 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 28/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASGMs. Meenakshi Grover, Adv.Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Issue notice.Tag with SLP (C) No.12502 of 2017.In the meantime, the effect and operation of the impugnedjudgment shall remain stayed.Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is permitted tosubstitute the name of the respondent as the respondent-Bank hasbeen merged with State Bank of India. (ASHAÂ SUNDRIYAL)COURTÂ MASTER (CHANDERÂ BALA)COURTÂ MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India