ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9954/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/02/2017 in CRA No. 715/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay) JAGDISH PRASAD G. AGRAWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUVARBA SUDHAKAR SOHANI AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and interim relief) Date: 10/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.M. Jadhav, Adv. M/s. S.M. Jadhav and Company,Advts For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Mr. Kailash Autade, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order so passed by the High Court of Bombay. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Consequent upon the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, pending application filed in the matter is also disposed of. However, as prayed for, six months' time is granted to vacate the suit premises subject to filing usual undertaking in the Registry of this Court within two weeks from today, stating that the petitioner shall not create any third party rights, will clear all the rent/dues/occupational charges in the meanwhile and will peacefully vacate the suit premises concerned at the end of six months from date, i.e., 10 th October, 2017 positively. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
\212ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9954/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/02/2017in CRA No. 715/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay)JAGDISH PRASAD G. AGRAWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUVARBA SUDHAKAR SOHANI AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and interim relief)Date: 10/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.M. Jadhav, Adv. M/s. S.M. Jadhav and Company,Advts For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Mr. Kailash Autade, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order sopassed by the High Court of Bombay. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.Consequent upon the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition,pending application filed in the matter is also disposed of.However, as prayed for, six months' time is granted to vacatethe suit premises subject to filing usual undertaking in theRegistry of this Court within two weeks from today, stating thatthe petitioner shall not create any third party rights, will clearall the rent/dues/occupational charges in the meanwhile and willpeacefully vacate the suit premises concerned at the end of sixmonths from date, i.e., 10 th October, 2017 positively.(VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER